1974 GENERAL MOTORS PROMO FILM FOR SAFETY BELTS / SEAT BELTS & GM VANS VS. ECONOLINE 17774
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 03. 2020
- Want to support this channel and help us preserve old films? Visit / periscopefilm
Browse our products on Amazon: amzn.to/2YILTSD
This is a group of films from 1974 made by GM. The first film is a color movie about the Chevrolet Safety Belt System. The film opens with an image of the capitol building in Washington. GM presents, the 1974 Safety Belt System. The film also has shots of the Capitol Building, and Washington Monument. Blonde woman gets into her car, 1:25. Woman buckles her seatbelt, 1:44. Man and woman enter car and learn to use their seatbelts, 2:30. Passenger buckles his seatbelt, 2:55. The seatbelt is demonstrated when the brakes are applied, 3:40. Man mails a letter, 4:00. Woman packs her trunk with large bag, 4:30. Woman enters her car with dog, 5:04. Woman driving, 5:30. Woman enters her car, 5:45. Woman opens her hood and presses bypass switch, 6:20. Woman and friend eat at drive-in, 7:22. Women put seatbelts on and leave drive-in, 7:45. Woman is at toll booth, 8:05. Woman enters car with baby and buckles him in, 8:25. .
The next film is Lasting Value Van Comparison that likely also dates to 1974. The film explains why the G20 Chevy Van is superior to the Ford E150 Econoline model. The film opens with a man moving cargo boxes in the back of his van, 9:41. Man opens different van doors, 9:50. Man checks the oil in his van, 10:15. Ford E150 Econoline van is compared to G20 Chevy van side by side, 10:43. Graphic shows new design of the front end of the Ford E150 Econoline van, 10:51. Ford E150 Econoline characteristics are listed, 11:08. G20 Chevy Van wheelbases are compared to Ford E150 Econoline wheelbases, 11:17. G20 Chevy Van. Curb weights are compared, 12:20. Animations show G20 Chevy Van has a unitzed body and Ford E150 Econoline has a ladder-type frame, 13:05. Ford E150 Econoline cannot fit 14-foot pipes, 13:37. Racks and bins are inside the back of the van, 14:08. One door loading, on the G20 Chevy Van. Comparison of rear-door openings, 14:37. Moving men cannot get the box into the Ford E150 Econoline, 15:06. Comparison of Chevy and Ford Engines, 15:20. Comparison of driver foot area, 15:39. Passenger foot areas are compared, 15:56. Massive girder beam independent front suspension, shielded front shock absorbers, staggered rear shock absorbers, lining wear sensors, front disc brakes, finned rear brake drums, high energy ignition system and Elpo Electrocoating corrosion protection, 16:00. High cube vans with steel or aluminum bodies, 16:47. Chevy cutaway vans, 16:54. Chevy step vans, 17:00. Lasting Chevy value, 17:14. Written and produced for Chevrolet, General Motors Corporation. By the Bill Sandy Company, Inc.
We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."
This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFilm.com
I love how she talks to the dog the whole time but never really talks to her "friend"
I watched the entire seat belt video for one reason........well, maybe pair of reasons.
OK, a couple of very good reasons.
I love how the seatbelt system was so problematic they had to include the bypass switch it in the promo😂
The guy doing the narration in the Van portion of this is the infamous "Turbo Encabulator" video guy
My dad pulled out the seat switch conenctors a few weeks after buying his new Chevy.
I repurposed the seat switch to turn on and off a little 5" black and white TV I crammed under the dash.
That pretty 70's girl is now about 70 years old!!
I was born in '74 and started out with old beater carburetor cars (early '80s models that were +/-10yo at the time), they trained me to always start the engine BEFORE putting on the seat belt in case I needed to mess with something under the hood. Usually some form of percussive maintenance.
First thing that was done to our family's 1974 Cutlass when new was disabling that moronic seat belt system. What a joke.
And it was nice of them to leave the connector in an easily accessible place so anyone with 2 hands can do it.
That toll booth guy was cute! I loved all that young lady's outfits she wore in the first film too. And that baby car seat, oh my Lord.
I think my parents Nova had this seat belt system cuz I remember my dad having it deactivated. We never wore our seat belts in the Nova. My how times have changed.
Sean Dougherty gaaaaaayyyy
What a coincidence that my dad has driven both vans in his life, owning a 74 Chevy Van before I was born and an 87 Econoline conversion van when I was a kid.
I bet this was real popular with customers
Oh yes.
The great engineers at GM put the wiring connectors in a easily accessible location so it was easily disabled by the consumer.
Who wants an electrical version of a mosquito in your ear?
This was mandated is why it was installed but congressed pass a law overturning the mandate. And yeah I think they intentionally made it really easy to bypass.
Been driving chevy vans for about 22 years now. Always used, never let me down. The very first van I had was a 77 Ford econoline. I got it for about $50 in 1990. Was badly rusted and the ignition module was broken so I installed a toggle switch to start it. lol. Kept it for about 6 months and went to chrysler station wagons for 6 years before making the move to Chevy vans. Got a 82 Chevy vandura for about $200 my friend owed me so he gave me his van instead, without even asking me. Drove it to hell and back never let me down. lol. Currently have a 2009 Express that is pretty used up but still going strong. I will drive vans until the bitter end. Can't beat the convenience of knowing you can go to any store and take home anything you want and it is perfectly protected.
I was born in 73 so I had to be about 4-5.
I recall some PSA about wearing seatbelts and asked my parents why we didn't wear ours.
Since then we did, probably a good 4-5yrs before it was law.
Haha no, I'm not looking for a cookie or kudos 🤣
It's just odd the crap that pops in your head and I figured I'd share.
When I turned 16 in 1972 I got my grandfather's 1969 Buick Electra to drive. After about a week of seeing Fasten Seat Belts printed above the steering column I buckled up the lap and shoulder belts one night just for the heck of it. Aside from the obvious safety aspect, I was amazed at the enhanced handling and overall feel of the car when strapped in especially in spirited driving. It became an automatic habit to buckle up. With a friend in the passenger seat, it was rare to get anyone to use the lap belt, let alone the shoulder belt. Back then safety wasn't cool. I didn't think it was cool to eat the steering wheel or go through the windshield.
I love that buzzer...my 73 Camaro still has the buzzer and light.
I made a LOT of money in the late 70's DISABLING those moronic Seat belt systems!!
I just disabled the one on my car. I kid you not. You turn the key on and cycle the buckle 20 times. With the alarm off. Radio bye cruise control don't work till you buckle up
@@Rusty_Nickle These old one don't work that way lol but yeah they include a way to turn it off on most cars now adays
I hope she saved up enough money for a K-tel tape selector. Nothing worse than trying to drive while looking for the Donny and Marie 8 track that fell on the floor.
?
@@Richard_K1630 It was my attempt at humor. Look up K Tel tape selector here on CZcams.
@@hoagie1978
You nailed it bro.😂👍
Her passenger wanted to nail it too I'll bet.
@@hashtag415 That may explain the baby in the car with her at the end.
@@hoagie1978
Lucky man. No need for condoms because all the girls were on the pill in the pre-Aids era. She must've "oopsed" a few days.😎
My childhood friend’s Mom had a Chevy Nova and we were forbidden to ever UNbuckle the front seatbelts! They were left fastened and unused so the buzzer would not come on. Safety schmafety, it was the 1970s- lol
I've always buckled in my groceries just so they won't spill all over the car.
Hopefully you buckle up so you won't spill all over the car
Chevy van the best that's ever been!!!!!!!;;!;;;
Chile we be clicking the seat belt n leaving it
they need to bring the system back for turn signals. Maybe it won't let you turn left or right without putting on a turn signal. Since people have forgotten that they even have that option checked on their option box for their vehicle.
GOOD VIDEO!!!
I Always buckle up. But, even WITH the three-point seat belt, Older cars weren't as safe. They didn't have any airbags, and crumple zones weren't yet perfected.
Braking and Steering have also improved.
6:06 "On position" 6:32 gets back in and it's in "lock" and she starts it.
They must have reached under the seat and undid the connector by accident.
I wasn't even paying attention.
I was busy with getting a chubber because I was watching a woman open a car hood.
Chevy all the way baby!
I bet there were changes to that system shortly after coming out
Congress voted to stop it before the 1975s came out. From then on, the buzzer would sound for maybe 10 seconds, but you could still drive.
4-8, @@pcno2832
@@pcno2832 The law said 8 seconds max I think
5:08 - Seat belt light and buzzer!
Learning curve😀
2:37
I think GM had to omit that part (where the engine won’t start unless all occupants are buckled up) after too many complaints out of the gate.
what chevy doesnt tell you is..ford was first with a hood and forward engine design...also ..chevy doesnt tell you that its front fenders are bolted and welded on at the same time..and chevy also doesnt tell you that ford outsells the chevy van...they were really the f150 is their day
I love my G-vans but anything under the hood is a pain in the rear to work on
I bought a 74 cutlass in 1989 and my dad had one in the mid 80s. I guess that got disabled in those cars.
I doubt there's any '74 car out there with a working seatbelt ignition system
In that seat belt demo film, I'm assuming the car used was a Chevrolet Impala or Caprice, right?
Yup, a fantastic car despite the flawed seat belt ignition system
'74 Impala. 12 mpg tub of lard!
GM: why won't anyone buy our vehicles!?
Me: evidence #1 Seat Belt system that completely immobilizes a car unless seat belts are buckled and the system is prone to failure..
Also 13:26 raise the metal up to the opening in the door and boom it fits..
leepinlepin wingadingdong - that E-Series didn't had a hole there! Nice touch, Chevy!
Safety was gm perfection look at the saab the keys in centre stops keys going into knee cap then theres the tank like features hit a wall at 100mph you'll only write the car off..
GM kicked and screamed when it came to auto safety, like everyone else it took Congress to force them to integrate safety features into cars.
And anti whiplash head restraints
Those head restraints, if adjusted to the driver or passenger's height did prevent whiplash.
I'm glad they made this illegal for them to mandate, that's crazy you could be about to escape being robbed or kidnapped but your car wouldn't start because the seat belt wasn't fastened so you get caught. And it doesn't even make people who don't want to wear them use the seat belt anyways since they'll just buckle it behind them or stick something in the buckle to trick it, and if they're really determined they'll modify the system to bypass it.
Had the chance of driving a Chevy G-20 and a Econoline back then and the Ford was my favorite hands down. One of the pros was that the front axle was in front of me and not under me. The Ford drove like a car and not like a shitty Volkswagen Van like the Chevy did.
What a pain in the ass had to rewire my 74 Camaro for that reason
So much for, Land of the Free.
How many decades after Preston Tucker advocated for seat belts???
Back then very few people buckled up or really cared about safety. I was one of the rare teenagers that wore both the lap and shoulder belts in my used 1970 Buick Electra. They saved me one night in a head on collision with a Cadillac that crossed the center line and hit me head on.
That chick is basically perfect. So few skinny women today in 2020! :(
yeah and not all pierced and tatted up looking like some thug girlfriend. are some trailer park Queen with sweatpants pajama pants whatever you call him t-shirts and flip-flops out in public looking disheveled
@@truckerkevthepaidtourist Yup, this #thicc crap (that I see on Instagram) sucks.... Huge-fat asses... Meh.
She's probably 16.
3.30 or a woman... what a look he gave her lol
Totally filmed in Franklin and Bloomfield Hills Michigan
My 67 Oldsmobile don’t got none
that poor baby ...phew ... Ford vs a Chevy van ..which rusted/broke down first contest..
Good looking 1974 Impala Sport Sedan, Chevy Van, and very attractive ladies! Women were very classy back then like the lady or girl next door! Nice family too! Back in the good old days when vehicles were better looking, had character, not homely looking jelly beans like the Ford Taurus, and stylish like my first car, a 1976 Monte Carlo! One of the very few newer cars that are still attractive is my 2015 Camaro which is styled like a 1969 Camaro, a winner hands down! Just like the newer Impala, Malibu, Colorado, and Silverado! Also it is Cool Looking! GM still makes the best classic looking vehicles! Not ugly (fugly) stuff that look like bugs which originated in Asia like a Nissan! 🤘👍😎😍
First time I saw the headlights on a juke I about threw up.
Not that the rest of the look of the car didn't already make me hurl.
The spirit of America version of the 1974 impala are the pretty cars I ever seen
Low-rise pants were classy??? They were sl*tty as Hell. I hated the girls' styles back then, and I was 15.
This goofy system only lasted for one model year as I recall. If the system failed to work in the rain you would get drenched in order to push the override button. If you were in a bad neighborhood you would be risking your life attempting to start the car. Now we have that awful start /stop system that is suppose to save fuel. I really wish we could keep vehicles as simple as possible.
Well then quit voting for Democrats!
BIG DEAL!
Suspiciously looks like an early Brett Kavanaugh and his wife.
I'm sure glad that the governmental protected us like that. how did we ever survive without their "help"
Some of us didn't. But they aren't around to talk about it.
First thing we did in ‘74 was disable that stupid seatbelt starter lockout system, more government mandated BS! I still had the remains of that thing in my ‘74 Nova when I bought it in the 80’s and you could see where the customer jumped it out when it was new. Dumb idea!
Hilarious - GM compares a G20 to an E150 instead of an E250 and when comparing engines they showed Ford's for a split second to make sure people didn't notice that 460 as an option. GM couldn't answer that until 1990. Also, GM wouldn't even acknowledge the Super Van Ford had with additional length - something else GM didn't have until 1990. Keep trying GM, Ford was/is the van king still.
Is it *really* necessary to have the timecode and domain cluttering all the videos the WHOLE time? It really ruins watching these classic videos...
yes
I guess it's their way of showing ownership. I hate it too.
Here's the issue: Tens of thousands of films similar to this one have been lost forever -- destroyed -- and many others are at risk. Our company preserves these precious bits of history one film at a time. How do we afford to do that? By selling them as stock footage to documentary filmmakers and broadcasters. If we did not have a counter, we could not afford to post films like these online, and no films would be preserved. It's that simple. So we ask you to bear with the watermark and timecodes.
In the past we tried many different systems including placing our timer at the bottom corner of our videos. What happened? Unscrupulous CZcams users downloaded our vids, blew them up so the timer was not visible, and re-posted them as their own content! We had to use content control to have the videos removed and shut down these channels. It's hard enough work preserving these films and posting them, without having to spend precious time dealing with policing thievery -- and not what we devoted ourselves to do.
Love our channel and want to support what we do? You can help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
They systems they have now piss me off. They could have their damn car back if they still used this
*Do you need to get to the hospital in *a hurry?* Rest assured it's better that someone die waiting for you to "re-set the seat belt system" - Your Government.
Wait 40 years , they made this new gas can for safety I've heard.
Don't buy a new Chevy van unless you enjoy watching the paint peeling off of it.
The young lady is hot! well was hot.
Nooo, NOW she's 66 years old and SMOKING!
I would clip that shit behide me lol
A lot of people did buckle up the belts and then sat on them. Then in a head on collision they ate the steering wheel, dash, windshield, or were ejected.
Why oh was it so complex? No wonder Americans didn't take to wearing seatbelts like the rest of the world did. With such a complex and annoying system, I do not blame them!
Baby in the front seat, lol
"Why is your baby in the front seat sir/madam"? LOL. No such thing as booster seats back then, you just had added pillows to boost you up or you just sat in the seat strapped in and could couldn't see anything. I remember sitting on the armrest in the front growing up.
@@milepost4846 I know, I lived it! Riding in the rear window ledge, riding in the back of an open truck, no seat belt in the topless jeeps of the 90's even!
@@WaferMan2012 oh yeah! How could I forget riding in the back of a pickup truck! With all these safety laws, todays kids don't know what fun is.
@@milepost4846 bikes without helmets, outside wherever throughout the day just be home by supper or curfew!
@@WaferMan2012 Rear facing seat like that in the front seat is fine if the car doesn't have airbags which this one doesn't since it has a shoulder belt. The airbag equipped models didnt have a shoulder belt
Chrysler had the worst one of it never work from the factory and was just a piece of shit design..
sometimes you nephew disable that it would start buzzingfor no reason even after everything was perfectly fine out of the blue
I wonder why I was only Chevy and Ford where was the beautiful Dodge tradesman van not allowed in the competition cuz they were getting customized and just badass all the way around..
And everyone wonders why Gm went bankrupt it was stupid things like this!!
Government mandate that was reversed. All cars had it
It was government mandated but congress pass a law overturning the mandate
"Why is your baby in the front seat sir/madam"? LOL. No such thing as booster seats back then, you just had added pillows to boost you up or you just sat in the seat strapped in (when seat belt laws started coming out in the 80's) and could couldn't see anything. I remember sitting on the middle armrest in the front growing up too.