Motorweek Video of the 2005 Ford GT and Ford Mustang GT
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 02. 2009
- Motorweek Video of the 2005 Ford GT and Ford Mustang GT - Check out more car reviews at www.motorweek.com - read honest reviews and check out specs bound4love.com
- Hudba
Two of the best fords ever
I'm getting a 2008 mustang GT
I'm so excited
These cars rock! You wouldn’t regret
I love my 2005 Mustang GT! It's underpowered compared to the current stuff but still really fun, it has almost 400 hp with the mods I have on it anyway and I can't use much more around here (no track to race at)
What mods did you add to your Mustang?
@@Jack-yw7bq wow this is an old comment. Tune, cams, long tube headers, full exhaust, underdrive pulleys, CAI
@@ghunt81 dang, my 06 Mustang GT with the auto is stock, except for a K&N cold air intake which gave the 4.6L 3v an additional 15 hp, and the car also has an MBRP dual exhaust with mufflers
Love these MW vids...I own a 2008 GT/CS - a great car...reliable, Hurst manual, great V8 noises, looks awesome! S197s are climbing...snag one soon! 🐎
Got a Black '06 Mustang Gt AEM Brute Force CAI, Ford Performance Racing Cams, Bama Tuned. Ford Performance 62mm Throttle Body. 3.50-Inch Aluminum One Piece Driveshaft By The Driveshaft Shop.
285/40ZR18 NT555 G2's in the Rear. 245/45ZR17 Falken Pro G4 A/S in Front.
KONI Shock and Struts with BMR Lower Control Arms, (Non-adj) Poly Bushings.
That looks a lot like the Ford GT that was used in the movie Le Mans '66
The best and the best
The base price for the Ford GT is $143,345. Man that's a heck of a lot of money.
They are pushing $300000 now
Potato Holly Molly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The wonders of inflation!
It's not inflation; these cars have legit increased in value.
$44K C8 Corvette offers better performance...
No audio?
licencs plate fail at 1:50 hahahha
nice
0-60 in 3.6 seconds
Quarter mile 11.8 @ 133mph... whats wrong with motor trend?
Unskilled test drivers.
High altitude test track...
BuzzLOLOL doesn’t motortrend use a track in Georgia? It’s not that elevated here. About 800-1000 feet.
the 5.0 is back
Too sad they’re so ugly
single over head cam... so SOHC
Yes, a mistake at 03:50... SOHC... not "DOHC"...
*motorweek
2005 Mitsubishi Evo MR smokes this thing.
No, it does not.
@@newfie-dean5803 0-60 4.7 sec for the Evo and 5.2 for the Mustang GT.
From a dig or a roll that evo is toast, definitely most are done while these ponies run free everywhere.
@gorgeusjames Must be a mustang guy.
@@peterbennett4124 Yes I am , and no way an Evo unless high in boost can ever beat an S197.
I had a 2007 mustang gt with the upgrades gearing, i hated that car. Sure, it was fast, but boring to drive. I raced it alot and beat quite a few cars, lots of 350zs, turbod 240s, a 1g audi s4, and other mustangs, etc, but it never felt that fast. It also heat soaked like crazy, in hot weather it felt like it had 50 less horsepower. Also, it was scary at speeds over 120mph, it was darty and the steering was too light.
My 1996 mitsubishi 3000gt vr4 was much faster in a straight line and i could drive it at 140mph comfortably. It made me laugh that a car from the 90s performed so much better than a 'new' car (at the time). I was pretty happy when i sold that Mustang.
Pussy
Lol go get your rice jdm junk the 3000 gt vr4 0-60 was 5.4 about the same than these, I absolutely love my 09 GT /CS is fast enough and it feel right with no less power, there’s nothing whatsoever boring on driving them, And comparing to new muscle cars with a lot more power feels and runs about as fast , the 3V is still a dream to drive. You’re comparing apples to oranges, the 3000 gt was turbocharged to obtain such power and the Mustang from that era was no sports car...
I laugh going like in a limo going 140 mph safe and comfortable in my Mustang all day long
@@gorgeusjames
czcams.com/video/fwps3TVcJMM/video.html
czcams.com/video/ukVsqR66ldE/video.html
*Those links alone show you how much faster the VR-4 is than the shitty 05-09 300hp Mustang GT* and no there isn't a difference between the US model and the JDM model. 05-09 GTs are by far the dogs of the Mustang family. Heat soak city and a V8 with only 300hp and a 5 speed. Maybe you could beat a 300ZX TT...I owned both dumbass. The VR-4 is MARKEDLY faster than any Mustang besides the 2013 models.
Try 0-60 in 4.8 and the 1/4m in 13.4-13.6@101-105mph bone stock in magazines and 13.1-13.3 with owners that can launch it - czcams.com/video/vFEYkgOZdC4/video.html - 13.2@102.7mph bone stock.
czcams.com/video/kBTwc8h-cnI/video.html - 1994 VR4 0-60 4.9, 1/4m 13.5@103mph. And they didn't even launch it correctly.
www.motortrend.com/news/virtual-velocity/ - 1/4m 13.5@101.6, again with a bad driver.
www.motortrend.com/news/mitsubishi-3000gt-vr4/ - 0-60 in 4.8, 1/4m 13.6.
*Show me a stock mag time of an 05-09 Mustang GT doing 60mph in 4.8 seconds and the 1/4m in 13.2@102.7...oh wait, you can't...the 05-09 Mustang GT hits 60 in 5.1 and the 1/4 in 13.8-13.9@100-104mph, both times are slower than the VR-4.
If you want more proof, I can get it for you. You sound like an idiot muscle head. Go drive your bucket LT1 lmao
@@gorgeusjames Yeah sure kid. I highly doubt you've gone over 120mph. 4th gear in that car is geared worse than the VR4 (which has a 6 speed) and God forbid it's hot out, your bucket Mustang will lose 20hp *easy* I've Never owned a car that heat soaked as bad as that shit Mustang.
It's somewhat fun to drive, I'll give you that. I even listed cars I beat. But grow up. The VR-4 was a $60k car, that ratty Mustang GT was $25k. Those cars aren't even in the same class. I smoked a 2011 Mustang GT from 20-120mph by half a car until he let off