A Simple Problem Thats Not So Simple | A Nice Exponential Equation

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 11. 05. 2024
  • In todays video, I will be teaching you how to solve an interesting problem. Make sure to like, subscribe, and also comment any questions or video ideas you may have relating to math!
    #maths #exponents #mathematics #mathstricks #mathchallenge #algebra #equation #problem #challenge #Olympiad #MathOlympiad

Komentáře • 20

  • @AndreaZambon87
    @AndreaZambon87 Před 24 dny +5

    8 = 2^3 and 32 = 2^5, so the initial equation can be rewritten as (2^3)^x = 2^5
    By the properties of powers, (2^3)^x = 2^3x and the equation becomes 2^3x = 2^5
    The bases are the same, so the exponents must be the same too, hence 3x = 5
    And so x = 5/3
    Seems simpler this way 🙂

    • @Yarkz.
      @Yarkz. Před 23 dny

      Way simpler lol. He made it so much more complicated than necessary

    • @Yarkz.
      @Yarkz. Před 23 dny

      Oh wait, I just realized he showed that method at the end😅

    • @AndreaZambon87
      @AndreaZambon87 Před 23 dny

      @@Yarkz. Oh, I missed that. I stopped watching when he was checking that x = 5/3 was indeed the correct answer.
      Doh! 😅

    • @brianstanley8704
      @brianstanley8704 Před 22 dny

      Yep . .. that's the way I would have done it too. No need for logs in this case.

    • @robertstuart6645
      @robertstuart6645 Před 22 dny

      Much simpler than using logarithms. Plus it, affords good practice in solving exponential equations.

  • @davidchilds9590
    @davidchilds9590 Před 21 dnem

    In the UK, 5/3 is regarded as an 'improper fraction' and is therefore NOT the correct final answer, but should be reduced to 1 2/3 (one and two-thirds).

    • @davidbrown8763
      @davidbrown8763 Před 21 dnem

      Yes 5/3 = 1+2/3. However, for power indices, 5/3 is the better form. If you need to do further calculations based on a result, you will need to use the 5/3 form. Indeed I have yet to see Maths books that do not favour this form - so the answer in the video is preferential.
      I am from the UK. I have never had a teacher who expressed indices a whole number + a fraction - neither have I ever seen it in a text book. There is a logical reason for preferring the improper fraction form of exponentials. Analytically, raising 8 to the power of 5/3 means the cube root of 8, which is 2, is raised to the power of 5, which is 32. This is why I was able to solve the equation in my head - so there is good reason not to get rid of the improper form. Raising 8 to power 1+2/3 or 1.6667 tells you no more than 8 is raised to that power.

  • @davidbrown8763
    @davidbrown8763 Před 21 dnem

    I was able to solve the equation in my head because 8 to the power of 5/3 means the cube root of 8, which is 2, is raised to the power of 5, which is 32.

  • @user-yl3nj7jy6m
    @user-yl3nj7jy6m Před 24 dny +1

    Зачем усложнять решение, логорифмы здесь не нужны, достаточно привести к одному основанию и будет 3x=5

  • @billebrooks
    @billebrooks Před 23 dny

    It also helps if you use log base 2.

  • @rajeshvyas934
    @rajeshvyas934 Před 20 dny

    5/3

  • @SidneiMV
    @SidneiMV Před 19 dny

    2^(3x) = 2⁵
    *x = 5/3* = 1 + 2/3

  • @silviodias7540
    @silviodias7540 Před 18 dny

    8 elv x = 32 ?
    Como 8 = 2 elv 3 e
    32 = 2 elv 5, vem:
    (2 elv 3 ) elv x = 2 elv 5
    2 elv 3x = 2 elv 5, como as bases (2) são iguais
    podemos corta-las e
    3 x = 5 e x = 5/3.

  • @GaryBricaultLive
    @GaryBricaultLive Před 23 dny

    Why is this simple problem stated to be difficult?
    (2^3)^x = 2^5
    X = 5/3 = 1.6667

  • @marknewkirk4322
    @marknewkirk4322 Před 25 dny +1

    sloppy - you need to edit out confusing mistakes

    • @SttmpJohnson
      @SttmpJohnson Před 24 dny

      This guy made the solution way more complicated than necessary!

  • @TheoKleineSchonnefeld
    @TheoKleineSchonnefeld Před 23 dny

    Man kann es auch unnötig kompliziert machen. Wofür hier log?

  • @rikhman
    @rikhman Před 23 dny +1

    Самое дурацкое решение.