2024 Mazda CX-5 / Fight Against Time
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 06. 2024
- With the generation likely coming to a close, it's time to fully evaluate the Mazda CX-5 for old time's sake AND to discuss how it still has what it takes to face the newer Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, Nissan Rogue, Subaru Forester, Hyundai Tucson and countless others.
If you really enjoy these types of videos, please consider supporting me on Patreon!
/ realistick
Follow me on TikTok for Car goofs and Instagram for channel/life updates!
TikTok - Realistick_
/ realistick_
Instagram - Tpark3030
/ tpark3030 - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Carbon (non-turbo) still gets unpainted fender trim. 1:04
Ah yes you’re right, for some reason I thought they painted it black like they did the Carbon Turbo!
@@Realistick But ocean of way uglier plastics don't bother on Subbies 🤣🤣👌😉
The fact that this particular model is still assembled in Japan put me over the top to buy my 2023 CX 5 Carbon Edition. I love it!!
MIJ all day. had a made in japan 2011 mazda 3 for 10 years, no probs at all. just bought a 2024 cx5 carbon and the fact that its MIJ was 50% of my deciding factor :)
The Porsche 911 has evolved slowly over the last 60 years, yet no ever calls it old or outdated. I strongly believe in honing a product with incremental improvements, not scrapping it after 6 or 7 years and starting all over again.
A word about trims. I'm in the Chicago area. Back in early September I bought a 2024 CX-5 Premium in Deep Crystal Blue Mica for my wife...absolutely beautiful and no paint surcharge! Got it at $1,000 below MSRP. It only had wheel locks, all weather mats and a rear step pad as required accessories (all of which were fine with me). Many come with installed roof rails which not only cost $450 but to me actually detract from the car. There are many other port installed options like mud guards, cargo mats, privacy covers, seat guards you name it which become part of the sticker price so trying to get what you want the way you want can be a challenge. I think I just got lucky. It was in transit and arriving in a week.
Couldn't see going for the next step up Premium Plus trim for an additional $2,700 as only a heated steering wheel interested her. Didn't need wireless Apple/Android, cell phone charger, heated rear seats heads up display etc. But that's a personal preference. I also I drove both the Turbo and the Non Turbo prior to purchase and the Non Turbo is plenty quick especially in sport mode. She recently caught herself going 80 down the expressway not realizing it since the car is so quiet. So that tells you a little about sound insulation as well as power.
It is a wonderfully designed, well thought out car both inside and out. The workmanship is impeccable. The interior is very luxury like. It's been around for quite a while so thoroughly tested. In my opinion it is one of the best deals out there in this crazy market. I say, if it fits your needs, my recommendation is...buy one!
And with 0% financing remaining for the next few days...an amazing value as well. We just picked up our '24 CX-5 Turbo Premium last week and love it so far.
I would agree with most things that you have said but HUD is one of the best drivers aids out there and it should be on every car, it’s just so much safer to keep your eyes on the road and have all that information still available.
Where'd you shop in Chicago area?
@@davidrapp1152 Napleton's Palatine Mazda
6 years, my 2017 has had no problems.
I agree 100% with your last suggestions, increase the rear seating, improve seat comfort, and provide a hybrid.
I've owned the 2023 Turbo for over a year and completely enjoy it. Those 3 items are my only complaints.
I really hope they can just address those things and freshen it up a little without going overboard and increasing the cost a ton!
You're asking for a CX-70.
We plan to buy one of these for one simple reason - reliability. The powertrain dates back to 2014 on the previous generation CX-5 which carried over with the last redesign to this version in 2017. With 10 years of experience building the four cylinder engines with a 6 speed transmission, this car is virtually guaranteed to last at least 200,000 with few problems. I have bought my last few cars this way and every time the car lasts 200,000 no problem. 2006 Saab 9-3 lasted 195,000 and I sold it - the second owner has the original powertrain with 270,000 now. Still own 2013 Subaru Legacy H6 engine with 5 speed automatic now with almost 150,000 and no problems. Also a 2018 Buick Envision with the 10 year old turbo engine and 6 speed automatic with 79,000 and no problems. Plan for all of these to last 200,000. note the Honda CR-V you cannot get fog lights - living on a mountain that gets fog and snow, this is a definate no for me.
It's rare that I agree 100% with a vehicle video review, but I do in this instance. I've been driving Mazdas for over 20 years now, and after test driving the new 6th Gen CR-V, I was ready to jump ship and get one. Why didn't I? The CR-V not having a spare tire really irked me, and no ventilated seats (because Florida), but then Mazda offered 0% for 60 months on a new CX-5. I simply couldn't pass it up. 7th Mazda is officially in the books. I went for the Turbo Premium, and I'm not looking back :)
Love my 0% Turbo Premium!
My thoughts exactly. I was close to buying a 2024 CR-V Hybrid but the lack of spare tire was a bummer. Also I didn't want to spend top dollar on the Touring to get the Bose stereo. When Mazda offered 0% 60 months, I picked up a CX-5 Turbo Premium. And I also live in Florida. Got the Bose and the ventilated seats are nice to have here.
I purchased the 2024 Select trim Platinum Quartz color. It simply is a classic. The fact is it is fun to drive and handles great. It sells for thousands less than a similar SUV. It’s a SUV that drives like a sports car.
I’m buying this INSHA ALLAH
Always enjoy your reviews! Looking forward to the next one! ❤️
Today I saw someone hustling one of these on a backroad like it was a sports sedan 😂
Making it an even greater value proposition, they're offering 0% APR for up to 60/72 months in the States.
The 0% goes up to 63 months...72 months at 1.9%. Just picked up my '24 CX-5 Turbo Premium last week at 0%. Makes this an unbelievable value. Love it for all the reasons stated. We also keep cars until the wheels fall off and lack of CVT and hybrid is a plus for us as any out of warranty repairs to those items can be scary expensive.
@@imkindofabigdeal4308 Awesome deal! My local dealer was offering 0% for 72 months, but only to a max loan of $20k. It was 1.9% for 72 from Mazda.
I was planning to take advantage, then I got the flu. =( Missed out on any selection at local dealers. Ended up buying a CPO '23 Premium (loaner, 6k miles) for $28,500 and 7.25%. I'm happy. I got the Sonic Silver, which they dropped for '24. Which color di you get?
Just took advantage of the 1.9 at 72 months. Couldn’t pass it up, plus being employee. Got the premium for much less
@@imkindofabigdeal4308turbo is also expensive repairs.
I wish Mazda would release a hybrid CX-5 or hybrid CX-30 already
It would be great to see, I know they’re working on it
I love that he points out things that could improve or things that other manufacturer comes with. It helps you make a decision on what is best for you. Most reviewers just point out that they believe is good
I purchased my 2022 Mazda CX-5 premium plus new, I'm really impressed with this as it's my first Mazda. It's been a perfect daily driver for me
No need to fight against time, Mazda design is aging best in the class and due to reliable drivetrain types and build quality this CX-5 will last for a long time , look clean and fresh for a while .
Something that other Japanese brands can't say due to weird and off looking designs , poor and cheap drivetrain choices .
Yes Nissans , Subbies, Hondas.
Only Toyota can last as long but it ages quicker than Mazda as it looks not as clean and timeless as Mazda.
Always love your videos
Watching from India ❤
If the CX-50 had an rear independent suspension or if the next gen CX-5 became a little wider. Visually the CX-50 wins because of the extra width but I'd rather have the made in Japan build quality of the CX-5
It also needs to more rear space. With anyone with a rear facing car seat, it's very tight fit. You're almost forced to pick the CRV or Kia/Hyundai.
@@Ash_Rahmaniit’s really not that bad. An advantage over the competitors you mentioned is that the CX-5 has a much smaller footprint and is easier to maneuver and park. But if you really need more space those others would be a better option. I like how compact the CX-5 is though.
I test drove both cx-5 and Cx-50 and you don't feel the difference between the 2 suspensions in the rear. You'd only feel a difference if you were racing with your car.
The cx70 is coming to the United States (made in japan) and they are thinking of also brining the cx 60 into the United States. The cx60 is a slightly larger verison on the cx5
@volcomrive What is the cx 70... it a lot bigger than the cx5?
I bought the 2024 CX50 base model and i absolutely love it.
Nice review. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for watching!
I’m on my third cx5 in a row. I enjoy it more than my Mercedes GL. Great value.
I just FINALLY took delivery of our new 2024 CX5 Signature . We LOVE it
I’m sure that you must have had the front seat all the way back ( for your driving position ) when you tested the back seat space .
My son is over 6 ft and he fits well into the rear seats without any legs left or right of the front seat. In fact he had 4 inches to spare !
I have watched MANY CX5 videos since we ordered our vehicle in March and I think yours is the best one out there. ( although a winter one would have been great too)
Well ,….as they USED to say …..ZOOM ZOOM. 😊
What color is your signature?
Soul Red
Love the looks of both the cx 5 and 50
I love my carbon edition.drives well and yes i wish it had more power ,but i didnt buy it for speed. I will be buying another one soon.
Nice honest review!
Great review. I agree with all of your points, except for your take on the seats. I absolutely love the leather and lack of bolstering. Gravity on my caboose in the seat and the limits of the engine and handling to keep me in the seat fine. The problem with bolstering at this price range is that the raised door-side edge will get constant contact as the driver gets in and out of the car, which breaks down the foam underneath and "deflates" the bolster. The competition's leather, both in quality and unnecessary bolstering, are enough for me to eliminate them from contention. The unaspirated, front-wheel driver models drive smooth with surprising power for daily driving tasks.
My niggles: Small gas tank. Odd heating/cooling/thermostat issues, covered under warranty for now. A bit of a trek to the nearest dealership for service.
Thanks, I suppose the bolstering on these can be mild, I wouldn't want much more than it has, but just a little more for my taste. The thigh support is what I really hope Mazda addresses!
@@Realistick For people on the shorter side of average, the seats are pretty good IMO. And at our seating position, the back seats have pretty good room (as you pointed out at 6'3"). For soon-to-be empty nesters that still remember cars that were engaging to drive...our CX-5 is perfect.
I was worried that I wouldn't like the seats on the CX-5 after all the comments I have read about the seats but it turns out I love them. Firm but comfortable even on longer drives for me at 5`10". Just drove it for 2.5 hours. No problem. I agree that agressive bolsters are good if you fit well inside them well. If not they can dig into your hip and they do get worn getting in and out of the vehicle.
"Basketball seat trim". Funny!
Sound of the doors, and the hood/trunk areas...very good sound. No "thunk!"
Test drove one few days ago and was impressed. Good engine with very good transmission though, 1st and 2nd gear with regular off line acceleration was quicker in wanting to get to 3rd and higher gears.
Quiet...yes! I like that!
Its beautiful!!
Great video on the mazda cx5 keep up the good work as a expert on vehicle which make four cylinders engine would you personally owned and would it be a turbo four cylinders engine or a natural aspirated four cylinders engine please respond stay safe.
Love my '22 Signature. I just hope that Mazda doesn't cancel this model since I do not care for the CX-50.
Have you had any issues? We're considering getting a signature trim as well; worried about the reliability of the turbo.
It's been a great vehicle for my family. I'd buy another one if we were in the market. Fun, fast, exceptional handling, kick butt Bose sound... every feature I want and none of the extra useless crap like stop/start or those annoying video feeds from every direction.
It's a vehicle for people who know and enjoy driving. It's for purists, by design. Plus she's handsome. When we first got ours in 2016, I would get compliments on her constantly.
This was an awesome, in-depth, and informative review!
I totally agree that the Honda CR-V Hybrid is comparable, but the increase in price makes it not as appealing.The biggest problem though is the lack of a spare tire - a total deal breaker.
Curious to see how Mazda addresses some of the points you brought up in either future iterations or improving the CX-50.
In 2012 I cross shopped the CX5 and Subaru Outback... wife liked the Outback better, I liked the CX5... got the Outback. 12 years later, I am cross shopping the 2024 Outback and 2024 CX5 and CX50... Outback in the lead based on our initial research... test drives to come.
Simple functions is comfortable - no lie . It’s a great quality engine and The cabin is GREAT ❤
Jumping in on the ride commentary… my dad is very picky about a quiet and smooth ride and, after only a few days driving it, he thinks the CX-5 is better than the Subaru Outback we traded for it. I do wish the rear had more room (our 2016 CR-V wins for “trunk” space).
Great video. Is that an A7C I see you're using on the windshield? If so, is that what you've used for most of your B-roll? Any feedback on how you've liked it? Or is it the newer A7C II? Great channel!
Good eye! I’ve really liked it, ive found it to be sharp, and it’s approachable in post production. I have the first model, the stabilization improvements and the ability to go 4k 60 (with a crop) would be great versus my 4k 30. I think the new one also does 10 bit which would be nice but far from necessary. Id definitely recommend the first gen a7c if you’re looking for an affordable full frame on the used market!
Thanks for the info! Last question(s)! Are you using a gimbal to stabilize your b-roll and A-roll? Catalyst Browse? It looks great! Or are you just slowing down your 4K30 or even 1080P at a higher frame rate? Sorry for all the questions, I just really appreciate your video quality and it appears you don't have a lot of help behind the camera, beyond maybe one person? Which makes it all that more impressive!@@Realistick
No problem and thanks! Just the standard ronin rs3 gimbal@@RaceGasSmellsGood
The mazda 6 signature much much more fun to drive, hopefully it will return to n America.
I just picked up a ‘24 s select. Love the ride but there’s definitely a drony noise and I’m not sure if it’s because of these. Stock tires? Thoughts?
Amazing
they are a lot of people out there where like more older Cars as newer. Thanks 😀
We have 3 CX-5s; a 2013, 2015 and 2018. I am thinking it might be best to wait until there are more used Ford Mavericks available, the hybrid for better gas mileage or the ecoboost for all wheel drive or towing. Or the CX-30 and rent a minivan for longer trips with 4 or more people. We do at least 3 test drives for each possibility over a few weeks, it is possible we get another CX-5. We like the steering feel the most. The seats feel too firm at first, but are quite comfortable for a longer drive. The Maverick stereo would need some aftermarket add ons. We like the Pirelli P7 Cinturato tires the best, quiet smooth and they last 70 thousand miles.
Steering wheel on the 2024 Carbon Edition CX-5 is adjustable.
I thought the base model select did have wireless Apple CarPlay?
Car reviewers have really messed up the car industry.....the touch screens that are a nightmare to work with while driving, the lines that make cars look like high tech military jets et al. People buy a car to own for years, not 12 months
Maybe I’m alone
But now looking at it, I prefer the plastic cladding trim versus the colored trim. It makes it look a bit odd.
Carbon non-turbo still has the cladding! (My mistake)
One of the best takes I’ve seen. A next-gen CX5 with just a tad more length and width, digi display and a hybrid option would absolutely kill in this segment. The CX50 loses the upright, nimble quality that made the 5 a best-seller. Mazda’s thinking on this has been mystifying.
Currently trying to decide if I want the turbo. The 0% financing might justify it. The “base” Select trim is fantastic to drive, but the turbo torque is lovely.
Turbo engines don't age/wear well & certain driving & maintenance routines will kill them prematurely. Look up the Car Care Nut video on Turbo engines & watch it before making a decision.
@@dystopia-usa I’ve had many turbo engines from several brands, including VW, Ford, and the older 2.3 Mazda turbo. I’m not at all concerned about this generation of Mazda turbo Skyactiv. It’s worked out all the issues and I’m willing to do the proper maintenance. I’m not hard on vehicles and don’t put on more than 5k-7k miles per year.
@@dystopia-usa Good suggestion. We will be using ours mostly on a longish commute (58 miles per day)...not a lot of short trips. We're fussy about maintenance and will follow the most aggressive schedule.
Just change oil every 4K
The Teddy Baldassarre of cars.
They should do a collaboration
Does it have cylinder deactivation?
I just bought the Signature Turbo. I am optimistic that this car will give me a good 10 years. It feels like you are part of driving it. I don't want the car to drive me (though this one does kinda!). I drove Lexus and I appreciated the ride, but the Mazda is more a drivers car with comparable or better interior.
What color is your signature?
I've never understood SUVs and crossovers that drive more like cars. The compromise makes sense in my head, but every time drive something like that it just makes me wish i was driving something thats actually sporty
Id normally agree but this IS ACTUALLY fun to drive. I’d argue it is just as fun as the Mazda3.
@@RealistickI trust your judgement. To be clear I think the compromise is well worth it which is why I own a crossover. I had a manual 91' 325ix and with sticky tires the manual all wheel drive was so fun to throw around corners. Now I resent everything that reminds me that I sold it.
Very timely video for me. I'm looking at a CX-5 after 7 awesome, trouble free years with my Mazda 3. But, the CR-V hybrid is pretty intriguing. Even though I don't drive a ton of miles, the efficiency of the Honda is tempting. But the Mazda will be immediately familiar in the interior and driving dynamics and build quality. Tough decision!
Definitely try them both, the CR-V hybrid was surprisingly good (even in the handling and quality department), I'm curious what you would think of it after owning a mazda3!
In a nearly identical boat (looking to retire my 2012 Mazda3), comparing the CX-5, 50, and hybrid accord (it’s my wildcard). Didn’t test drive a hybrid CR-V, but I was very impressed with the Hybrid Accord.
Love the fuel economy of the hybrid, but it’s honestly hard to beat the features and price that even a cx-5 carbon offers.
I tested the CRV hybrid today. Very impressive vehicle: nice quality interior, comfortable ride with decent handling. My only concerns were the cabin noise on the freeway and the tepid acceleration. My mazda3 has been one of my favorite cars. I didn't think I'd own it this long but it really grew on me. Fun and much zippier than the CRV. But I want a larger car with all wheel drive for skiing and safety. I'll try the CX-5 soon!
@@Realistick
@@paulbenoit9431 I have a 2024 CRV Sport-L and I think the noise comes from the oem tires.
The CR-V hybrid is overpriced. You’ll never get that money back unless you drive a ton. The CX-5 is my choice.
Mazda confirmed that a refresh is in the works for the 2026 model year, not a lot of details but a hybrid option will be added to the line up, in this case sourced from Toyota, basically the same set up as the RAV 4 Hybrid. The NA and Turbo options would remain.
Call me crazy, but "oldest in it's class" is an upside for me. The drivetrain is tried and true, (even in turbo form) and frequently used functions are still buttons and switches. I also vastly prefer the old school hooded instrument binnacle vs the one giant tablet look for both the instruments and center infotainment that most cars released the past 3 years or so seem to have. Also if we're comparing it to it's slightly smaller cousin (CX-50) or the much smaller CX-30, it still has Mazda's multi-link independent rear suspension. That may not make any difference to most buyers, and admittedly Mazda does a great job tuning their torsion beam...but I still like the idea of each rear wheel being able to move independently of each other. Of course on something like the CX-5 that comes fairly stiffly sprung from the factory (vs some competitors) it may not make much difference in the ride comfort, but it does help to improve handling feel. The interior no longer has the "wow" factor it did when it was first released (2017?) but still looks great to my eyes..and certainly still better looking than RAV4 or CRV interiors. Of course some of that comes at the cost of form over function, but for me Mazda found an acceptable balance between the two.
The 2024 GX in Canada is getting a recall on the screen/mic? Basically our 2024 cx-5 Gx has issues with an echo for the person you're talking to over the phone... The dealership said that Mazda is planning a recall. Additionally, one thing I found off with this car is the steering... I find that I have to constantly correct it whilst driving unlike the steering on my Toyota Carolla hatchback. Kind of weird to drive on the highway lol.
I hope the cx70 fixes all the powertrain issues with the cx90.
Is the CX90 having problems?
@@ColdShift one of the biggest complaints of the CX-90 is the transmission
She is a little wacky at low speeds, hopefully a retune could fix it but the wet clutch was an interesting decision…
There are several TSBs on the CX90 and it shifts butter smooth now .
For those who can't stand that Mazda has ambitious design and are best in class something will always be wrong so little issues or non issues will be presented as big deal 😉
I laugh at it and get better deal at my next Mazda while Honda Subbie or Nissans that are far inferior are crowding parking lots and offer no deals ...😉
@@kdomster9141 I attended a mazda test drive event for the cx90 so they were early production models. It's good to hear they're better. Savagegeese test drove recent press cars and they seem to still have issues
So Mazda is ditching the CX-5 in the future for the CX-50?
As the owner of both a six-speed 2010 Mazda3 sedan (for a little while longer) and a 2024 CX-5 Signature, I truly understand how well you grok Mazda's design philosophy. I don't think there's a single thing in this video that I disagree with. I didn't want a 900 lb weight increase over my 3 or a slushbox, but since my knees demanded it, the CX-5 does a good job of delivering driving pleasure in a class that's nearly devoid of it. Otherwise, I would've saved gas over the long haul and gotten a CR-V.
Is the base engine powerful enough? I can lease the CX-5 2.5 Premium for $385/month, and the turbo for just $38/month more - $423/month.
PS: I do a lot of highway driving.
Does carbon edition mean your engine already has carbon in it?
Mazda CX-5 has something called "Lane-keep Assist" and it is very limited. It is available on all trims. It works ABOVE 40 mph, not below.
The vehicle DOES NOT have a real lane centering system on any trim.
I'm not fond of cylinder deactivation (CD) nor the i-Stop; I understand their benefits but I feel these two features will reduce engine reliability long term.
In 2023 I test drove the CX-5 Turbo against the Outback XT. Here are things I didn’t like about the CX-5:
- The high belt line affected my ability to see the drivers’ faces in the cars beside me on the passenger side. I ride a motorbike too, so I rely on being able to see drivers’ faces help me predict their manouvering intentions for my safety. Disagreeing with Tyler, all-round visibility wasn’t great.
- The driver’s seat squab was too short. So I felt discomfort under my thighs after about an hour on the road (I’m 6’ tall).
- The car only comes with a space saver wheel, not full size.
I ended up buying the Outback XT, which solved all of the above issues (all Outbacks sold in Australia come with a full size spare) but there are a few niggles:
- I find the throttle difficult to modulate in the economy “i” mode. It’s much better in “s” mode. I suspect that this is due to the engine preferring to cruise at very low RPMs in “i” mode, but the turbo engine is a bit gutless there, so the CVT needs to “down shift” to accelerate. The CX-5 Turbo’s transmission is much more intuitive and fun.
- The length of the car and height of the bonnet / hood takes getting used to, particularly in tight parking garages.
- The steering rack is a bit slow, and requires a “reach over” grab of the steering wheel on 90-degree turns. I was spoilt with a fast rack in my previous Golf GTI. This slow-ish steering rack discourages enthusiastic driving a bit. The CX-5 rack definitely felt faster, and together with the peppy turbo engine and torque converter transmission would make a more fun drive for sure.
Every choice is a compromise.
gen1 is more rugged, bigger (more cargo), non-turbo if lighter/faster, higher off the ground and IMO better looking car.
Hello, i am not able to decided which model to buy between CX 5 or CX 50 and reliability is one of the main point which is confusing me.
Does being assembled in Alabama make CX 50 less reliable than Japanese assembled CX 5?
Please reply with your suggestions.
Thanks in advance
Probably won’t matter at all. I usually find that cars built in japan from Japanese brands have great build quality (not always) but the CX-5 hasn’t really been noticeably more or less reliable than other cars from the brand. Go with what your heart desires!
I own both and the CX5 is better in every way. The cx50 is overpriced for what you get for the money.
@@Realistick thanks for the advice.
Booked a cx 50 today.
Your videos about it really helped
Weirdly, I liked it better with the unpainted fender trim.
Best looking SUV then again it is saying pretty much all Mazdas! Zoom Zoom
Still the best suv ❤cx5
i really hope they do a redesign in 2025. The cx 5 is oldddd
After owning a CX7 for 13 years and 203k miles, I did buy a CX5 preferred this year. I wanted a naturally aspirated engine, a non-CVT transmission, better Bluetooth for being able to talk on the phone hands-free, and a non-hybrid. What I don't like is the following, The non-Bose system is just OK, not nearly enough bass for me and I miss the CD player. The console armrest is too far back to be really comfortable for me. I despise the Istop, and although there is a button to turn it off, I usually forget to disengage it at least once a day. Not a fan of rain-sensing wipers, if you have freezing rain/ice overnight and have them on they will automatically activate when it is not good to do so. I also do not need AWD, I wish there was still an option for FWD. Overall, it is still a fun, zippy SUV which I think has the best in class exterior. Time will tell if it has staying power....
"Just like trail mix with mostly M&M's...."
Paint chips very easily.
I bought one. I liked the Honda CRV too but it has a few MASSIVE shortcoming. CVT, goofy hybrid system that saves 0 gas. Horrible stereo. The Honda was more comfortable. I actually could probably live with the CVT but the goofy hybrid and bad stereo coming in at a higher price? No way Honda. No way.
but the CRV has a CVT. YUCK!
A half-assed off-road trim would be great. I would pay extra for a softer ride and a bit more ground clearance.
Id probably just get a cx-50 at that point!
@@RealistickThe wider lower version should be the sport model. How did Mazda get this backwards?
👍🏻. This like and comment has no commercial value. It does not offer any opinion, ideas or insight. It is solely intended to manipulate the algorithms on CZcams for the channel in which the comment was intended to support.
Much obliged
You mean Toyota, the recall king? We recently had a Rav4 as a rental when our CX-3 was in the shop (due to an accident). What a boring turd of a vehicle. Very low rent interior. We were both extremely unimpressed with it. I would take the CR-V over it anyday. In fact, I would get a Trailblazer or Encore GX over the Rav4.
Most importantly CX5s are made in Japan😊
2024 CX-5s do not ALL have “painted fenders” (by which he actually means painted cladding… obviously they all have painted fenders, duh!). Case-in-point… the non-turbo Carbon Edition has flat black cladding still. Sorry, but this is just lazy researching. 🙄
A fender is just the panel or area around the wheel wells. I only call it cladding if it’s unpainted but I can see your pov. Already pinned a comment 5 months ago about the cladding. There’s a ton of research that goes into each video, on occasion, I’ll get a small nuance wrong, correct myself, and move on. The goal is to eliminate that altogether but I’m not perfect… yet🥸
@@RealistickMy apologies for the snarkiness of my comment.😞 Sorry. I’d been researching the CX-5 and watching tons of vids on it and so many were error-ridden that I think I’d jut reached a saturation point… but the tone of my comment was uncalled for. I do genuinely like your reviews (and style of review) and I appreciate the amount of effort you put into to them. Again, my apologies.
@@1allspub No worries, thank you, have a nice weekend!
ARE touches, not "is" as in "there's". Grammar is important.
It happens, I try to catch things while editing because I hardly write these beforehand. Grammar is important to look professional so I try to get better at it but if that’s all I missed while talking off the dome then I’m honestly pretty happy with myself! (Hopefully my subconscious will hear it next time)
@@Realistick Congratulations, good response...a sign of maturity. I'll watch more of your videos now, not only for the information but also for...well, you know.
Looks weird/bloated with body matching painted cladding. Should have done them all in black or dark gray painted cladding/trim, & also done that awful chrome front grill trim the same way. I do like the CX-5 though - best in its price+size class still IMO.
no indicatores no like
At 0:50 to 1:03 you get right into prices. What currency? USD? Cdn? australia? Where are you? Biggest fail of car reviewers. Turns me off immediately.
USD, I sometimes forget to include that, I'll drop it into my template so thanks for the reminder but if that's the biggest fail of car reviewers then idk whether I'm flattered or disappointed lmao
I must be the only person in the world who thinks this car's interiors SOOO boring. Every reviewer on YT says how luxurious it is...Apart from a few leather surfaces, I find it boring as heck. Even the hashboard display looks like a cheap kindle table stuck on as an afterthought. A horrible design that many others are doing also, instead of a nice integrated display like in the new Subarus
Can someone explain what just happened?
Wow If you don’t know now you
Know