Shah Ismail could have possibly be as great as peoples as Cyrus the Great, Timur the Great and Alexander the Great because he won many battles and destroyed many Empire in is time like those 3 and he was outnumbered 3 to 1 most of the time and killed is rivals in the battle IN BATTLE WITH SWORD LIKE REAL WARRIOR and didn’t need cannons is rivals like Muhammad Shaybani Khan , Farrukh Yassar etc etc made Safavid Iran one of the most powerful empire in the world in only 12 to 13 years 15 or more battle was won by Shah Ismail of Persia more than 90 % of ruler and military commanders in history and he was outnumbered all the time 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 but still completely destroyed many states Timurid Empire , Aq Qoyunlu, Afrasiyab dynasty , Shaybanid Empire and others battle like Battle of Jabani (1500)Battle of Sharir (1501)Siege of Tabriz (1501)Battle of Sharur (1501)Battle of Hamadan (1503)Battle of Tabriz (1503)Battle of Nakhchivan Safavid Safavid conquest of Mazandaran (1504)Safavid conquest of Gorgan (1504)Safavid conquest of Yazd (1504)Battle of Najaf (1507)Battle of Karbala (1507)Battle of Van (1508)Battle of Erzurum (1508)Battle of Baghdad (1509)Battle of Merv (1510) and others but after the Battle of Chaldiran his aura of invincibility shattered he was never the same he could have become one of the best military commanders in history but he was never the same after is first and only lost he also made both the kingdoms of Kartli as well as Kakheti his vassals and by the way Shah Ismail won more battle than any Ottoman ruler in history and also he lost because of Ottoman artillery he never lost in faire battle
History experienced many warlords some justifies like Cyrus the great mythridates Alexander Crusaders and some destroyers and tyrants. About Ismail safavi he according the safavid's historian themselves was a extragerator fanatic and ruthless villain and his army has contained of nomadic misleaded qizilbashes that attempted so many crimes in Iran Caucasus east Anatolia Syria Iraq kharazm central Asia Afghanistan and Iraq.surely he beside chinggizkhan and temur Gurkhani and aqa mohammadkhan Qatar was most criminality and blood thirsty warior of middle east.besides he was an alcohol addicted and sodomist on based books rowzeh ye safavi Alamara ye abbasi and memoir and diaries of western tourists chardin Tavernier airlines pietro de LA Valle shelves brother Chelbi and other afterward history books.its said reason of his defeat in Chaldoran war was due it's badly drunken soldiers and himself in battleday.from his famous method of punishment was boiling alive pelting victims dragging and tearing apart by horse and eating alive his enemies stacking...
"Xətai də natiq oldı Türkistanïn piri". Shah Ismail in his poem "Bahariyyə" says he is turk Books of that time Alem-ârâ-yı Safavi. Alem-ârâ-yi-Şah Ismail. Tarihi-Alem-ârâ-yi-Abbasi In them the Seffevids are referred to as Turks, Turkomans.Butler writer Shah Abbas Iskender bey Munshi in his book about Abbas mentions him as a young Turkic ruler.Sheikh Sefi's Persian friends in their books indicated him as "Turk piri". Shah Ismail in his verse indicated himself as "turkistanpiri".turkistanpiri "the leader of Turkistan. From here you can even find out that he was a Turkic and considered his state as Turkistan. The state was otherwise called Devleti-Qizilbash
Türkçe çeviri : “…Şeybanî Han gibi ben de tüm Türkistan kralını öldürdüm ve şimdi prensimiz , nevabimimzin [neslimizin] tüm çabalarını boşa çikarmasindan ve bu çocuğunİran krallığına devam edemeyeceğinden korkuyorum …” Kaynak : Alam Araye Şah ismail Kitab ile ilgili kisa bi bilgilendirme : Kitabin ismi ve yazarı bilinmiyor , Ancak genelde Şah ismailin hayatini anlatiği için bu ad koyuldu . Şah Süleyman'ın Şahlığının onuncu yılında yazıldığı bilinmektedir. ✍ Kitabin PDF mevcuttur ancak malesef Discordun MB siniri yüzünden paylaşamiyorum
" Tam Faridin, Khosrau, Jamshid, and Zohak (!). I am Zal’s son (Rustam) and Alexander"- V.Minorsky poetry of shah ismail p.43 "Should Afrasiyab be my foe, I shall take it for a dishonour to come to blows with him."- V.Minorsky bulletin of shah ismail poetry p.46 here we can see that shah ismail absolutely depised afrasiyab who was the mythical ruler of Turan in the shahnameh while likening himself more towards mythical persian heroes and Sassanid King Khosrow
“…kitabın bu bölümünün sonunda bunun ayrıntılarını vermeyi umuyordum. Ancak Tanrı, İran krallığında istikrarı yeniden tesis etmenin ve İranlıların işlerini düzeltmenin I. Şah Abbas'ın kaderi olması gerektiğine karar verdiğinden, Şah Abbas tahta çıkana kadar hiçbir rahatlama gelmiyordu. Tanrıya şükür ki, o kralın rahman yönetimi altında İran düşmanları adil çöllerini aldılar ve ele geçirdikleri toprakları parçaladılar ve savaşan kabileler bir kez daha uyum içinde birlikte yaşıyorlar…” Kaynak : Tārīk-e Ālamārā-ye Abbāsī , Eskandar beg monshi , translate by Rogor M.Savory , P.347
Bildiğiniz gibi bir kaç zamandir ki “şey safiye turk piri deniliyordu demeki turk” diyerekten ve kaynaği da safat al-safa vererekten şeyh safinin turk olduğunu iddia ediyorlar . Verdikleri kaynakları bile Cehalet üzerinden okuyamayan bu kesimin cevabini kitabin kendisi vermiştir . Cevabi kitabin kendisinden duyalim : “Bir gün şeyh [arapça dua , Tanrı ruhunu arındırsın anlamında] oturuyordu , mihrabın duvarı açıldı ve biri ordan çıktı ve şeyhi talep etti ki «ey Turk piri» . Ve şeyhi [Arapça dua , ruhu şah olsun anlamında] Türk piri dedi ; o sebepten ki gayeti Cemili , Hüsn ve kemalindeydi .” Kitabin kendisinin yazdığından çok açık bir şekilde anlaşılır ki «Türk piri» diye kullandığı kavram sadece Sıfat olarak kullanıldı , onun Türklüğü ile alakası yoktur . Bunun gibi şeyler fars edebiyatında tarihte çok kullanılmıştır , sadece Türk’le sınırlanan bişey değildir «Hindu» kelimesi de en az Türk kelimesi kadar fars edebiyatında kimlikle kalmayarak sıfat olarak kullanıldı . Dememiş olmayalım ki aynı sayfanın devamında şöyle yazar : “ ve şeyh o şahsı dinledikten sonra , dedi «Türk piri», hazır ol ki 3 gün sonra namaza yetişemezsin , önündeki namazında oleceksin , senin dönemin bitmiştir “ Göründüğü üzere şeyh safi ona «Türk piri» diyen şahsı ayni şekile «Türk piri» piri diye seslenir ve bu «Türk piri» kavramının sadece sıfattan ibaret olduğunun ispatıdır
“…Şah Süleyman döneminde mamlikat-ı İran terimi bulunur, ancak tarihçi Iskandar Beg Munshi (1616-17') de yazan, Şah Tahmäsp I dönemindeki Safevi devletine atıfta bulunarak benzer nitelikteki terimleri sıklıkla kullanır: mülk-i İran; mamālik-i İran, 'arsa-yı İran (sonuncu terim belki siyasi olmaktan çok coğrafi)…” “…Roemer, İran'ın idari bir varlık olarak varlığının Safevi devletinin kurulduğu tarihten itibaren Osmanlılar tarafından kabul edildiğine dikkat çekti. Osmanlı sultanı II. Bäyezīd'den Şah İsmā'il I'e yazdığı bir mektupta ondan pādishāh-i İrān olarak bahsedilir…” Kaynak : The Cambridge History Of İran , Volume 6 , The Timurid And Safavid Periods , p.352
after cyrus II , the Shah ismael I was the greatest king of iran, who is united iran 900 years after arab invasion but the way , your video is sht.t propaganda all of harsh punsihment scens are from sunni Afghanistan and not from shia iran
@@sorena9809 from 630-1500 was iran not united, There was no iraninan stare the State like Seljuk Sultan or Mongol IL Khan, Timur lang , Aq Quyonlou were not iranian, and did consider themself as iranian Ismael I was the first Shah-In-Shah of iran since Arab Invasion The current State of iran is more und less the successor of Ismael I
@@abbasabbasi2474 the state of iran today is the conclusion of the solidarity of the people not ismail. the kings in the seljuk era had iranian titles like jahangir and etc and i have to add that seljuks and timur were in khorasan and it was from iran then despite they were turk they had been talking persian so it want alien another thing samanian and safarian are jokes to you?
@@abbasabbasi2474 but something i have to say the things you are saying is the result of disregarding about history in our country and im really sorry no one cares. 😢☹
@@sorena9809 seljuk and timur and mongols adapted some part of persian , iranian culture but I doubt they call themself iranian ,give themself perian name that is nothing special but ismael was the fist king call themself Shah-In-Shah of -iran, nobody before him did it. that is very signifcant in the history of iran after arab invasion
look the pic u jave shown was from afghanistan where there is 90%sunni so they are not shia and it is not the worst thing happended to iranians because there were lots of people who were interested in science and arts. the fact that they may helped to mullas and they have been more powerful than the past but it wasnt a sabotage so please change ur video thanks
@@channelpersia2982 is not an accurate depiction And by the way shah Ismail limited de-Sunnifiction to easten southern regents of Iran the places that where under the influence of ottomans. modern day Azerbaijan and other remanded Sunni until qujar dynasty founder. overall Safavid were tolerant towards other religious so I don’t think you give the Safavid there credit
One of the best Iranian empires after islam🇮🇷🇮🇷
Overall one of the best Iranic Empire in history
Shah Ismail could have possibly be as great as peoples as Cyrus the Great, Timur the Great and Alexander the Great because he won many battles and destroyed many Empire in is time like those 3 and he was outnumbered 3 to 1 most of the time and killed is rivals in the battle IN BATTLE WITH SWORD LIKE REAL WARRIOR and didn’t need cannons is rivals like Muhammad Shaybani Khan , Farrukh Yassar etc etc made Safavid Iran one of the most powerful empire in the world in only 12 to 13 years 15 or more battle was won by Shah Ismail of Persia more than 90 % of ruler and military commanders in history and he was outnumbered all the time 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 but still completely destroyed many states Timurid Empire , Aq Qoyunlu, Afrasiyab dynasty , Shaybanid Empire and others battle like Battle of Jabani (1500)Battle of Sharir (1501)Siege of Tabriz (1501)Battle of Sharur (1501)Battle of Hamadan (1503)Battle of Tabriz (1503)Battle of Nakhchivan Safavid Safavid conquest of Mazandaran (1504)Safavid conquest of Gorgan (1504)Safavid conquest of Yazd (1504)Battle of Najaf (1507)Battle of Karbala (1507)Battle of Van (1508)Battle of Erzurum (1508)Battle of Baghdad (1509)Battle of Merv (1510) and others but after the Battle of Chaldiran his aura of invincibility shattered he was never the same he could have become one of the best military commanders in history but he was never the same after is first and only lost he also made both the kingdoms of Kartli as well as Kakheti his vassals and by the way Shah Ismail won more battle than any Ottoman ruler in history and also he lost because of Ottoman artillery he never lost in faire battle
History experienced many warlords some justifies like Cyrus the great mythridates Alexander Crusaders and some destroyers and tyrants.
About Ismail safavi he according the safavid's historian themselves was a extragerator fanatic and ruthless villain and his army has contained of nomadic misleaded qizilbashes that attempted so many crimes in Iran Caucasus east Anatolia Syria Iraq kharazm central Asia Afghanistan and Iraq.surely he beside chinggizkhan and temur Gurkhani and aqa mohammadkhan Qatar was most criminality and blood thirsty warior of middle east.besides he was an alcohol addicted and sodomist on based books rowzeh ye safavi Alamara ye abbasi and memoir and diaries of western tourists chardin Tavernier airlines pietro de LA Valle shelves brother Chelbi and other afterward history books.its said reason of his defeat in Chaldoran war was due it's badly drunken soldiers and himself in battleday.from his famous method of punishment was boiling alive pelting victims dragging and tearing apart by horse and eating alive his enemies stacking...
His mother was GREEK!
Sanctions should be removed from Iran. 🇵🇰💙🇮🇷
"Xətai də natiq oldı Türkistanïn piri". Shah Ismail in his poem "Bahariyyə" says he is turk Books of that time Alem-ârâ-yı Safavi. Alem-ârâ-yi-Şah Ismail. Tarihi-Alem-ârâ-yi-Abbasi In them the Seffevids are referred to as Turks, Turkomans.Butler writer Shah Abbas Iskender bey Munshi in his book about Abbas mentions him as a young Turkic ruler.Sheikh Sefi's Persian friends in their books indicated him as "Turk piri". Shah Ismail in his verse indicated himself as "turkistanpiri".turkistanpiri "the leader of Turkistan. From here you can even find out that he was a Turkic and considered his state as Turkistan. The state was otherwise called Devleti-Qizilbash
Türkçe çeviri :
“…Şeybanî Han gibi ben de tüm Türkistan kralını öldürdüm ve şimdi prensimiz , nevabimimzin [neslimizin] tüm çabalarını boşa çikarmasindan ve bu çocuğunİran krallığına devam edemeyeceğinden korkuyorum …”
Kaynak : Alam Araye Şah ismail
Kitab ile ilgili kisa bi bilgilendirme :
Kitabin ismi ve yazarı bilinmiyor , Ancak genelde Şah ismailin hayatini anlatiği için bu ad koyuldu . Şah Süleyman'ın Şahlığının onuncu yılında yazıldığı bilinmektedir.
✍ Kitabin PDF mevcuttur ancak malesef Discordun MB siniri yüzünden paylaşamiyorum
" Tam Faridin, Khosrau, Jamshid, and Zohak (!). I am Zal’s son (Rustam) and Alexander"- V.Minorsky poetry of shah ismail p.43
"Should Afrasiyab be my foe, I shall take it for a dishonour to come to blows with him."- V.Minorsky bulletin of shah ismail poetry p.46
here we can see that shah ismail absolutely depised afrasiyab who was the mythical ruler of Turan in the shahnameh
while likening himself more towards mythical persian heroes and Sassanid King Khosrow
“…kitabın bu bölümünün sonunda bunun ayrıntılarını vermeyi umuyordum. Ancak Tanrı, İran krallığında istikrarı yeniden tesis etmenin ve İranlıların işlerini düzeltmenin I. Şah Abbas'ın kaderi olması gerektiğine karar verdiğinden, Şah Abbas tahta çıkana kadar hiçbir rahatlama gelmiyordu. Tanrıya şükür ki, o kralın rahman yönetimi altında İran düşmanları adil çöllerini aldılar ve ele geçirdikleri toprakları parçaladılar ve savaşan kabileler bir kez daha uyum içinde birlikte yaşıyorlar…”
Kaynak : Tārīk-e Ālamārā-ye Abbāsī , Eskandar beg monshi , translate by Rogor M.Savory , P.347
Bildiğiniz gibi bir kaç zamandir ki “şey safiye turk piri deniliyordu demeki turk” diyerekten ve kaynaği da safat al-safa vererekten şeyh safinin turk olduğunu iddia ediyorlar .
Verdikleri kaynakları bile Cehalet üzerinden okuyamayan bu kesimin cevabini kitabin kendisi vermiştir .
Cevabi kitabin kendisinden duyalim :
“Bir gün şeyh [arapça dua , Tanrı ruhunu arındırsın anlamında] oturuyordu , mihrabın duvarı açıldı ve biri ordan çıktı ve şeyhi talep etti ki «ey Turk piri» . Ve şeyhi [Arapça dua , ruhu şah olsun anlamında] Türk piri dedi ; o sebepten ki gayeti Cemili , Hüsn ve kemalindeydi .”
Kitabin kendisinin yazdığından çok açık bir şekilde anlaşılır ki «Türk piri» diye kullandığı kavram sadece Sıfat olarak kullanıldı , onun Türklüğü ile alakası yoktur . Bunun gibi şeyler fars edebiyatında tarihte çok kullanılmıştır , sadece Türk’le sınırlanan bişey değildir «Hindu» kelimesi de en az Türk kelimesi kadar fars edebiyatında kimlikle kalmayarak sıfat olarak kullanıldı .
Dememiş olmayalım ki aynı sayfanın devamında şöyle yazar :
“ ve şeyh o şahsı dinledikten sonra , dedi «Türk piri», hazır ol ki 3 gün sonra namaza yetişemezsin , önündeki namazında oleceksin , senin dönemin bitmiştir “
Göründüğü üzere şeyh safi ona «Türk piri» diyen şahsı ayni şekile «Türk piri» piri diye seslenir ve bu «Türk piri» kavramının sadece sıfattan ibaret olduğunun ispatıdır
“…Şah Süleyman döneminde mamlikat-ı İran terimi bulunur, ancak tarihçi Iskandar Beg Munshi (1616-17') de yazan, Şah Tahmäsp I dönemindeki Safevi devletine atıfta bulunarak benzer nitelikteki terimleri sıklıkla kullanır: mülk-i İran; mamālik-i İran, 'arsa-yı İran (sonuncu terim belki siyasi olmaktan çok coğrafi)…”
“…Roemer, İran'ın idari bir varlık olarak varlığının Safevi devletinin kurulduğu tarihten itibaren Osmanlılar tarafından kabul edildiğine dikkat çekti. Osmanlı sultanı II. Bäyezīd'den Şah İsmā'il I'e yazdığı bir mektupta ondan pādishāh-i İrān olarak bahsedilir…”
Kaynak : The Cambridge History Of İran , Volume 6 , The Timurid And Safavid Periods , p.352
Best thing happened to iran ❤
Agreed
His mother was Greek
after cyrus II , the Shah ismael I was the greatest king of iran, who is united iran 900 years after arab invasion
but the way , your video is sht.t propaganda
all of harsh punsihment scens are from sunni Afghanistan and not from shia iran
داداچ تاریخو کجا بهت درس دادن؟
کی ۹۰۰ سال ایرانی وجود نداشته؟
@@sorena9809 from 630-1500 was iran not united, There was no iraninan stare
the State like Seljuk Sultan or Mongol IL Khan, Timur lang , Aq Quyonlou were not iranian, and did consider themself as iranian
Ismael I was the first Shah-In-Shah of iran since Arab Invasion
The current State of iran is more und less the successor of Ismael I
@@abbasabbasi2474 the state of iran today is the conclusion of the solidarity of the people not ismail.
the kings in the seljuk era had iranian titles like jahangir and etc
and i have to add that seljuks and timur were in khorasan and it was from iran then despite they were turk they had been talking persian so it want alien
another thing samanian and safarian are jokes to you?
@@abbasabbasi2474 but something i have to say the things you are saying is the result of disregarding about history in our country and im really sorry no one cares.
😢☹
@@sorena9809 seljuk and timur and mongols adapted some part of persian , iranian culture
but I doubt they call themself iranian ,give themself perian name that is nothing special
but ismael was the fist king call themself Shah-In-Shah of -iran, nobody before him did it.
that is very signifcant in the history of iran after arab invasion
look
the pic u jave shown was from afghanistan where there is 90%sunni so they are not shia
and it is not the worst thing happended to iranians because there were lots of people who were interested in science and arts.
the fact that they may helped to mullas and they have been more powerful than the past but it wasnt a sabotage
so please change ur video
thanks
3:29 those look like Sunni afghan
And your point is?
@@channelpersia2982 is not an accurate depiction
And by the way shah Ismail limited de-Sunnifiction to easten southern regents of Iran the places that where under the influence of ottomans. modern day Azerbaijan and other remanded Sunni until qujar dynasty founder. overall Safavid were tolerant towards other religious so I don’t think you give the Safavid there credit
Biased and false information. He was Turkic(Azerbaijani) and created Greater Azerbaijan empire in modern Iran.
Your vedio is utterly biased, and aimed to disparage shah Ismail 1.
GREAT AZERBAİJAN EMPİRE 🇦🇿
Its iranian empire kiddo
@@brightburnedits4278 nope, molla
@@muzafferadguzel5075 yes kiddo you wanna cry clown?🤣
Hey man look at title safavid iran
Kurds origin shah Ismail 🇹🇯👑