Live! 2017 Mazda CX-9 0-60 MPH Review: How Fast is the New CX-9?
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 09. 2024
- ( www.TFLcar.com ) Live! 2017 Mazda CX-9 0-60 MPH Review: How Fast is the New CX-9?
( / tflcar ) Please visit to support TFLcar & TFLtruck.
Check us out on:
Facebook: ( / tfltruck )
Twitter: ( / tfltruck )
and now even Truck Videos on CZcams at:
The Fast Lane Truck ( / tflcar )
and classic cars as well at:
TFLClassics ( / classicsunleashed )
*TL;DR 9.2 seconds*
.. not sure why this needed a 13 minute video
Just so people are aware, Car & Driver and others got it to 60 in 7.2 sec in official settings. In case anyone thinks the 8 or 9 seconds is too slow.
mile above sea level, that's why
It matters, turbos don't eliminate altitude, they compensate but don't eliminate it completely. BTW it a recen car and driver comparison it got to 60 in 6.8s which is freaking fast for a 7 passenger vehicle
Andres Salazar lol with turboot doesn matter below 6000 feet. LOL.
They also had the warm air blowing during testing. With premium gas, I've gotten consistently 6.9 seconds on flat road, no pax. 2018 CX9 GT. Fun car!
I LOVE THAT CAR, i have a 2015 CX5 and it is great, the big brother does not disappoint
Hey Roman mica...u forgot to tell people that that u can put premium gas in the cx9 as well and the horsepower jumps up to 250. Not unless u didn't know that.
Nice to see somthing other than a semi constant flow of Chrysler products.
lol that heavy breathing when they do the 0-60 8:15
man, thats a nice looking interior!
Can you get a camera that does better then 480p if you are going to keep doing these video's ? I miss the 4K quality.
It's a CZcams thing with the livestreaming.
Nissan Rogue is a 4banger 3row but no turbo. The Volvo XC90 is nice but I've been hearing nothing but reliability nightmares on that thing.
That zero to 60 time, impressed me. I didn't know Mazda had a turbo 4 like this. Interesting.
great reviews all the the time miss the higher quality. still good job guys love the look, mpg, and room on it. plus loosing 1 mpg awd from Fwd its great to
Fabian Hernandez i
whats up with heavy breathing thru the nose straight onto the microphone?
I love the front end of it but the fog lights are too small. I like how the grill lights up at night!
You can get the new Explorer with the 2.3L EcoBoost. That would be a direct competitor.
Adam Walters not at all. The cx-9 is the competitor to the explorer.
Ford? Nah, lemon cars.
Lemon you say?
2004 f150 115,000 miles
Not one problem bought used
2005 mustang GT 145,000 miles
Not one problem bought new
2007 fusion SEL V6 100,000 miles
No problems bought new
FORD is the number one return buyers customer rating in the industry. "Have You Driven A FORD Lately?"
TNitro N Ford sucks. Until they get rid of the ecoboost wish is unreliable.
The EB was rough when it first came out, but right now it's pretty solid.
It was snowing like the clappers today.
I wished that you would have let Nathan finsh what he was saying at the end.
Pushing the CX-5 for the best of the Mazda SUV line-up. Not sure the 0-60mph is something that owners view as a critical feature
Have ya'll tested a 2018 Ford Explorer with the twin turbo 6 at altitude?
What do you think about cabin sound?
did you use premium or regular gas?
Dad’s only clicked this video.
How come other CZcams livestreams at 1080P? This one looks like 360P.
+Keith Ho because there's no high speed wifi at our track
im 6 foot..330...i fit in my 2012 crew durango in the third row.
2017 pilot 0-60 6.5
B , L or Forget it ?????
seems irrelevant to do 0-60 on a people hauler.
was this on premium fuel or regular?
Wouldn't make a difference to 60 mph. It's not using peak HP to get there. Only makes a difference revving it out at higher speeds.
@@Josh-179 20 more hp doesn't make a diff
cx9 than for everest 2005 /?
It far slower than the Honda pilot
tire warmer hahahahaha
No zoom zoom
The Nissan Pathfinder has a better interior!
Uhhhhhhhhhh... No.
LOL, not even close.
BryB looool this comment is funny
Nissan Pathfinder is the worst reliable and worst looking vehicle. Interior is really really bad. Nissan has to do something about the Pathfinder Asap! Murano though is very good!
BryB You win!
Second!
Audi Q7 has a 2.0t i4 engine and it's much better than this. Mazda is lazy with their interior tech.
Rice Tea, how is Audi's 2.0 better? For $10,000 more (base Q7 vs top line CX-9), you get 37 lb ft of torque less than the Mazda and about the same HP. More displacement in the Mazda could prove more reliable as well.
With Q7's price tag it better kick ass