Wouldn’t be the first time Utd have had a handout from City, but after the “not in my lifetime” and club approved banners belittling City, I don’t see that ever happening
I can't see Manchester City ever allowing united to ever share the Etihad Stadium. We did this before for 3 years after WW2 when OT was bombed and again in the 1960's in European games when OT had no floodlights. The thanks we got was the banner in the Stretford End mocking City's lack of trophies when united were at the best. Their fans forgot too quickly the helping hand we had made to the club and took great delight mocking City. Your on your own raggies 😊.
Couldn’t of put it better myself, your on your own rags rebuilding the swamp or theatre of screams as I like to call it 😂 £2bn minimum for a new stadium and not tax payers money 🥊
@@craigcombes I own a house, on which I pay ground rent. Do you seriously believe the freeholder would be able to move someone else into my house with my family. Without my agreement. Numpty.
Manchester has more united than city fans. having a fanbase that extends beyond your citu just means youre a big club. For a londoner to pick united over all of the l9ndon clubs shows how small london club's are.
As a lifelong United supporter and someone whose family have supported either United or City for over 100 years I say a resounding YES. English Football history and Manchester are intertwined. It's worked perfectly well for Inter and AC Milan. Both clubs would increase their Match-day turnover big-time whilst sharing costs 50/50. Both clubs could play @ the Etihad while a super stadium is built in the best place possible in or around Manchester. Transport links would be at the heart of the whole process allowing people easy access both in and out. United could ( if needs be) sell off the area around Old Trafford and City could do the same ( if they own it) selling off the Etihad after the new stadium is finished. Starting afresh there would be ample room for a City Trophy Room and a United Trophy room. Within the seating @ both ends of the ground you could have a safe standing area for 20,000. Thus you would have 40,000 young and hopefully local fans singing their hearts out. This would mean that the stadium would not have to be built too high or far away from the pitch whilst still having a capacity of 100,000. Everyone would be a winner! ps. We defo don't want anything that's like the New Wembley, The Emirates or the Nou Camp. All terrible stadiums for atmosphere 👍
You fail to miss that London has dozens of top flight clubs yet they still couldn't attract their locals to support them. Says more about lindon clubd tbh, and united are still the big club in Manchester as far as supporters.
"Our Etihad". Lol. It's owned by Etihad not you. The clue is in the name. And the vast majority of construction was paid for by Sport England, not Man City.
Lol yeah right. United need more seats. Waiting list for our season tickets is a long wait. We could have a 100k stadium and fill it every week. And we're on 76k now.
If City were to share the stadium with MU, we’d first have to perform some renovations to make the MU fans feel at home - make sure the roof leaks, clog the toilets so there’d be piss everywhere and of course, a MU fav, make sure there were plenty of rats on game day so they’d feel right at home. On the other hand, maybe it would be better if the Rags stayed in their swamp instead
To make city feel at home utd would have to only half fill there sugar daddies club and give free tickets away every week .. 115 reasons why utd will distance themselves from the abu dhabi fc
@@barbarohelm9697 The seething jealousy and hope for our down in your comment just warms the cockles of my heart :) Keep living in the past, it is all you got!
@barbarohelm9697 didn't you lot beg for Saudi owners on nothing more than what you saw them do for City. Your fake morals were disregarded the moment you could take something City have. Don't get it confused nothing about City is modeled after United and City are proud of that. Pack ure stadium for ure midtable clashes and watch a small club do big things
@@MCFCTheMadHatter We've won 10x more than your club has in it's history without sports washing. lol Your club is irrelevant. Your claim to fame is been in the same city as United. United don't even respect you enough to say you are main rivals. It's Liverpool not City.
City have nothing to do with this. It's you lot that's using their name. City not desperate or broke. Could build a new stadium by themselves if they wanted, you can't be humble and go play in the parking lot for europa league spot.
City have allowed United to play at at their stadium before, when Old Trafford was bombed during WW2. United used Maine Road for either no rent or very little. Maine Road was bigger than Old Trafford , allowing them bigger attendances and greater gate reciepts. The move was only of benefit to United with them taking many of City fans back with them when they moved back to Old Trafford. If you look at the history of attendances, City was always greater until you will see a swing in favour of United during and after that period. Let the biggest club in the world sort their own stadium. City shouldn't do them any favours this time around.
You can't be serious did you not listen when the cost was mentioned and the site of current stadium. It makes more sense to spend 2 billion to have new ground with lots of other perks over spending close to 1.5 billion polishing a turd. Liverpool case is different and even that ended up costing double the original quoted price.
It’s about where the stadium is - we have the rail tracks on one side and a canal on the other side, plus the infrastructure is very old. The sheer cost of a renovation, which still might not leave you with a world class stadium, means that a new stadium might be the best option. I’ve been going to OT for 51 years, and my feeling is that a rebuild is the way to go…as long as it’s built along side the existing stadium, and the don’t mess with the name, I can handle that.
Have you been to Anfield? After 45 minutes there you can barely stand up. It's so crampt. A pal whos followed Liverpool all his life couldn't get up as he'd had a knee replacement which had seized up during the game!
it didn't cost double at all, just the Anfield stadium itself as an example cost around 80 million, which the original price was planed for 60 but pandemics made it more.
@@koko-nv5ru But even after the work that's been done, Anfield is a dump. They have been left miles behind by City, United and even Everton now who will have the best stadium in Liverpool soon! All Liverpool have done is bought a few more years before their stadium crumbles. They haven't got the money to build a new stadium and they couldn't fill it unless they continue to have success as the bare bones are, they are a small town club!
Best thing the Government/Manchester Mayor could do would be to improve public transport infrastructure to Old Trafford site. If they ever got HS3 off the ground, they could have a stop under the stadium area as a further rapid link to Central Manchester. The current provision of trains plus trams isn't up to scratch in terms of capacity. Spurs have about 12-15 trains an hour going both south and north on two separate lines, plus the Victoria line underground runs every 2 minutes in both directions and that stadium is only 62,000. The club also puts on free bus shuttles from mainline stations. One tram and one train line isn't going to do it for 90,000 people in Manchester.
There's nothing wrong with the Old Trafford stadium that a bit if TLC won't cure. All it needs is the Upgrade of the Sir Bobby Charlton Stand & East & West quadrant to complete the original design & a Levelled Retractable New Roof + modern refurbishment of the rest of the stadium to warrant at least 90K capacity Take Note: The stadium expansion MUST NOT exceed the rail track! Please Share!
The Owners were the ones who stop the Original project by using the excuse of the rail track complications. As stated previously, the design has already been laid out for completion of the stadium by original designers, to finish before the train track but the owners compromised by installed the 3rd tier cos the fans were complaining about the capacity at that time. Alls well we like to think that once the owners depart or bring in SJR and his team we can address the layout for the necessary expansion of the South stand, East & West quadrant issue ASAP because Wembley or Man City's Etihad is to far to deal with the fan base, we're sure that can be achieved with minimal fuss, going by our walk around the stadium experience by observation. Take Note: The Stadium Expansion should Not Exceed the rail track. We feel in 18 month to 2 years copying Real Madrid project with the right people it can be achieved in line with progress on the pitch! Worth a view, please share!
the bitterness in these comment towards little old City is unbelivable. United and their fans are pretty embarassing at this point. Looking for handouts from the governments, desperately wanting City to help with a ground...the biggest club in the world should be able to handle this on their own.
City took a monumentally massive handout from government when they moved into their current stadium for next to nothing. Clearly not the City "fan" you proclaim to be if you didn't know that. Lol
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot and your proof is where.... remember land for building is worth more than any stadium.... City have constantly given to the community and United give little to nothing... and now want hand outs.... what a pathetic club on and off the pitch!
Desperately using City's name for clout. I thought it was a discussion, turns out nothing they do makes sense anymore unless there is some links to City.
@jhpfdijtuiweruot City of Manchester stadium was built to host an international tournament. Not specifically for manchester city f.c.... should it have been abandoned after the tournament. Manchester council converted it from an athletic to football stadium not help build one for Manchester City Fc. It's leased not owned by Manchester City. Old trafford is owned by united. Stupid
At present The Old Trafford Stadium is still incomplete & needs is an upgrade of the SBC stand & East & West quadrant to be completed first before you can sort out the roof. This Stadium has a lot of potential & can be one of the best stadium in Europe if not the world with the original design cos it has character & authentic with the potential capacity of at least 90K, all it needs is an refurbished & some TLC. Take Note: The Stadium Must Not Exceed the rail way track! Man Utd 's Old Trafford 'The Super Bowl of Stadiums known as 'The Theatre of Dreams' is unique & a Colossal of a stadium.
I mean, this just comes across as incredibly bitter. Stadiums were built for events and given to the teams as something had to be done with them. this ain't the same thing. Also, I think the billions the Shiekh has put back into Manchester has made up for any of the taxes you lost. Get a grip, honey. Smile once in a while.
@@yellowtgn Bitter? It's simply an undeniable fact that he shared. Hilarious that you think it was only taxpayers in East London and Manchester who had to cough up for the stadiums, though
Do you lot realize Manchester City doesn't not own the ETIHAD stadium. It'd actually the City of Manchester stadium. ITS LITERALLY STILL OWNED BY THE MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL. Manchester City Fc pays a lease. Old trafford is owned by united. Lack of knowledge killing the rivals
Why would United want to share a stadium with 115charges fc!? They’ll be hosting league2 games in the near future, why would they want to share with that? 🤣😂🤣
Were City the ones to bring this ridiculous idea or even apart of it. Stop using City to be relevant. It's shitnited that came up with this. City don't need united for anything.
Sharing! you having a laugh? Man Utd's new proposed stadium will need to be at least 90,000 capacity, and probably more. Man City could only dream of having that kind of support, they don't have Man Utd's history and trophies either! :)
Biggest richest club in the world cant afford to build a new ground copy Tottenham and build it yourselves what a joke. City arent gonna share with United at all
@@topoftheleague8814 😂😂😂 sorry you think we want to be in the empty had? You lot are delusional after all 😂 115 charges looking enjoy national league 👌🏻
Its not just the obvious stuff thats out of date the actual basics are like electric cables, plumbing system and the rest of it. There is a point where renovating something even if possible is the wrong choice. If the Glazers had kept up with maintenace and development for the past 20 years, especially the past 10 maybe you could renovate but at this point it might be past saving. I wouldnt want that to be the case but it might be.
We want an Expansion to approx 90K capacity, Modern refurbishment & a Levelled Retractable New Roof! There's an completed stadium design on WHF!🔰@UtdWesleyy with a comment stating: So apparently we are looking at an expansion of Old Trafford. It’s been talked about for years but put off because of the complications around the south section of the stadium but if we do manage to do it…🔴 2 Tier SBC Capacity: 88,000+ We're sure that can be achieved with minimal fuss by observation cos its already laid out going by our walk around the stadium experience. Take Note: The Stadium Expansion Must Not Exceed the rail way track! Worth a view, please share!
Build a new stadium, a super modern stadium with things brought over from the old one, build it next door 100 yards away...i'd like a 68,000 seater in honor of the 68 team that won the first European Cup, and a special Munch stand with 23,000 seats in honor of the 23 that tragically passed away
Either way, they will still need to refurbish Old Trafford ASAP because its going to be a couple of years till any bricks are laid or a final decision is made whether to build next door or rebuild the existing ground. Fix the leaks and a lick of paint with some new plastic toilet seats and air fresheners for the bogs should tide the fans over for another 5 years..
government funded? Come on guys the government dont pay for a single thing, We the tax payers do! Why should all other football fans and people who dont like or watch football pay for Man U's stadium???? Im leaving the country if this happens!
So the two richest clubs in the country ie Manchester Utd muting a handout from taxpayer whilst Man City got their stadium of the taxpayer are taking the piss, pay for your own stadium.
Never in my lifetime,will man utd be sharing anything with Manchester City.When City move from their old stadium they didn't share with man utd... So wtf😅
When Old Trafford got bombed in WW2 where do you think they played? Looking through these comments United ‘fans’ didn’t even know that. How embarrassing.
Tbh city don’t own the ground they’re just lease holders The council can change their lease agreement if they wish But no would rather united play in the car park for a few seasons then play at the dump
This guy jamie jackson has no idea what hes talking about, he csnt even finish most of his statements without just stopping his train of thought and saying "but yeah you know"
You know someone can't be taken seriously when says option is a new stadium and old stadium becomes a museum or, wait for it, a women's stadium, ludicrous. And how El Cheapo MU has become, skint and looking for a government handout. The 3 Sirs should concentrate on better players and better pies.
Man City didn't ask for this. It has nothing to do with them. United are just using Citys name. City can build a new stadium if they want. Plans are already approved to upgrade the Etihad. Shitnited has a problem with their stadium not City
People are blowing this whole government funding thing up and being quite silly about it. The government is never going to pay for a new stadium, and I’m pretty sure Sir Jim never said that either. To get some kind of initial funding is different and it would be a tiny bit of the overall cost…..one way or another if this happens then it will have to be paid for by the club.
Why do people not know that Etihad stadium is not owned by Manchester City its leased. It's literally owned by the Manchester City Council. It's called the City of Manchester Stadium, Etihad stadium is the sponsored name. Old Trafford is owned by United.
They weren't given a stadium. They leased one that was there after a major tournament and the city was deciding what to do with it, so they leased it to the local team. That's helping them build a stadium.
@@garywallace5602 it definitely is partly down to their roots, the Busby babies was a massive inspiration to many around the world and they went on to win in Europe which instantly draws more people in.
@@Cymru85 Agreed, the Busby babes was certainly an influence. However, how many United fans nowadays even remember them? Not many. Most of them support them due to the Fergie years...winning everything in sight for 2 decades of dominance!
Why should tax payers have to pick up the tab for United, the biggest club in the world? Tottenham borrowed the money to build their new stadium they didn't get tax payers to pay for it.
10 seconds into jamie jackson talking i literally thought it was gary Neville 🤣
😂😂
if it happens it will be the first time city have a full stadium
Should ManUtd Apologize to the People of Manchester for trying to destroy the ManCity Eastlands project ...
Wouldn’t be the first time Utd have had a handout from City, but after the “not in my lifetime” and club approved banners belittling City, I don’t see that ever happening
Er, City famously got a huge handout from Sport England when they moved into the Commonwealth stadium for next to nothing. Weird "argument"
They're all the same
says the bitter blue
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot Brush up on your history and you’ll understand the comment more
@@jhpfdijtuiweruotI don't think it was billions tho😂
I can't see Manchester City ever allowing united to ever share the Etihad Stadium.
We did this before for 3 years after WW2 when OT was bombed and again in the 1960's in European games when OT had no floodlights. The thanks we got was the banner in the Stretford End mocking City's lack of trophies when united were at the best. Their fans forgot too quickly the helping hand we had made to the club and took great delight mocking City.
Your on your own raggies 😊.
Couldn’t of put it better myself, your on your own rags rebuilding the swamp or theatre of screams as I like to call it 😂 £2bn minimum for a new stadium and not tax payers money 🥊
City wouldn't have a say. You don't own the ground Manchester city Council do. Pillock
@@craigcombes I own a house, on which I pay ground rent. Do you seriously believe the freeholder would be able to move someone else into my house with my family. Without my agreement.
Numpty.
@@Geokinkladze comparing a stadium to a house. Ape lmao what made you think that was a good come back 😂😂😂
@@craigcombes "I don't understand what freehold means"
Yeah I know.
Why don't they play at Wembley? It would only be a short journey for their fans.
as a united fan this is quiet funny, however not our fault we have support all over the world.
Manchester has more united than city fans.
having a fanbase that extends beyond your citu just means youre a big club.
For a londoner to pick united over all of the l9ndon clubs shows how small london club's are.
Another Man u Fan here that can appreciate the humour.
Are you sure about that. In Manchester itself. @@Cymru85
You support where your from end on! Sick of these plastic fans
As a lifelong United supporter and someone whose family have supported either United or City for over 100 years I say a resounding YES. English Football history and Manchester are intertwined. It's worked perfectly well for Inter and AC Milan. Both clubs would increase their Match-day turnover big-time whilst sharing costs 50/50.
Both clubs could play @ the Etihad while a super stadium is built in the best place possible in or around Manchester. Transport links would be at the heart of the whole process allowing people easy access both in and out. United could ( if needs be) sell off the area around Old Trafford and City could do the same ( if they own it) selling off the Etihad after the new stadium is finished.
Starting afresh there would be ample room for a City Trophy Room and a United Trophy room. Within the seating @ both ends of the ground you could have a safe standing area for 20,000. Thus you would have 40,000 young and hopefully local fans singing their hearts out. This would mean that the stadium would not have to be built too high or far away from the pitch whilst still having a capacity of 100,000.
Everyone would be a winner!
ps. We defo don't want anything that's like the New Wembley, The Emirates or the Nou Camp. All terrible stadiums for atmosphere 👍
They can play their matches in wembley stadium, that is where Utd fans live anyway
About 20 years to late with that pun kid. Try again. Move on now.
You fail to miss that London has dozens of top flight clubs yet they still couldn't attract their locals to support them.
Says more about lindon clubd tbh, and united are still the big club in Manchester as far as supporters.
@@Cymru85 Fact
@@Cymru85 If westham were winning the trophies Utd won for the past 50 years, Utd would be Villa and Westham Utd of today..Use your brain next time
@@GermanChickenwingAre you looking foward to playing in league two soon pal😎
Sorry, we don't want our Etihad to be subjected to leaky roof because of a certain fanbase 💙🦈
@@kevinconway2965 🤡
"Our Etihad". Lol. It's owned by Etihad not you. The clue is in the name. And the vast majority of construction was paid for by Sport England, not Man City.
No not emptyhad wouldn't want to be associated with ManCheaty 115+ especially as they will be playing in the conference league
@@jonathankennedy1715Keep crying
Lol yeah right. United need more seats. Waiting list for our season tickets is a long wait. We could have a 100k stadium and fill it every week. And we're on 76k now.
It'd be the first time City would fill their stadium. 😂
The arrogance.
😂😂😂
@@anshumansahu1087 more like facts
If City were to share the stadium with MU, we’d first have to perform some renovations to make the MU fans feel at home - make sure the roof leaks, clog the toilets so there’d be piss everywhere and of course, a MU fav, make sure there were plenty of rats on game day so they’d feel right at home.
On the other hand, maybe it would be better if the Rags stayed in their swamp instead
To make city feel at home utd would have to only half fill there sugar daddies club and give free tickets away every week .. 115 reasons why utd will distance themselves from the abu dhabi fc
@@barbarohelm9697 The seething jealousy and hope for our down in your comment just warms the cockles of my heart :)
Keep living in the past, it is all you got!
@barbarohelm9697 didn't you lot beg for Saudi owners on nothing more than what you saw them do for City. Your fake morals were disregarded the moment you could take something City have. Don't get it confused nothing about City is modeled after United and City are proud of that. Pack ure stadium for ure midtable clashes and watch a small club do big things
@@MCFCTheMadHatter We've won 10x more than your club has in it's history without sports washing. lol Your club is irrelevant. Your claim to fame is been in the same city as United. United don't even respect you enough to say you are main rivals. It's Liverpool not City.
No way id rather united play on the car park outside old Trafford than share with city
Good idea,make it easier for when your garbage team park the bus.
City have nothing to do with this. It's you lot that's using their name. City not desperate or broke. Could build a new stadium by themselves if they wanted, you can't be humble and go play in the parking lot for europa league spot.
City have allowed United to play at at their stadium before, when Old Trafford was bombed during WW2. United used Maine Road for either no rent or very little. Maine Road was bigger than Old Trafford , allowing them bigger attendances and greater gate reciepts. The move was only of benefit to United with them taking many of City fans back with them when they moved back to Old Trafford. If you look at the history of attendances, City was always greater until you will see a swing in favour of United during and after that period. Let the biggest club in the world sort their own stadium. City shouldn't do them any favours this time around.
fake facts right there
@@jimee5945 whatever you say cockney united glory fan.
City had the BIGGEST crowd for a game outside of Wembley ..... bigger than any crowd United have had.
@@barryh.4220 that's true. Also, I United's highest ever attendance was set at Maine Road too!
Why can’t they renovate and expand Old Trafford similar to how it was done at Anfield? Old Trafford is too iconic to leave behind
You can't be serious did you not listen when the cost was mentioned and the site of current stadium.
It makes more sense to spend 2 billion to have new ground with lots of other perks over spending close to 1.5 billion polishing a turd.
Liverpool case is different and even that ended up costing double the original quoted price.
It’s about where the stadium is - we have the rail tracks on one side and a canal on the other side, plus the infrastructure is very old. The sheer cost of a renovation, which still might not leave you with a world class stadium, means that a new stadium might be the best option. I’ve been going to OT for 51 years, and my feeling is that a rebuild is the way to go…as long as it’s built along side the existing stadium, and the don’t mess with the name, I can handle that.
Have you been to Anfield? After 45 minutes there you can barely stand up. It's so crampt. A pal whos followed Liverpool all his life couldn't get up as he'd had a knee replacement which had seized up during the game!
it didn't cost double at all, just the Anfield stadium itself as an example cost around 80 million, which the original price was planed for 60 but pandemics made it more.
@@koko-nv5ru But even after the work that's been done, Anfield is a dump. They have been left miles behind by City, United and even Everton now who will have the best stadium in Liverpool soon! All Liverpool have done is bought a few more years before their stadium crumbles. They haven't got the money to build a new stadium and they couldn't fill it unless they continue to have success as the bare bones are, they are a small town club!
No thanks!! Would rather play our matches at Gigg Lane!!
Best thing the Government/Manchester Mayor could do would be to improve public transport infrastructure to Old Trafford site. If they ever got HS3 off the ground, they could have a stop under the stadium area as a further rapid link to Central Manchester. The current provision of trains plus trams isn't up to scratch in terms of capacity. Spurs have about 12-15 trains an hour going both south and north on two separate lines, plus the Victoria line underground runs every 2 minutes in both directions and that stadium is only 62,000. The club also puts on free bus shuttles from mainline stations. One tram and one train line isn't going to do it for 90,000 people in Manchester.
There's nothing wrong with the Old Trafford stadium that a bit if TLC won't cure. All it needs is the Upgrade of the Sir Bobby Charlton Stand & East & West quadrant to complete the original design & a Levelled Retractable New Roof + modern refurbishment of the rest of the stadium to warrant at least 90K capacity
Take Note: The stadium expansion MUST NOT exceed the rail track!
Please Share!
The Owners were the ones who stop the Original project by using the excuse of the rail track complications. As stated previously, the design has already been laid out for completion of the stadium by original designers, to finish before the train track but the owners compromised by installed the 3rd tier cos the fans were complaining about the capacity at that time.
Alls well we like to think that once the owners depart or bring in SJR and his team we can address the layout for the necessary expansion of the South stand, East & West quadrant issue ASAP because Wembley or Man City's Etihad is to far to deal with the fan base, we're sure that can be achieved with minimal fuss, going by our walk around the stadium experience by observation.
Take Note: The Stadium Expansion should Not Exceed the rail track.
We feel in 18 month to 2 years copying Real Madrid project with the right people it can be achieved in line with progress on the pitch!
Worth a view, please share!
the bitterness in these comment towards little old City is unbelivable. United and their fans are pretty embarassing at this point. Looking for handouts from the governments, desperately wanting City to help with a ground...the biggest club in the world should be able to handle this on their own.
City took a monumentally massive handout from government when they moved into their current stadium for next to nothing. Clearly not the City "fan" you proclaim to be if you didn't know that. Lol
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot and your proof is where.... remember land for building is worth more than any stadium.... City have constantly given to the community and United give little to nothing... and now want hand outs.... what a pathetic club on and off the pitch!
A 2008 fan clearly
Desperately using City's name for clout. I thought it was a discussion, turns out nothing they do makes sense anymore unless there is some links to City.
@jhpfdijtuiweruot City of Manchester stadium was built to host an international tournament. Not specifically for manchester city f.c.... should it have been abandoned after the tournament. Manchester council converted it from an athletic to football stadium not help build one for Manchester City Fc. It's leased not owned by Manchester City. Old trafford is owned by united. Stupid
At present The Old Trafford Stadium is still incomplete & needs is an upgrade of the SBC stand & East & West quadrant to be completed first before you can sort out the roof.
This Stadium has a lot of potential & can be one of the best stadium in Europe if not the world with the original design cos it has character & authentic with the potential capacity of at least 90K, all it needs is an refurbished & some TLC.
Take Note: The Stadium Must Not Exceed the rail way track!
Man Utd 's Old Trafford 'The Super Bowl of Stadiums known as 'The Theatre of Dreams' is unique & a Colossal of a stadium.
City and West Ham received stadiums for nothing.
Why?
I mean, this just comes across as incredibly bitter. Stadiums were built for events and given to the teams as something had to be done with them. this ain't the same thing. Also, I think the billions the Shiekh has put back into Manchester has made up for any of the taxes you lost. Get a grip, honey. Smile once in a while.
So City paying 5m every year is nothing? Dont be stupid
@@yellowtgn Bitter? It's simply an undeniable fact that he shared. Hilarious that you think it was only taxpayers in East London and Manchester who had to cough up for the stadiums, though
Do you lot realize Manchester City doesn't not own the ETIHAD stadium. It'd actually the City of Manchester stadium. ITS LITERALLY STILL OWNED BY THE MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL. Manchester City Fc pays a lease. Old trafford is owned by united. Lack of knowledge killing the rivals
Why would United want to share a stadium with 115charges fc!? They’ll be hosting league2 games in the near future, why would they want to share with that? 🤣😂🤣
Were City the ones to bring this ridiculous idea or even apart of it. Stop using City to be relevant. It's shitnited that came up with this. City don't need united for anything.
Keep crying
@@Kaisar9000 truth hurts!? Keep cryin pal!! 🤣😂🤣
@@me4374 Truth will hurt on you though when city being found out not guilty again, you seem didn't learn anything after CAS lol
@@Kaisar9000 wow you sound rattled!! Scared much!! 🤣😂🤣
It's not even city's ground - us taxpayers own it!
Sharing! you having a laugh? Man Utd's new proposed stadium will need to be at least 90,000 capacity, and probably more. Man City could only dream of having that kind of support, they don't have Man Utd's history and trophies either! :)
I would really love if city give their under 21 training academy ground . Life long banter material there
Biggest richest club in the world cant afford to build a new ground copy Tottenham and build it yourselves what a joke. City arent gonna share with United at all
absolutely not utd can just play over there on that bit of grass over there we are not sharing our stadium with u lot
If utd wants a 2 billon stadium then the glazers best take a pay cut 😂😂😂
What happens if City have a champioship game on the same day as United have a PL game?
probably the same as when city play for the title on the last day and united play to avoid relegation
oh so now the own it..... you must be a united fan with that arrogance.... use Wembley... its nearer your fanbase!
What are you talking about? We’ll be having sellout games in League 2 so MU will just have to build their schedule around ours.😊
More debt for Utd..I am loving this as a City fan
You'll be paying towards it you upstart 😂
@@mister3566 What?
CIty and Chelsea are plastic clubs.... Just oil money
@GermanChickenwing Government will be chipping in towards it which means your tax will help. Haha
@@mister3566 Because i told you i live in manchester?
Would be only time its sold out
argh the copium.... keep dreaming and keep confirming..... why we want you nowhere near the Etihad!
@@topoftheleague8814 😂😂😂 sorry you think we want to be in the empty had? You lot are delusional after all 😂 115 charges looking enjoy national league 👌🏻
@@MALL5And you will be crying when City being found out not guilty.
@@Kaisar9000 I’ll save this for when you’re relegated 😂
There on bout building stadium next to stadium , best knocking it down an rebuild
Its not just the obvious stuff thats out of date the actual basics are like electric cables, plumbing system and the rest of it. There is a point where renovating something even if possible is the wrong choice. If the Glazers had kept up with maintenace and development for the past 20 years, especially the past 10 maybe you could renovate but at this point it might be past saving. I wouldnt want that to be the case but it might be.
They did share stadium back in the day wen world war was going on
Not a chance. The Emptyhad isn't big enough and they may ask for half the rent too! I rather play at Bolton than the Council ground.
There's only a handful of stadiums with 55k and more in england? Bolton is even smaller. What's the point in saying then say Bolton. Haha
KNOW I CAN EASILY SAY MANCHESTER IS BLUE 😂😂😂😂😂💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
Forget it the best club City is having their new expansion ready in 2026 ....they won't need yooonited stadium..
We want an Expansion to approx 90K capacity, Modern refurbishment & a Levelled Retractable New Roof!
There's an completed stadium design on WHF!🔰@UtdWesleyy with a comment stating: So apparently we are looking at an expansion of Old Trafford. It’s been talked about for years
but put off because of the complications around the south section of the stadium but if we do manage to do it…🔴 2 Tier SBC Capacity: 88,000+
We're sure that can be achieved with minimal fuss by observation cos its already laid out going by our walk around the stadium experience.
Take Note: The Stadium Expansion Must Not Exceed the rail way track!
Worth a view, please share!
Build a new stadium, a super modern stadium with things brought over from the old one, build it next door 100 yards away...i'd like a 68,000 seater in honor of the 68 team that won the first European Cup, and a special Munch stand with 23,000 seats in honor of the 23 that tragically passed away
Either way, they will still need to refurbish Old Trafford ASAP because its going to be a couple of years till any bricks are laid or a final decision is made whether to build next door or rebuild the existing ground. Fix the leaks and a lick of paint with some new plastic toilet seats and air fresheners for the bogs should tide the fans over for another 5 years..
we aint refurbishing OT. We getting a new stadium but it's still gonna be in the area (Old Trafford)
We’d show city fans how to fill the etihad
Why put city in there. They cant even sell 20 thousand. There are very few city fans even in manchester
And yet have on of the highest attendance records. Don’t come online and spew ignorance please, have some sense
I'm a Manc Red and that's just nonsense.
@@libby4608highest attendance records 😆 how the f do you work that out
@@richardjones8699 City fans aren't gonna suck you off mate.
@@3StripesBenz one of the highest. Look it up
government funded? Come on guys the government dont pay for a single thing, We the tax payers do! Why should all other football fans and people who dont like or watch football pay for Man U's stadium???? Im leaving the country if this happens!
Liverpool fans, are all up for the idea, I read in "The Sunday Sport".
It already happened. Who do you think paid for City's stadium? Bye bye then. WHere are you moving to?
So the two richest clubs in the country ie Manchester Utd muting a handout from taxpayer whilst Man City got their stadium of the taxpayer are taking the piss, pay for your own stadium.
As long as any new stadium they build is christened "New Trafford", I don't really care for it. 😅
No not emptyhad wouldn't want to be associated with ManCheaty 115+ especially as they will be playing in the conference league
Never in my lifetime,will man utd be sharing anything with Manchester City.When City move from their old stadium they didn't share with man utd... So wtf😅
You're gullible mate.
absolute scam, they should pay like Arsenal had to.
When Old Trafford got bombed in WW2 where do you think they played?
Looking through these comments United ‘fans’ didn’t even know that. How embarrassing.
Its a crush for fans at OT with poor poor facilites…NEW STADIUM 😉👍🏻
Tbh city don’t own the ground they’re just lease holders
The council can change their lease agreement if they wish
But no would rather united play in the car park for a few seasons then play at the dump
Makes sense
Rival fans taxes paying for it? NO WAY
Where do you think the money for City's Etihad stadium came from? Clue: the taxpayer
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot lol that was built for the commonwealth games and then they paid for it 20 years ago
Down size it to the women's stadium 😂🤦♂️ brilliant 😂
This guy jamie jackson has no idea what hes talking about, he csnt even finish most of his statements without just stopping his train of thought and saying "but yeah you know"
How can you deduct points from Everton for spending money on a new stadium them gift Man United a TAX payer funded stadium?
Manchester United is the biggest tourist site in Manchester. They bring in money too.
We don't want them. Let the 1990s fanboys rot in their smug complacency
keep it as a museum !!!! its a museum now living in fantasy land
Manchester City bailed the rags out for decades I dont think they will do it now.
They would not need 2 as they would build the new saduim next to old trattford on the car .while still playing in the new staudim
While still playing in the old staudim i ment
its a shareholders club, they pay ffs
Moves to a tax haven then asks the government to build a new old Trafford 😂 oh united what have you gotten yourself into.
You know someone can't be taken seriously when says option is a new stadium and old stadium becomes a museum or, wait for it, a women's stadium, ludicrous. And how El Cheapo MU has become, skint and looking for a government handout. The 3 Sirs should concentrate on better players and better pies.
Can’t see this at all particularly getting public money when both Man U and Man C are rich clubs!
Man City didn't ask for this. It has nothing to do with them. United are just using Citys name. City can build a new stadium if they want. Plans are already approved to upgrade the Etihad. Shitnited has a problem with their stadium not City
People are blowing this whole government funding thing up and being quite silly about it. The government is never going to pay for a new stadium, and I’m pretty sure Sir Jim never said that either. To get some kind of initial funding is different and it would be a tiny bit of the overall cost…..one way or another if this happens then it will have to be paid for by the club.
And yet the government paid for the vast majority of City's current stadium.
The amount of tax these clubs/players pay makes it a good investment.
Neither is sir Jim, he’s already spent a fortune to buy a Ferrari and ends up with a broken down fiesta 😂
Why do people not know that Etihad stadium is not owned by Manchester City its leased. It's literally owned by the Manchester City Council. It's called the City of Manchester Stadium, Etihad stadium is the sponsored name. Old Trafford is owned by United.
They weren't given a stadium. They leased one that was there after a major tournament and the city was deciding what to do with it, so they leased it to the local team. That's helping them build a stadium.
No way should the leveling up funding be used.
No way in a million years should utd be allowed anywhere our Etihad
It’s not even city ground 😂😂😂😂😂 they rent it
These guys don’t understand business and scale of what SJR trying to do!
Apparently, Lego have the contract to build the stadium. It'll be called "The Legoland Stadium". Built in plastic...for the plastics!
they city ground should build a jobcentre next door for all their supporters.
How are united fans plastics?
They earned the right to be a big club without being funded(illegally) by oil money.
@@Cymru85 Why do you think they have one of the biggest fan bases in the world? It's certainly not down to their Mancunian roots!
@@garywallace5602 it definitely is partly down to their roots, the Busby babies was a massive inspiration to many around the world and they went on to win in Europe which instantly draws more people in.
@@Cymru85 Agreed, the Busby babes was certainly an influence. However, how many United fans nowadays even remember them? Not many. Most of them support them due to the Fergie years...winning everything in sight for 2 decades of dominance!
Why should tax payers have to pick up the tab for United, the biggest club in the world? Tottenham borrowed the money to build their new stadium they didn't get tax payers to pay for it.
It would just be united fans tho
Well obv if city played there it would be 90 percent empty
3 years max to build it, anymore is not worth it. Spurs fan.
Build a team first Radcliffe
We're not going to be sharing a stadium with them 😂 you guys just like to talk rubbish.
OLD TRAFFORD'S FALLIN' DOWN😙
No way
Can't see any City fan, or the club entertaining that .... Trafford Park will always be a right shithole.
Etihad took 3yrs to build at less than 200million.. where they pulling these numbers and time lengths from?
Yeah but look at state of it and where it is
Small clubs with small stadiums can get away with it
The club will not receive any money from the Government - levelling up doesn't including propping up billionaires
I'd stop watching football. End of
The championship fixtures would clash with united fixtures though ? 😅
It’s gonna be the best stadium in the EFL 😂😂😂
A 90k stadium thats up to date is obviously going to be the best.