ദൈവത്തിന്റെ വെളിപാടും വിശ്വാസികളുടെ കഷ്ടപ്പാടും | Pretheesh
Vložit
- čas přidán 30. 12. 2022
- യുക്തിവാദി സംഘത്തിന്റെ ആഭിമുഖ്യത്തിൽ 18 .12.2022 ന്
മലപ്പുറം ടൗൺ ഹാളിൽ സംഘടിപ്പിച്ച "സ്വതന്ത്ര ലോകം 2022 "ൽ പ്രതീഷ് നടത്തിയ പ്രഭാഷണം "ദൈവത്തിന്റെ വെളിപാടും വിശ്വാസികളുടെ കഷ്ടപ്പാടും"
യുക്തിവാദികളിൽ നിന്നു ദൈവങ്ങളേയും, ദൈവദൂതർമാരേയും സംരക്ഷിക്കാൻ (കാത്തുകൊള്ളാൻ) വേണ്ടി വിശ്വാസികൾ വളരേ കഷ്ടപ്പെടുന്നുണ്ട്,,,,,പ്യാവം വിശ്വാസികൾ,,,,!!! ഈ സോഷ്യൽ മീഡിയ കണ്ടുപിടിച്ചവൻ്റെ തല വെട്ടതെ വിട്ടതിൽ തികച്ചും നിരാശ,,,,,!!!!
ശരിയായ മാപ്പ് തരുന്നതും കൂടുതൽ അറിവും വിവരവും ഉള്ളത് ദൈവത്തെക്കാൾ ഗൂഗിളിനാണ് ഗൂഗിളിനെ നമുക്ക് മാറ്റി നിർത്താനോ അവഗണിക്കാനോ പറ്റില്ല സൊ അൽഹംദുഗൂഗിൾ 🙏
32ബില്യൺ(3200 കോടി ) പ്രകാശ വര്ഷം ദൂരത്താണ് ഇതുവരകണ്ടത്തിയതിൽ ഭൂമിയിൽ നിന്ന്നും ഏറ്റവും അകലെയുള്ള ഗാലക്സി;
പ്രകാശം ഒരു സെക്കൻഡിൽ സഞ്ചരിക്കുന്ന ദൂരം ഏതാണ്ട് 3 ലക്ഷം കിലോമീറ്റര് ആണ് ;
3200കോടി വര്ഷം പ്രകാശം സഞ്ചരിച്ചാലുള്ള ദൂരം ;( ഇത്രയും വർഷത്തിൽ എത്ര സെക്കൻഡുകൾ ഉണ്ടോ അതിന്റെ 3 ലക്ഷം ഇരട്ടി കിലോമീറ്റർ ദൂരം )
അതായതു നമ്മുടെ ചിന്തക്കോ യുക്തിക്കോ ബുദ്ധിക്കോ അപ്പുറത്താണ് ഈ ദൂരവും കാലവും അതുപോലെ ദൈവത്തെയും നമ്മുടെ കേവല യുക്തികൊണ്ടോ ബുദ്ധികുണ്ടോ അളക്കാൻ കഴിയില്ല
അപ്പോൾ പിന്നെ ട്രില്ല്യൺ ട്രില്ല്യൺ (ലക്ഷം ലക്ഷം കോടി ) പ്രകാശവര്ഷങ്ങള്ക് അപ്പുറത്തു ആകാശ ഗംഗകൾ താണ്ടി ഒരു ദൈവം ഉണ്ടാകാനുള്ള സാധ്യതയില്ലേ ??????????????.
അതായതു ഈ പ്രപഞ്ചത്തിനു പുറത്തു(universe) അതിനെ ചൂഴ്ന്നു നിൽക്കുന്ന ഒരു ബ്രഹ്മാണ്ഡ ശക്തി(Supreme power) ഉണ്ടാവാൻ സാധ്യതയില്ല ???
അല്ലെങ്കിൽ യുക്തിവാദികളോട് ചോദിക്കട്ടെ ദൈവം ഇല്ലാത്തതിന് തെളിവെന്ത് ?
ഭൂമിയിലെ ഓരോ അണുവിലും ന്യൂക്ലിയസ് കേന്ദ്രികരിച്ചു ഇലക്ട്രോണുകൾ ഭ്രമണംവും പരിക്രമണവും പ്രദക്ഷിണവു ചെയ്യുന്നു;ചന്ദ്രൻ ഭൂമിയെ കേന്ദ്രികരിച്ചു ചുറ്റുന്നു ,ഭൂമി സൂര്യനെ കേന്ദ്രികരിച്ചു ചുറ്റുന്നു സൗരയൂഥം(solar system) ഉൾപ്പെടെ 400 ബില്യൺ നക്ഷത്രങ്ങളുടയും 100 ബില്യൺ ഗ്രഹങ്ങളുടയും ഗാലക്സി ആയ മില്കിവേയും (milkyway ) മറ്റു
കോടാനു കോടി പ്രകാശ വർഷങ്ങൾ അപ്പുറത്തുള്ള നക്ഷത്രങ്ങൾ ,ഗ്രഹങ്ങൾ ,എല്ലാം കൂടിച്ചേരുന്ന കോടിക്കണക്കിനു ഗാലക്സികൾ ,ക്ഷീരപഥങ്ങൾ ,നബൂലകൾ എല്ലാം എന്ത് കേന്ദ്രികരിച്ചു ആകും പ്രദക്ഷിണം ചെയ്യുന്നത് ????
അല്ലാഹുവിന്റെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ സൃഷ്ടിയായ അർഷിനെ(throne of god ) കേന്ദ്രികരിച്ചല്ലേ ???
പ്രപഞ്ചത്തിലെ എല്ലാ ചരാചരങ്ങളും അല്ലാഹുവിനു സൂജൂദ് ചെയ്യുന്നു എന്ന് ഖുർആൻ പറയുന്നു
പരിശുദ്ധ കഅബാലയം അർശിന്‌ നേരെ ആയതുകൊണ്ടാണല്ലോ മുസ്ലിങ്ങൾ കഅബക്ക് ചുറ്റും പ്രദക്ഷിണം ചെയ്യുന്നതും കഅബ ദിശയാക്കി /കേന്ദ്രികരിച്ചു അഞ്ചു നേരം നിസ്കരിക്കുന്നതും
പുതിയ നിരീക്ഷണങ്ങൾ പ്രകാരം 2 ട്രില്ല്യൻ ഗാലക്സികൾ ഉണ്ടന്ന് കണക്കാക്കുന്നു
ഖുറാനിൽ പറയുന്ന ഏഴു ആകാശങ്ങളിൽ ആദ്യത്തേതിലെ കാര്യം മാത്രമാണ് ഈ പറഞ്ഞത്
അപ്പോൾ പിന്നെ പ്രപഞ്ചത്തിലെഏറ്റവം വലിയ സൃഷ്ടിയായ അര്ശിന്റെ (throne of god ) വലിപ്പത്തെ കുറിച്ച ചിന്തിച്ചു നോക്കൂ ദൈവത്തിന്റെ വലിപ്പത്തെ കുറിച്ചും കഴിവിനെ കുറച്ചു ചിന്തിച്ചു നോക്കൂ
ജന്തു ലോകവും സസ്യ ലോകവും ഇത്ര വിദഗ്ദ്ധമായി സംവിദാനിച്ചതു ആരാണ് ,എല്ലാം തനിയെ ഉണ്ടായി എന്നുപറയുന്നത് ശാസ്ത്രീയമോ ?
ഇതിനെല്ലാം ഒരു പ്രൊഡ്യൂസർ കം ഡയറക്ടർ വേണമെന്നത് സാമാന്യ യുക്തിയെല്ലേ ?
മൈക്രോസ്കോപ്പിലൂടെയോ ടെലിസ്കോപ്പിലിടായോ ദൈവത്തിനെ കാണാൻ കഴിയില്ല മറിച്ചു അതിലൂടെ കാണാൻ കഴിയുന്ന കോടാനകോടി സൂക്ഷ്മ ജീവികളിലെയും കോടാനകോടി ഗ്രഹങ്ങളിലൂടയും ദൈവത്തിന്റെ അപാരത കണ്ടത്തണം അങ്ങനെയാണ് ദൈവത്തിന്റെ അസ്ഥിവത്വം കണ്ടത്തേണ്ടത്
ദൈവം ഉള്ളതിന് ശാസ്ത്രീയ തെളിവ് വേണം എന്ന് പറയുന്നത് പരീക്ഷക്ക് കോപ്പിയടിക്കാൻ തുണ്ടു വേണം എന്ന് പറയുന്നത് പോലെയാണ് അപ്പോൾപിന്നെ ജീവിതമാകുന്ന പരീക്ഷക്ക് എന്ത് പ്രസക്തിയാണുള്ളത് ? ;ജീവിതമാകുന്ന പരീക്ഷയിലെ ചോദ്യങ്ങളാണ് , വിശപ്പ് ,ദാഹം കാമം ,രോഗങ്ങൾ , ദുരന്തങ്ങൾ ,പകർച്ച വ്യാധികൾ, അപകടങ്ങൾ ,ദാരിദ്ര്യം ,കുലമഹിമ,സമ്പന്നത ,യുദ്ധങ്ങൾ ,പലായനം .ആരോഗ്യം, അനാരോഗ്യം, സൗന്ദര്യം ,വൈരൂപ്യം ഉയർച്ച താഴ്ച്ച ,പ്രതിസന്ധികൾ ......
മനുഷ്യന് മാത്രം എന്തുകൊണ്ട് സംസ്കാരം,ഭാഷ, യുക്തി ,വിവേകം ,ബുദ്ധി എന്നിവ ഉണ്ടായി; ഭൂമിയിലെ മറ്റൊരു ജീവിക്കും ഇങ്ങനെ ഇല്ലാതെ പോയി,????
അവനു മാത്രമനോ ആദ്മാവ് ഉള്ളത് ?????
,അവൻ ഉൽകൃഷ്ടൻ ആയതു കൊണ്ടാണോ ???? ?
അവന്റെ ജീവിത നിയോഗം(purpose of life)എന്ത്?
മരണത്തിനു ശേഷം എന്ത് സംഭവിക്കും ????
തീർച്ചയായും മാനവികമായ ഒരു ലോകം ഉണ്ടാവേണ്ടാതെല്ലേ,ശരിയും തെറ്റും നമയും തിന്മയും തിരിച്ചറിയാനുള്ള വിവേകവും ബുദ്ധിയും മനുഷ്യനുണ്ടങ്കിൽ അവന്റെ ഓരോ പ്രവൃത്തിയും ചോദ്യം ചെയ്യുന്ന (accountability)ഒരു വിചാരണ (മഹ്ശറ ) ഉണ്ടാവേണ്ടതല്ലെ ???
അകാലത്തിൽ മരണപ്പെടുന്ന കുട്ടികൾ ,വികലങ്ങേര്,രോഗികൾ എന്നിവർക്കു ആര് നീതി കൊടുക്കും ??
നീതികിട്ടാതെ മരിക്കുന്ന ലക്ഷകനുക്കിനു ജീവികൾക്ക് ആര് നീതി നൽകും ???
ലക്ഷകനുക്കിനു ജങ്ങളെ കൂട്ടക്കൊല ചെയ്ത ഹിൽറ്ററും മുസോളിനും സ്റ്റാൻലിനും ശിക്കപ്പെടാനും ഒരു വിചാരണ (മഹ്ശറ)വേണ്ടതല്ലേ ? ???
ഇതിനുള്ള ഉത്തരം ഇസ്ലാമിൽ നിന്നും ലഭിക്കും
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]
.
ഒരു കാര്യം ഉറപ്പാണ് മതങ്ങൾ പറയുന്ന ദൈവങ്ങൾ യഥാർത്ത ദൈവങ്ങളല്ല
@@mohdsulaiman-rightthinker7282 എല്ലാത്തിനും പിന്നിൽ ഒരാളെ വേണം. അപ്പൊ ദൈവത്തിന് പിന്നിലും ഒരു ശക്തി വേണ്ടേ ആ ശക്തിക്ക് രൂപം ഉണ്ടാകണ്ടേ. ഏത് രൂപമാണെന്ന് ഒന്ന് സങ്കല്പിക്കൂ
@@mohdsulaiman-rightthinker7282 czcams.com/video/CCuj_OjdlBY/video.html
മാനവ രാശിയ്ക്കു എളുപ്പത്തിൽ മനസ്സിലാവാൻ ലളിതമായ ഭാഷയിൽ ഇറക്കിയ ഗ്രന്ഥം ! അതിൽ വിശ്വസിയ്ക്കുന്നവർക്ക് പൊലും ഇതുവരെ മനസിലായിട്ടില്ല 😂..superb presentation ❤
Excellent Presentation 👏
പ്രതീഷ് വളർന്നു വരുന്ന താരം
Keep it up
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]...
ശരിയാണ്, presentation OK.
നമ്മുടെ adv ആളൂര്‍ നെ പോലെ അല്ലേ?
നമ്മുടെ കുഞ്ചന്‍ നമ്പ്യാര്‍ പറഞ്ഞത് പോലെ, ദീപം സ്തംഭം മഹാശ്ചര്യം നമുക്കും കിട്ടണം പണം 😄
വ്യക്തമാണ്, നമിക്കുന്നു സർ
Excellent debut, debut, dear Pratish. I'm damn sure, you have to play a big role in the advancement of free thinking movement in Kerala in the times to come.
100%
വ്യത്യസ്തമായ ഒരു പ്രസന്റേഷൻ ❤️
Super 👍 പെട്ടെന്നു തീർന്നപോലെ തോന്നി,
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131].
...
ബ്രോ.. വ്യൂവേഴ്സ് കൂടുന്നതിൽ അല്ല കാര്യം.. പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങളിലാണ്... അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങൾ!!! കൂടുതൽ പ്രസന്റേഷൻ പ്രതീക്ഷിക്കുന്നു..
Pratheesh vamadevan😍
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131].....
Great presentation. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131].
.
.
കൊള്ളാം, നന്നായിട്ടുണ്ട്, കൂടുതൽ പ്രതീക്ഷിക്കുന്നു. 🙋
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]
.
@@jobinkoshy8197 എന്താ കാര്യം?
Reductio guy ❤️
Wow. അടിപൊളി.
Pratheeesh polichu..... Sathyam paranjal ith announce cheythapo njn vijarichu... Full philosophical terms um karyanglokke ayiii chilappo sadaranakark manasilkaatha reethiyilayi pooum nnn..... But ith polichu simple ayiiii aarkum manasilavana reethiyil ellavarilekkum ethunna tharathil cheythu.... Poliiii..... Last auto de 4 vari... Ath theeeeyaarnnu.... Thalachorinte baravum koodi perandi vanna oru pavam mrugam.. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]....
@@jobinkoshy8197 സുഹൃത്തേ, എനിക്ക് ഇഷ്ടമുള്ള ഒരു വിഷയം ആയതുകൊണ്ട് വായിക്കുന്നു.
എന്നാലും ഇത്രയും നീളമുള്ള താങ്കളുടെ comment മനസ്സിലാക്കാൻ ബുദ്ധിമുട്ടാണ്,. അതുകൊണ്ട്‌ ഒന്ന് ചെറുതായി പറയാമോ.
ഞാൻ യേശുവില്‍ വിശ്വസിക്കുന്നു, including resurrection.
എനിക്ക് ക്രിസ്തുവിന്റെ ആശയം, സുവിശേഷത്തില്‍ നിന്നാണ്, യുക്തിക്ക് ചേരുന്നത്. അതും യോഹന്നാന്റെ സുവിശേഷം. പിന്നീട് മറ്റ് മൂന്ന് സുവിശേഷവും അതിലെ യേശുവിന്റെ ആശയവും നല്ലതായി കണ്ടു. പുതിയ നിയമത്തില്‍ പോലും "revelation" എന്നത് പോലും എനിക്ക് accept ചെയ്യാൻ കഴിയുന്നില്ല എന്നത് വേറെ ഒരു സത്യം.
എനിക്ക് സത്യത്തിന് contradict ചെയ്യുന്ന എന്തിനെയും reject ചെയ്യുന്നു
Highlight of the video is that quote, it explains everything
Valare clear presentation ❤️🔥❤️
സൂപ്പർ..... ഭാവി വാഗ്ദാനം
Very good presentation and nice talk we support u bro 😎👍
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]...
.
@@jobinkoshy8197 ഈ തള്ള് ഇവിടെത്തന്നെ പല പ്രാവശ്യം റിപീറ്റ് ചെയ്തിരിക്കുന്നു. ഇങ്ങനെ റിപീറ്റ് ചെയ്യുന്നതുകൊണ്ട് ദൈവം ഉണ്ടെന്നുള്ളതിന്റെ തെളിവാകുന്നില്ല.
Nice👏👏👌
I like it your talk
Clear presentation
Key to unlock the brain
Thank you prathish
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]
..
@@jobinkoshy8197 point enthanu bro ?? 🤔🤔
Superb prathish bro
Quality stuff 💙
Vignu ser ❤️.
Chinese market ല്‍ quality stuff കിട്ടുന്ന ആളുകളോട്, സഹതാപം മാത്രമേ ഉള്ളു. 😊
Availability വെച്ച് നോക്കുമ്പോള്‍, താങ്കൾ appreciate ചെയ്യുന്നത് ശരിയാണ്.
Be happy new year 🌹
#releasevignucut 🔱
Very nice explanation
Excellent presentation...👌👌
Logical.. precise.. coherent..🔥🔥✨
Super presentation
ക്ലൈമാക്സ്‌ ൽ ഒരു ഓട്ടോ റഫറൻസ് 👍
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]..
@@jobinkoshy8197 ഇതിന് അണ്ണന് ദിവസക്കൂലിയാണോ മാസക്കൂലിയാണോ അതോ ഇനി സ്വർഗത്തിൽ പൂന്തോട്ടത്തിലെ മാനേജർ പണിയാണോ ഓഫർ എന്നറിയില്ല എന്താരായാലും അണ്ണൻ എഴുതി ഒട്ടിക്കുന്ന റിപ്ലൈ പരീക്ഷക്ക് 500 വാക്കിൽ കവിയാതെ എഴുതിയിരിക്കുന്ന ഉപന്യാസം പോലുണ്ട്. എന്റെ പൊന്നു ജോബിൻ അണ്ണോ ഇതൊക്ക വായിച്ചു മെനക്കെടാൻ ആരെ കൊണ്ട് പറ്റും അത് കൊണ്ട് അടുത്ത തവണ അണ്ണൻ 50 വാക്കിൽ കവിയാതെ ഉപന്യസം എഴുതി ഒട്ടിക്കുമെന്ന് പ്രതീക്ഷിക്കുന്നു അല്ലെങ്കിൽ അണ്ണന്റെ സ്വർഗ്ഗത്തിലെ ജോലി ഗോവിന്ദ അണ്ണൻ ഒട്ടിച്ചാൽമാത്രം പോരല്ലോ അത് ആരെങ്കിലും വായിക്കണ്ടേ എന്താരായാലും കൊള്ളാടെ അണ്ണാ
പണ്ട് ഇത് പോലെ ഒട്ടിച്ചു നടന്ന കാലം ഓർമ വരുന്നു.. 😂
@@Sanoop777 Science points to God
Antony Flew (Ex atheist Philosopher) "I now believe that the universe was brought into existence by an infinite intelligence... Why do I believe this, given that I expanded and defended atheism for more than a half century?... It is not science alone that has guided me. I have also been helped by a renewed study of the classical philosophical arguments."
James Tour (Scientist) "I stand in awe of God because of what he has done through his creation. My faith has been increased through my research. Only a rookie who knows nothing about science would say science takes away from faith"
Sharon Dirckx (Neuroscientist) "Science could never disprove God... Science is not designed to resolve the question of whether God exists. Of course, If God is real, there will be signs pointing in his direction - as I believe there are. But science deals with the natural world"
Antony flew (Ex atheist Philosopher) "Science spotlights three dimensions of nature that point to God. The first is the fact that nature obeys laws. The second is the dimension of life, of intelligently organized and purpose-driven beings, which arose from matter. The third is the very existence of nature" "The leaders of science over the last hundred years, along with some of today’s most influential scientists, have built a philosophically compelling vision of a rational universe that sprang from a divine Mind"
Paul Davies (agnostic physicist) “Science is based on the assumption that the universe is thoroughly rational and logical at every level. Atheists claim that the laws [of nature] exist reasonlessly and that the universe is ultimately absurd. As a scientist, I find this hard to accept. There must be an unchanging rational ground in which the logical, orderly nature of the universe is rooted”
Issac Newton (Scientist) "Atheism is so senseless. When I look at the solar system, I see the earth at the right distance from the sun to receive the proper amount of heat and light. This did not happen by chance" "This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent being"
Abdu Murray (Christian apologist and Laywer) "How could it be possible that we, these super intelligent beings, somehow rose from non intelligence(?)... Maybe the reality is that human beings capable of such leaps of logic and boundless creativity are the effect because the first cause is a supreme mind"
Charles Darwin (Father of Evolution) "[Reason tells me of the] extreme difficulty or rather impossibility of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe, including man with his capability of looking far backwards and far into futurity, as the result of blind chance or necessity. When thus reflecting I feel compelled to look to a First Cause having an intelligent mind in some degree analogous to that of man; and I deserve to be called a Theist" [The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882, pg 92-3]
Frank Turek (Christian Apologist) "If Atheism is true, our minds are just molecular machines controlled completely by physics and biology, which means: We don't have free will; We don't reason, we merely react. Therefore we shouldn't trust anything we believe, including atheism"
Antony Flew (Ex atheist Philosopher) “[Talking about the informational content of DNA] The only satisfactory explanation for the origin of such ‘end-directed, self-replicating’ life is an infinitely intelligent Mind" "The philosophical question that has not been answered in origin-of-life studies is this: How can a universe of mindless matter produce beings with intrinsic ends, self-replication capabilities, and 'coded chemistry'?"
John Lennox (Christian apologist and Oxford Mathematician) “We have only to see a few letters of the alphabet spelling our name in the sand to recognize at once the work of an intelligent agent. How much more likely, then is the existence of an intelligent Creator behind human DNA, the colossal biological database that contains no fewer than 3.5 billion ‘letters’” [God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway?, p. 75]
Michael Denton (Scientist) “The complexity of the simplest known cell is as great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could have been thrown together by an improbable event. Such an occurrence would be indistinguishable from a miracle.”
Asher John (Christian Apologist) "The case for theism is not based on what we do not know but what we do know. It is based on the scientific evidence that has emerged in the recent decades that the case for theism stands stronger than any other period in history."
John Lennox (Christian apologist and Oxford Mathematician) "God no more conflicts with science as an explanation for the universe than Henry Ford conflicts with the laws of the internal combustion engine as an explanation for the motorcar. The existence of mechanisms and laws is not an argument for the absence of an agent who set those laws and mechanisms in place. On the contrary, their very sophistication, down to the fine tuning of the universe, is evidence for the Creator’s genius"
Super 🥰🥰🥰
നല്ലൊരു പ്രസന്റേഷൻ
അവതരണം വളരെ നല്ല രീതിൽ ആണ്god
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131].
.
Good presentation
പ്രതീഷ്, താങ്കൾക്ക് പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങളിൽ വ്യക്തത ഉണ്ട്, അവ പരിസമാപ്തിയിൽ എത്തിക്കാനും അറിയാം .അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങൾ
Well done bro
Very good presentation
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131].
.
Wow 👌
Super presentation.. complete failure of God inspired and God written books 😂🤣
My favourite argument for atheism 😍😍
👍👍👍👏👏👏🎉
Wow , the best...
Pratheesh 🔥🔥
Excellent presentation
Super🔥🔥
Pratishaeeee well done bro. 🎉🎉
❤❤❤
👍👍👍
ശിരിക് ശിരിക് ശിരിക് 😥 ഇമാൻ ബുറാഖിൽ കയറി പോയി 🚀
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]
.
So brilliant presentation and really our knowledge was very much zero in the beginning and so somebody tried to bring some changes through their own way which was only possible then! But accidentally all just copied without any of their own ability to bring any vital points which will give atleast little more awareness than earlier and so we have to suffer with our own blunder ! Really if there is a choice now it is our time to think more constructively to make all of us well prepared to take good suggestions of others as well as our own is the exact method to lead a more lively life than existing all religions! Without hurting none ,that is religion and so only need is just you as for so long we all have that much experience to know the essence of life!
#releasevignucut🔱
താങ്കൾക്ക് പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങളിൽ വ്യക്തത ഉണ്ട്, അവ പരിസമാപ്തിയിൽ എത്തിക്കാനും അറിയാം .അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങൾ
👍❤
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]
@@jobinkoshy8197 ഓ എന്റെ സാറേ. 😆🙏
🙌🏻
🔥🔥🔥
വൈശാഖൻ തമ്പിയുടെ same മാനറിസം ഉള്ള പോലെ തോനുന്നു.
ഇതൊക്കെ തന്നെയാ മതവിശ്വാസത്തിനു ഒര് തെളിവ്, നമ്മൾ ജനിച്ച്, അല്പം വകതിരിവ് വന്നു, പുറത്തേക്കു നോക്കുമ്പോൾ മിന്നി തിളങ്ങുന്ന കോടി കണക്കിന് നക്ഷത്രങ്ങൾ, സ്വയം കറങ്ങുന്ന പ്രകാശിക്കുന്ന ഗോളങ്ങൾ, അപ്പോൾ നമ്മൾ ആലോചിക്കും ഇതെങ്ങനെ ഉണ്ടായി, ആർ ഉണ്ടാക്കി, (കുറേ മരക്ഷണങ്ങൾ ഒര് ഷെഡിൽ കുറെ നാൾ വെച്ചപ്പോൾ, അല്ലെങ്കിൽ കുറേ പാർട്സ് ഒര് ഷോറൂമിൽ കുറേ നാൾ വെച്ചപ്പോൾ അവ സ്വയം ഉരുണ്ട്, നടന്ന് നിവർന്ന്, നടന്ന് പരന്നു ഒട്ടി അങ്ങിനെ മേശ, കസേര, സ്റ്റൂൾ, കാർ, ബസ്സ്, ജീപ്പ് എന്നിവ ഉണ്ടാകുമോ ഉണ്ടാകുമെന്നു സാമാന്യ ബുദ്ധിയുള്ള ആർക്കെങ്കിലും വിശ്വസിക്കാൻ പറ്റുമോ ഇല്ലാ, എന്നിട്ടും അങ്ങിനെ സ്വയം ഈ പ്രപഞ്ചം ഉണ്ടായി എന്ന് വിശ്വസിക്കുന്ന മണ്ടൻ ആശയങ്ങളെ കുറിച്ചാണ് നബി പറഞ്ഞത് ( മനുഷ്യന് തിരിയാത്ത ആശയം എന്ന് ) എന്ന ചോദ്യം വരും ശാസ്ത്രം ഉണ്ടാക്കിയോ, ഇല്ല യുക്തിവാദികൾ ഉണ്ടാക്കിയോ അതും ഇല്ലാ പരിണാമ വാദികൾ ഉണ്ടാക്കിയോ ഇല്ലാ, ശാസ്ത്രം പഠിച്ച് ഗോത്രം വിട്ടവർ വന്നു ഉണ്ടാക്കിയോ അതും ഇല്ലാ, അപ്പോൾ അത് ഉണ്ടാക്കാൻ കഴിവുള്ള, അതിനപ്പുറവും കൂടി യുള്ള ഒര് ശക്തി, കഴിവ് ഉള്ളവൻ ഉണ്ടായിരിക്കും തീർച്ച. അതിന് എവിടെയും തപ്പി തടയേണ്ടതില്ല ബുദ്ധിയുണ്ടെങ്കിൽ.....
ഇനി ശാസ്ത്രം എടുക്കുക ശാസ്ത്രം പറയുന്നു big bang എന്നതിലുടെ ഈ പ്രപഞ്ചം ഉണ്ടായി, ആദ്യം ഒര് മസ്സ്‌ ( പിന്ധം ) പോലെ ആയിരുന്നു, പിന്നീട് വികസിച്ചു, അപ്പോൾ ആദ്യം ഒര് വസ്തു ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നുവെന്നു വ്യക്തം, അപ്പോൾ അത് പ്രപഞ്ചത്തിന്റെ അപ്പുറത്തേക്ക് വിരൽ ചൂണ്ടുന്നു,.. ഇനി യുക്തിവാദികളുടെ കാര്യം എടുക്കാം അതാണ് ഭൂലോക കോമഡിയും മണ്ടത്തരവും ആദ്യം ഒന്നും ഇല്ലായിരുന്നു, അങ്ങിനെ ഒര് പൊട്ടിത്തെറിയിലൂടെ ഈ പ്രപഞ്ചം ഉണ്ടായി, എന്ത് പൊത്തിതെറിച്ചു ( വികസിച്ചു ),എവിടെ പൊട്ടിത്തെറിച്ചു വെന്ന് പറയാൻ പറ്റില്ല, അങ്ങിനെ പറഞ്ഞൽ അത് എങ്ങിനെ ഉണ്ടായി, അത് പ്രപഞ്ചത്തിന്റെഅപ്പുറത്തേക്കു എത്തും.. അത് കൊണ്ട് അത് പറയില്ല, പറയാൻ യുക്തിവാദികൾക്ക് ആവില്ല,ശുന്യതയിൽ നിന്നു.. മായാ ജാലം അത് കൊണ്ടാണ് മനസ്സിലാകാത്ത മണ്ടൻ വാദങ്ങളെ വിശ്വസിക്കരുതെന്നു,അതായത് ഇല്ലാത്ത സ്ഥലത്ത് ഇല്ലാത്ത വസ്തു വികസിച്ചു എന്ന ഭൂലോക മണ്ടത്തരവും ആയി നടക്കുന്നു, മറിച്ചാണെങ്കിൽ, എവിടെയാ big bang ഉണ്ടായത്, എന്താ വികസിച്ചത് എന്ന് പറയു.. അത് കൊണ്ടാണ് പ്രവാചകൻ ആദ്യമേ പറഞ്ഞത്, ഇങ്ങനെ കുറേ മണ്ടൻ വാദവുമായി ഒര് വിഭാഗം വരും, അവർ പറയുന്നത് അവർക്ക് തന്നെ അറിയില്ല, മനസ്സിലാവില്ല അത് കൊണ്ട് അത് പിൻപറ്റരുതെന്ന്. പ്രവാചക വചനം എത്ര കൃത്യം
Autodidect 🔥🔥🔥
🔥🔥
0:34 മുതൽ 0:49
ഇത് മുഹമ്മദ് നബി പറഞ്ഞതല്ല. Confucius (Chinese philosopher) ആണ് ഈ വാക്കുകൾ പറഞ്ഞത്. This quote is attributed to Confucius, the ancient Chinese philosopher. He emphasized the importance of clear communication to avoid misunderstandings and conflicts among people.
#Releasevignucut 🔱
സ്വന്തമായി ഒരു ദൈവം ഇല്ലാതെ ബോറടിച്ച് കഴിയുന്ന ഒരു അന്യഗ്രഹജീവി ദൈവങ്ങളുടെ സൂപ്പർമാർക്കറ്റായ നമ്മുടെ ഭൂമിയിലെത്തി ഒരു ദൈവത്തെ തിരഞ്ഞെടുക്കാൻ തീരുമാനിച്ചാൽ ആകെ പെട്ടെത് തന്നെ...... ഭൂമിയിലെ എയർപോർട്ടിൽ വന്നിറങ്ങുന്ന അന്യഗ്രഹജീവി, നിരവധി ഓഫറുകൾ ഉള്ള സിം കാർഡ് വിൽക്കുവാൻ എയർപോർട്ടിൽ ക്യൂ നിൽക്കുന്ന ഏജന്റ് മാരെ പോലെ,ദൈവത്തിന്റെ ഏജന്റ്മാർ നിൽക്കുന്നത് കണ്ട് കണ്ണ് തള്ളും......
സുഹൃത്തേ, ദൈവത്തെ കണ്ടെത്താൻ അന്യ ഗൃഹത്തില്‍ പോകുന്നത് ശരിയാണോ എന്ന് നോക്കുക.
യേശു പറയുന്ന ഒരു വചനം ഓര്‍ക്കുക.
"സ്വന്തം കണ്ണിലേ കോല് എടുത്ത് കളയാതെ മറ്റുള്ളവരുടെ കണ്ണിലെ കരട് കാണിക്കാൻ ശ്രമിക്കുക"
ചിലർക്ക് . 90%ഏതെങ്കിലും സ്ഥലത്ത് നമ്മളെ പ്രതിഷ്ടിക്കണം എന്നതാണ്. എന്നെ ? അത്ഭുതപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്.
YukttyYugamKaliYugam❤🙏
Junior vyshakan thambi😅😅👍
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]
@@jobinkoshy8197 ഈ പ്രസന്റേഷനെ സപ്പോർട്ട് ചെയ്യുന്ന എല്ലാ കമൻറിലും താങ്കളുടെ ഈ റിപ്ലൈ കമന്റ് ഇടണം. എങ്കിലേ ഒരു ഗുമ്മ് കിട്ടത്തൊള്ളൂ. നാണമില്ലേടോ തനിക്ക്?
@@sarayusmusic431 😹
No he is senior🔱
Pratish ❤
Viswasikal iswasikkunna daivam enna supernatural power undenkil avarude lifeil oru tharathilulla preshnangalum tragediyum undavaruth angane oru tharathilulla preshnangalum illatha life happy aayittirikkunna ethra families und avarkkidayil eg sabarimala pilgrims travel cheytha vahanam accident aayi pilgrs maranappettu theerthadanakendrangalil poya ethra families maricha vartha nammal kelkkunnu kuttikal cheruppakkar ennivarude maranam rogangal ithokke kooduthalayi nammal kelkkunnu daivam undenkil ingane sambavikkamo
Soopar
Supper expecting more presentations....
Where is "chathittilla"
Paula Fredrikson (Jewish scholar) "I know in their own terms what they saw was the risen Jesus. That's what they say, and then all the historic evidence we have afterwards attest to their conviction that that's what they saw. I'm not saying that they really did see the raised Jesus. I wasn't there. I don't know what they saw. But I do know that as a historian that they must have seen something"
Mike Licona (Historian) "The historian looks for high probability and selects the best explanation of the known facts. So what about Jesus' resurrection? Certainly it explains all of the facts and does so easily and without strain... The resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of the historical facts, and therefore, we can conclude with confidence that it was an event that occured in history"
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "Virtually no one, believer or critic, denies that it was their convictions that they had seen the resurrected Jesus that caused the disciples' radical transformation. They are willing to die specifically for their resurrection belief"
Mike Licona (historian) “After Jesus’ death, the disciples endured persecution, and a number of them experienced martyrdom. The strength of their conviction indicates that they were not just claiming Jesus had appeared to them after rising from the dead. They really believed it. They willingly endangered themselves by publicly proclaiming the risen Christ.”
Christopher Price (Christian NT Scholar) “Most striking perhaps is that fact that Jesus appeared to Paul. Paul hated Christians and was hell-bent on destroying the church. What transformed him from a persecutor of Christians to a pastor, who was willing to endure extraordinary hardship to proclaim the Gospel? Paul claimed it was the resurrection. This also indicates that Jesus didn’t just appear to friends or followers who might have been predisposed to think high and exalted things about him. Christ appeared to skeptics (James) and unbelievers (Paul) and they were convinced based on the reality of the resurrection”
Justin W. Bass (Christian Professor) "The earliest followers of Jesus in the AD 30s were proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross for their sins and rose from the dead as Lord of the world. Jesus’ brother James, his chief apostle Peter, and his enemy Paul all claimed that the resurrected Jesus appeared to them. That these three men believed this is historically irrefutable"
JND Anderson (Professor of Law) "'I can’t help it, however strong the evidence may be, I will never believe that Tom Smith could be dead for a large number of hours and then come alive again', Would that apply to the One (Jesus) of whom we are speaking? Why, he was unique-unique in his teaching, unique in his miracles, unique in his claims, unique in his personality, unique in his sinlessness. Quite apart from the resurrection there is most excellent evidence, to me at least, that he wasn’t just a man but God incarnate. Is it incredible that such a One should rise again?"
Messiah Brown (Messianic Jewish Scholar) "(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12) is one of the most important messianic prophecies in the entire hebrew Bible, and I would not be exaggerating to say that more Jews have put their faith in Jesus as Messiah after reading this passage of scripture than after reading any other passage in the tanakh. To the unbiased reader, it clearly speaks about the death and resurrection of the righteous servant of the Lord on behalf of his sinful people. It speaks of Yeshua [Jesus]"
Norman Geisler (Christian Professor) "Hundreds of predictions, some of them given hundreds of years in advance, have been literally fulfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) of Christ's birth were foretold in the Old testament, as were dozens of other things about his life, death, and resurrection (Isaiah 53)"
Justin Bass (NT professor) "Scholars from all different backgrounds... are virtually unanimous that this creedal tradition dates, on average, to within 5 years of Jesus' death (1 Cor 15:3-7 he died for our sins, he appeared other apostles)
Gred Ludemann (atheist nt professor) " The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years... The formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in 1 Cor 15:3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE" [The Resurrection of Jesus, pg 171-72]
Gary Habermas (Christian Philosopher) "The importance of the creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-5 can hardly be overestimated. No longer can it be charged that there is no demonstratable early, eyewitness testimony of the resurrection or for the other important tenets of Christianity, for this creed provides just such evidential data concerning the facts of the Gospel, which are the very centre of the Christian faith"
Bart Ehrman (agnostic nt scholar) "Paul indicates on several occasions that the traditions about Jesus are ones that he himself inherited from those who came before him. This is clearly implied when he says that he " Handed over" what he earlier had "received," technical language in antiquity for passing on traditions and teachings among Jewish rabbis... where did Paul get all this received tradition, from whom, and most important, when? Paul himself gives us some hint. He indicates in Galatians (Gal 1-2)... Paul must have been converted sometime after the death of Jesus around 30CE and sometime before 40CE (Bart puts it to AD 32-33)... Paul went to Jerusalem to visit Cephas (Peter) and James three years after his conversion, he would have seen them, and received the traditions... say the year 35 or 36" [Did Jesus Exist? Pages 130-131]..
@@jobinkoshy8197 അയ്ന്
@@shejilthaivalappil5232 Here it goes czcams.com/video/L__s8z5SYpg/video.html
#releasevignucut 🔱
മതവാദികൾക്ക് മാത്രമല്ല ഇന്റർനാഷണൽ എക്സ്പേർട്ടുകൾക്ക് കൂടി അവരുടെ ഹുങ്കിനേറ്റ ഒരടിയാണു ഈ പ്രസന്റേഷൻ ... 😜😜
Pratish എന്നാണ്
Pratish Bro. I've seen you in telegram and clubhouse. Your clarity on topics and thoughts and the process of reason is just lit 🔥. The future of freethinking communities is safe in the hands of youths like you bro.
4500 views and its still 1st Jan
Ithu Vaishakan Thampi alle?
Unambiguous presentation. Expecting more.
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
Principles nte കാര്യത്തിൽ..Catholic church ന് ഒരു മാറ്റവും ഇല്ല.അതിനു catechism of CC എന്ന ബുക്ക് ഉണ്ട്... catholic Church നിന്ന് പുറത്ത് പോയവര് വഴിയിൽ കിടന്നു അടികുന്നുണ്ട്..
✌️✌️
A
When it comes to Christianity, if you look through history then you will know primarily there are two. Orthodoxy & Catholicism. From Catholicism was divided the Protestants. There have been many heretic views throughout history of Church & people blame one with another & have interdenominational arguments. But that doesn't disprove the truth of Christianity. Point with Christianity is that we all follow One single Creed. There's no divergence from that!
I think the premises are right but the conclusion is too strong. It's predicted best under any model where God doesn't care about salvation having a proper interpretation: Deism, Universalist Theism, Atheism, etc.
Does the premises support this claim - we should not rely divine books on making moral judgements in society
@@pratishvamadevan How should people make moral judgement in society?
@@9535310131 secular reasoning
@@pratishvamadevan won't work, Reason is a tool based on logic. Morality is expected even when you are logically not very sound.
I can't expect a thief to use logical reasoning to behave morally with me.
@@9535310131 if logic doesn’t work then nothing will work 🙂. Every academic branch is based on logic. History, politics, philosophy, science ethics
ദൈവത്തിന്റെ :
വാസസ്ഥലം = അറിയില്ല
വലിപ്പം = അറിയില്ല
എന്താണ് ദൈവം ??
Maybe trying to catch up with lost time ….as only now people have courage to criticise islam 😂
Quran bible geetha ithokke manushya nirmithamalle
ഇനി നിങ്ങൾ പറഞ്ഞ പോലെ ഒരാൾ ഉറങ്ങുന്നു, രാവിലെ എഴുന്നേറ്റപ്പോൾ ഒര് സംശയം, മഴ പൈയ്യ്തോ ഇല്ലയോ എന്ന്, അയാൾ ജനലിലൂടെ നോക്കി. മരത്തിലും പറമ്പിലും വെള്ളംഅപ്പോൾ സാധാരണ മനുഷ്യൻ എന്ത് മനസ്സിലാകും മഴ ഉണ്ടായിരിക്കണം എന്ന്. അല്ലാതെ വെറുതേ വെള്ളം ഉണ്ടാവില്ലല്ലോ, ok എന്നതാ പോലെ തന്നെയാണ് ഈ ലോകത്തിലെ ആരും പ്രപഞ്ചത്തെ ഉണ്ടാക്കി എന്ന് പറയാത്ത കാലത്തോളം, അതിനപ്പുറം ഉള്ള എന്തോ ഒന്ന് ഉണ്ടാക്കി എന്ന് ഉറപ്പ്, അല്ലാതെ വെറുതേ സ്വയം ഉണ്ടാവില്ലെന്നു മനസ്‌ഡിലാക്കാം
E freethinkers prejudiced anu. Peru mattanam .
അങ്ങോട്ട് ഒക്കുന്നില്ല.. മാപ് ഒന്നും.. 😅
Map തുടക്കം മുതലെടുത്താൽ ശരിയാവും. പക്ഷേ ഇടക്ക് കേറി വായിച്ചാ, ചിലപ്പോൾ മാത്രമേ ശരിയാവു...
Big bang പോലും തെറ്റായി കാണാം.
@@jacobcj9227 ഓഹ്. ആയിക്കോട്ടെ 😅
വിഷയം suggest ചെയ്തുതന്ന ഫാത്തിമയോ........ നരകത്തിലെ വിറകുകൊള്ളി ആകാനാണോ തീരുമാനം....... സ്വർഗ്ഗം വേണ്ടേ.......😊
czcams.com/video/tF-1dF0eBts/video.html
(പ്രപഞ്ചം - പ്രവർത്തന തത്വം)
You should have spelled the name of the resource person correctly. This is disgusting.
You mean 10th സർട്ടിഫിക്കറ്റ് name??
കുലംകുത്തി,,,,,😀😀😀😀😀😀
5:51 False Dichotomy.
Explain what more options are there? False dichotomy occurs when someone limits it to 2 possibilities when there are more possibilities than 2.. If there is only 2 options then it is not a false dichotomy..👍
@@lordeiberman5286 Some other possibilities
3. എഴുതിയ ആൾ ഉദ്ദേശിച്ചത് വായിക്കുന്നവരിൽ ഒരു പ്രത്യേക level of honesty ഉള്ളവർ കൃത്യമായി മനസ്സിലാക്കിയാൽ മതി എന്നാണു.
4. വായിക്കുന്ന ആളുകളിൽ കുറെ പേർക്ക് മാപ്പ് കാണിക്കുന്ന ശരിയായ ദിശയിൽ പോകാൻ താല്പര്യമില്ല അവർ മനസ്സിലാകാത്ത പോലെ അഭിനയിക്കുന്നു.
5. മാപ് വളരെ ഏറെക്കുറെ കൃത്യമായി വഴി കാണിക്കുന്നു എന്നാൽ ബോധപൂർവം ചെറിയ ഒരു AMBIGUITY അതിൽ ഉൾപ്പെടുത്തിയിട്ടുണ്ട്. കാരണം നമുക്കറിയില്ല. എന്നാൽ തരക്കേടില്ലാത്ത രീതിയിൽ ചെറിയ ഒരു ഗ്രാമത്തിലേക്കെങ്കിലും രക്ഷപ്പെടാൻ ഈ മാപ്പ് വഴി ആർക്കും പറ്റും
6. Some degree of combinations of point 3 and 4.
We might be able to think of more possibilities. Anyway this speaker is clearly committing false dichotomy.
@@personalprofile1939 3 and 4 comes under the second theory - god didn’t intend this to be understood by everyone 🙂…
@@pratishvamadevan 4th can''t come under second theory. (Everyone understands the map but many people act as if they didn't understand, ie they just don't want to move from there).
God wanted everyone to understand and Everyone understood. But they just don't want to follow the map or move from there. They act as if they understand differently.
@@personalprofile1939 so 3rd is out of the equation. Now if we take your 4th option - that means religious folks and religious scholars are lying 🙂. This makes the question- Who is lying?? The team that takes your interpretation or the other side ? 😊😊😊
Pratish sangi aanu. Islam, Christianity mathram vimarshichu. Hinduism thottillaa.
Sathyam💯
🤣
Reductio ടീം മൊത്തം സങ്കി ആണേ 😁
🤣🤣🤣
ഒരിക്കൽക്കൂടി കേൾക്കുക ...
ഇപ്പോഴത്തെ നവ യുക്തിവാദികളും, മത ദൈവ വീക്ഷണവും ഉള്ള ആളുകൾ, യഥാർത്ഥ യുക്തിവാദം എന്തെന്ന് ആദ്യം മനസ്സിലാക്കുക.
ആദ്യം ലക്ഷ്യം ആണ് പ്രധാനം.
അത് ദൈവം എന്താണ്, ആരാണ്, എവിടെയാണ് ഇതൊക്കെയാണ് നോക്കേണ്ടത്.
അല്ലാതെ മുന്‍വിധിയോടെ , ദൈവം മതങ്ങളും കാണിക്കുന്ന പുസ്തകത്തിൽ അല്ല അന്വേഷിക്കേണ്ടത്. സ്വന്തം മനസ്സിൽ, അതിന് ശേഷം എവിടെനിന്നും എന്നും മനസ്സിലാകും
എങ്കിൽ പറയൂ ദൈവം ആരാണ്?
@@harikk1490 നീയും ഞാനും തമ്മില്‍ എന്തെങ്കിലും positive ആയി ബന്ധം ഉണ്ടെങ്കിൽ അത് മറ്റുള്ളവരെ അടുപ്പിക്കാന്‍ കഴിയുന്നു എങ്കിൽ അതാണ് ദൈവം.
@@jacobcj9227
അപ്പോൾ അതിന് വിപരീതം സംഭവിക്കുമ്പോൾ ദൈവം മരിക്കുന്നുണ്ടോ അതോ ശക്തി കുറയുന്നുണ്ടോ
@@harikk1490 സുഹൃത്തേ, ആ ചോദ്യം public comment ല്‍ കാണുന്നില്ലല്ലോ?
I don't want to hide anything from public unless it has some purpose.
താങ്കള്‍ക്ക് എന്തെങ്കിലും hide ചെയ്യാൻ ഉണ്ടോ???
Munvidhikalode aaraanu pravarthikkunnath enn aadhyam swayam chodikku. Janichu veenappol muthal kanddu thudangiya matham enna prasthaanam, athepadi oru chodyangalum chodikkathe athupoley vizhungi nadakkunnavar aano... Atho padichu vanna kaaryangalile pottatharangalum inconsistency um manassilaakki mathatheenn maarunnavar aano enn.
തെളിവുകളുടെ നയിക്കുവാനുള്ള കഴിവ് എത്റത്തോളം ?
നാസ്തികത സത്യം എന്ന് അടിയുറച്ച് വിശ്വസിക്കുന്ന വ്യക്തിക്ക് നാസ്തികത എന്ന മതത്തിന്റെ പരിധിക്ക് പുറത്തേക്ക് നയിക്കാനുതകു ന്ന തെളിവുകളില്ല. മതത്തിന്റെ അടിസ്ഥാന പ്റമാണന്ഗളെ വെല്ലു വിളിക്കുന്നവന് മാത്റമേ സത്യാന് വേഷണത്തില് പുരോഗതി കൈ വരിക്കാനാകൂ.
നാസ്തിക മതത്തിന്റെ അടിസ്ഥാന പ്റമാണത്തെ (ദൈവം ഇല്ല എന്ന പ്റമാണം) ചോദ്യം ചെയ്യുന്നവന് map ന് അതീതമായ സത്യം സ്റുഷ്ടിക്കു വാനാകൂ 🙏
സത്യം സ്വതന്ത്റമാക്കും
മതത്തില് നിന്ന്
താങ്കൾ, map present ചെയ്തിരിക്കുന്നത്, ക്രിസ്തു മത ത്തിന്റെ ബൈബിൾ ല്‍ നിന്നാണ്
അതിൽ ധാരാളം യുക്തിക്ക് ചേരാത്ത ധാരാളം വസ്തുത, ഉല്‍പത്തി എന്ന പുസ്തകത്തിലും, സുവിശേഷവും പഴയ നിയമത്തിലും വൈരുധ്യം, കാണുന്നില്ലേ??
നന്ദി ഉദാഹരണത്തിന്
അറിവിന്റെ കനി
@@tkthomas3489 ആദ്യമായി ബൈബിൾ നെ വിമര്‍ശിച്ചതിന്, എന്നോടും നന്ദി കാണിച്ചതിന്, താങ്കൾ ക്കും നന്ദി 🙏😄
@@jacobcj9227 ആ കഥ scientific temper promote ചെയ്യുന്നതാണ്
@@tkthomas3489 വെറുതെ മോഹിപ്പിച്ചു. സാരമില്ല.
ഉല്‍പത്തി യും സുവിശേഷവും രണ്ടും വൈരുദ്ധ്യാത്മക൦ എന്ന് ഞാൻ എഴുതിയത്, scientific temper കൊണ്ട് മാത്രം അല്ല, spiritual temper കൊണ്ടുമാണ്.
സുഹൃത്തേ, ഞാൻ യേശുവില്‍ മാത്രം വിശ്വസിക്കുന്നു, അതിന് കാരണം, നമ്മുടെ മനസ്സിലെ ശരിയും ആയി compare ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ യഹോവ യുടെ നിയമം വളരെ contradictory ആയി സുവിശേഷത്തില്‍ പറയുമ്പോൾ, നമ്മൾ ഇപ്പോഴും കണ്ണ് കണ്ണുപൊട്ടന്മാരെ പോലെ ആട്ടിൻതോലണിയിച്ച ചെന്നായളുടെ പുറകെ പോകുന്ന പുരോഹിത വർഗ്ഗത്തെ തിരിച്ചറിയാൻ കഴിയാത്ത കൊണ്ടാണ് ഈ ദുരന്തം
താങ്കൾ case study എടുക്കുന്നത് തന്നെ ക്രിസ്തു മതത്തിന്റെ , തെറ്റ്കളില്‍ നിന്നാണ്. .
*1 ഒന്നാമത്തെ തെറ്റായ വീക്ഷണം
ക്രിസ്തുവിന്റെ ആശയങ്ങള്‍ പഠിപ്പിക്കുന്നത്, ക്രിസ്തുവിന്റെ സുവിശേഷത്തില്‍ നിന്നാണ്. അല്ലാതെ ബൈബിൾല്‍ നിന്നും അല്ലായെന്ന് വ്യക്തമാക്കിയിട്ട് വേണമായിരുന്നു.
*2 .സുവിശേഷത്തില്‍, അതും ഒരെണ്ണം മാത്രം ക്രിസ്തുവിന്റെ ഒരു followers നിന്നും ബാക്കി സുവിശേഷം followers ന്റെ followers ല്‍ നിന്നുമാണ്, അറിവ്. അതായത് കൂടുതലും വ്യക്തമായ ആശയം യോഹന്നാന്റെ സുവിശേഷത്തില്‍ നിന്നാണ്.
അതായത് മറ്റുള്ള മൂന്ന് gospel, കുറച്ചുകൂടി beautify ചെയ്യാൻ, കാണിച്ചു എന്ന് മനസ്സിലാകും.
ഇത് മറ്റൊരു തെറ്റായ ആശയം, നിങ്ങളെ പോലെയുള്ള നിരീശ്വര വാദിക്ക് വളം കൊടുത്തു.
*3. ക്രിസ്തുവിന്റെ കാലത്ത്‌, ഇപ്പോഴുള്ള canonical Bible ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നില്ല. അതും മനസ്സിലാക്കുക. ഇപ്പോഴത്തെ ക്രിസ്തു മതത്തിന്റെ വേദ പുസ്തകം ഉണ്ടാക്കിയത്, ക്രിസ്തുവിനും എകദേശം 325 വര്ഷം ശേഷമാണ്.
ഇനിയും യേശുവിനെ കുറിച്ച് എത്രയും തെറ്റിദ്ധരിക്കുന്ന കാര്യമാണ്, ഈ മത വും ബൈബിൾ പരത്തുന്നത്, അവരുടെ കള്ള പുരോഹിതനും church ശ്രമിക്കുന്നത് എന്ന്, ഇതുപോലത്തെ നവ യുക്തികള്‍, സാധാരണ ജനങ്ങളില്‍ ഉണ്ടാക്കുന്നത്‌, നിങ്ങൾ അറിയുന്നോ???
സത്യം കാണാന്‍ ആഗ്രഹിക്കുന്ന "സ്വതന്ത്ര" യുക്തി വാദികള്‍, യേശുവിനെ മനസ്സിലാക്കാൻ ശ്രമിക്കുക.
ഇപ്പോഴത്തെ freethinkers സ്വതന്ത്ര്യം അറിയാത്ത, കുറെ ചെറുപ്പക്കാര്‍, തെറ്റായ യുക്തി യില്‍ പോകുന്നതാണ്
വായിച്ചോ, പടം കണ്ടോ, അതല്ല ആഹാരവും വെള്ളവും മുൻപിൽ ഇരുന്നാലും ,, അതു അകത്തേക്ക് കഴിക്കാതെ വിശപ്പും ദാഹവും മാറില്ല,, മാപ്പ്, ബുക്ക്, വരകൾ, കാർട്ടൂൺ, സംസാരം, പഠിപ്പീര്, കാഴ്ച, ചിന്ത , കേൾവി, ഇങ്ങനെയുള്ള മാധ്യമങ്ങൾ ഒന്നും തന്നെ , നമ്മൾക്ക് അനുഭവം തരില്ല, അതു സ്വയം അനുഭവിച്ചു മനസ്സിൽ ആക്കണം, മേൽ പറഞ്ഞ മാധ്യമങ്ങൾ നമ്മൾക്ക് മനസ്സിൽ ആക്കാനും അനുഭവിക്കാനുള്ള ഒരു ത്വര ,വളരെ കുറച്ചു പേരിൽ ഉണ്ടാക്കാം എന്നേയുള്ളു, , എന്നാൽ വിരലിൽ എണ്ണാവുന്ന ആളുകൾക്കെ അനുഭവിക്കാൻ സാധിക്കയുള്ളു,, അതു പോലെ ഈ കാണുന്നതും കാണാത്തതും, അറിയുന്നതും , അറിയപ്പെടാത്തത് ഒക്കെ സ്വയം ത്തിൽനിന്നും സൃഷ്ടിച്ചു സ്വയത്തിൽ നിലനിർത്തി, സ്വയത്തിലേക്കു തന്നെ തിരികെ കൂട്ടുന്ന, ആ ശക്തിയെ അനുഭവിച്ചേ , രുചിച്ചു അനുഭവത്തിൽ വരണം ,,, അല്ലാതെ ഒന്നും തന്നെ മനസ്സിൽ ആക്കാൻ ഒക്കില്ല, എത്ര പ്രസംഗിച്ചാലും, പരിമിതിയുള്ള ഒന്നിനും തന്നെ പരിമിതികൾ ഇല്ലാത്ത ഒന്നിനെയും പഠിച്ചു മനസിലാക്കാൻ ഒക്കില്ല,, അതു അനുഭവിച്ചു രുചിച്ചു തന്നെ സ്വയം അറിയണം,,, എല്ലാ സൃഷ്ടികളും ആ ശക്തിയിൽ തന്നെയാണ് നിലനിൽക്കുന്നത്,,, നമ്മൾ ഈ ഭൂമിയിൽ ചവിട്ടി നിൽക്കുന്ന പോലെ, ഒരു പെയിന്റിംഗ് അല്ലെങ്കിൽ ഒരു ചിത്രം ക്യാൻവാസിൽ ഇരിക്കുന്നത് പോൽ,,,, എല്ലാ മത പുസ്തകം ങ്ങളും ഒന്നിലേക്ക് തന്നെയാണ് നയിക്കുന്നത്, പക്ഷേ പല വഴികളിൽ കൂടി ആ ശക്തിയെ അനുഭവിക്കണം,, എല്ലാം ഒന്ന് തന്നെ രണ്ടില്ല,, രണ്ടു എന്നുള്ളതാണ് മായ, ഈ ഒന്ന് അനുഭവിച്ചർ വളരെ കുറവ് എണ്ണത്തിൽ, ഈ ഒന്ന് അനുഭവിച്ചർക്ക്, ഒന്നിൽ ഒന്നായവർക്ക് ഈ ശക്തിയെ തെളിയിക്കാൻ ഒക്കും,, പക്ഷെ അവർക്കറിയാം ആ തെളിവ് കാണിച്ചാലും , സ്വന്തമായി ഒരാൾ അനുഭവിക്കാതെ അയാൾ ഒന്നിൽ ലയിക്കയില്ല,,, ഓറഞ്ച് കണ്ടാൽ മാത്രം ഓറഞ്ച് എന്താണ് എന്ന് അനുഭവിക്കാൻ ഒക്കുമോ,,,, നിങ്ങൾ അന്വേഷിച്ചു കണ്ടെത്തി അനുഭവിക്കണം, അതു ഓരോരുത്തരുടെയും തീരുമാനം ആണ്,,, ഈ ജന്മത്തിൽ അല്ലെങ്കിൽ സാരമില്ല , എല്ലാ സൃഷ്ട്ടികളും പല ജന്മത്തിലൂടെ ആ ഒന്നിൽ എത്തും,,, അതു വരെ കഷ്ടം കഷ്ടം ലോകത്തിൽ അനുഭവിക്കുക
എന്തോ കൂടിയ സാധനം ആണ് അടിച്ചത് എന്ന് തോന്നുന്നു....... മൂന്ന് വഴിയിലും കൂടി സഞ്ചരിച്ച് ഒന്നിൽ എത്താം എന്നതൊക്കെ നിങ്ങളുടെ തോന്നൽ മാത്രമാണ്....... ഒന്നിൽ നിന്ന് മറ്റൊന്നിലേക്ക് മാറി നോക്കണം അപ്പോൾ അറിയാം കഴുത്തിനു മുകളിൽ തലയുണ്ടോ എന്ന്.....
@@satheeshpriya8252 yes i have drunk the highest, the one,,, so no need to drink again,, the thirst is vanished forever,,,
അവതരണം വളരെ മോശം
#releasevignucut🔱
#Releasevignucut 🔱
#releasevignucut 🔱
#releasevignucut🔱
#releasevignucut🔱