DPReview TV: Nikkor 24-70mm F2.8 S - The First Great Nikon Standard Zoom?
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
- This week Chris and Jordan review the Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 S for Z-mount, a lens many photographers consider to be the foundation of the 'holy trinity' of zoom lenses. Does it measure up to the high expectations set by Nikon? Tune in to find out.
Music provided by BeatSuite.com
www.beatsuite.com
-----------------------
DPReview.com is the world's largest digital camera review website. Welcome to our CZcams channel! Subscribe for new feature videos, reviews, interviews and more.
Discover the world's most in-depth digital camera reviews at www.dpreview.com
Reasonable, supportive and uplifting.
Come to think of it: He didn't tell us where to leave those other comments...
Andy Seward sounds like an underwire bra😊
@@kevins2684 Haha what an idiot. You kevin .
No,you’re a beast Chris. That intro was hilarious.
I got it and it is better than my old Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 (old one, no VR).
The only lens I will be adding will be the 70-200 f/2.8 S when it becomes available.
The out-of-focus area is very smooth. The new S line lens are really impressive.
Thank you for always not doing the clickbait crap and just producing high quality content.
Did anyone else freak out seeing a $2k lens and $3k camera balanced on the bridge?
6" wide camera on 6" wide piece of wood you mean? no basic physics.
@@rollandelliott I would find a way to knock it off!
@@rollandelliott You mean, a maximum of 3" of room for it to move before it falls down? That's pretty scary.
I do wonder when I see reviews like this why someone would take this chance or even set the camera on a rocky surface next to water. I would have at the very least a hand strap attached to it.
This lens has been glued to my Z6 since I got it. The best 24-70 f2.8 I've ever owned, and I've had several.
That intro was damn Hilarious 😂👌
Ahh, now that you mention it, I see it. I thought it was Polin.
Yes it was :-) Their humour just makes their videos stand out even more from all the shouters out there.
It reminded me of a video they did a while back on how to create smooth videos and cuts with using B-roll footage. The intro to that video also was a round-up on how not to do it, hectic, fast cuts, and afterwards we saw Jordan in front of the laptop going "What have I done?!".
Resembled more with Peter McCanon.. 😉🤘🏼
Mocks so many photography-related CZcamsrs and I love it.
Don't care what people say you guys are the best gear reviewers (not DP review) you and Jordan, congrats guys.
Chris! would really love to see the Tamron 17-28mm 2.8 vs the Sony Gmaster 16-35mm 2.8.
With a $1300 price diffrence its a comparison ALOT of us want to see.
If you can't test them all on the same bodies, the results would be more flawed than the standard non-scientific comparison.
Nice job boys.... As always... What truly blows me away , with all the new choices for video work , Jordan continues to rock the GH5....😎
Thanks for the video! My 24-70 2.8s fails to recognize face/eye. is the function only a camera side? or a lens might be damaged?
Nikon is Really doing AMAZING job on the S lenses ! They are all sharp and perfect
The size is huge tho
@@Goonercry it's a 2.8 zoom....what do you expect
@@AcidicDelusion i mean compared to other brands like canon and tamron, it noticeably bigger
Not sure about the dimensionality on all of them. Sharpness is only one criteria.
@@aussie8114 i honestly think if size and weigh are not put in consider when producing lenses, all manufacturers can make lenses with perfect image quality.
y'all just destroyed half of photo youtube with that cold open
If I could thumbs up this comment 1k times, I would. Gawd I hate those in-your-face CZcamsrs...
At this quality of execution and roadmap, Nikon will be go to ecosystem for FF mirrorless in 3 years!
WTF GRAMMAR FAIL
I don't think so 😎
@@soundknight And your "sentence" has good grammar?
Sony is FAR ahead of Nikon with respect to mirrorless lenses. There are many, many, many more available, and among them are some of the best lenses in the world (90mm macro, 24mm f/1.4, etc.). What makes you think Nikon will not only catch up but surpass them? Even if Sony and all 3rd parties completely quit making E-mount lenses for 3 years, Nikon wouldn't have caught up by then.
@@soundknight Sorry about that but I thought CZcamsrs like yourselves are smart enough to understand what I meant!
I've had this combo for a few months, and must say I love the lens. :)
I’ve been on the fence about this purchasing this lens and I do believe that I’ll make the commitment and go forth with it! Thanks Chris for the remarkable review!
Nice review. It also appears to be the best 24-70 2.8 on any mount ever made.
Its the newest so anything else would have been shit...
@@bjure8111 True, but if you are using a Sony it may be many years until you get a lens of similar caliber.
Bokeh is actually great, one of the smoothest in a 24-70!
Not as smooth as that body
Wishing you a reasonably supportive and uplifting day Chris!
Was that the z7ii the whole time or did you use the z6ii as well.
Just booked mine for the Z6 its a very expensive lens ... But what needs to be done has to be done so can't complain and glass upgrades are always worth it..
This is a reasonable, supportive, uplifting and well mannered comment.
The biggest problem with this lens is how the 24-70mm f/4 is so damned good, it's hard to justify the upgrade because I'm so happy with what I already have.
Nikon is killing it with these lenses.
Exactly my problem I can't justify the upgrade, I rather buy the 70-200 2.8 VR S
In Low light f2.8 is better in my opinion?
Reasonable, supportive and uplifting.... No, No Chris, your hair is not turning gray on the edges. It is just old chromatic aberrations. But a good review and comments ;-)
Excellent, well balanced not-to-technical review. Well done Chris.
Had a chance to try this lens out last weekend. It's stunning. I've been using my 24-70 2.8 VR with FTZ but this release is very tempting formal the reasons you've outlined in this video.
Would be extremely interesting to see you test this lens out on say the Z6 in more difficult low light situations like concerts and other events. Nice well rounded review! And the intro had me falling off my chair, that was spot on.
Been waiting for this review for months guys!!!! Thank you!!
When this review started out I was confused and looking for an afro. All fun aside , it’s looking like Nikon is developing some very nice performing lenses. Especially for video. No focus breathing is nice . I understand they are focus by wire so how easy is it to do manual focus pulls with this lens . Also what’s the word on Nikon updating the firmware in all their Zed mount lenses for good manual focus pulls in video ? And how is this lens when zooming during video? Does it stay in focus? Par focal I guess is what that is called .
Thanks for your great reviews
I would say that the Z 24-70 f/2.8 S is probably Nikons greatest 24-70. Maybe not necessarily the best among what's out there for other brands, but as far as I'm concerned, it's the best one yet out of the 3 I've owned (first the older 2.8G ED version, then the 2.8E version--the most current F-mount version, and now the Z version).
Can you do a review on that Techart PRO Autofocus Adapter for Sony E-Mount to nikon z mount with some sony lenes on the nikon z system?
Yes I too would like to see that. Maybe the 16-35mm GM on a Z7 ? and compare the 35mm range of the Sony to the 35mm of the Z 24-70
Damn, that intro sounded like FroKnows$hit 😂
Oh fuck i cant unrelate to that
zapiollin He $hits RAW.
Ugh. Just ordered the f/2.8 after debating with self over the f/4 for several months. Just realized that the lens extends externally and isn’t internally housed like I hoped. I do look forward to owning it. Thanks for the review.
You do good reviews. You cover a lot. No mention of image dimensionality but can see from the samples it does not look flat. I do wonder if buying the Z6 whether the f4 is a far wiser choice when considering its about $900 when purchased with the body vs about $3,200 for the f2.8. However for the Z7 the f2.8 is a fine match.
This is how you do a proper review !
Hey Chris, nice informative video thanks, but not being familiar with you before, that beginning almost had me skipping until I realised it was a joke 😂
Cheers
That screen on the lens looks great!
Well done Nikon!
I’ll wait for the Tamron 2.8 version, that will be more affordable. Thanks for the vid 👍🏻
2022.
Nice vlog. Informative. The idea is to tell ""a story"" and inform. You don't need the first seconds for attention.
I can appreciate the comment about the focus speed compared to the older DSLR versions... the 2.8 lenses have always been tremendously fast focusing lenses! A lot of professional photographers who have become accustom to that will appreciate the heads up!
Just bought it and cannot wait to compare it with my 24-70 2.8 VR. Being light means a lighter backpack... that's already good news.
wish you had compared it to the Z f4 version for those considering upgrade or not
I thumb-up the video on my first sight of the intro.
Hey Chris the day u left TCSTV I left it too.....
Love the review. Very informative! Thanks
I have a older 24-70 f2.8. It does not have vr. Do you think the z lense is much better?
damn, what shoes is Chris rocking in this video? those are so cool.
Brava! Proper job! Thank you. I’ve decided: I’m buying one.
well explained. but is it really worth the upgrade from the f4?
Coming from the old "Beast" (28-70) I am very pleased about the lens and specialy about the low-light capability with the in-camera integrated stabilisation.
It's a pitty that there are no autofocus speed (near to infinity -> how many [ms]? or 2m->infinity) values exists to compare the lenses.
Coolness from Chris! Thanks so much for helpful video, you guys! Cheers,
Great video as always team.
Some feedback though:
I think this video had a few too many shots of Chris in the park talking to the camera while just holding the z6 in his hand or it beside him on a rail.
I think that your other videos do a better job of balancing these shots with shots of usage.
What do you think of Z6 for video? I see you are using gh5 which is surprising giving the Z6 is full frame and offers 4K 30fps.
Where did you see tulips in August? Very interesting.
Would either 24-70 lens work on the Z50. Would it be worth it to ut one of these lenses on the Z50?
Basically an infomercial. Maybe someone actually will show how specific settings affect specific results? Still looking for that video.
Intro - you missed saying - buttery smooth - tac sharp - super this and super that - or you guys - and always end with - peace. 😆
And god forsake.. dont miss out compelling.....
Hi Chris, nice review. I noticed you said that the 24-70 2.8 S has a bit slower autofocus. Is there any chance you can cast some light on that very important issue some more?
Hi Guys
Can you help me decide ??
For a better result of sharpness in my photos, which combination is better?
Z6 + 24-70 f2.8 or Z7 + 24-70 f4 ????
Unfortunately I have no money for 2.8 and Z7... lol....
Thanks
I would go Z6 + F2.8. You're probably going to upgrade the body in a few years but this lens should last 4 times that, and have a better resale value if you ever decide to sell it. If the slower AF speed is okay with you , the Z6 F2.8 combo should offer some great low light capability and less noise overall.
Hi DPReview (Chris & Jordan), thank you very much for your extremely useful work. I wondered, related to Nikon if you know anything about what they promised us all about the impressive update that they were going to provide us this summer. I have acquired a Z6 in the hope of being able to finally record on ProRes Raw, as I suppose many of us. It would be exciting if you could create a chapter talking about what is known so far. I am confused about, that no one talks about it, and that Nikon maintains, now for more than six months, this silence. Ps. The 50/1.8 S is amazing too.
Great review confirming the lens would be very useful for me. Just the price needs to come down a little for me to justify spending to add to/replace my 24-70 f2.8 F-mount VR & 24-70 f4 S lenses
Love the work y'all do.
How much advantage is 2.8 against F4 as the price gap is too much. Also suggest on compatibility of F mount Tamron 24-70 2.8.
you are saying the auto focus speed or response is slow, can this be because in a dslr there is a Seperate focus electronics (engine) which makes the speed faster than a mirror less camera, which presumably would do everything off the main chip from the sensor itself, and hence have a slower response due to prioritizing the time of the chip to many duties.
I'm really enjoying this lens for video use with my Z6 but man, focus by wire sucks for video work. Great review man.
A Sage shirt now - much better action than the Loop.. ;)
Great info as always, Sir.
I can go from EOS M50 + Sigma 16mm 1.4 to Z7 II and this lens in a month but I'm wondering what the Z8 will be.
Love all y'all's videos
Good review, thanks
Do you think it focuses faster than it’s f4 sibling?
I just picked this lens up and I love it!! Now - where the hell is the 70-200?
Awesome review. I would like to own this lens one day. ✌
Truly fantastic optics in this lens. But what's up with those sensor reflections? I've honestly never seen that in any other camera or in any of my mirrorless cameras shooting into heavy backlight or flair. Is this a problem for this lens in particular because of the rear element? Does this occur on other cameras?
Nice review as always, Chris! As a landscape and product STILLS X-T3 shooter (no video), I have been debating on selling my Fuji kit (reluctantly), and moving into FF, specifically the Nikon Z7 (or the Sony a7Rlll). Since I shoot 99% tripod-mounted, neither IBIS nor video interests me. So, my question is, for large print output (around 24"x 36" prints), how much of an improvement in terms of image sharpness, detail rendition, dynamic range, base ISO performance, etc., would I see over the already excellent X-T3? And, pardon my phonetic ignorance, but why pronounce "Z" as "Zed"? Thanks!
What was this video recorded on? GH5?
Great work - thanks!
Thanks Chris. I believe you hit all the poimts I had on my minds to ask. It seems like this is the right 24-70 f2.8 lens to use with the Z cameras. My 24 -70 with built in image stabilization would be way to heavy to carry, Thanks for your review. 📷 👍 😆
that intro is a beast!
Is that a Peter Mckinnon impression in the beginning? Lol 😂
Nice review. I'm disappointed at the AF speed compared to the DSLR versions though. I love the top display panel and the general overall compactness compared to the DSLR variants
It would be nice if you would mention if the manual focus for video is fly by wire and whether you can set it to linear somehow for repeatable focus changes. It would also be interesting if you would film the episode on Nikon Z6 and this lens so we would see more how it performs in video. There could also be focal lenght and aperture somewhere in the corner.
Thanks anyway
Which one is better, this one or canon rf?
If i use this lens with sony a7r iv .Which mount i use....plz plz plz help me
You can't mount a Nikon Z lens on the Sony E mount. You can mount Sony lenses on the Nikon Z cameras.
i want the music you used in Video during showing images
I love your reviews, tone and humour. Very helpful when trying to decide which system to go for. Thanks!
Jordan, is this shot with the 10-25?
Thanks for taking a swipe at those obnoxious "reviewers" on this platform. 👍👍👍
Just needed to throw in some background RGB and it would have been the full package.
will it work with D7200
Is that sensor dust @ 6.15?
Hi Chris,
I know you are busy with photoshoots, family, filming reviews etc. but i really need your guidance here.
I have ordered fuji xt30 and its going to arrive on 8th august approx.
i was quite sure about the fuji xt30 with 16mm f1.4 and 56mm f1.2 untill i saw videos on sony a6400.
I m mainly into photography and have no interest in vlogging or videography. My main concerns are image quality, ergonomics (comfortable to handle), ease of use.
Plus the camera and lens combination that i have been planning is expensive on fujifilm side compared to sonya6400+sigma 1.6mm f1.4 and sigma 56mm f1.4.
I would really appreciate it if you please help me on this as soon as you can.
Thank you so much Chris
The Fuji is better built, has far better handling, more rugged, better supported so stick with what you ordered and forget comparing any cameras. it only distracts you from what really matters; light, composition, and point of view. If you capture a great image or a poor image, it is not the camera, it is you. Every camera made today is perfectly capable of award-winning images. Most of the differences now are just handling and a few features that make no difference.
Excellent video
Great review, yes the cost is getting up there ....
Nice to see Nikon producing some great lenses for the s line up. If only they were more competitive on price when they launched they could be killing it now. In my humble opinion if they had gone z7 £2400 z6 £1900 35 1.8s £490 50 1.8s £490 24-70 f4 £600 24-70 2.8 £1300 they would have placed themselves in such a good position. You can’t gain or your financial losses with a new product you have to play the long game.
Was that a walk and talk gimbal shot near the end, or did Jordan lean to moonwalk on grass? If so, what gimbal or kind of grass was that?
Finally. The real Chris Nichols has returned. Welcome back.
I am waiting for the Tamrons and Sigmas before diving into the Z-Mount life... Otherwise that is a great lens
Norman Eshuchi the z6 is very Good. Only XQD is still very expensive
Actually, Jordan, I thought the ironic intro was spot on 😊