Prof. Mearsheimer REVEALS the Scenario of a DIRECT US-Russia and China Confrontation
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 07. 2024
- Please remember to like, subscribe, and click the notification bell to stay up to date on all of our new videos.
In this video, Prof. John Mearsheimer discusses the U.S.-Russia conflict, NATO involvement, American contractors in Ukraine, Israel-Iran dynamics, the situation in the West Bank, the potential Israel-Hezbollah war, the rule of the donor class in US politics, the US-China confrontation, and the potential for a nuclear war.
Dans cette vidéo, le professeur John Mearsheimer discute du conflit entre les États-Unis et la Russie, de l'implication de l'OTAN, des entrepreneurs américains en Ukraine, des dynamiques entre Israël et l'Iran, de la situation en Cisjordanie, de la potentielle guerre entre Israël et le Hezbollah, de l'influence de la classe des donateurs en politique américaine, de la confrontation entre les États-Unis et la Chine et du risque de guerre nucléaire.
در این ویدیو، پروفسور جان میرشایمر دربارهی درگیری ایالات متحده و روسیه، دخالت ناتو، پیمانکاران آمریکایی در اوکراین، دینامیکهای اسرائیل و ایران، وضعیت در کرانه باختری، احتمال جنگ اسرائیل و حزبالله، نقش طبقهی اهداکنندگان در سیاست آمریکا، رویارویی ایالات متحده و چین و احتمال جنگ هستهای صحبت میکند.
في هذا الفيديو، يناقش البروفيسور جون ميرشايمر الصراع بين الولايات المتحدة وروسيا، تورط الناتو، المقاولين الأمريكيين في أوكرانيا، الديناميات بين إسرائيل وإيران، الوضع في الضفة الغربية، احتمالية الحرب بين إسرائيل وحزب الله، تأثير طبقة المتبرعين في السياسة الأمريكية، المواجهة بين الولايات المتحدة والصين وإمكانية نشوب حرب نووية.
En este video, el profesor John Mearsheimer discute el conflicto entre Estados Unidos y Rusia, la implicación de la OTAN, los contratistas estadounidenses en Ucrania, la dinámica entre Israel e Irán, la situación en Cisjordania, la potencial guerra entre Israel y Hezbollah, la influencia de la clase donante en la política estadounidense, la confrontación entre Estados Unidos y China y el riesgo de una guerra nuclear.
Neste vídeo, o professor John Mearsheimer discute o conflito entre os EUA e a Rússia, o envolvimento da OTAN, os contratantes americanos na Ucrânia, as dinâmicas entre Israel e Irã, a situação na Cisjordânia, a potencial guerra entre Israel e Hezbollah, a influência da classe dos doadores na política dos EUA, a confrontação entre os EUA e a China e o risco de uma guerra nuclear.
اس ویڈیو میں، پروفیسر جان میرشایمر امریکہ اور روس کے درمیان تنازعہ، نیٹو کی شمولیت، یوکرین میں امریکی کنٹریکٹرز، اسرائیل-ایران کے حالات، مغربی کنارے کی صورتحال، اسرائیل-حزب اللہ ممکنہ جنگ، امریکی سیاست میں ڈونر کلاس کا کردار، امریکہ-چین تنازعہ اور ایٹمی جنگ کے امکان پر تبادلہ خیال کرتے ہیں۔
В этом видео профессор Джон Миршаймер обсуждает конфликт между США и Россией, участие НАТО, американских подрядчиков в Украине, динамику отношений между Израилем и Ираном, ситуацию на Западном берегу, потенциальную войну между Израилем и Хезболлой, влияние донорского класса в американской политике, противостояние США и Китая и возможность ядерной войны.
Dalam video ini, Prof. John Mearsheimer membahas konflik AS-Rusia, keterlibatan NATO, kontraktor Amerika di Ukraina, dinamika Israel-Iran, situasi di Tepi Barat, potensi perang Israel-Hezbollah, peran kelas donor dalam politik AS, konfrontasi AS-Cina, dan potensi perang nuklir.
在这段视频中，国际关系学者约翰·米尔斯海默教授讨论了美俄冲突、北约的参与、乌克兰的美国承包商、以色列-伊朗动态、约旦河西岸的局势、以色列-真主党潜在战争、美国政治中捐赠阶层的作用、美中对抗以及核战争的可能性。
इस वीडियो में प्रोफेसर जॉन मीरशाइमर अमेरिका-रूस संघर्ष, नाटो की भागीदारी, यूक्रेन में अमेरिकी ठेकेदारों, इज़राइल-ईरान गतिशीलता, वेस्ट बैंक की स्थिति, संभावित इज़राइल-हिज़बुल्लाह युद्ध, अमेरिकी राजनीति में दाता वर्ग की भूमिका, अमेरिका-चीन टकराव, और परमाणु युद्ध की संभावना पर चर्चा करते हैं।
In diesem Video spricht Professor John Mearsheimer über den Konflikt zwischen den USA und Russland, die Beteiligung der NATO, amerikanische Auftragnehmer in der Ukraine, die Dynamik zwischen Israel und Iran, die Situation im Westjordanland, den möglichen Krieg zwischen Israel und der Hisbollah, die Rolle der Spenderklasse in der US-Politik.
In hierdie video bespreek professor John Mearsheimer die VSA-Rusland konflik, NAVO-betrokkenheid, Amerikaanse kontrakteurs in die Oekraïne, Israel-Iran dinamiek, die situasie in die Wesoewer, die potensiële Israel-Hezbollah oorlog, die rol van die donor klas in VSA-politiek.
Bu videoda, uluslararası ilişkiler alanında önde gelen akademisyenlerden Prof. John Mearsheimer, ABD-Rusya çatışmasını, NATO'nun katılımını, Ukrayna'daki Amerikan müteahhitlerini, İsrail-İran dinamiklerini, Batı Şeria'daki durumu, olası İsrail-Hizbullah savaşını, ABD siyasetinde bağışçı sınıfın rolünü, ABD-Çin karşıtlığını ve nükleer savaş olasılığını tartışıyor.
Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
#usa #russia #china #israel #ukraine #nato #gaza #iran #palestine #middleeast #europe #politics #political #geopolitics #realism #analysis
US needs to understand that playing Russian roulette with a nuclear superpower is never a good idea.
All depends on their motives. The govt. isn't altruistic. A nuclear war only hurts the vulnerable.
@@Mr196710 no no, my friend, this is not a joke. We are talking about nuclear weapons: everybody will perish, not only the vulnerable ones. This is the reason why the US has not attacked Russia yet: they know that in case of a nuclear war, even the ones in power will die...not only the usual soldiers and innocent civilians. This is the real only reason why the US elites have not invaded Russia yet and this is the reason why they never will. Nobody touches Russia.
That's common knowledge..
czcams.com/video/xrcjiy5y2rY/video.html please watch this. černí baroni = black barons = helper units / slaves during 1950s in czechoslovakia. this how czech army look like before we enter NATO before 25yrs and thats how russian army still look like. there must be some option of automatic translation with subtitles. that jokes are universal.. but i think that u would be really shocked sometimes.
i am sorry this one is with subtitles.. and it is a lot shorter and more explanatory..
I pray the Professor is correct in his analysis. An old South African saying “ it is the dead lion that gets up and eats you “
Physiology of Plunder
When Plunder Becomes A Way Of Life For A Group Of Men In A Society, Over The Course Of Time They Create For Themselves A Legal System That Authorizes It And A Moral Code That Glorifies It.
Fre'de'ric Basiat
In such a scenario the US will lose badly.
Actually the US is already losing.
US is not losing, we the regular working people (middle class) are losing. Which is the whole point.
LOST.
America will not give up
on Ukraine.
The US wasting time, this should have been over long time ago... pure mouth on their part ffs
At the GLOBAL level we need
-Meaningful international law
-Collective security
-Multilateral disarmanent
That is the only way.
WEF and the UN definitely want to be in control. No fan of turning everything over to Neo-Marxists. Horrible idea...
Do we all sing kumbaya before or after this ?
you forget something : to get rid of any kind of mafia.
What kind of an International Government will impose the "Meaningful International Law?" A democracy? How well will a democracy work when there are 49 Muslim majority nations in the world? Not to mention countries like China, Russia, and North Korea are just a few of the many authoritarian regimes in the world. Roughly half of the world's population does not live under a 'democracy' of any type, and they do not have the cultural values and political values of a democracy.
In many of those countries 'might makes right.' They laugh at the notion of 'international law' or 'Multilateral disarmament.'
Instead of arming Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan; US tax payer money should be spent on infrastructure, healthcare, education, homelessness...
America is a makeshift civilization. It was not meant to last
That goes against all crapitalism stands for....
The point of markets is to furnish militaries. It’s not to make people’s lives better. It’s just the US clinging to power from here on out
20% of our GNP is dependent on proxy wars @@ADBLOCKER4CZcams
@@ADBLOCKER4CZcams Ooh! I love that "crapitalism" creative vocab.
What else is a consequence of something else?!
#LONGLIVERESISTANCE
In one of his interviews Président Trump made some balanced response regarding the Israelli rights vs the Palestian rights. I tend to believe that Trump will not be that good proposition for Israel as may be expected by Israel.
30K lies and counting....
Trump….is a Zionist puppet on steroids…..if he’s selected….he’ll do Israel’s bidding to usher in the NWO promoting the Masonic era. Netanyahu is a powerful influence on the U.S and its Neo Conservative criminal cult working in the U.S Congress.
Trump says a lot and sometimes also the opposite of what he said before.
Was it not Trump who had finally decided to move the US embassy in Israel to East-Jerusalem, a part destined for Palestinian state?
You must be kidding to take Trump seriously, lol!
Anyway USA deserves punishment, no matter it was an accident. To give Ukraine free card to target crimea with cluster Munition and to give Intel and USA expertise to find the choosen targets is direct USA envolvement in terrorism (Ukraine uses atcams most on civilian targets). What goes around comes around, USA.
I fully agree
You are 1 trillion % correct. USA Gov. is full of sh!t. Greetings from UK.
Does Russia not use missiles on civilian infrastructure as well? The pot is calling the kettle black here
Once in awhile, we need to see if we ought to reset something in our life - reset the computer to get a clean slate, reset our lifestyle, like stop smoking or drink less alcohol, the world has reached a state where it is time to reset. Hope it is going to turn to be better instead of a WWIII and a complete RESET!
Where do the UN and WEF stand with their global government plans?
i'd say the WEF, and other global power org, are hedging/hoping on limited nuclear exchange. That will allow enough "shock value" to get practically all countries on board for their total control agenda.
but of couse, the ones with $$$ have very large, and well supplied bunker complexes just on case it goes awry, and ends up being much more than just limited, but rather moderate.
Since north of equator weather and climate tends to stay north of the equator (and the same for the south). The south will be in much of a better position post semi- apolopyse....so expect a massive migration to the south for health reasons.
US bears full responsibility, I don't like listening to this guy, way too many compromising statements which is disingenuous.
He is old school and probably isn't aware of Talmudic dominance.
Professor Mearsheimer's logic is putting much more responsibility on US, than Western persons/media and especially politicians like to accept.
On which items did you understand him compromising?
(my overall thinking is opposite, no compromise yet hard critic)
@@friedhelmschroter8124 Academics are different from agenda-driven politicians. You assume they care about logic and humanity. Politicians on average don't.
@@Mr196710 I see a little truth in your statements, but overall you are completely beside the point.
1) Under Western academics Prof Mearsheimer is a very unique person thinking only logical (does not allow any feelings to influence his thinking/opinion) and therefore representing a position contrary to the general Western thinking also by academics which in case of Ukraine is strongly influenced by feelings and a will to deny/not to see undenyable/for people able and willing to think by themselves critically clearly seeable facts and contradictions in the Western also academic narrative.
2+3) The current foreign minister of Germany has put as main subject of her activity the human rights and if I am not wrong many Western countries claim on Iran, North Korea, Russia, China correctly the violation of human rights.
You are right in the sense that Western academics and politicians do not like to address/see Western violations of human rights.
3) Politicians do care about peace. If however the strive to peace led to war then something must have gone completely wrong. The Western denial to analyze what went wrong and set according such analysis corrective action is in case of Ukraine for me looking like the West acting as a mob (we need to keep unity!) to oppress on Russia what the West thinks is peace/should peace mean.
You need to be able to create by yourself, as Prof Mearsheimer is able, certain questions willfully not addressed/clarified by Western media. One of such questions I did ask me was/is: What is the meaning of the US imposed partial global order Monroe Doctrine on the disputed point Ukraine into NATO (West) versus Ukraine never into NATO (Russia)?
The answer I found for myself on such by me created questions led me to believe the West does act in bad intention like a mob against Russia and I got very surprised when I first time saw a video by Prof Mearsheimer nearly 100% in agreement with my conclusion, yet absolutely conratictory of what 99.9...% of Western persons to think/express - I am not sure if 99.9...% is really correct on academics, yet superimposing what media is willing to distribute to the public I think my feeling 99.9...% also on academics is justified.
@@friedhelmschroter8124 The only academics that matter are those that are "think tanks" that the govt. sanctions. Guys like Mearsheimer, albeit extremely knowledgeable, aren't listened to by govt. officials. They don't listen to the Ray McGoverns, Scott Ritters or any other honest and knowledgeable person.
If u dnt see it professor u wasted ur wisdom for 70 years
He is saying that Israel can't win against Hizb Allah and Hamas. So what is it that he doesnt see? My guess is that he is wrong about the use of nuclear weapons
@@sebolddaniel the armageddon and in hebrew harmajaaduun in arabic the malhamatul kubra ....the desperate deep state israel persuit of their false one eyed messiah the antichrist and pushing its pawn (america,nato)into a great war for greater israel the climate agenda the fascist corona control of masses ...enough or u the leftist too
And how many time do you waste to issue fact-/argumentless statements not helping to understand complex conflict situations?
@@friedhelmschroter8124 My what compelling argument. I am overwhelmed
I always learn a lot from Prof Mearsheimer and agree with most of it. I can't agree with the ending of this video, though. He says he can't imagine the conflicts in Ukraine, Israel and potentially Taiwan merging into a third world war. I can. First of all, Russia, China and Iran are military allies. The first step might be Russia arming the Houthis with anti ship missiles, something in the news now. Russia isn't at war with Israel now. If Israel invades Lebanon, this pulls Iran into the fight. We are barely even aware of the tensions between North and South Korea, or of what is going on in Taiwan. Or joint Russian Chinese naval exercises that scare the Japanese. North Korea produces more artillery shells for the Ukraine war than NATO does. The main fusing of conflicts, though, will be when Russia provides advanced missiles to the Houthis, and maybe other resistance groups, to attack Israel.
I don't see any danger of atomic escalation in Israel and Taiwan. On Taiwan it is not even clear if China will invade ever, the West just speaks about increasing danger/fear out of the natural development that China, after its economic success, now puts also efforts to close the gap to US on military and applies indeed aggressive rethoric -yet you have to see that the rethoric US applies on China is also remarkably aggressive (I see no great difference between US and China aggressiveness). And as usual it is not very clear if US aggressiveness if based on trying to get an unjustified advantage versus China or in the target to maintain global order (democracy) as US justifies its aggressiveness.
Iran does not develop the atomic bomb for attack, but as a deterrence against potential Israel atomic bomb attacks. On the other hostilities all sides have learned and are now learning again on the case of Israel-Gaza, but also Libanon/Hisbollah that situation cannot continue as ever, but some kind of final solution is required and here in my thinking Israel is required to take one-sided decisions, because the Palestinians are not able to decide and act effectively.
The only real danger of atomic escalation I can see is in case of Ukraine IF US does stick to the goal, throw out Russia of all Ukraine + then bring Ukraine into NATO. Russia will never ever accept to get thrown out of Crimea and also the problem of the Russian population in the east of Ukraine needs to be resolved (the problem on east-Ukraine is not one of Ukraine getting this area back -permanently repeated yet wrong Western narrative-, BUT HOW TO HANDLE THE RUSSIANS LIVING THERE). The West had the possibility to solve the problem on the Russians in the east of Ukraine by executing the Kiev 2015 treaty, but by whatever reason it failed (I think intentionally decided against realization) to execute a solution where it had some influence and therefore it is correct that Russia now executes its solution alone.
Russia one country the Americans wont fk with and they know
Might as well. To get proof who is the winner.used Nuk so we all see god
В определенный момент России нанесет полномасштабный ответ
Russia is happy to have Chinese and other support, but in the long run this does not help against the combined power of the West. Russia's only chance to arrive at a reasonable solution is, that by the high cost this war causes the West and the potential danger of atomic escalation the US/NATO goal to get Ukraine into NATO was a bad target from the beginning, becomes aware by all people, but especially politicians and media who are at the head of the mob AGAINST Russia, where the mulititude of against reasons clearly show not Ukraine is the reason for escalation, but the West thinks it is morally superior to Russia and therefore entitled to punish Russia.
In how far the West is morally superior to Russia can quite clearly be seen in cases like US invasion into Iraq 2003 and the reaction on this by Western countries outside of the US attack allies (did they provide against this unjustified attack same support they do provide to Ukraine?) or in Israel where 2 of the countries pushing hard for human rights -US and Germany- have expressed their full support on Israel/Israel's actions as human rights violations on millions and war crimes (how can US and Germany then dare to claim China human rights violations on the Uighurs?).
@@friedhelmschroter8124 Keep drinking the kool aid.
I hope you're right.
@verhofstad should grow a brain
How do you deal with the problem from Russia’s viewpoint that any ceasefire only allows Ukrainians to re-build their forces with Western help and re-start the war at a time that suits they
Once a ceasefire is set/achieved I think it would be difficult for both sides to re-start fighting again.
Russian fears have in my view some 20/30% probability, but I think nobody really wanting to continue this war has the higher 70/80% probability.
If Ukraine wants to rearm itself its their internal decision. What has russia to do with it?
@@mesquick There is no problem with Ukraine rearming itself.
However, there is a huge huge problem if the West, a clear enemy of Russia, would provice any kind of support in such rearming actitivity !
The US by itself has decided such rule must be followed as fixed for US specific in the Monroe-doctrine (and in case of Cuba beginning of the '60s exercise by US in threatening atomic WWIII on USSR), in my view/understanding an essential part of the global order US says it is obtaining while other may think only pretends to maintain. If the West to the disadvantage of Russia does not respect such US set rule there is a huge huge problem on the global order !
@@friedhelmschroter8124 You just making excuses for a democracy not to rearm itself against a tyranny agression. Forget about the US and pseudo Russian enemys. The only enemy Russia has is Putin.
Would Russia arm the Mexican drug cartel with anti aircraft missiles?
good question
We have CIA for this
Do you think Mexico will involve himself something that they have nothing to do with it
Drugs are being brought across Biden's open border by Biden's illegal alien buddies. Why would the cartels need anti-aircraft missiles ?
Do the Saudi know at point of time will be next? because end the petrodollar?
Palestine learning lesson from Nazi Germany after WW2 right now... Unlearned lesson hits harder
I thought peace talks were underway?
haha no
No, no effective peace talks are currently ongoing, just some preparation where the West tries all it can to convince some southern hemisphere countries to change mind and join the Western perspective what peace talks should target (complete withdrawal of Russia + Ukraine will become a NATO member), this means 100:0 win for the West.
They are in fact p!ss talks.
Well, apparently Ukraine needs to withdraw from- Ukraine .
@@friedhelmschroter8124 southern hemisphere?
Can see how it is with Biden in the white house... Trump 2024✨
Read the book of revelations.
Is “donor class” the new name?
Directly confrontation in Alaska ?
some retaliation for the terrorist attack on nordstream pipeline could happen in Alaska!
it will be fairgame, isn't?
@@marc-andrebrun8942 Possibly changing the current status of Alaska ?
@@user-ph5yi7en4d maybe!
I have in mind the Peloponnese war by Thucydides between Athens and Sparta, 25 centuries ago.
we have the same pattern today between Washington and Moscow : same strength and same weakness in both side.
if confrontation escalate this could lead to the same end;
i let you find out what happen in Athens in 404 BC.
in that case, obviously the status of Alaska will change.
@@marc-andrebrun8942 Thank you very much for the information.
No frozen conflict
Yeah, I still recall him saying Putin was too clever to ever be induced into invading Ukraine.
Yeah. It's in that same speech from 2016 that everyone was sharing. He was right about some things wrong on others
After years of civil war and the massive armament of Ukraine and plans for Crimea, that was no longer possible at some point.
@@tylerd1297 Mearsheimer is a highly logical thinking person. As such he has a good ability to see the truth on past matters, better than many other people having less details than him and rather relying on their gut feeling and news for their thinking.
To look absolutely correct into the future is an art nobody has mastered yet and if Mearsheimer challenges this by applying logic the results may be true, but only when logic prevails. In case of Ukraine however non-logic US behavior prevailed and this applies in the meantime to all Western people acting like a mob against Russia. In such case also a compared to Biden probably much more sharp and logic thinking Putin can be forced to do things which in case of a logic/normal behaving US would never have happened.
I also still recall the Iraq WMD
The MAD- principle saves the World!! 😊
Why don't you guys talk of peaceful coexistence.. lucky I lived in South Pacific Islands Botswana.. no army no arms.. peace and joy.. of course no manmade religions
This place you are from is owned by the devil that owns almost everyone else . A small island off the European continent called Britain . The reason that there is no war over there is because they devil vacation there .
Mearsheimer can't stop grinning when talking about nuclear war. 😢
Meaning ????
@@friedhelmschroter8124 its been said by numerous ppl (so there is data to support it), that the silent and boomer generations have this vile mentality of wanting the world to be alit b/c they have lived their lives and are ok with it going to total shit for everyone else.
i know its sounds false, but it is true. they tend to be so selfish, and self centered.
Professor Mearsheimer, give us the most terrible news, with flawless logic, but instead of being gloomy, he is cheerful. Is he a psycho or is it a nervous laughter?
Prof Mearsheimer is neither a psycho nor a nervous laughter, but a highly logical thinking person that tries to bring logical thinking to a Western mob that thinks out of glut feeling instead of hard fact logic.
Paul Craig Robert’s does the same thing.
@@pamelastorer8570 Based on your claim "Paul Craig Robert’s does the same thing" I just looked into czcams.com/video/KpMHwFidMyM/video.html and I cannot agree to your statement at all.
I do have in my own, deeper research and thinking based analysis of several recent conflicts a close to 100% agreement with Prof Mearsheimer's view/logic, yet on Paul Craig Roberts I have in the just 10 Minutes I spent to check your statement in best case a 50% agreement and identified several points where my thinking is opposite or completely different of what he is saying, which brought me stop listening to him, as I rather like to spend my time on other points I like to improve my background understanding, like the ever escalating US-China conflict where US seems to be the driver, yet China gave some good reason and where I would like to understand, is US hostility rather based on US wanting to maintain a global order or on US wish not to be replaced by China as the economic global hegemon and based on this some decades into the future as military global hegemon (in my understanding China is already the Asian local economic hegemon with US having zero chance to change this and China's power to catch up to the West has an incredible strength and speed).
Prof. again thinks ! He thinks too much ! It was an accident he said ! He omits to talk about missiles launches ! Was it an accident launching 5 missiles ? Shit !
My understanding: The launch was no accident (targeting military objects on Crimea), yet the fall of the spray bombs on civilians lying at the beach is assumed to be an accident of unclear reason (one possible reason may be a partial success of Russian defense causing deviation from the planned/programmed route, yet this is only speculation but founded by other past incidents).
You think the Ukrainians were targeting a few Russian beach goers or the very large Russian naval base in Crimea ?
@@josephwalsh7546 Are you really sure this was an Ukrainian and not an US target?
Not sure on the US ATACMS, yet on the UK equivalent there is strong evidence UK personnel is doing the programming and in general Ukraine has no capability to identify far distance targets, relies on US support for this.
I don't believe US or any Western country will allow the Ukrainians free control !
What has happened to you? At your age! There won’t be anybody left to think about it. Do you think about? Have no grandkids to think about? Take a break, you’ve earned it
GOD is in control his plan will be fulfield
This man lost all credibility when he said that royal monarch Nazis should be in Taiwan and surrounding China,there's no place for that in a civilized world where people honor each other independence and continents.
Give Ukraine what it needs. Let them decide how to prosecute the war. Moldova then Estonia ?
Nonsense
I do give Ukraine PEACE (or do you insist on getting WAR)?
I do give Ukraine peace (do you insist on Ukraine getting war?).
Mr Mearsheimer sounds more and more like an American lord haw haw... Anyone refusing to give in to dictators is insane. Give Putin what he wants, then Iran, then North Korea and then Xi - surely that will result in peace in our time?
That's not what he's saying.
Америка је себе сматрала демократијом и у време када је имала 5 милиона робова.
Dictatorship (kingdom etc. is the form of rulership that prevailed for many many centuries and still has a quite a huge share today.
Democracy is quite new and it has not really proven that it is any better looking at the cruel things it applied to civilians in Japan (atomic bomb), in Vietnam (chemicals etc.), the multitude of cruel dictatorships it acted to create/support in South America, ...., the invasion into Iraq 2003 based on ????, destroying most countries in the Middle East/North Africa, acting on Ukraine against a clear part of the global order -Monroe doctrine- causing a recent huge war all Western politicians do lie on, Guantanamo, ....(an endless list).
The point is not to give what somebody wants, but what is reasonble and the Monroe Doctrine has a clear message. What do you mean would be the message of the Monroe Doctrine applied on Ukraine? (look at Cuba where US threatened atomic WWIII on USSR)
Peace is guaranteed by atomic and military deterrence, but not by oppression as US does obviously think. Allow Israel atomic bombs, but disallow the same to Iran - if US would have refrained atomic bombs to Israel then US would have the right to refrain atomic bombs from Iran, but for the sake of .... America is now oppressing Iran for the sake to give an advantage to its ally Israel that is applying permenently human rights violations on Palestinians and recently with US verbal and military support war crimes in Gaza, exactly knowing that such Isrealian atomic bombs are a deadly for the Iran. In my thinking extremely bad democratic decision/thinking!)
American action has created the Taliban as a method to fight USSR support on the communist government there and later US got shocked when the same Taliban cause 9/11.
US did create ISIS.
Do you really think all these mainly US actions have resulted in peace? If so, I recommend you to visit some of the countries that suffered US style of peace.
This guy doesnt get tired of parroting russian propaganda.
And you think France/Germany 2008 objecting US pressure that NATO has to invite Ukraine/Georgia into NATO did also parrot Russian propaganda?
And today China/India and most countries outside of the US spere of interest do agree to Russian propaganda is a sure sign for you, that you should believe in Western moral propaganda.
When thinking so, one simple question to you:
How should the US Monroe doctrine (applied in the Cuban crisis in the '60s) be interpreted for Russia for the US push to get Ukraine into NATO?
Is the US push to get Ukraine into NATO in accordance with the US imposed global order, or is this push disobeying/contradictory to the US imposed global order, a US created rule of the global order?
I wish you good luck in doing some own thinking about above question, where you will not find the answer and arguments to support such answer in the on Ukraine case very intelligent Western news propaganda, a moral propaganda such smart that it needs the skills of a professor Mearsheimer to unveal/unmantle it.
se vší úctou, pan profesor nebere v úvahu některé proměnné.
With all due respect, but you do not mention the variables he missed to take into account.
(don't you think better not to issue a senseless comment having zero content for readers, except CLAIM)
An intellectual .