UFOs and Aliens - What Science Says | Donald Prothero | TEDxResedaBlvd
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 02. 2020
- Many people claim to have seen UFOs in the skies or had contact with aliens. Do these claims hold up when subjected to the scrutiny of the scientific method? How likely is it that these claims are true? Dr. Donald Prothero has taught geology, paleontology, and planetary geology at the college level for 40 years at places such as Caltech, Columbia, and Occidental College. In this talk, he unravels the truth behind the UFO phenomenon. Dr. Donald Prothero has taught geology, paleontology, and planetary geology at the college level for 40 years at places such as Caltech, Columbia, and Occidental College. He is the author of 44 books and over 300 scientific papers, and has received numerous professional awards, including a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Schuchert Award for outstanding paleontologist under 40, the Shea Award for writing in geoscience, and the Gregory Award for service to vertebrate paleontology. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx
Well this guy must be fun at parties.
This guy would have defended the flat earth theory in the 16th century.
Or the 21st Century.
WeatherBalloon I’ll defend flat earth right now. You should give it due diligence and check out eric Dubay’s “200 proofs earths not a spinning ball”.
@@ChideNorms Check out Sci Man Dan - He loves Eric Dubay and explains away every point he makes at a level that requires no more than a high school education.
@@ChideNorms I am sorry, you are naive.
@@ChideNorms
Show me a picture of you spitting over the edge then I'll believe Earth is Flat
There's absolutely nothing stopping you "scientists" from going down to take that picture
I was once a skeptic. I used to dismiss claims about UFOs and even crack jokes like this so-called scientist until the day I seen it up close and personal for myself. This event happened back in 2014 off the coast of Puerto Rico. While on a large boat, me and a friend of mine observed what look to be a glowing light flying at a very high altitude then quickly descended down over the water for about a minute or two. At this point the unidentified object was maybe 300 yards from us. I could see every detail very clearly and so could everyone else. It was so unreal it actually frightened me as well as everyone else. It looked as if it stopped to observe us for a minute and then quickly plunged itself into the ocean. As it plunged itself into the ocean it seemed as if it did not disturb the water, like it smoothly glided in without making a wave or ripple. You can see the light reflect through the water as it traveled deeper and deeper until the light disappeared. Then maybe about 20 minutes later another craft or possibly the same one very similar looking ,but just a little further of distance came out of the water and either hovered or floated above the surface of the ocean for about 10 to 20 seconds. Then it quickly risen itself for about 100 feet and then shoot off into either space or somewhere far in the atmosphere. None of us were under the influence of anything. The unidentified craft look to be larger than our boat which had to be every bit of over 100 ft. The shape was hard to describe. It was somewhat triangular but a bit rounded. It had a bluish yellow plasma discharge or light at the bottom in the center and then at the rear in the center and then three red lights at each corner. That day quite literally changed my life because there was no way that that could have been any secret military aircraft of any kind. It was totally silent and accelerated from 0 to maybe 25,000 miles an hour pretty much instantaneously.
It’s actually skeptical to assume a unidentifiable flying object is an alien. It’s unidentifiable you cannot assume it’s an alien. If your on the band wagon of jumping straight to aliens at every unexplainable and unidentifiable thing is skeptical.
They are being critical there is a difference
@@TommyDBeatbox Oh and let me say one more thing. If you were there with me and the other witnesses and seen what we all saw, even though I know exactly where you're coming from. Knowing if you seen it too you wouldn't be saying that anymore and as a matter of fact it would start sounding ridiculous to continuously just say well it's an unidentified thing and to suggest for someone to assume if it is of extraterrestrial origin is crazy. It's the same when someone tries to suggest it's most likely of earthly origin makes them sound crazy to us. Also the fact that there were aquatic scientists, yes aquatic scientist but scientists nonetheless on that same boat who never believed in anything like this, look at you and say they think that was some type of alien spacecraft with watery eyes because of the fear it brought upon all of us, will make you completely understand why we say it cannot be from here or just continuously use the term unidentified. It will make you think twice before thinking it's unreasonable to believe or say it is of extraterrestrial origin. I would bet my life you would believe it to be not from this world as well. Many scientists from across this world never believed in the same phenomena until they experience it too, then they become obsessed.
@@TommyDBeatbox but its clear its a machine all the same... and then you have to ask yourself, "can we built it?" ... because we're the only life on earth that can build machines... if someone sees a ball of light.. thats different... but if it has clear structure... then its a machine.
my point is still the same. Seeing something your eyes cannot explain isn't evidence and isn't a reason to assume it is aliens, just because your mind cannot comprehend what you have seen doesn't mean it's any you can claim. And for someone to say "it is an alien" just because they cannot comprehend it is actual being skeptical. saying "it's unidentifiable and therefore we cannot confirm it to be aliens" isn't skeptical it's just simple sticking with the facts. And sticking with the facts doesn't mean you don't believe in the possibility of aliens but it's just sticking with the facts
Love it !
11:30 He says that the small grey alien started with a movie from 1964; actually, the first description of a gray is from the Betty and Barnie Hill abduction story in 1961.
There goes his argument.
@Mocco Mongananzo that is fine, I was talking about that one.
Exactly
Grey alien go back to the late 1800's. A novel titled Meda: A Tale of the Future published around 1891 by Kenneth Folingsby. In the book he describes his encounter with small, grey-skinned aliens with balloon-shaped heads. The narrator in the book is thrown into the future to a time where everything he knows and recognises has changed dramatically. (It is set in Glasgow, Scotland, if I remember right? My old grey matter isn't always the most reliable databank when trying to remember something from 40+ yrs ago. I struggle to remember what I had for dinner some days! ;-)
If I remember right HG Wells also described similar beings in one of his stories (sorry can't remember which). But I do remember them being described as large heads with little or no noses or was it no mouth? I think they where us in the distant future. A forerunner of the Time-Machine, where the Eloi were also similar to greys (in the book).
So Grey Aliens/humanoid aliens/bug eyed aliens/odd looking future humans etc have been in popular culture and science fiction novels from the beginning of the genre or certainly for a lot longer than the 1960's.
Just saying...
PS, I've read and loved science fiction for a long time (and spin off crossover genres).
'Forbidden Planet' is still one of my fave sci-fi movies of all time (the story, the sets, the colour, the saucer, the robot, the Krell & city, 'the plastic educator' machine, the first ever FTL Travel Speed etc are all fabulous. The story of course is based on, Shakespeare's - The Tempest)
It is also the first ever film to have a 100% electronic music soundtrack. Or as it is worded on the opening movie credits, 'Electronic Tonalities by Louis & Bebe Barron.' No synthesizers back then either. Pure electronics and magnetic tape...
I've even got the album!
@The World According To I'd say that's a pretty good memory lol
The Hill story wasn't published till 1965. Bang goes YOUR argument.
TED, still mad at you for flagging the real UFO Talk: "Wanted: A Science of UFOs | Alexander Wendt |"
Bunch of jokers, these guys.. who do they think they are fooling?
Tell me about it! took the liberty of re-uploading it.. TED needs to step outside of its box.
@Yesmer The same thing that happened in the Netherlands in 1979 occurred in Sweden in 1996.
See "UFO Sweden 1996", here in CZcams.
have you seen ivan0135 clips? what do you think?
@@predator-gt5ip Yes, I have. I do not know what to think of it.
Too bad he didn’t tackle something more intellectually challenging, like the US Navy disclosures from the last 2 years.
My thoughts as well.
that's what I was thinking, has he not heard about the Nimitz incident or Navy guidelines changing on the reporting of UAPs, their egos overwhelm their ability to think outside the box.
I agree
Thank you!!
It's too bad he isn't more intellectually challenging. Period.
One of the better talks on the subject. Cultural argument is persuasive. How do we explain the radar, IR video with eyewitness fighter accounts verified by the pentagon?
Right...I'm 59 and I've seen enough evidence already....I don't need an astro physics pseudo genius telling me what's real....these craft are moving in ways that defy physics as we know it....but we don't even have a unified theory of physics..... Check into the Phoenix lights phenomenon..
Balloons, glitchy radar and misinterpretation of instrument readings. If I've learned anything it's that skeptics are NOT popular, don't get any views but almost always right.
did you see the Pentagon videos? what is misinterpretation there?@@user-gs2jg7fr9e
So, when the science proves the point its a scientific flaw? @@user-gs2jg7fr9e
But science fiction has also depicted ever piece of technology we have today
This won't age well.
Yeah, they are sticking their heads in the sand and hoping for the best. Lol. This presentation was an obvious attempt at misinformation if I have ever seen one.
Not at all... this is quite embarrassing
Word up UFO Jesus!! Hope you upload again soon :)
so US navy is completly nuts publicly admiting ufos...
Didn’t expect to see you here. But I agree, this is misinformation, using logic to make sure the blind, stay blind.
I find it distressing that a so-called scientist renowned in his specialty uses an opposite method, contrary to any scientific approach by drawing definitive conclusions, only from a few examples. This method is not scientific, it's pitiful, it's a shame!
Ken Able Nothing to do with intelligence, it’s just a matter of method! 😀
@Ken Able I have no doubt Le is in fact smarter than this clown. This presentation is absolutely pitiful.
@Le notou -- Have you ever seen a UFO?
Sean Yes I have. Two years ago.
You forgot to add 'Pathetic'
Lol I would want to see this guy try to explain the videos that the American navy released a few years ago 😂
He's not making many good points. 9 myths late.
Months sorry.
my thoughts exactly! this guy is a joke.
Oh those blobs of light?... Yes. Very...uh... Compelling. Lol
All those are proof of, is that you don't know what a fuzzy object is.
The tic tac ufo and navy tapes are debunked by none othet but yhe navy itself, as weather balloons etc. The pilot only observed the ''ufo'' via instruments, and formed many false observasions such as the speed and position of the device. Do your research - don't fall for eye witness' prooves. As of today, there are NONE theories of ufo's that are backed by facts.
If this guy was abducted by aliens and his rear end probed, he would insist it was a dream or hallucination.
Or his wildest fantasy
That and a reach around...
Because honestly, a dream or an hallucination seems much more likely
Aliens are verry real there’s even documents that say we will make the public think believing in aliens is crazy. And I seen aliens clearly
Yeah, because probing anuses is exactly what an Alien Civilization will do. Do you even hear yourself???
Nothing about the Navy, Stanton Friedman, Phoenix lights, Rendlesham Forest.
A documentary is coming out soon based on the Rendlesham Forrest incident called 'Capel Green'.
Don't forget the Belgian wave & the Hudson valley flap.
Nimitz, commander fravor+, 2004
Roosevelt, Ryan Graves+, 2015
Rendlesham Forest, Commander Halt, Jim Penniston, 1980 (Beware the fraud, warren and misinfo)
Operation Prato (Saucer), Brazil,1977
Ariel school, Zimbabwe, 1994
Westall School, Australia, 1966
Trans-en-Provence, France, 1981
Phoenix Lights, US, 19??
Lonnie Zamora, New Mexico, 1964
Malmstrom Air Force Base, 1967
Tehran 1967
@@abc-yg6tk Arizona, Phoenix Lights - 1997
Tehran, Iran - 1976
Nah, He'd probably say they were all hoaxes or something silly along those lines.
...wow! An impressive achiement! This man and his father have managed to solve the UFO mystery in one, late-night sitting, watching TV on the couch! Kudos!
it would be even more impressive still... if you learned how to spell!
Disclosure would create a big problem for scientists when they find out we're actually thousands of years behind.
I wonder what this guy makes of the US Navy sightings with their multiple witnesses, extraordinary flight characteristics and recorded by multiple electronic sensors?
They have all been debunked
@@Knight766who debunked? Explain it please
This is one of the weakest things I've ever seen.
I can understand the need for phenomenon to be replicable, to have controls and peer-review in laboratory science and in many other aspects of scientific investigation. Yet with a huge deal of phenomena this isn't possible. And especially with something as consequential as the possibility that alien life might be visiting our planet, needing it to be replicable and to be able to have controls on it seems absurd! He misrepresents a lot of the information that he delivers and makes conclusions that are wildly biased and seem only to put this subject into a neat box 'lets just call it all a hoax'. The UFO phenomenon is a real phenomenon: there are consistent accounts and reports all over the globe from reputable sources of crafts defying our conventional ideas of what is possible, given our current understanding of physics; The abduction phenomenon is a real phenomenon: you only have to read the work of Dr. David Jacobs and Dr. Karla Turner to see the same thing - there are consistent accounts of what these aliens look like, what they do and how they do things from around the world that give this phenomenon a basis of validity. People are experiencing the same thing. Please look into this seriously and don't take this mindless approach based on our current assumptions of whats possible. Read the literature and make your own mind up! A couple of great books are: 'Alien Agenda' by Jim Marrs and 'Walking among Us' by Dr. David Jacobs - I'd also encourage anyone looking into this seriously to read the Allies of Humanity Briefings which are online here (alliesOfHumanity(dot)org).
@@beyond2535 It did mine. It made me angry.
@@tomw4821 it still needs to be replicable to be factual, if a ufo appeared one time and there was no way to prove it then it likely never appeared; no matter how fantastical or not the phenomena is
Actually I think it's fairly good stuff
@@sheildingepicness ha, so what took down 911? That's hard to replicate but it happened
But Carl Sagan also quotes: “The universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us, seems like an awful waste of space."...
But even Carl Sagen didn't believe that aliens have visited the earth.
@@LookzA He didn't believe it impossible either.
@@scottstreet1 It isn't impossible just highly imporable that we'll ever meet intelligent aliens.
@@LookzA I know what you mean; distances, and being found etc. If 'they' have evolved, even only a few thousand years ahead of us, there understanding of physics and the universe will be profound to us....'as if to be magic' as A.C. Clark puts it. Maybe that's what we're seeing now; something so seemingly impossible, we just don't believe it....?
@@LookzA he was blackmailed into silence
You know what else isn't science? Cracking jokes. If there are aerial phenomena out there that are, indeed, unidentified, then do your job, and take it seriously, and try to study them. That's science.
It has been studied, for years. If anything credible was ever discovered it would be breaking news throughout the whole world. This idea that a coverup conspiracy could exist in todays connected world is absolute madness. 99% of scientists are scientists because they want to uncover the truth. Scientists searching for alien life have the same passion for the truth as fans of science fiction. They watch the same movies and TV shows and share the passion we all have for the truth. The scientific community would never allow a coverup on aliens, it would be leaked within minutes.
@@bluebull399 Also, if it has indeed been studied for years, where are all the the peer-reviewed, published, journals, papers, and findings from these studies? Nowhere. Why? Cause douchebags like this guy in the video would be more than happy to ridicule anyone willing to study these phenomena so much that they would eventually lack all credibility and be out of a job.
@@ConorFenlon The reviews are very, very few, and the studies on aliens did not stood up to scrutinies. As for the moment, the scientific stance is there has not been any credible evidence of any alien coming from another planet.
You've hit the nail on the head 👌 This guy, along with other so-called scientists like Neil DeGrasse Tyson really irk me, because of their close-minded and blinkered view towards UFOs and aliens. Even if they don't believe in aliens, why don't they bother to take a *serious* look at what these UFOs could be ? Their apathy really amazes me !! 🙄😞
@@dingalarm Christ, don't get me started on NDT... There's not a single person on this planet that likes the sound of their own voice more than Tyson..
It's a rare gift when you have the opportunity to meet a gentleman such as this who is 100% sure he knows everything! Someone should inform this guy that science is fueled by ignorance not arrogance.
I dunno if these people are actually receiving stipends from the Government or if they have just been so well programmed by the government but regardless, what they are employing does not seem to be science.
How astute good sir, hat's off to you! I could not have put it better.
@@TwiztedHumor He's NOT 100 percent sure of what he says! That's why he's asking for SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE!
@@genxlife Yeah, and he goes about it in a biased and close minded way. That’s not scientific
"I've already made up my mind, don't bother me with the facts."
I think it's you whose mind is closed
@@gerrymcerlean8432 It's great to have an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls.
Can you please explain what is flying on those just released declassified videos from the American navy ??? and did you ever heard of Dr.Steven Greer and his many many witnesses..regular people..pilots..police...soldiers..radar operator's..people with high security clearances etc if this was a peer review I would say "go home do your homework and start all over" this is just to short minded...
@@robertokrebbers6402 Those people made an entire tv series about it. You're pretty behind.
@@kaedasonata4432 thanks for your comment..and ??? Who are "those people?"...
And I was talking about this video and what this guy says in this video..
What he said was really to easy and to shallow..what he said makes no sense,I mean let's say 90% of all
cases are easily debunked but it's the 10% of all cases which are a mistery...why didn't he talk about the 'Phoenix lights' or 'the Belgian UFO wave' or talk to people from DrGreer all those witnesses...it makes no sense to talk about the 90% that is easy debunked..but nothing on those 10% those real mysteries..and again THIS video and what he said in THIS video..and last I thought when someone serious does an serious investigation he/she keep an objective mind..something what this guy clearly didn't do/ have...again thank you for the comment and sorry for my bad English language I.m from the Netherlands...nice weekend and stay save
This would have been more convincing if he had stepped out on stage and said.....UFO's? Nothing to see here folks!, and then walked off stage.
This guy is saying “science this and science that” but he’s literally just stating opinion with out any facts or proof lol
He is also calling cases with inconclusive evidence as straight up hoaxes. This isn't a scientist who is interested proving or disproving things based on fact as a scientist would. This is a guy who's main concern is that science is always correct, and everything is a hoax because there is no proof. He is also more concerned about his opinion being correct, rather than chasing the truth through evidence and fact checking. He should say cases are inconclusive when there has been no proof of it being real or no proof of any fraudulent activity having occurred, not call them hoaxes. This shows a form of bias, which a scientist should not have.
@@Masked_Official really? So where is your TEDTalk?
@@brockstebbing8359 Probably where you keep yours.
@@Masked_Official He gave examples of proven hoaxes but did not say that all reports were hoaxes. And he DID say that all claims of alien UFOs were inconclusive because of of a lack of sufficient credible evidence.
It's a 20 minute ted talk, not a lecture. if you want evidence for claims that he's familiar with watch his other video lectures that are over an hour long.
Good luck disproving the Nimitz UFO and eye witnesses!😂
This guy clearly hasn't done any research on ufo evidence
Hes done research on debunking on cases that could be easily debunked, not the 5% of cases that couldnt get proved as fake.
Exactly that, also not to mention he's biased and not open minded.
He is what I call a lazy minded, self-proclaimed expert.
Or crop circles...
@@DysmorphicP Just because you can't disprove something doesn't make it true. It just means you can't explain or understand it.
This guy is our new J. Allen Hynek during project blue book operations...Go there and show them a weather ballon, case closed.!
Boy is this guy going to have a breakdown in the near future...
We’re almost there
How much longer?
I would take jet pilot opinion on the tic tax .they see stuff all the time.
@@casskillian the pentagon is going to release what they know in June I hope they make it true
@@ittihat1555 And 2pac was to return 2014 with the world ending 2012, we're just in an alternate universe right?
This is the kind of guy to tell children there is no Santa Clause
There's no santa?
Better to tell them the truth than to feed them lies.
This is the type of close minded science that scares me. There are so many things wrong with his so called scientific method. The first is his close minded attitude.
All magical thinkers believe real scientists are close minded.
Regular thinkers think they are close minded too. Especially the arrogant turd ones.
@@Vlasko60 I couldn’t agree more.
Dr. Michio Kaku he is not.
If it helps you sleep at night to condescend and try to explain away what makes you uncomfortable, more power to you. The rest of us will keep an open mind and move forward.
EXCELLENT!
THIS SHOULD BE POSTED ON A BILLBOARD.
It's not about being uncomfortable, it's basically facts.
Exactly!
If it helps you sleep at night to reinforce your theory with deep fake images and “breaking news” reports more power to you. The rest of us will not waste more than these 17:50 and will keep a closed mind until…..contact. I bet a thousand bucks you believe in bigfoot as well.
Thank you for this video... 👏👏
Yes but the stigma attached to this subject over the decades has scared most scientists away for studying this subject in a serious way..fear of ridicule or osterization has kept the subject in the closet.
So true, especially in the USA. Canada does not work so hard to hide information as we historically have.
This was a condescending attitude and bias towards the subject.
I don't think it is, admittedly it's heartbreaking when you want to believe, and I do. Most of us want it to be extraordinary, but it's not likely that, sadly.
And when Navy pilots see objects making 90 degree turns at 3 times the speed of sound and capture it on radar and video it's an illusion
Whatever it was. Pretty sure it weren't aliens.
@@dimitridehouck9506 No way we have tech like that. Aliens is overwhelmingly more likely.
@@gwills9337 No it isn't, Most likely it's a natural phenomena. It always is. Aliens are the very last resort we should think about.
@@dimitridehouck9506 Aliens is a natural phenomena.. just not one from our World.
@@dimitridehouck9506 and you know this because you are a navy pilot?
This is the first time I've ever been disappointed in a TED Talk
You and me both. I'm specifically looking for any scientists that will address the Navy footage that recently confirmed they were real. I'm not even saying they're aliens. I just want to know what scientists think about it. I thought this would be the guy, but he seem so out of touch. Like he's completely unaware of recent events.
Thanks for the lecture on scientific method. What about all the hundreds of eye-witness accounts by military personnel over the last seventy years backed up by radar and other observation equipment of real material UAP performing at speeds and maneuvering in ways that cannot be explained according to our current knowledge of physics? The extraterrestrial hypothesis is perfectly legitimate and has been maintained by numerous experts and scientists since the late 1940s.
there you go, just because you can't explain it therefore it's extraterrestrial. Clown.
@Demonsalan You are assuming there were actual crafts.
@Demonsalan I was referring to any "craft" that supposedly violates the laws of physics, but I also don't believe any craft that was found to be from any planet but this one.
@Demonsalan The original comment stated ".....real material UAP performing at speeds and maneuvering in ways that cannot be explained according to our current knowledge of physics?" That's what I was referring to.
@Demonsalan I agree with your last line, but is also common to hear of sudden turns at high speed. It's all meaningless to me until something is proven. That said, I understand the interest and it is likely only those interested that will ever provide credible evidence, if ever.
Sadly. He's correct. I want to believe, but yeah. Theres no real evidence.
U must've not seen the government videos released.
@@jaysoncolbert6187 that doesn’t prove aliens jackass
Bob Lazar
The most convincing testimony ive ever seen were from dozens of children of the Ariel School incident. Later as adults have the same testimony.
This guy is awesome. What a great talk. He makes a great point about how unreliable eyewitness can be, and how with more camera's were seeing less proof of UFOs
I normally don't read commentary. Truly a life changing event..I have not thought alien for a long time. I consider a race we may share this planet with. Admiral Byrd,or something along that line. A change of "venue" ,I'm sure upon witnessing. Thanku for sharing. Can't say I would. People are not generally considerate ,especially about things,that may frighten them..
.
Dr. Donald Prothero what's your take on the Nimitz Encounters?
Tell us about the Tic Tac and the 23% of the original Project Blue Book cases that had no explanation?
So things with no explaining means aliens. That’s not how science works. And sure there is many many manyyyy videos debunking the “ tic tac” but I’m sure you wouldnt know because most of you are the ones that are actually bias and never try to find any other explanations before going to your favourite ufo alien CZcams first
I can understand the need for phenomenon to be replicable, to have controls and peer-review in laboratory science and in many other aspects of scientific investigation. Yet with a huge deal of phenomena this isn't possible. And especially with something as consequential as the possibility that alien life might be visiting our planet, needing it to be replicable and to be able to have controls on it seems absurd! He misrepresents a lot of the information that he delivers and makes conclusions that are wildly biased and seem only to put this subject into a neat box 'lets just call it all a hoax'. The UFO phenomenon is a real phenomenon: there are consistent accounts and reports all over the globe from reputable sources of crafts defying our conventional ideas of what is possible, given our current understanding of physics; The abduction phenomenon is a real phenomenon: you only have to read the work of Dr. David Jacobs and Dr. Karla Turner to see the same thing - there are consistent accounts of what these aliens look like, what they do and how they do things from around the world that give this phenomenon a basis of validity. People are experiencing the same thing. Please look into this seriously and don't take this mindless approach based on our current assumptions of whats possible. Read the literature and make your own mind up! A couple of great books are: 'Alien Agenda' by Jim Marrs and 'Walking among Us' by Dr. David Jacobs - I'd also encourage anyone looking into this seriously to read the Allies of Humanity Briefings which are online here (alliesOfHumanity(dot)org).
"I can understand the need for phenomenon to be replicable, to have controls and peer-review in laboratory science and in many other aspects of scientific investigation. Yet with a huge deal of phenomena this isn't possible. And especially with something as consequential as the possibility that alien life might be visiting our planet, needing it to be replicable and to be able to have controls on it seems absurd!"
The problem with this faulty reasoning of yours is that you can replace "alien life" with a number of other irrational ideas and the footage you are referring to becomes evidence for every single one of them: ghosts, gods, souls, demons, inter-dimensional beings, angels, humans from the future, proof we live in a simulation, you name it. The proof will always be in your mind, not in the facts.
And since it is impossible based on the evidence to determine which of the irrational proposition is potentially the right one, we have to trust a rigorous objective evidence-based process according to which all of the above, including the alien hypothesis, is simply, as things stand, unsupported by the evidence. That doesn't mean it can't change!
"The UFO phenomenon is a real phenomenon: there are consistent accounts and reports all over the globe from reputable sources of crafts defying our conventional ideas of what is possible, given our current understanding of physics"
You can replace UFO by any gods or religion. There also are also billions of consistent accounts of what God looks like. Half of the world seem to agree that He is one dude (monotheism). Does that in any way, shape or form prove that gods are real? Why not? Does the probability that he is indeed one dude, as opposed to many dudes, increase the more people defend it?
There are consistent account by schizophrenic people of what their delusions entail... So what? This is why anecdotal evidence CANNOT be considered evidence, ever. Why? Because based on it, one can prove literally anything. What about spirits and angels? And how come son many people think they are Jesus Christ? There must be a real phenomenon of Jesus Christ related reincarnations, right? No there isn't, no matter how many billion of people claim the opposite.
"The abduction phenomenon is a real phenomenon: you only have to read the work of Dr. David Jacobs and Dr. Karla Turner to see the same thing"
Replace abduction with "astral projection" or "reincarnation" or "divination"... now what? Surely i can also provide a few PhD's who research, extensively write about and defend the idea.
Look, this is all very bad epistemology like I keep repeating, it's misunderstanding what evidence is and it's also being wilfully unaware of all the known biases and mental illusions humans are known to be prone to. It's all documented and fascinating, too bad you guys prefer to believe in aliens.
I actually agree with you on this, this video sucked and was just very biased and bad information.
In a nutshell, UFO does not equate space alien. We need to start using a new term for these 'unidentified' or unidentifiable flying objects because people always associate them with little green men.
So much for scientists being 'objective'...!!!!
Damn his dad went to area 51 and didn't see alien craft!???!! Man they must be fake cuz one guy says he didn't see something
He worked there for decades.
@@NuntiusLegis yes because anyone who works there has access to the whole facility right? Thats how top secret works....
This same logic could be applied to alien sightings I think. If you're saying we shouldn't trust his information because he personally didn't see aliens you would also have to say that just because someone personally saw an alien it doesn't mean it's actually aliens.
@@gavinperch9413
No that doesn't apply. The point I'm making is that one person's lack of experience doesn't in itself doesnt negate others experiences.
@@jacobkobald1753 right which means that ideally neither can be trusted with their experience or they can both be trusted. In which case means more information aside from personal experience is needed to decide who is telling the truth.
"In this talk, he unravels the truth behind the UFO phenomenon." What a pretentious (and non scientific) statement.
It’s actually very true, you can look up the links between cryptids, dragons, and aliens to the world culture and amount of information at the time if you really care to let something get through your thick, non-scientific skull
@@sheildingepicness ate you saying there were not dragons that spit fire
@@sheildingepicness there is trends that are set by books or entertainment varities. But there are stories of lights in skies doing odd things before flight by man was even invented and before science fiction. We just called it religion or mythology then. But there are stories going back a very amount of time. So you cannot use his excuses in that matter. There's still plenty of sightings that have no correlation with science fiction or entertainment influence. There's a reason why a large number of scientists believe in UFO's and extraterrestrial life. And their scientific knowledge are more closely related to the subject.
This guy is right, and so is David Fravor.
This lecture has become dated since the DOD disclosure of UAP’s during the Nimitz Incident and David Fravor coming forward. Will be interesting to see how things unfold from here..
There is Tons of evidence, even Physical Evidence (Yes Radar data is physical evidence).
Other physical evidence as well like lending place of a ufo and the burnt place it left behind..
IMO - even though there is some truly elaborate hoaxed videos out there, I highly doubt millions of witnesses have the capability to hoax a video. Thus, camera footage, which is also technically "scientific evidence" because camera and video technology had originated through scientific study and production, is just as valid and repeated numerous times to meet scientific evidence. The ignorance that is shown toward these valid points, just shows the ignorance certain people reside in.
@@ZosoRocks1 it is changing fast.... And really soon ufo and aliens will be mainstream....
If you have watched Avangers end game.... There when Tony is dead and the villain is defeated... Tony gives a speech.... That says it all about disclosure...
Inexplicably high radiation levels at landing sights and of abductees...
We also have scientific evidence of how the grain stalks have "exploded" or "changed" - from a possible intense heat source and thus, a much different configuration is the result. Much more factual than what this guy promotes by "just stomping on them with a board and boots". IMO - this so-called degreed elite has not done any investigation and is just voicing his own and personal opinion based in unfounded hearsay. Sad.
I have ONE QUESTION for all of you flying saucer and alien abduction believers:
What would it take for you to no longer believe?
nothing
Actual evidence that suggests they don't exist. So far it's mathematically likely that they do exist. So there's more proof that they exist than there is that they don't exist.
An alternative explanation .
@@Fashion_point_ I.E.A. is utilizing this..
“What would it take to change his mind? If the answer is 'there isn't anything' then you're wasting your time.”
They are saying there are better things for them to do than to participate in exchange of saliva spraying with people who are broken in the head. And.. I agree with them.
@@lhd7105 what the Fcuck 😂
Explain the released UFO videos by the US Navy, Mr. Sceptic!!!!
UFO does not mean alien spacecraft. It means unidentified flying object. If you have evidence that they are actually aliens, then present it.
What about the navy fighter pilots that have in video moving at 5000 mph making turns that nothing we know of can do
I know there’s a lot of BS about aliens and UFOs but how does this dude know with certainty what’s out in the universe?
Simple, he doesn't
Where did he say he did?
Would love to see this guy's face when he finds out the truth...not to mention shermers...😎
"Honey, there's a UFO. Quick, grab the worst camera you can find."
Im confident in real UFos, but applaud the Skeptics, they are our best friends, they are not the Enemy and the only Quality Control we have.
Progress is 99% falsifying hypothesis. Eventually the Truth will be known and skepticism will have helped the Truth
Flat earthers should get this guy to prove their theory
The only thing this guy proved is he’s frightened of the truth.
The new documentary THE PHENOMENON is vewy compelling
It's a good flick and a great primer for the uninitiated. However, I didn't get a lot out of it that was new to me.
I'd love to see a documentary that deals strictly with the alien agenda. Why are they observing us? Ate they actually abducting humans and if so, why? Did they create us? Are they interdemensional? Are they from the future? Etc. There is so much meat left on the alien/UFO bone besides "Do they exist?"
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
No mention of commander David Fravor and Ryan Graves
there is still a lot to discover for him
I haven’t even watched this yet & I already know he won’t say a damn thing of interest until the gov confirms it first. Aren’t scientist supposed to do the research?!
The scientific method is inadequate when it comes to UFOs because you can't replicate UFO sightings for experimentation.
you're so right - it's the quantum flux generated by the aliens when the fart that have given the rest of you a fact-resistant virus - you're nothing but a bunch of perverts who enjoy getting probed - that is so sick
I agree with the approach he's taking but I was looking for someone to go over specific videos, like ones released by the military. I've seen claims that the UFO's in these videos seem to be doing things that humans don't, at least publicly, have the ability to do. I want math either confirming or denying these claims.
Check Chris Letho channel
I think their heads are so far up their own a**es that they can't even do that, bc it would hurt their egos.
It speaks volumes that Dr. Mack almost lost his job at Harvard for researching the Ariel School Incident. If it weren't for a Rockefeller involved, he probably would've been let go.
I don't think you could understand this "math" you speak of
Great take on what people often overlook about humanity and our history
Literally overlooking a plethora of historical evidence, which includes physical evidence.
Someone should explain to this poor man that life from other planets is not supernatural or paranormal.
He didn't say it was. He was equating beliefs on unproven phenomena that all magical thinkers share.
One needs to be skeptical of skepticism too!
This is debatable
Now more than ever, we need to hear this.
After researching this subject for long time, I keep comeback to this guy to brainwash me so I have a brand new brain to start researching again.
Well played ! I hope you know aliens exist
Even when you know alien life exist. It's beyond word scary the first time. Sobering moment
After reading through a good number of comments I'm reminded of a famous saying .... 100 cups of weak coffee all poured together does not make strong coffee.
I’ll add this. This man infers that the Navy is lying, the media is lying... in the usual debunker’s own terms, isn’t that called... CONSPIRACY THEORY? 😂 Ted should flag this!
Mr. Prothero is way behind the conversation. Update: We're not asking if they exist, we're asking where they're from.
Maybe you are asking that - I'm not.
Gerry McErlean so what are you asking? Because as an intelligent person the only question should be are we alone.
Joe Rohan should interview this dude.
He should talk to our retired minister of defense in Canada.
Donald Prothero, expert in geology, field of expertise: sticking his head in the sand
😂😂😂
Dr Prothero has all the knowledge necessary to speak on this topic. He's a professional scientist. I did not hear him claim that UFOs are not alien. What I did hear him say was that there was not enough evidence to support this hypothesis. He didn't say it was the idea was false, just that it hasn't been shown to be true. You really need to remove your earplugs and try to hear what people 'actually' say, not what you 'think' they say.
@@gerrymcerlean8432 he purposefully admitted key arguments and information, like project blue books 23% of sightings that baffled the team, and videos and photos that clearly depict a UFO. I’m not one to agree with any hypothesis concerning UFO’s, I just know that UFO’s are a truly unexplainable phenomenon.
Prothero's field is Mammalian paleontology. And he's an expert in UFOs, too?
he is an expert in the scientific method... he can't be an expert of something that does not exist - only you can do that
@@astroboy7712 UFOs do indeed exist. the question is, what are they?
@@darkworld5026 A figment of YOUR imagination!
@@astroboy7712 UFO sightings and encounters have doubled in the past decade, including footage released by the Pentagon. Don't you watch the news? I guess the nuclear armed United States Navy must be imagining those unidentified aerial craft that are buzzing their fighters?
@@darkworld5026 Sorry man, I have a PhD in STEM - I don't do bs - but go ahead and knock yourself out - nanoo nanoo and look long into my prostrate!
Tic tac? Buy it in the store 🤣
His dad was probably a janitor there that's why
When I was a teen I seen a silver cigar shaped object flying at high speed in the sky twice. Recently I was out with my binoculars stargazing and seen what looked like a star moving at incredibly high speed across the sky doing several ninety degree turns without slowing down. It would hover for a moment in once spot and take off again. I wasn't the only one witnessing this spectacle as my friend was with me that night and he was seeing the same thing through his binoculars.
I've woken up several times with geometric bruises on me, my wife as well.
I'm not buying into what this man is preaching.
I live in rural Washington State and have been seeing pinpoints of lights doing strange things for going on for about six years now. In fact, I've had so many sightings, they're too numerous to mention here. But yeah, something is going on in our skies (other than manmade craft activity).
Oh dear. This man is a scientist? I guess radar footage accompanied by eye witness accounts from multiple people trusted to fly planes with Nukes strapped to them isn't credible evidence. ...
He actually mentioned a weather balloon...hahaha WTAF
It is a solid analysis of our modern cultural attraction to UFO but what is not included the existing depictions of ancient civilisations that do not use imagery of angels and devils.
There's something to be said with the effect of art has to our society. If there are patterns they need to examined.
Just remember the art originated from personal experiences. Witnesses of UFO's and ppl experiencing abduction came before the art.
Considering the wastness of time and space the universe is made of it is totally unreasonable to believe that aliens are on the same speck in the universe at the same blink of time as we are.
If at all - Fermi Paradox - sure, I love to have company - I get frustrated to think that after 13.77 Billion years "evolution" in the universe has produced us as the most "intelligent" species in space and time - BUT well, we do NOT have any other data points... so it is not possible to setup any probability either way.
Really? What if we were some alien's science fair project? Do you think they would be here then?
@@trombone113 Well my hat's off to you Sir; you do have me at a disadvange though; having a PhD in STEM requires me to use critical thinking, to evaluate the EVIDENCE and not to be given to bias or illustions of "what ifs" - it must be nice to be you, to enjoy the perfect vacuum between the Ears - to muse about 2 inch pink elephants with wings flying Elvis Presley to a planet far away for a concert of a race that has forgone the scientific method for tabloid headlines - congratulations!
you may not use the word "unREASONABLE" - there are no data points whatsoever - ZERO, ZILCH , NADA, NIENTE, - and as such you may not draw any scientific conclusions - you may howevver, may whatever assumptions your flight of fancy and bias may take you to - they will hold as much weight as the vacuum in your skull
Thank you so much Donald, after watching Prime Video about two "docu"s about unidentified flying objects I felt queasy about what was being served me, like it was too convenient. It was the same feeling after watching "Forks over Knives". So I started looking for a second opinion about these claims, more importantly, I was hoping that second opinions would be well sourced, so that we can all see for ourselves all of these counter statements substantiated. I think regardless of whoever says what, having sources and facts to back up the assertions is best.
So I am glad to have found your talk on TEDx. I wish you the best, for all the hard, and unthanked, work of chasing after the truth, in a scientific way. I hope all talks and presentations such as this are provided by easy clickable sources so that everyone can learn more. I believe I would remain undecided on the topic of UFOs until facts and science edumacate me one way or another. I hope that I am not alone in this.
You're alone.
@@davidvincent6149 Not a big fan of well sourced, peer reviewed facts?
Looks like your his only friend
@@philwelling7172 this thread is so dead, why are you necro'ing it? is there something worth discussing? i don't even remember what we are talking about
@@lhd7105 sorry, just felt compelled to say something about this Bozo
You can’t explain what my dad, his siblings and his parents saw in Southern Africa 60yrs ago. A flying saucer, they were ridiculed by they’re families for speaking about it, that they just stopped because of the stigma.
This makes me sad.
It's good to see the scientific community taking a stance and it's hard to argue with the scientific method. That said, this guy's stance seems to be "Just believe whatever the government tells you to believe.". I mean FOIA? Really? Come now.
So when they don't release documents, they're hiding something and when they do, they're hiding something.
@@Vlasko60 That's not the point I was making. My point is a FOIA whether fulfilled or not have nothing to do with the scientific method.
@@blindspotspotter.2352 Fair enough.
I'm not taking the bulk of the UFO sightings as realistic but from my own experience I have no doubt something exists. That said the lecture style was familiar and you see it a lot now with debunkers. Sound logic but heavily flavoured with an equally staged preconceived perspective more often than not media generated. See it a lot of it these days, your being told what to think.
I feel that this guy is an alien himself
Excellent use of Tsukolos meme! What's this guy's day job?
in the whole known universe we are the only planet with life......then is it so hard to understand that on this whole planet of people only ONE person could have an alien entity?
I was getting so frustrated watching this guy, and glad to see from the comments I am not alone
LOOK AT THE RATIO OF LIKES TO DISLIKES!!!!!!!! This is the only video I've ever seen that has more dislikes than likes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Science is not about making anybody glad or less frustrated.
Yep there’s a bunch of idiots just like you down here.
@@markanthony4546 I've reported you to CZcams for bullying and harassment.
@@davidvincent6149 and I’ve reported you for spreading misinformation. If you can’t handle other’s opinions then I feel sad for you.
Before he even said anything I knew it was all going to go horribly wrong :( and then when he starting speaking my fears were confirmed :( He will live to regret this video :(
but the Roswell incident happened in 47, so how do you explain the "grey alien" theory with media from the 50's and 60's?
I think a vast majority of what he says is spot-on. The main topic at issue here is how to think critically, and not jump to a conclusion that you like simply because you don't have the means or time or skills to analyze it out. I stumbled on the last part though, wherein he brought up the Roswell story, he made a few mistakes. For one, the photos of materials being held in that picture were not the object that crashed. Given that the mogul project was top secret, and that the recovery of the materials (across more than one location, apparently) was a massive project with a lot of military personnel on site, it's absurd to even suggest that they would release pictures of the actual materials to the press. Those photos were a cover story, along with the headline. Secondly, the original report in the Roswell Daily Record had the headline "RAAF Captures Flying Saucer On Ranch in Roswell Region", a statement that was later revoked with a cover story about a weather balloon (which was what was pictured). While the incident was forgotten for many years is largely correct, but it was that "flying saucer" newspaper report that attracted Stanton Friedman, a nuclear physicist, to dig into the story years later and realize that the "weather balloon" item was a cover-up (which it was). But his interviews of eye witnesses confirmed to him the original statement, not the cover-up story. Those eye witness accounts from people who were on the scene therefore might fall into the niche that Dr. Prothero categorizes as being unreliable simply on the basis that human psychology and memory gets in the way. But his statement is completely wrong here: "UFO authors revived it in a novel in 1978 and a whole industry grew up with no original data sources, no eye witnesses, it was all made up from thin air." Stanton Friedman is the "UFO author" to which he refers, who did not write a "novel," and there were many eye witnesses he discovered starting with Jesse Marcel, and it was not all made up from "thin air." While it still can be argued that there was no actual "saucer" - as Marcel states - his description of what he found does not ring of "flying saucer" it rings of what we now know as Mogul. But it seems to me that Dr. Prothero did not do any homework into those who made the claims, and did not read Friedman himself, perhaps because he feels it's a waste of his time. He seems to have only consumed the "skeptical inquirer" conclusions and echoed the sentiments without looking deeper into it. Similarly, I'm not aware of the Betty & Barney Hill incident being debunked as a hoax. I am not a big fan of abduction stories in general, but a "hoax" implies it's a foregone conclusion. (Crop circles are a foregone conclusion - they are a hoax. But the Betty & Barney Hill incident? Did they admit to it being a hoax?) My point is that we need to be careful that a skeptic can be guilty of the exact same thing that a believer can be guilty of: to jump to a conclusion based on a predisposed belief. The burden of proof is on the one who makes the statement, absolutely. But if they are unable to prove it, you cannot CONCLUDE that it's false. It needs to remain inconclusive.
I wonder how much the CIA paid this guy.
🤔 damnnn
$83,987
very valid point. I was wondering the same thing. He is definitely a misinformation agent
@@rockroll7218 might be rite u no y he repeats that 50 000 flying only night all the time over&, over again that's y I clicked video seeing his face &he's on bout the exact flying at night.job
Many a pilot, as well as astronauts, some with degrees in aerospace engineering and other relevant fields, have witnessed high performance craft doing things that seem physically impossible with the best of human technology. Dismiss them if you will, but many of us care about what they have to say.
I have also experienced some unexplainable things in the sky. Ether or it’s scary anyways!
This is gonna age like milk