ULEZ - Which cars are exempt? How to avoid clean air fines. Clean Air Zones and CAZ explained.

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 06. 2024
  • Support us on Patreon: / motorhaus
    Are you worried about the ULEZ London Ultra Low Emission Zone? Concerned you may have to sell your car due to CAZ charging? Watch our guide on clean air zone charging and learn the legal loophole that may mean you don't have to pay!
    ▬ Contents of this video ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    0:00 - Intro
    00:30 - Why charging?
    01:45 - Cars Affected
    03:15 - Emissions Exemption
    04:19 - Early Adopters
    05:34 - Registering for Exemption
    10:00 - Historic Exemption
    ▬ Follow us! ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    Want to see more videos like this? Then please Like, Share and Subscribe!
    Follow Motorhaus on Instagram:
    / motorhausof. .
    ▬ Music and Media Credits ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    Music:
    Theme From MOTORHAUS - Bob Malkowski
    Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
    uppbeat.io/t/hartzmann/to-the...
    License code: KGLMZCMSHA0KB4AQ
    Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
    uppbeat.io/t/richard-smithson...
    License code: JO5CWQ48IKWXEFFZ
    Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
    uppbeat.io/t/moire/bees-in-th...
    License code: JKVG9NCOQNWBNPWI
    Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
    uppbeat.io/t/adi-goldstein/i-...
    License code: A1QXDPUFELHFUC3I

Komentáře • 963

  • @Motorhaus
    @Motorhaus  Před rokem +43

    A few comments asked about the specific ULEZ emissions requirements for Diesel vehicles and if it's possible to register them as exempt.
    The information is courtesy of the AA, which lists a breakdown of emissions standards for the various EURO standards:
    www.theaa.com/driving-advice/fuels-environment/euro-emissions-standards
    For Diesel cars, you car would have to meet the NOx and PM values below:
    Euro 6 emission limits (diesel)
    CO - 0.50 g/km
    HC+ NOx - 0.17 g/km
    NOx - 0.08 g/km
    PM - 0.005 g/km
    PM - 6.0x10 ^11/km
    I have no experience if "early adopters" exist regarding Diesel car emissions. EURO6 was a significant jump forward from EURO5 with many cars utilising AdBlue technology.
    Please let us know if you have any success!

    • @southallgreen5584
      @southallgreen5584 Před rokem

      Hi , there's also the fact.
      The EUSSR have no jurisdiction to force anyone in England, to follow any of their bs order's.
      England never Lawfully joined the EUSSR.
      It did though leave under EnglishLaw.
      Though, at the will of the liar's in government here, in league with the EUSSR claiming we did not leave .
      They Lie and say we never left the EUSSR.
      Despite the mandate given by the people of England .
      The government, have not followed those instructions.
      Hence though, we do not have to pay ulez.
      The EUSSR has nothing to do with us.
      Though most asleep do not know this fact.
      Hence are compliant sheeple .

    • @moallysnackbar
      @moallysnackbar Před rokem +1

      EURO TRASH should be ignored

    • @markmooch
      @markmooch Před rokem +1

      I had an old style ford transit (x reg if I remember correctly) that was an early adopter but that may have been LEZ as opposed to ULEZ.

    • @AW8UK
      @AW8UK Před rokem

      Watching this with interest.
      My 05/08/2011 build Mercedes E220 CDI has a COC states Nitrogen figure of 148.50 mg/km which equates to 0.1485 g/km. This mesns it would not be eligible for exemption application.
      I am not a ULEZ or zone guru and this is my 1st (& possibly last) diesel car...
      As touched on in comments...I alsk believe Euro 6 cars have AdBlue additive tanks. Mine does not have same.
      I genuinely like & enjoy my car for what it is...however if I replace it then I may go back to Euro 4 petrol (or one potentially exempt by COC & Nox level)
      Incidentally I am aware of alleged emissions discrepancies subject of group legal actions....albeit not relevant here.
      Great video btw ...thanks👍

    • @caeserromero3013
      @caeserromero3013 Před rokem +1

      Only ONE death even remotely attributable to 'Air pollution'. Also, the Mayor and others can't even get the story straight as they often quote 4000 deaths in the press and online. I really do wish people would wouldn't keep repeating these BS figures as if they're true when they're clearly NOT. Motorhaus has a responsibility to present FACTUAL info and not just repeat govt propaganda. You'd think someone posting a video on ULEZ would do their research a bit better really. Poor content.

  • @ryanlongley5052
    @ryanlongley5052 Před rokem +369

    Everyone should just get together rip the cameras down and smash them up

    • @kevinsavage2911
      @kevinsavage2911 Před rokem

      I am sorry to say, you are right, they will never change until the population takes direct action.

    • @TachyonDriver
      @TachyonDriver Před rokem +23

      This is when the French people do it better than us: They love a good protest complete with burning tyres and blockades!

    • @TrevsTravelsByNarrowboat
      @TrevsTravelsByNarrowboat Před rokem +32

      Everyone should just refuse to pay the charge. If they take you to court insist on a trial by jury, which is your right, and just wait to see how quickly that clogs up the system and makes it unworkable.

    • @frauddetective2695
      @frauddetective2695 Před rokem +9

      Iam up for that, no problem,

    • @mikeheasman2594
      @mikeheasman2594 Před rokem +34

      Newly installed cameras close to me have already had their cables cut.

  • @ilonamorland4928
    @ilonamorland4928 Před rokem +321

    It just takes EVERYONE to stand up and say NO!! Not look for loopholes. You are complying with their corruption.

    • @TheMaxbw
      @TheMaxbw Před rokem +7

      never gonna happen. you have to play the game

    • @ilonamorland4928
      @ilonamorland4928 Před rokem +41

      @@TheMaxbw But it's attitudes like yours that land us in the positions we're in!! Just keep on complying, give them all our power, and let them trample all over our rights? That might be your silly idea but it doesn't suit others that want a life!

    • @jamesadey8744
      @jamesadey8744 Před rokem +24

      BS! Do you really believe what you're saying? There is no evidence of even one person dying of traffic pollution, let alone nine thousand.

    • @simonsmith6158
      @simonsmith6158 Před rokem +8

      @@jamesadey8744 its bogus as well. There is a difference between a life taken and a life possibly shortened by a few weeks/ months

    • @melvinplant8637
      @melvinplant8637 Před rokem

      There is no such thing as a clean air ZONE, AND THAT IDEA OF THAT AMOUNT OF PEOPLE DYING IS TOTALLY A BIG FAT LIE, STILL THEY HAVE ALWAYS LIED TO US.

  • @swiderTheRealOne
    @swiderTheRealOne Před rokem +155

    Recently, I had to drive into central London. Normally, I would have used my wife's 2011 BMW 320d, nice efficient car. Instead, thanks to ULEZ, I used my 2002 Lexus LS430, a V8 gus guzzler, which is exempt. Feeling good saving the planet😁

    • @markmooch
      @markmooch Před rokem +2

      Air pollution is not the same as greenhouse gasses, although there is probably overlap?

    • @lucindafergusonart
      @lucindafergusonart Před rokem

      Exactly the only reason they are doing this is to make money because the criteria has been twisted to suit a money grabbing narrative , mass non compliance is only way to stop those parasites

    • @scrappykriss2728
      @scrappykriss2728 Před 11 měsíci +8

      I recently scrapped a perfectly good Landrover Diesel Discovery 2.7ltr because of the impending ULEZ Expansion to cover my home. I replaced it with an older gas guzzling Petrol Range Rover Sport supercharged V8 that IS compliant- bonkers

    • @MichaelCook84
      @MichaelCook84 Před 9 měsíci +1

      @@markmooch greenhouse gases are a load of nonsense mate. How much gas do you have coming out your greenhouse?

  • @TrevsTravelsByNarrowboat
    @TrevsTravelsByNarrowboat Před rokem +370

    I check out how many people died from pollution in London in recent years. this is what I found. "There was 1 death registered in London in the period 2001 to 2021 which had exposure to air pollution recorded on the death certificate in either part 1 or part 2 of the death certificate. This death was attributed to environmental air pollution, however, we are unable to determine whether this involved car emissions"

    • @perk70
      @perk70 Před rokem

      www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsinlondonasaresultofcaremissions

    • @derrenlambert2279
      @derrenlambert2279 Před rokem +28

      Yep this is true..✌❤

    • @steverostill4186
      @steverostill4186 Před rokem

      He's quoting Sadiq Khants figures which are bullshit. An independent report, ignored by Khant, backed up your research data but this channel is ignoring it too. The new ULEZ will have negligible affect on cleaning the environment.

    • @timdean9665
      @timdean9665 Před rokem +13

      That was a famous test case, the little girl involved was literally the first to have such a recording by the coroner so it’s unsurprising that there is only one. That doesn’t invalidate the peer reviewed studies that show the probable cause behind the quoted numbers.

    • @LeeKirkman88
      @LeeKirkman88 Před rokem +7

      Exactly

  • @mikeatcora
    @mikeatcora Před rokem +152

    If your vehicle has an MOT, it's passed a standard set by the government and cannot be overridden by any council or Mayor. The idea that the MOT isn't recognised for the purposes of collecting revenue is laughable, if a Mayor or council thinks they can invalidate the MOT standards set by government, they need to think again. A legal challenge will either eradicate the emissions part of the MOT or the ULEZ zones will be deemed unlawful.

    • @steverooke1717
      @steverooke1717 Před rokem +11

      Great point👍

    • @jtyson6025
      @jtyson6025 Před rokem +12

      Unfortunately that's where the 'Ultra' part of the otherwise 'low emission zone 'has been sneakily implemented

    • @severnsea
      @severnsea Před rokem +14

      Problem is we've heard this argument many times before....illegal to be caught by a camera rather than stopped by a police officer but they got around it; illegal for a council to fine you for parking, that went to court so they got around it by calling it a Penalty Charge Notice instead of a fine; and so on. They're twisting the laws for their own gain knowing that they will get away with it.

    • @theseustoo
      @theseustoo Před rokem +12

      @@severnsea The only answer to such blatant corporate money-grabs is mass non-compliance! They can't imprison everyone for non-payment of fines... and it's unlikely they'd even bother to try because if the idea of fining people is to raise revenue for The Corporation, they're hardly likely to want to pay what it costs to imprison people for non-payment. They'd lose a fortune!
      But everyone needs to be brave enough to do it... it's likely a few none-payers of fines will be imprisoned, at least at first... Corporations are a bit stupid and it sometimes takes them a little time to realise what's not really in the interests of their shareholders.
      However, they'd stop imprisoning people pretty quickly because that costs them tens of thousands of dollars per year for every prisoner and there really aren't enough prisons to hold everyone if EVERYONE refused to pay the fines.

    • @bannjaxx
      @bannjaxx Před 10 měsíci

      You're not a lawyer are you? 😉

  • @RAM_845
    @RAM_845 Před rokem +173

    In other words they do NOT want people to have CARS

    • @DevAnubis
      @DevAnubis Před rokem +2

      In general we need fewer cars, so in a sense, yes...

    • @Jackhat369
      @Jackhat369 Před rokem +7

      Yes they love you having a car it's just another way to tax you

    • @abi4841
      @abi4841 Před rokem

      So the WEF want us to own nothing and be happy and use a FAKE CLIMATE CHANGE to unfurl this nonsense

    • @Jackhat369
      @Jackhat369 Před rokem

      @@abi4841 they just want all our money, they will be charging by the mile in London soon instead of the congestion charge

    • @DevAnubis
      @DevAnubis Před rokem

      @@abi4841 sure... The capitalists built an industrialised consumer economy based on endless oil consumption and buying new poorly made products every few years so that they could ...
      *checks notes*
      Wean everybody back off cars and oil and mindless consumption for ... reasons??? At great threat to their profits...
      Riiiiiiiight...

  • @mcearth3592
    @mcearth3592 Před rokem +86

    This loophole may work for a bit, but Khan's final plan is to charge by the mile so no matter what car you are driving, you are going to pay, this ULEZ is really a foreplay for what's to come.

    • @halfordslain7477
      @halfordslain7477 Před rokem +2

      Just block a couple of letters or numbers on your reg plate. Untraceable...

    • @melvinplant8637
      @melvinplant8637 Před rokem +8

      Not if we say, NO WE WONT

    • @douglastodd1947
      @douglastodd1947 Před rokem +3

      So Khan's going to Abolish The Road Fund Revenue that you pay to Travel on the Roads, somehow i don't think the Govt. will be happy if we all STOP paying the Road Tax AS WE PAY tax Voluntarily. Unalienable Right to Travel Freely (unimpeded) in the Course of ONE's Life & Business LEVY FREE.

    • @adamrees3675
      @adamrees3675 Před 11 měsíci +2

      Are you sure these are khans plans an not some sausage eaters plans?

    • @melvinplant8637
      @melvinplant8637 Před 11 měsíci

      @@adamrees3675 don't you mean, german sausage eater, KLAUS SCHAUB.

  • @karlroberts4783
    @karlroberts4783 Před rokem +66

    BAN Private Jets , Helicopters and Luxury Yachts FIRST! small cars? its ridiculous!

    • @edc1569
      @edc1569 Před 10 měsíci

      Certainly should be no cruise ships in london

    • @Syd_Layne
      @Syd_Layne Před 10 měsíci

      ​@@edc1569 Cruise ships and super yachts often come into London...
      czcams.com/video/ULtAwgYTpDc/video.html
      czcams.com/video/2zkaLR0C5vs/video.html

    • @AntonyClayton-eq1ul
      @AntonyClayton-eq1ul Před 9 měsíci

      Any body know how Ross Noble is getting on, with his congestion charge exempt Scorpion tank?

  • @thecheez3418
    @thecheez3418 Před rokem +100

    Perhaps you could explain how a ULEZ charge cleans the air! If the mayor was really concerned about people's health, he would ban dirty vehicles instead. But I would suspect the extra income will be spent on a folly somewhere.

    • @timdean9665
      @timdean9665 Před rokem +1

      The air inside the original ULEZ is already demonstrably cleaner, so it shouldn’t need much explaining.

    • @twig3288
      @twig3288 Před rokem +13

      1 death tenuously linked to air quality?
      There are far more deaths from stabbing in London
      How about charging £12.50 per day to carry a knife in London?

    • @Greeba
      @Greeba Před rokem +1

      @@twig3288 You were breathing while you typed this drivel, ergo it is possible to do two things at the same time. Knife crime has absolutely nothing to do with air quality.
      I've responded to other 'what about' comments on this video which were at least about other air quality matters, and even they were straw man arguments. Yours is... less valuable.

    • @twig3288
      @twig3288 Před rokem +6

      @@Greeba you seem to think that the lives of young black youths are less of a priority than charging people to pollute. Disgusting!

    • @BernardSamson-hf6fc
      @BernardSamson-hf6fc Před rokem +1

      @@timdean9665 No it doesn't, it coincides with their ILLEGAL lockdowns. Lockdown, another prison term, when are the sheep going to realise they are being herded to the gas chambers? see Hancock's leaked text messages.

  • @oomz1975
    @oomz1975 Před rokem +66

    How about nobody complies, system would collapse if we all decide not to pay.

    • @birdnestratfest
      @birdnestratfest Před rokem +5

      point me towards the resistance im in.

    • @van-gabondramblinrose6398
      @van-gabondramblinrose6398 Před rokem +2

      As people are doing in Birmingham

    • @seamusburke9101
      @seamusburke9101 Před rokem

      You must be joking, people are scared shirtless cause they're stupid.

    • @mountainbearoutdoors
      @mountainbearoutdoors Před rokem

      @@van-gabondramblinrose6398 correct, Birmingham council had to bin off over 70,000 tickets as people are refusing to pay, stick it to em bollocks to Khan and his little hitler regime.

    • @Stigman101
      @Stigman101 Před rokem +1

      @@birdnestratfest 40000 tickets got wiped ..

  • @bobhope7375
    @bobhope7375 Před rokem +46

    The thought of going to London, let alone driving through it, fills me with dread. However, discovering that my 52 year old land-rover is ulez-theft exempt Inow quite fancy a trip into the 'bottom' of the UK..

    • @John-ob7dh
      @John-ob7dh Před rokem

      You can't dodge the congestion zone charge ( unless in a disabled vehicle)

  • @martin-jj9pe
    @martin-jj9pe Před rokem +89

    It is not about emissions it about money

  • @jamesathorp6947
    @jamesathorp6947 Před rokem +50

    Between 2001 - 2021 there was only 1 death that put pollution down as possible cause of death

    • @EnglishLaw
      @EnglishLaw Před rokem +1

      I knew I wasn't imagining it. Thanks

    • @annewicks4993
      @annewicks4993 Před rokem +4

      Yep 1 death where pollution was found to have contributed, however it stated this cannot be completely attributed to vehicles. And seeing as vehicles make up prob 12% of londons pollution there are many other factors. Plus the child had a number of health conditions.

  • @spotastar
    @spotastar Před rokem +65

    Sadiq Khan’s, to reduce toxic air by expanding the ULEZ to greater London will not work.
    He doesn’t really care about toxic air quality and here is why:
    - He has already made the toxic air far worse since he has introduced the LTN’s which have increased the toxic air on the main roads because we are forced to use them as there are no other alternatives, especially during rush hour. The roads are now grid locked with traffic moving at walking pace and the fumes are getting denser and not dispersing. LTN’s need to be reopened as it is causing more damage than good.
    Among all this, the mileage in vehicles has also increased due to the fact that we are forced to go the long way round to get to the required destination - all accumulating to even more emission being emitted! Bravo Sadiq & team.
    - The health for pedestrians and children as they walk along these main routes to get to stations, schools, shops is deteriorating. Even the drivers inhale more fumes when we are stuck in stationary traffic. This is really aggravating and makes no sense!
    - Cycle Lanes: Should not be taking up an extra lane of the roads, large pavements could be divided into two for cyclists.
    - The introductions of 20MPH roads are also a problem because emission fumes don’t disperse quickly and the air is getting even more polluted because of the need to drive in lower gears.
    Sadiq’s statement: “It is to reduce toxic air pollution” is clearly not accurate and is making matters worse. The situation is getting extremely out of hand and something needs to be done to stop him from ruining our climate even more. He should resign and Londoners should vote for someone who will make London a greater and more desirable place to live in. There needs to be a more logical and strategic plan that is well thought.
    Vinnie Lauda

    • @markmooch
      @markmooch Před rokem

      Would the increase of traffic on main roads be off set by the vehicles being less polluting?

    • @severnsea
      @severnsea Před rokem +2

      It's not about reducing toxic air though, it's about making money. The motorist has always been an easy target but since they switched control of minor offences from the police to the council they have milked it for all it is worth.
      It's like fitting DPFs on diesel cars. Millions of motorists around the world are now having to take their cars on regular runs to keep the DPF clear, otherwise they clog up. Increasing the amount of mileage people do isn't going to do anything good, but it's got nothing to do with that anyway.

  • @imax006
    @imax006 Před 11 měsíci +11

    I was thinking of buying a non ULEZ compliant car and putting it in the mayor's name and parking it everyday in Zone 1. Let him get the tickets and see how he likes it.

  • @sdadiahla
    @sdadiahla Před rokem +85

    There is a big issue here, as soon as one single person proves a car to be exempt, the ULEZ database should automatically allow the same for all models of that year, why should umteen people have to pay money and go through this hassle when it is the authority behind ULEZ that has got it wrong/ and fails to update its records? The system should be changed, once you prove them wrong, the ULEZ authority should have to pay you back for incurred cost and time as it is their error.

    • @spanishjohn420
      @spanishjohn420 Před rokem +26

      because its a money grab

    • @philipgeorgiev
      @philipgeorgiev Před rokem +16

      They don't want you to have a car, look up 15 minute cities , the great reset

    • @Lozcbr
      @Lozcbr Před rokem +12

      Exactly, is TFL actually fraudulently taking money from vehicle owners when they have been given proof that that model of vehicle is exempt. Needs a car motoring group to raise a lawsuit in regards to this.

    • @TheNikolius
      @TheNikolius Před rokem

      Because the men in this country are pathetic. This wouldn't happen in France

    • @Neddie2k
      @Neddie2k Před rokem +9

      The system is not about emission; it's about collecting money and justifying it. The government doesn't care who has a respiratory disease and what caused it because paying more fines doesn't solve the problem.

  • @markjeep9415
    @markjeep9415 Před rokem +18

    If they had more of the traffic lights setup so you don't get stopped at every set the total emissions would be massively reduced.

  • @jeffvaljean6030
    @jeffvaljean6030 Před rokem +68

    I am thinking of setting up a business specifically for london its a donkey and cart hire I mean the donkeys are smarter than the average labour voter in London and how else will the poorest get about or move stuff around

    • @steverostill4186
      @steverostill4186 Před rokem +13

      Perhaps your first cart pulling donkey could be Khan himself.

    • @catsandcrafts171
      @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem +1

      Didn't Boris start this whole mess? I think the tory voters are the idiots at the moment. (I'm a swing voter in the north of England, so don't accuse me of being a rabid 'leftie, as people usually do when I point out the current cognitive dissonance in the tory population).

    • @catsandcrafts171
      @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem +10

      @@steverostill4186 I've got a mental image of Khan pulling Johnson on a bike. It's made me laugh too much. I need to get out more. :D

    • @iTCXtreme
      @iTCXtreme Před rokem +2

      😆😅🤣😂👍👍👍

    • @kevinwhite981
      @kevinwhite981 Před rokem +9

      That all very well, but you'll probably find your donkey won't meet the new criteria coming in on donkey emissions. Wouldn't it be nice to rewind to the 60s or 70s and stay their, the world is a mess.

  • @japfourme381
    @japfourme381 Před rokem +16

    Clean Air Zones! What a load of tosh!!

  • @mikesheldon1957
    @mikesheldon1957 Před rokem +7

    There is a very REAL loophole that one Londoner is using and its funny, he has a 2002 car that's obviously not compliant but he can't afford to replace it and it runs ok and has passed its MOT's with no problem. He decided the ONLY way he can get out of paying the ULEZ charges is to fill out the cars V5 and register the registered keeper as Sadiq Khan at Transport for London so in effect giving them the responsibility of being the keeper of his vehicle BUT he still owns the car. He can tax, mot and take out insurance on the vehicle and drive it but any ULEZ charges will be sent to the registered keeper, namely Mr Khan. The best thing is for Londoners en masse need to re-register their cars as Khan and Transport for London being the new registered keepers, doing that the ULEZ will be destroyed from working and a failure.

  • @glennbartlett416
    @glennbartlett416 Před rokem +88

    Or there's another legal loop hole it's called don't be a fool and know your stuff. Don't pay altogether, let the penaltys come, wait for it, then work the system, and then ask for your day in court under your article 6 right to a fair trial or hearing - and will you get one? Nope because there is no real legal contract in the matter as long as you pay road tax on the public roads not private roads then you have a right to drive anywhere in the country! Organisations are not above the law! 😀

    • @Ron2615
      @Ron2615 Před rokem +5

      ask for ur day in court? pls explain mate coz i like the sound of this lol

    • @honeybadger9425
      @honeybadger9425 Před rokem +7

      I expect what they plan to do is sell the debts on to harassing company’s

    • @davidedgar7338
      @davidedgar7338 Před rokem +2

      ​@@honeybadger9425moorcroft I reckon. They love it. Lol

    • @royrj5517
      @royrj5517 Před rokem +5

      We should ask for a court hearing, with a jury and take the 'law' along with you, the jury have the right to decide wether the law is just, if not the law has to be scrapped.

    • @ianmitchell9102
      @ianmitchell9102 Před rokem +1

      Unfortunately some non paid fines go straight to the bailiffs and not the court

  • @johnnyhollis9977
    @johnnyhollis9977 Před rokem +36

    So if everybody paid the daily penalty then that would be okay then! This is a money making scam as a lot of people now know. Just following on behind this to keep the money rolling in will be road charging per mile! It's all in the London Mayor's battle plan to make motor users lives as uncomfortable as possible. Nice video by the way!

    • @catsandcrafts171
      @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem +2

      I don't think it's this particular mayor who's making it hard, this has been happening for a long time. How can we forget 'Boris Bikes' for example :/

    • @johnnyhollis9977
      @johnnyhollis9977 Před rokem +3

      @@catsandcrafts171 If you watch his arrogant attitude during the London Assembly meetings it may surprise you.
      The nasty little man ordered the cameras even before the public consultation had even started! He also needs the money to pay for other schemes so the pay per mile will be introduced too at some point. 🙄

    • @clivewalker5465
      @clivewalker5465 Před rokem +1

      Just like Smoking , '' We could Ban Smoking , but better results from Taxation '' .

  • @Teleport73
    @Teleport73 Před rokem +27

    Thanks for a useful video. This may provide a small stay of execution for some, but it won't be long before the exemption bar is raised.
    Eventually the cameras will be switched over to charge drivers of ALL cars (including electric) by the mile.
    At that point the argument will conveniently switch from air-pollution to congestion. Or there will be evidence
    that even zero emission cars still produce particles from their brake dust, and from tyre wear.

    • @douglastodd1947
      @douglastodd1947 Před rokem +1

      DEFUND THE COUNCILS, Stop paying Council TAX . We under OUR Unalienable Rights Don't Pay TAX, we are classed as LEVY FREE, any Taxes we do pay are Voluntary to improve OUR Standard of living , we don't give the money to A Council to turn it around and USE OUR MONEY AGAINST US, ITs given to Benefit us.

    • @severnsea
      @severnsea Před rokem +3

      @@douglastodd1947 Exactly, this is what makes me angry. They are PUBLIC roads, not the property of some council or mayor to do what he wants to with (i.e. make money).

  • @carlarthur4442
    @carlarthur4442 Před rokem +30

    What about airports with all the planes flying in and out of Heathrow.

    • @paullynch1938
      @paullynch1938 Před rokem

      And all the private planes and a fleet on Range Rovers the government have got

    • @catsandcrafts171
      @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem

      That's a serious case of 'whataboutery', air travel is taxed in an entirely different way. I've no idea if it's fair or not, but it's nothing to do with the ever increasing number of cars on the road.

    • @saracentiano
      @saracentiano Před rokem

      They are euro7 compliant.

    • @26TANGOMIKE037
      @26TANGOMIKE037 Před rokem

      @@saracentiano 😂

    • @Lookup2Wakeup
      @Lookup2Wakeup Před rokem

      Biggest polluters in the air.....but exempt no doubt.

  • @jeffmason
    @jeffmason Před rokem +24

    Your figures are wrong on the deaths, there has been ONE recorded death on a certificate that the causation was from a definite source, which was vehicle pollution. This was from a young asthmatic girl

  • @TheEastcote
    @TheEastcote Před rokem +26

    I think most of the unclean air / particulates, come from aircraft / helicopters and not from cars. Do the authorities plan to fine them ? I think not. This is just a method of transferring money from the poor to the rich. Why don't they charge people on the number of flights they make ?

    • @peetsnort
      @peetsnort Před rokem +2

      Yes Heathrow is up wind of London and they don't even pay the same fuel duty.

  • @peterpartington8367
    @peterpartington8367 Před rokem +6

    WE NEED MORE BLADERUNNERS , THAT WILL HELP ! 👍🏻😎

  • @minniemouse1332
    @minniemouse1332 Před rokem +1

    Heard about this,, brilliantly explained thank you.

  • @geoffwright9570
    @geoffwright9570 Před rokem +13

    Hate to say it but when ulez come in that will be the last time I shall be visiting London. One thing though will it include diesel trains as well?

  • @steverostill4186
    @steverostill4186 Před rokem +11

    Never mind certificates of bloody conformity. You should join the rising tide of anger at Chairman Khants tax on the poor.

    • @GWAYGWAY1
      @GWAYGWAY1 Před rokem

      He got there because he got the Muslim vote and no real other reason other than he is a Knight Templar and swore to follow the agenda

  • @aprimesuspect
    @aprimesuspect Před rokem

    Thank you man, this helps a lot information is appreciated. Keep up the good work.

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před rokem

      Glad to help! Thanks for the positive feedback!

  • @alphaomega5721
    @alphaomega5721 Před rokem +1

    Cracking video. Thank you.

  • @justmeEnglandUK
    @justmeEnglandUK Před rokem +15

    I've had lengthy exchanges with a Caz zone regarding my van it's a ex Stockport low emission lpg vehicle mine was the first batch which was leased to fleet management companies and councils on a trial . These vehicles proved very successful and after a year they went into full production these vehicles are fully exempt and at the time of mine registration euro category didn't exist . The vehicle didn't change specifications remained exactly the same but mine was classed as a dirty high polluting vehicle . Ford did a car version with seats and windows in the back fitted with one of fords most polluting diesel engines and because it PLG car it's exempt my van version with windows rear glass and ford factory fitted LPG Low emission vehicle is chargeable . It's a scam

    • @andrewtitcombe8378
      @andrewtitcombe8378 Před rokem +1

      Went into Bristol with a none compliant vehicle. Had to drive further and stuck in back streets in traffic jams to avoid the centre. So Yes it's working well there to avoid emissions in the town centre. I suspect the council's plan will be to expand the plan further out to counter this. Rather than see how much of an inconvenience to locals and traders.

    • @severnsea
      @severnsea Před rokem +1

      @@andrewtitcombe8378 Exactly, because it's about making money, not stopping cars from driving there.

  • @LeeKirkman88
    @LeeKirkman88 Před rokem +19

    They are taxing electric cars too and charging for brake disc wear. How does money make the air cleaner?

    • @DevAnubis
      @DevAnubis Před rokem

      No one is charging for brake disk wear...
      And as for EVs, the VED exemption was always going to be temporary.
      Frankly per-mile taxation makes the most sense anyway. Gather the odometer data at MOT time, issue an annual tax bill and give a year to settle it before the next MOT.

    • @ASausageDog
      @ASausageDog Před rokem

      @@DevAnubis but they want to charge for it.. check it out, fukin ridiculous stuff going on at the moment and ive been around since 85.. we aint entering some mad climate catastrophe, allll bull shit power grab

    • @derrenlambert2279
      @derrenlambert2279 Před rokem +3

      Yes, TYRE TAX AND BRAKE TAX..

    • @LeeKirkman88
      @LeeKirkman88 Před rokem

      @@DevAnubis you carry on thinking that you are in for a shock. The Government is not going to lose Billions in tax money. They'll get it back another way. They might call it a road Maintainance tax ?

    • @DevAnubis
      @DevAnubis Před rokem +4

      @@LeeKirkman88
      I didn't say they wouldn't reform vehicle tax, in fact I explicitly said that per-mile taxation was the most likely future scenario...
      But taxing brake disk and tyre wear would just effectively be an additional purchase tax on buying new brake disks and tyres, which would undoubtedly lead to people putting off replacing worn brakes, pads and tyres, leading to safety issues.

  • @kcolcj
    @kcolcj Před rokem

    Thank you, very useful information.

  • @mywaveinwoodswoodperfumes
    @mywaveinwoodswoodperfumes Před 9 měsíci +1

    Thanks for the info

  • @hoonaticbloggs5402
    @hoonaticbloggs5402 Před rokem +16

    It’s ok to pollute, as long as you pay

  • @brianlopez8855
    @brianlopez8855 Před rokem +6

    This will finally kill Town Centre viability. What a great idea.

  • @Tummy786
    @Tummy786 Před 9 měsíci

    It worked! Sent certificate and log book digitally.
    Got letter confirming exemption and checked web site, which showed exception.
    Thank you, thank you very much.

  • @davemargison2451
    @davemargison2451 Před rokem

    Excellent info 👌 thanks

  • @MOB34M
    @MOB34M Před rokem +6

    Don’t know where you got your data from, but between the years 2001-2021 their was 1 death registered in London down to environmental pollution, however they could not confirm this death was down to car emissions, and that’s according to the ONS government website, you should immediately redact your doomonger titanic analogy

  • @carlosfandango6255
    @carlosfandango6255 Před rokem +4

    Catalytic converters don't work then?

  • @jameswright3087
    @jameswright3087 Před rokem

    Great info,well done

  • @motorclaimguru
    @motorclaimguru Před 10 měsíci

    Superbly presented, and very informative.

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před 10 měsíci

      Thank you Tim! We hope to have you on the channel at some point in the future!

    • @motorclaimguru
      @motorclaimguru Před 10 měsíci

      @@Motorhaus I look forwards to it

    • @motorclaimguru
      @motorclaimguru Před 9 měsíci

      I look forwards to it! I did a piece on stage at the British Motor Show with Tim and Fuzz on ULEZ, and the con it is. Whilst referencing the difference in unburned hydrocarbons between petrol and diesel, along with Sulphur emissions. Has we have not change to diesel purchased in the noughties, It can well be argued that had we stuck with petrol , air quality would be better and ULEZ would not be needed.

  • @michaelmarsden1777
    @michaelmarsden1777 Před rokem +3

    You’ve shown the min NOx level for earlier Euro 4 Petrol cars, what’s the level required for a diesel cars of 2011 with present NOx 0.099? Will this fall under the current exemption?

  • @ianbrant1013
    @ianbrant1013 Před rokem +5

    Just a side note under freedom of information act 1 yes one single person has died as the result of poor air quality in London not the 3 titanic ship loads as mentioned in this video

  • @stewartwilliams2541
    @stewartwilliams2541 Před rokem

    Very good and clear info. Answers I had are answered.

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před rokem

      Glad it was helpful! Thanks for the positive reply!

  • @nusratshaheen4913
    @nusratshaheen4913 Před rokem

    Excellent information 👍

  • @jasonpocaro2730
    @jasonpocaro2730 Před rokem +4

    If it's done by camera check and NOT in person. Just block your plate and keep on driving. The speed cameras here in Cleveland are (mostly gone) now. There's always a way around things like this 😂...

  • @petergouvignon8048
    @petergouvignon8048 Před rokem +7

    how to avoid false no plates

  • @bikerdash27
    @bikerdash27 Před 11 měsíci

    Thanks for excellent Video.

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před 11 měsíci

      Thanks for the kind words! Hope it was of help!

  • @mrradiocontrol3523
    @mrradiocontrol3523 Před rokem +2

    Thank you will do this ASAP for my E36

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před rokem +1

      Please keep us posted as to if you’re successful!

    • @mrradiocontrol3523
      @mrradiocontrol3523 Před rokem

      ​@Motorhaus hi there I have just received my certificate and on the NOx it's stating 0.000 g/km

  • @mrslowly9985
    @mrslowly9985 Před rokem +7

    The number of people who have died officially due to 'pollution' since records began is 1, they suffered from hyper asthma. The 9000 a year is based on models and we all know how accurate them models are!

  • @catsandcrafts171
    @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem +7

    Didn't know any of this, Bob! Just discovered I'd have to pay to go to Manc or Bristol, 2 places I do go to occasionally. Thank god for Sheff there's no charge. What a flippin nightmare this is... I already found the London system to be a pain, so thrilled other cities are rolling it out.

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před rokem +1

      @cats and crafts - glad we could help, sorry it's not the best of news though!

    • @personalcheeses8073
      @personalcheeses8073 Před rokem

      Sheffield has got charges. The council is totally onboard with this insanity

    • @stephenhowe568
      @stephenhowe568 Před 10 měsíci +1

      Try it in Scotland, there are five cities where it's an instant fine zone (IFZ).
      No charges, no permits.
      If the idea was thought through like the French have done we would be ok but not on this small insignificant isle where common sense has been eroded from the minds of people who think they are in charge. If only they'd had proper training first on how to please the people and not their egos. 🫣

  • @nateryan7041
    @nateryan7041 Před rokem

    Excellent video mate

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před rokem

      Many thanks! Hope it’s been of some help!

  • @AdelinoGambiarras
    @AdelinoGambiarras Před 8 měsíci

    Thanks a lot I definitely going to do jost as you mention on the video thanks 👍 👌

  • @chrisgoldfingertv
    @chrisgoldfingertv Před rokem +5

    A friend of mine bought 3 Mercedes vans for his company, as he’s got a removal business. The vans are the same year, make, & model, two of them are exempt and 1 is not, he rang DVLA to ask why, and they said they are investigating the reason and will get back 🤔🤔🤔. Also I’ve found out I have to pay for my certificate of conformity from General Motors Euro as I drive an import, with VERY LOW emissions, stated on my MOT records. This is all a rip off.

  • @joshclayg
    @joshclayg Před rokem +5

    So if it's about health then all the proceeds and fine money goes to research and treatment of those unknown people that MAY be effected?
    No, thought not.

  • @goldbar5062
    @goldbar5062 Před rokem +1

    Thank you mate ! I am applying for my E30 BMW 1990.

  • @igorandrejev5935
    @igorandrejev5935 Před 10 měsíci

    Good gob! thanks

  • @philipgeorgiev
    @philipgeorgiev Před rokem +7

    Don't pay the fines. Don't be an idiot, next they will charge you by the mile !

  • @MrShlomping
    @MrShlomping Před rokem +10

    Euro 6 was mandatory from sep 2015 not 2014. Plenty of older euro 6 cars too. 2010 cx5 or a 2011 730d.

  • @murrayblair67
    @murrayblair67 Před 9 měsíci

    Brilliant explanation!
    Thank you 🙏
    I shall be rallying around my local ULEZ capital with my oil burning mg midget!

  • @curtisj2165
    @curtisj2165 Před rokem +5

    Give it time and the goalpost will be moved

  • @caeserromero3013
    @caeserromero3013 Před rokem +3

    Even the mayors own study showed the ULEZ zone expansion would bring only 'minimal' benefit, that's why he refused to release the data. It found that most 'particulate matter' was made up of brake dust and particles of rubber tyres shed through wear. only about 15% of the particulate matter was from engine emissions. EV's use brakes, and they also use rubber tyres. They can wear tyres quicker due to the extra weight of the batteries etc. So switching to EV's won't help. But this isn't about 'health' or the 'Environment' or even 'green energy', it's about increasing govt control of people's lives. Believe me, it won't stop here, and just because your car is exempt today, doesn't mean they won't keep moving the goals posts once ULEZ is established. Meanwhile of course, Sadiq drives around in an armour plated Range Rover....

  • @aaronag7876
    @aaronag7876 Před 11 měsíci

    Outstanding Video and following your ways I managed to get a COC for my 2016 LWB Diesel Van (Euro cat 5 engine), but sadly after chancing my luck with TFL, they rejected my application, as the NxO was just over the limit. Thank you anyway, it was very helpful to know this. My V5 had the figures on the form, which I didn't see but the COC confirmed the values.

    • @Motorhaus
      @Motorhaus  Před 11 měsíci +2

      Thanks for the positive words and glad you enjoyed the video! Unfortunately it’s looking increasingly likely that unless your diesel vehicle uses AdBlue then it won’t meet the NOx requirements for ULEZ.
      Best wishes from us!

  • @alex-djevans5494
    @alex-djevans5494 Před rokem

    So you mentioned in this video thay this is different for vans and other vehicles. As from August this year my small company that owns 2 vans and 1 lorry will be right on the boarder of the new proposed ulez zone. I woulf be interested to see if there was a loophole for vans and lorrys as we simply cannot afford to upgrade so are currenty refusing work inside the zone as from August unless the customer pays the daily ulez charge.

  • @DevAnubis
    @DevAnubis Před rokem +10

    I know your channel is primarily concerned with retro/classic and 90s shod _wot will won dey be retroh_, but the biggest thing I haven't seen in the entire CAZ "_debate_" has been discussions on how many, or rather how few, vehicles will be affected, even in a propper Class D zone like the ULEZ where private vehicles aren't excused.
    Gov.uk publishes vehicle registion data, and my back of the napkin spread-sheeting from the 2021 data suggests:
    50% of diesels are newer than Euro6 (~6.0m)
    91% of petrols are newer than Euro4 (~17.3m)
    Not too surprising as there's a decade between the standards.
    Together that's ~23.3m compliant vehicles, ~72% of cars on the road as of 2021.
    What's most interesting is that the percentage attrition rate seems basically linear across the first 15 years of a modern vehicle. Total cars has grown by about 10% (3m) since 2004, but was basically flat from 2018, and yet the percentage change of cars by age in 2021 is linear right up until they're 15-ish years old, suggesting that really most cars are lost to accidents and writeoffs and then the final few get run until they can't run no more (or turned into future-classics for 'all).
    With that typical attrition rate, the modern non-pliant petrols would probably have dies off soon anyway down to the roughly 3% floor of "classics" that seems pretty linear from 2001 and older. But I suspect we'll see a massive drop in the non-compliant diesels, far faster than the "organic" rate in the 2021 data.
    Anyway I should sleep...

    • @markmooch
      @markmooch Před rokem +1

      It’s just bad timing with the cost of living crisis and booming car market.

  • @DevAnubis
    @DevAnubis Před rokem +6

    I've seen loads of people misunderstanding the MOT emmisions tests, and particularly misunderstanding that the MOT does *measure* NOx emmisions, but actually has no pass-fail criteria for it.
    The only pass-fail emissions tests in the MOT are for carbon-monoxide and uncombusted hydrocarbons.
    Presumably the government do use the NOx emissions data for something, and hopefully one day there will be pass-fail criteria for NOx or at least a rating scheme for vehicles as they age (because frankly any 9 year old Euro6 diesel is going to be dirtier than when it was new).

  • @luisbranco-wx7zm
    @luisbranco-wx7zm Před rokem +1

    Excellent info but What is the figure I'm looking for, for a diesel car??

  • @brentwestbrook
    @brentwestbrook Před rokem

    I was working in Wimbledon from 2018 to early 2020. I commuted from Devon on a Monday and returned on a Friday. I used my Nissan 350Z and Audi A5. Just one week I decided to use my 51 plate VW T4 Camper.
    I used the A3 for my journey.
    I didn't realise that camper vans were subject to LEZ since 2012.
    Sure I got a £500 reduced to £250 if paid promptly.
    Using your expertise, was this a valid fine with NOX values?

  • @peterwright9546
    @peterwright9546 Před rokem +5

    Are vehicles registered as disabled exempt ,they do not pay road tax . But could be an older car such as a Berlingo which is wheel chair accessible.

    • @annewicks4993
      @annewicks4993 Před rokem +2

      Disabled registered vehicles are exempt til 2027

    • @catsandcrafts171
      @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem

      @@annewicks4993 Ohhh, good to know!

    • @kellysmith1421
      @kellysmith1421 Před rokem +1

      @@annewicks4993 only around the corner then …pay per mile will be with drivers before then 😢

  • @thomascoyne157
    @thomascoyne157 Před rokem +4

    That’s the biggest load of bollocks, I’ve ever heard only one person has been recorded in London and this is well known.

    • @stevencole7780
      @stevencole7780 Před rokem

      It was one little coloured girl that lives near Lewisham and she had asthma anyway and she lived near the High Street

  • @danielwi11iams
    @danielwi11iams Před rokem

    How does this work, with the scandle on emission with cars that was brought to light a couple of years back, that was doctored by the manufacture. would that certificate hold up. Are the emissions on the certificate correct.

  • @area51london
    @area51london Před 10 měsíci

    I've got a 2002 slk 32 amg. Ive just found certificate of conformity..do i just randomly email this to tfl and dvla ? Or do i write to them..please advise as i love this car and want to take it off sorn and start using again..thanks for this vid big thumbs up!

  • @sparks6057
    @sparks6057 Před rokem +5

    One death recorded in foi request its rubbish to say people are dying from poor air in london

  • @theuktoday4233
    @theuktoday4233 Před rokem +6

    I would like to see the way these figures of deaths are arrived at

    • @twig3288
      @twig3288 Před rokem

      The mayor makes them up and the BBC says it must be true because the mayor says so.

    • @godslittlehelper3209
      @godslittlehelper3209 Před rokem +2

      Its porkie pies!!

  • @Pauleyjh
    @Pauleyjh Před rokem

    Thank you....

  • @johnelliott9415
    @johnelliott9415 Před rokem +1

    Does that include Volkswagen LT 35 truck does that include if it’s TAX and MOT exempt on the emissions be interested to know As it’s 40 years old

  • @nesteghtm560
    @nesteghtm560 Před rokem +5

    All a load of bs I can have a 40 year old car and not pay ???

  • @trevoradams3350
    @trevoradams3350 Před rokem +6

    Your video about health implications is not correct
    There are so many studies out there showing otherwise

    • @DevAnubis
      @DevAnubis Před rokem

      Not sure if on the side of cleaner air...
      Or believes internet over peer reviewed science...

  • @daveholds6672
    @daveholds6672 Před rokem +1

    When I drive into London I always seem to get a bit off plastic bag litter on some off my registration plate 🤔

  • @tooyoungtobeold8756
    @tooyoungtobeold8756 Před rokem +5

    If you believe anything Guardian publishes (especially 8 years ago) you're half-way to the nut house.

    • @ACIDvICTIM
      @ACIDvICTIM Před rokem

      like the bbc they are gov propaganda -Sad that some folks pay attention to it let alone pay for it

  • @redacted629
    @redacted629 Před rokem +6

    The public should "rollout" smart political decisions zones. If politicians do stupid things to an area... fine them. Two can play at this money grab. I think volkswagon could help with certificates of conformity... they well last time with diesel emissions.

  • @ps-ib3hy
    @ps-ib3hy Před 10 měsíci

    I have 2011 Skoda octavia diesel what do I need to do to find out if it's exempt from the ulers charges

  • @peterdimartino2812
    @peterdimartino2812 Před 2 měsíci

    do you have to register a historic vehicle or is it automatic ? grate video thank you.

  • @jaybrox1652
    @jaybrox1652 Před rokem +5

    What a lot of BS 9500 dead due to bad air...yoy get polution from tyres and tarmac and benzol which is emited by evry car burning on petrol.The few hundred of old cars left on the roads dont make a sligtest difference.

    • @DevAnubis
      @DevAnubis Před rokem

      Believe it or not they can actually test for that and the origin of the particulates by the material in them...
      And yes, brakes, tyres and road surface wear do all contribute. Tyre companies are developing new materials, EVs use their brake disks significantly less, particularly in slow urban driving, and the point is to reduce the levels as much as possible.
      And then there's the question of PM.25 and PM1 being far more harmful as they can cross the blood brain barrier.
      And also ignoring NOx which is purely from combustion.

  • @Pob2278
    @Pob2278 Před rokem +3

    So you could be liable to pay a congestion charge and a ULEZ charge ?

    • @alextaxi2593
      @alextaxi2593 Před rokem +4

      Yes a double charge i have paid it before

    • @catsandcrafts171
      @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem +2

      @@alextaxi2593 That is disgusting! One or the other, but both is a complete farce. How frustrating for those who need to travel round London regularly :(

    • @alextaxi2593
      @alextaxi2593 Před rokem +4

      Its a double double charge if you arrive before 6 pm and leave after 6am as you are on two days

    • @lordleonusa
      @lordleonusa Před 10 měsíci

      Plus you're paying road fund licence, plus 81% tax on fuel, plus insurance, plus MOT charge, plus VAT on parts and servicing etc.,candidates soon a mileage charge.

  • @24-7ttplumbingheating4
    @24-7ttplumbingheating4 Před 2 měsíci

    Hi mate thanks for the video tips I applied for it and my reading came back 0.081 I'm hoping they will round it off to nearest decimal point look forward to hearing back from you mate?

  • @thebeerinnandrewmckenna2655

    Hi, I have a 2004 Zafira 2.0dti, and the emmisions on v5 Sat's 196, is there anything I can do about getting out of any charge, like do you know ifnit would work

  • @steveholloway1963
    @steveholloway1963 Před rokem +4

    Quite simple don't pay the fines if everyone refused what can they do put everyone in prison

  • @tinfoilhatter5318
    @tinfoilhatter5318 Před rokem +5

    Just don’t pay . Legislation isn’t law.

    • @catsandcrafts171
      @catsandcrafts171 Před rokem

      Legislation is literally 'laws'. Literally. That's what the word means!

    • @sharpysparky5505
      @sharpysparky5505 Před rokem

      Dont talk bollox @cats and c, legislation are rules NOT LAW

  • @gurveersinghsohanpal3259

    Great video. Do you know Nox is calculated? Because I checked the spec on my bmw x5 and it is showing the nox to be @ 150mg/km is that right? My car is a 2013 x5 30d.

    • @John-ob7dh
      @John-ob7dh Před rokem

      They checked my bike level on a dyno .

  • @equaliser2265
    @equaliser2265 Před rokem +3

    Air doesnt stay in one place does it? Towns are not under a glass bowl are they? This is a load of bollox

  • @justmeEnglandUK
    @justmeEnglandUK Před rokem

    My commercial vehicles is a early adopter they manufactured 1000 pre production vehicle sold to fleet companies and councils . After a years trial which was successful they went into full production these vans are exempt from all charges . Mine was registered in the higher category and charges are applied

  • @barrylengbl
    @barrylengbl Před 10 měsíci

    My 1999 Audi A4 2.4 litre is not exempt .. so upon ur advice i checked the Nox rating on the V5 .. it didnt state any figures on the emission section all my other cars did.. which is annoying.. i gues I'll have to obtsin the Certificate of Compliance..

  • @my_carp_life3424
    @my_carp_life3424 Před rokem +3

    The data is not exactly scientifically correct as it did not take into account people's previous health conditions or where they previously lived in the world, its completely flawed.

  • @dodgydruid
    @dodgydruid Před rokem +3

    I've been locked in a war of words with GLC over their refusal to not exempt my car which is prob one of the most fuel efficient cars out there... 70-80mpg Reliant Robin gets stuffed for the same amount as a modern normal car yet is half the size, a fraction of the pollution but GLC are so up their own arses its a tragedy. Same as my poor mate who lives in Deptford, 120mpg Vespa, he's cornholed every way by stupid rules as there is NO exemption for classic vehicles whilst heavy polluters seem to get a free pass :(

  • @138FrOsTy138
    @138FrOsTy138 Před 7 měsíci

    Hi, I was given a pdf version of the certificate and it's kind of hard to decipher what they mean on the emissions, in that box it just says e11*70/220*91*441 (Euro 1) have you seen this before? Cheers