WAR THUNDER: T-34-85 VS M4A3 (76) W Sherman (WHO WILL WIN?)
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 09. 2021
- In this video we comparing the American tank M4A3 (76) W Sherman against the Soviet tank T-34-85.
In this video we would be comparing the speed, the armor with the and going over more details about these 2 tanks.
Hope you enjoyed it.
Please support the channel by subscribing and liking the video:)
Play to War Thunder! - warthunder.ru/ru/registration?...
Music provided by Epidemic Sounds - Hry
T-34-85 or M4A3 (76) W Sherman? Want more comparisons? Leave a like to continue this series !
Ok.
T32 vs is3 please
russian bias wins ofc, murica is not that great after all xD
KV-2VSIS-2
✌️
Bf-109 vs Spitfire
To rotate really fast in a T-34 (and most Soviet tanks), don't just turn from a standing start. Instead, accelerate forward about half a tank length, then turn. This can cut the turn time by about half.
I noticed this too but I think this applies to most tanks
that's like basic knowledge even a 9yearold realizes after playing the game for 5 minutes but thanks for the useless and overly obvious tip.
Yea! True
And didaniym
I do this with all my Shermans, and all my other American tanks as well
Sherman and T-34 they are not enemies, they are bros in this video
In Korean war however...
@@darnit1944 Uh oh...
How about in 1947
All bros against the Panzer 4 F2
@@darnit1944 and Cuba
2:26 me a german main "haha shernan are too slow"
also me "cry in panther with 4km/h"
Imagine being a German main
@@tilengtr5747 Imagine making an opinion when no one asked mate.
Shermans except for tge m4a2 also has 4km reverse
@@polearm9341 really? in wiki it say it has 5km in RB and 6km in AB
Edit: so i tested it in game and it dose say 4km but by using xray i find out its 4.9km
I know, I know, Im too a german player, the suspension breaks really often
Only thing I hate about the shermans, almost everything is slow, it feels like the match is already over when I finally get to a point😂
@@Rahayu.76 honestly a mobility buff would fix the problems with the m4a3
The sherman is slow? I tought the curchill was decent.
@@Rahayu.76 I'm joking
One of the fastest unit of WW2.
czcams.com/video/uVwFN1Tap7k/video.html&t
They would be super cracked if their mobility was buffed and you would see more crying from German mains. I've still doing decently well in 76 Shermans in most of my matches. Stabilizer is just way too powerful on them.
T-34 crew at the start of the tug of war be like:
Ivan the transmission won’t shift cyka!
We’re going to lose!
What do we do?
Well stop talking and shift harder!
Dima (commander) lines:
What the complete blyat?
Why we moving slow?? Shift cyka, shift!
Xaxaxa very easy win debil.
put some glorious vodka to that god damn transmission grease
You both if failed I'll send you all to gulag
With every second M4 gathers momentum, the pull for the T-34 becomes harder and harder. I wonder what would let loose first a tarmac ripped with nasty T-34 tracks or M4's rubber pads burned. Apart from this being full legit Type 58, we have to separate WW2 time T-34/85 from post-war T-34/85 because these two are thoroughly different machines.
@@HanSolo__ seriously, don't be that guy. It's just a game...
Haha in reverse race he stoped to taunt the Sherman Haha nice
Aka this show russian bias
Like for t-34/85 🗿
Can we truly appreciate that ALL Soviet tanks up to T-72 had no other reverse than service type 3km/h. This is made for the "not a step back" policy, mechanical, and weight savings. But this is still a Type 58 tank, not a T-34/85.
@@HanSolo__ trashreverse in issue of transmission, boi, not of any politics
@@raketny_hvost Who do you call "boi"? Its an effect of the offensive character of the Soviet Armored Forces. it's doctrinal for such an army. Not political as you said. The issue is that the reverse in speed costs a lot of mechanical and engineering effort, even more in production, waaaay more in this scale of manufacturing, adds to the tank weight so further costs and as a side effect allows the crews to pull back. And this side effect is the MOST important out of mentioned when it comes to the Soviet General Command. As well as Syrian, Egyptian, Chinese, Iraq and many, many more. And no it is not a simple transmission issue.
2:30 soviet and allies rushing for berlin, 1945, colourized
Thats true btw
Except it was the US that was slowing down for the Russians.
@СССР General Patton remarked that he could have taken Berlin long before the soviets got there if he wasn’t forced to wait. We waited so that the communists could take the East of Germany and rape and murder German civilians the entire way to Berlin in typical communist fashion
@@benr.9628 yes, i heard about that too, but the soviet also stop at warsaw too, and they have a longer path to run
@@vivelarevolution2835 yeah I know I’m just making fun of the communists lol
Awesome video! I know it's for jokes but it's worth mentioning that Sherman has gun stabilizer
а у т-34-85 дедовский вертухан
@@nevduplenko это не WoT, тут у всех орудий нет разброса
@@iansysoev9462 дедовский вертухан везде работает
Every american When time to talk about Ww2 tanks
И у Шермана лоб крепче
It's not magic, It's STALINIUM!
У нас его называют Деданиум.
Why the M4A3 (76) W is a higher battle rating than the Tiger H1 is beyond me. Think about that.
I wonder how the Jumbo 76 got the privilege to face Jagdpanthers, and Tiger II P’s instead of Panthers and Tiger E’s
Germany suffers, that's why.
@@friedyzostas9998 you're right, but oh wait, Not one german main complain about it and whines germany suffers. But nice coping method, sure it works quite well for you
@@bro3217 Except they do, in the forums. Can't expect much from a guy that unironicaly uses the term "cope" on intermet.
@@friedyzostas9998 better than using cope unironically in real life
If you’re actually being fair with the HE test you should have shot the front hull of the T-34. The Sherman is weak to the trap shot and the T-34 upper hull is weak
Hitting the hull is also an easier shot to make.
I mean the strongest part of the M4A3's front is its turret mantlet, same with the T-34. Driver's hatch doesnt count
@@milesperhour9256 however against HE you shouldn’t be aiming at a specific weak spot on one and then at the worst possible spot on another
@@Constance_tinople As a guy who plays HE lobbing vehicles a lot, this did irk me a fair bit, ngl.
@@ryantcm187 yeah I was kind of just like “????? What’s the point of that?”
The HE survival one shows how many kilograms of drugs Gaijin was on when coding Russian armor.
I wish it was actually OP like that, it gets 1 tapped by anything, anywhere...
@@pauntum It's because the t-34 has a weird bounce armour, but yeah mostly die in one hit as it should
Well remember that there is 90mm of armour in the turret and that the hull was far away from the point of impact.
Yep... like Russian steel slick tracks outpulling a heavier Sherman with rubber pad tracks on dry tarmac. Lol.
@@cuhurun well a lighter tank can pull a heavier one if it's weight is distributed more with the ground right. If you got more surface area with the floor then it will be able better turn that engine power into motion. And the T 34 85 has thicker tracks plus a beefly engine.
Does war thunder model Rubber tracks? I don't think so. Could be wrong, this is purely a guess. I am just begging a question.
Do Rubber tracks even help with traction on asphalt? I don't think so, and I legitimately don't think so. Rubber tracks reduce the amount of sound the tracks make when hitting the asphalt as well as reduce the damage to the asphalt but doesn't improve the performance. It apparently does off-road but the T 34 85s has significantly thicker tracks. If you have evidence for rubber tracks performing better than steel on asphalt then I would appreciate a source.
M4 with add-on armor is 0.7 t heavier.
Wow, there actually is a grip coefficient in WT!
When I first started playing, I was outright terrified of the T34. Now that I've spent about a year playing? T34s are like wasps. Yeah, they can still sting but I got that 88mm flip flop
t34 is a American heavy then, when t-34 is our tank.
Stop switching them
5:59
"Ivan! Comrade! Help!"
"Long live democracy."
0:43 When your brother starts to win tug of war but you have been going easy on him
With stalinium armor, vodka inline engine, Lenin's suspension and with Stalin as commander t-34 wins
The sherman has hollywood plot armor tho
@@tugalord Not only that, the T-34-85 in real life was a absolute failure and was basically a metal shitbox that would be massacred by any tank it faced.. Sherman's were much more mass-produced, better mobility, better gun, etc.
@@ghostman7817 yea...wait a minute *loads M1 garand
@@ghostman7817 ? wth T-34 is the most produced tank during WW2, and pretty much all tank in WW2 is shitbox and wtf lol T-34-85 have better mobility then sherman which is probably the reason why they are able to fend off the germans at a pretty fast pace
@@ghostman7817 hang on a second "much more mass produced" my bollix. The Russians had produced more t34s than the Americans did shermans. From what I have been reading the Americans produced about 50,000 shermans next to (Brace yourself) 84,070 t 34s.
Artillery: Shooting barrel three times
Artillery: *surprised pikachu face*
One year ago the sherman was faster than both the t34 and the panther because it had a 50hp more
Don’t forget that going past 3rd gear on a t 34 requires the strength 5 demigods fueled by vodka
However in an actual battle the Sherman can usually get the first shot, with its stabilizer. They can pen each other's UFPs as well, and usually a one-shot
Zzz
However in actual battle, tank duels are too rare.
T-34 is the overall better tank according to the tank trinity, but M4 has a few aces upon its sleeve which can be game changers.
objectively false, the T-34 throughout it's life was cramped and reduced crew efficiency. It's also less reliable, has worse gun handling, and only marginally better mobility to make up for it.
@@bones-fe3gy You only prove my point lmao
@@friedyzostas9998 how is me describing how the Sherman was both a better design and a better vehicle prove your point
@@bones-fe3gy T-34 is the better tank in tank trinity: armour, firepower and mobility. But if you would know something about tanks in the slightest, you would agree with me that the trinity isn't enough to make well performing vehicles. The flaws that you just enumerated prove my point.
@@friedyzostas9998 it *doesn't have better firepower.* The Soviet 85mm gun and it's derivations have worse accuracy and equal penetration to the M1 76mm, and the T-34-85 suffered from such an increase in weight that it's mobility is essentially a match for the Sherman's. I'm autistic as shit so I've studied this for years.
Сила дедов!!!
T-34 was harder to destroy by HE by shooting its turret is because right under its turret is completely angled. There is no flat surface for the explosion shock to penetrate through. The Sherman has the weakness because it has low top down armor and it is flat under the turret.
i am very afraid of shooting a Sherman's hull because of the jumbo experience so i always get the jumbo and the 76 shermans mixed up alot of times
Keep in mind the t34 was a very snappy suspension
And fragile
Much cheaper though
And designed by an American.
T-34 for mobility
Sherman for gun depression and elevation
Stabilizer is also important. Accurate shot after moving too fast.
@@darnit1944 the stabilazer wasnt that good
@@oleg4057 for reaction shots it saves your ass, in war thunder.
@@oleg4057 I wouldn't say that. The stabilizer really works when braking.
50 cal
5:07 ah yes the stalinium alloys binded together with gulagium alloys are nearly indestructable.
Russian bias in a nutshell
What is the music at the 'Now swimming' portion of the video ????
Nice stalinium lol
I love your vidéo bro
Despite the height limitation on the Sherman, its still taller than the T34
The Sherman were always pretty tall tanks
@@Rio-tl1hw lo eran si los comparamos con por ejemplo un panzer IV, ahí eran donde se veían como gigantes
You are the most popular and awesome👏👏 player in War Thunder. I saw in one video you knocked out my tiger.
Awesome👍👍.
What is that song that starts off the "who's faster" portion of the video?
I still prefer the Sherman bc I’m so used to it’s play style
Not a bad idea for a series. Maybe put in how each gun does against a certain tank from 500m and 1000m
How do you make these custom battles?
Настоящая сталинская мощь в одном танке
*советская
Шерман в реалиях тундры лучше будет
@@yukifukuda1835 сможешь подписаться?
@@yukifukuda1835 Но не по скорости или по броне.
even though the T-34 kinda won this, I would still always chose the Sherman, probably because of the stabilizer.
Korean war showed 100% opposite. While the US and South used WWII M4s the T-34/85 were post-war apart from the initial first batch of trashy T-34 Soviets delivered for the training of the North Korean crews.
@@HanSolo__ They did use m4's as *INFANTRY SUPPORT* but the M26 Pershing was used more often going up against harder targets such as field artillery emplacement's which usually had hull down t-34-85's which would get annihilated.
And gun depression
Stabilizers are one of the best things I've experienced,although I'm a Soviet main but I've tried a couple STAB vehicles and my god they are fun
Awesome 😎
Awesome warthunder tank challenge 🌟🌟💖👍
5:15 t34 showing off stalinium armor
Gaijin: "Soviet Bias doesn't exist!"
Soviet Bias: ....
hi steel nice do the tiger 1 vs strv
I want to know the title of the bgm played at1：19 . Please tell me it anyone .
The one time a Soviet tank out-reverse speed something.
Interestingly, the higher acceleration Shermans gave them the advantage at first, but over time the T-34-85s won thanks to their stronger engines despite slower acceleration.
Actually they both have 500hp engines,but Sherman has better acceleration because it uses a gasoline engine while T-34 uses a diesel engine.
I love even saying this you compared what everyone else compares the armor, mobility, but not really firepower or shoot on the move capabilities, yes the Sherman is slower and its armor not as effective but its the first tank with a stabilizer (kind of). At least to me because that 85 isnt really used by Russia that much in game where as the 76 is used from 3.3 till 6.3 so to me you can master the 76 much easier then the 85 which is only on a select few tanks. Either way I was entertained so great video dude
Both Panthers and t34 feel more like medium tanks and yet shermans have a charm
Panther feels like a heavy tank if you’d ignore it’s mobility.
The Sherman’s rubber pads on the tracks should have enough grip to pull the 34, maybe wt just doesn’t have them coded in
Nice
Надеюсь будет тест стрельбой по лючкам))
I wish this was actually done seriously so we would see which is better but the video was entertaining nonetheless
Steel Guru I guess 1:22 is your favorite song. What is the song title?
1:18 what is the name of the song
you forgot to compare the number of braincell in both tanks
i miss this kind of videos of yours
The part where he was tapping the t34 turent was so funny lol
Steel Guru loves this Music so much
5:53 what music pls
No one needs Food or Stab when you had Bias
5:23, СОЮЗ НЕРУШИМЫЙ РЕСПУБЛИК СВОБОДНЫХ НАВЕКИ СПЛОТИЛА ВЕЛИКАЯ РУСЬ!!!
How exactly is this test fair?
It should come down to which can kill the other faster
Gaijin: steel tracks have more traction than rubber tracks on a concrete surface.
Physics: what?
whats that song named?
Point out they put the film in low gear halfway through each challenge
0:38
Иван: Командир! Нам не хватает оборотов!
Командир: А веры в победу советского народа, тебе тоже не хватает?!
Иван: 0:50
Lol, stalin decided to push them
That end? Scene from Legend with name T-34 bridge scene american version
1:50 name music?
Being fair tho, that sherman 76 high velocity ain't nothing to laugh about (and I'm a firm soviet bias, those things scare me)
i was literally shouting FIGHT BACK SHERMAN!!! there at the end... please remind me why its going at 6.3?
T-34/85 at 5.7 feels insanely outclassed against Panthers honestly ,at least Easy 8 can do something at CQC with it’s stabilizer.
You sure that Sherman has enough spare tracks on it?
Nope. Needs a couple more I'd say
This is power of stalinium xD
german panther : "Allow me to introduce myself !"
Me encantó. ❤️❤️
T34 is my favorite tank. I don't know why but it's cool
Russian bias
Это вы еще в люк мех. вода не стреляли тридцать четверке, там вообще сталиниум стоит!
Still my pick is M4 cause of the stabilizer
Ah yes, steel tracks having more traction than rubber on pavement
The sheer power of Stalinium
M4 Sherman of course, just that gyro stablizer gives it enough advantage.
Can you do type 93 vs R3
If a tank has a teddy bear it does not want to kill you
To be fair, it all depends of your playstyle, both have great advantages for me, nuke shell of t-34 and stab for sherman and also a depression unless t-34.
And sherman STABILIZER
@@tugalord which is over rated. t34 is still better overall
@@frosty848 you'd be surprised how good that stabilizer actually is, allows you to shoot on the move and often get the first shot off in an engagement when you run across someone, as with the shermans you can do a lot of stuff with it, it just depends on you adjusting your playstyle for it, i personally followed the advice of another youtuber and went with the tip of the spear approach or even flanking
@@frosty848 in war thunder is mostly who ever have a shot first is the winner & I can tell you didn't really have experience with the gyroscope
@@keeganfox1864 Only good against weak targets. The sherman only tickles tigers and panthers. Doesnt matter if you get the shot first if the shot doesnt do shit
1:40 what is that song
1:16 Song name please i really need it badly
czcams.com/video/geUhpM4GwLo/video.html
It's horrid
New vid: shermans vs T34 vs tiger
2:34
This scene makes the T34-85 is mocking the Sherman like:
T34: Ey, next time, upgrade ur engine, u slow
2:05 nice drift bruv
Anyone got the name of the song at 1:33?
Same
Kinda curious which tank wins out in an IRL battle. Since things like reliability, quality of components, or getting stuck in mud arent things to worry about in war thunder
IMO
Reliability = T-34 wins however Sherman is easier to repair and the american troops had more access to repair parts.
Quality of components = Depends on the model but i would say the Americans have an edge.
Stuck in mud = T-34 wins.
Overall i would say the T-34 wins in a 1v1.
@@AnonyMous-ql9nj How tf T-34 wins in reliability imo???
@@AnonyMous-ql9nj reliability is 100x better on the Sherman bruh
"russian bias is a meme and doesnt exist" Meanwhile T-34 eats a half dozen modern howitzer shells to the face for breakfast.
Dude look at the fkin turret placement, the gun mantlet is 90mm and there is nothing directly below it except for the slope plate and the optics on the driver hatch
5:07 Component of T-34 is Stalinium
50. Cal stabilized gun gun depression is good while Russian tanks have a bad depression and non stabilized gun and they have stalinium too
the sherman is slower in reverse cause it never had to
yo i always get one shotted front on using the t34 (its like as if they dont need to aim, just shoot, i checked with the simulator shot and the whole front is green, bruh)
1:40 what is the song
По всем параметрам наш лучше!)
Stalinium is getting real here…