💯. She was phenomenal, in a role that was simply too controversial and risqué for the average Academy member to vote for. Hers was the best from a technical perspective, IMHO.
Her and Allison Janney are such amazing supporting actresses. They really know how to be memorable with short screen time and in a perfect world would have multiple nods and at least a win each.
Gorgeous woman. Kim was fantastic in L.A. Confidential. I had only one little issue with this category that year, they did not nominate Sigourney Weaver for her impressive acting in The Ice Storm
haha nice question. I'm nobody to judge these amazing actresses but I know 1 thing - Sigourney Weaver and Kim Basinger were my winners in that category
She was just to die for in that role… STUNNING! I personally sympathize with her because she has an anxiety disorder, not easy ! You can tell by seeing her reaction and Alec Baldwin who was kind of expecting the worst! 😱
Love the way Jack Nicholson stood up and congratulated her 3:41. Brief Batman reunion and blessings from the Joker. I think there was a reason they put Cuba Jr right at the beginning of the show.
Same, unfortunately her movie was probably too “much” for a majority of the Oscar voters. Plus her strongest scenes for toward the end of the film when most of the voters (conservative older men) were probably checked out by that point
@@bryanalstoncoxing. Agreed. A coked out porn star and neglectful mother was probably waaay too dark and controversial for most mainstream Academy voters. I do think it was technically the best performance in the category though. Actually, I thought Julianne was at or near the top of her category 4 out of the 5 times she was nominated, the exception being The End Of The Affair, which is the film in which I think she looked the most beautiful.
I really like her, and she gave a great performance in LAC. I think Julianne Moore’s was technically better. I think her portrayal of a broken, coked out porn star, neglectful mother, yet den mom to a group of “circus freaks” was both too controversial and risqué for the typical Academy member, especially 25 years ago.
All excellent performances. Would have loved if LA Confidential won best picture. Also, Alex's yell from the audience whrn she stated to speak. Weird that moment popped into my head. Had to come back and watch. 2020
She looked perfect. Terrific choice of dress and hairstyle, even if her performance wasn’t technically the best in the category. Julianne’s was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
🤮. Worst in the category. Would have been a mercy win. Julianne turned in the most technically riveting performance, albeit it too controversial and risqué of a role for the average Academy member to vote for, especially 25 years ago.
#JusticeForJulie, who turned in a far more complex and phenomenal role which was simply too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
Kimila "Kim" Basinger was born in Athens, Georgia on December 8, 1953. She will be celebrating her 71st birthday on December 8, 2024. She has garnered acclaim for her work in film, for which she has received various accolades including an Academy Award, a Golden Globe Award, a Screen Actors Guild Award, and a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. . In 2011 Los Angeles Times Magazine ranked her third on the "50 Most Beautiful Women In Film". For her femme fatale portrayal in L.A. Confidential (1997), Basinger won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress.
@@paulvoorhies8821 Dude, why do you keep going on and on about Julianne Moore? This was Kim's night and she deserved it because she was better by far. It's really classless typing in every single comment too. This is Kim's win.
2nd best to Julianne, whose performance, I think, was technically the best but far too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago. Kim wins for best dressed and hairstyle, hands down!
@@paulvoorhies8821 No it wasn't. Boogie Nights was a big movie and I lived the times. I thought the movie was hyped too much if anything and I thought it would be better. It wasn't a good movie. Julianne was good but she was hardly great and Mark Wahlberg's acting was terrible.
@@paulvoorhies8821 Boogie Nights was promoted everwhere. It was hailed as the next Saturday Night Fever, which it wasn't. It certainly wasn't too risque for it's time since all of Hollywood was pushing that crappy movie out.
@@elizabethchwakanowski5067 Total mercy f%ck that would have been. It should have gone to Julianne, whose phenomenal performance was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago. I thought Stuart was the worst in the category. Totally overhyped melodrama.
🤮. Totally overhyped melodrama. Julianne was phenomenal in a far more complex role too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
Stawp. Julianne should have won, as she was phenomenal in a much more complex role that, unfortunately, was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
5. Minnie Driver in Good Will Haunting 4. Joan Cusack in In and Out 3. Julianne Moore in Buggies Night's 2. Kim Basinger un L.A Confidential 1. Should haven won Gloria Stuart in Titanic
Julianne Moore was fantabulous and was absolutely robbed. The utterly transfixing and human way in which she portrayed a porn star is just magnificent.
Did you see Kim Basinger in LA Confidential? I saw both and I thought both were good but Kim stole every scene she was in and so deserved the Oscar. She was better than Julianne.
Joan Cusack, your turn is next. Gloria Stuart is NO longer with us and Minnie Driver is in question since it was her 1st nomination. I watch her show "Speechless".
And Julianne’s already finally won, even though she gave the best performance in this category. The role was just too controversial and risqué for the average Academy member, especially 25 years ago.
She deserved this one since in every scene she was in, she commanded it. That's how strong it was. Gloria would have been nice too but it was Kim's year.
@@paulvoorhies8821 Julianne was good but she didn’t command. Just watch both back to to back to see what I mean. Burt held the supporting role there too bad the academy discriminated
@@elvisleon754 i actually thought Robin Williams was better in Good Will Hunting than Reynolds was in Boogie, so I was fine with that. I’ve seen both films numerous times, and it’s obvious to me that Moore gave the most riveting and complex performance in the category. I like Kim, and I loved LAC-thought it deserved Best Pic, but you’ll never get me to believe that Kim gave a better performance than Julianne. We’ll have to agree to disagree there. The fact is thst Km was the most popular name in the category that night, and we all know how well-loved Alec Baldwin was in the Actor’s branch of the Academy. She was expected to win and did. I think it’s telling too that Julianne went on to be nominated 4 additional times (winning once) over the years. Also interesting is that in the film community exists an organization that hosts and presents the “20/20” awards. That is, films and performances from 20 years ago are revisited and reconsidered in each and every Oscar category, with the benefit of 2 decades of hindsight behind them (hence the name 20/20). Guess who won Supporting Actress at the 2018 ceremony. Guess who didn’t even make the final 5 cut??
@@doodlemunch2774. It didn’t win many, and it shouldn’t have won this one. Julianne was phenomenal in a far more complex role which was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
The oscar should’ve given to Gloria Stuart. She is the most deserving in the bunch. I saw the LA confidential. Her performance is great but not great as Gloria’s performance.
🤮. She was the absolute worst. Would have been a complete mercy f%ck. Julianne’s performance was phenomenal in a role that was far too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
Not a fan of this win but baffled that peoplewould have rather given it to someone for sitting and talking, particularly with those other three performances!
Eh....I always wonder what the politics were at the time...she def was the worst (out of this bunch). Joan Cusack would have been great, Julianne probably should have won.
100% Julianne. She was phenomenal in a far more complex role which unfortunately was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
Correction: this should have been Julianne’s, but the role was far too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago. And, as we know, Alec Baldwin’s popularity with the acting branch back then was off the charts.
@@paulvoorhies8821 Yawns. Dude you got some weird obsession going with JM and nobody is allowed to like Kim Basinger's performance either. KIm beat all of them because she was beautiful and stunning and she commanded the screen like an old Hollywood actress. Julianne played a coked up porn queen who was having sex with teenagers and who left her child for a life of drugs and sex. Kim deserved the win and was better. LA Confidential should have won best picture as Roger Ebert called it the perfect movie in every way and he was right.
I miss the days when you didn't know who was going to win until they won.
Ahh, you kinda new Kimmie was gonna take it.
Me too. 0:50
Kim’s performance in L.A. Confidential was nuanced perfection. She deserved the Oscar
I really like her, but she was a bit wooden. Id’ve voted for Julianne.
You might not feel it but she is so down to earth she laughed on her scene and clapped with the audience
I like your videos!! Always complete with all performances!!
All nominees were sensational. My fave to win was Julianne
💯. She was phenomenal, in a role that was simply too controversial and risqué for the average Academy member to vote for. Hers was the best from a technical perspective, IMHO.
Kim was a deserving winner, but it was interesting to see Joan was nominated, in a comedic role.
Shows how strong her performance was.
Her and Allison Janney are such amazing supporting actresses. They really know how to be memorable with short screen time and in a perfect world would have multiple nods and at least a win each.
Gorgeous woman. Kim was fantastic in L.A. Confidential. I had only one little issue with this category that year, they did not nominate Sigourney Weaver for her impressive acting in The Ice Storm
Who would you have taken out?
haha nice question. I'm nobody to judge these amazing actresses but I know 1 thing - Sigourney Weaver and Kim Basinger were my winners in that category
alex blend Couldn’t agree more with you.
alex blend But I love Julianne Moore in Boogie Nights. No doubt it was one of her best performances throughout her career.
agree
Kim Basinger is an excellent actress. A well deserved Oscar. I also think "Blind Date" is one of her best performances.
Thank God she got away from Alec Baldwin.. she deserved better,
She was just to die for in that role… STUNNING! I personally sympathize with her because she has an anxiety disorder, not easy ! You can tell by seeing her reaction and Alec Baldwin who was kind of expecting the worst! 😱
Montreal 🇨🇦
Love the way Jack Nicholson stood up and congratulated her 3:41. Brief Batman reunion and blessings from the Joker.
I think there was a reason they put Cuba Jr right at the beginning of the show.
Me too. I love Jack.
They almost always lead with the supporting actor awards.
Very gracious and sweet.
I would have voted for Julianne Moore. Her performance was heartbreaking.
Same, unfortunately her movie was probably too “much” for a majority of the Oscar voters. Plus her strongest scenes for toward the end of the film when most of the voters (conservative older men) were probably checked out by that point
Absolutely!! She was fantastic.
@@bryanalstoncoxing. Agreed. A coked out porn star and neglectful mother was probably waaay too dark and controversial for most mainstream Academy voters. I do think it was technically the best performance in the category though. Actually, I thought Julianne was at or near the top of her category 4 out of the 5 times she was nominated, the exception being The End Of The Affair, which is the film in which I think she looked the most beautiful.
Why is no one mentioning Julianne Moore?! She was the BEEEEEST out of the bunch. Totally!
Yes she was. Phenomenal in a role that was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy member, especially 25 years ago.
This one was a total popularity contest. We all know that Julianne really deserved this.
100%. Flat out phenomenal in a role that was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
Damn, these five women were excellent. Excellent!!!!
KIm is such a class act and yet so real. She more than deserved that oscar.
I really like her, and she gave a great performance in LAC. I think Julianne Moore’s was technically better. I think her portrayal of a broken, coked out porn star, neglectful mother, yet den mom to a group of “circus freaks” was both too controversial and risqué for the typical Academy member, especially 25 years ago.
All excellent performances. Would have loved if LA Confidential won best picture. Also, Alex's yell from the audience whrn she stated to speak. Weird that moment popped into my head. Had to come back and watch. 2020
LAC for Best Pic! Julianne for Supporting!
Honestly I wouldn’t have been mad if Joan Cusack took the Oscar 😂
3:40- Jack the Gentleman.
I will say, Kim looked STUNNING this night!
She looked perfect. Terrific choice of dress and hairstyle, even if her performance wasn’t technically the best in the category. Julianne’s was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
Loved Minnie drivers performance
I think Gloria deserved it.
She wasn't too much time in the film, but her moments were really touching and breakhearting.
🤮. Worst in the category. Would have been a mercy win. Julianne turned in the most technically riveting performance, albeit it too controversial and risqué of a role for the average Academy member to vote for, especially 25 years ago.
3:44 we can see Vicky Vale Kissed by Joker 💞
#Kim 🥰✌
#JusticeForJulie, who turned in a far more complex and phenomenal role which was simply too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
умница, красавица. наконец-то. И как Алек рад за неё
Beautiful dress and colour.
Where do you find the whole ceremonies?
Kimila "Kim" Basinger was born in Athens, Georgia on December 8, 1953. She will be celebrating her 71st birthday on December 8, 2024. She has garnered acclaim for her work in film, for which she has received various accolades including an Academy Award, a Golden Globe Award, a Screen Actors Guild Award, and a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. . In 2011 Los Angeles Times Magazine ranked her third on the "50 Most Beautiful Women In Film". For her femme fatale portrayal in L.A. Confidential (1997), Basinger won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress.
have you seen young rose sitting next to old rose?we ve been conned
I was in the press room at the awards the night Kim won her Oscar as a part of the press and was able to ask her a question ❓
What did you ask her?
@@eoinMB3949. How on earth did you beat Julianne Moore’s riveting performance in Boogie Nights??
@@paulvoorhies8821 Dude, why do you keep going on and on about Julianne Moore? This was Kim's night and she deserved it because she was better by far. It's really classless typing in every single comment too. This is Kim's win.
@@vaskylark. It was indeed Kim’s win. I wonder how it has aged though. Oh, wait; I actually don’t…..
The thing that stuck with me after that movie was her voice. The Academy made the right choice here.
2nd best to Julianne, whose performance, I think, was technically the best but far too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago. Kim wins for best dressed and hairstyle, hands down!
@@paulvoorhies8821 No it wasn't. Boogie Nights was a big movie and I lived the times. I thought the movie was hyped too much if anything and I thought it would be better. It wasn't a good movie. Julianne was good but she was hardly great and Mark Wahlberg's acting was terrible.
@@vaskylark You are certainly entitled to your opinion. LA Confidential was a “bigger” movie than BN upon its release. What’s your point with that?
@@paulvoorhies8821 Boogie Nights was promoted everwhere. It was hailed as the next Saturday Night Fever, which it wasn't. It certainly wasn't too risque for it's time since all of Hollywood was pushing that crappy movie out.
And to think this could have been Pamela Anderson 😂
Sigue siendo hermosa...KIM....era mi sueño ..aun la recuerdo...criatura preciosaaaa..
I would have given it to Gloria Stuart
Why on earth??
Out of pity cause she's old? That's not based on merit
@@elizabethchwakanowski5067
Total mercy f%ck that would have been. It should have gone to Julianne, whose phenomenal performance was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago. I thought Stuart was the worst in the category. Totally overhyped melodrama.
Gloria Stuart should have won
🤮. Totally overhyped melodrama. Julianne was phenomenal in a far more complex role too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
It gets worse - Helen Hunt wins Lead Actress.
Stawp. Julianne should have won, as she was phenomenal in a much more complex role that, unfortunately, was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
He's adorable.
5. Minnie Driver in Good Will Haunting
4. Joan Cusack in In and Out
3. Julianne Moore in Buggies Night's
2. Kim Basinger un L.A Confidential
1. Should haven won Gloria Stuart in Titanic
No way!
@@zoofiesta 👍
Shoulda been:
3
2
5
4
1
Una genia total
Why does Cuba gooding jr. present the award for best actress in a supporting role?
She was dressed like a winner. This is how you show up to the Oscars. She deserved that win.
She’s absolutely the best dressed. That’s for sure.
Julianne Moore was fantabulous and was absolutely robbed. The utterly transfixing and human way in which she portrayed a porn star is just magnificent.
100%. She was phenomenal. Unfortunately, the role was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
Did you see Kim Basinger in LA Confidential? I saw both and I thought both were good but Kim stole every scene she was in and so deserved the Oscar. She was better than Julianne.
Julianne should’ve won!!
Kim Bass Singer 🎤🎶😂
@nickxero2740. More Julianne, please!!
Joan Cusack, your turn is next. Gloria Stuart is NO longer with us and Minnie Driver is in question since it was her 1st nomination. I watch her show "Speechless".
And Julianne’s already finally won, even though she gave the best performance in this category. The role was just too controversial and risqué for the average Academy member, especially 25 years ago.
I'm confused....wasn't she the lead actress in that movie? Why would she be nominated for supporting actress?
She has only 15 minutes of screen time. The film is 2 hours, 18 minutes long.
She deserved this one since in every scene she was in, she commanded it. That's how strong it was. Gloria would have been nice too but it was Kim's year.
2 words: Julianne Moore.
@@paulvoorhies8821 Julianne was good but she didn’t command. Just watch both back to to back to see what I mean. Burt held the supporting role there too bad the academy discriminated
@@elvisleon754 i actually thought Robin Williams was better in Good Will Hunting than Reynolds was in Boogie, so I was fine with that. I’ve seen both films numerous times, and it’s obvious to me that Moore gave the most riveting and complex performance in the category. I like Kim, and I loved LAC-thought it deserved Best Pic, but you’ll never get me to believe that Kim gave a better performance than Julianne. We’ll have to agree to disagree there. The fact is thst Km was the most popular name in the category that night, and we all know how well-loved Alec Baldwin was in the Actor’s branch of the Academy. She was expected to win and did. I think it’s telling too that Julianne went on to be nominated 4 additional times (winning once) over the years. Also interesting is that in the film community exists an organization that hosts and presents the “20/20” awards. That is, films and performances from 20 years ago are revisited and reconsidered in each and every Oscar category, with the benefit of 2 decades of hindsight behind them (hence the name 20/20). Guess who won Supporting Actress at the 2018 ceremony. Guess who didn’t even make the final 5 cut??
The only Oscar Titanic didn't won.
Kate was also snubbed for Best Actress
@@doodlemunch2774. It didn’t win many, and it shouldn’t have won this one. Julianne was phenomenal in a far more complex role which was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
This was the worst Oscars ever. No one who won deserved to even be nominated
You mean Julianne Moore, right??
@@paulvoorhies8821 Julianne is brilliant. Always.
best
Julianne? I couldn’t agree more.
The oscar should’ve given to Gloria Stuart. She is the most deserving in the bunch. I saw the LA confidential. Her performance is great but not great as Gloria’s performance.
Maria Velona Sol was that you? You dont need to say who you are😂
🤮. She was the absolute worst. Would have been a complete mercy f%ck. Julianne’s performance was phenomenal in a role that was far too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
Cutest acceptance speech ever
Moore should have won
100%. She was phenomenal in a role which was simply too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, particularly 25 years ago.
Not a fan of this win but baffled that peoplewould have rather given it to someone for sitting and talking, particularly with those other three performances!
Julianne was absolutely phenomenal, in a role that was far too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
Thought it was zzz🙂
Julianne all the way!!
Eh....I always wonder what the politics were at the time...she def was the worst (out of this bunch). Joan Cusack would have been great, Julianne probably should have won.
100% Julianne. She was phenomenal in a far more complex role which unfortunately was too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago.
The least deserving winner of all time! Should have been Gloria Stuart
This should have been Joan Cusack vs. Julianne Moore, but Debbie Morgan from Eve's Bayou should have been nominated.
Correction: this should have been Julianne’s, but the role was far too controversial and risqué for the average Academy voter, especially 25 years ago. And, as we know, Alec Baldwin’s popularity with the acting branch back then was off the charts.
@@paulvoorhies8821 Yawns. Dude you got some weird obsession going with JM and nobody is allowed to like Kim Basinger's performance either. KIm beat all of them because she was beautiful and stunning and she commanded the screen like an old Hollywood actress. Julianne played a coked up porn queen who was having sex with teenagers and who left her child for a life of drugs and sex. Kim deserved the win and was better. LA Confidential should have won best picture as Roger Ebert called it the perfect movie in every way and he was right.
Where do you find the whole ceremonies?
Julianne Moore all the way!!!