Who pinched Paul Keating's Acme Fightback!? (1995)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 21. 03. 2021
  • Someone has stolen "Acme Fightback!" from the Prime Minister's drawer.
    Paul's answer to Shadow Treasurer Peter Costello's question also goes to the veracity of election commitments and funding for labour market programs.
    Skip to:
    0:00 Peter Costello's question
    0:39 Paul Keating on the veracity of tax cuts
    3:57 Ronald Biggs revisited
    4:47 “Someone's lifted Acme from the drawer”
    5:33 “The Lords Haw-Haw”
    6:07 The National Gallery's loss
    6:25 Acme Fightback and labour market programs

Komentáře • 43

  • @redundantideas
    @redundantideas Před 3 lety +36

    Meanwhile, a year later, Costello took about $8b out instead. What outrage! Absolutely disgraceful.

    • @JemClarke
      @JemClarke  Před 3 lety +12

      Hypocrisy doesn't faze their side of politics, does it?

    • @user-cg7uv3mh9f
      @user-cg7uv3mh9f Před 3 lety +4

      @@JemClarke no, because the ends justify the means.

    • @tonyparangi7397
      @tonyparangi7397 Před 3 lety +1

      @@user-cg7uv3mh9f And the mean (Libs) justifies the end.

    • @sanchezVeringz
      @sanchezVeringz Před 4 měsíci

      @@JemClarke Costello, was small-time, a red supporter originally, like fats Hockey, Nelson, Turnbull & our idiotic friend Costello.

  • @leisureenjoyer1986
    @leisureenjoyer1986 Před 3 lety +25

    keating is a comic and intellectual giant

  • @andrewwilliams8986
    @andrewwilliams8986 Před 3 lety +17

    Costello, “work till you drop.” Zero credibility if considering the health and happiness of the Australian people.

  • @davidjefferson9327
    @davidjefferson9327 Před 3 lety +13

    Bring on paul keating 2 he was the best

    • @fatShowPony
      @fatShowPony Před rokem

      9% unemployment, gold standard economic stewardship

    • @JemClarke
      @JemClarke  Před 11 měsíci +1

      @@fatShowPony Howard's recession inflicted double-digit unemployment, double-digit inflation and 20-odd percent interest rates, and his didn't leave decades of prosperity in its wake. The Liberals and Nationals didn't have the wit or the balls to restructure the place. That job fell to Labor and treasurer Keating.

  • @bravelyHomoSapien
    @bravelyHomoSapien Před 3 lety +13

    PJK is an absolute genius

  • @calinmarian98
    @calinmarian98 Před 3 lety +8

    One question : If Howard retired after the 2004 election,would Costello lose that badly like they lost to Rudd in 2007?

    • @JemClarke
      @JemClarke  Před 3 lety

      Interesting question...

    • @vinnyd91
      @vinnyd91 Před 3 lety +2

      Howard's longevity was only one of the factors that brought the Liberal government down in 2007. There were multiple other factors that Labor used to promote their policy platform, including the abolition of Work Choices, signing the Kyoto Protocol, and the apology to the Stolen Generations. Whether or not you agree with these policies, Labor successfully used them to highlight their progressive action and the Coalition's reluctance.
      Peter Costello might have been able to stem the losses the Coalition experienced in 2007, but I don't know if he would have been able to spin his way out of a Coalition loss. But who knows?

    • @SSMMTTEE
      @SSMMTTEE Před 3 lety +2

      I still think the "It's Time" factor would have done for the Coalition at the 2007 election. It's also worth remembering just how presidential Labor's campaign was in 2007, with Rudd presented by them not just as a capable and likeable leader, but as quite a conservative Labor figure (the whole "I'm from Queensland and I'm here to help" and him saying in his election launch speech "I am an economic conservative" and so on).
      Having said that, one of the biggest factors in the Coalition's defeat was undoubtedly the confusion over leadership. Having reneged on his pledge to handover to Costello, and then the embarrassment of the APEC situation in 2007 when this was all brought up again, Howard basically went into November 2007 saying "elect me as Prime Minister and I'll hand over to Costello in a few months anyway". This was a terrible strategy and played right into Labor's hands, who were able to project themselves as the party of leadership stability (how ironic given how it all turned out!).
      Then again, many people thought Labor were doomed ahead of 1993 regardless of who was leader, but after Labor switched from Hawke to Keating, they went on and won a fifth election victory. Could the same have happened for Costello? I think another real "what if" question is would Labor have been moved to change leader in 2006 if Costello had taken over? Would Beazley have been seen as a safer pair of hands to take him on? Who knows...

    • @calinmarian98
      @calinmarian98 Před 3 lety +3

      @@SSMMTTEE I asked because Costello was always the loyal number two,never challenging Howard. And after they lost,he just vanished.

    • @SSMMTTEE
      @SSMMTTEE Před 3 lety +1

      @@calinmarian98 Indeed, although Costello certainly tried to roll Howard, he just could never get the support to make it happen, and wasn’t stupid enough to blow up the Government in trying. Howard told him privately in 1995 that he’d make way for him after a few years, but of course as we know he had absolutely no intention of doing that! Howard’s autobiography was pretty brutal on poor old Peter.
      The bigger surprise is as you say that he just disappeared after 2007. I think it was two things - one, he’d been in the game so long by then that he decided it wasn’t worth it anymore, and he could earn a tonne of money, and two - he thought Labor would be in for at least three terms, minimum. If you’d told him it would just be six years I think he’d have stayed, but at that time Rudd looked invincible and Labor were set to dominate for a decade. Funny how things work out isn’t it!!

  • @danielhedger5904
    @danielhedger5904 Před 3 lety +9

    I really hope that the ALP win the 2022 election

    • @Toothily
      @Toothily Před 2 lety +6

      I’m from the future and yes they do ;p

  • @Lobo-ih3bh
    @Lobo-ih3bh Před 11 měsíci +4

    Al tip, no iceberg Costello. Never had the ticker for leadership.

    • @dratz50
      @dratz50 Před 10 měsíci +2

      The low altitude flyer?

    • @Lobo-ih3bh
      @Lobo-ih3bh Před 10 měsíci

      @@dratz50 yep, that's our boy ' the talking knee'

  • @user-gc9nj3do2z
    @user-gc9nj3do2z Před 5 měsíci

    10years into that prick, and a hell of a lot a cutdown and therapy for me??

  • @slipnslide9308
    @slipnslide9308 Před 3 lety +1

    Why didn’t he tell the Australian people he was gay.

    • @tonyparangi7397
      @tonyparangi7397 Před 3 lety +10

      Coz he didn't want to give you up.

    • @butterbread858
      @butterbread858 Před rokem +1

      Is there any base to this statement?

    • @dratz50
      @dratz50 Před 10 měsíci

      @@butterbread858 Of course not. It's called projction, isn't it @slipnslide9308

    • @nudibanches
      @nudibanches Před 9 měsíci

      @@butterbread858it’s completely base (less). Typical attempt by a brain dead numpty to discredit someone. Can’t attack their intellect or record? Try their sexuality and hope for the best.

    • @chriswilkins2643
      @chriswilkins2643 Před 8 měsíci

      @@butterbread858 He knew he was going to be a PM ,so a wife and kids he took on, After the roll as PM he was free to be what he wants to be,,,and he pulled it off very well I would say . Who would of voted for him if they knew he was a horse hoof in those times