Tucker is that one kid who thought he was smarter than the science teacher. Edit for all the Tucker defenders: Fox News once won a court case by arguing that no reasonable person would take Tucker Carlson seriously.
It's more like Tucker is the one kid who thought he was smarter than the science teacher, but he didn't do any of the homework and he failed every test, but still thinks he's smart.
@@thomasmacisaac1503 ...because the question is malformed and idiotic. I mean... "when would the next ice age have happened" was the dumbest thing I've ever heard, the look on Bill's face was priceless. It's like handing somebody a cake and then saying... "I'm skeptical that this is a cake, just a question... when would the eggs used in this cake mix have hatched?".
@@randomBBL I honest to god thought you meant Tucker Carlson for a minute... Or are you pointing out that even an "actor," as you say, knows more about simple science than ya boi Tuck?
What is your point humans contribute to like 0000.6% of o2 in the atmosphere witch causes climate change the planet releases tons of its own green gasses on its own causes its own climate change, climate change has never been predictable the planet does it itself
This is what it looks like to see a man so desperately out of his depth, and aware of it, trying his damned hardest not to look like an idiot whilst maintaining a solid position on something he knows absolutely zero about. This is really embarrassing to watch.
I do hope you are talking about Tucker. Big fan, by the way. What is most absurd is the lengths Tucker will go to in order to make sure Nye doesn’t get to finish making a point.
He was confused at the constant deflection and refusal to answer his question. But what more could you expect from someone who is not a scientist but plays one on TV.
He gave the answer several times, even varying it in example so that maybe, just fucking maybe, Tucker could understand. What the hell else could he want? To be transported back to the 1750's so he could see it for himself?? There was no deflection. He opening answered every question no matter how awkwardly worded Tucker asked them. And it was pretty clear to see that Tucker's 'confused' look was failed actor's attempt at looking pensive.
There was no debate about in this. This was Tucker putting his fingers in his ears and yelling at Bill Nye that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
he gave the guy literally 6 seconds to answer a question then impatiently moved on to a new question when he wasnt getting the answer he bullishly wanted.
He asked what the climate would look like without human activity and bill nye answered that it would be the same climate as it was in 1750 and gave examples of what would be different economically around the world. He decided not to acknowledge his answer because he gave a direct one that he did not want to accept and then belittled Bill Nyes credibility
@@cryptic_rain8951 The theory is that there's a definitive way to know what the climate would be today if there was no carbon footprint. The logic is that humans have pushed carbon dioxide into the air and carbon dioxide warms things up a lot. You can do an experiment. Take a plastic bag and wrap it around your head. Leaving no air holes. See if you can survive for long.
This is the CC for the whole thing. Thank you for taking the time to caption the entire show for us. You brave soul. (Sarcasm is present, but not aimed at you @Lucifer)
Bill is a sellout and looking for TV attention. Tucker is supposed to fight with Bill for drama. They're both just trying to generate attention. Bill's right, that saying climate prediction is super volatile. We can barely predict the current daily weather, but we can see the skews. Determining our direct correlation to specifics in climate is actually kinda tough given so many outside factors. Even looking at historical data as well as political games show all sorts of funk that could alter our current perceived impact. TLDR; the only thing interesting going on here is that it's news drama for the sake of click baits.
So you were able to gather the degree which humans have caused the climate to change? I didn't hear the answer please enlighten me. 100%? we know that's just not true, so what's the real number. When I hear "humans cause climate change". My first two questions are - 1.what exactly are we doing? 2.what degree of change is that (what we are doing) having on the planet? You really can't calculate one without the other. Bill didn't come close to answering those questions. Mostly he rattled off the effect of the climate changing - everyone concedes the climate is changing. Which brings us back to the two questions. They are having a circular argument because Bill refuses to answer the question.
I hate politics, one side is a bunch of pussys and the other side doesnt believe in science. Also the pussys don't believe in biology and are disgusting.
@@Demon_Lord_Coom you need to change your nick to "I am stupid" Because I don't buy your specific theory does not mean I don't believe in science. It means I think you have a BS theory. When one side keeps claiming the science is settled and we know their numbers are bogus and somebody stands to make a great deal of money and have an unprecedented amount of power if we believe them. There is not only cause but a responsibility for skepticism.
He is not answering the question. You don't say 100%. you id1ot. you provide a reference from a per review document. you provide the name of the author and provide the real numbers not 100%. As he said already climate always changes. Our part in climate change can not be 100% or 200% stup1d asshol3 because the climate always changes 100 or 200 % would mean that we are literally responsible for climate Change in general, and without us the climate will always be the same. he is talking out of his azs. Tucker is calling him out and you are so clueless you don't even get it.
@@bigverybadtom we’re not dealing with absolutes because we are converting math into human ecological impact, so it can very well be an unquantifiable 200%
Crunchy Gum more like Tucker: asks simple question. Bill Nye the engineer Guy: avoids and deflects. Tucker: pushes for answer Bill Nye the has no background and fails at basic science Guy: How dare you make me answer a question any grade schooler knows but I don't! Your anti science *thumps religious text that's been scientifically disproven by real scientists.*
That’s so weird… bill nye gives answers and then tucker Carlson doesn’t agree with the answers…. So he says bill nye isn’t giving him real answers…. What is going on
did we watch the same debate. Bill Ni the appeal to authority guy said he wants to imprison people who disagree with him then when tucker questioned him he started talking about grapes.
That was my take as well. He had to dumb it down to a lower and lower school age grade level for the ranting host who can’t be patient enough to hear an entire response
@@edwarddongres7866 Mechanical engineers have to take science classes, so they would understand the basics of science. The actual engineering classes then apply the sciences they learn to build things. So I think he's fairly qualified to talk about science.
@@wangstar No science class will show you the ice in the north till you actually fly over. I do often every time I fly to Thailand. Now where is the warm up again?
"Tucker takes him on in an unforgettable debate". What? That wasn't a debate. That was just a guy who has no idea what he's talking about shouting louder than the guy who actually does.
Bill Nye is legitimately an actor, not a scientist. Thats a tv show to assist in indoctrinating the youth. He obviously couldnt explain one of his so called "scientific" concensus "facts". You cant just say that it is and it does. Thats not science; that is scientism otherwise known as authoritarian bs. If you cant explain your position on something without just regurgitating that its an "established fact" than you dont know your position very well and are most likely a paid actor. Of which he actually is.
Nye embarrassing himself, doesn't have a single data point. The climate would be like 1750, when humans had been impacting the environment for thousands of years with millions of people burning wood for heat?? Interesting.
@@Darling137Carlson was trying to get ån Irrelevant answer he says “what is the rate and percentage of the change” where that isn’t Documented he wanted Nye to concede the point. The point Nye was preaching was that warming is accelerating. Carlson was clearly presenting a Strawman and not even trying to Listen.
@@IGotGills It's not a straw man and it's entirely relevant when proponents of a cause make very specific claims that X is happening because of Y. Tucker asks valid questions about metrics. If X is true, then tell us the details of the cost of ignoring our fighting it
@@Darling137If Tucker was right, why did he interrupt constantly and raise his voice every time Bill tried to answer his questions? That’s what people do when they’re out of depth in an intellectual debate. I bet Tucker couldn’t pass a 7th grade science test.
Except I doubt that Bill Nye himself reached out to the station to do an interview. They, most likely, reached out to him. So, if anyone is to blame for a poorly represented argument, it's the news network. However, they had an agenda to push, IE that climate change has little/nothing to do with humans and so they found someone willing to represent the argument that would fall short. Bill Nye isn't specialized in climate study. He has merely done "some" studying of it and drew conclusions. As we all do when we research something for a short period of time. The station prepared questions for Bill to answer full well knowing that he most likely would not be able to regurgitate numbers and statistical data. If anything, this showed Bill's tolerance for being lambasted in front of million of viewers and he took it in stride. It showed character.
if you think tucker really believes all the crap he peddles on FOX then you are just plain misguided. The same goes for any "news" anchor or host of any main stream media.
@@potatotomato6094 I mean all of those characterizations you just gave is the average conservative who thinks that all media is fake unless the president approves of it, coronavirus is a hoax because the president said so, the government is corrupt “unless it’s my political party”, a whole bunch of conspiracy theories and even conspiracy groups such as QAnon and so forth. Just because you didn’t want to attach the appropriate label to the characterizations you gave in order to seem unbiased doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t lol.
There is nothing to be gained from looking at percentages as your metric. Like, there is not a percentage of the changed climate that was caused by humans, it's not how it works. The more useful way of looking at it is to look at the change in rate of climate change
the only reason they have guest on this show is not to inform or hear a new opinion, it's just to talk over them and not let them speak then call THEM stupid and say see we won that debate because I called him dumb. it's like a kindergarten playground for adults. THIS IS WHATS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY! don't have guests if you never let them speak it's a disserves to everyone.
@@s1t2e3i4n5 It happens because some people are completely ignorant of healthy,😊 constructive communication techniques. So they misinterpret what is said by both participants. Oops! Sorry I used a 12 letter word.😊
Exactly I was just commenting to myself how fantastic the cameraman's work was. Psychology dictates that when you are losing an argument like that you have a lot of physical tells. I'm sorry Bill Nye I used to like you old boy but you're losing this argument pretty bad m
@@aidannolanlogansawyer9777 that's the irony of *ucker Carlson saying that he's bragging about having an open mind after refusing evidence and cutting the guy off so he can't refute the statement on open mindedness
"Is it 74.3% human activity that causes climate change?" -Tucker Carlson That right there, shows he doesn't even know what answer he wants. That itself, doesn't even make sense.
@@drabberfrog If you didn’t see the first 10 seconds, he wants to imprison anyone who doesn’t agree with his “theory” and saying engineer though is an appeal to authority
@@consciouspresence5880 you're right, him being a mechanical engineer is an appeal to authority, and Bill has made some pretty extreme comments about people who don't think human caused climate change is real. But I do think there is a reason Bill is smarter than Tucker, it's because Bill can do a very simple, but at the same time difficult thing which Tucker cannot. Bill can recognize scientific consensus and change his views accordingly. Over 99% of climate scientists agree that humans burning fossil fuels is causing climate change. And I will appeal to their authority because they have spent their entire careers studying the earth's climate. They know what they are talking about and if you think you understand the climate better than them as a non expert then I'd read a paper written by David Dunning and Justin Kruger. And at the end of the day, these are just two men talking about climate change on TV. Bill honestly didn't do that well in the debate because I have seen him debate against intellectuals and Bill definitely stands his own against them but against the science denying village idiot? He kept falling for the logical fallacies Tucker kept throwing at him because Bill wasn't prepared for someone use dumb, illogical arguments against him because intellectuals don't do that because they know they are stupid, and as Mark Twain said "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". And that is exactly what Tucker did when he kept asking what percentage of climate change is caused by humans because"the climate is always changing ". There's no number for something like that but Tucker knew that if he asked him a very specific question like that Bill would not know it and I'm not sure anyone actually knows it other than just saying 100%.
Tucker keeps asking "basic questions", but doesn't even understand the basics of climate change itself. Tucker wanted to try and make Bill Nye look dumb, but he made himself look like an idiot. Nye: answers questions Tucker: I'm open-minded, you are not. Nye: 🤨 (must be that cognitive dissonance i was talking about 😏)
@@magiccoleman6764 It makes me sad that people like tucker have such a wide platform. Imagine even thinking that you could get a simple answer to a topic as complex as climate change (even though Bill did what he could to make it bite sized). Tuckers metal capacity is so small, trying to explain that would be like ramming a tree into a pencil sharpener.
@@gondor532 he did give answers. The main point is that humans have speed up the time in which it takes for climate around the world to change. We would be in the position we are currently in in maybe another thousand years or so. But because of all the technology and fossil fuels we use, that change has come around in less than 100 years
Tucker isn't denying climate change at all! He is simply asking bill if human interaction has had any significant influence on climate change in which he bill can't seem to answer.
Tucker: “Ask honest answers” Bill: I don’t think you meant ask Tucker: I did mean ask. 🤣🤣🤣 he just arguing to argue because he has no argument. He even argued that he meant to say ask😂😂🤣
7:36 Nye is a popularizer of science. That is not a bad thing. Tucker interrupts guests trying to speak. We must look at the transcript to find Nye's answer. Nye said, "the climate would be like it was in 1750".
to the public that matters, which is any rational person it does. You climate cultists can group down vote and block comment this all you want. Science, time & nature are not on your side. You're over.
@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose well if tucker would've let bill finish all of his responses he would've already answered the question, he is trying to explain the situation and how they got to the answer before answering the questions, like most intellectual people do, unlike other people, it is important for one to do this when explaining a topic in science
Bill asserts cognitive dissonance is the problem and he’s correct. The comments in this thread prove it. Bill deflected questions with irrelevant bullSchiff like wine growing instead of answering it scientifically, such as what the average global temperature would be today if not for human activity. 🙄
Brick Tamland Now to be fair, Bill isn't a true scientist... However he might as well be with the amount of honorary scientific rewards he has. No joke, Bill is highly accepted as a scientific mind amongst the scientific community.
he asked him to what degree do humans affect climate change. then couldnt answer and said it was 100 percent. then goes on to smell his own farts and sway around his engineer title to end the argument.
True, and Tucker doesn't even have a science background! That's how bad Bill looked. Also, I like how people keep defending bill for being a "science" guy HAHAHAHAHAHA You guys need to stop being deepthroated by your childhood heroes. Bill says the science is settled! The biggest lie in the internet! It's like saying CNN is real news!
+Aaron Mendoza Well little boy, time to rewatch and educate. Here's a little guide for your underdeveloped mind. Tucker: The debate isn't settled, is climate change human caused or not? Bill: The debate is settled and it is human caused (see 90%+ climatology reports taken worldwide every year since 2007 for that answer to be explained) Tucker: To what degree is climate change occuring? (Question you want answered.) Bill: Well, instead of thousands of years, it's happening in decades. (You expected a percent, Bill gave you a different answer.) Tucker: To what degree is human activity responsible for that speed up? Bill: 100% Tucker: At what rate would it have changed without human activity? Bill: Here's a normal climate cycle. Think tens of thousands of years ago with the ice age. Now compare that to millions of years ago with the age of the dinosaurs...(bunch of facts about what time would be like if we lived in a similar climate, like being underwater)... But that's a million year gap. Tucker: You said thousands Bill: That's the ice age, I'm talking about the rate. There are a large people living on coasts (Remember those prehistoric conditions?) Tucker: What would the climate be like if humans weren't involved? Bill: The 1750's. (Proceeds to describe a world that would've been possible) IMBIue Those people include the majority of the scientific community who have graciously given Bill several honorary doctorates. Something that is unique in the community, but to be heavily honored, as his accomplishments have earned him that.
Tim Harris why couldn’t Bill Nye answer simple questions? What degree is climate change caused by human activity? Why can’t the scientist answer? Because they don’t know.
@@wq198mnr when u r such an inbred sumbfuck, you can ignore the answers and listen to the host shout over him in the middle 'WHY CANT YOU ANSWER MUH Q" and you drool and repeat it mindlessly in the comments LOL
Yea umm. I wonder..is he a genuine philanthropist?? Can someone make sense of that interaction. I think im right. I think he saying he loves people 🤔 or was that to make fun.
If Carlson has a different opinion opposing common science, I'd love to see his peer-reviewed journal documenting the rebuttal of the entire science of climate.
The "IDK what that means" at the end says it all. Tucker wouldn't let the man speak. That wasn't an adult conversation. Jesus that guy is something else. Poor Bill, did great trying to explain things to this over grown child.
kittypie i swear I made that up tucker 😂 I was high af man when I made it. I used to do that to my lil brother when he was younger. Don’t take it the hard way tucker.
@Reid Elson It's not about opposing anyone which, by the way, is a communist thing too. Being allergic or immune to facts. That's what happens when group identity is paramount. The left are commies 2020, they even turned on their own people. Like you did. =) It's about following the truth. No lefty can do that. They are, knowingly or unknowingly, following lies and propaganda. Nothing good *ever* came from the left, at least since WW2.
@Reid Elson They like make rules "based on whatever"(some kind of pretended science) without folks agreement. To get at least some agreement they spread lies..grew up inCzechochoslovakia
I remember when this video came out and the Republicans tried to spin it as Tucker “Owning” Bill. That couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s like watching a toddler try and argue with their pre school teacher.
John Peric So you’re suggesting that we’re in a warming period, but causation is linked between higher CO2 emissions and much higher temperatures. Humans are making a natural occurrence very extreme due to the CO2’s ability to reflect outgoing long wave radiation back into the earth. CO2 acts as a greenhouse that traps our heat in our atmosphere, hence the name the Greenhouse Effect.
As a scientific researcher and member of the scientific community, I feel bill nye could have done a better job at explaining. Sometimes you gotta explain these things in layman’s terms to other people because most people don’t understand it. The fact is the question tucker asked has no straight answer. The climate change rate without human intervention is not easy to quantify. There can be a thousand factors associated with it. Bill nye could have clarified that. In stead they went after each other.
Bill Nye is a TV scientist, the way Telly Savalas was a TV policeman. A real scientist would have come up with graphs and other hard data and Bill Nye provided none.
Soooo.... you have no idea how the climate changes because there are a thousand factors assiciates with it, but when the 1001st factor is mankind all of a sudden you know exactly what is going to happen and why? Also: would you agree to Nyes statement at 5:10 that humans prevented a new ice age? If so, do you consider that a bad thing?
@@wurstbrot1772please do some actual research. We could estimate it pretty well, but it is impossible to predict exactly what would happen. The climate is a chaotic system (look up the double pendulum and how even a tiny difference in input can completely change how it swings, this is an example of a chaotic system). To simplify, the main changes would be due to solar cycles (11 year periods of hot and cold due to solar activity), slight changes in the earth’s orbit and a yearly fluctuations due to different weather patterns (Look up the el nino southern oscillation), also volcanic eruptions have a slight cooling effect (can see some dips in annual temp due to this, it’s quite interesting. If we extrapolate these effects (extrapolation is taking data and estimating what it would be like in the future, it’s very simple, you can look it up, children are taught it in high/middle school (uk/us I think)) they would be very small compared to the observed change over the past few decades. Just look at any graph and see the increase since the industrial revolution. The evidence is there, the evidence is clear, all you need to do is look into it. You can even look at scientific papers on the subject (use google scholar, although I’d recommend only looking at the abstract and conclusion, they use a lot of technical jargon, science and maths that is difficult for non specialists to understand. But if evidence doesn’t interest you, I ask you this. Who has more to gain from lying, Tucker, a rich right wing presenter who relies on support from his climate denying base, or scientists who are looking at evidence to try to answer a question. You seriously don’t think that if scientists found climate change wasn’t real, they wouldn’t report on it? They would. I hope you look into it. This mindset is why we have antivaxers (the autism paper had falsified data, and was produced by a conman paid to diacredit the mmr vaccine so a company could sue them. He also released his own vaccine after releasing the paper on gut disease causing autism, caused by vaccines. Watch the hbomberguy video on antivaxers if you are one, the founder of the movement was a truly evil man who even paid children at a birthday party to draw their blood (he boasted about this and it was caught on camera)). But that aside, I hope you and others like you can look into it, it’s just the future of the world at stake.
yours is probably the smartest comment. i see everyone, even "important" people just repeating what bil says and calling tucker names, when every respectable scientist would not call you evilz instead just go through the data WITH YOU! instead of saying "it's settled" when every sientific paper in the world starts and ends with "it isn't. we can't reasonably predict how the climate will evolve"
@Mary Charge To be fair, you sound as sure as a 5 year old identifying Luxembourg in geography class. And with comparable math skills, too. Anyone who knows how to solve 1/1 wouldn’t be asking if it’s a rate or not. Edit: maybe you’ll be better at tee ball after school. At least then your random swinging might land a hit.
@Mary Charge I didn’t think you were smart enough to see your own stupidity in stating his claim, then stating he has no claim. Edit: I still don’t think your smart enough to see your flawed argument and thought process.
@@subswithoutcontentvid_at_k exactly, the only difference was Tucker didn't ask Bill Nye how long it took to interrupt him, from the very beginning Nye was interrupting.
Quick summery, Tucker thinks 2+2=3. He gets cranky and throws a fit. It’s explained to him that it’s 4, but he can’t comprehend it. He has a huge tantrum and goes to bed 👍🏽
And Bill says, "I love you as a person more than life itself" and Tucker goes, "before the name calling begins" I mean I know toxic masculinity is his thing, but come on
I was literally about to write this, how can you expect someone to have an open and honest debate as he kept going on about when you don't even let them talk for six seconds.
@Dunxan Gilpatric....my that comment about "love you more than...." was starting the conversation with dishonesty. Tucker was getting flabbergasted because Nye couldn't answer. It's simple If the climate we have now is what it is solely because of man, what should it have been EXACTLY, because if you don't know, there's no way to know that it has changed solely because of man.
Absolutely the best moment of the video. Carlson's eyebrows raise and he grins briefly at having been slammed for his disrespect. Carlson's foundation was to gaslight and be the "reasonable" one. So when he foundered, he knew it.
@@privatename2426 improv actor amongst dozens of other things, tucker carlson is an elitist who acts like he’s working and asking questions for the people lmfao
@@privatename2426 Do *you* realize that he has a degree in mechanical engineering and studied at Cornell University and the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering? Not to mention his continual involvement in so many science related educational and advocacy things that I literally couldn't list them all in this comment, how is that not enough credibility for you? Plus, it's not like all of the stuff that he is saying is only his opinion and is only based on his research; he is getting his information from, I have honestly no idea how many, but a large number of sources of research that you are more than welcome to look up for yourself as well to confirm what he is saying, but considering how little bearing you put on his education I doubt that you think they are any more credible.
@Donald Ring Seriously? It's a saying that a large majority of people use, except for some who are religious. They aren't saying that they know God, it's just a phrase.
No. Tucker is saying you can’t know definitively what the weather would be like if humans werent affecting the climate. While you can predict and reasonably assume what the climate would be like without human interference, you cant be definitively sure.
@@Poopopotamusgaming no we didn’t actually have records of it happening, so we had to use fossil records to notice dips in populations and judging off of the patterns, it’s actually really easy to predict when it would’ve happened if there were no human intervention
Yes you can, that’s like saying if I throw a apple off a roof you can’t be 100% sure it will break, it will almost every time but there’s always a tiny tiny little chance it won’t,
@star cruiser oh did you do research on reliable and informational websites and study that topic for years or did you search up "Why is global warming real" and called it a day after the first website. Seems like the 2nd one to me.
star cruiser what evidence, do you mean about climate change? and if you do ask any scientist who studies it and they will give you more than enough evidence. you can also look it up, idk how that’s so hard for you to do
@star cruiser Do you know what greenhouse gases are or the ozone layer or did you not pass eighth-grade science? It must be infuriating to people who study topics for years and get people who claim they are wrong. Especially with doctors and scientists with COVID.
"What would climate look like if there weren't humans?" - "Like in 1750. (before industrial revolution) " "WOAH WOAH SLOW DOWN THERE, you are using a language of politics!"
11 11 ok I’m here to answer all your questions, as you can see Tucker was not correctly listening, the climate would be the same as it was in 1750, there is your answer, bill gave those other examples in order to represent how some parts of the economy would also be different.
11 11 if you have any other questions, please do ask me because climate change right now is one of the worlds largest problems and if people are not on the side of fixing it starting now they are dooming the future generation.
@@MilitaryRanger7 ... In 1750, they say CO2 was at 150 ppm. That is the bottom end of plant survival and therefore life survival on earth. In 1750, life on earth faced mass extinction. Then came the industrial revolution. I am sure that 1750 is not the model year to which we should return the atmosphere.
@@MilitaryRanger7 ... If today's CO2 level is 412 ppm, and if that is way too high, then what level do you propose CO2 will be the correct level? -- considering that 150 ppm and below equals a mass extinction event... These are the legitimate and relevant questions which Bill Nye does not address. Happily, you will be able to.
Chris Thompson ofc I know the answer, 300 ppm, that the the widely known recommended amount which we should be living in AT MOST. This can be achieved by 2050 by a variety of ways if you would like me to elaborate and explain. And also the co2 was not 150 ppm during the 1750, it was around 280 ppm which is probably on of the most desirable levels for human life.
The fact that the title is Tucker vs…. Shows that Fox News literally just wanted to put out content of division… it’s been exhausting at this point 😓 honestly
I am so sorry if you have to hear someone argue like this. If someone said “wait wait wait, slow down” to me that many times I would probably ask then if they needed me to break out the finger paints.
Basically every time Fox has a guest that isn't a hardcore conservative. They will invite on everyone from doctors to economists like Richard Wolff to various scientists and Bill Nye, and then talk over them the entire time. Only to at the end go "I am right but you are wrong but I keep an open mind unlike you *supposed* experts."
So when nothing is done sufficiently to "save" the Earth and essentially the Earth "survives" decades, centuries later, can the fear-mongers be sentenced, judged, etc fore trying to dismantle civilization?
What does it mean when scientists tell us we have to contain bovine burps………when there used to be millions of buffaloe ………burping? Did killing them off save our climate? LOL, science
pfft idc, i'd actually love for climate change to be proven wrong. Then we have nothing to worry about and we can all fight about other things like politics!
@@venomman ohhhh really I’m to stupid to understand okay tell me why global warming has been disproven 3 times in 30 years. Tell me why the Earth is actually cooling down. Don’t you ever call me stupid I’ll put you in your place in a blink of an eye
Tucker is that one kid who thought he was smarter than the science teacher.
Edit for all the Tucker defenders: Fox News once won a court case by arguing that no reasonable person would take Tucker Carlson seriously.
Of course cause the science teacher is always right and the student is always wrong
It's more like Tucker has an honest question that the "teacher" won't answer.
@@thomasmacisaac1503 Bill Nye did answer the question very well.
It's more like Tucker is the one kid who thought he was smarter than the science teacher, but he didn't do any of the homework and he failed every test, but still thinks he's smart.
@@thomasmacisaac1503 ...because the question is malformed and idiotic. I mean... "when would the next ice age have happened" was the dumbest thing I've ever heard, the look on Bill's face was priceless. It's like handing somebody a cake and then saying... "I'm skeptical that this is a cake, just a question... when would the eggs used in this cake mix have hatched?".
Not sure why Fox would post this. This is embarrassing.
Exactly, Science is a good thing and putting on an actor who goes on TV and pretends to be a scientist is embarassing.
@@randomBBL also putting an idiot who cant seem to understand anything a "fake" scientist is saying is even more embarrassing
@@randomBBL I honest to god thought you meant Tucker Carlson for a minute... Or are you pointing out that even an "actor," as you say, knows more about simple science than ya boi Tuck?
Embarrassing in a good way.
They are more transparent and honest than cnn
It's really hard to argue with someone who's smart, it's impossible to argue with someone who's stupid.
What is your point humans contribute to like 0000.6% of o2 in the atmosphere witch causes climate change the planet releases tons of its own green gasses on its own causes its own climate change, climate change has never been predictable the planet does it itself
I agree, bill nye is a moron
This!!!
Smh😂😂😂
Im both
"Im open minded you are not" LMFAOOOO
This is what it looks like to see a man so desperately out of his depth, and aware of it, trying his damned hardest not to look like an idiot whilst maintaining a solid position on something he knows absolutely zero about. This is really embarrassing to watch.
I want you to know that your salad fingers series scarred me. Love ya work.
You're referring to the host right?
Holy crap we have a god among us and n one realizes it.
David Firth I was thinking the same thing. This idiot needs to shit the hell up.
I do hope you are talking about Tucker. Big fan, by the way.
What is most absurd is the lengths Tucker will go to in order to make sure Nye doesn’t get to finish making a point.
"Tucker takes him on in an unforgettable debate" No, he just blathers like an idiot, interrupts, and looks confused for 9 minutes or so.
He was confused at the constant deflection and refusal to answer his question. But what more could you expect from someone who is not a scientist but plays one on TV.
He gave the answer several times, even varying it in example so that maybe, just fucking maybe, Tucker could understand. What the hell else could he want? To be transported back to the 1750's so he could see it for himself?? There was no deflection. He opening answered every question no matter how awkwardly worded Tucker asked them. And it was pretty clear to see that Tucker's 'confused' look was failed actor's attempt at looking pensive.
Honestly it was great seeing my childhood DEATROY a Fox News bitch.
PinkHairedFreak ikr
Tucker is a idiot
Whenever I'm feeling a little down, I rewatch this as it never fails to make me laugh.
Yeah, is more entertaining.
The crossfire episode withe Jon Stewart is funny too.
*rewatch
@@lamaripiazza5226 fixed.
It makes me feel worse
People who are losing a debate almost always raise their voice to compensate.
He must be a Trump supporter
😂😂😂
There was no debate about in this. This was Tucker putting his fingers in his ears and yelling at Bill Nye that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Clinton Lunn True. Loved that he finished by giving his two cents on these info leaks. Bill Nye woke af yo
he gave the guy literally 6 seconds to answer a question then impatiently moved on to a new question when he wasnt getting the answer he bullishly wanted.
He asked what the climate would look like without human activity and bill nye answered that it would be the same climate as it was in 1750 and gave examples of what would be different economically around the world. He decided not to acknowledge his answer because he gave a direct one that he did not want to accept and then belittled Bill Nyes credibility
How do you know whether or not there is no evidence to support it or not?
There was no debate about in this.
Can someone translate this sentence?
Poor Bill. He's having a battle of brains with an unarmed man.
Lmao
It’s logic vs theory.
@@cryptic_rain8951 The theory is that there's a definitive way to know what the climate would be today if there was no carbon footprint. The logic is that humans have pushed carbon dioxide into the air and carbon dioxide warms things up a lot. You can do an experiment. Take a plastic bag and wrap it around your head. Leaving no air holes. See if you can survive for long.
Tristan Vassar how are climate scientists making up eildly dofferent statements each year?
You realise that bill nye is an *ACTOR*
Why does Tucker Carlson always have a confused look on his face when he interviews people?
Thats the I'm really paying attention , thinking hard and interested look. So Tucker can act like he's fair. Which we know isn't true.
Seems like it might not be a look 🤣
This was a complete and unnecessary interview.
Science has the answer, people just need to read more.
The proof is in the data, Tucker.
Tucker was that one annoying white kid in the back who wouldn't shut up thinking he was funny..
Cheeto O and you're that one guy who brings race into the CZcams comment section. lul
Iron Man Kungfu ...... why does that matter?
@@ILoveTVShowsAndStuffbecause he's racist. That's the only people who care what people look like
Fox: why is the climate is changing
Bill: "answers the question"
Fox: I guess we'll never know.
This is the CC for the whole thing.
Thank you for taking the time to caption the entire show for us. You brave soul. (Sarcasm is present, but not aimed at you @Lucifer)
@quagmirefeels he did lol
Bill is a sellout and looking for TV attention. Tucker is supposed to fight with Bill for drama. They're both just trying to generate attention. Bill's right, that saying climate prediction is super volatile. We can barely predict the current daily weather, but we can see the skews. Determining our direct correlation to specifics in climate is actually kinda tough given so many outside factors. Even looking at historical data as well as political games show all sorts of funk that could alter our current perceived impact.
TLDR; the only thing interesting going on here is that it's news drama for the sake of click baits.
@quagmirefeels yes he did lol, if humans weren’t here the climate would be changing about a 1000xs slower.
@@mr_gamer2267 no he didnt
It would help if the reporter shut his mouth and let bill talk
u mean...and let bil change the subject.....
“ im asking you a simple question” continues to answer it in a way he doesn’t want to hear it.
So you were able to gather the degree which humans have caused the climate to change? I didn't hear the answer please enlighten me. 100%? we know that's just not true, so what's the real number.
When I hear "humans cause climate change".
My first two questions are -
1.what exactly are we doing?
2.what degree of change is that (what we are doing) having on the planet?
You really can't calculate one without the other. Bill didn't come close to answering those questions. Mostly he rattled off the effect of the climate changing - everyone concedes the climate is changing. Which brings us back to the two questions. They are having a circular argument because Bill refuses to answer the question.
Fails to answer it you mean.
Obfuscation is not answering
the camera man won this debate when he zoomed in on bill nyes lips
HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa
😂😂😂😂
I hate politics, one side is a bunch of pussys and the other side doesnt believe in science. Also the pussys don't believe in biology and are disgusting.
4:32
@@Demon_Lord_Coom you need to change your nick to "I am stupid" Because I don't buy your specific theory does not mean I don't believe in science. It means I think you have a BS theory. When one side keeps claiming the science is settled and we know their numbers are bogus and somebody stands to make a great deal of money and have an unprecedented amount of power if we believe them. There is not only cause but a responsibility for skepticism.
Who wants to see Bill Nye and Ben Shapiro debate.
Eminem Awol27 why so Ben Shapiro can talk about the science of selling houses that are under water
@@shockwavesyndrome6433 Or so he can make arguments that don't really matter. Or are just wrong.
Ben would completely embarrass him
@@HuyVu-lx1mf Can I get a link?
@@HuyVu-lx1mf Sorry, what's the excuse?
Tucker: “so how much is our impact?”
Bill: “200%”
Tucker: “but you’re not answering my question”
Really stunning to watch?what is stunning is your lack of a sence of reality about climate and its change
He is not answering the question. You don't say 100%. you id1ot. you provide a reference from a per review document. you provide the name of the author and provide the real numbers not 100%. As he said already climate always changes. Our part in climate change can not be 100% or 200% stup1d asshol3 because the climate always changes 100 or 200 % would mean that we are literally responsible for climate Change in general, and without us the climate will always be the same. he is talking out of his azs. Tucker is calling him out and you are so clueless you don't even get it.
This is not a valid answer. It cannot be more than 100% in this instance.
@@bigverybadtom we’re not dealing with absolutes because we are converting math into human ecological impact, so it can very well be an unquantifiable 200%
@@AtomicAtom87 But we are. You cannot fill a glass 200%. Use your common sense.
pulling out the stopwatch was crazy LMAO
Tucker: *Asks a question*
Bill Nye: *Answers Question*
Tucker: "YOU'RE NOT ANSWERING THE SIMPLE QUESTION"
Crunchy Gum It's funny, cause this is the reverse of Kellyanne Conway. Where she's asked a question and dodges around it.
Maybe thats becase he was not answering the fucking question
O-T -M He was very much answering the question.
Crunchy Gum more like
Tucker: asks simple question.
Bill Nye the engineer Guy: avoids and deflects.
Tucker: pushes for answer
Bill Nye the has no background and fails at basic science Guy: How dare you make me answer a question any grade schooler knows but I don't! Your anti science *thumps religious text that's been scientifically disproven by real scientists.*
ArgusOfNight if you call an obvious deflection and red herring response an answer.
I feel like fox is just a very elaborate Onion News joke
it’s not
best comment +1
If Only!
I am the 100th like :)
Also eat your cereal
Bill Nye looks like Clint Eastwoods nerdy younger brother
That’s so weird… bill nye gives answers and then tucker Carlson doesn’t agree with the answers…. So he says bill nye isn’t giving him real answers…. What is going on
did we watch the same debate. Bill Ni the appeal to authority guy said he wants to imprison people who disagree with him then when tucker questioned him he started talking about grapes.
Bills answers get more and more basic as he realizes the intelligence of tucker
That was my take as well. He had to dumb it down to a lower and lower school age grade level for the ranting host who can’t be patient enough to hear an entire response
Opinions. Mechanical engineer is NOT science teacher, he's TV entertainer.
@@edwarddongres7866 Mechanical engineers have to take science classes, so they would understand the basics of science. The actual engineering classes then apply the sciences they learn to build things. So I think he's fairly qualified to talk about science.
Any SPECIFICS?
@@wangstar No science class will show you the ice in the north till you actually fly over. I do often every time I fly to Thailand. Now where is the warm up again?
Tucker “👁 👁” Carlson
🕳
Lol why does he always make that face?
sarconi11 I would guess it’s because he is trying to understand what they are saying, but that’s just my guess.
laughed out loud. thanks for this
Tucker=🤡
I wish they had a butthole emoji.
Tucker just demonstrated his total unfitness to be a journalist of any sort.
I can feel the cognitive dissonance coming inside me 😩
Lol
"Tucker takes him on in an unforgettable debate". What? That wasn't a debate. That was just a guy who has no idea what he's talking about shouting louder than the guy who actually does.
FACTS!! 💯
Just like the presidential debates
@@redmosquito2173 one time biden roasted trumps response to the pandemic and called him bad a golf at the same time...madlad
Bill Nye is legitimately an actor, not a scientist. Thats a tv show to assist in indoctrinating the youth. He obviously couldnt explain one of his so called "scientific" concensus "facts". You cant just say that it is and it does. Thats not science; that is scientism otherwise known as authoritarian bs. If you cant explain your position on something without just regurgitating that its an "established fact" than you dont know your position very well and are most likely a paid actor. Of which he actually is.
@@jordyjustine he literally has degrees and is well respected in the scientific community. Try again.
The sad thing is that the average person watching Fox News thinks Tucker won the debate.
GunAndBomb thats the really sad part.
walliser15 ha!
walliser15 nope
Think God we have you delusional libtards to keep straight. SMFH, MORON!
Please go on, I'm curious about your drive by insult.
It's good to have conversations but not when one person is just trying to make the other one look bad. It distracts from the issue and from the truth.
I know, right? Nye exhibited no good faith and didn't even make an attempt to answer any questions. He undermined his own case.
Nye embarrassing himself, doesn't have a single data point. The climate would be like 1750, when humans had been impacting the environment for thousands of years with millions of people burning wood for heat?? Interesting.
@@Darling137Carlson was trying to get ån Irrelevant answer he says “what is the rate and percentage of the change” where that isn’t Documented he wanted Nye to concede the point. The point Nye was preaching was that warming is accelerating. Carlson was clearly presenting a Strawman and not even trying to Listen.
@@IGotGills It's not a straw man and it's entirely relevant when proponents of a cause make very specific claims that X is happening because of Y.
Tucker asks valid questions about metrics. If X is true, then tell us the details of the cost of ignoring our fighting it
@@Darling137If Tucker was right, why did he interrupt constantly and raise his voice every time Bill tried to answer his questions? That’s what people do when they’re out of depth in an intellectual debate. I bet Tucker couldn’t pass a 7th grade science test.
Bill is the perfect example of, im not a doctor but i play one on t.v lmfao
How's that
Except I doubt that Bill Nye himself reached out to the station to do an interview. They, most likely, reached out to him. So, if anyone is to blame for a poorly represented argument, it's the news network. However, they had an agenda to push, IE that climate change has little/nothing to do with humans and so they found someone willing to represent the argument that would fall short. Bill Nye isn't specialized in climate study. He has merely done "some" studying of it and drew conclusions. As we all do when we research something for a short period of time. The station prepared questions for Bill to answer full well knowing that he most likely would not be able to regurgitate numbers and statistical data. If anything, this showed Bill's tolerance for being lambasted in front of million of viewers and he took it in stride. It showed character.
You watched tucker carlson cry on tv but nah its Bill Nye whos stupid
if you think tucker really believes all the crap he peddles on FOX then you are just plain misguided. The same goes for any "news" anchor or host of any main stream media.
EXACTLY
Tucker: says something
Bill Nye: smiles painfully
@Jim Harol imagine being dumb
@@potatotomato6094 lmao true, that’s pretty much sums up the average conservative.
@@DemMyHouser didnt have to make it political but ok
@@potatotomato6094 I mean all of those characterizations you just gave is the average conservative who thinks that all media is fake unless the president approves of it, coronavirus is a hoax because the president said so, the government is corrupt “unless it’s my political party”, a whole bunch of conspiracy theories and even conspiracy groups such as QAnon and so forth. Just because you didn’t want to attach the appropriate label to the characterizations you gave in order to seem unbiased doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t lol.
I know, right? His mouth doesn't make that shape.
Talking over someone doesn't make you more right or your point more valid. Bill Nye wins
Connor CWC k. Which is why bill couldn't answer a simple question. I don't blame him for interrupting
He kept trying! But he kept on getting cut off!
Connor CWC bill could not provide...wait for it...EVIDENCE
Furher Coleman
Then you were clearly not paying attention. He said 100% percent at 3:34.
There is nothing to be gained from looking at percentages as your metric. Like, there is not a percentage of the changed climate that was caused by humans, it's not how it works. The more useful way of looking at it is to look at the change in rate of climate change
the only reason they have guest on this show is not to inform or hear a new opinion, it's just to talk over them and not let them speak then call THEM stupid and say see we won that debate because I called him dumb. it's like a kindergarten playground for adults. THIS IS WHATS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY! don't have guests if you never let them speak it's a disserves to everyone.
Huge mistake for Tucker to try and take on Nye. Made himself look dumb.
He doesn't need Bill to make him look dumb. He does a great job on his own
It's quite interesting how people can watch the same video and yet appear to have watched 2 completely different videos.
Mr Turkey doesnt just look dumb he is dumb.
@@s1t2e3i4n5 It happens because some people are completely ignorant of healthy,😊 constructive communication techniques. So they misinterpret what is said by both participants.
Oops! Sorry I used a 12 letter word.😊
4:41 thank you, camera guy, for giving us all what we really wanted.
Toori Baba quite random too. i was confused
Caught me off guard. Was getting pissed and just made me laugh real hard lol
Exactly I was just commenting to myself how fantastic the cameraman's work was. Psychology dictates that when you are losing an argument like that you have a lot of physical tells. I'm sorry Bill Nye I used to like you old boy but you're losing this argument pretty bad m
Johnny Boy not really bruh..
@@user-il5hy5tr5z and how's that?
"I'm open minded and you are not... and we are out of time" -Tucker Carlson
"If You Open Your Mind Too Much Your Brain Will Fall Off" ~Tim Minchin
The epitome of open-mindedness is telling other people they are not open-minded.
Really it's the other way around
@@aidannolanlogansawyer9777 that's the irony of *ucker Carlson saying that he's bragging about having an open mind after refusing evidence and cutting the guy off so he can't refute the statement on open mindedness
"Is it 74.3% human activity that causes climate change?" -Tucker Carlson
That right there, shows he doesn't even know what answer he wants. That itself, doesn't even make sense.
The intelligence gap between these two men is astonishing.
yeah one is part of the criminal democrat party
@@consciouspresence5880 the guy that actually knows what he is talking about? The mechanical engineer, the scientifically literate person?
@@drabberfrog If you didn’t see the first 10 seconds, he wants to imprison anyone who doesn’t agree with his “theory” and saying engineer though is an appeal to authority
@@consciouspresence5880 you're right, him being a mechanical engineer is an appeal to authority, and Bill has made some pretty extreme comments about people who don't think human caused climate change is real. But I do think there is a reason Bill is smarter than Tucker, it's because Bill can do a very simple, but at the same time difficult thing which Tucker cannot. Bill can recognize scientific consensus and change his views accordingly. Over 99% of climate scientists agree that humans burning fossil fuels is causing climate change. And I will appeal to their authority because they have spent their entire careers studying the earth's climate. They know what they are talking about and if you think you understand the climate better than them as a non expert then I'd read a paper written by David Dunning and Justin Kruger.
And at the end of the day, these are just two men talking about climate change on TV. Bill honestly didn't do that well in the debate because I have seen him debate against intellectuals and Bill definitely stands his own against them but against the science denying village idiot? He kept falling for the logical fallacies Tucker kept throwing at him because Bill wasn't prepared for someone use dumb, illogical arguments against him because intellectuals don't do that because they know they are stupid, and as Mark Twain said "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". And that is exactly what Tucker did when he kept asking what percentage of climate change is caused by humans because"the climate is always changing ". There's no number for something like that but Tucker knew that if he asked him a very specific question like that Bill would not know it and I'm not sure anyone actually knows it other than just saying 100%.
@@drabberfrog yes on this subject it was a verbose game of trivial semantics and no actual points were made in the debate or discussion
“To what degree?”
“It’s super cereal”
Tucker literally talked over Nye the entire time and all of a sudden the time is up... why are they like this.
Tucker keeps asking "basic questions", but doesn't even understand the basics of climate change itself. Tucker wanted to try and make Bill Nye look dumb, but he made himself look like an idiot.
Nye: answers questions
Tucker: I'm open-minded, you are not.
Nye: 🤨 (must be that cognitive dissonance i was talking about 😏)
@@magiccoleman6764 It makes me sad that people like tucker have such a wide platform. Imagine even thinking that you could get a simple answer to a topic as complex as climate change (even though Bill did what he could to make it bite sized).
Tuckers metal capacity is so small, trying to explain that would be like ramming a tree into a pencil sharpener.
Because they know they have no answers so they just shout .
Well if Nye tried to give concrete answer maybe he wouldnt get talked over
@@gondor532 he did give answers. The main point is that humans have speed up the time in which it takes for climate around the world to change. We would be in the position we are currently in in maybe another thousand years or so. But because of all the technology and fossil fuels we use, that change has come around in less than 100 years
this is literally just tucker carlson being unable to comprehend science for 10 minutes straight
literally he's so close minded
Literally, even a 5th grader could understand simple climate change on earth
Watch John Oliver's last week tonight about him came out yesterday
Tucker isn't denying climate change at all! He is simply asking bill if human interaction has had any significant influence on climate change in which he bill can't seem to answer.
@@christopherclan07 you right, wikipedia says, People are responsible for climate change only for 1%.
Tucker does that thing that all politicians do:
"Stop interrupting me"
"But i didnt.."
"Wait, wait, let me finish"
Man Bill Nye is absolutely amazing.
You should change your pfp, Trump mugshot commenters have a terrible reputation.
@@flamingpaxtsc lol nah, its funny to me
@bowler7922 You changed it anyways lmao
@@Republic_Of_Soraya yeah I got too many comments about it so I changed it to a picture I took on my trip to Rome
@@bowler7922 Thank you. That’s exactly what you should’ve done.
Bill: **explaining science**
Tucker: "SLOW DOWN, BEFORE WE START NAME CALLING..."
Facts
Nye literally didn’t answer Tuckers actual question and the things he did say weren’t even scientifically accurate.
@@chasepotter2376 did we watch the same video?
@@chasepotter2376 yea he did
Chase Potter Reeee
Tucker and Bill are the two spectrum of American intelligence
Stupid vs Can't Admit that They're stupid
@@arlaghdoth4434 logical vs they think they are logical*
@@arlaghdoth4434 Littearlly a scientist vs a biased person
You are wrong
Bill is the only intelligence
@@blamecyrbx4942 FACTS! 🙌
" that's a very ominous thing to say. I don't know what it means..."
WOW!
You know what it means now!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Tucker: “Ask honest answers”
Bill: I don’t think you meant ask
Tucker: I did mean ask.
🤣🤣🤣 he just arguing to argue because he has no argument. He even argued that he meant to say ask😂😂🤣
the conversation that broke bill nye’s hope in humanity
This conversation broke my hope in humanity
@@Yupper277 you had hope before 👁👄👁
Love how he timed how long it took for the Media guy to interrupt him
This made me lose hope I didn't know I had.
Facts
Whenever Carlson stop talking, he enters low power mode to extend battery life.
😂
lmao
LMAOO
you should put that on r/rareinsults
Lol
“There would of been an ice age without human activity”
“Oh when”
“That’s irrelevant”
😂
He doesn't even know the timescale of the last glacial retreat. Nye is a hack.
tucker is no better either. Climate change and global warming are both observable phenomena and he thinks like an 8 year old here.
@@tiramisu7544 but there’s no proof that anything we do can change it
@@midnightmcguire9897 we can slow it down or at least start to build seawalls around us like the dutch are doing…
@@tiramisu7544 Yeah but Nye saying there would have been one is all BS because he doesn't know. He made it up.
7:36 Nye is a popularizer of science. That is not a bad thing.
Tucker interrupts guests trying to speak. We must look at the transcript to find Nye's answer.
Nye said, "the climate would be like it was in 1750".
I wonder if Fox News thinks this makes them look good.
to the public that matters, which is any rational person it does. You climate cultists can group down vote and block comment this all you want. Science, time & nature are not on your side. You're over.
Climate cultists lol
8bingbang
H
+bigstrudel >says they're number 1 >bitches about mainstream media in other vids
Ignorance can be bliss, but just while it lasts. When truth finally settles in, the realization becomes a heavy burden.
Typical Tucker, so “open minded.” Just interrupt and talk over everyone that has something real to say.
Lol because people refuse to answer his questions.
@@hanslander2849 how so? Tucker asks irrelevant and off topic questions, the man clearly doesn’t come prepared 😂🚮
@@hanslander2849 because his questions are just deflecting blatant facts
Dude is a moron.
@@hanslander2849 Troll?
Dude had to measure how long it took for Tucker to interrupt him...
Tucker should have shown the clock on how quickly Nye evaded the question.
@@Dudemon-1the clock wouldn't have stopped, so that would've been a waste of time
Tucker "waitwaitwAitslowdownholdOnHOLDONSTOP" Carlson
Well, bill never answered Carlsons question, Bill was starting to talk about a different topic. Carlson was trying to stop him before so,
@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose bill literally had to dumb it down and give him examples of it
@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose well if tucker would've let bill finish all of his responses he would've already answered the question, he is trying to explain the situation and how they got to the answer before answering the questions, like most intellectual people do, unlike other people, it is important for one to do this when explaining a topic in science
@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose Bill answered the question, he just didn't answer it the way tucker wanted.
Bill asserts cognitive dissonance is the problem and he’s correct. The comments in this thread prove it. Bill deflected questions with irrelevant bullSchiff like wine growing instead of answering it scientifically, such as what the average global temperature would be today if not for human activity. 🙄
This is what happens when you have a Scientist talk to a Simpleton.
Brick Tamland Now to be fair, Bill isn't a true scientist... However he might as well be with the amount of honorary scientific rewards he has. No joke, Bill is highly accepted as a scientific mind amongst the scientific community.
ArgusOfNight you obviously have no understanding of the word scientist...
he asked him to what degree do humans affect climate change. then couldnt answer and said it was 100 percent. then goes on to smell his own farts and sway around his engineer title to end the argument.
True, and Tucker doesn't even have a science background! That's how bad Bill looked.
Also, I like how people keep defending bill for being a "science" guy HAHAHAHAHAHA You guys need to stop being deepthroated by your childhood heroes.
Bill says the science is settled! The biggest lie in the internet! It's like saying CNN is real news!
+Aaron Mendoza
Well little boy, time to rewatch and educate. Here's a little guide for your underdeveloped mind.
Tucker: The debate isn't settled, is climate change human caused or not?
Bill: The debate is settled and it is human caused (see 90%+ climatology reports taken worldwide every year since 2007 for that answer to be explained)
Tucker: To what degree is climate change occuring? (Question you want answered.)
Bill: Well, instead of thousands of years, it's happening in decades. (You expected a percent, Bill gave you a different answer.)
Tucker: To what degree is human activity responsible for that speed up?
Bill: 100%
Tucker: At what rate would it have changed without human activity?
Bill: Here's a normal climate cycle. Think tens of thousands of years ago with the ice age. Now compare that to millions of years ago with the age of the dinosaurs...(bunch of facts about what time would be like if we lived in a similar climate, like being underwater)... But that's a million year gap.
Tucker: You said thousands
Bill: That's the ice age, I'm talking about the rate. There are a large people living on coasts (Remember those prehistoric conditions?)
Tucker: What would the climate be like if humans weren't involved?
Bill: The 1750's. (Proceeds to describe a world that would've been possible)
IMBIue
Those people include the majority of the scientific community who have graciously given Bill several honorary doctorates. Something that is unique in the community, but to be heavily honored, as his accomplishments have earned him that.
4:41 that is just perfect Haha
Bill was the climate change expert for Lamar Alexander who predicted Manhattan would be under water right now. 🥴
Shouldn't you be glad they were wrong?
Nye: I love you as a person
Tucker: BEFORE WE START NAME CALLING
Tim Harris why couldn’t Bill Nye answer simple questions? What degree is climate change caused by human activity? Why can’t the scientist answer? Because they don’t know.
@BRO SKI
You’re joking, right?
@@wq198mnr when u r such an inbred sumbfuck, you can ignore the answers and listen to the host shout over him in the middle 'WHY CANT YOU ANSWER MUH Q" and you drool and repeat it mindlessly in the comments LOL
@@wq198mnr they do know and the vast majority of overall rising tempature is caused by us.
@@wq198mnr you shouldn't be allowed to speak your opinion anymore because its hurting people with common sense brains
Bill: I love you as a person
Tucker: ok before the name calling begins...
If someone says that about Tucker something's wrong
😆
That was just Tucker signalling that he was about to start the name calling.
U caught that too? 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣💯
Yea umm. I wonder..is he a genuine philanthropist?? Can someone make sense of that interaction. I think im right. I think he saying he loves people 🤔 or was that to make fun.
If Carlson has a different opinion opposing common science, I'd love to see his peer-reviewed journal documenting the rebuttal of the entire science of climate.
No need to rebut when Nye can't even state his position.
The "IDK what that means" at the end says it all. Tucker wouldn't let the man speak. That wasn't an adult conversation. Jesus that guy is something else. Poor Bill, did great trying to explain things to this over grown child.
Tucker: What is your name?
Bill: I am Bill
Tucker: No, that's who you are, but what's your name?
kittypie i swear I made that up tucker 😂 I was high af man when I made it. I used to do that to my lil brother when he was younger. Don’t take it the hard way tucker.
@kittypie Cry more.
Idiot
@kittypie well obviously it's wasn't that bad
I don’t get this joke.
“Without being shouted down by people like you!” shouts Tucker Carlson
I officially hate Tucker now, f*cking hypocrite
Tucker Carlson is right though and commie Bill is wrong. Climate threat was 100 % fake aswell. LOL
@Reid Elson It's not about opposing anyone which, by the way, is a communist thing too. Being allergic or immune to facts. That's what happens when group identity is paramount. The left are commies 2020, they even turned on their own people. Like you did. =) It's about following the truth. No lefty can do that. They are, knowingly or unknowingly, following lies and propaganda. Nothing good *ever* came from the left, at least since WW2.
@Reid Elson r/woooosh?
@Reid Elson They like make rules "based on whatever"(some kind of pretended science) without folks agreement. To get at least some agreement they spread lies..grew up inCzechochoslovakia
"Without being shouted down by you," Carlson shouts at a placid Nye
I remember when this video came out and the Republicans tried to spin it as Tucker “Owning” Bill. That couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s like watching a toddler try and argue with their pre school teacher.
If Tucker had a stroke live on air I don’t think anyone would notice.
Lol
I applaud this comment
Or care.
He’s not having a stroke?
Ok buddy
The look on Bill Nye’s face when Tucker asks when the next ice age will happen 😂
Michael TNK Yeah because he’s like “wow Tucker is such an idiot.”
Xi Jinping there was (i do believe human effected climate change btw)
Mitchell Rovit
I know
John Peric So you’re suggesting that we’re in a warming period, but causation is linked between higher CO2 emissions and much higher temperatures. Humans are making a natural occurrence very extreme due to the CO2’s ability to reflect outgoing long wave radiation back into the earth. CO2 acts as a greenhouse that traps our heat in our atmosphere, hence the name the Greenhouse Effect.
John Peric So are you claiming that humans have an insignificant impact on the temperature?
As a scientific researcher and member of the scientific community, I feel bill nye could have done a better job at explaining. Sometimes you gotta explain these things in layman’s terms to other people because most people don’t understand it. The fact is the question tucker asked has no straight answer. The climate change rate without human intervention is not easy to quantify. There can be a thousand factors associated with it. Bill nye could have clarified that. In stead they went after each other.
Bill Nye is a TV scientist, the way Telly Savalas was a TV policeman. A real scientist would have come up with graphs and other hard data and Bill Nye provided none.
Soooo.... you have no idea how the climate changes because there are a thousand factors assiciates with it, but when the 1001st factor is mankind all of a sudden you know exactly what is going to happen and why?
Also: would you agree to Nyes statement at 5:10 that humans prevented a new ice age? If so, do you consider that a bad thing?
@@wurstbrot1772please do some actual research.
We could estimate it pretty well, but it is impossible to predict exactly what would happen. The climate is a chaotic system (look up the double pendulum and how even a tiny difference in input can completely change how it swings, this is an example of a chaotic system).
To simplify, the main changes would be due to solar cycles (11 year periods of hot and cold due to solar activity), slight changes in the earth’s orbit and a yearly fluctuations due to different weather patterns (Look up the el nino southern oscillation), also volcanic eruptions have a slight cooling effect (can see some dips in annual temp due to this, it’s quite interesting.
If we extrapolate these effects (extrapolation is taking data and estimating what it would be like in the future, it’s very simple, you can look it up, children are taught it in high/middle school (uk/us I think)) they would be very small compared to the observed change over the past few decades. Just look at any graph and see the increase since the industrial revolution. The evidence is there, the evidence is clear, all you need to do is look into it.
You can even look at scientific papers on the subject (use google scholar, although I’d recommend only looking at the abstract and conclusion, they use a lot of technical jargon, science and maths that is difficult for non specialists to understand.
But if evidence doesn’t interest you, I ask you this. Who has more to gain from lying, Tucker, a rich right wing presenter who relies on support from his climate denying base, or scientists who are looking at evidence to try to answer a question. You seriously don’t think that if scientists found climate change wasn’t real, they wouldn’t report on it? They would.
I hope you look into it. This mindset is why we have antivaxers (the autism paper had falsified data, and was produced by a conman paid to diacredit the mmr vaccine so a company could sue them. He also released his own vaccine after releasing the paper on gut disease causing autism, caused by vaccines. Watch the hbomberguy video on antivaxers if you are one, the founder of the movement was a truly evil man who even paid children at a birthday party to draw their blood (he boasted about this and it was caught on camera)). But that aside, I hope you and others like you can look into it, it’s just the future of the world at stake.
yours is probably the smartest comment.
i see everyone, even "important" people just repeating what bil says and calling tucker names, when every respectable scientist would not call you evilz instead just go through the data WITH YOU!
instead of saying "it's settled" when every sientific paper in the world starts and ends with "it isn't. we can't reasonably predict how the climate will evolve"
Tucker is the only one shouting
bill: says something in a slow and concise manner
tucker: "WAIT WAIT WAIT, STOP STOP STOP, SLOW DOWN"
STOP STOP STOP WAIT WAIT WAIT SLOW DOWN.
SOTOP SLOW DOWN SLOW DOWN YOU ARE GOING AT THE SPEED AT LIGHT
wdym the guy is speaking 400 words per second
Comic Cub
, where is any climate denier? Name one.
Comic Cub
, name one climate denier.
Tucker: how much are humans responsible for the increasing rate?
Bill: 100%
Tucker: okay so how much?
Lmao well said.
@Mary Charge It’s the rate.
@Mary Charge 100% isn’t a rate of change.
@Mary Charge To be fair, you sound as sure as a 5 year old identifying Luxembourg in geography class. And with comparable math skills, too. Anyone who knows how to solve 1/1 wouldn’t be asking if it’s a rate or not.
Edit: maybe you’ll be better at tee ball after school. At least then your random swinging might land a hit.
@Mary Charge I didn’t think you were smart enough to see your own stupidity in stating his claim, then stating he has no claim.
Edit: I still don’t think your smart enough to see your flawed argument and thought process.
And 5 years later came Hurricane Ian.. 🤔
“You want to know when the next ice age will be…?” 😭 GOD I LOVE BILL NYE
This sounds like a skit that might've been on GTA 4 radio.
Haha i used to love listening to that station.
That’s so true haha
I sorted through tons of comments have have yet to find one as accurate as yours.
LMAO
Best comment ever!
“This is how long it takes for you to interrupt me” - amazing
he’s so petty i love it
It’s like taking us back to the T.V. show
Funny coz bill did most of the interrupting and he didn't even last a second
@@subswithoutcontentvid_at_k wym
@@subswithoutcontentvid_at_k exactly, the only difference was Tucker didn't ask Bill Nye how long it took to interrupt him, from the very beginning Nye was interrupting.
Why is a mechanical engineering talking to us on climate change??
Learn to write a proper sentence.
Quick summery,
Tucker thinks 2+2=3.
He gets cranky and throws a fit.
It’s explained to him that it’s 4, but he can’t comprehend it. He has a huge tantrum and goes to bed 👍🏽
But it is an open question for debate. To what degree does 2+2=3? Answer the question, to what degree? You are closed minded and we are out of time
I love how tucker claims “bill is shouting over the people with questions” as he is continuously shouting over bills response to them
Ikr f them republicans
And Bill says, "I love you as a person more than life itself" and Tucker goes, "before the name calling begins" I mean I know toxic masculinity is his thing, but come on
I was literally about to write this, how can you expect someone to have an open and honest debate as he kept going on about when you don't even let them talk for six seconds.
Exactly. All the while tucker is shouting and Bill never raises his voice.
@Dunxan Gilpatric....my that comment about "love you more than...." was starting the conversation with dishonesty. Tucker was getting flabbergasted because Nye couldn't answer. It's simple
If the climate we have now is what it is solely because of man, what should it have been EXACTLY, because if you don't know, there's no way to know that it has changed solely because of man.
“Ok, it only took you 6 seconds to interrupt me”
Oh my God I’m dying
Absolutely the best moment of the video. Carlson's eyebrows raise and he grins briefly at having been slammed for his disrespect. Carlson's foundation was to gaslight and be the "reasonable" one. So when he foundered, he knew it.
@@privatename2426 improv actor amongst dozens of other things, tucker carlson is an elitist who acts like he’s working and asking questions for the people lmfao
@@privatename2426 lol says the Trump supporter.
@@privatename2426 Do *you* realize that he has a degree in mechanical engineering and studied at Cornell University and the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering? Not to mention his continual involvement in so many science related educational and advocacy things that I literally couldn't list them all in this comment, how is that not enough credibility for you? Plus, it's not like all of the stuff that he is saying is only his opinion and is only based on his research; he is getting his information from, I have honestly no idea how many, but a large number of sources of research that you are more than welcome to look up for yourself as well to confirm what he is saying, but considering how little bearing you put on his education I doubt that you think they are any more credible.
@Donald Ring Seriously? It's a saying that a large majority of people use, except for some who are religious. They aren't saying that they know God, it's just a phrase.
Show me a picture of Tucker on his show where he doesn’t look confused and bewildered by absolutely anything. It can’t be done.
Facts? Where are the facts! Where are the facts! Where are the actual studies! You know paper work with actual test and what the do!
You can slowly see bill regret coming onto the show
Yeah I would too with how misinformed these people are on Fox News and those who watch it.
@You Know? It's facts
Zalaxii ...oh, I thought Bill was going to talk about multiple genders, guess he can tell me about climate change instead.
@@saltynutsman1 that's actually a misquote
Dakoda Baldur ..what’s a misquote?
Carlson "answer this question", Bill answers question, Carlson "you didn't answer my question"
No. Tucker is saying you can’t know definitively what the weather would be like if humans werent affecting the climate. While you can predict and reasonably assume what the climate would be like without human interference, you cant be definitively sure.
@@Poopopotamusgaming we actually can, because if we couldn’t we also wouldn’t have been able to figure out that ice ages happened in the extreme past
@@crimson2209 Yeah because thats something that actually happened. We cant know what would have happened if it hasnt happened.
@@Poopopotamusgaming no we didn’t actually have records of it happening, so we had to use fossil records to notice dips in populations and judging off of the patterns, it’s actually really easy to predict when it would’ve happened if there were no human intervention
Yes you can, that’s like saying if I throw a apple off a roof you can’t be 100% sure it will break, it will almost every time but there’s always a tiny tiny little chance it won’t,
Tucker looks like a kid explaining the full lore of fnaf after only playing security breach to MatPat
Partisanship before common sense.
Ideology before logic.
Woke adherence before following facts
This is embarrassing and painful to watch.
Extremely
@star cruiser oh did you do research on reliable and informational websites and study that topic for years or did you search up "Why is global warming real" and called it a day after the first website. Seems like the 2nd one to me.
star cruiser what evidence, do you mean about climate change? and if you do ask any scientist who studies it and they will give you more than enough evidence. you can also look it up, idk how that’s so hard for you to do
@star cruiser Do you know what greenhouse gases are or the ozone layer or did you not pass eighth-grade science? It must be infuriating to people who study topics for years and get people who claim they are wrong. Especially with doctors and scientists with COVID.
Yes indeed Bill Nye clearly does not know much climate history either that or he is blatantly trying to deceive.
"What would climate look like if there weren't humans?"
- "Like in 1750. (before industrial revolution) "
"WOAH WOAH SLOW DOWN THERE, you are using a language of politics!"
11 11 ok I’m here to answer all your questions, as you can see Tucker was not correctly listening, the climate would be the same as it was in 1750, there is your answer, bill gave those other examples in order to represent how some parts of the economy would also be different.
11 11 if you have any other questions, please do ask me because climate change right now is one of the worlds largest problems and if people are not on the side of fixing it starting now they are dooming the future generation.
@@MilitaryRanger7 ... In 1750, they say CO2 was at 150 ppm. That is the bottom end of plant survival and therefore life survival on earth. In 1750, life on earth faced mass extinction. Then came the industrial revolution. I am sure that 1750 is not the model year to which we should return the atmosphere.
@@MilitaryRanger7 ... If today's CO2 level is 412 ppm, and if that is way too high, then what level do you propose CO2 will be the correct level? -- considering that 150 ppm and below equals a mass extinction event... These are the legitimate and relevant questions which Bill Nye does not address. Happily, you will be able to.
Chris Thompson ofc I know the answer, 300 ppm, that the the widely known recommended amount which we should be living in AT MOST. This can be achieved by 2050 by a variety of ways if you would like me to elaborate and explain. And also the co2 was not 150 ppm during the 1750, it was around 280 ppm which is probably on of the most desirable levels for human life.
Bill: talking about grapes
Tucker: YOURE BRINGING UP POLITICS
The fact that the title is Tucker vs…. Shows that Fox News literally just wanted to put out content of division… it’s been exhausting at this point 😓 honestly
my dad watches tucker carlson daily, and he argues exactly like this. imagine how frustrating a conversation with him is
I am so sorry if you have to hear someone argue like this. If someone said “wait wait wait, slow down” to me that many times I would probably ask then if they needed me to break out the finger paints.
He probably comes at you with logic and wisdom and you're mad that you can't play victim around him
@@zparparz5620 dad destroys daughter with facts and logic headass
@@ashton803 talk like an adult or don't address me. I don't deal with ignorance.
Lmfao
bill: "hello-"
carlson: "wAIT- waitwait hOLD oN"
Crowley ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Basically every time Fox has a guest that isn't a hardcore conservative. They will invite on everyone from doctors to economists like Richard Wolff to various scientists and Bill Nye, and then talk over them the entire time. Only to at the end go "I am right but you are wrong but I keep an open mind unlike you *supposed* experts."
Nathan Jung he’s Is a scientist he has a masters degree
@H N hwo could you compare bill nye to sean hannity
You're a dickhead
“I am open minded, you are not”😂
So when nothing is done sufficiently to "save" the Earth and essentially the Earth "survives" decades, centuries later, can the fear-mongers be sentenced, judged, etc fore trying to dismantle civilization?
“I don’t know what that means” even when it was reduced to terms that children could understand, amazing
He always seems to have a confused expression on his face.
What does it mean when scientists tell us we have to contain bovine burps………when there used to be millions of buffaloe ………burping? Did killing them off save our climate? LOL, science
On behalf of Republicans and humans everywhere I'd like to apologize to Bill Nye
I think you both need to chill, equally as salty, i'd say you are just a little more ali.
pfft idc, i'd actually love for climate change to be proven wrong. Then we have nothing to worry about and we can all fight about other things like politics!
Thanks
Ryan Gonzalez You're a moron.
Well done Ryan.
And ignore the rudeness here, politeness is its own reward
:)
He answered the question. Tucker pretended not to hear it.
Bro was flabbergasted
Carlson: “you shout people down when they disagree”
Also Carlson: *Shouts and interrupts the whole time.*
Okay but Bill Nye didn’t answer the question
Glenn Widick 2003 he never let him finish lmao
@@GlennWidick yeah... pipe down.
@@GlennWidick yeah he did, you're just too stupid to understand or you're not listening.
@@venomman ohhhh really I’m to stupid to understand okay tell me why global warming has been disproven 3 times in 30 years. Tell me why the Earth is actually cooling down. Don’t you ever call me stupid I’ll put you in your place in a blink of an eye