Why I Don’t Like Mack Rides
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- Mack Rides is a very popular German amusement ride manufacturer. I personally don’t like the company though, and here’s why.
•
•
•
JOIN THE 07 COASTERS DISCORD SERVER
/ discord
You can follow me on Instagram at
/ 07_coasters
Follow my friend adrenaline central on instagram here
/ adrenaline.central
you can subscribe to him on youtube also here
/ @adrenalinecentral5929
VIDEO CREDIT
Helix POV - Liseberg
Journey To Atlantis POV - JohnYChen
DC Rivals Hypercoaster Off Ride - AusCoasters
Sierra Sidewinder Off Ride - Airtime Thrills
Time Traveler Off Ride - Airtime Thrills
Fly POV - Canada’s wonderland
Copperhead Strike Off Ride - ElToroRyan
Blue Fire Megacoaster Off Ride - Zombieface Coasters
Wicker Man POV - Alton Towers
Blue Fire POV - JohnYChen
Avalanche POV - Attraction Spot
Maverick Off ride - Thrillridesuk
Copperhead Strike POV - Carowinds
Full throttle POV - ThemeParkHD
Capitol Bullet Train POV - Jim In
Icon POV - Attraction Source
Fury 325 POV - Carowinds
The Ride To Happiness Off Ride - Mr.Themeparkfans
Flash POV - Coastervideos
Lost Gravity Off Ride - Coaster Hipster
DC Rivals Hypercoaster POV - Parkz
Star Trek: Operation Enterprise POV - Movie Park Germany
BACKGROUND MUSIC
Tropical Resort Act 1 - Sonic Colors
• Tropical Resort (Act 1...
honestly, people need to stop hating on your opinion. everyone has different opinions on things. like personally, I haven't rode a mack coaster, but even if I did I wouldn't hate on your opinion.
like yes, I could disagree with some of these, but still, don't hate on him for an opinion, you seem stupid.
Lmao he's pinned this comment because it's the only positive one here 😂😂😂
@@randomuser238 and what’s the problem with that
@@adrenalinecentral5929 I never said something was wrong with it.
@@randomuser238 you’re laughing at him.. implying you think it’s stupid
right when you started talking about how European coasters looked bad I could feel the brain cells leave my body
Based
@@Luca-ph2yg HI LUCA
Same
my name is luca aswell this is a strange coincidence
“I think most European coasters look really bad”
So did you just forget about Untamed,
Goliath,
Lost gravity,
Kondaa,
Psyké underground,
Fury,
Pulsar,
Joris en de draak,
Troy,
Taron ,
Taiga,
Junker,
Karacho,
Shambhala,
Stunt Fall,
Hals über Kopf,
Superman Madrid,
Icon,
Smiler,
Nemesis,
Helix,
Monster,
Monster,
Wodan,
Silver Star,
Thunderbird,
Kärnan,
Fluch Von Novgorod,
Big Thunder Mountain,
Alpina Blitz,
Storm,
Ispeed,
Nefeskesen,
Star trek,
Black Mamba,
Katun,
Speed Monster,
Stealth,
Saw,
Speed the ride,
Megafobia,
Mystic,
Oziris,
Fenix,
Raptor,
Oblivion Black hole,
baron,
Space Mountain Paris,
Rock'n'Roller Paris,
Colossos, balder,
Jetline,
Olympia Looping,
Lisebergbanan,
Wildfire,
Zadra,
Abyssus,
Hyperion,
Formula,
Abyssus,
Lech coaster,
Expedition GeForce,
Toutatis,
Cu Chulainn,
Furious Baco,
Flug der Dämonen,
Desert race,
Dynamite
El Toro
and more?
the Swarm?
sure, send more
@@Mooory HI MORITZ!
I’m all for this list but aren’t some of these NA
Some of them have shared names with a ride in NA. Raptor is a wing coaster in Italy and it’s also an invert at cedar point. Goliath is an intamin mega at walibi Holland and there’s other Goliaths in the states.
Tell me you never rode a Mack ride without telling me you’ve never rode a Mack ride
Strong Launch
Not sure how a company gaining success at a later time than other companies makes you hate them. That literally makes no sense
exactly
While I haven't ridden a Mack coaster yet, I can say for certain that I definitely disagree some of these points.
1. The company took too long to start building major coasters: I don't understand why that's a reason to hate a coaster manufacturer. I mean they're making major coasters, which is all I think should really matter. They've still been making coasters longer then RMC so . . .
2. They're forceless: While they're launches do look weak, Their coasters look to have great ejector airtime, laterals, positives, hangtime, and whip. I would like if the launches were a bit more forceful, but if the layouts are good I can deal with a weak launch.
3. They're too expensive: It doesn't cost you anything to build these rides, so I don't know why that's a reason for you to consider them bad. At least they're reliable, unlike any Intamin made before 2016, which should actually be more important to you, because that actually affects you.
4.They don't have alot of standout coasters: This isn't a reason to call a manufacturer bad imo. Mack rides makes lots of different types of coasters, and alot of them are oriented towards families, so of corse those won't be stand out attractions. However, just about every major thrill coaster they have made From 2014 onwards looks really good. Considering they've only been making major thrill coasters for 12 years at this point, they have a lot of standout coasters.
(Edit) I rode Copperhead Strike in August, and my second point absolutely stands. It's the second best ride in the park and in my top 10 overall.
For the Price Argument: The Guests will need - allways - to cover the costs. That's how a Buisnress works, and a Theme Park is one. However, an expansive Coaster might still be worth it. Because the Rides are pretty much the only Reason why they have paying Customers in the first Place. Sure, you'll usually pay for Entry, not for the Rides, so a broken down Roller Coaster doesn't accumulate direct losses. But the more "unrelyable" Rides you have in your Parks, the more Downtimes Customers will Experience and the worse that Experience will get. Which doesn't only affect the likeliness of your Customer returning and spending more Money - or not - Customers do Mouth Propaganda. If you had a fantastic Time, you may tell your Friends and Family, who may also visit. If you had a bad Time tough, you will most certainly tell your Friends and Family - who wouldn't wanna visit your Park after bad Reviews.
Also, having something that constantly breaks down is just a huge Pain in the Arse. Ask anyone who ever had the Pleasure of driving an old, inexpansive, fucked up Car. As long as it works, it's absolutely fine and doesn't realy do anything significantly worse then a Car worth 10 Times the Price. However, they are absolutely proned to Failure whenever it is the absolute worst Time to fail. Ask me how I know about that, lol.
I agree with all your points except what you said about Copperhead. No positive Gs on that one for me outside of the first loop. Was kinda boring but the hangtime was cool and it has great air. #5 in the park for me
@@huntzzio It was running really fast when I rode it, and it was more intense than expected. I will say that positives aren't as pronounced as the other forces, but they were still noticable when I rode. The airtime on the three hills and the Stengle dive that goes through the first loop was really good, and the second half had some pretty whippy transitions. The only dull moments were the launches. that's how it ran when I rode it.
@@TB_2006 all your agruments still stand till today. Mack are now building rides like exodus, voltron, Ride to happiness and more and there is no way you could call any of these forceless, atleast by looking at their povs so far/ ride experience. I completly stand by your opinion
Name a coaster Mack made with ejector other than DC rivals and ride to happiness
This is most American thoosie kid video ever
I have ridden over 12 Mack Coasters, and almost every single one was really good. “I think most European coasters look really bad”, I think you´ve never heard of:
-Expedition Geforce
-Kärnan
-Zadra
-Lech Coaster
-Hyperion
-Colossos
-Flug der Dämonen
-iSpeed
-Helix
-Hals über Kopf
-Flucht von Novgorod
-El Toro
-Untamed
-Kondaa
-Wildfire
-Goliath
-Troy
-Fenix
-The Smiler
-Karacho
-Taron
-...
El Toro is an Intamin Prefab
Woodan
ride to happiness toutatis taiga nemesis black mamba fly shambala I could go on for ages
They may be expensive, but one of the main draws for a park to build a mack rides coaster is it's guaranteed ROI (Return on Investment). I have never seen a mack coaster not earn back the money that a park has spent on it which is probably why a park which has been slowly dying like Thorpe Park invested 18million into their latest hyper coaster because they will almost be guaranteed to get a good ROI.
“ it’s forceless, slow and pretty small”
This guy really does not know what quality over quantity means
Lol true true
So being forceful is quantity, got it!
@@tylerkriesel8590?
@@orionscythe ?
Ok I grew up with Mack coasters at Europapark so I don't agree at all.
1. Not every Launch needs to be forceful. Yes sure Mack builds weak launches but remember not everyone likes forceful Launches
2. "Mack Rides is a slow Company"
so what? is it that bad that Mack took so long to make a BIG COASTER? It sounds like it's a bad thing that it took them so long.
3. Mack coasters may not be intense but remember: Some people don't like intense coasters. Mack literally serves the market for high thrilling but not overly intense rollercoasters.
4. Mack Rides has some of the highest quality rollercoasters, the quality of the ride makes the price fair.
Mack rides coasters are some of the most intense nowadays especially in terms of airtime. Helix, DC Rivals and reportedly Ride to Happiness all pull -1.5g or higher which is completely ridiculous, and stronger anything Intamin is doing nowadays.
@@lucacoasters8765rth pulls -1.9 if I remember correctly
I know im a bit late now but with their Stryker model (Ive ridden Voltron over 15 times now) they really "completed" their range of Coasters. Votron or strykers being the forcefull and intense coasters hes seeking, Hypercoasters like hyperia, spinning and extreme spinning coasters, launched coasters that are thrilling but still for families etc. I think Mack really is one of the best manufacturers now
I totally agree with your 3rd point !! I’m not the biggest fan of positive g’s and I prefer hang time, airtime and whip. Which is why I love icon so much.
Also, to add to your 2/4th point. Remember Vekoma guys. Look how long it took to get to making good high quality rides (no hate to Vekoma I love what they’re doing) and at least Macks older coasters were decent.
Mack rides have the best seats. I personaly love the company because off lost gravity in walibi Holland
"most European coasters look really bad"
-Expedition Geforce
-Kärnan
-Zadra
-Lech Coaster
-Hyperion
-Colossos
-Flug der Dämonen
-iSpeed
-Helix
-Hals über Kopf
-Flucht von Novgorod
-El Toro
-Untamed
-Kondaa
-Wildfire
-Goliath
-Troy
-Fenix
-The Smiler
Where are Helix and Wildfire tho?
@@TwanTastic Helix is at Liseberg in Sweden
@@TwanTastic Wildfire I think is either in Sweden, Finland, or germany
@@mocha_. it's the rmc in Sweden...
@@TwanTastic Yes, thanks
Completely disagree I'm afraid. Just because it took them until 2009 to build modern day thrill-coasters, does not mean their other rides are bad, they were incredibly successful as seen by the number of rides/models they've produced world-wide, as u mention towards the end.
Though it comes close, Mack is perhaps my favourite manufacturer, mainly for the unparalled quality of their modern rides. The seats, for example, are exceptional! :)
So I'm not an engineer, but I think the slow launches help with the reliability.
Ok i gave u dislike for that one coment abt European coasters
Yeah it was so random and weird
@@villek3722 exactly
@@puwcyk and Mack rides if fire
Apparently, the ride to happiness kicks a ton of ass when it comes to it’s launch, so they can make intense launches, parks just don’t want them to.
and it spins whilst launching. Ride to happiness just shits all over this guys opinion
Copperhead Strike is one of the Best Coasters in the Cedar Fair chain. The JoJo Roll in the beginning before the launch tunnel is special. Every launch doesn't need to be like Kingda Ka to make a coaster a thriller and Copperhead Strike most definitely dances with zombies, wears a red V jacket and glitter socks.
Find another coaster to demonstrate Mack's flaws because Copperhead rocks.
150 years ago there were 0 roller coasters on earth. You'd blame that on Mach rides too, am I correct?
Okay.... Every launch doesn’t need to be forceful. I think you can see Mack’s launches like a drop on a B&M. It is not that forceful but gets the ride started. So in Mack’s launches as a way to get up to speed and not an element. Then I don’t think the rest of the layout is force less
That they don’t have many elite coaster is because they have only been making thrill coaster since 2008. You said that they have 8 elite coaster and I thinks that is pretty many. Especially when they’re elite coaster are like 4-5 different models. So they know how to design good models and you hate B&M more because how many new models have they made since 2008. I can give the answers, like 1-2.
Then the price of a ride shouldn’t make you start to hate a manufacturer. If it’s like that I only like kiddie coaster. Because they are cheap.
You have also 1-3 Mack coaster and you say that you don’t like them. If think your opinion is going to change if you ride helix. But your not going to Europe because you think they are not that many good roller coaster. Your opinion is going to change if you go to Europe.
Mack literally build more elite coasters from 2013 till now then Intamin HAHAHAHA
As someone who’s ridden copperhead strike. I think Mack launch coasters are pretty much carried by their elements. But the only way they are executed the way they are is through force less launches. If that makes any sense
Which continent do most of the good coaster manufacturers come from?
Europe
0:39 great, now do a video ranting about 1362 coasters you've never ridden lol
I said they looked bad not that they are bad.
I mean why do they "look" bad? Not every coaster needs to be a hyper to be good, and I would argue a lot of European coasters look just as good as their American counterparts, if not better
I wasn't expecting anything from copperhead strike from all I herd about macks being forceless. I was shocked to find out its was crazy forceful and felt rmc like and kicked mavericks ass and was far in away better than intimidator and afterburn maybe I caught on a good day but I rode it countless times last week and every ride blew me away.
I know I’m late but just in case you didn’t know the reason why copperhead costed more than fury was because Mack had to ship the track all the way from Germany. Because of the distance, it makes the shipment expensive. B&M has a plant in the U.S. so that helps cut the price for the track shipment down I guess. Plus copperhead has a lot more theming than fury. This is what I heard for why copperhead is the more expensive ride.
You shoukd have done more research before posting this...Mack has just recently started to manufacter thrill coasters so obviously they dont have too many standout ones.
yes but according to him they are "too slow" and that is why Mack Rides is bad
@@randomuser238 they were still in the industry about 100 years before they made their first big coaster
He literally said that in the video??
@@adrenalinecentral5929 that doesnt make any sense then. If he knows why Mack doesnt have many world class coasters then why does he hate them for it?
@@villek3722 because they have some good roller coasters and all the others are kind of bad. Why are you so pressed over this
Roland Mack doesn't like this
I have thought about buying a mack roller coaster but I finally opted for a new sofa. Anayway my garden would have been a little bit too small for the coaster and the sofa turned out to be very reliable too.
Bro woke up and chose violence
I mean honestly copperhead ranks just behind orion for me and is an excellent ride. I love the ejector plus the comfortable restraints. The inversions are also nice and I’m a sucker for hangtime so it just paired perfectly. I think a lot of your points are kinda nit-picky if I’m being honest. Like how they just started building bigger coasters and how that’s a problem and the whole price tag thing. Like of course we wish they made bigger coasters earlier and maybe a bit cheaper but maybe consider separating what’s out of your own control on facts forming your opinion, from your raw opinion of how a ride truly is. Just out of curiosity what Mack rides coasters have you ridden?
Copperhead is right behind fury for me at carowinds
he's probably ridden a wild mouse and maybe a mine train
"most european coasters look pretty bad"
most coaster manufacturers are based in europe, the only big ones in the us being:
Arrow
Chance Rides
CCI
GCI
Gravity Group
PTC
Premier
RMC
RCCA
Skyline
E&F Miller
S&S
Wisdom Rides
European based manufacturers:
abc rides
art engineering
B&M
Gerstlauer
Giovanola
Intamin
(imaScore)
Interpark
KumbaK
Mack
Maurer
Pinfari
Preston & Berbieri
RCS (they install most coasters)
Reverchon
RES
SBF
Schwarzkopf
Sunkid
Technical Park
Vekoma
Zamperla
Zierer
Wigand
4:03 he sounds like he’s trying to think of a comeback in an argument he’s loosing
I was literally reading a script
@@07coasters80 It's called a compact coaster like Balder at Liseberg. An Intamin prefab
@@sigmundjavenesflaa3452 what does that have to do with Mack rides
@@07coasters80 You said Copperhead Strike was small scale. It is a compact rollercoaster.
@@sigmundjavenesflaa3452 yeah it’s compact, but it’s small scale in comparison to the other coasters at carowinds and also in comparison to larger mack coasters like the hyper coasters and helix
Mack are slowly getting better and more extreme. According to some Insiders i spoke to, the younger generation inside the company is slowly but surely getting a louder voice in the design process. Just look at the massive new launch coaster in China or the new Hyper at Thorpe Park (which many speculate to be a Mack).
Ride to happiness aswell is apparently amazing
European Coasters Are Just As Good As U.S Coasters! 😤
In europe coasters have a theme in US not lol. But if they say European coasters are less good that's not true at all. We have Taron, F.L.Y, the ride to happiness, untamed. They're maybe not as high as in usa but that doesn't mean they're less good
@@mtdemon9946 Yea
Better imo. Neither ridden either however us coasters have no theming apart from like Velocicoaster and Hagrids. For me theming is one of if not the most important part of a coaster but that’s my opinion.
@@deejasart7766 indeed the theming of taron for example is amazing
@@deejasart7766 I honestly don't think too highly of European coasters. It is kind of unfair for me to say that since I haven't been to Europe, but coasters in the USA set the standards and constantly one up each other. For example, in the UK, it is a consistent consensus that Nemesis is considered their best coaster. While i have no issue with that, I can tell you Montu, Alpengiest, and Raptor are all better. Theming does add a nice atmosphere for any ride, but it definitely doesn't make or break a coaster. I feel sometimes extra theming is given to certain rides to make up for what would be a lack luster coaster. I would rather have the money go towards ride layout than theming. Look at Taron. One of the best themed coasters, but Maverick, Velocicoaster, and now even Pantheon crap all over Taron. The Theming makes it seem like it is a better ride than what it is. I like theming, but just a nice setting, decent queue line and station is all you need. Mako at Sea World Orlando is perfect example. Awesome queue line and station and the coaster is along the lake. Perfect!
Hate is a strong word.
I mean, idk what you’re talking about when you say that Cooperhead Strike is forceless. I will agree completely that the launch is forceless, but to say the rest of the ride is forceless is completely missing it. It pulls more negatives (less sustained however) than Fury, and it pulled higher positives (barely) than Fury as well. So to call it forceless is really just incorrect lol.
If sarcasm is what you're attempting to do here: you failed; just look at the like dislike ratio.
Take icon. It has a launch of around 1.05g and Rita at Alton towers has a 1.1g launch. Mack coasters don’t have much jerk. Also when you talked about their worst x treme spinning coaster as more famous, you insulted European enthusiasts
If it's cheap to invest in a fast launch: build it yourself. I'm sure all the parks are scared of your coaster launch "genius"
Let me know WHEN you manufacture your 1st roller coaster for Cedar Point.
launching this slow into a loop looks kinda fun tho. it's different. and different makes rides stand out...
this is a good video with some thought into it and I respect your stance on Mack but in My opinion it is one of the better manufacturers because of its reliability and comfortable yet forceful layouts like BlueFire which I rode 3 times. I think Mack also has recently started to make their rides cheaper and most buyers want what Mack can make. I respect them the most for how they are trying to get in different markets like wild mouse and how they can create new ones with the extreme spinner. All in all that is my opinion and I respect yours and good on you for talkin about your opinion.
So if RMC existed 200 Years before they made a big coaster they would be a bad manufacturer?
Helix launches are not launches, they are boosters for remaining the spped of the train
So i am a Mack fan and that with the Mack Launches is accurate. But Mack Rides is improving alot. There is an new Coaster Model coming to Europapark thats like a Big Dipper but with 4 Launches if we count the spike launch too. 8 Inversions and hella crazy elements. Also Ride to Happiness has an great launch too. And with one thing i have to disagree with you. Coasters here in Europe are really good. Sure most coasters are not as thrilling as in the USA but we have great coasters with great theming. It is awesome to hear your opinion but i think the 2 things i agree with you is the price and the launches. But the other things i have to disagree.
yea voltron looks peak
oh boi, how do i get started on this comment, i want to be respectful of a friends comment section so here we go... I not only disagree, but i find copperhead to be elite, yes elite, i know this is shocking news for an 07 coasters fan but guess what, 2 things, ejector and hangtime. The launches are forceless of course, they are supposed to gain speed not be main elements like other manufacturers, mack is the most underrated manufacturer ive seen, well other than those damn wild mice and journey to Atlantis in san antonio, yeah they are trash, but the Mack thrill coasters are almost all on my bucket list. So i must say that im proud of myself for not losing it, those damn anger management classes at cedar point might be helping.... it sure as hell is not the ones at six flags lmao
Anger management at cedar point?
@@07coasters80 the joke was better in my head
@@coasterland325 oh I get it lol. Bc riding roller coasters is like anger management
@@07coasters80 yes
Copperhead Strike is not "elite". It's fun, but underwhelming.
First why do you care about price? Second they are an independent family owned company so of course it's going to be expensive. Third they have alot more standout coasters than what you said
ICON at Blackpool Pleasure Beach is a fantastic ride. I've never ridden a Mack coaster and thought it was bad. Eurosat Can Can Coaster might be the best indoor coaster in the world it's so so good.
Someone's got 13 year old thoosie brainrot
*says he doesn’t like European coasters*
*me realising Taron is European*
“You what now?”
You ever thought about why Copperhead was so expensive. Maybe is because the track had to be fabricated in Germany before being shipped to the US. Also what Mack coasters have you ridden perchance?
Also Mack is family owned so it costs more
A lot of companies have to fabricate track in europe and ship it to America like intamin, and most of their coasters aren’t as expensive as mack.
@@07coasters80 bruh you didn't answer the guys second question
@@07coasters80 intamin's are known for how expensive they are though + Mack rides are rll reliable which is not something you can say abt Intamin
@@randomuser238 Maybe because he didn't even ride one. It's the same thing with "European Coasters are bad". I would guess, he never rode one.
This video got outdated very fast
The ride to happiness,
Beyond the clouds, Hyperia,
Starfall racers
Voltron
I thought that copperhead was unnecessary expensive because of theming rather than coaster itself. Because theming is always jacking up the price absurdly high.
Look closer than Verbolten, it's not Intamin, it's not even kind of thrill ride you expect (other than drop track part), yet BGW spend more than 25m for this.
Because bgw built a very advanced system inside that massive building of expensive things
What are your thoughts in hyperia now that’s open? I mean it’s short, but definitely not forceless
Do you think 100km/h is slow?
And the point of the Mack launches isn't force, it is to speed the train up.
Some Mack coasters is ranked as some of the best in the world, like Helix.
It fell off when the intern left
why your points are invalid :
1. taking long to make a thrill coaster is not a problem, i am not sure why you see it as one (also no one says this about rmc)
2.while you could say their launches are forceless, the coasters being forceless is just not true, literally look at the coasters you mention as "elite"
3. while you could say the price of the coaster is a disadvantage, but the disadvantage is for the park so why would you care and maybe that extra price pays off for better reliability than say an RMC
4.your point makes no sense here. the company started building thrill coasters in 2009 and you are upset they only have 8 elite coasters?? you literally contradict yourself and the reason they have made over 150 coasters and only 8 are elite is because most of them are family coasters
TLDR : this video made me face palm, a lot
Angry Tesla Coil Noises ⚡️⚡️⚡️
0:44 Ride to Happiness, Toutatis, Taron, F.L.Y, Nemesis, The Smiler, De Shwur Des Karnan, Shambhala, Red Force, Wildfire, Untamed, Expedition GeForce, Zadra, Batman City Gotham Escape, Hyperion, Helix, Icon and so many more, joined the chat
And can't forget the addition of Hyperia and Voltron soon 🎉
they're launches get too much hate i've been on icon and the acceleration is actually pretty good and i've been on 2 hydraulic launch coasters being rita and stealth and stealth is the 3rd fastest acceleration for a launch also the more instense the launch the more energy used and i think that the higher acceleration will lead to more breakdowns due to the more sensors needed which can fault or cause and error, also the price is due to the track being manufactured in germany so it needs to be shipped to everywhere compared to B&M having it manufactured in the U.S also the layouts are really good plus the launch coasters are actually supposed to be less thrilling than a blitz so that it can be more encompassing to their audience also the park decides the layout and the speed and the acceleration so i disagree with your point but your opinion is your opinion
Mack Rides is amazing, and what’s wrong with European coasters?
U compare a launch coaster with a hyper coaster. And i see no reasons how u can hate a coaster like the ride to happiness
Respect your opinion, but it is really coaster oriented (ofcourse haha). Mack made circus trailers for the first few hundred years they exist. They make a lot of flat rides and dark ride vehicles which are reliable and great, it is a really German company not that innovative but really decent. However looking at new ride systems of Mack are looking good.
Ha now we’ve got ride to happiness hyperia and Voltron what do you think about them now
I’ve never ridden a B&M... so am eligible to make a video saying all B&M coasters are bad?
If you think most of their coasters don’t look good then yes.
@@07coasters80 Then you're wrong.
@@DM-jb8fs ^^
"most european coasters Look really Bad"
uhhhhhhhhhhhhh
alright
Ride to happiness that’s all bye
Mack multi launches dont need a good launch, they're focused on inversions or airtime like helix. I've ridden copperhead and the launch is weak but I love the ride for what comes after it. The launches are just the thing to get the ride up to speed. And while mack isn't the best manufacturer ever, I still think they're good.
Check out the Mack coaster going in Suzhou china. That looks unfreakingbelievable
no
I'm not a big Mack fan myself, but at the end of the day that's just personal taste. Mack Rides have established themselves as the go-to manufacturer for family thrill coasters and obviously there's a market for that. You may not like their rides, but that doesn't mean they're a bad company. Plus the intensity of launches IS affecting costs. More powerful launches require different electrical components or even energy storing devices. Not just that but a park might want to have a weak launch to attract a wider demographic. How on earth is Mack Rides a bad company for delivering exactly what a park wants to have?
I respect your opinion but it seems you just dont understand Mack coasters, they're not supposed to be the most intense coaster around, they're supposed to be smooth and fun experiences for the family (Not the entire family obviously). And no way you said European coasters look bad lmao
completely disagree, icon is one of the best coasters in the uk!!!
Totally agree.
Right this is late, but there's alot of contradictory points here, first who cares if they took over a hundred years to make a good ride, like why does that matter. Secondly also connecting to that, out of ther small 160 current coasters around 60 are 'thrilling' and there a 8 standouts in you opinion so 13% of there coasters are a 'standout'. And force wise DC Rivals pulls -2g, Ride to Happiness pull 4.5g. The launches are slow, but the design often relies on that, like copperhead strike with the hangtime filed loop.
the purpose of a launch isn’t to make it forceful.
It depends. I mean taron would suck without the forcefull launch
@@aswisshuman637 yea but family coasters w/ a launch aren’t going to be forceful.
Why are European coasters bad if you don’t mind explaining?
Well it’s not that any of them are bad. I just don’t think most European coasters look to be that outstanding. That’s not to say that coasters like zadra, untamed, GeForce, and wildfire all look amazing.
@@07coasters80 I could say the same shit about US coasters. I have not been there but I guess I can say it anyways.
Most of the really good coasters in Europe are Standout coasters for the park they're in.
Think Expedition Geforce, that park would be nothing without it. Same with Lech Coaster, literally nobody would know that the park existed without this coaster.
Think Taron, Taron made US enthusiasts aware of Phantasialand.
Think Energylandia, Abyssus, Zadra, Hyperion made this park explode in popularity.
@@AnotherSwissCZcamsUser as least in Europe the rides look nice rather than just being stuck on tarmac (Six Flags) I mean Europa Park is amazing.
I have to say they are very slow in evolving but everything they put out is excellent. I compared blue fire and taron round the time they first opend and did them again last year. And the intamin like all intamins I rode is getting rough and shakey and mack remains smooth as butter. B&M is better at the large scale coasters but they are way behind on launched coasters. So every company has something going for them.
I have Liseberg very clos to my home. The launches are not very good at all. What i have heard Mack Rides want the coaster to be more stable with few down time as possible. I have ride Helix many times but i like it alot. The seats are good with no over the sholders restrains. But i like it alot.
Before the video I was like no way Mack is bad but then I realised all the points you brought up make a lot of sense tbh copper head strike being more then fury 325 is ridiculous shame on you Mack product
What’s your opinion on Thunder Run at Canada’s Wonderland? It’s a MACK rides Powered coaster
Bro I cant belive you left out Cobra's Curse, thats one of MACK's BEST coasters, they made an elevated lift hill with spinning feature of its kind, the ride opened in 2016 few years after Falcon's Fury opened
This MACK ride is at Busch Gardens Tampa FL
Yeah I’m in the uk coaster enthusiast community and WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE ICON it is slow, it is boring, it is little from intense, it feels like a family coaster, the list could go on.
mack also made a more forceful layout, but the park wanted it to be more family friendly
Just wait, the only reason Mack has so few rides in the US is because they still produce in Germany and are known for good and safe quality, but because of that and included shipping they are very expensive for the US market. They have been really adventureous in recent years though, ride of happiness and Voltron are 2 examples and we can see a rise in request by the US market for their rides, its probably not gonna be long before they become a top contender in the US market as well. And in all fairness, your comment about the eurpean coasters "looking" bad is most dumbest shit i have heard, sorry for my words, but in terms of looks what MACK is creating has WAY better design and themeing than anything i have seen in a american park. Except for Disney Land and some other exceptions the themeing is the last they consider i have seen so many Five flags for example and other parks that are just the bare rides and nothing around it so bland.
Coaster Enthusiasts when a Mack has a weak launch
👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁
Coaster Enthusiasts when that same ride has some of the strongest airtime and hangtime with tons of intensity
(-|-) I sleep
They really don’t have a tonne of intensity, no one ever raves about a Mack rides coaster having many extreme forces at all and even if they did intamin would do something similar but with far more bite to it
@@wfcmarl6066 Mack is so underrated y’all only hate on it because Coaster Studios hates it
@@birdwholikesmovies bruh didn’t even know CS hated Mack
Ok maybe im a year late and maybe Mack Rides is my favourite manufacturer but i will stay objective.
First, the launches, ok blue fire, copperhead strike, star trek are a bit weak but mack changed since, the ride to happiness launch looks way better and the new coaster in china that they build looks insane and intense.
Second, the cost you said that mack is too expensive but you are taking exemples on launch coasters, adding a launch on a track is up the price by 30%(or a percentage like that)
Also, take the exemple of piraten, a intamin megalite, my homepark Nigloland wanted basically the same but they asked Mack to reproduce it cause its less expensive and they wanted more confort on it and i quote "not those camping chairs"(translated from french)
You were talking about Mack not having standouts rides and i will accord you this one.
But look at those seats🤩 so comfortable.
I respect ur opinion, no hate btw
My best rollercoaster is a mack rides rollercoaster with hyperia
You didn’t show a shuttle lounch to say mack is bad at lounches
Also this is a design choice. It's not like they are to dumb to put more energy on those lsm blades. This ride goes for hangtime. To be fair, this video is three years old, i think with ride to happiness, voltron, hyperia, DC Rivals, lost gravity, icon, helix they build some great coasters.
@@patrickmuhlbeyer9262 true
I respect your opinion, but using a point that you don’t like a manufacturer because it took them a while to build a major coaster is a bit harsh. Also their standouts are amazing rides. Ride to happiness and dc rivals are 2 of the best coasters on the planet. When project exodus opens at Thorpe park that will be great as well. Also European coasters don’t suck… like at all: ride to happiness,
Kondaa, smiler, wildfire, Zadra, untamed, taron , taiga, toutatis nemesis, expedition gforce, and when it opens exodus.
you literally mentioned 8 amazing rollercoasters and proceeded to call them not too amazing, what…
No but honestly. They started building thrill coasters just over 10 years ago and with coasters like DC Rivals and RTH they built at least 2 coasters that many people have already declared their favorite one. From my own experiences I can say that for example Helix is easily a better ride that Taron.
Just wait til you ride DC Rivals. The forces on that ride are insane!!
It wouldn’t be realistic if it gone to fast bro
I don’t necessarily agree with everything but the cost and launch part is understandable
I think I’ve heard people say shipping costs is what makes them so expensive but still there’s a point where the cost imo isn’t justified
And those Mack launched really aren’t too good imo
I like a little force in my launches but that’s up to preference honestly
I don’t hate Mack rides but they definitely do something’s that are pretty annoying
I think Voltron and Ride to hapinnes will get so much
Bro is not really intelligent
Australias Best coaster DC Rival by Mack Rides but a "they dont have good rides" sentence. Lmao
I could name more than one ride that is actually Gold. And btw: many ppl call Ride to Happyness the BEST coaster in the world, also by mack rides.
At the end of the day, it breaks down to personal preferences. Mack established themselves as one of the big players. As you said: they are not that long in the thrill coaster section. So give them time.
Idm if ppl with different opinions, but all reasons you named are not reasonable facts.
The only agreement i can find is their weaker launches. But thats intentional. Give them a couple more years to make more powerful launches.
Intamin also didnt appear made the greatest launches from the start on. So what is your point?
Sorry but the arguments for not liking MACK are.... mehh. It's not like you're paying for the coasters? And I don't really see how them taking a long time to build a major ride matters?
As for the standout rides thing, yeah they don't have too many. Because not many parks are looking for a stand-out ride from MACK. Most of the coasters they build are tame. They've not built nearly as many thrill coasters as other manufacturers like Intamin or B&M, yet they still have what is widely agreed upon to be the best rollercoaster in the world. Or at least the 2nd best. The Extreme Spinner is a unique concept, because nobody had made thrill coasters that spun before AFAIK. They were being creative, which I think they should get more credit for. Intamin and RMC get praised for being creative all the time.
As for Mack's being forceless, yes. The launches usually suck ass (except for RtH that's a decent launch) but the rest of the rollercoaster usually has good forces. MACK rollercoasters tend to have a big variety of forces with a focus on hangtime. I think you could critique them for that since hangtime isn't as thrilling if a force as some others.
Typical noob review ...whatever
Mack have the most comfortable seats and their restraint are perfection.
Why does it matter that it took so long to build any big coasters, their current employees aren’t responsible for the decisions of people there before them
The part when you bring up how copperhead is small scale, sure the size is but think of this.
2 launches. Both kinda forceful, noting insane but still. It’s a launch and I’ll take it. 5 inversions. Ejector Airtime, theming
That covered the bases they didn’t have, a launch, a solid multi looper that wasn’t a jank arrow (no offense Carolina cyclone) and ejector airtime and theming. Also saying they’re bad and didn’t make a good coaster for over a hundred years is just flat out wrong, they weren’t offering anything to compete for that spot, unless you count euromir. So yeah this video is uh, kinda bullshit :)