Is Your Trickster Function a Master? | EgoHackers

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 21. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 26

  • @Zpaaztyk
    @Zpaaztyk Před 7 měsíci +11

    8:50
    Begins on Extraverted Sensing Trickster to Master.
    Uses Introverted Sensing icon.
    Se Trickery archetype at its finest.
    Love your work, i just found that funny.
    Edit: To follow this up i commented immediately after seeing that, and then you proceeded to correct yourself 15 seconds later.
    Example of Se Hero getting humbled.

    • @gooddaygene8355
      @gooddaygene8355 Před 7 měsíci

      I was gonna mention it as well, but my Se parent waited.

  • @camrywingler1013
    @camrywingler1013 Před měsícem

    Yep. I definitely have Se trickster. I thought I was an INFP, but no. I’m an INTP.

  • @hadiza1
    @hadiza1 Před 24 dny

    💜

  • @YouilAushana
    @YouilAushana Před 3 měsíci

    3:00 don't use knowledge to impress people but the gut is usually on point and I don't want to give it away

  • @jbrendel98
    @jbrendel98 Před 6 měsíci +1

    Wait is this the same guy from CS Joseph's channel? No wonder all this info is the same

    • @EgoHackers
      @EgoHackers  Před 6 měsíci +1

      Yes. More summarized and sharable though.

  • @mihaisigma4987
    @mihaisigma4987 Před 4 měsíci

    Ne trickster imagine developing that

  • @shawndouglas9605
    @shawndouglas9605 Před 7 měsíci +1

    2:19 Te Trickster to Master

  • @hadiza1
    @hadiza1 Před 7 měsíci +1

    💙🖤💙

  • @jks234
    @jks234 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Sounds to me like mastery of the trickster is to basically discard and doubt the initial impression of this function and look at it again objectively.
    Look around the function, almost.
    My initial reaction to Se as an INTP is not right. It is just my INTP impression.
    I need to look around my impression and see everything around it. What influences do I see Se making in the world?

  • @niekreatywny3208
    @niekreatywny3208 Před 7 měsíci +3

    Im pretty interested why Entp or Estp would want to develop Fi trickster. If its about morals, we think that anything can be good or bad but we know that in our culture that is system there are rules for good and bad things (Fe). So we can choose when we want to breake or not those rules. I dont feel like im really lacking morals and i should have them to be full, i just don't look at world this way and its great in whatever goal im trying to get.

    • @ninjapandathethird6241
      @ninjapandathethird6241 Před 7 měsíci

    • @imjustapenguinguys
      @imjustapenguinguys Před 7 měsíci +2

      Extp's parent Ti is like their speciality, the quality which makes them stand out from rest more than their other functions. Usually people take pride in their parent functions and strongly emphasize them. If you manage unify Ti - Fi, you become a whole unit(You way of life utterly depends on you), other people can't make you feel bad for what you've done because you can choose how you feel for yourself. In other words you can finally be free in decision making. You can abuse your chosen person, if that's what you'd like to do and feel okey/loved about it despite if others hate you for it. After all if life is meant for enjoying yourself, you're free to do whatever you want, there're only consequences for it though. Otherwise there wouldn't be programmed desire in us.

  • @Heyokasireniei468sxso
    @Heyokasireniei468sxso Před 7 měsíci +2

    Te has nothing to do with other people thoughts Ni is not about wanting things why are you so scared to read carl jung psychological types read the book you got non of that information from carl jung

    • @BobbyTheKid21
      @BobbyTheKid21 Před 7 měsíci +8

      "The guy who started this science didn't say it, so it must not be true!"

    • @gooddaygene8355
      @gooddaygene8355 Před 7 měsíci +1

      Indeed. Jung did uncover something massive when it came to the cognitive functions. He started the "relay race." Yet, he himself was limited to what he uncovered, especially because he was approaching his interpretations of the functions from his own cognitive stack.

    • @Heyokasireniei468sxso
      @Heyokasireniei468sxso Před 7 měsíci

      @@BobbyTheKid21 pretty much means your making up what you want and have no phd to back it up

    • @RonFlux
      @RonFlux Před 7 měsíci +16

      If you read psychological types, then you would see that his Te descriptions refer to an objective orientation, German citation, p. 371 "seine gesamte Lebensäußerung in die Abhängigkeit von intellektuellen Schlüssen zu bringen, die sich in letzter Linie stets am objektiv Gegebenen, entweder an objektiven Tatsachen oder allgemein gültigen Ideen orientieren" . Translated in short form, it means "an orientation to objective facts and general ideas". Object in Carl Jungs definitions refers to an outside orientation (extraversion). As he is talking about thinking, it is an orientation towards others' thinking. So not necessarily their thoughts, but the general thought system expected from the Te user by society.
      The same for Ni, German citation, p. 430 "Sein Urteil läßt ihn, allerdings öfters nur dämmerhaft, erkennen, daß er als Mensch, als Ganzes irgendwie in seine Vision einbezogen ist, daß sie etwas ist, das nicht bloß angeschaut werden kann, sondern auch zum Leben des Subjektes werde möchte." Here Carl Jung tells us that the Ni user is actually influenced by their vision to bring their vision to life. This means the vision reflects a goal they are driven by which results in "wanting" to achieve it. So I see nothing wrong with calling it a "want", it is a strong part of introverted intuition.

    • @Heyokasireniei468sxso
      @Heyokasireniei468sxso Před 7 měsíci

      @@RonFlux no