Pannonian Avars weren't Mongols but Turks. The Buyla inscription which is the only attested epigraph in their native language was also identified as Oghuric making their Turkic origin a reality in the academic world
The name Mongol appeared first in the eighth-century Chinese records of the Tang dynasty, but only resurfaced in the eleventh century during the rule of the Khitan. At first, it was applied to some small and insignificant nomadic tribes in the area of the Onon River. In the thirteenth century, however, the name Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan. It is not clear what the Mongols called themselves in their own languages. In fact, the specific origin of the Mongolic languages is unclear. Some linguists have proposed a link to languages like Tungusic and Turkic, which are often included alongside Mongolic in a hypothetical language group called “Altaic languages”, but the evidence for this is rather weak.
Mongol was term first used for Mongolic tribes but soon Mongols pushed Turkic people further to the west . Naiman , Kereit are Mongol tribes so you’re mistaken .
😂 You’re just miserable, commenting on every video about Mongolia . Go find a job , instead of writing nonsense . Anatolian Turks are not Turkic genetically but just Anatolian natives who were assimilated by their Turk rulers .
Shimunek, Andrew. "Early Serbi-Mongolic-Tungusic lexical contact: Jurchen numerals from the 室韦 Shirwi (Shih-wei) in North China". Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, Edited by Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky et al. (Leiden: Brill). Retrieved 22 September 2019. quote: "Asdemonstrated by Ratchnevsky (1966: 231), the Shirwi confederation was a multiethnic, multilingual confederation of Tungusic-speaking Mo-ho 靺鞨 people (i.e. ancestors of the Jurchen), the Meng-wa 蒙瓦 ~ Meng-wu 蒙兀, whom Pelliot (1928) and others have shown were Proto-Mongolic speakers, and other groups. The dominant group among the Shirwi undoubtedly were ethnolinguistic descendants of the Serbi (鮮卑 Hsien-pei), and spoke a language closely related to Kitan and more distantly related to Mongolic."
Brilliant video but I have to point out mistakes, you forgot to make Kazakhstan no longer a socialist republic and let Uzbekistan gain some land after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, but overall, I like the video :D
A good history of map development ! but there are still some mistakes. The Mongolian system is more similar to the European feudal dynasty system. Each khanate has a high degree of autonomy, and the same is true for the enfeoffment khanates within their khanate; and, the fact In fact, the Mongolian Empire was united for a period of time after the death of Kublai Qa'an. Strictly speaking, it was not until the disintegration of the Il-khanate in 1335 that the Mongolian Khanates began to gradually abandon the unity of the empire: 13:30-13:48 (1303-1334) Let me start with the place where the autonomy is strong: In reality, within the Mongol empire there existed a number of regional powers at various levels. It is in fact difficult to clearly distinguish which of these powers was a ‘state’ or a ‘regime.’ They formed one system in its entirety. Traditionally, the Mongol empire has been regarded to have ‘dissolved’ into ‘four khanates,’including Dai Yuan Ulus, under the great qa’an. However, in fact, all we can say is, at best,that it was divided into four loose groups. If someone claims that it was ‘dissolved,’one should also count orda Ulus, Ariq Böke Ulus and otchigin Ulus among them. The idea of the ‘division into the four khanates’ seems to be a reflection of a [preconceived] image. 【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.20】 Unity of the empire: Kaidu’s sons and a number of other princes of the houses of Ugedey and Jagatay agreed to recognize Timur’s suzerainty and to settle all future interprincely conflicts by negotia-tion instead of war (1303). This important agreement was supple-mented by making the il-khan of Persia a party to it. Upon the death of the Il-Khan Gazan in 1304 Timur dispatched a grand embassy to Persia to install Gazan’s brother Oljaitu as the new il-khan and to inform him of the pacification of Central Asia. The khan of the Golden Horde, Tokhta, also supported the new agreement. Charac-teristically enough, he in his turn summoned his vassals, the Russian princes, to an assembly in Pereiaslavl, Suzdalia, where his envoy announced the decisions taken by.the leading Mongol rulers.The success of Timur's policy was indeed impressive and the Mongol Empire may be said to have reached the apogee of its power during his reign. All this amounted to a restoration of the unity of the empire in the new form of a pan-Mongol federation presided over by the great khan in Peking. 【Vernadsky, George (1953). The Mongols and Russia, p.82.】 In the Jaghatu valley according to Vaşşâf,that he received the ambassadors of the Great Khan Temür,the grandson and successor (1294-1307) of Qubilai, accompanied by those of Chabar, the son of Qaidu, and Du'a, the son of Baraq: the object of this composite mission was to apprise the Il-Khan of a pact that had put an end to the longstanding quarrels between these branches of the House of Chingiz-Khân. From Marâgheh, where he installed Aşil al-Din, the son of Naşir al-Din Tusi, in the observatory founded by his father, Öljeitü made his way to winter-quarters in Müghân, halting en route at Tabriz to pay a second visit to the Gunbad-i'Âli.In Müghân, on 9 December,he received the ambassadors of Toqta, the ruler of the Golden Horde, who presumably made some allusion to the reconciliation of the princes of Central and Eastern Asia,of which Toqta also had been informed. T o this development, ap parently betokening the restoration of the Mongol world empire as it had existed under Mongke, Oljeitu refers in a letter addressed to Philippe le Bel, which has been preserved in the French national archives. He begins this letter, written at Ativan (Barzand) in Mughan on 5 April 1305, by affirming this desire to maintain the traditional ties of friendship between the Il-Khans and the "sultans of the Frankish people". He then proceeds: " . . . We , Temur Qa'an, Toqta, Chabar,Du'a and others, the descendants of Chingiz-Khan, after recriminating one another for forty-five years down to these recent times, have now,protected by Heaven, all of us, elder and younger brothers, reached a mutual agreement, and from the land of the Chinese, where the sun rises, to the sea of Talu [the Caspian, or perhaps the Mediterranean],our states joining with one another [i.e. re-establishing communi cations],we have caused our post stations to be linked together." 【J.A.Boyle (1968). The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 5: The Saljuq and Mongol Periods, p.399】 The collapse of the unity of the empire: A holistic approach is necessary for several reasons. first of all, the Mongols themselves did not give up the notion of imperial unity until the 1330s and 1340s when regional uluses began to crumble down. for example,up to that time in the entire Mongol world there was only one qa’an or qaghan, and other rulers used the title of khan or qan. They were all well aware that one was the title of supreme sovereignty over the empire and the other was of a subordinate ruler under his authority.This practice was basically unchallenged till 1364, when the empire ended with the collapse of Mongol power in China.so it was not just a symbolic gesture but an institution that continued to exist for more than one and a half century. It was a reflection of the Mongol world order. 【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.19】 😄😄🥰
@@igidi4424 All empires are multi ethnic. But the founding elit class are always one single ethnicity. We cannot call the british colonial empire , a scottish or irish empire for this reason.
@@omerfaruk6082 Still, Xiongnu is predecessor of the Mongols and that is where most of their family tree comes from. But beyond than just that, Mongolian genes are mysterious to the researchers and historians same as Korean and Japanese genes that have mysterious ancestry. I am saying that the most earliest known ancestors of the Mongolians are Xiongnu. I am not saying the leader of Xiongnu (Mete Han) is Mongolian because we never claimed he was.
Correction/오류사항:
1. Laoshang chanyu ruled Xiongnu from 174-161 BCE 라오상* 선우는 흉노를 기원전 174~61년까지 다스렸습니다.
2. Kalmyk Khanate borders are incorrect 칼미크 칸국의 국경이 명확치 않습니다.
3. 일리그 카간 -> 일테리시 카간
In the last part, it is possible to show not only Inner Mongolia but also Buryatia
Very ambitious and hard work. Well done!
That's one way to describe Genghis Khan's conquests
8:04 that Turkic leader smile
Thnx anwooo for making this video downloable on my device!!!
Most underated youtuber ever
Oh, now I know this will be incredible. Thank youuuuuuuuuuuu!
very well done..now I will have to rewatch it multiple times to read the side notes
The Google Doc. web version of lists of thr historical events is in the description.
Pannonian Avars weren't Mongols but Turks. The Buyla inscription which is the only attested epigraph in their native language was also identified as Oghuric making their Turkic origin a reality in the academic world
There were Ughur Turks within the Avar confederation, so it is difficult to ascertain the origin of the Avars.
We can't certainly differ between turks and mongols they are close realted
I think it just shows the most powerful Steppe peoples' empires of the time. It shows some barbarian Chinese dynasties and the Gokturks as noted.
Avars were mongols. According to you everything is Turkic without giving proof 😂😂
@user-ru3nq1ti9t You can tell them apart by DNA
언젠간 내몽골도 또한 '진정한' 몽골인들이 지배하기를 바랍니다.
소위 진정한 몽골인은 한때 러시아인의 꼭두각시였으며 스탈린은 그들에게 키릴 문자로 몽골어를 다시 철자하도록 강요했습니다. 그 기간 동안 내몽골만이 전통적인 몽골어 문자를 유지했습니다.
@@Adolph_shampoo 그래서 지금 내몽골 사람들이 몽골어를 쓰나요, 중국어를 쓰나요?
몽골글을 쓰나요, 한자를쓰나요?
내몽골이 소위 몽골민족을 위한 자치기구라면 과거 문화대혁명과 내몽골 인민혁명당 숙청사건 때 학살당한 몽골인들은 어떻게 설명하실건가요?
@@user-eo5sg7rp4d 내몽고 자치구 인구의 70%가 몽골인이 아니다. 민족의 독립을 원한다면 그 70%의 인구를 학살해야 하는가? 최근 이스라엘-팔레스타인 분쟁을 살펴보세요
@@Adolph_shampoo그게 점령지를 뺐는 방법이지 프랑스도 뉴칼레도니아에 자국민들 밀어넣잖아
The name Mongol appeared first in the eighth-century Chinese records of the Tang dynasty, but only resurfaced in the eleventh century during the rule of the Khitan. At first, it was applied to some small and insignificant nomadic tribes in the area of the Onon River. In the thirteenth century, however, the name Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan. It is not clear what the Mongols called themselves in their own languages. In fact, the specific origin of the Mongolic languages is unclear. Some linguists have proposed a link to languages like Tungusic and Turkic, which are often included alongside Mongolic in a hypothetical language group called “Altaic languages”, but the evidence for this is rather weak.
I see you like everywhere on video about Mongolian history and spreading fake infos 😂
Mongol was term first used for Mongolic tribes but soon Mongols pushed Turkic people further to the west . Naiman , Kereit are Mongol tribes so you’re mistaken .
😂 You’re just miserable, commenting on every video about Mongolia . Go find a job , instead of writing nonsense . Anatolian Turks are not Turkic genetically but just Anatolian natives who were assimilated by their Turk rulers .
Origin of Turkic language is unknown
aww my favorite panturanist back at it again, brother really tries hard under every Mongol-related video
Great video and thx for including the Mughal empire keep up the great work.
Finally!! Really a qualified work
19 min video... Thank you for your dedication
수고하셨습니다
감사합니다!
You're so hardworking🎉
This a great video
Shimunek, Andrew. "Early Serbi-Mongolic-Tungusic lexical contact: Jurchen numerals from the 室韦 Shirwi (Shih-wei) in North China". Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, Edited by Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky et al. (Leiden: Brill). Retrieved 22 September 2019. quote: "Asdemonstrated by Ratchnevsky (1966: 231), the Shirwi confederation was a multiethnic, multilingual confederation of Tungusic-speaking Mo-ho 靺鞨 people (i.e. ancestors of the Jurchen), the Meng-wa 蒙瓦 ~ Meng-wu 蒙兀, whom Pelliot (1928) and others have shown were Proto-Mongolic speakers, and other groups. The dominant group among the Shirwi undoubtedly were ethnolinguistic descendants of the Serbi (鮮卑 Hsien-pei), and spoke a language closely related to Kitan and more distantly related to Mongolic."
14:30 finally someone show's Timur's Peak Empire at it's true thiccness
영상 잘 봤습니다. 이런 멋진 영상은 어던 프로그램 이용해서 제작하는건가요?
Photoshop 2023, MS Paint, Premiere Pro 2023등으로 사용하고 있습니다.
Brilliant video but I have to point out mistakes, you forgot to make Kazakhstan no longer a socialist republic and let Uzbekistan gain some land after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, but overall, I like the video :D
몽골이 들어서자마자 어마어마한 속도로 점령하는게 보이네요. 알고 있었지만 지도로보니 더 대단한거 같아요.
Title should be History of Eurasian Nomads 😅
Maybe, I could remake "The Central Asia" out of this.
But there are only Turkic and Mongol nomads.
My guy stop it. Don’t steal Mongolian history!
@@nikot4410 AND you don't steal the history of the Turks!
@@Sadoyasturadoglu are you Turkish?
요나라의 실질적 영토가 작았나요? 연한 색은 간접지배인가요?
Anwoo you created a eye opening video on the history of qatar. Can you please make a video on yemen/ethiopia/ Eritrea region pretty please!
Later...
@@Anwwoo thanx
Xiongnu, Göktürks, Avars, Uyghurs, Kyrgyz Khaganate, Timurids and Gurkanid("Mughal") Empire out. Not Mongol. Nice video without that.
🐦
@@papazataklaattiranimam 🐸
Xiongnu is a Turco-Mongol state. So it still counts. But others are agreeable.
Its always Ultra-Nationalists Balkaners and Turks claiming everything's theirs, so automatically their opinion doesnt matter
It's insane that a steppe nation existed at the same time as a classical nation like Thrace
4:46 what makes you think the rouran had anything to do with the Huns?
14:26 티무르 제국 간접지배영역까지 포함하니까 교과서에서 봤던 것보다 2배 이상 크네요 ㄷㄷ
Sanki Moğol değilde Türk Tarihi'ni izledim....
Yarısı Türk zaten
Because your school teacher didn't teach you true history
@@User-c1c4y lol so you're telling me gokTURK empire is Mongolian?
@@User-c1c4y this not true
@@zhuangchuang31 I am saying Xiongnu is Mongolian, they are ancestors of Genghis khan.
👍👍👍👍
Is this video history of the land called mongolia or the people called mongols
Crazy to thing the Mongols still existed during the American Revolution
Still waiting for sikh misls, you can find sources regarding them in kushwant singh history of sikhs and hari ram gupta history of sikhs
혹시 역사학자신가요 ? 전체적인 세계사 흐름을 다 아시는것 같네요 ...
You can help me make video of Казанкое хатсново
Well done
What happened to the Golden Horde? Wasn't it established in the 13th century?
Golden Horde was composed of two states of White and Blue Hordes.
Turkco - Mongol Tucik 🤘🏻
Xıongnu Confederation was Turkic, not Mongol
I said "Mongolia" not "Mongolian History"
Xiongnu is Mongolian because xiongnu is ancestor of Genghis khan.
@@User-c1c4y then genghis khan is turkish, what the hell. Xiongnu was Turkic empire.
Bro has to include a whole map of Eurasia to fit the whole mongol empire
A good history of map development ! but there are still some mistakes. The Mongolian system is more similar to the European feudal dynasty system. Each khanate has a high degree of autonomy, and the same is true for the enfeoffment khanates within their khanate; and, the fact In fact, the Mongolian Empire was united for a period of time after the death of Kublai Qa'an. Strictly speaking, it was not until the disintegration of the Il-khanate in 1335 that the Mongolian Khanates began to gradually abandon the unity of the empire:
13:30-13:48 (1303-1334)
Let me start with the place where the autonomy is strong:
In reality, within the Mongol empire there existed a number of regional powers at various levels. It is in fact difficult to clearly distinguish which of these powers was a ‘state’ or a ‘regime.’ They formed one system in its entirety. Traditionally, the Mongol empire has been regarded to have ‘dissolved’ into ‘four khanates,’including Dai Yuan Ulus, under the great qa’an. However, in fact, all we can say is, at best,that it was divided into four loose groups. If someone claims that it was ‘dissolved,’one should also count orda Ulus, Ariq Böke Ulus and otchigin Ulus among them. The idea of the ‘division into the four khanates’ seems to be a reflection of a [preconceived] image.
【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.20】
Unity of the empire:
Kaidu’s sons and a number of other princes of the houses of Ugedey and Jagatay agreed to recognize Timur’s suzerainty and to settle all future interprincely conflicts by negotia-tion instead of war (1303). This important agreement was supple-mented by making the il-khan of Persia a party to it. Upon the death of the Il-Khan Gazan in 1304 Timur dispatched a grand embassy to Persia to install Gazan’s brother Oljaitu as the new il-khan and to inform him of the pacification of Central Asia. The khan of the Golden Horde, Tokhta, also supported the new agreement. Charac-teristically enough, he in his turn summoned his vassals, the Russian princes, to an assembly in Pereiaslavl, Suzdalia, where his envoy announced the decisions taken by.the leading Mongol rulers.The success of Timur's policy was indeed impressive and the Mongol Empire may be said to have reached the apogee of its power during his reign. All this amounted to a restoration of the unity of the empire in the new form of a pan-Mongol federation presided over by the great khan in Peking.
【Vernadsky, George (1953). The Mongols and Russia, p.82.】
In the Jaghatu valley according to Vaşşâf,that he received the ambassadors of the Great Khan Temür,the grandson and successor (1294-1307) of Qubilai, accompanied by those of Chabar, the son of Qaidu, and Du'a, the son of Baraq: the object of this composite mission was to apprise the Il-Khan of a pact that had put an end to the longstanding quarrels between these branches of the House of Chingiz-Khân. From Marâgheh, where he installed Aşil al-Din, the son of Naşir al-Din Tusi, in the observatory founded by his father, Öljeitü made his way to winter-quarters in Müghân, halting en route at Tabriz to pay a second visit to the Gunbad-i'Âli.In Müghân, on 9 December,he received the ambassadors of Toqta, the ruler of the Golden Horde, who presumably made some allusion to the reconciliation of the princes of Central and Eastern Asia,of which Toqta also had been informed. T o this development, ap parently betokening the restoration of the Mongol world empire as it had existed under Mongke, Oljeitu refers in a letter addressed to Philippe le Bel, which has been preserved in the French national archives. He begins this letter, written at Ativan (Barzand) in Mughan on 5 April 1305, by affirming this desire to maintain the traditional ties of friendship between the Il-Khans and the "sultans of the Frankish people". He then proceeds: " . . . We , Temur Qa'an, Toqta, Chabar,Du'a and others, the descendants of Chingiz-Khan, after recriminating one another for forty-five years down to these recent times, have now,protected by Heaven, all of us, elder and younger brothers, reached a mutual agreement, and from the land of the Chinese, where the sun rises, to the sea of Talu [the Caspian, or perhaps the Mediterranean],our states joining with one another [i.e. re-establishing communi cations],we have caused our post stations to be linked together."
【J.A.Boyle (1968). The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 5: The Saljuq and Mongol Periods, p.399】
The collapse of the unity of the empire:
A holistic approach is necessary for several reasons. first of all, the Mongols themselves did not give up the notion of imperial unity until the 1330s and 1340s when regional uluses began to crumble down. for example,up to that time in the entire Mongol world there was only one qa’an or qaghan, and other rulers used the title of khan or qan. They were all well aware that one was the title of supreme sovereignty over the empire and the other was of a subordinate ruler under his authority.This practice was basically unchallenged till 1364, when the empire ended with the collapse of Mongol power in China.so it was not just a symbolic gesture but an institution that continued to exist for more than one and a half century. It was a reflection of the Mongol world order.
【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.19】
😄😄🥰
Kazakh khanate was 3,5 million km
Direct descendants should be included, such as Crimea and the Kazakh Khanate.
알탄칸은 어딨죠?
알탄 칸은 몽골의 대칸이 아닌 몽골 투메드부의 칸이기 때문에 대칸만을 표시하는 이 영상에는 나오지 않은 것 같습니다..😅
와 첫 몽골 배경음악 진짜 최애 노래 중 하나인데 혹시 진짜 이름좀 알려주실 수 있을까요?
외국 원본 영상에선 걍 몽골 히스토리 송이라고 밖이 안나와서..
저도 원본 영상 밖에 모르는 바람에 'Mongolian historic epic follk-music.flv'라는 이름으로 링크만 설명란에 추가해 놨습니다...
@@Anwwoo 그래도 답글 감사합니다..ㅠ
❤
12:22
Xiongu not mongol
It is mongol
But Mongol area
@@temuulenidk2114mongol is xianbei donghu
@@temuulenidk2114Oghur Turkic origin
16:09 카자흐칸국 그외
xiongnu是蒙古人的祖先？不应该是donghu吗？
Because Xiongnu is Genghis khan's ancestor. WHENGenghis khan created Mongol empire, said "We never got such stronger before Modun Shanyu".
The history of Mongolia was shaped by the Turks 🇲🇳
Silence cockroach
History of Turks was shaped by the Mongols 🇰🇿
@@Mongolian_Lhagvasurenwe shaped thr histories of each other
Sorry to tell you that but mongols have nothing to do with Turks they are their own ethnic group
@@El_primo573 we all know one of the main characteristics of the steppe is ethnic segregation.
Taimur empier 🔥🔥💪💪
한몽 통일이 해답!!!~ㅅ.ㅅ~
Masih kalah lluas nya dg dinasti tang luas dinasti tang 36 juta km2- 40 juta km2 bukti nya Abbasiyah kirim upeti atau hadiah ke dinasti tang
Xiougnu were Turks, not Mongols.
The video includes non-Mongolic states, you can see that the Gokturks and the Orkhon Uyghurs are also included.
Xiongnu is mutli-ethnic Empire. That is why it is Xiongnu "Confederation". It is a union between multiple steppe tribes
@@igidi4424 All empires are multi ethnic. But the founding elit class are always one single ethnicity. We cannot call the british colonial empire , a scottish or irish empire for this reason.
@@omerfaruk6082 Still, Xiongnu is predecessor of the Mongols and that is where most of their family tree comes from. But beyond than just that, Mongolian genes are mysterious to the researchers and historians same as Korean and Japanese genes that have mysterious ancestry. I am saying that the most earliest known ancestors of the Mongolians are Xiongnu. I am not saying the leader of Xiongnu (Mete Han) is Mongolian because we never claimed he was.
@@igidi4424every genes is mysterious, tf is your point