Tests Show Most Automatic Braking Systems Don’t Work With Pedestrians
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 10. 2019
- Every 88 minutes in the U.S. another pedestrian is killed in a traffic accident. Safety advocates are excited about technology that can help prevent such crashes but new testing indicates it could be a long road.
Adult crossing the street
Automatic braking system: stop
Child crossing the street
Automatic braking system: full send
Is the automatic braking system fully sending its task of braking or it WON'T perform its task of braking?
I feel like the last line should say, "Automatic braking system: Ight imma head out"
@@JustDoMeCrew no the auto brake instead accelerates the car when it sees a child, they're a threat and must be assimilated
Sees child: lemme just floor it real quick
That shi is natural selection
The child was later identified as a prolific car thief.
“The results are worse at night”
*accidentally hits an actual person*
The less pedestrians there are, the better it is
Mission Failed Successfully
“Accidentally”
To be fair pedestrians at night seem like they want to be hit. They always seem to always be dressed in all black non reflective clothing. I had a guy wearing all black riding an all black bicycle dart in front of me and the only reason I slammed on the brake was because of the single red reflector on the front of his bike.
lol
expert: the car fails to detect pedestrians 90% of the cases
car: actually detects the pedestrians but chooses to ignore them
car: Damn I can never hit that last guy.
F***ing Skynet..
*no witnesses*
"EVERY TIME a car (auto stop car) turned a corner, it hit the pedestrian."
That's a 100% failure rate. Humans surely can do much better than that in avoid hitting pedestrians around the corner. The auto industry that touts the auto-stop feature as a life saving device may be causing more injuries and deaths inadvertently in such a scenario by causing auto stop car drivers to be less cautious when turning around a corner.
Ultron: “what is the mission?”
- You don't have to look to cross the street, son. We are in the future!
- Ok mom!
0:37
the perfect murder
😂😂😂😂😂
That Camry said “fuck yo son!” 👦🏻💥🚙💨
@@Donniedrako lol
There is a literal example of a mom teaching her child this at 1:38
1:14
The suv was like “I don’t want to kill him, but I wanna give that little shit something to remember me by”
LMAO
Taking a honda logo to the ass. p a i n
Nah it just wanted a hug
Lul
Lmao 😂
You’re not supposed to depend on those features anyway.
Tesla claims you can. Million robotaxis by the end of the year.
@@NONcomD You can. The only car you can see that had to SHARPLY TURN A CORNER before hitting the dummy was a Tesla. They literally put the aptest vehicle against the most difficult test. At that point, the person you hit is at fault because they didn't look both ways before walking into a roadway and the car didn't know it was being tested.
@@MercyPrevails tesla apologists everywhere you look.
@@MercyPrevails what about the one where it didn't turn and still ran someone over?
I agree @Rob RenTerra
I shouldn't be laughing this is a serious issue
Dummy: Explodes
Lmao
It's not an issue at all. It's just a system that can help the driver, not replace them. If it just saves one life when a driver wasn't paying attention, it's still better to have than not.
@@EragoEntertainment It could be an issue if people don't know that it isn't fully reliable and, Go drive while sleeping, cause I've seen videos of people driving autopilot cars asleep.
@@MsChestnutter1 In this case it's just break assistants. Also it's very well communicated that no car is fully autonomous, these people are just assholes and would have had accidents anyway.
People that dive in crowded streets in third world countries: Pathetic
an Egyptian taxi driver would never hit a pedestrian
@@grzyruth9205 yo those fuckers drive at light speed and barely hit anything.
are you dumb? most of that accidents are from the rich countries!
we in the 3rd world knows how to cross the streets.
you people dont, thats why you need that kind of technologies.
why do you need that kind of technology?
its simple: if youre the driver, be attentive
and if youre a pedestrian just look to your F*CKING left and right before crossing! idiots!
@@lmangayaay all these flavours and you chose to be salty
@@lmangayaay lol are u serious. the amount of times i've been to third world countries and see someone laying on the street dying from being hit by a car but nobody does anything cause they can't is sad. the only fact you hear about this in first world countries is because they actually get reported. in third world countries nobody cares to report these issues.
You know how when you’re a kid, and they teach you to look left and right before crossing. Just do that!
And please, PLEASE dont jaywalk, you can literaly get paralyzed...
A lot of people don’t yield when turning left, can’t blame the pedestrian in that case either
Ong
People don't look left and right anymore. They believe they're the only ones in this world and cars have to stop for them automatically. Just go to the San Francisco area and you'll see what I mean.
@@chente8318 I agree although there are a select few places in the US where pedestrians don’t have to look at all. In Gatlinburg, TN, in the one mile stretch of downtown, it is a very serious violation to not yield to pedestrians. And possibly even jail time. Considering it is next to the smoky mountains, you can see why.
Me: *"slow down, there's a kid up ahead"*
Car: *...So anyway*
@Nathan Gonzalez
Ya not funny at all.
@@xBloodXGusherx Says you
@Nathan Gonzalez
I wish I knew where you lived.
"Oh no!
anyway..."
@Nathan Gonzalez
I will find out soon Nathan.
0:48 LMAO I thought he was gonna say "it hit them both of them"
it swerved to hit them
this made me giggle
Me: Why didn't you stop??
Car: He deserved it.
Back in my day, we could take a 20 mph impact and still limp uphill both ways through the snow to school.
Bullshit
20mph is kinda slow tbh.
@@clienty1227 you missed the joke
@@honorable_aj7280 just give him some time, he’s Delayed
Bullshit, you know as well as I do, that after we take a 20mph impact, we would limp to the driver’s side, pull them out and beat their ass, in the snow, then limp to school uphill
The CR-V was like.... “ahhh let me hit him” 😂
G Castillo yeah the Honda’s are like I like blood and hitting people the Honda’s didn’t even try to slow down.
@@breenseaturtlegaming9990 😂😂
the vtec was kicking in
@@breenseaturtlegaming9990 He likes blood. it's his not his meal a lot.
This could be the next "Mustang"
"It's not reliable".
Ah, so it's pretty much like most drivers.
Lmao such underrated comment.
1:13 I'm dying it slowed down, ran him over then stopped😂😂😂
LOOOOL 😂😂😂LOOOOL 😂😂😂LOOOOL 😂😂😂LOOOOL 😂😂😂
Well, of course; you don't want to kill the guy, but sometimes you gotta give him a little love tap so he learns to get his dumb ass out of the street! XD
@@egarcia1360 Jajaja totalmente...
😂😂😂
@@egarcia1360 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
AI: "That doesn't look like human" - Slam the
accelerator
human detected. Full speed ahead!*
@@3wGaming Because safety first. Never risk the driver live over those poor (Literally poor, not rich) human.
Zuckerberg better not be crossing streets then
Suddenly the suv transformed into a Chiron
Fr fr
1:15 Just fast enough to teach them a lesson, lmao.
Lmao
They got spanked lol
Tag!!! Your it.
Lol right just make that the standard
_"That's what you get for standing in the middle of the road like the moron that you are"_
car hits a pedestrian :
car:
"oh no, anyways"
2030 Drivers: Not my fault. the car didn't stop automatically.
How are the cops going to bring revenue for government and insurance companies, in that case??
@@rkt81 sell your car that was impounded.
@Jay Rozes Cars already record brake applications, it's easy to tell what was happening seconds before and during a crash. Look at Tiger Wood's latest "accident" it will only get easier to forensically dissect pre accident computer inputs. Unless the car burns that is.
Haha, blurring out the emblems as if we can't tell what cars they are.
Honda and Toyota fails
@@barrya.6212 its a toyota camry and the new Accord, easy to tell
Even Tesla fails
Car guys be like: lol your pesky little blurry emblems are nothing compared to our mind dictionary of every car on earth
Toyota crap
“The biggest thing that we’ve uncovered with these scenarios is that people should look both ways before they cross the street”
Kids are dumb and don't know much better, cuz they're dumb...
Saftey systems give false senses of security, in situations, where drivers need to still be vigalent
Nah that makes to much sense bro
@@Bee-tj8gc same as seat belts when they were first introduced accidents went up not down, becuase drivers thought seat belts made them safe so they drove more dangerously until people got used to having them. Doesn't mean we should go backwards and not have them...or this either.
You're asking a lot of a society that thought it was a good idea to put a failed, reality TV show host as president.
@@AdonisGaming93 true, companies need to be more honest though or test more.
thers too many videos of people eating and sleeping behind these self driving cars.
For pedestrians : Look both ways, never DEPEND on such technology!
For drivers : if driving is a chore to the point you use your phone while driving, DON'T drive, this is the one chore you can choose to not do! I heard someone say they laughed when a driving instructor said a car key is the most dangerous thing in your pocket...yeah...
Agreed. Don't rely on auto brake. Its the absolute last resort. Don't. You shouldn't rely on autobrake at all in all circumstances, and always treat yr car for not having one, even when it does. If you can't do that, you shouldn't sit behind the wheel at all.
Also, for the tests, some were quite biased towards autobraking. I asked myself that if I'm in some of the extreme conditions will I able to slam on the brakes in time at all. If you're not able to do it, and the autobrake have an effectiveness of 10 percent, that's 10 percent chances the car will be stopped for the pedestrian.
life hack: "don't walk in front of cars"
I mean it's a privilege to drive, you get license to drive but you don't get license to walk in any road. So it's always people first
@@Cutecumball *yeah, but if you're walking at least have the common sense of looking on both directions before crossing.*
Reporter: "This car failed to detect a child walking onto the street"
Me: *dies of laughter as the kid gets absolutely destroyed*
I actually hit a kid back in October at night going around 40. Was scared shitless as it happened and progressed but the kid was fine and walked away with some scrapes and a broken toe even though I flipped him on the side of my car as I braked. I laugh about it today and also seeing that part too because it reminds me of the kid. He actually wished me a speedy mental recovery after hitting him. LOL Freaking kid.
@@enriquevalencia678 I once drove up the street that leads to my house, when two small children on bikes came around a corner driving dead centre on the road they were so scared that they ended up crashing into each other as they tried to reach the sidewalk. I was going pretty slow so nothing happened but I just sat in my car laughing cause the way the looked at each other after crashing was just priceless. The Only thing that worried me was that they were headed in the direction of a 50km/h street and obviously had no awareness about traffic. Hope they made it.
@@enriquevalencia678 ok what
@@Jerererere I hit a kid in October because he ran in the middle of the street for his ball. It was dark and the kid was coming from a hill. He went to the hospital but was discharged that same night with a broken toe and some road rash. Kid was cool about it. He was like 13 or 14.
@John Dunham not every american is a crybaby loser like the media makes you think
Why don't you see us??
AI: "Who said we don't see you?"
Skynet isn’t hiding their intentions...you cross in front of them, and they cross you off this earth!
a day will come when cars will accelerate upon sight of human on the road
theirs a study that reads "black people are more likely to be hit by a automatic driver that whites" or something like that
Oh sh*t
@@kittenwithmittens6200 well being darker makes you , u know, harder to see in the dark
0:24 "how well do these systems work in real world situations?"
Well... it would make carjacking someone infinitely easier.......
redundancy is going to be key, its why elevators are so safe.
I agree, if our original body gets wrecked we could have another one ready to replace it. Redundant bodies are going to be key.
Elevators are safe because of their failsafe, it can only go up or down when the brake is energized OFF. Otherwise springs hold the brake on at all times, there's no redundancy whatsoever. Commercial jets have 2 and 3x redundant systems and they still go down, your comment is senseless and so are the 28 people that mindlessly agreed with such a flawed statement. If that seemed redundant I just wanted to make sure it was understood, lol.
@@jimmartin7881 I was quoting a documentary I saw like 4 years ago on elevators. Apparently there is some math statistic that says elevators shouldn’t be as safe as they actually are. It’s because of just how many redundant fail safes there are. The creator of very early elevators had someone hack at the cables with a fireman’s axe of an elevator he was standing in and it didn’t go down even without one of the major cables holding him up.
I just didn’t bother writing a full comment 3 months ago. No biggie for me, but apparently enough for you to have me make myself more clear.
@@Van-Leo No prob, there's a counterweight on a cable that balances things and a spring brake that's always on. Unless someone got in the shaft and torched the cables it's nearly impossible for an elevator car to fall.
Pedestrian: *crosses street*
AI: “ so you have chosen death “
Skynet likes this system
Lol
the person driving the car: doing something else. who knows what.
These systems are likely not AI driven. Just sensors that brake when it detects something ahead.
*AI floors it *
This is how I like getting my kills in COD warzone.
This is how Salman Khan gets his kills in Real Life. 😂😂
🤣
🤣😂😂😂
Because of Players like you i deleted this Game
I started that in the loading lobby. Now everyone is doing it
Adult crossing the street
Ai: Damn... brake brake brake
Kid crossing the street
Ai: Ahh...thank god it's just a little one
IKR? 'cause some speed bumps are more effective than others 😄
“And when there were two pedestrians on the road, it hit one and proceeded to backup to make sure the witnesses were taken care of as well.”
I believe the purpose of this technology is to avoid lawsuits by leaving no witnesses. Effectively the same thing as having had no accident at all.
I like the part where the dummy was like:
🚘🚶🏻
🤣🤣🤣😭
They were like "Hit me please! Hit me harder!"
@@annatsukiya LAMAJSJS
And then 🧑🏼🦽 🚘
@@annatsukiya woah. *cough cough* I mean... if you ask for it ;)
My only concern is that it should be an *"extra help",* but people thinks that's a substitute of the driver's own attention.
So they can keep looking at the smartphone while driving.
exactly this is driving me fucking nuts, people expect to be spoon fed safety when we have eyes and brains to use, no car would have to worry about braking too hard really quick unless the pedestrian fails to check both directions before crossing which is literally the easiest and first thing we learn when we're 5
if they still manage to forget it then I sure hope natural selection takes place
@@Koltary acting like it isn't also the driver's fault for not stopping. The operator of the vehicle should just as much attentive as the pedestrian
I agree with everyone in this comment and it's replies
it's extra junk.
@@drippeeboye607 If you are driving even 35 mph with your foot on the brake, you won't be able to always stop before hitting someone that steps out into traffic... None of these scenarios in the video would've been the drivers fault legally.
Remove all of the special safety tech, and then send someone to driver’s school again whenever they hit someone.
No, also design safer streets.
NotJustBikes has some great videos related to the topic, like this one:
czcams.com/video/Ra_0DgnJ1uQ/video.html
@@rogerwilco2 Ah yes, because the vast majority of streets in existence weren't designed decades ago and wouldn't cost billions to replace
@@ifb6368 welp... It's not like Dutch cities weren't designed years ago either, most of their change in infrastructure is fairly recent.
No more seatbelts, wooohoo!
Sounds like it’s the pedestrian’s auto-don’t-cross-the-road-when-there-are-cars-coming system that are at fault rather than the car’s.
Yeah but don't blame the victims. Children are likely to cross the street without looking both ways. These systems might even save dogs as well.
@@imyourmaster77 adult does it more
@@imyourmaster77 maybe tell their parents to install the auto-look-both-ways-and-only-cross-when-it-is-safe. If this system malfunctions, they can use the auto-you-are-grounded tool to fix the child.
@@imyourmaster77 If you're not training your children to look both ways before crossing the street, then you shouldn't be a parent. I grew up in a house where my driveway led out onto a road that had a 55 MPH speed limit, but most people went 65 MPH. Guess what? I'm alive today thanks to good parenting.
What we need to do is pass a law that states that anytime a child gets hit by a car, the parents are immediately arrested, and a court looks into whether the children should be taken away from the parents due to them being irresponsible parents.
Moral of the story: Don't run out into traffic.
That will not be possible for future generations using their VR goggles to get attention on TikTok.
@61 Cygni not gonna lie, that shit cut deep.
Moral of the story: Don't trust A.I.
No, design safer streets.
NotJustBikes has some great videos related to this topic.
For example: czcams.com/video/Ra_0DgnJ1uQ/video.html
@@rogerwilco2 Great link, but I'm wondering if this would curtail robot cars going the speed limit from hitting pedestrians running into traffic.
Child: Crosses the Street
Automatic braking cars : And i took that Personally
Kid: Goes through road. Cars AI: So I took that personally.
the way it cuts at the end of the video is hilarious 😂
this is a last resort, not an incentive not to use your brakes
Yeah, but it makes a great clickbait headline
@@simpleinverso8628 I mean, it isn't clickbait because it said most Automatic Braking Systems
@@themanguy2110 but at the end it confused people
When that stupid lady is looking at the phone
So, because it's a last resort, it shouldn't have to work?
I enjoy the fact that the CR-V stopped, thought about it, then hit the crash test dummy anyways @1:14. I made an excellent choice of vehicle!
It was like get out of the road dipshit.
Now that's an AI I can get behind!
...
..
Though rather not in front I guess
That was funny. But it did that as a reflex tp avoid the car behind it hit him
AI Road rage at pedestrians!!
This reminds me of a time that I was in the backseat, and all of a sudden the automatic braking systems turned on for no reason, and all of the pop corn and doughnuts we had in the car flew everywhere.
Imagine if the sensor was too sensative and you just keep braking on the highway wenever a bird or fox goes across
killer trees?
Thanks for covering cars logo, we didn’t know cars brand.
I know! I thought it was a Ferrari because the badge wouldn’t show.
It’s totally a Tesla, no doubt!!!
Tesla and ford
Tell me someone who doesnt know these car brands Honda And Toyota I mean who doesnt know them
Ikr like a Tesla isn’t the most recognizable car out there
"Safety advocates" boring. I want to hear their opposition, "Un-safety advocates".
This made me laugh 🤣 more than needed I just imagined like a squidward voice for this being said
I'll speak up... with all the rioters pulling innocent people out of their cars lately, I'll take a Dodge Challenger with none of this tech, thanks!!!
So GM's team of lawyers, right?
yolo
It's called "natural selection"
Plot twist: this new AI knows EXACTLY what it is doing....👁
smaller cars have the sensor lower to the ground, SUVs have it in a higher position, which is better to detect obstacles.
There’s a funny animation from cyanide and happiness where a girl is being chased by a murderer and she gets in her car and tries to kill him but the car automatically breaks and she gets killed
Lmaooo
Omg what's the name of the vid?
what
czcams.com/video/1EMqd5Nznv0/video.html
Automatic braking is something we can live without, and so many people will be pulled from their cars and beaten to death in riots when yeeting it through the crowd to escape is no longer an option.
these cars really said "maaannn fuck dim kids bro"
@Jonathan Bergman u known kid are not that smart
@CallMeCarson Plus Fan u havent seen pakistan
@Jonathan Bergman average citizen cars weight is between 900 kg - 1400 kg. 🚗
@Jonathan Bergman 👁️👄👁️
natural selection
i like how they blurred the cars' badges in some scenes but you can still clearly see what company theyre from
Imagine a police chase in the future just an office throwing himself in-front the car waiting for the sensors to stop the dashers car 😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Bro that’s actually really smart
Same scenario only it's not a cop it's someone who wants to kill, rob, or kidnap you....
@@82fire28 damm. U just fkd my mind.
@@nibzy7149 Sorry, not a fan of the tech due to those reasons and more.
Red: Honda
Blue: Toyota
Black: Tesla
White: Toyota
Light Grey: Subaru
Dark grey: BMW
Thanks for Blurring out the emblems lmao
The white one is a Chevy
@@JKinch_ LMAO
gotta love how they used tesla footage only and in the only place where it fails 100%.
@@mahamudra911 ikr
@@rayyanriaz1689 no it isnt
I love the dramatic effect the dummy's legs flying everywhere
I remember when I was a kid, they had this awesome safety system called: COMMON SENSE!! It worked 100% of the time. It consisted of each person taking responsibility for their own wellbeing so pedestrians would look both sides before crossing and not gamble with cars, drivers would drive slower the closer they were to possible pedestrians... I often wonder why did we de-evolve.
*Child walks infront*
Car with Emergency Braking System: yeet
These systems are just for assist, not to depend on
“Assist” he says while dumbass comment sections insist these cars will be fully autonomous
@@KiLLJoYCZcams He's probably come from 2070
@Harve Seks by the time they will be to depend on, they will be much much better than humans.
There comes a point where we're just enabling human stupidity.
Right
Plot twist: the car knows only dummies cross the street without looking. LoL
"Hits them 80% of the time" Still 20% saved. You’re not supposed to depend on these features ;P.
@John John Exact
We should still try to get that number to 99% for the future so we can eventually have self driving cars
@@deathtrooper2048 "Tesla" "Are we a joke to you?"
@@DatIsEchtGamen Actually ya, kinda, i would not trust their tech knowing what i do about the the BS going on with the firmware/hardware. I'll wait.
Who would rely on those features anyway? Who would see a pedestrian and think "oh I don't have to brake I have the automatic braking system". Noone... Thats just stupid
Mercedes said ones that some testers fail at setting the test up in the first place. They made the test with a real person. The car was driving at around 30mph and it has braked every time. If all the cars fail than you might have to revise your test. The Euroncap ( the European crash test) tested them and they work on most cars flawlessly even at night.
or the test with low success rates was just a more difficult test. you can never be too safe when it comes to testing.
@@FunMan125 If the dummies are made of hollow plastics it might not give the same signature on the sensors as an actual human body.
Yeah because any sane logical person would volunteer to test a braking system that might easily kill him. makes total sense
@@mohamedprince2722 That's why car manufacturers and testers invented crash test dummies. Those are "dolls" that perfectly reproduce all physical characteristics of actual humans and can survive thousands of crashes.
In this video they use shitty hollow plastic silhouettes. Sensors calibrated for detecting dense flesh won't trigger with hollow figures.
NEVER take a corporation words at face value. Of course they would deny that their products are not safe.
@Imbued Beards wrote:
“The biggest thing that we’ve uncovered with these scenarios is that people should look both ways before they cross the street”
No, you can't blame the victim whether it's a child, someones pet or someone with a mental or physical impairment. DRIVERS need to be more responsible in the way they drive which means DEFENSIVE driving. Most of the drivers who exceed the speed limit, or change lanes without signaling to others around them and quickly or are distracted by whatever they may be doing while driving are the real problem. A lot of drivers can't even see some of the vehicles around them let alone a motorcyclist or bicyclist so you know they likely wouldn't be anticipating some kid running from between cars and so slowing down and maybe even having their foot over the brake just in case.
So always looking around with quick glances is for the drivers. I've learned that the worst drivers think that they're the best because they don't drive defensively.
Our cat, Rascal WOULD LOOK both ways before crossing the street but I was told by our apartment manager on Capital Hill, in Seattle who saw what had happened and rushed our cat to the veterinarian, that as Rascal was crossing E. Thomas street a car traveling north on Summit ave turned the corner just as Rascal was in the street and ran over him.
I would say to any pedestrian especially to those who have never driven a vehicle to look both ways before crossing the street. This same scenario applies to drivers, when the light turns green look both ways before crossing the street. One time on First Hill on Boren ave and Madison st a pedestrian almost got hit by a car traveling south on Boren ave because the driver went through a yellow light and the pedestrian thinking that the light would soon change green stepped off the curb and into the street. Also when I drove cab heading up towards the Four Seasons hotel up Union st, I had the green light and a car traveling south on Western ave blew through the red light but I was able to prevent an accident because I was driving defensively.
To those passengers, of drivers who may disagree about defensive driving, you've been warned.
Cars can't stop on a dime, if your stupid enough to walk into traffic you deserve to become roadkill
Ah yes, how dare you walk on your own city, the city is for the car not for you!
@@zweks yes. Roads are for cars sidewalks for pedestrians
I ain’t heard of no boren ave, are you sure this a real story🤔
Remember when your mom used to tell you to look both sides of the street before crossing? I do
Reporter: washingt.......
Tesla: obliterates ped dummy.
Lmao
There's an easier way to prevent such accidents:
*Look both ways before crossing*
I don't know how it is in your country but in France the pedestrian has the priority. Of course we look both ways before crossing but it is the driver who needs to stop.
Even if I don't check both sides before crossing if a driver hit me it is the driver who is responsible ( as long as i am crossing in a pedestrian crossing of course). A good driver should be able to stop at any pedestrian crossing at anytime
@@batardbreton7083 That is just about a "responsibility" for accidents. Easier way to reduce accidents is not changed. Driver should obey rules and also pedestrians should obey rules.
@@daiaki1975 Yeah but my point was that there is no rule telling pedestrian have to check both sides before crossing (it is juste a strong advice). On the other hand there is a rule telling that a driver should be able to stop at anytime.
But yeah I encourage everyone to check before crossing, bad drivers are everywhere indeed
The comment I first respond to only told the pedestrian to be careful as if the street only belong to drivers
@@batardbreton7083 Fact of the matter still stands, you're a fragile human and the other is a fragile human in a big metal vehicle.
@@knawledgeinc Yeah of course, i am not saying that people should cross without checking. Just that if someone got crashed into at a crossing it is only the driver's fault. All of these accident could be avoided if all drivers respected the rules
I didn't realize kids were built like mr potato head nowadays
is it just me or is it really funny when the dolls limbs go flying
0:38 That's one way to end childs support
You can't forget that the majority of these systems primarily intend on softening the impact in conjunction with preventing it.
We aren't supposed to rely on these systems, why are people unhappy!?
@@tomsterbg8130 yeah, its like when people were testing for motorbike helmets and found out that they don't prevent injuries 100%, so people chose not to use them until they were mandated. Generally egotists claiming "real men don't wear helmets". They do everything in their capacity to satisfy their ego.
@@ritwikreddy5670 I've never understood this idiotic thinking method, where something has to be utterly perfect before it's accepted. I mean, we can improve in increments people! It's still an improvement!
@@MrVelociraptor75 helmets get real fucking hot
@@thatjokerperson7062 That is an utterly useless "excuse" for refusing to wear a helmet. But, you do you.
Frankly, I think you should spend a bit more on your helmet, by the sounds of it. Either cheap or expensive helmets will save your life just as well, but more expensive helmets are (typically) more comfortable. Get one designed for cooling
I mean, I am frankly surprised they work even 10 - 20% of the time. I've always thought of this as just technology in that stage of development that its really just a novelty but won't have practical use for at least another couple of decades.
The thing is that from the manufacturer's perspective, it is much worse to have a false positive than a false negative.
tesla was like - ehh u trying to prank me
* LUDICROUS MODE *
My mom be like: When I was a kid and got ran over by a car, I just kept driving
This comment hurt my brain
Which is it is she walking or driving bro Make up your mind
I work in the claims dept and ppl always tell me they have sensors and dont know why it didnt beep and stuff. I’m like thats bc you cant rely on technology and you still need to look.
"Most SUV's were able to stop, or at least slow down." This is soccer mom anti-sedan pro-SUV propaganda and I'm not fucking having it.
I thinks that's only a matter of different heigth of the sensors, on a sedan the windshield is low and therefore the sensor, on an SUV the top of the windshield is significantly higher and so is the sensor, this may have a better capability staying up there... IMHO
@@RidingTusCanY Maybe or manufacturers knows that SUV’s are driven by idiots so those systems are in SUV’s more sensitive.
@@mikulaszimak8840 That's likely the case.
Those aren't SUVs, those are the shitty, inbred offspring of station wagons and mini-vans - Crossovers.
1:15 *ME*
Me when spongebib style
I love how it cuts off at the end
"wait theres a kid crossing the road. WAI-"
*splat*
"The results are worst at night."
No shit sherlocks
You could expect that sensors (infrared, laser, ultrasound, ...) are not sensible to ambiant lighting. So those systems should be as efficient at night as in the day.
@@christianbarnay2499 no.
@@christianbarnay2499 at night cars are drunk
@@Sponge_Bob_Square_Pants or sleepy
I thought these systems depended on RADAR. Only the Lane-keep-assist uses the optical camera. Why wouldn't they work at night?
Anyone else laugh when they legs go flying 😂😂😂
lmao yes
It might be funny that they failed to program this, but I'm not that evil
Hahahaha
the grinch : move! i have no insurance!!!
Even worse in the dark
We didn’t see clearly but looks like you hit a real person as well😂
I’m sorry but the Camry hitting the doll child and making it go flying was so funny 😂
how do you know it was a Camry the logos were blurred it could have been a Chevy or a Kia
@@Nub00005 I know my cars... it looks completely different from a Chevy or a Kia..
How do you not what a camry looks like?@@Nub00005
Title sounds like something straight off of "The Onion"
Reality has overtaking The Onion for a while now.
I clicked expecting the onion lol
Sorry I’m just laughing on how the Test Dummy is walking like how we do in Minecraft lmao
> we
Plot twist the AI is made by Skynet and this is the emergence of Terminator machine intelligence
truly glad to see we haven't completely surpassed natural selection as a species.
0:28 imagine the irony if they got hit by a car right there
I was thinking the same haha
Waiting for the day when someone car jacks me and my car is the accomplice.
1:15 that CR-V's system's judgement and calculation were spot on!
Automatic Braking system before impact: "You're silly if you think i'm not going to send it."
i thought that was a real person & I said ahhhh! His legs went flying! Hehehe
The first time I heard of this I thought it wouldn't work for a child but would stop you on a dime for a squirrel and then you would get rear ended 😅
Al doing the selection for a greater future. No improvement needed.
This just seems like a carjackers best friend.
They know they can step out in front of a car to get it to stop, and then point a gun at the driver.
And in today's America..the driver will be pointing a gun right back.
@@Nightbird. lol the carjacker better hope that vehicle he is about to take stops. Otherwise, they will explode like the dummies in this video.
Tina 😂
The driver can take control over the system and keep going, it will not force you to a complete halt fully against your will.
this is officially the dumbest comment on this video
My forward collision system thinks I’m going to hit the car in front of me as I’m braking. I’ve almost been rear ended several times because of that stupid thing
My girlfriend bought a Honda CRV and we’ve also had similar issue. Sometimes it overreacts a lot in heavy traffic
@Justin Lee I hope you turned it off, cuz of the way you make it out to be, I think it's more of a crash causing feature than a crash preventing one lol 😂
I have my KIA set to early warning and rarely ever get a warning. The only time it's actually activated and braked is when a car in front of me braked extremely hard or a car flew into my lane in front of me. Do you wait till the last second to brake? Also check if you can change the sensitivity, for example, KIA/Hyundai has early, normal, and late.
@@TheOzman99 I have a Hyundai. I brake normally. I’ll check my settings to see if I can turn it off or something because it’s too much.
No kidding. My friend's car hard brake for no reason, scaring the krap out of us. Such shitty half-assed technology should never be released. Glad my relatively new car doesn't have all the kraps. I could drive peacefully knowing I have full control of my car 😎
Now that everyone is looking at touchscreens instead of the road, this tech better get good, fast.
I fail to see how replacing use-by-feel physical controls with non-haptic controls that require you to divert your attention from the road is an improvement!
NEVER LAUGH SO HARD AT A THUMBNAIL!
Am I the only person here who sees this as a terrible idea where the car just stops out of nowhere or the car stops but the thing it stopped for wasn't a human? As a responsible driver who's never hit anyone and never plans to, I would rather not have this than have it.
If any CEO reads this, please please please please in the future have an option to get a car without the technology.
1:42 BMW sytem doesn’t even care lol