1960s tech like: The first video game console. ... The first computer mouse. ... Light Emitting Diodes. ... Dynamic Random Access Memory. ... Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. ... UNIX.
@@DeputyNordburg Well if you want to replay history..then yes using all that used NASA tech from the late 60's and early 70's would be right on course for returning us to the Moon.....but just show us the $$$$$$$$...
@Mr Natty Gains Space craft just by definination of what they are and the environment in which they are expected to operate..are in my opinion the most costly machines manufactured by man..
How is the earth flat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's obviously kite shaped duh because at the peak shows Antarctica which everyone knows it's at the top!♦
Flat Earth is not about the shape of the Earth. It's just a cry for attention. Those folks don't know or care what the shape is, and are in no way effected by it.
*are the flags left in the moon still there? * We Know what a freaking flag is but can anyone answer me straight is the flag still there yes or no that's it
I like that they went and just said fuck the nay-sayers. Fuck the people who said they couldn't do it, and the loosers that say they didn't. Best part of it to me.
Not a rationalization but a contradiction in terms, the premise does not work. Therefore, no such conclusion can be made, that being said, the conclusion between the two actually would be the opposite. A true use of a sound rationale.
The shadow of the A12 flag can still be seen in recent LRO images of the site, closely matching pictures taken on the surface. The A11 flag shadow is gone as expected since Buzz Aldrin reported that it fell over at LM ascent. I think the other 4 flags (their shadows, actually) are still visible in the LRO images.
Neil Armstrong also planted items representing the other countries involved in the NASA missions, or the race to the moon. He changed the mission badge to represent a peaceful missions, placing an olive branch at the foot of the eagle.
LOL go buy a nikon p900 and zoom in on the moon and then tell me they left something on the moon the alarm should have went off when they so called the moon from the white house in the 70's
@@cuttinup7777 that’s right. Even today you can’t call a cell phone from a land line. That technology is decades away. You’d need to solder 2 wires together back then. No way.
Pourquoi l'ombre du vaisseau sur la lune ne bouge pas de 1 millimetre pendant la video tournée pendant 1 heure sur la lune ? l ombre ne bouge pas sur la lune comme sur la terre ???
Offcourse an alien from earth with having skills of algorithms combination of coding.. unfortunately they know bout all your data whatever you googled including incognito mode😂
It's so self-important to claim other people accomplishments like landing on the moon are fake. I can see why people with no accomplishments tell lies like this.
@Ray MASSIH No it didn't. The show had low ratings, very few people heard it. CBS didn't even broadcast it in many rural regions opting for other programing. Nobody thought it was real, at least there are no first hand accounts of anyone thinking it was real. There were people who said they were scared. People get scared in horror movies, it does not mean they thought it was real. The newspaper industry essentially made it up to show it's advertisers, and regulators, that radio management was irresponsible and not to be trusted with anything serious like their main product, the news. People were very accustomed to fictional programs on the radio at the time. It's nice to imagine some rube out in the sticks running out of his house in fear of aliens, but it's bullshit.
Danny Mccoy yes we did. We wouldn’t be able to create a moon like surface or look like shown in Apollo 11 video. Also if we could have faked it the lightning would be brighter than bright
Razor Tanner oh yeah of course it is lol the technology in the late 60’s and 70’s was definitely great enough to have a camera on the moon remotely controlled from earth. What a load of absolute crap.
Razor Tanner you’re correct.. the cameras were invented. But were they really talking live from the moon back down to earth? You believe that? I can’t get a signal in a concrete stairwell
I recall hearing the question about the purpose of the American flag on the moon in 1969 to Buzz Aldrin at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. He snapped a quick answer "It was a present for the Russians - in case they ever landed and had any doubts that we got there first!"
How about a 28 year career Radiologist who calls bullshit on these _"Landings"_ because of the Deadly belts of Radiation surrounding earth's atmosphere Dr. Van Allen discovered in 1957???
Thanks for this... I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience... I hope one day the Apollo sites become a tourist attraction..🇳🇿
"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond the problem is that we don't have the technology to do that anymore we used to, but we destroyed that technology" - Don Pettit LOL
That's because the United States space program was actually a German space program under the United States flag with former Nazi's running the entire operation. The Germans were #1.
Krypton is a planet. If you mean the material, it is "kryptonite". And why would I pay 10,000 USD for a flag - that is almost as expensive as the coffee makers that the USAF once bought. They cost 16,000 USD - and that was almost 10 years later.
You don't have to believe in flat earth to think they faked the moon landings. Besides thrust and combustion being impossible in a vacuum, even NASA admits they can't go past low earth orbit.
Flags on the moon here is a little reality ..... One has to go to the Moon first. The first Two did not survive the ignition gases, yet they did not disturb any section of the so-called Moon surface I find that amazing.
Moon sand is not a fine powdery loose sand like we have here. The ignitiin gasses blew off a fine layer pretty quickly, but after that, its packed down pretty good.
It was a focus area that was given 100% approval, so the best minds and skilled ballsy pilots came together and accomplished this amazing mission to the moon. We never went back because it was no longer a priority.
_"No flags were ever there"_ In the 1970's this was probably true. Since then it has become quite apparent that the various contractors that make up the MIC, have created some extremely sophisticated weapons and technologies. I mean we all watched clear evidence of 50th Space Wing (USAF) using a low earth orbit platform to dispose of millions of tons of gypsum, steel, office furniture, bathrooms, people and ... aeroplane wrecks. But officially this technology still _doesn't exist_ . Likewise the 1980's saw literally hundreds of reports of giant triangular anti gravity stealth vehicles in NATO countries, in the run up to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the beginning of Perestroyka. But apparently all the policemen and airforce pilots who saw them were all on crack or something, because officially this technology _doesn't exist_ . Ronald Reagan started shooting his mouth off about dangerous forces offworld and people wondered if he was also on crack, or maybe just drunk. Turns out he'd already pushed the SDI program through without any form of oversight and from the moment he realised what he had done, the rogue elephant in the room was (and still is) directly over everyone's head. Anyway, the point is that there are probably many flags on the lunar surface and they're exclusively military / private contractor related. That rubbish they showed to the public in 1969 starring Neil Actor and Buzz A-hole was a half cocked joke. The amount of technical inconsistencies in their b-movie script are in their hundreds. Look at the size of the batteries on the Lunar Rover and then look at the power requirement of a Satellite broadcast unit. One is a 21st century truck sized setup, the other is a silver pram with some giant watch batteries wrapped in a silver blanket......
Explain the laser reflectors placed all over the surface so we can measure Earth to Moon distance. SOMEONE had to put then there. YOUR AN UN-PATRIOTIC DUMBASS, DON'T LIKE AMERICA.. THEN GET THE FUCK OUT, YOU MAKE ME SICK.
Telescopes can see bright objects very far away without resolving them. They show in a single pixel. The distance at which a telescope can resolve an object depends on the distance to the object AND its size. If the size-to-distance ratio is too small, the scope cannot see it, and that's the case for the Apollo objects seen from earth. They ARE seen quite nicely with telescopes in lunar orbit on LRO, which gives 1/2 m resolution or better.
Never heard of an engine burst zone, but it sounds fun. They did move the flag farther from the spacecraft on later missions to better handle the exhaust. In the first mission they stayed very close to the LM.
I live in Florida and I've been flying an American Flag from an 18' flagpole for the past 20 years . Because of the sun and the wind I have to replace my flags twice a year. My POV is that the negative effect of the sun has reduced the flags on the Moon to dust by now
@@angiewuenne1396 nope nylon, off the shelf. The landers will be gone in a million years or so as they are made of metal. They were photographed in 2006, and even the flags were still there.
Read a book to borrow someone else's brain to think for you, is one way to go through life. Or you can use you own brain to realize that, 1/6th gravity does not make your arms and legs move in slow-mo. nothing in physics will explain why when you double the moonwalk's videotape speed, that their arms will now be moving normal and not like a 1920s movie blurry fast speed, cuz you just doubled the speed. but yet doubling the speed only makes you realizes their arms were moving slow slow-mo for no reason.
The Traveler You think a CZcams conspiracy video is a better source of knowledge on physics. Have you ever studied physics outside of youtube ? Lol that's the rhetorical question, I know you haven't.
Quit throwing words you don't understand.. Conspiracy theory deals in theory. I am a realist dealing with what is real, as in physics is real. As soon as I talk about what is real your throwing the word conspiracy theory in my face.
What a waste of time all that and they don't give a clear answer. Basically ya have to go up there to find out, well that's a convenient excuse. Why haven't we sent our rovers to the landing site?
@@SupaMan2122 Good point. I also has been asking this for many many years.... imagine to be the first country (besides USA ofc) to take close up pics & videos of the lander and the footprints claimed to be there
By the way, while I am not a space physicist I actually do know something about the Van Allen belts. I have worked on the design, construction and operation of several small spacecraft, and one of my first tasks 30 years ago was to investigate the effect of Van Allen belt radiation on computer RAM chips.
Anyone who understands optics (which apparently doesn't include you) can easily figure out for themselves that the HST lacks the resolution needed to see the Apollo artifacts, even with the moon at perigee. But who needs the HST to look at the moon when we have a much closer telescope in lunar orbit that shows the artifacts very nicely? Of course, even if the HST could see the Apollo artificts you'd dismiss it just as you dismiss the LRO images, and with no better reason.
@@CodGeronimo LOL, that was a good comment! I don't understand these people who think that thousands of people could keep a secret as big as what they want to believe. Couldn't happen. And THAT's my proof of us going to the moon. I don't need any friggin scientific proof. Just that people can't keep their mouths shut about shit. So, yeah, we went to the moon.
It's interesting you should say that when they found the Mariners seven they brought the lens back and bacteria was rejuvenated from somebody sneezing on the lens here on Earth when it was first developed so bacteria was able to survive in a vacuum radiation field environment I think they could have come up with some material that of the flag to make it indoor all that you just mentioned
Mojoe they have cheap cameras that can zoom in pretty deep into the moon. To tell me nasa or any other space program can’t zoom in that far into the moon is bullshit
@@camtwan1 Unfortunately, optical magnification has some well defined limits. At some point we hit problems like the wavelength of light, for instance.
The smallest possible thing Hubble can see on the moon is about 328 feet across or the length of a football field. While impressive feat of resolution, no Apollo spacecraft comes anywhere near that size. Every piece of man-made hardware is below the space telescope’s resolution limit. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), flying only 31 miles high above the moon’s surface, it snapped a set of newly-released photos of the Apollo landing sites that plainly show the U.S. flags planted by the astronauts.
You understand, that that scene is filmed with the 16 mm film camera at low speed (to conserve film), right??? When played up, they move waay too fast.
I'm calling bs unless someone can explain this to me. how is it that we discovered Kepler-452b which is 8,230,075,522,457,050 miles away but we can't see if the flags are on the moon which is about 240,000 miles away..? doesn't seem reasonable
+DioGo how does that make sense? the moon gets fully lit . no matter how small those things are if we can see 1400 light years away we should be able to see a flag on the moon . like I said not only did we find a planet 1400 light years away but we we're able to establish that life is sustainable and water exists on it. saying not enough light emits off a flag pole only 250,000 miles away doesn't seem reasonable.
+Shadow Suave :1,400 Ly is a very long distance and even planets cannot be seen as discs at this distance, even with the Hubble. The Hubble directly imaged a planet around Fomalhaut b which is just 25 ly distant and all it saw was a couple of pixels. What Kepler is detecting is the dimming of starlight using a photometer, not an optical telescope. It sees transiting planets as starlight dimming, not entire planetary discs. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) image some of the artifacts on the moon from 15 miles up. The flags stand vertically so they'd be very difficult to see since you'd be looking straight down on them. If Kepler 452b were where the moon is, telescopes would see it in great detail but not enough resolution to see flag sized objects. Instead of calling BS on something your demonstrating you may not understand, why not search the web on telescopes and their capabilities and limitations?
+J Dean I said unless someone can explain and you explained ; please excuse my ignorance. and thank you for your reply Ive always wondered how they detect things that far away. it's amazing to me ; I'll have to read more in depth on this.
I ask myself why don't other Americans find it strange like myself that when the moon landings were so called being transmitted back to Earth live how in the world did we have a camera outside of the lunar lander when Armstrong comes out of the capsule on that famous iconic moment of coming down the stairs how was that camera there if it's our first time on the moon?
@@texmex9721 my mistake I should have clarified myself I absolutely believe we have gone to space but I just don't believe in the footage that they show us is actual space missions footage at the time we were in an arms race and we were trying to push American exceptionalism to the fullest and American I want to make sure that we left the statement of American superiority over the Russian our government was not going to run the risk and lose the space race when America was just taking their defeat from a 3rd world country Vietnam and let's not forget that the space missions were intended to bring American morale back up and to try to unite everyone something positive for the decade that was very covered with blood of war
@@brandonjimenez902 I do think the politics of the time were a huge driving factor. But I do think the missions were real and the video, audio, movie and still camera film is legitimate. I also think that one (of several) primary purposes of the Space program was development of space based military capability. Which is not to say each NASA employee felt he was developing weapons. I mean the huge advances in ICBM technology that paralleled Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, were not coincidental. In any case what do you think was not possible, the transmission of live video/audio?
nyeusi utawala clearly we had a lot more money to spend on Space Explorations back in the 60's. Ever since the budget cuts, NASA has started to waste less money.
They should have thought to put a big marker of some sort on the moon that way we could see it with a telescope from earth , that would’ve been the ultimate proof .
If you had told them back then that today a small group of bitter middle aged white guys would claim it did not happen, I think they would have said. So what? Which is kind of the reaction today.
optical supersaturation. the cross hatches were etched on the glass filter. Sometimes there's enough light in regions of a shot to overbleed one or two, but not others and the developer doesn't resolve that fine line. Chemistry. Your eye will do it. Sometimes it sees a scratch on your glasses or windshield, and sometimes the retina won't pick it up. Chemistry.
+S Tho Although I didn't ask the question. I appreciate you explaining that and giving an answer. It's something I've wondered before as well. Your explanation makes complete sense.
Dai Jones I'd add, who was it the caused the camera to pan upwards as the supposed LEM took off. I mean it's the only suposed video of all the supposed videos that depict any panning. It's hard to believe, that the one and only camera that had the capability of remote panning was only utilized for one sequencs of video's.
" I mean it's the only suposed video of all the supposed videos that depict any panning. " - You are badly misinformed, William. The t.v. camera was mounted on the rovers from Apollo 15 -17 and could pan both horizontally and vertically. There is plenty of panning throughout those excursions. The vertical tilt on Apollo 15's ended up breaking at some point though.
@@nordineaouidad he's a damn liar.. I live in California and fly a flag everyday from a 10' flagpole and due to weathering I need to replace the flag every 2 years, I figure that flag on the moon was dust by 1980
It looks like the USA had class & respected international relations then. We had self respect, unlike now when we pull out of international treaties, like the Iran treaty, simply to appease Isreal. Im jewish & I think pulling out of the Iran deal is ridiculous! On my original point, THANK YOU to ALL the brave men & women who made our dream of going to the moon possible! They are the TRUE American heroes! They came & left in peace & did what they as a matter of national pride & international benefit.
We need the 60s technology to land on the moon again
1960s tech like:
The first video game console. ...
The first computer mouse. ...
Light Emitting Diodes. ...
Dynamic Random Access Memory. ...
Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. ...
UNIX.
@@DeputyNordburg Well if you want to replay history..then yes using all that used NASA tech from the late 60's and early 70's would be right on course for returning us to the Moon.....but just show us the $$$$$$$$...
@Mr Natty Gains You can'y compare something that can be cheaply produced in mass by cheap labor to flying missions to our Moon...
@Mr Natty Gains Space craft just by definination of what they are and the environment in which they are expected to operate..are in my opinion the most costly machines manufactured by man..
ali alobad brilliant!👍
I read that all 6 American flags on the moon have turned completely white.
Now everyone thinks the French landed there.
French flag is blue white red, not only white! 😑
@@00great226 He talks about the fact that France is always waving a white flag(surrendering) during wars.
@@00great226 r/woooosh
They surrendered.
@goodfella21f and a bunch of lushes. Winos and winas.
Start of video: Are the Flags still there ?
End of video: Are the Flags still there ?
lol
Yes! At the beginning of the video I was sure they would fly to the moon and check.
Because the whole purpose of the piece, was to make you feel as though this was an empty gesture rather than a patriotic milestone.
It’s because the flags were never there to begin with, it’s impossible to go to the moon
@@roosterbooster2353 that is debateable but I do understand your point
“Are the flags still there?”
“Yes, but no, but yes”
*said while shaking head
I was going to make a flat earth joke but pretty sure most of you guys will take it serious.
How is the earth flat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's obviously kite shaped duh because at the peak shows Antarctica which everyone knows it's at the top!♦
Stupid cointelpro BS. Man has known the earth is round since 400 BC.
Flat Earth is not about the shape of the Earth. It's just a cry for attention. Those folks don't know or care what the shape is, and are in no way effected by it.
@@texmex9721 finally someone gets it
Do it. Bet you wont lol
2014: flat earth believers
2028: flat moon believers
Why 2028?? I believe the sun and moon are both flat
Ok boomer
Actually that fake moonwhere they fake landed is flat because they recorded that video on a flat beach somehwere in earth ahha
@@ArjanTV ok boomer
Wasnt time machines released to the public in 2028? Oh wait I'm still in 2020 shit
*are the flags left in the moon still there? *
We Know what a freaking flag is but can anyone answer me straight is the flag still there yes or no that's it
No
Fernando Valencia Yes they’re still there
No it was never there. Like Buzz told that 12 year old girl “we never went”
@@yannickleroux3212 how do You know that. Did you visit there. Oh last vacation you visited there.
@@fernandovalencia3542 have you?
The rationalization I like best is... We didn't have the technology to fake it, but we DID have the technology to do it. Therefore , it must be real.
I like that they went and just said fuck the nay-sayers. Fuck the people who said they couldn't do it, and the loosers that say they didn't. Best part of it to me.
Not a rationalization but a contradiction in terms, the premise does not work. Therefore, no such conclusion can be made, that being said, the conclusion between the two actually would be the opposite. A true use of a sound rationale.
The shadow of the A12 flag can still be seen in recent LRO images of the site, closely matching pictures taken on the surface. The A11 flag shadow is gone as expected since Buzz Aldrin reported that it fell over at LM ascent. I think the other 4 flags (their shadows, actually) are still visible in the LRO images.
Flag fell in surface Apollo 11
Neil Armstrong also planted items representing the other countries involved in the NASA missions, or the race to the moon. He changed the mission badge to represent a peaceful missions, placing an olive branch at the foot of the eagle.
LOL go buy a nikon p900 and zoom in on the moon and then tell me they left something on the moon the alarm should have went off when they so called the moon from the white house in the 70's
@@cuttinup7777 that’s right. Even today you can’t call a cell phone from a land line. That technology is decades away. You’d need to solder 2 wires together back then. No way.
@@cuttinup7777 that’s a good one!!! 🤣
Pourquoi l'ombre du vaisseau sur la lune ne bouge pas de 1 millimetre pendant la video tournée pendant 1 heure sur la lune ? l ombre ne bouge pas sur la lune comme sur la terre ???
Sure he did. Bs
imagine if some other nation goes to the apollo 11 landing site, and out of respect raises the fallen flag back to its place.....
flag , there is a flag ?
@@timi3663 Not a flag six U.S. flags in total.
Think the legs have some dust in them by now?
:D just imagine it and try seeing the point for yourself @Jimmy Green
Nobody was on the moon. No video showing the inside of the LEM during ascent or descent. Total hoax.
Wait i was just thinking about this and then it got on my recomended? Is youtube run by aliens with high tech?
Giant Dad no it was in your thoughts because CZcams programmed you to think about what they recommend to you. Kinda lucifer effect.
Giant Dad I think asses
Offcourse an alien from earth with having skills of algorithms combination of coding.. unfortunately they know bout all your data whatever you googled including incognito mode😂
Why don't they get one of those powerful spy telescopes and send photos of the flags? We probably never went to the moon.
Jacques Wilmore
www.flickr.com/photos/47833278@N02/17229073722/
Satisfied?
It’s so extraordinary that people 50 years ago actually walked on the moon. I can see why people choose not to believe it
It's so self-important to claim other people accomplishments like landing on the moon are fake. I can see why people with no accomplishments tell lies like this.
@Copypastable Except that event never happened. The press made it up as part of an attempt to undermine radio. But good point.
@Ray MASSIH No it didn't. The show had low ratings, very few people heard it. CBS didn't even broadcast it in many rural regions opting for other programing. Nobody thought it was real, at least there are no first hand accounts of anyone thinking it was real. There were people who said they were scared. People get scared in horror movies, it does not mean they thought it was real.
The newspaper industry essentially made it up to show it's advertisers, and regulators, that radio management was irresponsible and not to be trusted with anything serious like their main product, the news.
People were very accustomed to fictional programs on the radio at the time. It's nice to imagine some rube out in the sticks running out of his house in fear of aliens, but it's bullshit.
Nordburg you have no proof, only pathetic beliefs. I wish they would launch you into space
Trump 2020 tá ok?
Of course they are still there.
dang, it burned by ignition of gasses
lets turn back and put 20 feet over
Hard to burn something in space. Apollo 12+ did put it 20 feet farther away.
WE NEVERRRRRRR TOUCHED FOOT ON THE MOON...NEVER..
Danny Mccoy yes we did. We wouldn’t be able to create a moon like surface or look like shown in Apollo 11 video. Also if we could have faked it the lightning would be brighter than bright
@@earth7440 no we haven't we have boots on and a suit on the moon so no we haven't touched it yet
@@WilliamJohnson-jj9pjwell yeah i guess technically we haven’t touched the moon with our bare hands but we have touched it with gloves and a suit
That poor astronaut that was left behind on the moon to film the lunar liftoff... R.I.P..
Dillon Holcomb *Poor lunar rover and radio
Dillon Holcomb was thinking the same thing
T N
It's just the camera being controlled on Earth (I initially thought it was a person, but it was debunked.)
Razor Tanner oh yeah of course it is lol the technology in the late 60’s and 70’s was definitely great enough to have a camera on the moon remotely controlled from earth. What a load of absolute crap.
Razor Tanner you’re correct.. the cameras were invented. But were they really talking live from the moon back down to earth? You believe that? I can’t get a signal in a concrete stairwell
Space is SOOOO gorgeous
Answered questions I never knew I had.
I recall hearing the question about the purpose of the American flag on the moon in 1969 to Buzz Aldrin at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. He snapped a quick answer "It was a present for the Russians - in case they ever landed and had any doubts that we got there first!"
Вопрос простой. А почему сейчас не летайте на луну??? Я думаю что это всё фейк.
@@user-yg8bx6ww9d lol if it was all faked then why didn't your pos country go up and prove us wrong?
@@imnotfeelingit207 я не знаю почему. Факт то, что досихпор никто не летает на другую планету. Значит это досихпор не возможно.
@@user-yg8bx6ww9d It's because since 1972 NASA couldn't afford it until now
@@raptorwhite6468 спасибо вам большое за ответ. Но ваш ответ не убедительно. Думаю вы сами понимаете что они не были там.
Dont let this distract you from the fact that the moon is made of cheese
GREEN cheese. Get the important aspects right. 😉
I thought the moon was made of Tofu, Alex
It depends whether you have gone over to the Dark Side.
Jajajajajajajajajajajaa
aleX NG Mice
Ive got this with so much things like where is the piano where Freddie Mercury played on with live aid
Michael Collins and aldrin and so on are still alive and the giant leap was made RIP commander Armstrong
these comments are more interesting than the video!
exactly, the comments are more entertaining
😈👿😝😒⛪
Eric R. Very true
I thought we never went to the moon?
aleksandras corner Super intelligent Russians must not be taught proper grammar in school. Punctuation needs serious work there as well, sizzlechest.
I'm amazed of all the experts of the moon who haven't made it out of there dads basement yet.
ditto.
their
Fred Flinstoned i bet you're one of them
How about a 28 year career Radiologist who calls bullshit on these _"Landings"_ because of the Deadly belts of Radiation surrounding earth's atmosphere Dr. Van Allen discovered in 1957???
P Mushrush they're still smarter than you xD
Thanks for this... I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience... I hope one day the Apollo sites become a tourist attraction..🇳🇿
The flag is still in the studio where Stanley Kubrick had shot the funny moon landing cute movie on earth.
2:25 Yes, she did say there were six flags on the moon. But two of them were knock down.
Toonami30 wow this is an ancient comment from 6 years ago damn
Ikr
lmao
Psssstttt...Camera crew stole 2 of them for souvenirs ;)
Malfunction Junction Noice b8 m8
Need to build some highways up there ideal for motorcycle riding. No wind
At 1/6 gravity, a bump would launch you several hundred feet.
They were never there in the first place
"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond the problem is that we don't have the technology to do that anymore we used to, but we destroyed that technology" - Don Pettit LOL
@Wthrwse He says the people and expertise to built the old tech is gone. The hardware itself is sitting in Museums.
That's because the United States space program was actually a German space program under the United States flag with former Nazi's running the entire operation. The Germans were #1.
@@TrakSpock1 As many as 1 in 400 people at NASA were German.
@Wthrwse Study up on operation paperclip b4 u call ppl stupid.
@Wthrwse The Massachusetts instute of Technology was founded in 60s so I think they did have it. 1861 to be exact.
"On the bill you stated that the flag cost over $10,000, not 10 cents. You needed the Krypton resistant material, remember?"
Krypton is a planet. If you mean the material, it is "kryptonite". And why would I pay 10,000 USD for a flag - that is almost as expensive as the coffee makers that the USAF once bought. They cost 16,000 USD - and that was almost 10 years later.
Take a shot every time you see a flat-earther in the comment section
lol
You don't have to believe in flat earth to think they faked the moon landings. Besides thrust and combustion being impossible in a vacuum, even NASA admits they can't go past low earth orbit.
RIP
greebuh cant get past low earth orbit with current technology*
Let alone 1960's tech**
Nah the aliens thought it was a snack so then the government hid them in Area 51
Dude, they were never there. 👌
Any aliens reading this??
My demon is here.Wont leave.Holy ghost scares him tho.
Why not? You have.
@Silvio Manuel Not me. I am not here.
yes alien eat you hahaha
I have a green card.
The janitor moved them to the storage room but he wiped the windows very good and there is stain on the rags
Ultraviolet light is hell on nylon. Those flags are ashes by now.
the flags are in Area 51 not the moon
I ain’t sure if you joking
tin foil hat alert
Justin Parkman
I agree
Blue Bleeder spastics
In fact their in my arsehole.
Flags on the moon here is a little reality ..... One has to go to the Moon first. The first Two did not survive the ignition gases, yet they did not disturb any section of the so-called Moon surface I find that amazing.
With regards to your remark - 'The first Two did not survive the ignition gases', what are you even talking about?
Moon sand is not a fine powdery loose sand like we have here. The ignitiin gasses blew off a fine layer pretty quickly, but after that, its packed down pretty good.
No, because nobody has ever gone there.
@@ave-6130 That was harsh but got me like 🤣🤣🤣
how would u know that?
The way the astronauts jump on the lunar surface is more amusing !
Yes! When they speed the film up you can tell it is fake because they move too fast!
Earth needs a flag. we should have a flag that represents the whole earth not just a single country.
Why else did they make the national anthem
. That our flag was still there
The flags are in storage in the Aliens garage! 😝 lol
😂😂😂😂hahahahha
They was snatching em like trump signs!
@Greezy Mcgill you didn't get the joke
@Greezy Mcgill the fact we are aliens ourselves, we just decided to go with the name humans/homosapiens
Excellent information. I got some of those questions myself
It was a focus area that was given 100% approval, so the best minds and skilled ballsy pilots came together and accomplished this amazing mission to the moon. We never went back because it was no longer a priority.
9 manned missions went, 6 landed, and 44 unmanned missions followed some going on right now. Seems like a lot of going back.
No flags were ever there
Deep thinking.
@Sinjin Smyth no. I think they're really funny, especially when they attract a mindless moron like you.
_"No flags were ever there"_
In the 1970's this was probably true. Since then it has become quite apparent that the various contractors that make up the MIC, have created some extremely sophisticated weapons and technologies. I mean we all watched clear evidence of 50th Space Wing (USAF) using a low earth orbit platform to dispose of millions of tons of gypsum, steel, office furniture, bathrooms, people and ... aeroplane wrecks. But officially this technology still _doesn't exist_ . Likewise the 1980's saw literally hundreds of reports of giant triangular anti gravity stealth vehicles in NATO countries, in the run up to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the beginning of Perestroyka. But apparently all the policemen and airforce pilots who saw them were all on crack or something, because officially this technology _doesn't exist_ .
Ronald Reagan started shooting his mouth off about dangerous forces offworld and people wondered if he was also on crack, or maybe just drunk. Turns out he'd already pushed the SDI program through without any form of oversight and from the moment he realised what he had done, the rogue elephant in the room was (and still is) directly over everyone's head.
Anyway, the point is that there are probably many flags on the lunar surface and they're exclusively military / private contractor related.
That rubbish they showed to the public in 1969 starring Neil Actor and Buzz A-hole was a half cocked joke. The amount of technical inconsistencies in their b-movie script are in their hundreds. Look at the size of the batteries on the Lunar Rover and then look at the power requirement of a Satellite broadcast unit. One is a 21st century truck sized setup, the other is a silver pram with some giant watch batteries wrapped in a silver blanket......
so you wipe your mouth after you use the restroom?
Explain the laser reflectors placed all over the surface so we can measure Earth to Moon distance. SOMEONE had to put then there. YOUR AN UN-PATRIOTIC DUMBASS, DON'T LIKE AMERICA.. THEN GET THE FUCK OUT, YOU MAKE ME SICK.
Telescopes can see bright objects very far away without resolving them. They show in a single pixel. The distance at which a telescope can resolve an object depends on the distance to the object AND its size. If the size-to-distance ratio is too small, the scope cannot see it, and that's the case for the Apollo objects seen from earth. They ARE seen quite nicely with telescopes in lunar orbit on LRO, which gives 1/2 m resolution or better.
fake! this is an old controversy but no one cares to show proof..fake
@@eFutureTechOnline Show proof of what? Telescopes can't see tiny stuff really far away? Why don't you show proof they can?
Yes they are still there but in various conditions. Where else would they be?
wow,answer turned into a newscast special,finally! got to the answer of the question!
kubrick keep the flag as a souvenir.
HAHA! PERFECT!
Diavolakii .7. or maybe spielberg
DIAVOLAKII P1926 you’re right
Are you a dumb Russian idiot who still cannot accept the reality of American victory in space race 50 years after the event?
He also keeps your brain as souvenir
To save you 3 minutes and 40 seconds...
Yes
Thank you, very helpful
No one ever landed on The Moon.. ❤️
Astronauts did not you
Is there a little man in this anchor man's head pulling levers?
“Just. Waving in the breeze” 😂 LMFAO really? So it’s windy in space? And look how they hop around bruh 😭😭😭😭😭
Lextouchbands 6 Buddy they have a rod at the top because there is no wind on the Moon
@@robertsharpe8593
Watch 2:37
Anas Ameerkannu thats the wind of the space ship
@@staggeringbeauty9635
If Earth i can agree, but remember, it's Moon no Air then how the Wind?
It is windy in space.... I think...
Probably not
they could just Put the flag outside the engine burst zone.
No otherwise hoax ppl could proof it was actually fake kappa
They werent gonna stray that far from the LEM.
Never heard of an engine burst zone, but it sounds fun. They did move the flag farther from the spacecraft on later missions to better handle the exhaust. In the first mission they stayed very close to the LM.
Nordburg you must have been there
@@paulmayfield9709 That is a fallacy.
I live in Florida and I've been flying an American Flag from an 18' flagpole for the past 20 years .
Because of the sun and the wind I have to replace my flags twice a year.
My POV is that the negative effect of the sun has reduced the flags on the Moon to dust by now
Thought they were aluminum? Not material. So are the modules dust as well? We have no scrap up there? The LEM took off leaving their base module.
@@angiewuenne1396 nope nylon, off the shelf. The landers will be gone in a million years or so as they are made of metal. They were photographed in 2006, and even the flags were still there.
@@DeputyNordburg link
@@Gameboy-Unboxings search
All the way to the moon and back on just one tank.
And in a vehicle made of sheet metal, foil and tarps and it survived reentry also.
I think I'll die in confusion....... How's this possible 😮
Almost 500,000 mile round trip.
No... the aliens took them for souvenirs... and to make T shirts for the kids!
nytom4info lol haha
The flags are not there, because as quoted by Buzz Aldrin, (we didn't go there) and that's the way it happened...
Paul Meredith your gay
”So say does that star spangled banner yet wave, over the land of the free, and the moon of the brave”
the flags are still in place on the movie sets where they were left,
If only conspiracy theorists would read as many books as CZcams videos they watch, that would be great.
Read a book to borrow someone else's brain to think for you, is one way to go through life. Or you can use you own brain to realize that, 1/6th gravity does not make your arms and legs move in slow-mo. nothing in physics will explain why when you double the moonwalk's videotape speed, that their arms will now be moving normal and not like a 1920s movie blurry fast speed, cuz you just doubled the speed. but yet doubling the speed only makes you realizes their arms were moving slow slow-mo for no reason.
The Traveler You think a CZcams conspiracy video is a better source of knowledge on physics. Have you ever studied physics outside of youtube ? Lol that's the rhetorical question, I know you haven't.
Quit throwing words you don't understand.. Conspiracy theory deals in theory. I am a realist dealing with what is real, as in physics is real. As soon as I talk about what is real your throwing the word conspiracy theory in my face.
The Traveler You're an idiot. I have a feeling this isn't the first time you hear this.
First time....
You say I'm not to bright. But so far you haven't pin pointed one mis sentence I stated. It's those things that end in a period.
Neil Armstrong was never the first man on the moon he was the second the camera man was first!
The selfie stick he released while on the ladder, you mean...
OMG NASA forgot that every video camera needs a guy there to do... something... Without that guy, it can't work! cause of science or something...
ROFL
I have a drone and I keep looking for where the little guy who operates the camera sits. He must be in there right? OMG some people are retarded.
Brilliant Observation Samuel. LOL
It's 2021 now and I'm still here 💯📎
The real question is "is there a flag on the moon"
What a waste of time all that and they don't give a clear answer. Basically ya have to go up there to find out, well that's a convenient excuse. Why haven't we sent our rovers to the landing site?
@@SupaMan2122 Good point. I also has been asking this for many many years.... imagine to be the first country (besides USA ofc) to take close up pics & videos of the lander and the footprints claimed to be there
By the way, while I am not a space physicist I actually do know something about the Van Allen belts. I have worked on the design, construction and operation of several small spacecraft, and one of my first tasks 30 years ago was to investigate the effect of Van Allen belt radiation on computer RAM chips.
What became of it
Anyone who understands optics (which apparently doesn't include you) can easily figure out for themselves that the HST lacks the resolution needed to see the Apollo artifacts, even with the moon at perigee.
But who needs the HST to look at the moon when we have a much closer telescope in lunar orbit that shows the artifacts very nicely?
Of course, even if the HST could see the Apollo artificts you'd dismiss it just as you dismiss the LRO images, and with no better reason.
Love Axel Rod...and GNR
Richard Nixon was able to speak to Neil Armstrong from a phone in the White House LOL
😂😂😂😂
@@CodGeronimo LOL, that was a good comment! I don't understand these people who think that thousands of people could keep a secret as big as what they want to believe. Couldn't happen. And THAT's my proof of us going to the moon. I don't need any friggin scientific proof. Just that people can't keep their mouths shut about shit. So, yeah, we went to the moon.
Idaho Ranch Girl: What secret? No video of the inside of the LEM during ascent or descent. No moon landing, It was a hoax.
3:30 bars.
UV radiation would have disintegrated them at some point
It's interesting you should say that when they found the Mariners seven they brought the lens back and bacteria was rejuvenated from somebody sneezing on the lens here on Earth when it was first developed so bacteria was able to survive in a vacuum radiation field environment I think they could have come up with some material that of the flag to make it indoor all that you just mentioned
Earth has atmosphere Thomas Norton moon does not
Are you sure about that? disintegrated? I doubt it
one of them had to tend the flag so the other could putt in
Oh good to know, I always just thought the aliens threw them away after we left.
so you're saying that we don't have telescopes powerful enough to zoom in on the moons surface...
Cause it’s fake
@@camtwan1 yeah, because making a telescope that can see 230000 miles away is so simple
Mojoe they have cheap cameras that can zoom in pretty deep into the moon. To tell me nasa or any other space program can’t zoom in that far into the moon is bullshit
@@camtwan1 Unfortunately, optical magnification has some well defined limits. At some point we hit problems like the wavelength of light, for instance.
The smallest possible thing Hubble can see on the moon is about 328 feet across or the length of a football field. While impressive feat of resolution, no Apollo spacecraft comes anywhere near that size. Every piece of man-made hardware is below the space telescope’s resolution limit. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), flying only 31 miles high above the moon’s surface, it snapped a set of newly-released photos of the Apollo landing sites that plainly show the U.S. flags planted by the astronauts.
We never went to begin with!! 3:07 is he skipping that fast out of space? FOH
You understand, that that scene is filmed with the 16 mm film camera at low speed (to conserve film), right???
When played up, they move waay too fast.
YDDES If you really think we went to the moon God Bless you bro LOL 😂
Sorry, I have no interest of trying to communicate with stupids.
YDDES would be nice for you to be in Miami so I can slap the bitch out of you
These are in some where the studio. Just check these over there. You may call it moon.
^^^^ see above for another uneducated moron. "I'm smarter than you.. I KNOW it was FAKED" .
X-FILES THAT'S ALL I GOTTA SAY
WAIT.. who filmed the lift off?!
Ed Fendell.
No, it was Chuck Norris.
System who? It was a camera mounted on the moon rover
Jesus
*O H S H I T W H E R E S J I M ?*
I'm calling bs unless someone can explain this to me. how is it that we discovered Kepler-452b which is 8,230,075,522,457,050 miles away but we can't see if the flags are on the moon which is about 240,000 miles away..? doesn't seem reasonable
Because they dont reflect enough light from sun to be captured by telescopes, and they are just like 6ft tall
+DioGo how does that make sense? the moon gets fully lit . no matter how small those things are if we can see 1400 light years away we should be able to see a flag on the moon . like I said not only did we find a planet 1400 light years away but we we're able to establish that life is sustainable and water exists on it. saying not enough light emits off a flag pole only 250,000 miles away doesn't seem reasonable.
+Shadow Suave can you see the cells on a leaf with a telescope?
+Shadow Suave :1,400 Ly is a very long distance and even planets cannot be seen as discs at this distance, even with the Hubble. The Hubble directly imaged a planet around Fomalhaut b which is just 25 ly distant and all it saw was a couple of pixels. What Kepler is detecting is the dimming of starlight using a photometer, not an optical telescope. It sees transiting planets as starlight dimming, not entire planetary discs. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) image some of the artifacts on the moon from 15 miles up. The flags stand vertically so they'd be very difficult to see since you'd be looking straight down on them. If Kepler 452b were where the moon is, telescopes would see it in great detail but not enough resolution to see flag sized objects. Instead of calling BS on something your demonstrating you may not understand, why not search the web on telescopes and their capabilities and limitations?
+J Dean I said unless someone can explain and you explained ; please excuse my ignorance. and thank you for your reply Ive always wondered how they detect things that far away. it's amazing to me ; I'll have to read more in depth on this.
Our friendly neighborhood tief has that flag in our local pawnshop.
America acts like they are the only ones who raise flags during critical moments in history.
Dude it’s literally the moon they are talking about they’re not saying something like the US raised the flag over the Reichstag in 1945.
That Guy obviously don’t get offended now.
I ask myself why don't other Americans find it strange like myself that when the moon landings were so called being transmitted back to Earth live how in the world did we have a camera outside of the lunar lander when Armstrong comes out of the capsule on that famous iconic moment of coming down the stairs how was that camera there if it's our first time on the moon?
Brandon, do you really think NASA can build Space Craft, but can't figure out how to attach a video camera outside and run the wire inside?
@@texmex9721 my mistake I should have clarified myself I absolutely believe we have gone to space but I just don't believe in the footage that they show us is actual space missions footage at the time we were in an arms race and we were trying to push American exceptionalism to the fullest and American I want to make sure that we left the statement of American superiority over the Russian our government was not going to run the risk and lose the space race when America was just taking their defeat from a 3rd world country Vietnam and let's not forget that the space missions were intended to bring American morale back up and to try to unite everyone something positive for the decade that was very covered with blood of war
@@brandonjimenez902 I do think the politics of the time were a huge driving factor. But I do think the missions were real and the video, audio, movie and still camera film is legitimate. I also think that one (of several) primary purposes of the Space program was development of space based military capability. Which is not to say each NASA employee felt he was developing weapons. I mean the huge advances in ICBM technology that paralleled Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, were not coincidental.
In any case what do you think was not possible, the transmission of live video/audio?
@@texmex9721 Amerikan gov are the biggest liars on the planet. Gullible people like you validate their existence.
@@howlinsg1968 Sad emotional people like you need to insult people to feel good. I''m not even American. Wake up.
I can tell you that the flag is still there....... In the Hollywood studio basement
Brilliant!!!’ Brilliant news thank you!!!’
If the orange pumpkin went up, he could TWEET and the universe could judge the content....
Clearly the most advanced technology was in the 1960s. LOL....
nyeusi utawala clearly we had a lot more money to spend on Space Explorations back in the 60's. Ever since the budget cuts, NASA has started to waste less money.
Now 2018 they cant make that kind of advanced technology thats why they cant go to moon anymore right now..
Jason Sonic because of *Cash*
yeah, nasa clearly needs money, of course they do need it.
If you understood the technological revolution, your opinion would be better informed.
Just insert the earth flag, not the countries flag
So, I get the space ship on last friday & SATURDAY WITH MY FAMILY. SO I REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT THE SOLAR SYSTEM FROM LAST SEPTEMBER 2017.
They should have thought to put a big marker of some sort on the moon that way we could see it with a telescope from earth , that would’ve been the ultimate proof .
If you had told them back then that today a small group of bitter middle aged white guys would claim it did not happen, I think they would have said. So what? Which is kind of the reaction today.
I got a question. Why is the third cross mark on the right at 2:36 was behind the flag? I don't have any idea why.
optical supersaturation. the cross hatches were etched on the glass filter. Sometimes there's enough light in regions of a shot to overbleed one or two, but not others and the developer doesn't resolve that fine line. Chemistry.
Your eye will do it. Sometimes it sees a scratch on your glasses or windshield, and sometimes the retina won't pick it up. Chemistry.
+S Tho Although I didn't ask the question. I appreciate you explaining that and giving an answer. It's something I've wondered before as well. Your explanation makes complete sense.
good catch it's behind flag lol. solo fake
It is impossible to get in front of the cross on a photo unless it was doctored!! Wake up people it's fake!!
Because most people are stupid and will believe anything they are told.
Who operated the camera for the "what a liftoff" shot?
Dai Jones I'd add, who was it the caused the camera to pan upwards as the supposed LEM took off. I mean it's the only suposed video of all the supposed videos that depict any panning. It's hard to believe, that the one and only camera that had the capability of remote panning was only utilized for one sequencs of video's.
Dai Jones yeah right? The camera even follows the lunar module as it was taking off😂
His name was Ed Fendell.
" I mean it's the only suposed video of all the supposed videos that depict any panning. " - You are badly misinformed, William. The t.v. camera was mounted on the rovers from Apollo 15 -17 and could pan both horizontally and vertically. There is plenty of panning throughout those excursions. The vertical tilt on Apollo 15's ended up breaking at some point though.
Cameraman #4 did, to where he exited the sound stage and was to never be seen again....spoooky....lolz
The real question is, how long will they be there?
I saw the flags through my telescope, so I can say for sure they're there.
really!?!?, can you share some footage please?
@@nordineaouidad he's a damn liar.. I live in California and fly a flag everyday from a 10' flagpole and due to weathering I need to replace the flag every 2 years, I figure that flag on the moon was dust by 1980
@@igotthejuice2090 the moon doesnt have terrible weather. It barely has an atmosphere.
@@BB-el2js yea it should be bleached white from the sun than
ya boi Sosa stfu kid
This is actually the second flag on moon .
First one was of russia shot from space.
Lots and lots of flags on lots of unamanned missions before this one.
I don't think any of the other flags are ever really going to be known about, because they weren't placed on the moon by a person.
It looks like the USA had class & respected international relations then. We had self respect, unlike now when we pull out of international treaties, like the Iran treaty, simply to appease Isreal. Im jewish & I think pulling out of the Iran deal is ridiculous! On my original point, THANK YOU to ALL the brave men & women who made our dream of going to the moon possible! They are the TRUE American heroes! They came & left in peace & did what they as a matter of national pride & international benefit.
Dr. Spectre they just want to undo everything that the black guy did. That's it.
Didn't one of the astronauts say when they left THE FORCE blew the flag THE 1st flag
We can send drones to Mars,but can't send to the moon..