...astounding. If these alignments were all intentional, then this culture had a genius and connection with nature that we have not even begun to replicate.
Pointing out a possible mistake people make in reading (following) Plato's description of Atlantis: Note at roughly the midpoint of the Critias, Plato describes the citadel of Atlantis as being surrounded by concentric circles of water and earth. The outermost circle of water being 27 stadia from the inner island had a connecting canal that lead to another 50 stadia allowing passage to the sea. Plato's dialogue can be confused to make people think the 27 stadia is inside the 50 stadia distance for the canal, which it is not. Quote: "And beginning from the sea they bored a canal of three hundred feet in width and one hundred feet in depth and fifty stadia in length, which they carried through to the outermost zone, making a passage from the sea up to this, which became a harbor, and leaving an opening sufficient to enable the largest vessels to find ingress." Take note he starts this passage with "And beginning from the sea..." meaning our direction from here is inward leading toward the city. He continues to describe the canal which was built being "50 stadia in length, which they carried through to the outermost zone, making a passage from the sea up to this". "Up to this" is the outermost concentric circle of water, where he continues and states "Which became a harbor". He describes the outermost concentric circle of water as an 'inner' harbor. By this description alone, the outermost circle of water was a harbor. This outermost circle to the center of the island was a radial distance of 27 stadia. From this point, he states "...up to this" being the harbor there is 'another' 50 stadia distance of canal leading the sea. To maintain the diameter of a concentric circle, the 50 stadia radius from the sea to the citadel's outermost ring is doubled for 100 stadia, plus the diameter of 27 stadia for the ringed zones of the citadel, that is 127 stadia total. Plato's dialogue describing the concentric circles surrounding Atlantis: Quote: "...the largest of the zones into which a passage was cut from the sea was 3 stadia in breadth and the zone of land which came next of equal breadth; but the next two zones the one of water, the other of land, were 2 stadia, and the one which surrounded the central island was 1 stadium only in width. The island on which the palace was situated had a diameter of 5 stadia. All this including the zones and the bridge, which was the sixth part of a stadium in width, they surrounded by a stone wall on every side, placing towers and gates on the bridges where the sea passed in." Breakdown of zones of water and land: Zone of water 3 stadia in breadth = 555m (outermost circle) Zone of land 3 stadia in breadth = 555m Zone of water 2 stadia in breadth = 370m Zone of land 2 stadia in breadth = 370m Zone of water 1 stadia in breadth = 185m (circle around the citadel's inner island) This is a radius of 11 stadia in total being 1,665km, which has the diameter of 22 stadia being 4,070km Add the diameter of the center island of 5 stadia (925m) equals 27 stadia in total diameter being 4,995km Add the outermost circle surrounding the entire city which is a radial distance 50 stadia for the canal leading from the sea to the inner harbor which is doubled for diameter equals 127 stadia being 23,495km for the entire city capital of Atlantis. * 185 meters equal 1 stade multiplied by 127 stadia for a total diameter of 23,495 kilometers for the entire capital city of Atlantis. So, if 1 stadia equals 185m, then 127 stadia equals 23.495km for the overall diameter of Atlantis The Richat Structure equals 23.5km, that's pretty damn close!
Clear and thorough presentation. Happy to accept your identification of the location of Atlantis but I remain to be convinced of all these geographical and geometric correlations. Your work however is thought provoking and may (some day) sway my skepticism. Keep'em coming.
You should write a book putting all this together; it’d help to see the calculations and measurements on paper and to explain the relationships between the sites.
Ive stared at that crater, but assumed it to old... and for its purposed age to be so young, and yet nearly filled, makes it sound as though the crater experienced the same muddy flood as the fabled city!
This series of vids are some of the best, perhaps the best that I’ve seen over the past decade I hope Jimmy sees them and shows Joe Rogan and your message gets out there. You may very well be on to something here. I love the work of Howard Crowhurst and Randall. I hope these guys see all this info too. Too work sir
briliant video. but whats at the right angle south of Spain, pillars of Hercules was to the right of this, perhaps one of the islands close to the pillars of hercules that sunk that Randal Carlson spoke about, speaking of which, i love Randalls series on Atlantis and why it was the Azores, have you seen it?
Just as I said in a comment on another of your videos, Plato's writings describe the Atlanteans being capable of geoengineering. . If they could build one ringed city, they could build more. And there are many claims for ancient ringed cities in other places. Also check out "The Holy Place" by Sir Henry Lincoln.
The problem with the mesurements is that all the lands are still moving, I don't know if I want to go there. The real key to Atlantis is in Egypt, in fact I think that Guiza was part of the atlantean kingdom, the pyramids are much older than the information told. The older part of Egypt is so much better crafted than the newer, my theory is that it was atlantean heritage
The alignments of monument sites is interesting, but I'm not following the why. Why have so many huge monumental construction sites in so many places, so far apart? Is it your hypothesis then that Atlanteans were the proto homo sapians who spread and civilized other hominid groups (Neanderthals and Denisovans)? Also, I'm surprised you haven't brought up or made the connection with the proposed Atlantis sight in western Spain (can't recall the name). But GPR tests showed potential manmade concentric rings that had been filled in by sediment debris from a probable tsunami. Along with a suspected sister site several miles away that was believed to be a memorial with discs depicting a 3 concentric rings. Is it possible that the dating of sites like Giza, the stone circle in Britain, the Rikva in Africa, and gobeglitepi are much older than currently accepted and part of a vast atlantean civilization who's capital was on the Azores Plateau?
I am not a mathematician. However, I understand the concept of obligatory tilt and the wobble of the North Pole. I am wondering if changing the tilt of true north would change, alter or remove any of the discrepancies in measurements. I am also wondering if tracing the timeline of the Earth’s tilt would give us a closer proximity of Atlantis. I have always believed the stone circles of England were a physical reference for Atlantis. Even Gopekli Tepe. I wondered why the entire world went from circular construction to pyramid at the same time. If they are pointing to the location of Atlantis, this is very exciting.
Yes I think you are correct, I need to start projecting alignments back in time using Stellarium before I plot them in Google Earth. Hopefully it will increase the accuracy of some of the alignments. This would be a great example of how to do it: czcams.com/video/MOmbW97uJVo/video.html
If you use the bathymetry to go in 3D and see it from the ground, you can see the purposed spot of Atlantis faced by mountains from the three sides as told by Plato, giving them ample acces to fresh water and for filling up the canals they used in their city. again in 3D, on ground floor you can see the plain towards the harbor area in the Bouré Hole sloping down naturally making the spot perfect for sea trade. Military wise the spot also favored them, like for example just beside the Boré Hole there are 2 hill tops giving a clear view into the ocean and the city simultaneously giving them the ideal lookout spot. From the perspective of a city builder looking, it seems to me this area would be like a gift from heaven.
marvelous! i honestly cannot wait for the next episodes, thank you for all your wonderful work! please keep researching, your theories are the most accurate i have ever heard, so far! there is also interesting to dig in the connection between atlantis and mayans/aztecs, i think i saw something related to their hystory as well that might be a clue towards atlantis. And also, would be so so fascinating to learn more about the lemurians, which were supposed to be even older (30,000-40,000 BCE) and also the greatparents of atlanteans (somewhere in the indian ocean) what do you think? :)
The two right angles at 21:22 aren't a million miles away from the Doñana National Park, another proposed Atlantis location. Also, doesn't the 90º True East line point to Edfu? Great vids!
What always looked interesting to me, in context of this video, if a resettlement from Atlantis into the British Isles (and? Western Europe) did happen, it must have been male ancestors, which carried R1b Y-DNA haplogroup. It always looked to me, like they almost radiated from somewhere in the Atlantic ocean into Western Europe (it looks most obvious if you look up 'R1b haplogroup distribution map' specifically). It never really sat well with me, that they recently migrated from the East or where ever else. Great research and video, as always.
genetixs show's portuguese and galicia , have 2 unique genetics dna code ... and on its way to east it disapears at spain close to madrid. and basque has it too.
I love your Job and it is not for altruistic reasons... You come to give foundations to my deepest convictions built on a little bit of faith and a little bit of diverse information from several very well trusted sources. Are you aware of the stone cubes filmed by a former Soviet Union submarine ROVER back in the 80's of the last century? Or about the "sonar pyramid" found by a Medical doctor (or Veterinary?) from São Miguel Island?
Thanks for your kind comments. I've seen some reports / videos about the pyramid. This has supposedly been debunked, but no-one seemed to want to show any pictures for some reason. I've not heard about the stone cubes. Do you have any links to this?
@@Apocalypse_Tube The pyramid was dismissed on low resolution of the sonar. Regarding the stone cubes, I believe there is some footage on the internet, but I have to research. However I'm pretty much sure that it was internationally covered. Some Newspaper should have it in the archives.
@@fc.672interesting, so much info the comments and of course the video, it’s my first time even hearing of this place and I looked it up because I read it in the comments of another video
Barringer and Tenoumer are both estimated late Pleistocene hits and in close proximity of LGM. My question concerning Richat is its close proximity to all of the rest of Sub-Sahel, central and south Africa. Much of Africa appears to have survived intact whatever activated the Pleistocene Holocene cusp. She still has her megafauna while the west lost nearly all. She has her primitive tribes and several have kept the cultural traditions especially the passing down of history as they know it. Aside from some fantastic stories concerning their past encounters, non that I am aware of give mention to trade or any cultural intercourse with a super power from same continent. It would seem Atlantean people and their abilities would have been at least noticed by the ancestors of the African people whom survived and remain there till this day. It would seem they would have given a far more detailed dissertation to their youth than what Sonchis was able to give Solon. It just seems odd but its possible those still alive some 11,000 kya had no clue of a neighbor just to the nw. My input is all speculative but I look at what we know and then take all the nuanced ingredients which I feel need to be there to support such a powerful thing as Atlantis. Fresh water comes to mind. From that, good loamy fertile soil for plant life. A non glaciated playground and I have a strong suspicion an area of unimaginable spiritual significance. Realizing that region of Africa probably was not always a hot dry wasteland of which sand grows absolutely nothing. How far back was it green with topsoil? I'm not even sure academics could agree where all the sand came from much less when and that also goes for what we're taught was the cradle of civilization, all the way up into Anatolia. However, across the ocean was and remains the Amazon. Pharmacy of the world in the arena of Shaman, medicine men. Abundant fresh water all the way up from Patagonia to Canada. Big tropical zone right dead center that is not sand desert but super fertile topsoil and that continues north as well. I see it this way, the east lost shoreline, a static rise of water encroachment, quite possibly some crustal displacement in the Atlantic as well. Watching the beach disappear is one thing, living south of the catastrophic source is something else entirely. With what we're learning about the Laurentide and Cordilleran and them possibly melting in rapid fashion may be the reason there's little credence given to the west being an ancient hub of anything. There's nothing left to study till you approach the Yucatan but some rounded off earth works scattered about in US. I would not yet rule out the Maya and that protrusion of the Yucatan out into the bay of Campeche. Big hole now filled with limestone and sediment is there, partially on what's now land and about half in the water. It would be interesting to know if the Chicxulub impact convulsed rings and an upheaved dome. Perhaps one day Lidar can see. Much later but the Maya would have known what it was, they were Valedictorians of earth & sky. It would seem to me to provide a most spiritual site to call home. And all around are pyramids and submerged sites we're just now stumbling over. It is all so mind blowing to think about, and it may well be it was centered central ocean or in the east. We'll keep striving together to find our way home, no?
You're way off on the richat structure bit. You need to be doing these measurements with south pointing upwards. The actual location you should be measuring is just south of the city itself. It's what's being portrayed on that map by Kircher.
Very interesting . Thanks for all the research you've put into this . It seems abundantly clear now there was indeed an ancient world wide culture or people that shared very similar levels of knowledge and technology . And also that these people didn't not leave any written records that we know of or that is understood of at present . They must obviously have had a sophisticated form of communication , thus inferring a common 'language' of some sort . Why is it not 'written ' somewhere ? Even in rock or stone ? It is my personal belief and opinion , that the ancients DID leave messages and communications , and is it in in their dimensions of their structures and geological locations . They knew perfectly well that any form of language would be difficult to interpret for any new people or culture , especially after an extensive period or time or at the conclusion of a worldwide impacting disaster , of which they were also fully aware occurs from time to time on planet earth . They simply left the information in plane site for all to see . And we're left sitting here counting stones on the pyramids trying to figure it out .
Yes, I think they may well have tried to communicate to future generations with geometry, but our civilisation went down a different path, where we adhere more to mathematics and formulae. It's not so intuitive for us to read what they left behind. Perhaps we just need a little more time.
@@Apocalypse_Tube one thing that i think solon would have thought of when told about precipitous mountains, would have been on a size of say Mount Olympus. so, if the terrain around the elevated area to the north of the richat is low, i don't think the egyptians would have been able to communicate the awe if Greece is already mountainous. the azores, however, must be at least on the scale of the mountains of greece, or larger.
Would these geographic landmarks align if you take into account that tectonic plates move? If you turn back the hands of time and account for that, probably find interesting results.
I shared your channel and videos on my FB. I got around 3k people on my friend list. I hope it help and you get more subscriptions because you well deserve it.
Sarsen is a sedimentary rock, specifically sandstone. The holes were left behind by the roots of trees or other vegetation before the sand had even turned into stone.
But... if Atlantis (and its circled city) was in the Azores... that renders the richat absolutely meaningless... so there's no correlation whatsoever...? There IS a link between the great pyramid, Stonehenge, and the fabled lost city... (imo) but this isnt quite it.. 😉 you're getting warm, but keep digging.. 😉
One in the same thing back then. Newfoundland was driven away from the Azores Triple Junction over the last 200 million years. The majority of the Azores Plateau formed between 20 to 7 million years ago, long after Pangaea broke apart. However, some of the periphery of the Azores Plateau is much older, you can see where the western portion of the Azores Plateau (on the North American Plate) fits into the Newfoundland Bank and Flemish Cap like a jigsaw piece. I guess the point I was trying to make in the video, is that an ancient culture may have mapped the world and figured out that everything used to fit together like a giant jigsaw puzzle. Without the understanding of modern geology, they may have incorporated this information into their creation mythology. Given that the triple junction (the Azores Plateau in our present day) was at the centre, it might explain the mythology of the naval of the world or the axis-mundi, especially as Delphi sits at the same latitude and was considered by the ancient Greeks to be the centre of the world. Hope this makes sense.
I make it out to be 30°45'08"N, 12°15'09"E. It looks like a whole lot of sand, but who knows what might have been there 11,600 years ago. Definitely worth a look.
6:40 that’s the problem with audiobooks and podcasts: when Graham Hancock talked about this map, I failed to look it up! - Still: the Azores show up as a group of islands: not as a plateau.
I think the work of Mariobuildreps is worth a mention here. His appearance on the Brothers of the Serpent podcast is a great summary of his work and in addition his ageing of Avebury in following video czcams.com/video/CB5NVtsd3wQ/video.htmlsi=ZfgjHWKu83ZXqrmT
Great video, would love to see more people find your channel. Perhaps you could try to contact someone from Randall's podcast and share the precise location of the city and maybe get their take on it.
but it's way bigger then u think and as described the middle of atlantis had a huge statue of posedion ... so this was ore or less the middle 37°59'56"N 26°23'12"W • 12 m 38°06'27"N 26°33'53"W • 11 m this is the statue of poseidon it makes 23 km . 39°28'13"N 30°05'20"W • -50 m this is a dam 1200 km by 5 km 34°06'15"N 38°01'06"W • 13 m this is the entrance of the center of atlantis 37°40'08"N 25°08'17"W • -9 m this is the remains of the statue of cleto poseidon wife. 37°44'30"N 26°15'31"W • 7 m here is remains of a wall or bridge. 36°29'56"N 28°51'53"W • 7 m on this one is remains of a city 37°46'48"N 28°16'13"W • -57 m
Randall Carlson and yourself state that the Richat is too large to be Plato's city of Atlantis. But in the 2011 documentary Visiting Atlantis where the Richat Theory originates, they state that Plato's city of Atlantis was about the right size for the #Richat. In the documentary he writes, "1 stadia = 185 m, 127 stadia = 23.5 km." He then shows a map with the circular features of the Richat being approximately 23.5 km. So who is right here?
I'm going to get into this in a few weeks time as a small part of another video. You get a diameter of 23.5 km when you add the wall that ssurrounds the city at a distance of 50 stadia.
Here's something else I just thought of. There's a theory about Atlantis in Morocco, called the Souss-Massa Hypothesis authored by Michael Hubner. This is part of it: "Michael’s research does not only shed light on the prehistory of Morocco and on the way Plato might have worked but also on a misinterpretation of the original Greek text that became common sense: In ancient Greek the words “Atlantis nesos” (Ἀτλαντὶς νῆσος) do not necessarily mean “island of Atlas” but can also be translated as “coastal empire of Atlas”. This mistranslation is to blame for the fact that Atlantis is usually referred to as a submerged island and not as a coastal empire destroyed by natural disasters." So my question is, could other things have been mistranslated as well, including the size of the city?
Meh...the one in main land England I find no interest in this search. I personally buy the richat is formerly atlantis but I do wanna check out your actual theory...the one out in the ocean.
Where did u get your research from.. Horrible video don't bother watching if u believe the Richat structure was Atlantis...... How is there concentric circles? All u talk about is YOUR calculation of stadia????
Not an assumption. The organic material found in the mortar of the Great Pyramid's interior has been carbon dated multiple times. However, I do speculate that the Great Pyramid, and potentially other structures were build over the top of much older primeval mounds.
It's laughable to believe that Atlantis (azores islands) are related by any means to the builders of megalithic structures and the pyramids (all built after Atlantis downfall). I know that recently some years ago an atlantean portuguese seafarer discovered with his instruments a big pyramid submerged between two of the islands of Azores. But it probably was built by a different racial culture and invasive to the real natives of the Atlantis, and in the final epoch prior to their downfall. You want to have an insight of how looked Atlantean arquitecture? Then just look cities like Porto, Lisboa or Coimbra and the famous stone pavements of Portuguese design. Real ethnic Atlanteans (portuguese and galician people of haplogroup R1b) never used pyramids in their arquitecture and culture, they prioritized other kind of structures with different functionality (like the classic portuguese forts) and also they gave nature and specially trees (like celtic druids) a more protagonic development in their society. Those who built pyramids, temples and megalithic structure belongs to a wider group of racial cultures from the east (like those from haplogroups J1/J2, G2, E1b, C2, N1, Q1, O1/O2). Pyramids are a characteristic fixture of sumerians, phoenicians, canaanites, mayans and orientals in general (chinese pyramids)
...astounding. If these alignments were all intentional, then this culture had a genius and connection with nature that we have not even begun to replicate.
Pointing out a possible mistake people make in reading (following) Plato's description of Atlantis:
Note at roughly the midpoint of the Critias, Plato describes the citadel of Atlantis as being surrounded by concentric circles of water and earth. The outermost circle of water being 27 stadia from the inner island had a connecting canal that lead to another 50 stadia allowing passage to the sea. Plato's dialogue can be confused to make people think the 27 stadia is inside the 50 stadia distance for the canal, which it is not.
Quote: "And beginning from the sea they bored a canal of three hundred feet in width and one hundred feet in depth and fifty stadia in length, which they carried through to the outermost zone, making a passage from the sea up to this, which became a harbor, and leaving an opening sufficient to enable the largest vessels to find ingress."
Take note he starts this passage with "And beginning from the sea..." meaning our direction from here is inward leading toward the city. He continues to describe the canal which was built being "50 stadia in length, which they carried through to the outermost zone, making a passage from the sea up to this". "Up to this" is the outermost concentric circle of water, where he continues and states "Which became a harbor". He describes the outermost concentric circle of water as an 'inner' harbor. By this description alone, the outermost circle of water was a harbor. This outermost circle to the center of the island was a radial distance of 27 stadia. From this point, he states "...up to this" being the harbor there is 'another' 50 stadia distance of canal leading the sea. To maintain the diameter of a concentric circle, the 50 stadia radius from the sea to the citadel's outermost ring is doubled for 100 stadia, plus the diameter of 27 stadia for the ringed zones of the citadel, that is 127 stadia total.
Plato's dialogue describing the concentric circles surrounding Atlantis:
Quote: "...the largest of the zones into which a passage was cut from the sea was 3 stadia in breadth and the zone of land which came next of equal breadth; but the next two zones the one of water, the other of land, were 2 stadia, and the one which surrounded the central island was 1 stadium only in width. The island on which the palace was situated had a diameter of 5 stadia. All this including the zones and the bridge, which was the sixth part of a stadium in width, they surrounded by a stone wall on every side, placing towers and gates on the bridges where the sea passed in."
Breakdown of zones of water and land:
Zone of water 3 stadia in breadth = 555m (outermost circle)
Zone of land 3 stadia in breadth = 555m
Zone of water 2 stadia in breadth = 370m
Zone of land 2 stadia in breadth = 370m
Zone of water 1 stadia in breadth = 185m (circle around the citadel's inner island)
This is a radius of 11 stadia in total being 1,665km, which has the diameter of 22 stadia being 4,070km
Add the diameter of the center island of 5 stadia (925m) equals 27 stadia in total diameter being 4,995km
Add the outermost circle surrounding the entire city which is a radial distance 50 stadia for the canal leading from the sea to the inner harbor which is doubled for diameter equals 127 stadia being 23,495km for the entire city capital of Atlantis.
* 185 meters equal 1 stade multiplied by 127 stadia for a total diameter of 23,495 kilometers for the entire capital city of Atlantis.
So, if 1 stadia equals 185m, then 127 stadia equals 23.495km for the overall diameter of Atlantis
The Richat Structure equals 23.5km, that's pretty damn close!
Clear and thorough presentation. Happy to accept your identification of the location of Atlantis but I remain to be convinced of all these geographical and geometric correlations. Your work however is thought provoking and may (some day) sway my skepticism. Keep'em coming.
I think this is a very sensible position to hold. Sometimes co-incidences are just co-incidences. I will definitely explore in more detail.
You should write a book putting all this together; it’d help to see the calculations and measurements on paper and to explain the relationships between the sites.
It will come, still more research I need to do before I get to that point though.
Ive stared at that crater, but assumed it to old... and for its purposed age to be so young, and yet nearly filled, makes it sound as though the crater experienced the same muddy flood as the fabled city!
Be great to take a core sample and find out!
This series of vids are some of the best, perhaps the best that I’ve seen over the past decade
I hope Jimmy sees them and shows Joe Rogan and your message gets out there.
You may very well be on to something here.
I love the work of Howard Crowhurst and Randall. I hope these guys see all this info too.
Too work sir
Thank you for your kind comments. Cheers!
@@Apocalypse_Tube i wonder if there were civilizations before atlantis, but yes we should focus on proving atlantis to exist first lol
This channel provides one of the best analysis and possible location to Atlantis. I hope it grows and gets the visibility it deserves
@@aquila4228 yessir
briliant video. but whats at the right angle south of Spain, pillars of Hercules was to the right of this, perhaps one of the islands close to the pillars of hercules that sunk that Randal Carlson spoke about, speaking of which, i love Randalls series on Atlantis and why it was the Azores, have you seen it?
This was an EPIC video! I love the way you present your information and edit your videos. You are one of my favorite CZcamsrs.
Wow, that's very kind of you. Thanks!
Just as I said in a comment on another of your videos, Plato's writings describe the Atlanteans being capable of geoengineering. . If they could build one ringed city, they could build more. And there are many claims for ancient ringed cities in other places. Also check out "The Holy Place" by Sir Henry Lincoln.
This^
One story
Unlimited ancient city’s
The problem with the mesurements is that all the lands are still moving, I don't know if I want to go there.
The real key to Atlantis is in Egypt, in fact I think that Guiza was part of the atlantean kingdom, the pyramids are much older than the information told. The older part of Egypt is so much better crafted than the newer, my theory is that it was atlantean heritage
The alignments of monument sites is interesting, but I'm not following the why. Why have so many huge monumental construction sites in so many places, so far apart?
Is it your hypothesis then that Atlanteans were the proto homo sapians who spread and civilized other hominid groups (Neanderthals and Denisovans)?
Also, I'm surprised you haven't brought up or made the connection with the proposed Atlantis sight in western Spain (can't recall the name). But GPR tests showed potential manmade concentric rings that had been filled in by sediment debris from a probable tsunami. Along with a suspected sister site several miles away that was believed to be a memorial with discs depicting a 3 concentric rings.
Is it possible that the dating of sites like Giza, the stone circle in Britain, the Rikva in Africa, and gobeglitepi are much older than currently accepted and part of a vast atlantean civilization who's capital was on the Azores Plateau?
I am not a mathematician. However, I understand the concept of obligatory tilt and the wobble of the North Pole. I am wondering if changing the tilt of true north would change, alter or remove any of the discrepancies in measurements. I am also wondering if tracing the timeline of the Earth’s tilt would give us a closer proximity of Atlantis.
I have always believed the stone circles of England were a physical reference for Atlantis. Even Gopekli Tepe. I wondered why the entire world went from circular construction to pyramid at the same time. If they are pointing to the location of Atlantis, this is very exciting.
Yes I think you are correct, I need to start projecting alignments back in time using Stellarium before I plot them in Google Earth. Hopefully it will increase the accuracy of some of the alignments. This would be a great example of how to do it:
czcams.com/video/MOmbW97uJVo/video.html
If you use the bathymetry to go in 3D and see it from the ground, you can see the purposed spot of Atlantis faced by mountains from the three sides as told by Plato, giving them ample acces to fresh water and for filling up the canals they used in their city. again in 3D, on ground floor you can see the plain towards the harbor area in the Bouré Hole sloping down naturally making the spot perfect for sea trade. Military wise the spot also favored them, like for example just beside the Boré Hole there are 2 hill tops giving a clear view into the ocean and the city simultaneously giving them the ideal lookout spot. From the perspective of a city builder looking, it seems to me this area would be like a gift from heaven.
marvelous! i honestly cannot wait for the next episodes, thank you for all your wonderful work! please keep researching, your theories are the most accurate i have ever heard, so far! there is also interesting to dig in the connection between atlantis and mayans/aztecs, i think i saw something related to their hystory as well that might be a clue towards atlantis. And also, would be so so fascinating to learn more about the lemurians, which were supposed to be even older (30,000-40,000 BCE) and also the greatparents of atlanteans (somewhere in the indian ocean) what do you think? :)
The two right angles at 21:22 aren't a million miles away from the Doñana National Park, another proposed Atlantis location. Also, doesn't the 90º True East line point to Edfu? Great vids!
What always looked interesting to me, in context of this video, if a resettlement from Atlantis into the British Isles (and? Western Europe) did happen, it must have been male ancestors, which carried R1b Y-DNA haplogroup. It always looked to me, like they almost radiated from somewhere in the Atlantic ocean into Western Europe (it looks most obvious if you look up 'R1b haplogroup distribution map' specifically). It never really sat well with me, that they recently migrated from the East or where ever else. Great research and video, as always.
My mistake, I saw a study on the matter, apparently the R1a replacement in Western Europe happens 2500 - 0 BC
genetixs show's portuguese and galicia , have 2 unique genetics dna code ... and on its way to east it disapears at spain close to madrid. and basque has it too.
I love your Job and it is not for altruistic reasons... You come to give foundations to my deepest convictions built on a little bit of faith and a little bit of diverse information from several very well trusted sources.
Are you aware of the stone cubes filmed by a former Soviet Union submarine ROVER back in the 80's of the last century? Or about the "sonar pyramid" found by a Medical doctor (or Veterinary?) from São Miguel Island?
Thanks for your kind comments.
I've seen some reports / videos about the pyramid. This has supposedly been debunked, but no-one seemed to want to show any pictures for some reason.
I've not heard about the stone cubes. Do you have any links to this?
@@Apocalypse_Tube The pyramid was dismissed on low resolution of the sonar. Regarding the stone cubes, I believe there is some footage on the internet, but I have to research. However I'm pretty much sure that it was internationally covered. Some Newspaper should have it in the archives.
@@fc.672interesting, so much info the comments and of course the video, it’s my first time even hearing of this place and I looked it up because I read it in the comments of another video
Well done! Thank you ✨
Thanks for watching.
Barringer and Tenoumer are both estimated late Pleistocene hits and in close proximity of LGM. My question concerning Richat is its close proximity to all of the rest of Sub-Sahel, central and south Africa. Much of Africa appears to have survived intact whatever activated the Pleistocene Holocene cusp. She still has her megafauna while the west lost nearly all. She has her primitive tribes and several have kept the cultural traditions especially the passing down of history as they know it. Aside from some fantastic stories concerning their past encounters, non that I am aware of give mention to trade or any cultural intercourse with a super power from same continent. It would seem Atlantean people and their abilities would have been at least noticed by the ancestors of the African people whom survived and remain there till this day. It would seem they would have given a far more detailed dissertation to their youth than what Sonchis was able to give Solon. It just seems odd but its possible those still alive some 11,000 kya had no clue of a neighbor just to the nw. My input is all speculative but I look at what we know and then take all the nuanced ingredients which I feel need to be there to support such a powerful thing as Atlantis. Fresh water comes to mind. From that, good loamy fertile soil for plant life. A non glaciated playground and I have a strong suspicion an area of unimaginable spiritual significance. Realizing that region of Africa probably was not always a hot dry wasteland of which sand grows absolutely nothing. How far back was it green with topsoil? I'm not even sure academics could agree where all the sand came from much less when and that also goes for what we're taught was the cradle of civilization, all the way up into Anatolia. However, across the ocean was and remains the Amazon. Pharmacy of the world in the arena of Shaman, medicine men. Abundant fresh water all the way up from Patagonia to Canada. Big tropical zone right dead center that is not sand desert but super fertile topsoil and that continues north as well. I see it this way, the east lost shoreline, a static rise of water encroachment, quite possibly some crustal displacement in the Atlantic as well. Watching the beach disappear is one thing, living south of the catastrophic source is something else entirely. With what we're learning about the Laurentide and Cordilleran and them possibly melting in rapid fashion may be the reason there's little credence given to the west being an ancient hub of anything. There's nothing left to study till you approach the Yucatan but some rounded off earth works scattered about in US. I would not yet rule out the Maya and that protrusion of the Yucatan out into the bay of Campeche. Big hole now filled with limestone and sediment is there, partially on what's now land and about half in the water. It would be interesting to know if the Chicxulub impact convulsed rings and an upheaved dome. Perhaps one day Lidar can see. Much later but the Maya would have known what it was, they were Valedictorians of earth & sky. It would seem to me to provide a most spiritual site to call home. And all around are pyramids and submerged sites we're just now stumbling over. It is all so mind blowing to think about, and it may well be it was centered central ocean or in the east. We'll keep striving together to find our way home, no?
Channel "Bright Inside" share also very interesting opinions about Atlantis. You need to look at them (Author of this channel Apocalypse).
You're way off on the richat structure bit. You need to be doing these measurements with south pointing upwards. The actual location you should be measuring is just south of the city itself. It's what's being portrayed on that map by Kircher.
Very interesting . Thanks for all the research you've put into this .
It seems abundantly clear now there was indeed an ancient world wide culture or people that shared very similar levels of knowledge and technology .
And also that these people didn't not leave any written records that we know of or that is understood of at present .
They must obviously have had a sophisticated form of communication , thus inferring a common 'language' of some sort .
Why is it not 'written ' somewhere ? Even in rock or stone ?
It is my personal belief and opinion , that the ancients DID leave messages and communications , and is it in in their dimensions of their structures and geological locations .
They knew perfectly well that any form of language would be difficult to interpret for any new people or culture , especially after an extensive period or time or at the conclusion of a worldwide impacting disaster , of which they were also fully aware occurs from time to time on planet earth .
They simply left the information in plane site for all to see . And we're left sitting here counting stones on the pyramids trying to figure it out .
Yes, I think they may well have tried to communicate to future generations with geometry, but our civilisation went down a different path, where we adhere more to mathematics and formulae. It's not so intuitive for us to read what they left behind. Perhaps we just need a little more time.
another great hypothesis. keep up the investigating!
Thanks, there's still more to come!
@@Apocalypse_Tube one thing that i think solon would have thought of when told about precipitous mountains, would have been on a size of say Mount Olympus. so, if the terrain around the elevated area to the north of the richat is low, i don't think the egyptians would have been able to communicate the awe if Greece is already mountainous. the azores, however, must be at least on the scale of the mountains of greece, or larger.
Would these geographic landmarks align if you take into account that tectonic plates move? If you turn back the hands of time and account for that, probably find interesting results.
I shared your channel and videos on my FB. I got around 3k people on my friend list. I hope it help and you get more subscriptions because you well deserve it.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
10:27 why the rocks got so many holes in them?
Sarsen is a sedimentary rock, specifically sandstone. The holes were left behind by the roots of trees or other vegetation before the sand had even turned into stone.
But... if Atlantis (and its circled city) was in the Azores... that renders the richat absolutely meaningless... so there's no correlation whatsoever...?
There IS a link between the great pyramid, Stonehenge, and the fabled lost city... (imo) but this isnt quite it.. 😉 you're getting warm, but keep digging.. 😉
at 20:27 pointing to azores, is that not newfoundland canada?
One in the same thing back then. Newfoundland was driven away from the Azores Triple Junction over the last 200 million years. The majority of the Azores Plateau formed between 20 to 7 million years ago, long after Pangaea broke apart. However, some of the periphery of the Azores Plateau is much older, you can see where the western portion of the Azores Plateau (on the North American Plate) fits into the Newfoundland Bank and Flemish Cap like a jigsaw piece.
I guess the point I was trying to make in the video, is that an ancient culture may have mapped the world and figured out that everything used to fit together like a giant jigsaw puzzle. Without the understanding of modern geology, they may have incorporated this information into their creation mythology. Given that the triple junction (the Azores Plateau in our present day) was at the centre, it might explain the mythology of the naval of the world or the axis-mundi, especially as Delphi sits at the same latitude and was considered by the ancient Greeks to be the centre of the world.
Hope this makes sense.
@@Apocalypse_Tube clears it up plenty. I never really looked to much into the plate movements so thanks for the extra explanation.
Holy shit!
Great work!
Thanks!
Cooool, what happens if you flip the triangle generated from avebury, richat and atlantis into Libya?
I make it out to be 30°45'08"N, 12°15'09"E. It looks like a whole lot of sand, but who knows what might have been there 11,600 years ago. Definitely worth a look.
PLEASR MAKE MORE VIDEOS!
Next episode has just been uploaded, enjoy!
@@Apocalypse_Tube LOVE your videos man! You seriously have some of the best stuff on YT. Once you have a Patreon up I will send ya some cash.
6:40 that’s the problem with audiobooks and podcasts: when Graham Hancock talked about this map, I failed to look it up! - Still: the Azores show up as a group of islands: not as a plateau.
The Azores are part of a mountain range which is under water. After the Younger Dryas the sea level rose 400 feet
23:04 11,600 B.C. to 2,600 B.C. is 9,000 years difference , NOT 7,000
Thanks well spotted, I should have said 11,600 years ago (9600 BC).
@@Apocalypse_Tube It was still a very interesting video 👍
The Richat structure was created by under water tidal forces when the Sahara was a sea.
I think the work of Mariobuildreps is worth a mention here. His appearance on the Brothers of the Serpent podcast is a great summary of his work and in addition his ageing of Avebury in following video
czcams.com/video/CB5NVtsd3wQ/video.htmlsi=ZfgjHWKu83ZXqrmT
Great video, would love to see more people find your channel. Perhaps you could try to contact someone from Randall's podcast and share the precise location of the city and maybe get their take on it.
but it's way bigger then u think
and as described the middle of atlantis had a huge statue of posedion ... so this was ore or less the middle 37°59'56"N 26°23'12"W • 12 m
38°06'27"N 26°33'53"W • 11 m
this is the statue of poseidon it makes 23 km .
39°28'13"N 30°05'20"W • -50 m
this is a dam 1200 km by 5 km
34°06'15"N 38°01'06"W • 13 m
this is the entrance of the center of atlantis
37°40'08"N 25°08'17"W • -9 m
this is the remains of the statue of cleto poseidon wife.
37°44'30"N 26°15'31"W • 7 m
here is remains of a wall or bridge.
36°29'56"N 28°51'53"W • 7 m
on this one is remains of a city
37°46'48"N 28°16'13"W • -57 m
Randall Carlson and yourself state that the Richat is too large to be Plato's city of Atlantis. But in the 2011 documentary Visiting Atlantis where the Richat Theory originates, they state that Plato's city of Atlantis was about the right size for the #Richat. In the documentary he writes, "1 stadia = 185 m, 127 stadia = 23.5 km." He then shows a map with the circular features of the Richat being approximately 23.5 km. So who is right here?
I'm going to get into this in a few weeks time as a small part of another video. You get a diameter of 23.5 km when you add the wall that ssurrounds the city at a distance of 50 stadia.
@@Apocalypse_Tube Thanks! I've been scratching my head over this discrepancy for some time!
Here's something else I just thought of. There's a theory about Atlantis in Morocco, called the Souss-Massa Hypothesis authored by Michael Hubner. This is part of it:
"Michael’s research does not only shed light on the prehistory of Morocco and on the way Plato might have worked but also on a misinterpretation of the original Greek text that became common sense: In ancient Greek the words “Atlantis nesos” (Ἀτλαντὶς νῆσος) do not necessarily mean “island of Atlas” but can also be translated as “coastal empire of Atlas”. This mistranslation is to blame for the fact that Atlantis is usually referred to as a submerged island and not as a coastal empire destroyed by natural disasters."
So my question is, could other things have been mistranslated as well, including the size of the city?
@@ancientenigmas8010 There's no way "νῆσος" could be translated as "costal empire"! that would be "Ναυτική αυτοκρατορία"
The Nuraggi are the survivors of Atlantis as are A dozen or so other ancients like Egyptians Phonicians Hittites and Minoans.,
Meh...the one in main land England I find no interest in this search. I personally buy the richat is formerly atlantis but I do wanna check out your actual theory...the one out in the ocean.
Where did u get your research from..
Horrible video don't bother watching if u believe the Richat structure was Atlantis......
How is there concentric circles? All u talk about is YOUR calculation of stadia????
Your big assumption of the pyramid being built 2400bc even though there is zero evidence of that time being relevant.
Not an assumption. The organic material found in the mortar of the Great Pyramid's interior has been carbon dated multiple times. However, I do speculate that the Great Pyramid, and potentially other structures were build over the top of much older primeval mounds.
It's laughable to believe that Atlantis (azores islands) are related by any means to the builders of megalithic structures and the pyramids (all built after Atlantis downfall). I know that recently some years ago an atlantean portuguese seafarer discovered with his instruments a big pyramid submerged between two of the islands of Azores. But it probably was built by a different racial culture and invasive to the real natives of the Atlantis, and in the final epoch prior to their downfall. You want to have an insight of how looked Atlantean arquitecture? Then just look cities like Porto, Lisboa or Coimbra and the famous stone pavements of Portuguese design.
Real ethnic Atlanteans (portuguese and galician people of haplogroup R1b) never used pyramids in their arquitecture and culture, they prioritized other kind of structures with different functionality (like the classic portuguese forts) and also they gave nature and specially trees (like celtic druids) a more protagonic development in their society. Those who built pyramids, temples and megalithic structure belongs to a wider group of racial cultures from the east (like those from haplogroups J1/J2, G2, E1b, C2, N1, Q1, O1/O2). Pyramids are a characteristic fixture of sumerians, phoenicians, canaanites, mayans and orientals in general (chinese pyramids)
Atlantide is the Atlas. At this time the climat was different. There is water under the Sahara (Algeria and Tunisia).
It makes a triangle...........woo hoo....so?
The Richat Structure IS NOT Atlantis. There are similar structures NW of Monterrey Mexico and all over the world. FFS.... LISTEN TO GEOLOGISTS
And there's nothing under the Sphinx because Zahi Hawass says so, right?
This just another way to say the structure in Africa is not Atlantis!!!!!
Azores is to new, also made by volcano activity, couldn't possibly be Atlantis