Questions for Pseudoscience | Cold Fusion
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 07. 2024
- QFS Shop: sfsf.shop/support-qfs/
Support QFS: www.patreon.com/QFS?alert=2
Twitter: / realqfs
Facebook: / questionsfor. .
sources:
• Brief Introduction to ...
• Legitimate Cold Fusion...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_...
The Science Asylum channel
science.howstuffworks.com/fus...
• Cold Fusion: How it works
www.BigThink.com
lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page...
/ reddit
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philo_F...
• Brief Introduction to ...
• Legitimate Cold Fusion... HYPERLINK
• FREEDIO: "The Sun, fro...
pixabay.com/videos/sun-heiss-...
www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
www.flickr.com/photos/9745374...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:...
Images:
steelfabservices.com.au/who-i...
newenergytimes.com/v2/library/...
ui-ex.com/explore/firework-dr...
www.flickr.com/photos/ifl/723...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
www.flickr.com/photos/tattoo7...
pixabay.com/photos/crucible-f...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
pixabay.com/illustrations/meg...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
pixabay.com/photos/southern-f...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
But what if you had someone yeet a bottle of deuterium towards another bottle of deuterium really, really fast?
well, in theory...
Well you can do that but it would take so much more energy
@@darkscienceyt do you REALLY believe technology isn't hidden from mainstream? Give your head a shake if you thing all is revealed to us
That's a waste of time. Cold fusion is illogical. I will make the old way with my perpetual motion engine. Just give me 1 million in cash and I'll make one for you in a few years.
TEST THIS, SON
I know nothing about nuclear fusion but I do know you are underrated.
hey thank you so much, the really means alot!
i witnessed cold fusion when i got my tongue stuck on a pole
Classic Stalin
You mean *we* witnessed
Hell yeah put 90 percent ice, 10 percent filter water at room temp. One cup of fused ice
Whom did you ask to urinate on your tongue to free it?
Oy Stalin, wouldn't you consider your Rippentrop pact as a cold fusion with the nazis?
Perhaps even something as a pre cold war fusion? 😏🤔
Toyota was probably all like "Tony Stark was able to build this in a cave... With a bunch of scraps!"
FYI:
The Sun's core is *not* hot enough to induce fusion.
Fusion in the Sun's core happens by a continuation of a probable set of circumstances that support Quantum Tunneling.
I think cold fusion may produce results, but it seems like every cold fusion system to date lacks the ability to provide a continuous, high probable set of circumstances that support the Quantum Tunneling needed for the fusion to take place.
Sun core may not be hot enough but so heavy that it's forces the nucleus into each other
@@ompundir7539 Incorrect.
Scientists now know that its Quantum Tunneling that overcomes the electromagnetic interaction between protons.
Temperature & pressure are directly related to each orher. -If one is not sufficient for fusion, then the other is not sufficient as well.
Is this where the introduction of element 151 comes in handy? What if that is the key to the whole idea of cold fusion but the reason why the idea isn’t explored because of some the scrutiny Bob Lazarr has received from the scientific community for his claims of such element? I’m asking an honest question.
@@plissken94th57 Other than Stanton Friedman, I don't think that much of the Scientific Community has scutinized Lazar over Un-Un-Pentium (115).
It has been artificially made. & its named Moscovium.
As for cold fusion.....I don't know what to think about that.
@@adamrspears1981 is there a possibility that element 151 is the key to cold fusion? Although I think the concepts around both our different, I still remember them considering element 151 as a type of fuel. Idk I’m just thinking out loud too because I remember always hearing about cold fusion when I was growing up as a kid during the bush Jr era. Specifically shows like invader zim from Nickelodeon is what caused me to look into it back then.
i thought "cold fusion" was 2 bare metal surfaces sticking together in a vaccuum. i guess i was thinking about cold welding??
Isn't platinum good at absorbing hydrogen? Probably the same with Palladium. At least a quick google search seems to agree. I feel like people can come away from this video thinking that gasses dissolving in solid metals isn't a thing after your comment at 4:15.
Yellow cake
Hundreds of tests have replicated their results.
Toyota being the most famous.
And then four years later we are testing a nuclear fusion reactor amazing how fast technology advances
We’ve been doing nuclear fusion for a while
Just not with any energy generated
@@dylangabriel2703 yeah hope we can harness it soon
Regarding who coined the name cold fusion: Steven E. Jones is credited with coining the term "cold fusion" to describe a phenomenon that was being investigated by the Department of Energy. This term was used to describe the claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, although the two researchers were not comfortable with the phrase being used at the time. Despite their discomfort, the term "cold fusion" became associated with the phenomenon, and Jones' involvement with the investigation also led to a public vote that had a significant impact on the careers of Fleischmann and Pons.
the amount of humor you put in these videos are amazing
Thanks!
Regarding the Press Conference: Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann objected even labeling this cold fusion. They were uncomfortable giving it that name before they fully understood it. They were pushed to do that conference before they were ready to release their findings. They were unconformable with the characterization of their work during the press conference led by Dr. Stephen E Jones( the man who named this phenomena cold fusion). Jones gave it the name cold fusion and they were both very uncomfortable with that. They expressed their concerns about labeling the experimental phenomenon as something they did not fully understand. Their objection stemmed from the fact that they were not ready to fully disclose all the details of their work, wanting to avoid rushing to define the nature of the phenomenon until they had a more comprehensive understanding. Jones worked for the department of energy under Bush. If you take the Marxist approach in analyzing the situation its easy dialectics. Bush was apart of big energy. He was president. He would lose a lot if this was real. When you have an entire generation being told something isn't possible then you have an entire generation of potential wasted if it actually is possible. Nobody is looking at it seriously except open minded and independent researchers not boggled down by the religion of mainstream academia. The supporters of Martin and Stanley made a book about their remarkable story I HIGHLY suggest you read. Its called the discovery of cold fusion and it goes into great detail about everything that happened.
4:09 Why does it make no sense that the deuterium atoms are migrating into the palladium? It's well-known that palladium absorbs hydrogen at high rates. Do the conditions inside the apparatus inhibit this?
That statement invalidated the entire video. Pseudoscience should look in the mirror for their next subject.
@@philipelewis1 He was wrong about the deuterium diffusing into the palladium, but that doesn't mean that fusion occurred. Especially since chemists have studied palladium as hydrogen storage extensively, we would know by now if that's a viable way to force hydrogen/deuterium atoms to fuse.
Every genius was at least once called a "crackpot" by his/her peers. Over half of all advancements have been discovered by accident. If that is not a strong enough indicator to think outside of the box, then I don't know what is! Learn the basics, free your minds from the confines of the tried and true, experiment and tinker, dream, and change the world with a roaring thunder!
By the way, if Pons and Fleischmann were wrong, why did the DoD take such a STRONG interest and invest in their "failure" on the down-low after all that dispensed public humility? The then Bush administration went out of their way to indirectly discredit and ridicule Pons and Fleischmann, that alone is a strong enough indicator that they were on to something tangible!
What caused the two foot hole in the cement floor of P & F's lab was a CHANCE FISSION REACTION when a microscopic amount of the titanium they were using got turned into a fissionable isotope while inside a chemical "soup" that was charged with electricity which caused a chain reaction. While not as fissionable as uranium or plutonium, hypothetically, it is possible for titanium to become fissionable.
Lol
What does this have to do with fusion?
Regarding question 1: The specific mechanism by which the atoms are brought close enough to each other without the use of naked nuclei or muons is unclear from the available information. However, one speculative theory suggests an unknown mechanism, potentially related to cavitation as observed in star in a jar experiments where ultrasound-induced cavitation plays a role in producing similar reactions. This is a popular theory with those of us who are still researching this topic seriously.
"Thank God for cold fusion!" - Terran marine
Third types of Cold Fusion is the cold fusion with TV in it.
Right off the bat you get something wrong about cold fusion. Someone who states that cold fusion reactions occur at room temperature may be misunderstanding the concept. The term "cold fusion" can indeed be misleading. Cold fusion, or Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR), does involve nuclear energy production in a cold environment, but the term primarily refers to the relatively low energy input required for the nuclear reactions to occur which happens under more manageable conditions compared to traditional hot fusion.
Thanks for making this explanation something I could follow 🙂
I was at the press conference. Walked around in shock for days.
@johnnytheprick 1989 in the spring. Other labs were not able to replicate what they claimed. From day one the physicists were very sceptical
@johnnytheprick when announced
@johnnytheprick They certainly believed what they were claiming and thought they had checked it out pretty well but they were not physicists, but chemists, so they were not experts on all the ins and outs of nuclear physics. Word was perhaps leaking out about incredibly important developments at the University, which probably pushed them to the press conference approach.
In hindsight, their method has not been able to solve the world's energy problems, so, yes, it appears they were mistaken. The Utah physics professor who was giving them a hard time at the press conference was completely unsatisfied with their answers/explanations and told the media something along the lines of "if what they were claiming were true, they would have died from the radiation." So the physics community, was skeptical from day one. Envy may have been part of it, but mostly they just didn't believe the claims.
@@yidiandianpang you realize its 100% real and NASA has replicated LENR/cold fusion hundreds if not thousands of times, right?
There is data from John W. Keely of Philadelphia, Pa, back in 1890's from his work shop 1865-1899, about several bench tests done. He had Deuterium even evolved from his resonance + harmonic ratios frequencies experiments when removing Hydrogen and Oxygen from water, at high efficiency with thermocouples, thermopiles, and arrays of vibration tuning forks. (controlled sympathetic attraction concentration of matter.) Information in regard to Cold Fusion tests. His > 100 inventions of his 5 Million dollar Keely Motor Company were known around the world in national newspapers. Some tech details in - "Keely And His Discoveries" and "The Snell Manuscript". (1 out of every 5000 molecules of water is deuterium.) Physics in those days was called Philosophy. He recreated several common known science experiments from 1850's Philosophy book chapters by his new vibrations method , and then also by fake method for laughs, since his contemporaries and visiting tech engineers could not tell the differences, and he figured he was much smarter than them.
If I recall hydrogen atoms do have a tendency to migrate into solid structure when held under high pressure. I do have zero idea on if hydrogen embrittlement of materials happen at room temperature and pressure though, although my guess is probably not.
i work with ultrahigh vacuums, and hydrogen (also helium, but there's less of that around) can get in everywhere. hydrogen can basically just diffuse through stainless steel. slowy, but it happens. so even at 10^-11 torr, you'll still have hydrogen in there chillin.
Just ask Denzel Crocker, without his obsession of Fairy godparents, he figured it out
If we had such a powerful form of energy it would make much much more money than oil will ever make.
Yea they don't like that idea of loosing money for human gain.
This is not how economics work.
@@LSH988 Please go on.
Theres a hot fusion reactor being built in france for the purpose of research and it'll be online in 3 years
Any day now
seriously though fusion had been 20 years away for the last 60 years
@@darkscienceyt i understand our world is built on the shoulders of titans, but people have almost irrational believe that science can solve anything just about any day now. True ai, interstellar travel, general purpose quantum processors etc, things that are near impossible for us, due to the very nature and complexity of the problem. There must be a word defining this specific bias in people. I observed Elon Musk play into that bias all the time as a marketing \ image building with projects that make no sense (vacuum tube transport, underground tunnel networks), it works because he mixes them with realistic things, and by achieving those, he keeps this veil of "anything is possible".
@@darkscienceyt plans were never really put into action, and ITER has lots of backing. We'll have to see.
I know how to do cold fusion, I did it by taking two ice cubes and putting water between them and freezing them together
Cold Fusion? But that's a pretty good ch-
Ooohhh, you mean _actual_ cold fusion. Yeah that's bullsh.
I'm a simple man.
When I see A QFS video, I click
Honestly not a bad video, but I do think there is some definite elitism in the fusion research sector. Kind of rediculous to say tokamaks and other confinement schemes are the only way to achieve nuclear fusion, while people have been trying that same shit for 60 years and not really getting that much closer to breaking through, while spending billions of dollars researching. If I had to bet, I would say if we get commercially viable fusion, its probably going to be a very outside if the box approach to fusion, not a giant torroid with superconducting magnets, because how economically viable is cooling stuff with liquid helium? I come from the particle accelerator world and I know there is nothing environmentally or economically viable about building and running superconductors.
Quantum tunneling happens naturally. Just need to wait about 10^10000 power to turn on an LED light bulb for 0.00003 seconds. As you said, any day now.
Martin Fleischmann was no dummy. His achievements include:
Secretary/Treasurer of the International Society of Electrochemistry (1964-1967)
President of the International Society of Electrochemistry (1973-1974)
Electrochemistry and Thermodynamics Medal of the Royal Society of Chemistry (1979)
Fellowship of the Royal Society (1985)
Olin Palladium Medal of the Electrochemical Society (1986)
You're entitled to your opinion of his work, but let's remember that this man was a genius, and you're a CZcamsr. A little humility might look good on you.
Pons and Fleischmann were chemists, not physicists, what did they know about nuclear fusion? As chemists they knew that palladium absorbed hydroden because its lattice was larger than the hydrogen. Then they needed something to cause fusion. They were just guessing. No theory.
even great scientists make mistakes, and they did in this case. I recall Einstein used to deny the existence of Blackholes and quantum physics principles but here we are.
@@nuzayerov As a youtuber, myself, I would not contradict Einstein even on matters in which current-gen experts in physics do contradict Einstein. I don't really even understand their disagreement, or the math behind their different ideas. Again, humility is good.
you are watching ColdFusionTV
I am no expert, but I asked some of the nuclear physics faculty back in uni about CF/LENR and they told me not to dismiss it. Yes the original experiment wasn’t replicable 100% of the time but a large chunk of other journal published research isn’t either. The protocol needs to be refined, which is why more $ is being invested into the tech today
LENR/LANR/CANR/CMNS is not exactly the same as CF, as I know, those are a much more watered down, much less outrageous version of CF that usually doesn't actually claim that the fusion part is actually occuring.
And the second point is kinda irrelevant and a form of what-aboutism, the fact that some experiments can or cannot be replicated, doesn't really give some other experiments a free pass to be rather not replicable, and it's kinda faulty logic.
also about the not being 100% replicable part, this experiment was kind of not replicable at all, as the failures were much more than the successes and the successes/replications we're at best rather inconsistent and at worst a few of them got retracted/explained by various errors. (e.g. Georgia Tech and Texas A&M Papers/experiments one of which was redacted and explained later by detectors false-positives and the other redacted/explained by tritium spiking/contamination)
@@AK-kh7sx wrong, LENR 100% claims fusion is occuring, and is 100% real. NASA uses it on a daily basis
@@EricM93
I'm really sorry but you are completely wrong.
LENRs are specifically refined as non-fusion-based nuclear reaction that are based on electroweak interactions rather than strong-force interactions according to the Library of Congress and other sources.
This is a quote form the Library of Congress on LENRs that highlights this:
"the class of non-fusion-based nuclear reactions that occur at or near room temperature."
From here:
id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2015003070.html
So you are completely wrong about your first point, and also for your second point (about the NASA thing), unfortunately I'm going to need some citations and sources.
@@AK-kh7sx You can use whatever quotation you want, you are the one who is wrong. the LENR experiments conducted by NASA, Navy's China Lake lab, and Los Alamos, have all clearly shown the production of helium 3 and other elements in nuclear fusion reactions. There is clear transmutation occuring, which necessitates fusion. You are incorrect. Type in Lattice-enabled fusion NASA into youtube, and you will see that there is indeed fusion occuring.
Must have been nice trying to debunk reality, but unfortunately reality still exists.
@@EricM93
I'm really sorry about that.
But that's not how science or research works.
You can't just say "you can cite any reference you want but you are wrong" without providing any evidence or references of your own.
It's just completely non scientific, non reliable and useless.
And then you come here and say experiments conducted at whatever labs shows that it's real. Well, show us the research papers, references, articles, whatever. Show us some quotable scientific piece of evidence about these experiments that has been published in some credible scientific journal or sth.
Transmutation according? necessitates? According to who? Your own words?
And I'm sorry again here.
CZcams videos don't really count as proof or citations or whatever, as they are usually not that credible. Anyone can make a CZcams video about anything.
As a side note, by CZcams you are referring to the video by NASA's Glenn R&T it's on LCF, not LENR.
LENR stands for Low Energy Nuclear Reaction
LANR sands for Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reaction
Which is not necessarily low energy in nature.
And LCF is a part/subset of LANR, as it is not low energy, it is not cold fusion, it's only lattice assisted, apart from that, they are bombarding deuteriums with fecking gamma radiation mate, do you get this? It's not cold fusion, and not anomalous excess heat, it's just confined in a lattice, bombarded by gamma rays, which results in the fusion.
And as for you final retort, it's just ridiculous and useless, it's like school playground insults and taunts. Just grow up mate.
wow i don’t even know this exist until i watched this video, so i’m probably living in the depths of the ocean
Good video!
Any day now lol….. so the temperature needed for nuclear is so high that you are better off with the cold instead?
What's the current state of technology for inducing fusion with tokamak devices? I remember reading at some point that they can maintain over 100 million degrees for a couple minutes at a time, but they weren't producing as much energy through fusion as it cost to maintain that temperature.
Currently its getting pretty close, as it would turn out the efficiency of a fusion reactor is closely related to the size of the reactor chamber, ITER theoretically will be the first reactor to produce more energy than put in at a rate that could be economical. Its set to be completed in the next 10-20 years and fully operational in 20-25 years.
This was a great video I can’t wait for the next one!
Any day now
aNy dAy Now
Any day now
Any day now......
Any day now ;-;
Any
Day
Now.
Thanks!
Fusion needs heat hotter than Christina Hendricks? OMG! That is incredibly hot!
Do a video on the thunder storm generator plz
I should have figured he'd use Christina Hendricks as a comparison, after all, he watched Mad Men.
;)
@@darkscienceyt what can I say, someone's got good taste in humans of the opposite sex.
Well, I guess it is the day now, as of like 6 months or so, I'm pretty sure.
1:36 So... Basically you saying that atoms just have an orgy?
Didn’t some blonde lady invent cold fusion in the mid 90s with Val Kilmer?
They made a movie about it called The Saint.
Well, what about fusion ignition?
People will put their faith into anything that gives them hope.
Huh sounds like religion.
Like vaccines? And lockdowns?
1:24 Christina Hendricks
huh, so two dudes tried to create a Minovsky nuclear fusion reactor before it was a thing. Neat. too bad they only work in Gundam's Universal Century. So far at least. *grumbles in lack of GN Drive*
Duh, Chodo-boy invented Cold Fusion for Orgasmo's Orgasmerator.
Ok, now this vidoe makes no sense, so cold fusion is a farce after watching this glib video!
I'm sure I should know, but who was the redhead?
ColdFusion...
...a new thinking
Watching this in 2022 is nice :))))
Yep someday with the right funding
Cold fusion ha much like cold fiction
Gold star for you!
you realize NASA published cold fusion/Lattice-enabled nuclear reactions in 2020, right? It is 100% real and replicated, jackass
Whats it like to be just so wrong?
It’s just 30 years away
i thought this is a diss video on dagogo
I'm still waiting for the fusion
I define "cold" as 7500K
What about option 3. Cold fusion cells. Where like in a combustion engine you inject deuterium ions onto the metal plate. While using mangets to increase the pressure to encourage fusion. We know fusion can happen in great pressures as well as temptures. Reason for the cells is to direct flow as well as increase the chance of fusion by having 2 flows colliding.
You run into a similar problem to option 1- magnets of the strength needed to do that need a LUDICROUS amount of energy to hold the charge required, so the energy investment is going to be amazingly high, probably too high to get any meaningful output from.
Assuming you find a problem for that, you then have another problem- material strength. A number of different factors are going to make our little magnet box fall apart really easily under such high charge, pressure, and resultant heat. How can we keep this thing together without it falling the heck apart?
The core of the sun is 15 million celsius. So much much less for fusion
Are there any research papers (even failed experiments) that resulted from toyotas $40M research?
Well the research would have been privately funded so they can retain it if they like. The research was most likely useless, and you don't really publish useless papers. I'd like to see them too myself
There's no such thing as useless research, even negative results are still useful results, any data can save time and money for the next group of researchers.
Dont care how "foolish" someone thinks an experiment/research is, all analysis that follows the scientific method is useful to humankind.
Beach&BoardFan while theoretically true this sort of thing is asinine.
Nature isn’t going to publish mr joe schmoe who has verified the existence of gravity by dropping a tennis ball three hundred times.
Doesn't have to be published in a premier scientific magazine, it doesn't have to be published at all... just make the information public.
Beach&BoardFan if they didn’t get any data that is novel, it doesn’t make any sense to make the research public. It makes them look bad wasting money on bad science, and putting the effort into making it public is not worth it. No one cares and no one is going to read it if all they did was confirm our already established laws of physics.
"CENSORED" lmao
Go Utes!!! Oh, wait...
Hey, love your videos, but, and it's a big butt, the core of the sun doesn't seem to be anywhere near the 180,000,000 degrees sited in this video, the number I'm seeing is closer to 27,000,000.
not to be confused with the youtube channel of the same name 😅🤣
I dunno, it's hard to get hotter than Christina Hendricks. Have you seen her Firefly episode?
wait isn't cold fusion a property of metals that happens when two bare pieces of a metal touch and fuse
what you mean is called "cold welding"
@@Lucas-dj8tf oh thanks a lot
(・-・;)ゞ
Robert Greenyer, ever heard about him ?
I live under a rock
What happened to the bleach video?
its coming back when i literally have a life :D
Hold up… turpentine enemas? That’s a thing?
Toyota of all people😂
I clearly remember this fiasco, amazing how gullible people who should know better were, and are.
Stoyan Sarg and Randell Mills both have GUT models which are better than the standard model, and both models appear to be the same, when one accounts for the different perspectives of Stoyan (geometric/structure) and Mills (mathematic/physical). Both models predict cold fusion without gamma emissions. I have seen the cold fusion experiment twice, done successfully. Once was Hagelstein at MIT, and once was a physicist I met at Burning Man. Excess heat was measured. Deuterium is detected. Tritium is detected. Helium is detected. None of these were from atmospheric contamination.
Go on fixing the humors of the body with your other 99% of doctors. We're working on germ theory. Aah, metaphors.
Hagelstein at MIT is quick to point out that scientists are people, too... just as subject to the bandwagon affect, appeals to authority, and confirmation bias as the rest of us.
My hats off to Fleishmann and Pons, both of which are world renowned in their fields, to which you will never hold a candle.
Good luck with that.
I thought the core of the sun wasn't hot enough for fusion but the only reason it happens is because of quantum tunneling.. the pressure and temps get it started and help but it's the tunneling that keeps it going.. at least that's what I think
Cold welding, the fusion of two metal parts without using heat. It's a type of cold fusion.
Not necessarily, cold welding doesn't combine atoms into bigger atoms, it just forms solids of the same type of atom into one solid.
Like glue or something?
ok but... who was the woman?
I'm thinkin' ... Marilu Henner? o_O
I'm going to build a battery for my phone, using my phones battery and it won't be as powerful 🤣
“Cold fusion “ should be used in place of “bad science”
you realize low energy nuclear reactions are 100% confirmed and NASA has replicated it thousands of times, right?
Cold fusion is possible because of quantum tunneling fusion happens at any temperature just faster in extremely how temperature it's to complicated for me to explain quantum tunneling on a comment that probably no one will read but just so you know because of cold fusion everything in the universe will become iron in about 10^3300 years
Still relying on steam turbines... How about we make plasma turbines.
prahlada Stanley if you know how to make something more efficient and cost effective, then hit me up with ur plasma tubes build, I’ll work on them with you.
@@joshman9757 I was being facetious
Well, theoretically (and statistically) "cold" fusion is possible with no special conditions (like palladium lattices). Temperature is just a measure of the speed of the particles (atoms, molecules), and there is a statistical spread of speeds, so the chances are that one in several trillion trillion might be moving fast enough that it can happen spontaneously. It just wont be much of a commercial success, or generate useful amounts of energy. Heck, with quantum wave equations, a car can be both inside and outside its garage (just very unlikely to make its way outside overnight; so unlikely that it probably wont happen in several billion times the age of the universe, let alone overnight - OK, "several billion times the age of the universe" was an under-estimate, but you get the idea).
There is nothing to say cold fusion is not possible, we just may not have found the conditions that make it viable; no wonder Honda thought it worth investing a bit.
or you just as disclaimer debunk of cold fusion technology how about you can build your cold fusion technology doing experiment
Actually, we will if we can produce more antimatter. Antimatter produces antiprotons which are protons with the opposite charge also known as negative protons. The only way to commence cold fusion is through negative protons, hence the reason we would need more antimatter.
Do you understand how much energy is required to produce antimatter?
Sorry to be that guy, but the symbols you used for degrees centigrade and degrees Fahrenheit (2:09) are wrong. The degree symbol is on the right of the letters, i.e. ℃ and ℉, respectively.
Who Else thought he meant the cold fusion tv CZcams channel?
What..... the fuck
How's life?
Good
Good
N I C E
Lit, i wwnt to bronycon
@@kungfukitten6735 how bout no?
Woof yes, I know those two. They shook at me, yelling out, 'WE KNOW YOU CAN SEE AND HEAR US GODDAMNIT!!! ... We Just want to know...Were we RIGHT or WRONG about cold fusion?' In the second half of their lives they were consistently bogged by the fact that the scientific community itself behaved no better than grade school children and made them a laughing stock even when they know they themselves didn't act as good as they could have, it was a form of bullying that no one sought to stop. And unable to reconcile with that fact they spent the latter half of their potentials bogged in by this past.
They were willing to give me their brains and everything, asking me if I could, I could spare them the chance of ever being born again. I do not really understand what makes them think I would ever agree or keep to their request, or could do what they asked, but I do it anyways to what I can.
Inside their brain, the original idea sourced from ONE (original null element), is that
the inter-atomic pressure existing within a structured lattice could serve substitute for the KE requirement to surpass the coulomb barrier.
In your regular equation for KE relating mass and velocity, what the two held in the deeper layer of their mind back then was the relationship of KE vs pressure for the achieving of a force vector compression upon material things. When a thing had no velocity, it did not mean there was no energy, there is no MOVEMENT or KE, but KE is only a small fraction of the equation and was not an absolute requirement to surpass the CB. A zero velocity thing (at absolute cold, or abs hot, or for example abs relative motion even), what it has is a conversion of KE into Inertial Mass(again, to see what I'm talking about here you have to understand and look at observation itself, anything discussed in and of the material world in terms of its relations to each other, the frame of reference; abs relative motion for example is inertial mass because any offset to that state of uniformity would be a resultant resistance or inertia to its original tendency, there are also other reasons but the list goes on too long to cover here), and that can serve as work potential.
Looking at the animation you've setup in the video:
The belief of squeezing De into the palladium came from their observations of current. Known observations will tell you that hydrogen can adsorb onto the surface of the metals involved during electrolysis and then pass in thru it (you have to remember that although they didn't pass their work thru hard peer review, when you have guys like Toyota doing a hiring, it is because their own science team sees the some of these processes involved and as a conscious decided to fund further investigation into the matter, if these things did not pass thru their mental check no person in the science community, much less private companies, would've even made a replication attempt to begin with.)
I do not know if cold fusion works (explained in the P.S.), but there is some thing I'd say that should've been accounted for but was probably not and that one of them was the intermediate reactions, if conditions for low energy fusion reactions can be made, then the individual performing such things should account of all possible modes by which the fusion of the particles they were working with, and that meant factoring in De-Tri, De-He3 fusions as well, because different levels of saturation/accumulation can act as another barrier of resistance they they have to circumvent to continue the reaction. This kind of rationing is similar to the rationing of critical mass in the nuclear reaction, but you can see is like a negative, where one concerns analogously minimum materials for plaque formation on teeth, but the other considering at which point do you have so much plaque built up that the rate of decay and build up of additional plaque equalizes? That the minimum materials for plaque formation no longer reaches a spacing where they can setting and form plaque? etc, etc...
The reconciliation of no gamma detection and stuff can be made afterward with things like the reacting chamber (being the metal) absorbed the shock and so heats up, etc, etc. But the real downer where S & P failed to give lead on was that they did not run thru the maths, in their haste they pretty much shoved away any chance they had of sitting down with the 4-eyed people whose tool is the pencil and paper to discuss the balancing of numbers and that did not help with their wanting to achieve cold fusion (me implying that the above paragraph can be mathed).
before I get back to sitting on my ass playing games all day...what do I ultimately think about cold fusion?
learn to sort your frames Bobby, didn't Hiro teach you to touch on the smallest of strings? You do all that work for it to do some work and become so focused on the having work done that you forget why you started to do work in the first place; we men are blind, every action has consequences beyond our wildest imaginations, touch on the smallest of strings, no one cares what you want, no one knows what you want, but the one thing every one can tell you of what they are sure you are not going to want, is regret, you won't want that, at the end you will not want that...
The computer scientists require the machine to cool down more to attain 10 GHz, the programmer just asks have ya'll ever seen Man cook a batch of eggs? And well that is another very long...story...
Overall processes like these for example are good if you happen to have excess De as a byproduct of something else from another process that has been integrated into your daily life/activities and you do not know what to do with that excess De you generate. Same as your own feces, when you eat and subsequently shit as a result, and you thus compost that shit in your garden etc and it grows some plants; taking this analogy, I would not eat specifically to shit so that I can use that shit to power up a generator, that to me is equivalent to saying you can achieve over unity, but no matter how intricate you've made it, in the end you only made an exchange with respect to the entropy of information. The some of ya'll keep repeating there is no free energy, but dog is like, well why then do you keep acting like there's free energy (don't answer, such things are meant to be rhetorical, for one's own introspection).
-dog
P.S. do not expect the typer of this message to do for any of you 4 eye lab coat guys any maths, the kid has a high level education in math and physics, and has not yet gotten to play with the cogs and wheels used in graduate studies, this will not happen for another two thousand something years which is not in this particular guy's life time, in this lifetime he chose to be a MADAO.
Oh yea I forgot, someone's going to wonder:
So how exactly did the two think fusion was going to occur supposing there was enough inter-atomic pressure to confine De atoms together?
Wouldn't that be like having society pressure 2 straight guys to share a room&bed and expecting them to start giving each other head? It's absurd (room lols). I mean that barrier just seems too out there.
Alright just shootin pool here wouldn't take this as anyone of their words just my take on it:
Ideally they were looking for
1. isotonic state of pressure once the right participants of a reaction would get in a room together (so they have no where/nor desire to go). (Do keep in mind ALL the participants that will be involved; when you get De-De fusion you have to account for the extra room needed to accommodate subsequent reactions of De-He3, evolution of H2(g) (as lone proton is a resultant as well in some pathways), escape of He4 within the lattice, De-Tri fusion and subsequent chains such as neutron decay, resulting in a positron and spare electron to further neutralize the next set of De+ adsorbed on the Palladium surface as they are course in by flow of current; and the effects of these participants and their changes on the pressure state within the system.
*S & P are crying again* it's okay, no one could've expected you guys to see that far ahead, dog understand.
2. Taking your 2 straight guys example, sure maybe pressure alone doesn't necessarily force them to start giving head; it would've been the same had you a straight boy and girl on one bed, you pressure them to share a room they not going to get baby making (this is not rocket science guys, dog no understand rocket science). To get them baby making you have to set the mood, you know whole shebang with the candles, the music, the smell of attraction in the air however you be imagining that one. I thought the video made by electroboom about moving particles with the chladni plates was pretty good as a picture for this number 2:
czcams.com/video/9po11qjCWxA/video.html
There is the point you have to consider, the one of when that first urge comes in for the guy to just shove in his mojo(gotta keep it pg-13), be like I can't take it anymore!
And two, for them to keep doing it once they see what they are doing, I don't care if you a man, we just going to keep going...put a bag over your face maybe and have you wear some silicone padding.
Nothing new here, you have it going on with regular fusion; but in regular fusion they are already super hot. In a cold fusion, the only way you going to get that, I suppose (if you can get it at all), is like the scene of Vegeta first going SSJ4 with Bulma's device, rather than compared to say Goku first going SSJ from having watched Frieza blow up Krilin.
Soooo...in a chain of events we might have observed the current passing around the Pd, bounds the metal and things inside it, compression and tension as a result of De squeezing thru, the frequency of the current meanwhile exciting the inter-atomic and creating microscopic vacuums from just simple Brownian motion that then forces a radiometer effect, which on their scale is like you putting earth in a box and flipping that box around which so has the atoms run up against the wall of the lattice they stuck thru but find themselves unable to escape, they touch bodies in the most nerve wrecking of ways, immediate struggle to get away, but the box keeps getting man handled in such a way that in the subsequent struggling of the men to not shove it in one another so happens that when 'I'm trying to pull out here! ffs fyi.' and the room moves opposite their pulling out and drives it more in and finally they just give up, stuck as a helium with a bit of juice having leaked out to no one's asking; alright wait maybe that wasn't such a nice candle smelling soft music scene as I had led one to think earlier...but ah just imagination at work.
see...what exactly does the dog do?
dog no give you answer, you are the ones who pass the toughest and strictest of exams that no one in modern era has right to criticize, certainly not any stupid ass millennial (no offense guys), so why you ask dog? dog can take your inquiry, give it dog's best possible spin in the range of possibility it see, that all dog can do.
You then find answer, that is if you are still having the strength to be looking.
Dog remember. Before you left dog, you say you want be scientist. So you are scientist, so be what you are, dog no interfere.
//Edit:
Ah, since the picture drawn might have been a bit out there, a more realistic picture might be that imagining the getting together of two bubbles you blow in the air and merging as one without them popping. If in a condensed/pressurized state of being, and a stray current so happens to pass in between the two atoms squeezed tight within the lattic or however the experiment is setup, then I think it may be possible to make a snip in the CB whereby when the barrier is reforming, that reforming force actually adds to their keeping together. You can think of this like one car tailgating another where there is this sweet zone whereby the car behind is just within the slipstream left by the car in front and is actually getting sucked in towards it as a result; some bit way off and the wind resistance becomes super high again, but some bit in, just right, there is the rush of wind that used to go against you suddenly to going in your favor of keeping with the front vehicle. In the actual setup, the equivalent to this slipstream would be the current from electrolysis and the positioning of the two particles be the confinement within the Pd lattice, this would be likely what you would be trying to achieve if you are aiming for some kind of cold fusion and where I think requirements for CF lies.
airplane or even being able to speak to person on the other side of world did not make sense either in its time... just saying.
A guy already separated hydrogen from oxygen in a car,dead videos took off line.
no! the earth is definitely flat!
Nah
@@brimstone1355 and 5G is gov't mind control technology, and our gov't are reptiloids
@@Paberu85 yeah i already know that
Cold fusion is possible, just not using the brute force method. Its amusing watching a species that calls itself intellegent use brute force nearly eveytime. Even your rockets are nothing more than glorified water bottles with a nozel at the end. Not very forward thinking.
Leading to a false theory
Guys, trust me! Socialism will work! We just need time! 0:37
Just checking in with this channel to see who I should mock, scorn and cancel next. Please forward this video to the US Navy and to China so they can stop spending millions on developing this technology.
What is this nonsense?