Creating energy for daily life out of photosynthesis: Jenny Zhang at TEDxUHasselt

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 29. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 20

  • @jonathandaubin4968
    @jonathandaubin4968 Před 6 lety +3

    Good direction to pursue , great talk for general understanding. Jenny Zhang is a gift to humanity.

  • @marcbreckleful
    @marcbreckleful Před 7 lety +2

    Natural solutions is where we should start looking for more energy. Photosynthesis is a great foundation. It produces energy already, now we must expose it by what Jenny is doing. Great foundations for great things to happen.

  • @timomarttila7752
    @timomarttila7752 Před 8 lety +5

    Good idea - worth developing even though I prefer natural photosynthesis and sustainable management and utilization of biomass.

  • @alexciocca4451
    @alexciocca4451 Před 6 lety +3

    Use up the oil as fast as possible then see how fast alternative energy sources are born

  • @giybetcikodu5592
    @giybetcikodu5592 Před 10 lety

    Yes yes we all agreed. Do it now.

  • @tacobaco1404
    @tacobaco1404 Před 4 lety +2

    bro im just here for biology bro, im just a kid, i cant have opinions.

  • @ahmedgalaxy1402
    @ahmedgalaxy1402 Před 10 lety

    Very good idea.
    I like it.

  • @weewee33wee44
    @weewee33wee44 Před 10 lety +3

    This is the lecture which USA & China goverments need listen to !! And they won't !!

  • @mkz2386
    @mkz2386 Před 4 lety +1

    shes so nervous lol

  • @currishev
    @currishev Před 10 lety

    @ 3:23 B.S.
    it's not intermittence that is the "renewable" energy problem, but it's pitiful flux:
    just compare power to weight ratio of two generators, diesel and wind-turbine or solar panel. That means the material, thus energy, needed to produce PV cells, w-turbines (those ridiculous blades &masts), tide buoys.. is so enormous that it defies purpose in the first place. They are huge, heavy, hardly transportable, easy to destroy by accident or by terror act..
    Yes, fossil fuel must be replaced but it's not that easy in current state of science and technology.

  • @samahchaouche253
    @samahchaouche253 Před 10 lety

    If i understood well,they want to use water to create a new source of energy.....but they forgot that water is not that abondant .. Human beeing and every life on this planet needs water to survive some populations like in south africa can't even find water to drink .. Correct me if i am wrong!

    • @verifymyageful
      @verifymyageful Před 10 lety +2

      Water is abundant, and after consumption it almost always survives in the form of some solution. Access to clean water is the real issue.

    • @samahchaouche253
      @samahchaouche253 Před 10 lety +1

      ***** but the water they are using is clean,right?

  • @currishev
    @currishev Před 10 lety

    I'm not biophysicist, still she hasn't enlighten me with anything.
    It's not scientific-like level of reasoning: if nature had billions years for evolving photosynthesis, we can develop it in few dozen years.. reason insulting B.S. We've been desperately stuck with controllable nuclear fusion for 60 years already.
    Jenny, show us thermodynamic calculations for efficiency of artificial photosynthesis prospect processes, if u know what i mean..
    What the purpose to this "kitchen talk" is? Fund raising? vocal exercise? what??

  • @ahmedgalaxy1402
    @ahmedgalaxy1402 Před 10 lety

    Very good idea.
    I like it.