Power, Corruption, & Lies-The 1978 World Cup | AFC Finners | Football History Documentary
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 08. 2021
- The 1978 World Cup would be hosted in Argentina, a country in turmoil, having recently been overtaken by a military dictatorship. The tournament was full of controversy, with allegations of match-fixing and bribery rife.
The tournament still carries negative connotations to this day, but sadly, the world of football does not appear to have learned its lesson.
Music-
Rising Tide by Kevin MacLeod
Link: incompetech.filmmusic.io/song...
License: filmmusic.io/standard-license
Lost Time by Kevin MacLeod
Link: incompetech.filmmusic.io/song...
License: filmmusic.io/standard-license
Sources-
www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...
www.esquire.com/uk/culture/a2...
www.thefootballhistoryboys.co...
www.theguardian.com/football/...
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/jonathans...
www.firstpost.com/sports/worl... - Sport
There is nothing I love more than football history! This was a great video topic and a great video. Please do more of these!
Thanks buddy, subscribe to see plenty more coming up!
Just a minor correction, Videla’s coup took place in 1976, not 1977. Therefore it was two years before the World Cup.
Thanks for letting me know, sometimes things slip through the cracks, hope you still enjoyed video
@@afcfinners I did. I would also like to add that most Peruvian players of the 1978 National Team have even stated that Henry Kissinger came into their locker room along with Videla shortly before the infamous 6-0 match against Argentina. The ones that denied ever seen Kissinger are the ones FIFA invite for their official videos 😂
I would like you to upload information about the World Cups in Italy in 1934, France in 1938 and England in 1966 (ghost goal)
You’re more than welcome to check out my video on 1934 World Cup here-
czcams.com/video/4BTG8b9txr4/video.htmlsi=8RINZNndTohRDYbX
Great informative content, 1978 was before my time and great insight into the corruption and goings on
Thank you, sadly looks like history will repeat itself next year...
Sweltering heat in Argentina in July? It's winter season during that time in Argentina. Hence the long sleeve jerseys.
Exactly, there was ice on the grass.
How did Brazil play in the "sweltering heat" if the world cup was played in the winter???.....and it is very cold in Argentina in the month of June!
That's what i was thinking ! I googled both cilës mendoza .
Mendoza is warmer than rasorio
Loving these mate 👏🏻 Deffo worth the sub and hope you get the recognition you deserve soon
Aww thank you so much! Plenty more videos along the way!
Sweltering heat? Winter in Argentina. Note the long sleeves worn by players in the pictures.
Scorer of the last goal was Daniel Bertoni. A couple of names are wrong here.
By the way, 1978 winter was one of the coldest winters ever recorded in Argentina.
This is the same as what China does at the current Olympics in China.
😂 your Korean, there was no evidence of any corruption by China but there is definitely corruption and fixing common among Koreans, especially North Korea including the 2002 World Cup by South korea.
Every Argentina win is super controversial for some reason.
1978 due to corruption 1986 hand of god (which was a hand ball thus should have been disallowed) 2022 due to the amount of penalties given to argentina in all but two of the games they played.
@@excess824beauty of football is near debox area.. u cannot foul in most critical area .. when fouled.. definitely penalty awarded.. lol no need to cry 😂😂
if i give u one punch on hand:: less reaction
same punch on stomach:: bit more reaction
same punch on down 👇 di*k:: you will cry like mad man because of critical area punch ..
same way football work.. don't joke on critical debox otherwise ur finished 😂😂🎉
Yet you tell them these factual things and apparently we’re “crying” lmao pathetic.
They almost won in 90, the same Cup they had Brazilian players drugged on the pitch.
@@DizzyMakavelli that’s crazy
This World Cup was held in winter, there was ice on the grass in the morning.
I like mini documentary style videos. I didn’t know much about the 1978 World Cup or any controversies but I don’t want ronaldo fanboys looking at this video and saying “Argentina are corrupt and the 2022 World Cup was rigged for Argentina”
You said at 4.21 Brazil had to play in the afternoon in the sweltering heat while Argentina play in the cooler evening, It was the middle of winter gets cold in winter time in Argentina look at the final the crowd wore coats it was in the southern hemasphere.
Continuing the previous comment, as it got too long.
6) Could and should have there been a boycott? For a boycott to have a chance to be effective, the best time would have been before the qualifiers even started. First we should look at exactly that happened, the first qualifying games were played in the African qualifying zone in early March 1976, shortly before the coup in Argentina, which took place on March 24th 1976. The first UEFA qualifiers were played in May. Given the fact that most countries in the world at the time were ruled by military dictatorships and that the Warsaw Pact and COMECON countries recognized the military regime in Argentina, any boycott could only come from the Western European countries, and such a campaign did take place in 1978, shortly before the WC, when it was too late, not during '76 and '77, when the qualifiers took place.
7) Could a boycott have stopped the WC from taking place? In a time period close to the '78 WC, that is the second half of the '70s and the '80s, 4 consecutive Summer Olympic Games were boycotted to a larger or smaller degree, Montreal in '76, Moscow in '80, Los Angeles in '84 and Seoul in '88, still all took place. A boycott by western European countries would not have stopped the '78 WC, as other teams would have simply taken their place, but it would have definitely had a symbolic impact.
8) Where else could the '78 WC have taken place, had Argentina decided not to host it like Colombia did in '82 or had FIFA taken the tournament from Argentina? Given that '78 was South America's turn to host the WC anyway, FIFA would have to give priority to South American bids. Colombia can be ruled out as at the time it was taken for granted that the country would host the '86 WC, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia can be ruled out for economic reasons, Venezuela which might have the economic ability had very little football tradition, Uruguay and Paraguay had neither the needed infrastructure nor the ability to build it, which leaves only 2 options, Chile and Brazil, the 2 countries that had up to that point hosted WCs in South America in the post WW2 period, with Brazil the most likely option. Both were ruled at the time by military juntas, Chile since '73 and Brazil since '64. While it is true that things in Brazil were not as brutal in '78 as they were in Argentina, the chief reason for that was that the Brazilian junta had been in power for much longer, and anybody familiar with the history of successful military coups and dictatorships around the world knows that the first years after a coup are also the ones characterized by the worst oppression. To take the WC from Argentina because of the military junta and give it to another country also ruled by a military junta would have of course been absurd.
In a nutshell, the '78 WC doesn't need to be more or less controversial that other WCs, all WCs are controversial for a variety of reasons, something inevitable as a WC has so many aspects. The non-sport side of the '78 WC made things which have practically happened in each WC seem more suspect and sinister than what otherwise would have been the case, a perfect example in the WC that followed, that of Spain in '82, a far more questionable tournament from a purely sport perspective than '78, what differed was the conditions in the host country, with Spain having just come out of the Franco dictatorship period. As for a boycott, had Western Europe decided to do that, it would certainly been a correct, honorable and praiseworthy decision, but it is also difficult to blame them for not boycotting, particularly if we take into consideration that there has been no concerted boycott campaign for the Qatar WC, which is a far worse case than Argentina, as a) it was totally predictable in 2010 at what state Qatar would be in 2022 and under what sort of regime, contrary to Argentina in '66, b) the country has practically zero football tradition, contrary to Argentina, c) there is no room for football growth either and d) it is a country climatically totally unsuitable as a WC host, apart from the fact that it was obvious from the start that there was bribery involved. A boycott should have taken place the first day after Qatar was chosen as host country for the '22 WC. Concluding, the things said about the '78 WC are mostly said by people who evidently have never seen any footage from the tournament, like Jon Spurling's claim about Kissinger being a host speaker in the opening ceremony, and are clearly clueless not just about football but anything else in general. Practically all footage from '78 is available online, people should better watch it first rather than uncritically reproducing all sort of nonsense they have read about it.
1.. Peru players said no one from FIFA and ARGENTINA LEADERS ENTER THE LOCKER ROKM TO BRIBE THEM TO LOSE THE GAME......yet 20 years there was evidance in photographs that they did enter the Peru locker room...............those players lied and most are consider sell outs and they haven't denied it after the pictures were realeased
@@ballwreck1139 There are indeed photos that show Videla visiting the Peruvian locker room before the game, and Peruvian players have mentioned that, stating that it was an intimidating event, but that's not in itself an evidence of fixing, what I wrote is that we can't take as a proven fact that the game was fixed, as many people do, it is a possibility, but the most likely is that firm evidence will never surface, even if it exists
@@maximilianmaximilian1321 dude.......wtf.....the investigations all lead to the same shit.....money in the pockets of players, with the secretary of fucking videla saying "he told the players this was the day they could save thousands of lives by preventing a war if they lost the game" what other fucking evidence do you need, just accept that you're probably not going to change your mind at all because you're Argentinian or are in bed with the thought of not being fixed, but the evidence is clear.........the new York times states
"If the world cup wasn't as fixed, by shadow hands, then we wouldn't be arguing about why the sport is in bad hands"
Period. Believe what you want to, but Cruyft saying
"My life was at risk if I went to Argentina" is also fucking evidence.....he was told not to go..... because he would be killed, why, why, why????? Would cruft miss a world cup???? The guy cried about being told how he would die along with all his friends and the Netherlands squad talks about how they weren't allowed to do certain things......why would they lie about that
@@ballwreck1139 Which investigations and by whom? There have only been claims and rumors, nothing else. As for Cruyff, what he said was that he didn't feel for going to the world cup due to a kidnapping attempt on him and his family in Barcelona, resulting in them living in fear, and under such conditions he couldn't play at a world cup. No I am not Argentinian neither do I have any connection to Argentina, nor do I have some need to believe anything about the '78 WC, but as a historian by training I try to distinguish between things which have or might have a basis on reality and what is clearly crap, and much of what has been said about the '78 WC has been evidently said by people who haven't even seen footage of the tournament. As for the Argentina-Peru game i think that there is definitely a possibility that the game was fixed, but that should not be taken for granted, particularly while not examining other possibilities
I would say that their 1986 WC is the least rigged, that's still pretty questionable considering the hand of god help sending them to the final.
6:12 it sounds awkward with captions on
In 1986, Argentina won the quarter final against England, by Maradona scoring a gol with his hands. In 1990 Argentina won the round of 16 against Brazil, but they drugged some brazilian players, even maradona confessed that on an argentinian national channel. U don't need to believe me, just look yourself at Google n CZcams. Also watch the game in 1978, Argentina x Peru. I love argentinian people, Brazil, Argentina n Uruguay r brothers, we even share public squares in both countries.
In 1966, against England, one of Argentinas most important players got sent off because he asked for a translator. In 1990, in the final against Germany, a player got send off and Germans were awarded with a penalty for tackles that hit the ball. In 2014, on another final against Germany, Neuer ignored Higuaín who was looking after the ball and jumped into him, and people dismissed it saying Higuain fouled Neuer. In 2022 final, France got awarded with two penalties and an extra sub, crazy!
they deserve that loss in 1990 for cheating@@bautistachasseing7164
True...
They’re well known cheaters and the population embrace this like something positive.
They’re proud of the hand of god thing.
@@bautistachasseing7164 Argentina wouldn't have made it to the final if they didn't drug the Brazilians so that 1990 one is debunked already. In 2014, ball was touched first so no foul is committed. I believe you believe it was a penalty because the same situation happened in the Croatia vs Argentina game in 2022 which was marked as a penalty yet such decision is criticized to this day. In 2022, Paredes gave a bad tackle to a Netherlands player and then shot the ball at the bench. Those were two yellow card offenses that deserved for him to get a red. Not to mention the unsportsmanlike behavior from Messi should have been enough to remove him as well yet no punishment was given (i.e. taunting celebrations, disrespect against players, and overall terrible behavior from Messi).
@@jackfax too much whining... no player that played against argentina has any claim about the games. Argentina is one of the cleanest champions of the history in that 2022 WC.
This World Cup is also corruption - they've won 5pk in seven games.
Every wc Argentina won or reach final was fake
You are biased. You don’t see that two penalties were called against them in the final and without VAR? Penalties are fouls inside the box. Period. Argentina were the favorites in 1998, 2002 and 2006 but were eliminated. Stop whining.
@@Joe140000 What type of brain tells you Argentina were favorite in those years?
Like Portugal in EURO 2021, 3 pens in the group stages ALONE just to make Portugal get past group stage as best 3rd, also, 3rd place can get past the group stage since 2016 just to make Portugal get past the easiest group stage draw ever (Hungary, Iceland, Austria, Portugal)
While Croatia in 2012 had to face the most difficult draw in the group stage all-time (peak Spain (EURO 2012 champion), Italy (the 2012 EURO runner-up), Ireland, Croatia), yet the "few best 3rd at the group stage can qualify" rule wasn't applied yet, rigged for Portugal obviously as fuck
@@Joe140000 Another proof Argentina fans are primary school kids
Damn. Found a great channel in the making.
Keep up the good work👍
Thank you!
I had not heard this story before, but its very annoying that things like this happens 👎🏼
Some things never change sadly
Argentina were WORTHY winners because THEY WERE THE BEST TEAM,PERIOD.
Ese campeonato mundial fue la más grande corrupción en los campeonatos mundiales de futbol debido a que es muy curioso que Argentina le haya ganado 6 x 0 a Perú, ya que Perú tenía un muy buen equipo aquella vez. Por supuesto que hubo corrupción en ese campeonato mundial. Por lo tanto, para mí, el verdadero campeón del mundo de ese año 1.978 fue Holanda.
jajaj que lloron, les ganamos 3-1, decime, que robo hubo en esa final? Lo unico raro fue ese partido contra peru, pero siempre pasan cosas asi en el futbol, acordate que el barcelona perdio 4-0 contra el psg y el proximo partido lo gano 6-1.
Ademas que peru no tenia buen equipo, nunca lo tuvo, nunca fueron buenos, nosotros en cambio teniamos a kempes, pasarella, filliol, bertoni, etc
@@JuanCarlos-bz5pj 🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱 you can only win by cheating nazis
There is corruption in every world cup it's part of football that's why I don't follow it any more🐻🤗👍
@@JuanCarlos-bz5pj It's all the haters barking rubbish.
HACE ANOS QUE HE DIJO ESTO.
Specifically regarding the debate around the Argentina-Peru game, one version of events that is worthy of particular interest and analysis is a statement by former Peruvian senator Gennaro Ledesma, made in 2012 about the fixing being the result of a deal between the military dictatorships of Peru and Argentina, with the transfer of Peruvian political prisoners which the Peruvian junta wanted to get rid of to Argentina, in exchange for Peru's defeat in the game in question. Since Ledesma's testimony is not in itself available online, what is left are various journalistic accounts of what he said.There were indeed 2 cases of Peruvian political prisoners being transferred to Argentina, although it isn't fully clear from those reports exactly to which Ledesma was referring, so both will be examined. The one is about Ledesma himself, who was exiled in Argentina for a period of time, and the second is about a group of 13 other dissidents also transferred to Argentina. The problem with both cases is timing, as Ledesma's transfer to Argentina took place in 1976, a time when nobody could know whether Peru would play in the tournament in the first place, as the South American qualifiers hadn't even started yet. The second case took indeed place in 1978, but in May, that is before the start of the World Cup, at a time when nobody could have known that Argentina and Peru would play against each other, let alone that Argentina would need a win with an at least a 4 goal margin. Ledesma can hardly be blamed for this, as asking him to be objective and unbiased in this issue would be akin to asking concentration camp survivors to be objective and unbiased towards Nazism, but this case clearly demonstrates the need for critical examination of everything, regardless of how reliable a source may be considered, plus instant cross-checking. The fact that many journalists reported the particular statement as "evidence" of the particular game's "fixing", is journalism at its very worst.
One very recent and very similar case of how easily disinformation can spread when journalists don't do their job properly is the rumor that circulated online after Messi's penalty miss in the game vs Poland, namely that in the previous 2 Argentinian WC wins in '78 and '86 Argentina had missed a penalty in its third A round game, supposedly an omen about Argentina winning the 2022 WC, a rumor uncritically accepted and further spread by professional sports journalists, who if had even bothered to take a look at highlights from the particular games would instantly know that there was no penalty given in favor of Argentina in those games in the first place, let alone missed by Maradona, Kempes or anybody else.
Power, Corruption, & Lies-The 1978 World Cup | AFC Finners | Football History Documentary 0642am 8.8.23 that's quite a nice photo to begin the proceedings... and i am prejudiced enough, here, to agree with the title of the piece...and, no, i dont think the best team won - not that that's anything new....... but you get my drift. a lot of passion for the tournament is lost when the home team is knocked out, granted, but it's a shame when they have to win it (ie: allowed to) to bolster the political intrigue that goes on within their nation...
I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR DECADES.......NO ONE EVER BELIEVED ME. THIS SHOULD BE THE FOREVER SHAME OF PERU. AND THIS IS THE REASON WHY I WILL NEVER EVER HAVE ANY SORT OF RESPECT FOR ARGH-ENTINA.
In the final, Holland sent the ball to the post in the last minute. If the ball had gone in: Netherlands champion.
If everything was settled, why was the extension reached?
It is true that there have been very debatable cases in the Soccer World Cups, but there are too many conspiracy theories and almost none of them resist a minimum analysis.
Would of being 3-2 Argentina still would of being won
Most of the things said about the '78 WC are said by people, who although may not be professional conspiracy theorists themselves, have a way of examining things that is very similar to that of conspiracy theorists, that is a very superficial and a very selective examination of facts. Regarding the '78 WC, there is a number of questions that need to be asked and answered.
1) Was the tournament fixed? When answering this, a distinction needs to be made between intentionally or unintentionally poor refereeing and teams actually agreeing to play for a specific result. The possibility that all participating teams were part of such a deal can be dismissed with certainty, so what we are left with is the possibility of the Argentina vs Peru game having been fixed.
2) Was FIFA in collusion with the Argentinian military junta? Argentina was given the '78 WC in July 1966, almost an entire decade before the March 1976 military coup that brought into power the military regime of the 1976-83 period, which was not by far the first coup and military dictatorship in Argentina's history, but it is the most known for a variety of reasons, the '78 WC among them. Therefore the usual claim that "the WC shouldn't been hosted by Argentina which at the time was ruled by a military dictatorship which used the WC to whitewash its image" forgets that this was hardly the first such event in Argentina's history, and that the particular regime had nothing to do with Argentina's bid. In fact Argentina was at the time a country so unstable politically, with civilian and military regimes replacing each other all the time, that nobody could have been able to predict in '66 at what state Argentina would be 12 years later, and under what sort of government.
3) Was the Argentina-Peru game fixed? With no hard facts that can definitely prove what happened, what is left is speculation and theories upon theories. Before taking it for granted as many people do though, we should examine the possibility of whether the particular game can be explained in purely football terms. The main argument of those who say that the game in question cannot have been anything but fixed is that Peru won its A round group with the Netherlands in second place. They forget that Peru lost both its 2 first B round games vs Brazil and Poland and was practically out of the WC when it played vs Argentina. These variations in team performances during major tournaments are very common and were the case with other teams as well during the '78 WC. For example Austria won against all expectations, just like Peru, its A round group, and in its first B round game vs the Netherlands got thrashed 1-5. Of the top 4 teams, Argentina, Netherlands, Brazil and Italy only the latter won its A round group and it ended up in 4th place. Although the possibility of a fixing cannot be excluded, there is a very simple explanation to what happened to teams like Peru and Austria, that by having exceeded all expectations, simply didn't have the same motivation and concentration in round B, while also facing stronger opponents.
4) What about the final? One of the most bizarre claims about the '78 WC is that the Argentina vs Peru game supposed fixing "robbed" the Netherlands team. If the Argentina vs Peru game was indeed fixed, the team robbed by this result was Brazil, which hence lost the first place of B round's B group and therefore a place in the final. There is no reason for the final itself to be something particularly controversial, the refereeing was poor but not decisive for the outcome, and not much different than what was the case during the rest of the tournament, it is characteristic that despite the many fouls and harsh play only 3 players were sent off during the '78 WC.
5) Is Videla's and Kissinger's presence in the Argentina-Peru game an evidence of fixing? When watching footage of various matches of the '78 WC, somebody can see Videla present in most games, not just Argentina's, while Kissinger can be seen in archive footage of several major tournaments sitting in stadium seats reserved for officials. Claims made by Jon Spurling that Kissinger spoke in the opening ceremony are evidently false for anybody who has watched the footage, with speeches made only by Cantilo, who was the head of the AFA (the Argentine football federation) at the time, Havelange and Videla. Kissinger is actually nowhere to be seen in the footage of the opening ceremony, on the contrary he can be seen in that of the closing ceremony, in the stadium section reserved for foreign ambassadors and diplomats.
Pessi dog
@@PessiTheFraudgreat rebuttal
@@YeTism Shut up please
1930??
The Uruguayan Police, at halftime, entered the Argentina dressing room and attacked the players.
1934 & 1938??
Fascist Italy, by Benito Mussolini, World Champion with 4 Players from Argentina, including the best player in the World of the time, Raimundo Orsi.
In both finals, the Italian team received a telegram from Mussolini: "Vincere o morire." (win or die)
1954??
Germany stole the World Cup from Hungary, the players were doped with injections of pervitin, a doping methamphetamine (the same drug that was supplied to the SS Soldiers).
1966??
In the Semifinal, Argentina vs England, the German referee (guess which teams played in the final) sent off Argentina's best player, Antonio Rattin, because the player looked at the referee with bad eyes and considered it an aggression.
Due to this controversy, the English referee Ken Aston presented a project to FIFA, Red and Yellow Cards, a project that was approved.
What happened in the 1966 final was another scandal.
Different opinions are welcome, and 78 is far from the only example of World Cup corruption, I just think it’s the one with the most examples of bent rules. In terms of the examples you have given.
1930-Admittedly I didn’t know about that incident, I’m sure I’ll cover first World Cup at some point so will read into that more.
34/38-Agree with you and have read about the corruption alleged in those two wins, again intend to cover that topic in the future.
1954-I have covered this in my video about the Magical Magyars, tbh from what I’ve read it’s hard to draw a certain conclusion, however it is strange west Germany would do that considering they lost 8-3 before and how good Hungary were.
66-Bias towards hosts is sadly common, as seen in this video, and other examples include Neymar’s penalty in 2014 and 2002 World Cup. So whilst I agree, it seems to be a common theme for world cups.
Whilst Hurst’s goal was a controversial decision, i believe England would have won that game whether it was given or not. I do certainly believe it’s possible they gave into pressure of home crowd, but I think they probably would have scored soon after anyway.
@@afcfinners
We entered the plane of assumptions, anything could have happened, the truth is that it was a phantom goal.
If the Munich tragedy had not happened, perhaps England would have 2 World Cups, if Argentina had gone to the 1938, 1950, and 1954 World Cups (where Argentina won all the American Cups, and all the friendlies against the powers of Europe), Maybe Argentina would have 4 or 5 World Cups, we will never know, so I only base myself on the facts, and not on what could have been and was not.
England had a great team, as did Argentina and Germany, but it is not healthy for the sport that the referees of the Semifinals are precisely from the 2 countries that go to the final, and that happened in 1966.
Denying that from 76 to 83 there was a dictatorship in Argentina is silly, but in Korea and Japan there were more controversial parties, with 2 countries in Democracy, as you mentioned in your comment.
In 1966 Argentina reached the Quarter Finals , not the semi finals.
Why argentina peru didn't played the same time like poland Brazil?
@@charlenegatt1769 unfortunately this was standard practice until it was changed after the controversy caused by the Austria v. West Germany group game at the 1982 World Cup
great watch - clicked on in the backdrop of Qatar
Qatar, more fraud for Argentina.
Daniel Bertoni.
Excellent apart from that.
Argentina es pura trampa. Bilardo y sus alfileres, Ls Copa de 78.....cambiando el horario del partido de Brasil, la agua batizada de Branco en el Mundial de 1990.
Argentina has great players and they do NOT deserve those two cups they have.
Cheaters
Cheaters ? Europe national did cheat too
F**k hatred 🤣😅
Cry, we have a third now
@@DotaEnthusiast-fm8jdwhich they also don’t deserve…..
@@knorrie63 Never more deserved than 2022 WC, sorry for you. The best football was played by Argentina.
Remember italy beat Argentina in their first game - çould easily have lost to France or drew - the Dutch Very Nearly took the WC home with em - so what if peru got spangled .
Only 2022 wc is deserved.
@@adammamdani3501they were pens. Move on
@@KcKnightX penalties come from fouls, fouls because no nation could stop Argentine's goals...
Argentina... 1978, 1986. .. all not good. But i love Argentina for crespo
So much seething both in the commentaries and in the video. No hard evidence, only assumptions. The 6-0 was debunked even by the Peruvian players. (They lost 3-0 against Brasil and 1-0 against Poland, they were already disqualified, so much for "the best Perú in the world. In top of that they haven't won a game against us since 1970)
Maybe who do this video was heavily involved and was apart of Argentina, bearurcracy
Both of Argentina world cups are invalid .
Yeah...like u
What about this one? Dummy
Even this one but it looked awesome tbf and Messi is da 🐐.
@@SultanuDeen Pele is the goat
Now there are three they cheated in
They needed to make Pessi champion
1978 and 2002 were rigged.
video has so many lies and unproven things until they changed Bertoni's name from Daniel to Ricardo😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Rats
I love the salty tears of people telling us how we cheated in all 3 of our World Cup wins ⭐️⭐️⭐️
I’ve done a video praising your performance in 86 (even though Maradona literally scored a goal with his hand) and celebrated with joy when you beat France in the final…
@@afcfinnersI DON’T CARE IF YALL CALL US CHEATERS, this is a sport where anyone will do anything to win.
@@scaryvalidation yet you commented on a video to complain about me calling you cheaters, strange way of not caring 😂
@@afcfinners I didn’t complain where did I complain exactly???? I enjoy how pissed off You aré Because How You feel that we cheated 😂
@@scaryvalidation Your first comment accusing us of being salty for one, then you said you don't care about being called cheaters, so much you decided to write a comment expressing how little you cared. Like I said, I was delighted you won the world cup last year. For the record I'm not pissed you cheated in 86, if an English player had punched the ball in they'd have got as much praise. But you can't tell me punching a ball into the net isn't cheating.
Soy peruano y recuerdo ese partido con argentina lo ví por televisión y me acuerdo que ni los comentaristas deportivos de esa época aceptaban ese resultado es más cuando comenzó el segundo tiempo cambiaron de opinión como si hubieran Sido forzados por los militares que gobernaban mi país en esa época,el resultado fue escandaloso ,argentina compro ese mundial y Perú se vendió ,es increíble como el poder de la mafia militar argentina se movió para semejante fraude,!!
Another great job. Like, comment, and subscribe to support the channel everyone.
A bit like englands world cup 1966. You didn't win that one you stole it. Look in the mirror before throwing accusations.
How did England steal it? Genuine question. Also technically yes that world cup was stolen, but fortunately found by a dog named Pickles!