Benjamin Disraeli: Father of Modern British Conservatism
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2021
- With Academic Agent: / @academicagent
Re-uploaded (edited) from AA's channel, the original video can be found here: • Cigar Stream #76: Asse...
Donate here: www.subscribestar.com/apostol... - Zábava
I just discovered this channel and have thanked God for sating my appetite for intellectually engaging historical discussion.
I was just thinking I wanted to read Blake's book on Disraeli. I need to learn more about angloland.
Thanks so much! I hope the other Cigar Stream appearances of his truly will also show up here on his channel.
The Lenin Cigar Stream will pop up next week in lieu of the usual episode of heterodox.
@@ApostolicMajesty I would love to see a stream didactic to Fredrick the 2nd of Prussia. It seems to me that he is the embodiment of what aristocracy true means, I would also love it if you could prob a bit of Thomas Carlyle's thoughts on Fredrick the 2nd and maybe even his thoughts on Cromwell.
Or you could try to do a Heterodox stream on Carlyle great man theory of history and what Carlyle sees as great Aristocracy.
Many thanks.
10/10 excellent career and character description as well as great food recipe source
Something I don’t quite understand is the reason for Britain to antagonize the Russians in favor of the ottomans.
Was Russian influence in the balkans and Mediterranean really that threatening to British holdings or was there further motive for Turkish presence in Europe? Or was it totally justified and Russia would have continue to expand west?
The only two elements I can accept as having any worth are that of Trade (and how different Empires relate to it), as the British Empire was benefitting heartily from the Ottomans.
And control of the Straits, ofc.
But by n large the Anglo attitude towards Russia was bloody bizarre.
Reading propaganda from the Crimean War really drove it home for me.
Incitement to conquer the "Asiatic Semi-Pagans", and an attitude that apparently the WASP has more in common with the Mohammedan, and that the Mohammedans faith bares more truths and likeness to the wasps aswell.
Truly bizarre stuff.
From what ive heard it was probably fear of its massive size and population dominating the continent.(which eventually happened following ww2) and russian advancment into central asia threatening india which the russians might be able to threaten better. Its possible the russians may have been able to build up a large fleet that could cut the brits off at the suez if they were allowed to break out of the black sea. Thats what i got for pragmatic reasons
After the Napoleonic wars Russia was considered the preeminent land power, Britain was just contesting a rival from gaining further influence. 'First the straits, then all the Mediterranean' is how they saw Russia.
@@corneliuscapitalinus845 Britian was worried about Russia, and contested Russia globally. Indeed, Britian was concerned of Russian expension into India, and over this, Britian and Russia contested for control in Afghanistan throughout the 19th century. Further, the main motivation behind the Crimean war for the British (and the french too but to a lesser extent) was destroying the Russian fleet and prevent it from threatening them.
And yes, the Russians would have expended as far west as they would have been able. Their policy was expansion until they meet resistance.
Curiously, the soviets were far less expensionary than the tsars. They were more concerned about protecting what they had than any kind of imperialism. They were content with friendly regimes, even if they weren't communist themselves
Because the Turks never had the potential to be a threat - unlike the Russians, who, with their own global Empire, presented an alternative vision for the governance of mankind
I kept expecting Mr Arlis ( ? ) to suddenly retreat from his temperate monologue on equality, & what have you, and dramatically cry out “ Pull da strings ! Bool da strings ! “, with a Middle European accent..
Israeli allowing a certain diasporic to sit in the houses of parliament was the worst thing
@Fellow Æthelweard He was a Christian.
no he wasn't dip, and he is the origin of Middle Eastern Conflict that extends to today....good man my balls, and on the back of a Rothschild influence I'm sure @@wj2429
It all falls on Cromwell for letting them back in.
55:00 minute - the hidden hand. Unconscious on the part of the actor, or mimicry of the real thing? And Paul Keating, Australian Labor PM in the early 1990s, left school at 15.
Necker is someone who effectively defended the importance of property ownership as a prerequisite for admission into parlamentant.
The parlament, he thought, might otherwise risk devolving into an enviroment where factionalism and metaphysics dwarf stability and pragmatism. Upholding property rights protected by the legal order thus becomes a concrete concern shared by all members, wheras, on the opposite end, an "aristocracy of orators" would dimnish social stability inside as well as outside the walls of parlament
No boring word games for the first 45 mins 0/10
That was surrealist.
Can you explain your reactionary thought please. Thanks
Looks like my comment got removed.
I'll try it again without the links.
England under Lord Beaconsfield by Clayden
Disraeli by the Earl of Cromer
(non sychophantic)
2:30:10 what book is he referring to? anyone know?
Starkey calls Disraeli a kind of philosophical descendant of Disraeli, but he distinguishes Disraeli as far more capable and blessed by innate talent, intellect, and culture than BoJo ever possessed. Disraeli, Starkey says understood both sides of the electorate he was appealing to than Johnson ever did.
1:18:50 this is the dirty detail of Free Trade no one wants to talk about or admit
I dont understand what happened here, they were treating this like this was AA's show on AA's channel, AM even said once "I hate to plug my own show." Did I miss something? Also what happened to the ending?
As you can see in the description: this is an edited re-upload of a Cigar Stream from AA's channel many months ago, which he was kind enough to allow me to post here. I've edited this video down by 45 mins to get the video closer in length to an average episode of heterodox as AA's streams are typically over three hours and mine only two.
@@ApostolicMajesty what a very weird thing to do..
I thought I was going mad
Not really. I didn't cut out anything relevant to topic at hand, if you watch the original, AA spent nearly an hour responding to the chat's fascination with food which led immediately after to his spin off food stream on AA Gold. If anything it would have been far more perplexing for an audience without context or access to the original chat, to figure out what was going on. I haven't had to edit the Lenin stream for example, because the whole stream was more or less on point.
@@ApostolicMajesty ok, that's fair, yes.. but the main question is, how do you feel about that famous UO 176a disappearance? Cheers.
Disraeli had been dead for 7 years in 1888.
Not you Apostolic, , but that other guy? He is not a a historian.
He certainly does not have degree, and provides no citations.
Academic Agent
The other guy, Academic Agent, has a BA at Royal Hollway and an MA at Oxford. He didn't study history, but I think he knows a little about the world
Britain has lied so much about the economics of colonialism. It was inevitable that they’d be found out now.