Please don't stop uploading. I have watched every single video you uploaded and have learnt so much. Do you know of any similar youtube channels which analyse fashion magazines? :)
Film, I am deeply honored by your comment. Seriously, thank you so much for your kind words. I don't know of any other channel that analyzes fashion magazines. I have about ten mags in my possession that I need to review and post. I will really try to get one out this coming weekend. Again, my deepest thanks.
@@room111photography5 I would love if you could analyze Cameron Hammond's or Sam Dameshek's film photography. I am very interested in swimwear photography in case there are any photos you could include :)
@@JugglingCarlos The problem is I don't have high end editing software to cut in their photos and make comments simultaneously. I wish I had those skills. I remember you asking me to do this about a year ago and I didn't come through. I do apologize for that.
@@JugglingCarlos Greetings, Film: I owed you an analysis, so I am providing it here. First, Cameron Hammond. He is a fashion photographer. He has a central theme throughout all his photos: super-hot models in swimsuits. Gorgeous. Shapely. No emaciated look of L.A. or New York models. His strength is outdoor by swimming pools. Great composition. Photos look spontaneous and not planned, which is why he probably uses a speedlite for quickness indoors, not dragging around heavy studio equipment to slow his pace. Too much implied nude. He should do more nudes. Implied is weak. Photoshop: pulls sharpness and clarity to the right; underexposes by a third of a stop; pulls offset both right and left; pulls contrast right; pulls saturation both left and right. Overall, excellent work. Sam Dameshek: Not a fashion photographer. His work is very much like William Eggleston's work: cannot fit it into one genre. He shoots whatever he sees, and that is very, very cool. Shoots some celebrities. Much of his work has an instant film feel, like Polaroid or Instax. He is better with strobe/flash photography than Hammond. Lighting upon the subject is very even and natural. Does great strobe work outdoors, which is not easy to do. Photoshop: underexposes by a half stop; contrast pulled both left and right; some images offset is pulled right for a whitish cast. Summary: both photographers are excellent in their own right. But if you like swimwear, Cameron Hammond is the one you should study, I think. He is truly a fashion photographer who specializes in swimwear. And again, Dameshek is like Eggelston, shooting everything. Please reply so I know you received this. I cannot make a standalone episode on this because I can't insert photos and comment on them. Just need to know you got this. Be well, Rob
“Goodnight” haha
Please don't stop uploading. I have watched every single video you uploaded and have learnt so much. Do you know of any similar youtube channels which analyse fashion magazines? :)
Film, I am deeply honored by your comment. Seriously, thank you so much for your kind words. I don't know of any other channel that analyzes fashion magazines. I have about ten mags in my possession that I need to review and post. I will really try to get one out this coming weekend. Again, my deepest thanks.
@@room111photography5 I would love if you could analyze Cameron Hammond's or Sam Dameshek's film photography. I am very interested in swimwear photography in case there are any photos you could include :)
@@JugglingCarlos The problem is I don't have high end editing software to cut in their photos and make comments simultaneously. I wish I had those skills. I remember you asking me to do this about a year ago and I didn't come through. I do apologize for that.
@@JugglingCarlos Greetings, Film: I owed you an analysis, so I am providing it here.
First, Cameron Hammond. He is a fashion photographer. He has a central theme throughout all his photos: super-hot models in swimsuits. Gorgeous. Shapely. No emaciated look of L.A. or New York models. His strength is outdoor by swimming pools. Great composition. Photos look spontaneous and not planned, which is why he probably uses a speedlite for quickness indoors, not dragging around heavy studio equipment to slow his pace. Too much implied nude. He should do more nudes. Implied is weak.
Photoshop: pulls sharpness and clarity to the right; underexposes by a third of a stop;
pulls offset both right and left; pulls contrast right; pulls saturation both left and right.
Overall, excellent work.
Sam Dameshek:
Not a fashion photographer. His work is very much like William Eggleston's work: cannot fit it into one genre. He shoots whatever he sees, and that is very, very cool. Shoots some celebrities. Much of his work has an instant film feel, like Polaroid or Instax.
He is better with strobe/flash photography than Hammond. Lighting upon the subject is very even and natural. Does great strobe work outdoors, which is not easy to do.
Photoshop: underexposes by a half stop; contrast pulled both left and right; some images offset is pulled right for a whitish cast.
Summary: both photographers are excellent in their own right. But if you like swimwear, Cameron Hammond is the one you should study, I think. He is truly a fashion photographer who specializes in swimwear. And again, Dameshek is like Eggelston, shooting everything.
Please reply so I know you received this. I cannot make a standalone episode on this because I can't insert photos and comment on them. Just need to know you got this.
Be well,
Rob
I just stumbled across your channel and completely agree with the original comment. Keep it coming brother.
Your comments are just cracking me up