Tracy Austin On The Wimbledon Triumphs For Carlos Alcaraz and Barbora Krejčíková | Inside-In Podcast
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- Tracy Austin returns to the show to recap the 2024 Wimbledon Championships. Austin breaks down how Barbora Krejčíková went on the run of a lifetime in London, etching her name in the history books as champion at the All England Club. The two-time US Open champ also explains how Krejčíková along with Wimbledon finalist Jasmine Paolini and several others on the WTA are hitting their stride later in their careers.
The TC commentator also analyzes how Carlos Alcaraz was able to defend his crown in London with a straight sets victory over Novak Djokovic, and forcasts what the future will look like for both men. The youngest inductee in the history of the International Tennis Hall of Fame also previews what to expect at this weekend's induction ceremony, and how 22-time major champion Rafael Nadal has looked in his return to action. Hosted by Mitch Michals.
You can listen to this episode on all of your favorite podcast platforms by clicking on this link: link.chtbl.com...
Novak was very lucky to get to the final. He had such an easy path... playing only #15 and #25 to get to the final.
His performance in the final - showed how lucky he was to be there.
Wonderful interview Mitch with such a great champion in Tracy. I love her analysis.
Muchas gracias por el análisis. Lo de Carlos con la hierba ha sido como el mismo ha dicho un enamoramiento instantáneo . Saludos.
Wimbledon maintains its historic reputation in large part b/c it allows meagre advertising/marketing. (Granted, costs are passed along but this isn't unique to Wimbledon.)
It would only be respectful to say someone’s (family) name, as it’s pronounced. Simple things yet to learn.
That sounds really unnecessary, to have the director of the cameras talking in your ear the whole time, while you're trying to call a match!
What a player. ❤
the Australians won 10 more points 🤯
Can you guys stop with this dumb Margaret Court record? Why was no one talking about Court when Steffi was at the top with 22? What changed ? 😏
They did talk about Court record during the Roland Garros final of 1999 on NBC with Bud Collins. Also the Wimbledon final of 1999
same bs they did to Serena and made her collapse in finals after pregnancy
@@MrBjorn6 It is dumb. About 6 or 7 of her pre-Open era titles are literally country club tennis titles. She was playing a field of less than 20 athletes, mostly Aussies and 3 to 4 Brazilians. How is this "accomplishment" equivalent to an open era title? It is a joke. I cannot take any tennis "journalist" seriously when they keep peddling this "record." Djokovic already has the men's slam record at 24 and Serena has the women's record at 23. Open era record is the record that matters.
@@backto-il9ne We aren't debating whether or not Court record is equivalent to Graf, Serena Williams or Novak. But I hate when people lie 🤥 and say courts record was bought up to undermine Serena Williams or Novak Djokovic. Because that's is a lie 🤥. I remember Bud Collins talking about Court, Helen wills Moody, when Chris Evert got to 17 majors at the Roland Garros final in 1985 on NBC. I just don't like the Serena stans and Novak stans lying 🤥 saying that Court record was bought up only to undermine their accomplishments. During Roland Garros 1999 and Wimbledon 1999 NBC and Bud Collins showed the record as all era Court 24, Graf 21 , Helen wills Moody 19. Those are the facts.
@@MrBjorn6 You only mentioned a few sparse random examples. I've been watching all the slams religiously since 2000 and Court's 24 was never mentioned until Serena started zeroing in on Graf. Graf's 22 was ALWAYS the benchmark. Always. All conversations about slam counts almost always focused on the open era record and the few times Court was mentioned, the pre-open era asterisk was mentioned. She was NEVER the benchmark. Graf was. And these are the facts !!!