Hebrews 5 - A Priest Forever in the Order of Melchizedek - Steve Gregg
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 05. 2024
- thenarrowpath.com | In this presentation, Steve Gregg discusses Hebrews chapter 5. He notes that the author of Hebrews later hints at the topic of Melchizedek in chapter 7, and suggests that this connection should be taken into consideration when interpreting chapter 5. While Hebrews 5 has traditionally been interpreted as a warning against spiritual immaturity, Gregg proposes that it may also be read as a statement about Jesus' priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek. Overall, Gregg encourages a careful and nuanced approach to interpreting Hebrews 5, and raises thought-provoking questions about its significance.
Transcript: opentheo.org/i/45936716199179...
Hebrews 5
New King James Version
Qualifications for High Priesthood
5 For every high priest taken from among men is appointed for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins. 2 He can [a]have compassion on those who are ignorant and going astray, since he himself is also subject to weakness. 3 Because of this he is required as for the people, so also for himself, to offer sacrifices for sins. 4 And no man takes this honor to himself, but he who is called by God, just as Aaron was.
A Priest Forever
5 So also Christ did not glorify Himself to become High Priest, but it was He who said to Him:
“You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You.”
6 As He also says in another place:
“You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek”;
7 who, in the days of His flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications, with vehement cries and tears to Him who was able to save Him from death, and was heard because of His godly fear, 8 though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered. 9 And having been perfected, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him, 10 called by God as High Priest “according to the order of Melchizedek,” 11 of whom we have much to say, and hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing.
Spiritual Immaturity
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the [b]oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food. 13 For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. 14 But solid food belongs to those who are [c]of full age, that is, those who by reason of [d]use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
Footnotes
Hebrews 5:2 deal gently with
Hebrews 5:12 sayings, Scriptures
Hebrews 5:14 mature
Hebrews 5:14 practice
#hebrews #hebrews5 #melchizedek #jesus #biblestudy #bibleteaching #stevegregg #thenarrowpath
Transcript: opentheo.org/i/4593671619917942907/hebrews-5
Hebrews 5 NKJV
Qualifications for High Priesthood
5 For every high priest taken from among men is appointed for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins. 2 He can [a]have compassion on those who are ignorant and going astray, since he himself is also subject to weakness. 3 Because of this he is required as for the people, so also for himself, to offer sacrifices for sins. 4 And no man takes this honor to himself, but he who is called by God, just as Aaron was.
A Priest Forever
5 So also Christ did not glorify Himself to become High Priest, but it was He who said to Him:
“You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You.”
6 As He also says in another place:
“You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek”;
7 who, in the days of His flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications, with vehement cries and tears to Him who was able to save Him from death, and was heard because of His godly fear, 8 though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered. 9 And having been perfected, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him, 10 called by God as High Priest “according to the order of Melchizedek,” 11 of whom we have much to say, and hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing.
Spiritual Immaturity
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the [b]oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food. 13 For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. 14 But solid food belongs to those who are [c]of full age, that is, those who by reason of [d]use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
Footnotes
Hebrews 5:2 deal gently with
Hebrews 5:12 sayings, Scriptures
Hebrews 5:14 mature
Hebrews 5:14 practice
www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hebrews+5&version=ESV;NKJV
Thank you Steve, for this teaching!
A Nazarene pastor once suggested to me that Jesus wasn't afraid of death or His suffering. He was not wishing to experience a meaningful separation from the Father that as far as we know had never occurred before. Jesus cried out: "Father, why hast thou forsaken me?" That makes more sense to me.
The teaching that Jesus was separated from his Father is a modern idea.People read too much into the forsaken verse.
ELOI, ELOI,,, IS NOT SAYING GOD BUT HE IS REFFERRING TO THE FORSAKENING OF MAN, OF WHOM HE SAID "YE ARE GODS". MAN FORSOOK GOD AND HE LAMENTS THIS AS THIS WILL BRING ABOUT THE END OF ALL HUMANITY. He is now justified in his final judgement.
Is it possible for a sinless person to go to hell?
Steve, the Rabbis changed the Biblical timeline of the Masoretic script to make it appear that Seth was Melchizedek. They deducted 650 years. Thus is proved by the Septuagint, Peshitta, and Josephus. Jesus was to be prophet , priest, and king. Rabbis knew this and Christians claimed Jesus was a priest from the order of Melchizedek, so they attempted to make it appear that Seth was Melchizedek so as to claim the Messiah had to be from the Aaronic priesthood. I have a great video on this with a recording of a Rabbi admitting that Melchizedek is Seth in their corrupt system. The Reformers didn't catch this error, and to this day it has not been fixed.
Evidence and common sense both suggest you are correct. It would be nice to see Steve do a study on this.
Hebrews 7:11-19
6:40 “he’s making intercession for us in the presence of God…”.
Is Jesus in the presence of the triune God, of which Jesus is the second of the three persons or is Jesus in the presence of his Father?
No. Jesus is God and sits upon the one and only throne in heaven. The lamb that was slain arrives in heaven and takes his throne from the one who cannot open the scrolls and is mute and is described as looking like a semi-precious stone emitting no glory,,, not a god at all.
@@dsheppard8492 if Jesus sits at the right hand of God and if that God is his Father, why is the almighty God not the Father of Jesus?
@@johnarthur2112 Jesus is the Lord from heaven per Paul. What would happen if he proclaimed to the jews, "I came down from heaven?" Our God hid himself in flesh so that he could walk among us and suffer the cross for our sakes. the kjv translators were all died in the wool trinitarians, and made it their job to reinforce this ideology. The same greek words are used for son and sons,,, man and men. What Stephen saw was the "sons of men" sitting at gods right hand. this was the scene in Rev 5 when the Lamb appeared. There were 24 elders seated at the right hand of the throne,,, the newly resurrected saints that He brought with him! Men are at his right hand. as I pointed out above the one on the throne is not God. that is Jesus place to once again rule from. You have to EXAMINE EVERY GREEK WORD FOR YOURSELF. Look up "him" in strongs,,, AUTOS,, ,translated 80 different ways!!! Many of these are errant, translated him instead of them, his instead of their. Only the infilling off the holy spirit can guide you into all truth.
@@johnarthur2112 He does not sit at the right hand. That is the preferential treatment of kjv trinitarians. Sons of men sit at Jesus right hand as seen in Rev 5... Again read Rev 5 when the Lamb arrives and the description of the one on the throne,,, He is stone like and is mute and plain to look upon in contrast to Jesus being described in Rev 1. He is the MIGHTY GOD, THE EVERLASTING FATHER Isa 9;6 He is the creator of all things,, Jn 1, where God once known as Jehovah said he alone did this himself.
@@dsheppard8492 Peter says Jesus is at the right hand of God?
1Pe 3:21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
1Pe 3:22 Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him.
Logic dictates that God here is Jesus’s Heavenly Father.
I'd say David was first. Psalm 110:4- Adonai hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.
David was speaking of Christ, prophesying of Christ to come as the High Priest after the order of Melchizedek. David was not speaking of himself as being a High Priest after the order of Melchizedek.
@@crazydavey2 that's what I'm saying
If you watch the video, Steve says that Paul was the first to prophecies about Christ being high priest forever.
Not Paul, but the writer of Hebrews...
All together interesting subject however only the unlearned would be enlightened by this sermon; yet Gregg errs as do many others saying that Jesus was “human”, which is an invented deception of antichrist who teach ‘mankind’ are somehow related to apes: Nevertheless, there’s no such thing having the breath of life that can be identified as “human” because (as defined) are imaginary creatures never created according to the word of God (preserved in the KJV). The words Gregg should learn to utilize instead of “human” are ‘man’ and ‘mankind’ … that Gregg be approved a workman that need not to be ashamed ...
He only appeared to be human,,, but humans die and he could not be killed. "No man takes my life but I will lay it down". He would otherwise still be alive today. He did not come from the dust of the earth but from heaven,,, as a zygote implanted in Mary. She was not therefore his mother, and he was not human as we understand.
@@dsheppard8492 He (Christ) is alive today though he died on the cross he lives; and yes, his body did come from the dust of the earth through his mother, being a distant daughter of Adam … hence, the world received the last Adam (bodily, “in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:”) therein indwelt the creator of the universe: He wasn’t implanted in his mother, his substance was passed down from through his generations as seen in his grandmother Sara birthing Issac. Genesis 2:23 “This (is) now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.” And vis versa! … Nevertheless there’s no such thing as human …