T/Standard. Caveat Emptor, sux you find over half these issues after the fact. Shame on seller fir not disclosing obvious flaws. Triple suck on staining phenomenon. The guitar has seen obvious trauma. That geetar was not inexpensive. I'd be salty and left a negative review of said seller. Btw, good job on these videos. ✌️
A Chibson never lets you down😉 And yes, I’d say a partial refund is in order. He acknowledged that he knew the imperfections were there and didn’t disclose.
This is part of buying used guitars- you buy used to save money over buying a new one. If buyers are going to be so nit-picky about finish flaws, save everyone's time and buy new. Selling on Reverb isn't worth it anymore- there's a lower quality of buyer that is constantly playing the gotcha game with every little detail so that they can get money refunded.
@@TSB-pg6yo I certainly don’t nor do I ever expect “like new” when buying used. To your point I agree to an extent, but there are flaws and there are major issues that aren’t disclosed. I think my point is be overly descriptive on issues as a seller and cautious but realistic as a buyer. No surprises. Thanks for stopping by and taking time to comment.
@@brandonjackson5865 It doesn’t appear so. More like a botched buff job on the scratch parts. The straining I haven’t a clue. Thanks for stopping by and commenting!
@@PhoenixGuitars I thought the closeup looked like someone scraped it carelessly with a razor blade making the irregular scratches. So I thought maybe it was a botched attempt to relic and then they painted the edge or something . It’s hard to say for sure it should’ve been disclosed though and you’re correct to ask the seller to make it right.
Guitar was in a flood. The staining only goes up to where the water line was.
The guitar was not in a flood.
T/Standard. Caveat Emptor, sux you find over half these issues after the fact. Shame on seller fir not disclosing obvious flaws. Triple suck on staining phenomenon. The guitar has seen obvious trauma. That geetar was not inexpensive. I'd be salty and left a negative review of said seller. Btw, good job on these videos. ✌️
@@jimmychamberlain7382 Thanks buddy! Cheers
A Chibson never lets you down😉
And yes, I’d say a partial refund is in order. He acknowledged that he knew the imperfections were there and didn’t disclose.
This is part of buying used guitars- you buy used to save money over buying a new one. If buyers are going to be so nit-picky about finish flaws, save everyone's time and buy new. Selling on Reverb isn't worth it anymore- there's a lower quality of buyer that is constantly playing the gotcha game with every little detail so that they can get money refunded.
@@TSB-pg6yo I certainly don’t nor do I ever expect “like new” when buying used. To your point I agree to an extent, but there are flaws and there are major issues that aren’t disclosed. I think my point is be overly descriptive on issues as a seller and cautious but realistic as a buyer. No surprises.
Thanks for stopping by and taking time to comment.
Poor touch up paint ?
@@brandonjackson5865 It doesn’t appear so. More like a botched buff job on the scratch parts. The straining I haven’t a clue.
Thanks for stopping by and commenting!
@@PhoenixGuitars I thought the closeup looked like someone scraped it carelessly with a razor blade making the irregular scratches. So I thought maybe it was a botched attempt to relic and then they painted the edge or something . It’s hard to say for sure it should’ve been disclosed though and you’re correct to ask the seller to make it right.
@@brandonjackson5865 thanks for commenting and affirming.