Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
2020 Range Rover Evoque P300 0-100km/h & engine sound
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 10. 2019
- 2020 Range Rover Evoque P300 0-100km/h & engine sound. Head over to performancedrive.com.au/2020-... for the full review.
2020 Range Rover Evoque P300 SE R-Dynamic
2.0-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder
221kW (300PS) and 400Nm
Nine-speed auto, all-wheel drive
For more stats and test results simply head over to our performance data page:
performancedrive.com.au/perfor...
If you're interested in buying a new car, we can help you. Our car buying team has saved buyers thousands of dollars. We do the haggling for you. Interested? Simply provide us with some details here so we can get in touch:
performancedrive.com.au/new-ca...
Exciting stuff starts at 1:45
Would be very interesting now to see the difference between a P250 or D240 to this
Can you do the new Range Rover velar SVR please
2nd gear start?😕
Could you also ad the weight and cw of the car. That would be a great addition imo.
Also the weight distribution is interesting to know
Don't be lazy and Do the research your self......
@@PGee. i gues he earns money with this channel. Thats a good trade-off for a bit more info and maybe morw viewers.
Imagine if he would also include a real life fuel consumption test, and also dbA test at the usual speed limits. This would be a quite unique channel.
Weight is listed at 0:13
Also, these videos are designed to supplement the written review. The written reviews go into more detail.
performancedrive.com.au/2020-range-rover-evoque-p300-r-dynamic-se-review-video-1518/
you could do evoque p300e?????
Great looking. If only you could really put two real adults in the back.
Something Got Me Started by Simply Red - Great cruising music!
You sure that's the song?
if evoque does it in 7 s,then what would do velar?? 8 sec??
My Dad will get d180 r dynamic SE
It's a city compact SUV so don't expect the exhilarating speed like in the sport...
What colour is that
2:12 that straining noise doesn’t sound good.. is that the handbrake or something?
It’s normal, the brakes are holding a car that wants to go.
I ve driven the p300 engine and right after it I drove an Audi Q5 with the 2.0 liter with 250hp. The audi was way faster and nimbler. The p300 engine was a let down to me, it just doesnt feel like a 300 hp car when you're driving it, far from it.
Audi.......;-)
Whoever set up this transmission needs to get fired. Seriously, not only does it make the car sound a tad winter, but it also fucks up its performance.
There’s something incredibly wrong for a turbo-charged car with this weight to only get to 100kmh after over 7 seconds(which even my 04 Accord V6 with 240hp, 5-speed trans. and way less torque could do).
That fuel consumption is much higher than my BMW M4 lol
No it isn't
@@v12-s65 yes it is
@@Porche992 My cousin has a BMW M3 F80. 11L/100km. Well yeah fuck it's the same xD
believe it or not the p300 range rover evoque was said to average about 30 mpg whilst my f82 m4 comp averages around 34 mpg
Gearbox very very slow
even tiguan with 190 hp does same 7s time lol
a 4 cylinder for such a car is an offence consifering the price. a 6 cylinder is here the way to go.
I wouldn't purchase a range rover even if it fell on me
@@PGee. i wouldnt also. :D. dont know about this newer models but the older ones are very unreliable...
peter G haha that’s fuckin hilarious
@@kylewickham885 Awwwww let me guess you own a range rover........
Wow, this car is remarkably slow for 300hp. And that torque, only 400 nM? Is this right? Ofc, it's only a 2L engine, but still..
cant really get more out of a 2 litre Petrol. Buy rather the diesel with 500nm
Kohei Yamaguchi yes, the engine might not be the best off the line, but I'm sure it can keep up good on the highway
You can definetly get it faster. I think for the 240-250hp version the claimed time is around 6. Something seconds. This should be even faster than that. No way it does 7 seconds. I bet even a 300 hp sport could go faster.
Luka Poseidon the sport is faster from 0-100, at least the sdv6 with 306ps. I can send you a link of it doing 6.4secs from 0-100
but what is reliability of range rover i consider to buy a 2014 one about 50k but worried reliability..
Big Chief buy a facelifted one from 2015 and above. Mine is a 2016 td4 with 180hp and has now 115 thousand km on it without a single problem
@@bens6674 explain please cobber ..
@@v12-s65 i have heard people have problem even with 2015 and later models, some major problem. when they are out of warranty they seem very hard to sell. i am considering it but i feel like these cars are not built to last, maybe 5 years of good motoring if you are lucky and then something will shit itself and cost thousands to repair. but i could be wrong. but the product reviews on range rover are very concerning.. i love the styling of them but not if its going to cost a fortune to run and maintain
@@v12-s65 the main problems i hear are related to electrics, air suspension and transmission
Big Chief it sure won't be the transmission or the engine. Mine had some leaks but it got fixed within the warranty at 99'900km. I have to say though that I drive it a little bit harder since I didn't pay anything for the car. But the transmission's made from zf and that's the same manufacture that delivers to porsche, bmw, jaguar and other brands. Won't expect many more problems from it. The car still drives as day one after 3years, and that's a good sign. Pretty sure that it will still be running good until 170'000km. But I wouldn't consider driving a range rover for more than 150thousand km 😂
0-100 7 sec??? Why so slow for 300 hp??
2 L and 300 PS? We live in society.
Söder Fråga mercedes makes 421ps out of 2L
@@v12-s65 really? In A series? Never think about but it is what it is. Nevertheless, imagine they making GLS with 2 L, huh. RR is SUV and their 2L car is compact car
Söder Fråga yeah 421ps in the CLA45s and A45s AMG models. Well a gls with a 4pot would be hideous. Such a small engine can't pull a 2 ton car and even push it against those ridiculous aerodynamics of a tank, just does not work out. The evoque is quite at it's limits with a 2 litre and having the weight of around 1850kg, but anyways it's still a relatively compact car and it works out, probably not in fuel economy though.
Volvo xc40 is faster whit 60 horse power less
From a dead start yes
Launching from second gear...
Yes. We also tried starting from 1st manually, as mentioned in the video, but the times were slightly slower.
@@PDriveTV so it's faster if you start in 2nd?
Sounds terrible
300 CV and the 0-100 in 7 seconds??? My Golf GTI that 200 CV in 6 seconds....
MarcReigns46 This issue happens on all the other jaguar-land rover products with this new 2 litre, no matter the 250ps or 300ps version. They are either lying about the real engine figure or this is just something really wrong with its drivetrain.
Weight?
Michael Zuo really funny when the old 2015 evoque does a dead 7 from 0-100 with only 240ps
Shite
😂😂😂😂😂 Che bidone 😂😂😂🤦♂️🤦♂️
I hate it
I have to say the new Evoque is likely the worst new car I’ve driven in a long time. I was shocked how horrible it was. The clunky 9-speed ZF transmission and terribly calibrated throttle mapping led to the car surging or feeling like it had no power. The brakes also felt oddly inconsistent. The 300HP engine felt like it was burdened by the Evoque’s porky weight. It never felt quick at all. JLR honestly just needs to license engines from BMW or Mercedes or VWAG. I have been super disappointed with every 4-cylinder JLR product I’ve driven. None of them sounded good whatsoever, felt quick or were as refined as other luxury 2.0T engines. The new 3.0L I-6 engine also seems to suffer from weird calibrations that make the engine feel like it has tons of lag. I don’t know how they managed to do that when it’s got an electric supercharger in addition to a turbocharger. BMW and Mercedes both have much better 3.0L I-6 engines. It’s disappointing because Jaguar used to produce some of the best I6 and V12 engines on the market. Now they just seem to be confused how to properly program the cars’ complex electrical architecture.
What range did you drive with the I6? Was considering getting an hst
I'm buying the v8 then...
dude you sound like a spoiled nerd saying the car never felt quick, are you that daft you don't
get the car's target audience? range rover makes a fucking pristine car idk what youre off about. go buy the new ford explorer if you want a quicker take off. i love my evoque, it drives better than my X5, it has a sexy fucking moon roof, an illuminated entry, its wonderfully upholstered and came with a killer sound system. Range Rover >
@@mydogsbestfren7490 the Evoque is a piece of shit. The transmission is horrendous. It weighs more than an F-Pace even though it’s much smaller, it’s still based on a Ford FWD platform that JLR has done little to improve, the engines are horrible. If that makes me “daft” so be it. The target audience is women who have no clue what a good car is. They want it because it’s “cute”. The Meridian sound system is trash compared to good stereos from other brands like H/K, Bowers and Wilkins, Burmester, Etc. I know because I had it in my own Land Rover product.
If you think a 2 ton front wheel drive four cylinder vehicle drives better than an X5, you’re definitely the target buyer. Lol. That’s actually one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard.
@@v12-s65 buy the V8. I drove an HST.
Even slower than a 250ps XC40. This is totally an overpriced fancy-looking junk.
even 220hp tiguan does it faster than 300 hp evoque
very fragile especially after a few years when problems accumulate
My diesel evoque is very robust and fine after 90k miles now
@@v12-s65 let's see at more than 150k
Mohamed Ali Hebboul 150k why the hell should I have one car for that long 😂😂
@@v12-s65 So the person who will take it after you, would certainly have problems.
Mohamed Ali Hebboul at least it won't be my problem then...
2:12 that straining noise doesn’t sound good.. is that the handbrake or something?
He held the brake while applying throttle