GX-100 & GT-1000 (Same Settings Sound Examples)
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 08. 2024
- Today we take a look at 3 sounds I use live and compare them on both units. Same Input, output, master and all fx blocks and IRs.
Instgram ► / jaredgunston
** Support the Channel **
Subscribe Today! ► goo.gl/BaM7ng
#JaredGunstonTV #Producer #CZcamsContentCreator #Guitarist #GuitarTone #GuitarTips #Distortion #GuitarSoundForLive #GuitarSoundForRecording #StudioGuitarist #Vocalist #VocalEffects #VocalCompression #BossArmy #RolandPlayer #GX-100 #GK-3 #GR-55 #GT-1000 #GT-1000core #SY-1000 #VE-500 #Pocket-GT #VocalWireless #GuitarWireless #HereToHelp
--- CONTENTS of VIDEO --------------
0:00 Intro
1:18 GX-100 Clean
1:50 GT-1000 Clean
2:16 GX-100 Clean
2:40 GX-100 Mild Overdrive
3:14 GT-1000 Mild Overdrive
3:40 Some Thoughts So Far
4:19 MILD OVERDRIVE "GX-100 SAME IMPULSE RESPONSE"
4:58 MILD OVERDRIVE "GT-1000 SAME IMPULSE RESPONSE"
6:22 GX-100 High Gain
7:10 GT-1000 High Gain
8:05 LOAD BOGNUR CABINET TO BOTH
8:20 HIGH GAIN "GX-100 SAME IMPULSE RESPONSE"
8:54 HIGH GAIN "GT-1000 SAME IMPULSE RESPONSE"
9:24 Closing Thoughts
Thanks for watching, I do Gear Videos, ways of thinking about getting bigger sounds from smaller setups, and the odd DAW guide.
Join my Social Networks:
Instgram ► / jaredgunstontv
Facebook ► / jaredgunston
Twitter ► / jaredgunstontv
Homepage ► www.jaredgunstonTV.com
** Support the Channel **
Subscribe Today! ► goo.gl/BaM7ng
Buy My Original Music
iTunes ► goo.gl/R1L2wS
Spotify ► goo.gl/ZXjTSj
Also on, Google Play, Apple Music, Napster, iHeartRadio, Pandora, Amazon, MediaNet, ClaroMusica, Saavn, Tidal.
#JaredGunstonTV #Producer #CZcamsContentCreator #Guitarist #GuitarTone #GuitarTips #Distortion #GuitarSoundForLive #GuitarSoundForRecording #StudioGuitarist #Vocalist #VocalEffects #VocalCompression #BossArmy #RolandPlayer #GK-3 #GR-55 #GT-1000 #GT-1000core #SY-1000 #VE-500 #Pocket-GT #VocalWireless #GuitarWireless #HereToHelp - Zábava
IR COMPARISONS: czcams.com/video/Pozhu5UKIVM/video.html
Hello. Excellent demo, as always. The difference in EQ/sound between the two units is VERY obvious, with the CORE having the strong peaks in the highs, and the GX having a warmer character with the lows and low mids. This leads me to believe, however, that maybe the CORE would cut through the mix better in a band mix or live setting when played with other instruments, while the GX might sound much more pleasant at home. Maybe one day we'll see a demo with a band mix comparison. Thanks again!
Thank you sir. I'm getting the GX now. 👍🤘
Getting mine tomorrow just looking at videos to justify my purchase lol. The GX100 does sound warmer on its own without the fizziness. Will find out how it works in a band or with my backing tracks. Thanks mate!
Great job on the demo! Subbed.
Thank u 👍😊
Great comparison. The GX seems warmer. I will say there is a top end clarity on the GT. I believe the difference is the different AD-DA converters. The GT is 96k where the GX is 48k converters. I had a similar experience when I put my RV-500 on my board. It has the same 96k converters. There was an instant high end frequency clarity that I never heard come out of my gear. They both sound great. When it comes to the digital realm the bit depth and frequency rate make a huge difference. 👍👍
Great work. 👍😎😃🤘
Thanks 😊 #staysafe
Cool vid man
The difference between the two is likely how they are EQ’d. I’m more and more convinced it’s all down to EQ.
Differences between IRs? Fix with EQ
Differences between amps? EQ, and it’s placement relative to gain stages.
Generally it’s all about EQ.
In my oppinion the GT-1000 is more defined and detailed. Booth awesome.
Cheers from Portugal 🤘🍺🇵🇹
It sounds huge, lovely. Mind sharing how you recorded.
In the amp output settings, I see selections specific for tube input and return but not for solid state unlike the GT1 which is somewhat general and not specific to tube or solid state amps. That being said, 4 cable method is the only alternative? Thanks much Jared!
Well, it's a way of looking at it.
The gx has a rich bass, while the gt can be interpreted as thin.
The gt is articulate, while the gx is warm.
I guess it's a matter of taste.
All things being equal, I much preferred the audio out of the GT Core. The GX-100 seemed woollier in the low end and lacked bite up high.
The pedalboard real estate skirmish sees the Core victorious also.
I'm usually found in close proximity to my full stereo rig or a wet/dry/wet setup if I'm feeling particularly masochistic.
The dual send-returns on the Core would see much use. Another win.
I'd like a touch screen, but not at the cost of audio clarity.
GX-100 sounds better to my ears. The cabs sound woody and real (can be made to sound less so if that's your thing). GT sounds brittle and definitely needs more EQ.
For context (not that it matters) I've been playing 45 years so I know what tone I'm aiming for and last weekend I bought a GX.
My gig rig back in the day was a Les Paul into a JCM800 full stack with a few pedals on the floor. Those days are long gone but I've spent the last 15 years chasing that sound in a more 21st century (and less antisocial) way and it looks like I've found the solution.
Great video - thanks.
Update: Still have same comments but, GT with a bit more EQ is equally awesome. But to sum, they are very similar but quite different in application. 😎
Both are good equipment.
As far as sound goes, the gt is more high fidelity and resolution.
This will be a boon especially for spatial sounds.
However, it may not work so well in some aspects of driving sounds.
The gx-100 is right for me.
I am satisfied in many ways: sound quality, price, versatility, ease of use, clarity, visibility, and design.
I think it is a masterpiece.
Wow what a difference in sound! I personally prefer the GX sound over the GT. The GX has a full sound were the GT is sharp and lacking.
Patch 2 was vastly different even after you changed IR could be a slight EQ thing?
Patch 3 sounded muffled compared to GT1000 or to me completely different patches and uses
Can anyone explain the Exp1 switch on gx100?? I can't get mine to work
Great Demo, as always . Signal chain, audio (line) output through bluetooth?
- Finally got the Boss Katana Artist MkII-
Request: Rig ; Artist MkII/GX-100 vs.
Artist MKii/GT-1000 core vs. Artist MKii.
Thank you for all your uploads.
Very interested in your futher uploads on the GX-100.
GX-100 would be a nice addition to any Katana. Give you more flexibility, tones, and effects.
@TheCyberMantis that would be a nice upload. To hear the amp and pedal sound together.
If you use quality power conditioner the high freq will clean up nicely...
the gx-100 sounded like it was coming from the next room and I was listening through a pipe. Good comparo. Thanks.
Think I like the 100X. I sold my GT1000 awhile ago but I did like it. Just wanted to try something different
Ye me too
i think if you eq'ed the gt-1000 it would sound just like the gx-100 or vice versa. i like the way you can load effects from the palette on the gx-100. i have a gt-1000 on the way i hope i like it. been using analog pedals with my 68 princeton reverb ri and want to try the gt-1000 on it., also with headphones.
Yeah many agree with your statement. I honestly just think your ears will tell you what you like and since I've always digged darker tones I enjoy the GX. I still got my core. Both great devices ✌️
Are those factory presets or did you create them?
there is a top end to the gt thats not natural and sounds strange or digital to me. you get use to it but its not a good sound to me. i use hicut around 6.3k and that seems to fix some of it. this seems to be normal for most digital pedals that ive used even my 90's digital korg pedal. maybe i would like the gx100 better.
Do you think the guitar pickups could also help determine the choice.... because in my experience.....i have and SG and a tele....and SG is more generally dark and muddy, while the tele is bright.....so when you think of the harshness of the high ends on the CORE....may be the SG would help balance that while the tele would make those loud highs even more harsh?!?!!? Would like your opinion on the same as im primarily a rhythm guitarist and do a Lott of riffs and chugs and not much leads and solos
Defiantly. But when comparing tones it came across as harsher in general. Just by the way I went back to revisit my core and after eqing out the harshness I still love the core. GX is something very special though. But the purpose was to compare same tone which worked on my tele on both devices. One is definitely brighter then the other. Hope that makes sense I think both are equally programmable to a person's needs I wouldn't be upset if I only had the one and not the other 🤘
@@JaredGunstonTV thanks for that, so I'm just laying my requirement.....my old trusty DigiTech GNX died....and I'm looking for an option that has great 'out of the box' tones that i can play live through a DI onto a PA or cabinet with the said SG guitar...and at home, connect the outs to my audio interface and record onto my DAW.....i don't quite have the bandwidth to tweak and craft my own unique sound (I'm a rhythm guitarist primarily looking for great distortion tones for post grunge, nu metal, alt metal etc.)......based on this situation and constraint, which one would you more recommend more strongly?
Trying to get either a gt 1000 .. or. Gx 100. Or. Pod go.
Could you do a comparison between the pod go and the gx 100 ..
Asking cos I enjoyed your take betweenn the two units...
👍🏾
I would love to, but I don't own a podGo 🤣 podgo I have heard and it's a good unit too, but I've heard their are limits on the fx chain, not 100% on what it is, if I could find one I'd gladly do it tho. Thanks for watching man
@@JaredGunstonTV The problem in PodGo is that you'll only have 4 blocks to put any effects you want, the other blocks are fixed in "1 volume, 1 wha, 1 EQ, 1 FX LOOP (Send/return), 1 Amp, 1 cab (or IR loader). So you'll have 10 blocks, but only 4 really editable. I'm seeing a lot of videos of both of them, and I think GX-100 is more flexible in finding an unique sound for you, and GX-100 have more than 10 blocks (i think that is 14, but really dont remember).
THE GT-100X (My word i'm still trying to get these names stuck in my head) haha!
At least it’s not like memorizing Ibanez guitar model numbers😂
@@scottkindley haha true,
The Gx is newer I’m guessing they’ve refined it more since the 1000
No, the converter are better in the gt, and all the quality difference are in there
Hello there which one is the best for 4 cable method and has effects that sound and feel warm to the ears and hands.
4cable and send to FOH - gt1000. 4 cable and mic amp - GX. Personally I'm mad about the darker sounding GX , gt is a brighter sounding unit but only slightly.
The Core sounds more defined and articulate
it does sound that way on the video but in person it may be bright.
You have gone through the GT1000 and now the GX100. How would you compare the amp simulation to the GT100? Do you feel/hear the difference? Is AIRD a mark difference to COSM?
Massive difference.
ps. The GT-100 will always be a CLASSIC, and today you could probably improve it with the aid of an IR loader in the Send/Return. But... it will always be a 2d Image to me in sound, and the GT opened me to the world of IRs and making sounds feel responsive... now with the GX if found the processor that i personally enjoy the most (thus far!) - alot won't agree with me and will stand tall on the GT AIRD, and that's fine. I too love the GT. It's like having a discuss with a nuMetal fan vs a Death Metal fan. They both heavy... just different tastes for different ears. haha! Cheers!
@@JaredGunstonTV Thanks 👍
@@JaredGunstonTV 🤔 so are you saying that the inbuilt IRs can't do the job?
@@wandido2001 wahahaha!! no there are plenty of people who LOVE and will fall on the sword for the inbuilt, and in its defence i could program a sound i was PRETTY HAPPY WITH, but my IRs are very special to me - I have 3 that i constantly rotate between depending on my mood venue or gig. So I wanna be a hint sharper, more throaty or have a spice to my mids. I went down the IR route a long time ago and settled on these 3, probably around 2-3 years ago, and since i have never shifted.
I liked the GT-1000 tone a bit more, the GX-100 sounds a little boxy/darker (with around 200Hz peak and 6kHz High Cut),
where the GT-1000 is a little more high mid defined/crisp, but they are both a small notch tweaking away from the same, difference maybe a difference in the AIRD DSP coding being 'newer'.
I like the look and layout of the GX-100, and the new free effect selection looks great !!
Thanks for Sharing !!
Yeah obviously IR dependent, but some guys will prefer a sparklier ir or a brighter tone I've always liked a darker tone. You can hear the warmth in the clean, that's without any amp block on. And that's why I say flagship to some, a downgrade for others it's really relative to your personal taste and pedal requirements etc. ✌️
Oh and I do a high cut at 8k and usually an ea cut around 6.3. and low cut at 80 and sometimes as high as 120 source dependent again.
Hi does this gx-100 handles third party ir’s good?
It does
Hi guys! I am after the one that is most easiest to use and simplest. GX 100 is that the best options?
Same brain in both but I'd say GX is more user friendly
The GX100 sounds more compressed and mid-focused to my ears. As if one of these new Mastering-FX of the GT-1000 is permanently on.
Mastering fx are great 👊
I m suffering from the harshness of the gt1000 for several month i failed to find a smooth distortion the sound is so brutal do you think the gx100 will solve the problem?
Try some ribbon mic IRs first. My fav is 121 mic on a bognur greenback or a Friedman greenback
or change the irs to smooth out the tone
Yes, low fidelity vs high fidelity, the gt preserve more of the spectrum. It’s all! So the gx are not that low but the gt sound MORE, if you want you can make the gt sounds like the gx but non the gx sound like the gt.
I have both and i find the GT better and the GX setting have to be raised a good 20% to achieve the same sound
Just personal opinion, but... GX fits better my needs.
I don't have any of them. Still looking for a perfect solution. And I think I just found one.
For a lead guitar Core would be probably better. It has more clarity in it's tone.
However, I do a rhytm guitar. And I need more low and mid frequencies to keep my axe slightly hidden behind my lead axeman.
And GX seems to do the job.
i think in owning both and since time has gone by, you can definately fine tune each to get what you're looking for, i just personally enjoy the way the GX sounds without tweaking with my IRs. They're both amazing pedals and i'm considering changing back to the GT for awhile and building a new board for my current work.
The wireless isn't helping as you may know some channels are louder
That's odd as they're supposed to have the same tone engine. Was startled at how different they sounded.
Right? I've nailed it down to just the way the chips handle the IRs from third parties. I personally prefer the GX but use the GT live.
The gx has touch screen so more easy to work out .and expression pedal. But way bigger .but when are they going to start making them wireless. People are sick & tired of leads. U have wireless for guitar but I still have power leads and leads all over the floor
Hahaha boss have wireless units look up the WL60. 😉👍 And use something like the BCB-90x to integrate power and keep it all safe.
GT 1000 sounds like Katana speaker, GX 100 sounds like Waza Speaker :D TY JARED !!!
Great analysis cause I agree with katana, ie why I have an artist
I am super surprised about this tone difference. I expected they should be much more similar.
so did i... thats why i loaded a fail safe IR. I knew i heard a difference.
@@JaredGunstonTV I was listening to some Bogner amps reviews and GTK seems to be closer to a real amp. BUT: it is not possible to judge it without A/B/C comparison. But if there were the same settings and IR in the middle of Your video than I am really super surprised. I thought, that AIRD is some warranty of consistency. I do not complain I just wonder myself. czcams.com/video/twkXGIZmcAY/video.html
@@jarval2471 I think mic placement makes a difference on the IR too. If you check out the ML Soundlab channel and he comes real amp to his IRs they indistinguishable. But he has the perfect setup, the amp, cab and signal path matches. Real vs IR sound identical so I guess it comes down to how you dial in your preamp block. Cause some guys like it on the cone, slightly off or a few cm away etc 🤷 that's what I use resonance for it gives me the illusion of moving the move clearer or further.
Gt1000 core is similar to the flagship Gt1000 minus the buttons bluetooth and some ports. Gx100 is not but it has the touchscreen. Im expecting a gx1000 in the future.
Hi, my name is Ron.
Thanks fot this video!!
I think that the various video’s and comments on the GX-100, in particular the tone tests GX-100 vs GT-1000 show that this is a high level product. But personally I wonder which tone-/ sound differences I might expect between the GX-100 and the GT-1 (because I have one) or the GT-100 (both having many basics in common).
This is my situation: I’m using a Boss GT-1, connected to the clean channel of a Roland Blues Cube Stage amp and I play on an Ibanez 2395 (45 years old semi-hollow with super 70’s humbuckers) and a Fender American Pro Strat HSS. I play various styles and use original as well as altered (in Boss Tone Studio) patches. Problem is that a number of those patches with a certain degree of distortion sound rather harsh, impure, unnatural in my ears.
If the GX-100 is much better, then I would certainly buy one.
Totally different. I think something's not right here.
* Can you check the output settings, maybe they are not set the same.
* Can you use the stock 4X12 stock cab and not an IR.
* You USED the PHONES output on the GX-100. That I think has some high end rolled of as it is intended for headphones playing. Most multieffects like the old ME-series has that function. The GT-1000core doesn't because it has just one L (mono /phones) output). That may explain the high end being not as harsh. Just my theory.
Cheers!
I actually wanted to do a stock and patch build too. I've used my phone's output for years now can't say it ever bothered my on the gt either but it's a worthy theory worth diving into..
Oh sorry, it was recorded USB out on both, phones was for my personal monitoring. Blank patch and internal IR I'm keen to test.
The manual shows these two units can be combined, can't seem to find any videos about it
I hear the same difference, But I think the GT 1000 core would sit better in the mix.
"I like Turtles."
It's great but gt 1000 has that darkness I'm looking for,
So...the GX100 sounds better than the GT1000? 🙏😳
I prefer to say they sound different. But it just happens to sound nicer to my ears.
@@JaredGunstonTV It's so interesting - the Gx100 sounds dull and muffled to my ears whereas the Core is everything I need or want to hear - I guess I won't be trading!
I prefer the GT1000 Core, I have neither of these units, so no skin in the game ;)
They sound like my gt1. That cost few £. That weighs few lbs. That fits in my small gig bag. That .....
Oh, come on... They both have the same processing 32 bit core... All differences can be easily tweaked.
GX-1000 CORE…. what is Boss waiting for…
I bought both to compare. The GT1000 wins by a mile. If you can differentiate tones and sounds you’ll for sure be able to tell… for a beginner the gx is fine but for anyone who’s been playing for a long time, save the extra cash and get the big boy
I have both and honestly the GX just is so much more fun to use… and makes me want to play more
@@AutisticCuriositywhat about the sound quality tho? is it really a big diff? i’m torn between two
exactly you can definitely hear a difference each tones he is using from the gx and the 1000
Are they supposed to have the exact same audio engine?
It's AIRD in both... Just shows it's def a new gen of it.
@@JaredGunstonTV Thanks. So to be clear the GX-100 is not a sub par version of the GT -1000?
@@marconazz it's a simplified pedal to the likes of the GT, gt has more routing options and 2 fx sends and a variety or more options. The main limit on the gx is the 15 blocks or when you've filled a patch with enough reverbs it's gonna just stop you from adding blocks but it doesn't hinder the playability , latency or feel. For my needs it's an upgrade on sound and display, for others it may be a downscale for routing options.
@@JaredGunstonTV great thanks for the clarification. So it’s like a Helix LT basically. Amazing.
One more thing. The bit rate is 24 vs 32 on the GT1000. Some say it’s not a big difference.
I'm so glad I ordered the gx100 and not the full size gt1000 I'd be really disappointed with the 1000 after hearing this.
The 1000 sounds digital
The 100 sounds analogue fuller and warmer
Loving mine 😁
The difference is in IR.
Yes but at end I use same ir, I've redone It recently and still have same thoughts.
I prefer the gx 100 the gt 1000 has a colder sound
i can easily switch between the 2 and tailor the tones, i just found it interesting how the models each treated 3rd party IRs so differently. I LOVE the sound of the GX still to this day, but i'll use the core if I need to have a smaller profile board.
I bought gt1000core and just after i bought gx100 came out 😭😭😭
Can i make gt1000core sounds like gx100.
The gx100 sounds fuller on my phone's speaker ☺
You people are all nuts. These something called an eq then can get it sounding anyway u need it to.
Yup. Eq is my addiction in getting tones I like. My reason for sharing tho was I really enjoyed how different the units sounded. I personally prefer darker drive tones which is why I'm still using gx today.
GT1000 is more detailed and sounds like a recorded JCM800 recorded at the end of the chain of a Bob Rock recording… the GX100 sounds like a simulation of that on a N64 device.