Turbulent Flow: Moody Chart [Fluid Mechanics #41]

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
  • An introduction to the famous Moody Chart! We use the Moody Chart often to estimate frictional factors.
    To download the notes I use for these videos, please click the following link:
    docs.google.co...
    Make sure to click "File" and then "Download" if you would like to download the file. Feel free to share them however you want. I recommend having the notes alongside when viewing these videos.
    If you are enjoying these videos and finding them useful, please make sure to follow Simmy Sigma on Twitter at: @simmysigma
    💙 If you've found my content helpful and would like to support the channel, you can do so here: www.buymeacoff...
    📘 Find my Digital Engineering Paper Templates here: www.etsy.com/s...
    Lets spread education around the world!

Komentáře • 88

  • @howdduckjr
    @howdduckjr Před 8 lety +38

    The chart is for laminar, transitional, and turbulent flows. Laminar flow is a constant where the friction factor is no longer related to roughness "e". Transitional flow is the one where both Reynolds # and relative roughness e/D are used. For the turbulent flow condition the friction factor is no longer a function of the Reynolds number, which is why the curve flattens to e/D; the values are read straight across in the turbulent region. So really there are three ways to read off friction factors from this curve, not just the one you are presenting. In addition, it would be helpful to note that there are 3 different scales to get used to on the graph: e/D is a skewed bell curve of log scale, f is a bell curve of log scale, and Re is a log scale.

  • @Brauyin
    @Brauyin Před 5 lety +10

    Very nice video. Made me realize i didn't do it right in my exam yesterday. But now i know how to use it. Thanks :)

  • @birdsarentreal3054
    @birdsarentreal3054 Před 5 lety +38

    Thanks bruh 💙🌸
    Pray for me i have an exam tomorrow 💔🌚

  • @BadAssBerries27
    @BadAssBerries27 Před 11 lety +2

    Thanks this was clear. This deserves more views

  • @nandha0150
    @nandha0150 Před 8 lety +19

    Moody's chart can be used for laminar flows too, for calculating the pressure drop in fully developed flows..
    And Reynolds No. greater than 4000. Not 2000. 2000 - 4000 is Transient condition, as pointed out by many others..
    Kindly correct it.

  • @sumayyahabdulla288
    @sumayyahabdulla288 Před 3 lety

    Thank you so much, you have saved me a lot of stress :)
    - from a struggling Civil Eng student

    • @SimmySigma
      @SimmySigma  Před 3 lety +1

      Aw, I’m glad! You got this! I believe in you! 😎

  • @jackwhitehead4149
    @jackwhitehead4149 Před 4 lety +15

    Starts at 2:11, you're welcome

  • @missionfreelance4907
    @missionfreelance4907 Před rokem

    Hence, moody's chart is a graphical diagram consisting of three components. They are a frictional factor(f) to the left, Relative roughness to the right, and Reynold's number to the bottom. We usually have one or two of these values. Then, we use those values to find out the required unknown values (usually f), then we apply the required formulas.

  • @farisal-amer7635
    @farisal-amer7635 Před 8 lety +1

    Wonderfully explained! Thank you as always!

  • @andrewmoussa4688
    @andrewmoussa4688 Před 11 lety +16

    WHAT IF it wasn't perfectly on the line, let's say it was 0.003 and 2 x 10^5

    • @MelodyTadeoJ
      @MelodyTadeoJ Před 4 lety

      2:13 of this video explains: www.google.com/search?q=how+to+read+a+moody+diagram&rlz=1C1JZAP_enCA815CA815&oq=how+to+read+a+moody+diagram&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l2.3695j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#kpvalbx=_HV5DXo35HsfVtAa-2o2wBg27

    • @zvonimir-antestipic9025
      @zvonimir-antestipic9025 Před 4 lety

      @@MelodyTadeoJ Give link of concrete video, not bunch of it. Still not found way for 0.003

    • @MelodyTadeoJ
      @MelodyTadeoJ Před 4 lety

      @@zvonimir-antestipic9025 Even after opening the video this is the only URL that came up.

    • @MelodyTadeoJ
      @MelodyTadeoJ Před 4 lety +1

      @@zvonimir-antestipic9025 I think it was the same as this one: czcams.com/video/PgAXycpuZqM/video.html&feature=emb_title

    • @MelodyTadeoJ
      @MelodyTadeoJ Před 4 lety

      @@zvonimir-antestipic9025 Did you look at it?

  • @williamscott8961
    @williamscott8961 Před 4 lety

    Great Vid! Helped a lot

  • @Diablo3Movies
    @Diablo3Movies Před 10 lety

    Helps a lot. Gretz from germany!

  • @MauroVictor
    @MauroVictor Před 9 lety

    Thank you. That was a great explanation. Very clear.
    Thanks a lot

  • @nahalishh
    @nahalishh Před 3 lety

    so clear ,thanks

  • @pacificwanyo6810
    @pacificwanyo6810 Před 4 lety +1

    Thanks for this video..

  • @adamalmuhana7410
    @adamalmuhana7410 Před 3 lety

    This helped a lot ty 🙏

  • @MrMohitos
    @MrMohitos Před 6 lety

    Very good explanation, thank you!

  • @danielzhang3725
    @danielzhang3725 Před 10 lety

    Thanks. That was extremely informative.

  • @jafarialexander5105
    @jafarialexander5105 Před 2 lety

    Any videos on how to use the wholly turbulent flow line to find the frictional factor?

  • @NauTzZz
    @NauTzZz Před 8 lety +16

    at 0:28 you said if Re > 2000, flow is turbulent but it should be 4000. between that should be transitional.
    Thanks for the video

    • @SweRaider1993
      @SweRaider1993 Před 8 lety +5

      Different litterature tend to use different values depending on the context and how ideal the situation is. The transition can be anywhere between 1000 up to 5000. Reynolds originally found it to be around 2100. Most textbooks however say that the flow is unpredictable/transitional between 2000-3000. Your textbook may be focusing on a context where the flow is more unpredictable if the transition is between 2000-4000.

    • @shobharanipeddi4306
      @shobharanipeddi4306 Před 5 lety

      Re4000 laminar flow , 2000

  • @sabaajlouni2463
    @sabaajlouni2463 Před 10 lety

    Very helpful thanks a lot

  • @fizz1173
    @fizz1173 Před 10 lety

    thanks man, quite helpful

  • @HappySunflower997
    @HappySunflower997 Před 7 lety

    thank you for the video, it help me a lot :)

  • @aszxdwd
    @aszxdwd Před 7 lety

    thank you that was helpful for me

  • @samuelacheampong9391
    @samuelacheampong9391 Před 9 lety

    Perfect tutorial

  • @faridoondanesh5998
    @faridoondanesh5998 Před 5 lety

    thanks for the video.

  • @Sarah-dg1ow
    @Sarah-dg1ow Před 8 lety

    Very helpful, thank you

  • @birdsarentreal3054
    @birdsarentreal3054 Před 5 lety +5

    But if the pipes were "smooth" we directly use the first curved line "without using the coefficient of roughness".

  • @meltingpig
    @meltingpig Před 9 lety

    Simmy Sigma I like your simple formulaes which is easier to understand (School gave us long & complicated formulaes...). But i am a little confused now as i note that you are using moody diagram for use with darcy friction factor. However, i have a moody diagram with fanning friction factor. Will it affect any of the formulaes that you teach?

  • @assiyatarkany550
    @assiyatarkany550 Před 9 lety

    thanks it did help me really :)

  • @marlonsaveri
    @marlonsaveri Před 8 lety

    Thanks for the video. Question: "any turbulent flows" means "any liquid"? Liquid Nitrogen, for example? Or just water?

  • @akshayroy1762
    @akshayroy1762 Před 8 lety

    this helped me a lot :D thank you :)

  • @myanmar8dmusic722
    @myanmar8dmusic722 Před 8 lety +4

    But I want to know how to assume the frictional factor if only Roughness is given!!

  • @tommyvercetti419
    @tommyvercetti419 Před 9 lety +1

    thanks dude

  • @01olk
    @01olk Před 6 lety +1

    thank you

  • @jonathonjakobo
    @jonathonjakobo Před 9 lety

    thank you very clear :)

  • @FaReS4201
    @FaReS4201 Před 7 lety

    Thank you so much :)

  • @katherinastefani3112
    @katherinastefani3112 Před 6 lety

    thank you!!

  • @zahran00wolf
    @zahran00wolf Před 6 lety

    I have some calculation for my project which are re is 94 K and for Ks/D is 0.000047 but the corresponding value for f lies below the curve , so should i stick with the f= 0.25/(log10((ks/3.7D)+(5.74/Re^0.9)^2)))^2 ???

  • @jasper78138
    @jasper78138 Před 6 lety

    I thought u will discuss about nature of graph nd various regions

  • @sandarunavinda8343
    @sandarunavinda8343 Před 8 měsíci

    Thanks

  • @amjoyhihi2321
    @amjoyhihi2321 Před 8 lety

    so good

  • @jamesthorpe2359
    @jamesthorpe2359 Před 3 lety

    how would you find f if the relative roughness is 0?

  • @hamdanalharbi2206
    @hamdanalharbi2206 Před 8 lety

    +1 subscriber!!

  • @Matdogg2k
    @Matdogg2k Před 10 lety

    Why do the numbers on the horizontal axis (Above: VD and Below: Reynold's Number) repeat itself over and over? Which one do I choose? There's like 3 or 4 sets of the same numbers

    • @Matdogg2k
      @Matdogg2k Před 9 lety

      Justin Williams
      Thank you Justin

  • @hassanlive4
    @hassanlive4 Před 11 lety

    thanks, very helpful :))

  • @keshavgopaul5491
    @keshavgopaul5491 Před 5 lety +1

    what if relative roughness was 0.00008 ?

  • @ayyubgavandi5902
    @ayyubgavandi5902 Před 7 lety

    my consept not clear for nikurdse expriment plz say

  • @candycandy319
    @candycandy319 Před 6 lety

    what do u do for roughness number in between?

  • @BryanRodriguez-wj9ls
    @BryanRodriguez-wj9ls Před 6 lety +1

    How to begins at 2:39

  • @ilsAndrew
    @ilsAndrew Před 4 lety

    ty!

  • @Mrius86
    @Mrius86 Před 5 lety

    Thanks.

  • @xjosex64
    @xjosex64 Před 10 lety

    what are the bold curved lines for?

  • @muhammadismailmalaysia869

    thank bro..now I know to use moody chart

  • @bruva4manovamova
    @bruva4manovamova Před 11 lety

    what if we have a reynold's number equal to 2.10^4 and relative roughness of 0.008?
    do I follow the black line as it curves up or do I take the crossing of the vertical line at 2.10^4 and horizontal line at 0.008?
    thanks

    • @danod6123
      @danod6123 Před 4 měsíci

      I think if you follow the line you will be alright. Hope this helps - Dr.Dan 👍

  • @emanuelcastanho470
    @emanuelcastanho470 Před 6 lety +7

    Try with 1.25 velocity on youtube

    • @birdsarentreal3054
      @birdsarentreal3054 Před 5 lety

      @@cameronledoux95 *velocity ,so we don't use the term of "speed" in fluid mechanics :D

  • @Hidden-truth-revealed
    @Hidden-truth-revealed Před 2 lety

    Let me give you a good kiss bro 😘🤗. tomorrow is my paper and our sir just mentioned it.he did not make us understand.you helped me out.keep helping out people💖🇵🇰

    • @SimmySigma
      @SimmySigma  Před 2 lety +2

      Ah! I’m so happy that the content has helped you!! I’m glad you found the content useful and I’ll continue making sure I can produce more education content for students everywhere! 😊

  • @anuragkashyap2975
    @anuragkashyap2975 Před 6 lety

    nice elaboration , but 1.25 speed is better to understand

  • @arifmastor716
    @arifmastor716 Před 5 lety

    hmm . can't understand sir

  • @thanhle2560
    @thanhle2560 Před 7 lety +1

    Trời ơi. Sao lại nói tiếng anh.. Có ai cứu vớt tôi với.. Huhu.. K muốn học lại hoá học TP đâu

  • @user-jr1pj8tl5f
    @user-jr1pj8tl5f Před 7 lety

    А по русски?

  • @aysesaglam3295
    @aysesaglam3295 Před 6 lety

    hiç türk mühendis yok muuuu

  • @PCgamerChannel
    @PCgamerChannel Před 11 měsíci

    Awful the bottom part still confuses me "if you get 2(10^6) give an example of actually fucking finding it

  • @francismburu8227
    @francismburu8227 Před 7 lety

    Thanks a lot i hv benefited

  • @mustafacivil2
    @mustafacivil2 Před 4 lety

    thanks