Fujifilm GFX 100S II | What's different from the GFX 100II?
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 06. 2024
- It might get confusing to have a Fujifilm GFX 100II and a GFX 100sII and there are some differences that set them appart - including the price!
-
My website: www.crisphotography.info
My Instagram: @cris_photo_graphy
@cris_weddings - Věda a technologie
Passed on the 100II due to the price, but the 100s II is very tempting! Thanks for the comparison video
I agree! The things they removed aren’t that important to me - however the price is! Take care
hello thanks for clarifications - does it also de squeeze anamorphic lens like the GFX 100 11 ?
How are you getting on with the new T+S lenses? I find them complex compared to others and the lack of a foot on the 110mm compared to the 30mm a little hard to bear with?
I preordered the 100S II (using the GFX50S and 50R Sinne 2019). I also shoot Weddings and couples and i m looking forward to the new AF capabilities. The 55 1.7 is a very slow lens with the old system. But the 110 is fast.
Nice!
I held the two for 30 min the other day. Def differences, the viewfinder is a teensy bit clearer but smoother. All around def looks nicer although the Sii looks great as well. The 100ii has an awesome textured dark grey finish on the metal compared to a semigloss cheaper looking black on the Sii. The viewfinder doesn’t come off the Sii which sucks if you’re using it with an ext monitor for whatever reason. The Sii def feels lighter in hand with a lens and that seems like the perfect weight (Im 6’3” and have big hands even and the 100ii feels big). as far as $2500 price difference I dunno I think that’s a big spread just for 8k 30fps.
Thanks for the additional feedback and info!
Does it have same sensor as at 100 ii .....I currently have the 50s ii and really love it but want to upgrade the auto focussing the 100 ii is way too much in Australia
Same AF performance as the 100 II. Very slightly different sensor in regards to read out speed it seems. IQ should be identical.
@@scotttucker9613 definitely not the same for AF speed between two cameras. Noticeable better for 100ii if you shoot moving objects.
Exactly, 2 things: slower readout speed and AF tracking. But like I said in another comment, it doesn't bother me enough to mention it (having tried both). Cheers!
Is there any real difference between the II's HS sensor versus the SII's? Just one FPS or genuinely slower readout?
Slower readout, but just a bit. I think it was mentioned at petapixel or fstoppers
autofocus speed is really quite a bit better for 100 ii especially for tracking. I have tested both two cameras extensively in China for more than a week.
Thanks Marc, both tom and platofong 8264 are correct in their answers. There are of course some differences that could be important to some and less to others. It is indeed true that the tracking works best on the 100 II and that the read out speed is slower, but personally I didn't notice enough of a difference to mention it (but again, it all boils down to what you need and what "slow" or "fast" means to you). Take care
@@cris_photography I just got my SII, and so far haven't really noticed a difference.
Which is better Fujifilm GFX 100S II vs x2d?
Good question! Didn’t test the Haselblad offering so I’d have to try it first 😉
Do you think that in the photo it has the same quality as the gfx ll
It is the same as the GFX 100 II yes
@@cris_photography Thanks for sharing - I would like to know if you think it has the same quality as Hasseblad or one surpasses the other - Regards
@rubiseltovilla1827 I think the are very similar in terms of mp and quality, but you’ll want to check the lenses and that’s what will determine grandly the final IQ. But I think Fuji came a long a way and they make amazing cameras for the price point.
Plenty of CF express type B cards are cheaper or similarly priced to SD cards.
Not the good ones (which is why you use those). And since i have prolly 30 SD cards having to switch to CF is utterly annoying and useless if I don’t do video - not to mention the adaptor needed to read that card format (my Mac has SD not CF)
Why is every reviewer talking like the 100s didn't exist. They didn't reduce the size from 100II... it's just 100s with some minor improvements
Sure
Tested both, side by side in a store with the 55/1.7. AF from the new S II is a totally different ball park. To be honest.
Because the S II is almost identical to the 100 II in terms of performance. Far better than the original 100S.
Is the viewfinder resolution in the s ii really that much different than the ii?
@inquisitvem6723 HONESTLY? No
Video??.... zzzzz
Hum?