Desmos vs. Malware - Part 1
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
- Find out who will win the epic battle between Desmos combined with me, against some of the craziest malwares out there.
0:00 Intro
0:56 Executing the malware
1:18 First Impressions
2:33 Visiting Websites
3:03 My Beloved Pi
3:54 First Signs of Death
4:27 Naive Solution
4:57 ctfmon.exe
5:56 Slow As AAAAA
6:35 ]wZn1Kes.sjorage.hll,-w51
6:56 The Demise
7:21 Outro
#galliumgonzollium #malware #desmos #vs #galliums - Zábava
6:28 *you saw nothing-*
AAAAAAAAAA
Lmaooo love how freakin bad regfucc looks when it's starts xD
And I hope your PC is ok now!!
nice that you include pi and tau, as a pi-and-tau-ist.
sure, tau is more elegant, but pi works better for calculating the areas of things and is more fun to say. there should also be a 2tau/3 constant for spheres.
pau?
@@Almondz_ idk maybe i'd call it sigma (σ) for ancient greek sphaira, which was the "volume-constant" symbol in the tau manifesto. if that's too commonly used then i'd use the variant of sigma (ς) instead
@@notwithouttext It is surely a surprise when one who mentions tau finds it is not know by some.
@@Almondz_ yeah, tau is both underrated and overrated at the same time. tau is useful for turning angles into lengths, but pi is useful for turning angles into areas and easily calculating the circumference with a physical object. yes, the area formula ultimately comes from 1/2(tau)(r^2), which is better for math, but actually using the area formula has pi useful, and sigma useful as well. so then it's
tau - 1D
pi - 2D
sigma (2tau/3) - 3D
as for tau causing ambiguity, that can easily be solved by adding a center subscript circle, like τ̥.
so basically, pi is still useful while being mathematically wrong. besides, euler found use for both tau, pi, and lambda (half pi, quarter tau). i will say that e^(tau i) = 1 + 0i is more elegant than e^(pi i) + 1 = 0, because the classic one says "the value plus one is zero", which hides the ugly -1 value. some might say that e^(pi i) = -1 is more mind blowing and intriguing, but e^(tau i) = 1 explains why the natural logarithm can loop by tau i.
@@notwithouttext Indeed, euler used both, it is really what is easist in any such situatiobn. Though knowing what tau is quite useful. Also wow I did not know that, with the imaginary numbers, I have not quite studied them yet. Do you perhaps have discord?
bad ending
you went from being excited to trash the system to being sad that you can't get Desmos back xD
HAHAHA yes