Navy porn investigation has national security implications: Analyst | NewsNation Prime
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 06. 2024
- NewsNation national security analyst Tracy Walder is disturbed by the national security implications of someone being able to secretly video more than 100 Navy officers and sailors. She tells “NewsNation Prime” that someone putting cameras where they shouldn’t be is problematic. But she also expects prosecutors to focus on charges of lewd conduct, not security, once they identify a suspect.
"NewsNation Prime" is America’s source for unbiased news offering a full range of perspectives from across the U.S. Weekends starting at 7p/6C. #Prime
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
More from NewsNation: www.newsnationnow.com/
Get our app: trib.al/TBXgYpp
Find us on cable: trib.al/YDOpGyG
How to watch on TV or streaming: trib.al/Vu0Ikij
This is incredibly tragic for the poor sailors that were unaware they were being filmed. Monsters are everywhere.
Women are not assigned to sub service.
@@peekaboo6622 it's terrible for the men as well.
@@ashleypearson3846 I know. I was married to a submariner for 15 years.
@@peekaboo6622Is that what hubby told you..?
Ruh roh, Scoob, I sense an awkward conversation coming up. . .
@@peekaboo6622 I really hope they track this person down and they get serious time in jail
Sailors for 100’s of years knew better then to let a women on a ship a sea with men no wonder not suprised
You assume there are girls in the video.....Its the Navy bro......
😀😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
How naive are you? What did you expect would happen with men and women trapped on a naval vessel for months at a time?
I am not condoning it, but how could anyone be shocked?
We're shocked that someone was finger it and released it ....of course sex goes on but you expect privacy. 3:37
Something is wrong with this story. Women are not assigned to sub service.
Surface vessels, yes, subs, no.
@peekaboo6622 I've seen you make this comment on several places on this thread. Women began svc on subs back in 2010. Please do adequate research before commenting. TY.
@@monl3807yea you have never served 🤣🤣🤣
Facts
Meanwhile, pornhub just added 2000 new users.
Disturbing
Disgusting!!!
It’s tragic that the semen was filmed.
Yo a journalist naval friend of mine was forced to reenlist after a consensual act happened on a captains desk! This isnt anything new. Although uploading it is. Wow. Just Wow!
Journalism? She/He has to sleep his way to the top to avoid the front line
This happens often so I'm not surprised at all.
Meanwhile, I was forced to shower naked with 95 other dudes in the Marines.
#metoo😂
Some guys just have all the luck
@@rillest75 😂
Women do not get sub details.
@@rillest75how do you not get rock hard
@@peekaboo6622yes they do troll. Why is someone who has never served going on every comment posting this in this thread
This is wrong. But… 👀
Turn the Navy back to the Navy and not a social experiment.
Umm, one has nothing to do with the other.
But if we’re bringing up random things, then I should point out we need to educate our children more and not dumb them down.
Protective custody 👮♂️
Unimaginable, but true 🤨
😮
How do I find these videos? It's for a school project.
Since when are women assigned to submarines?
There are professional 'ride alongs', but not for the entire duration of underway.
@peekaboo6622 I've seen you make this comment on several places on this thread. Women began svc on subs back in 2010. Please do adequate research before commenting. TY.
@@beautifulbull I was married to a submariner at the time.
Who do you think dropped him off and saw all of his shipmates load up and set underway?
@peekaboo6622 I'm actual prior Navy & served on an aircraft carrier. In this instance, it makes no difference. Your comment here is erroneous. And even if it were not erroneous, based on the news piece itself, this occurred across multiple commands on several types of Naval ships, not only subs.
@@beautifulbullthank you for putting this troll in their place. Love it when people who have never served trying to tell people who actually served what goes on
@peekaboo6622 I'm married to a seabee and I drop him off/pick him up from work all the time. I still don't know 90% of who he or other seabees interact with because I'm not *serving with him*
So you never *saw* a female on his sub specifically? Guess that means there's never been a single female on a sub in the history of ever then because you saw your husband load onto his specific sub.
Imho watching pornography is deviant behaviour.
And your point is?
Name ... PRank ... and Cereal Number ...
Ok Ok what Cereal Number ❔
Special K9 / Product 19 ...
C/O vid ... 9 teens
Meanwhile, there are still soldiers who were dishonorably discharged for being openly gay.
However, those who are secretly gay, or bi… run the risk of being discharged as well.
(If the sex was consensual, it shouldn’t matter)
Operation Motorboat
They’re in the service, no expectation of privacy …. Duh
This is why you dont put men and woman on a ship together. Simple as that
I dont care
Normal for democrats
Umm, what the hell are you talking about? Am I getting a hint that you are on the lower end of the “capacity“ scale? I am phrasing it that way to be more polite.
😂😂😂😂😂
NewsNation, I really like your videos, let's be friends!