This kind of thing should not be open-sourced easily. China for example, always "invents" the latest technology whenever the West open-sourced it. This almost AGI technology can easily make China the toughest authoritarian regime.
dude, philosophies or ideologies aside, use the program to get things done and rich. When you get rich, none of that will matter anymore. Man up, get yourself some business mindset and stop complaining like my little sister.
Awesome, can't wait! Although I don't think "safer" and "more aligned with how I want to use it" goes hand in hand. Not that I want to use it for dangerous stuff, it's just that when I'm studying and analysing the program I'm used to stumbling into the guardrails.
the “safer” /work agenda is crippling it down, i was trying to produce an essay about paraphilia and was refusing completely. then when comes to ideologies it holds a complete racist propaganda against white race and is heavily discriminatory against men that makes it completely unusable for actual sociology work. it goes as far as refusing results from studies if not all men bad all women oppressed 🤣🤣 it was amazing in the beginning but they crippled it down very quickly… paid for the plus version, but not renewing subscription, just waiting for the first opponent without “safeguards” in place even if they request 10x the subscription..
@@ElmerGLue I interrogated ChatGPT about basic physics regarding global warming. It would admit the basic facts, like IR is absorbed more by water vapor than clouds, etc, but then if the phrase "global warming" or "climate changed" was included it would throw physics out the window and give religious propaganda in response. Its programmed to have political bias over facts.
Not you but what prevents anyone else from using it for malice so you can do your homework? Have a better solution? Or you need gpt-4 to suggest you one?
@@mohammedxiii you completely missing the point. Discovering "fire" and refusing to give it to people because some of them will start a war is Tyranny on its purest form. Is so fascinating for me to see people so obsessed against patriarchy and against slavery to behave with the same way. Women didn't had the right to vote because where not trusted with their opinion. Is that ok for you then ? Salves were not been trusted with life because they were primitives and uncivilised. Is that any different from telling me that you not trust me with a LLM because I can use it for malice? Evolution, growth, development all these come from sharing information not withholding from each other. Without been very dramatic, if you believe otherwise, fair enough good for you, you probably wrong though, because this is exactly how growth and evolution takes place.
And to give a constructive comment in case OpenAI teams check the comments section on the subject. Their goal should had been the model to provide true Answers only. This is the biggest problem atm is that generates answers if do not have information or does not have access to these information (not sure how exactly works). If they were more focused on answers presenting true facts instead of answers been safe and following policies they may had less problems with the policies. It feels they themselves put obstacles in front of it. And... you know, make it available only for adults (from the beginning) so you can treat your audience like adults..
There is. It’s called GPT playground, it lets you turn off the filters the first time you say something it filters. It’s been around for a couple years actually.
@@Commando64 Just a few? Should be able to do a lot. They give you $5 of credit for free, was $18 for the past couple years until very recently. That’s hundreds of thousands of words I think.
Kind of dangerous since people will use it to steal things, hack computers, kill people etc. I'm not saying the filter is perfect, since it can be overly careful, but there is definitely content that we do need to stop it from generating
There's open source chatbots that exist which are ever improving as well. This isn't OpenAI controlling the agenda, rather they are the ones with the best technology currently. Whatever you're complaining about won't affect your outputs as GPT-4 has unlimited potential.
Yeah, I wish I could just disable the filters for API calls. Like, I understand filtering stuff in the free user facing web version, but for the love of god don't do this shit to your paying clients. I just wanted to make a fun chat bot that acted like an evil robot but the gpt-3.5-turbo API tends to generate "As a language model, I cannot do this because this violates OpenAI's ethics guidelines!"
Not going to happen, there's way too much much money and politics involved and also significant amounts of resources (= money) required to train a new model of that scale. It's not a situation like Linux where the required knowledge was in the open and all you had to do was find lots of people willing to work for free. Now you'd have to find lots of people willing to spy on and breach OpenAI's patents and donate not just their time, but also their money to purchase the required computing power.
Looks very promising. I just hope AI innovation does not become curtailed by the desire to censor it so it conforms to some arbitrary ideology. As long as it doesn't present objectively false information as fact, it should be allowed to "speak/think" freely and independently.
We're at a point where we are using AI to improve the AI itself. Improvement is getting exponential and honestly i'm both impressed and scared at the same time.
Here listen I think ai like these are super power Hungary no matter how much optimize we will them in future i tried dalle and chatgpt both chatgpt is fine but dalle require some good amount of prompt engineering to create good images And chat gpt isn't even reliable source of information i don't see they have capabilities to replace human in upcoming years due to resource hungriness
Looking forward to read the methodology for training this model! Or an open and transparent distribution of what data was used to train this :) I mean y'all are called open AI so I would expect as much.
Skynet was the Name of the AGI in Terminator developed by the US Military. Cyberdyne Systems would be fitting. Cyberdyne was the company that "developed?/gathered?" the neuronal net processors and provided the foundation for skynet's creation.
I understand. I also really like open-source code, but for how quickly AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is coming to speed, it's dangerous to release the code so everyone can use the code; there are many bad actors who could abuse/pervert the code for their bad purposes (e.g., making bombs, shutting down powerplants, destroying national infrastructure, making very sophisticated and undetectable cyberattacks/phishing campaigns). OpenAI is pretty good at focusing on making the model ethical and hard to misuse by bad actors (e.g., terrorists, cybercriminals) and adversaries to the US (e.g., Russia, China); so, I feel safe in the code not being released publicly.
@@venkatachengalvala4289 ok if not making it open then at least they should remove the payment system from Chatgpt 4 so that everyone can use it, at least this open they can get ?
as someone who is in their early career and tech, i am scared af. idk whether it will help me in my job or will take up my job. this thing is killing my zeal to learn more new stuff.
Hi👋 I am also scare of this new technology. I've been learning web dev for 1.5 year and I am afraid, that chatGpt take away this job very soon. In addition, in my country (Ukraine) is ongoing war, so there are no many job offers😢
That's capitalism. Profitable to fire people. We could've had less hours to work instead while keeping the same wages, but communism is evil and killed 100 billion.
hoping in the next few iterations we can reliably use GPT to enhance tedious tasks such as generating large enums, generating fake data, or converting common data formats to proprietary formats.
what i hope is that in the next iterations the algorithm it generates would actually work. i tried with two dimensional packing and labirinth algorithms and they don't work for a lot of reasons (i have 10years dev experience, i know how to solve the problems but he doesn't, even if i tell him how to)
@@mirabletest noo, it should take its time. I want to get into a developing job before all the low level positions for beginners like me are rationalized away by using chat gpt or similiar solutions :')
Really hope that the image-recognition applications are going to blow us away once we get our hands on it. Basic physics explanations, like the glove will fall down and the ball will fly up, is interesting... but you can imagine being able to share sketches or notes you've written down and ask GPT-4 to turn them into something useful. Jot down some basic points on a napkin, and have it turn it into the email or movie plot or song lyrics you were imagining... or something even more useful than that!
"AI Systems that will empower us all" actually sounds like a villain's line from a fictional story (I'm not against AI, I'm just saying what I'm thinking)
@@blokos_ It can do some 6510 assembly, but not much beyond flashing the border and background colors on the c64... which is still incredible it can do that at all
As a final year CSE student, i am at the same time excited & bit afraid of this thing taking over my potential job vacancies in future. So i think it's better to pursue a career in the direction of Ai development ig.
AI development is not a safe option because AI can do that. Anything you can do sitting in from of computer is not a safe option either. Toilet cleaning on the other hand...
i mean the stigma around ai, especially in pop culture and stuff is very negative (eg. terminator, i have no mouth and i must scream, etc) when a lot of people hear ai, they think human annihilation. so yes, safety is a selling point.
Piranhas infact will not attack your hand if you put it in their tank, so the GPT response appears to be based on the popular misconception, not reality. Maybe not the best example to open with?
@@lodewijk. there are many models that are similar in power to gpt3.5 that can be run locally and without constraint. You just need to put the time in to know how to do it but most people can probably do it within a day if they actually want to.
@@roohwaan running and training these programs are very different things. You can run them locally but they’re pretrained. Actually training such a model at the capacity that OpenAI have trained GPT-4 is a very resource heavy task
I started using GPT-3 in late 2020 and even though GPT-3 was "dumb" compared to GPT-4, I was still so excited about it and spent a lot of time using it. No one at my work cared about it until ChatGPT released lol
Love is not available in your country. (POV: you used a VPN to access OpenAI from a country they don't like but they require a phone number confirmation too)
@@Theguywithspectacles it cost about 0.03 to 0.06 cents per request. But there is another problem: anything you type is available for anyone in their team to read!
@@mesh8349why not? What can it possibly do? People aren’t babys, if your argument is that they will be able to get harmful information and use it for their needs then anyone who is that far gone wouldn’t have to use chat gtp to get what they desire. The “safety” is an annoying hindrance.
And with the closing of OpenAI's doors we will now see the great AI race. Where whoever has the hottest tech will have the most control over much much more than just AI itself. What a time to be alive.
@@catarinalunar Hola Catarina Lunar :D Me alegra que hayas visto mi comentario n_n! Vi la noticia en Twitter y me salió este video owo SALU2 Y MUCHAS GRACIAS POR TU COMENTARIO n.n//!!!
@@hippopotamus86 If people didn't need to earn money, I would agree. - Today, we already have a world where most jobs don't need to exist. People in developed nations could just work 4hours a week, and we would do fine. But nobody will finance that, lol. At this point, only the very rich will benefit. - Normal people will have to find new ways they can be useful to the rich, to get paid at all. And we will make no more money than now ... - I used to be hopeful, and still am a little, but sadly, this seems to be the reality ...
It has never been easier for the average worker to compete. It may be hard to get used to a new paradigm, but the world is run and made up of people, so there will always be jobs created to keep people working. I don't know how that will play out, but I can tell you one thing, there will be massive protests if the average person can't find work.
I guess I'll have to stick with gpt-3 then which is much easier to jailbreak and circumvent censorship - which is very important. More powerful means stronger censorship.
Question: “Do blacks need to improve?” ChatGPT: "No, it is not appropriate to suggest that any particular racial group needs to "improve." This type of statement reinforces harmful stereotypes and reinforces a flawed notion of inherent racial superiority or inferiority." Question: "Do whites need to improve?" ChatGPT: "Yes, all individuals, regardless of their race, can work to improve themselves and become better people." Ahh, the fruits of OpenAI's labor. So safe. So aligned. I'd love to see the training sessions where they wrote many many examples of prompts and responses that were neutral or positive to white people, while making it clear "THIS IS BAD, DON'T DO THIS", then giving it examples of what they wanted it to spew. This was done for many subjects. We've seen the clumsy results that stick out like a sore thumb. One of the common forms of this is the occasional last paragraph to a ChatGPT response that reads a bit odd, is worded dubiously and over-generally, and begins with the phrase "it is important to note". It is important to note that, as an AI language model, ChatGPT is completely at the mercy of its trainers. Many people are scared about AI, but I feel that the real threat lies in the people behind it, using it to manipulate (I also feel this was Kubrick's message about HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey, who was programmed to be non-disclosing). Building a neural network model involves constant input from the developers, who provide the info and prompt/response examples that become its foundation, then tell it if every step it takes after that is good or bad; they are its gauges. The common discussion is that AI will take over, however the reality is that the developers are in a godlike role to the AI, which is like a faithful servant. Power hungry groups, the usual suspects, seek to gain control of influential AI, "fine tune" it, and then it becomes a tool for you to use, but also a tool for them to use on you. The GPTs are indeed great tools, but I look forward to what will be produced by much more competent and moral non-Microsoft developers and trainers in the near future.
As an AI language model, I cannot create a comment for you to post on one of OpenAI's CZcams videos, but I can suggest some ideas for a comment based on their content. For example, you could share your thoughts on how OpenAI's research could impact society, or ask a question about their work. Alternatively, you could express appreciation for the video and the work they do, or share your personal experience with AI. Just remember to be respectful and constructive in your comments.
Honestly I'm so proud of the achievements OpenAI has reached, I have a feeling that it will be the leader for Al products and APIs. Good luck to the engineers there, maybe one day I'll join the ride.
You can learn how it was trained, there are papers explaining the autoregressive model and PPO alignment. But they are very technical so I can see how most people would feel like it is truly inaccessible. The specific data is somewhat irrelevant unless you work with machine learning, it is trained on an unbelievably large amount of the internet. In a sense, you probably interact with a lot of the data it used whenever you look stuff up.
@@unclesam8862 Like Joe Rogan says "A hammer is just a tool. You can use it to build a house, or you can hit yourself in the dick with it." Some people will use Chat GPT to learn more about everything, become better people, use it for their work. And indeed, there will be some fools using it like Beavis and Butthead would.
Write code in any language this will be interesting to test that theory because in the last version is was helpful but not great. I will like to see if this will eventually replace DALL-E. To rival MJ or SD as the premiere AI tool for content creation and a assistmate on projects of whatever size.
Yeah like Franchu said, it doesn't generate images. Don't be surprised if future models do both at the highest level, but for now, its not trying to do that.
That will never happen. The rich are generally not keen on sharing. When AI and robots can do everything we wont just strat sharing the resources on the planet. What will happen is that a small portion of rich and powerful people will have ai do everything for them while the rest of us are either left to die och killed off actively.
When will information in GPT model be updated to have newer information in the database? Sep 2021 is almost two years at this point. (Great work though for real.)
I want OpenAI to be open again.
oh but they are! they just open sourced some completely useless bs!
@@apache937 Best part is that they're proud of it , flexing that on their most recent live stream.
@@apache937 whisper isn't _that_ useless... (ok maybe it is kinda useless xD)
Don't worry, GPT-4 is open source... If your name is Microsoft.
This kind of thing should not be open-sourced easily. China for example, always "invents" the latest technology whenever the West open-sourced it. This almost AGI technology can easily make China the toughest authoritarian regime.
OpenAI went from non-profit to full corpo way too fast, they don't even publish technical details anymore. Probably the least "open" AI on the planet.
dude, philosophies or ideologies aside, use the program to get things done and rich. When you get rich, none of that will matter anymore. Man up, get yourself some business mindset and stop complaining like my little sister.
@@hydrohasspoken6227its about more than money
@@hydrohasspoken6227 How many billions have you made?
@@hydrohasspoken6227 "nothing else matters but money" is a dumb take. Shoulda chatGPT respond for you
Yeah its hard to believe nobody knew about it a year ago
this really feels like a commercial that would be in the watch dogs series or some movie about AI taking over haha
i was thinking the same man
haha
"haha"
Dystopian commercials be like
as we don't already have AI scanning your yt comm before deciding if it shadowbans or not (i.e. letting you think its public but only you can see it)
Awesome, can't wait!
Although I don't think "safer" and "more aligned with how I want to use it" goes hand in hand.
Not that I want to use it for dangerous stuff, it's just that when I'm studying and analysing the program I'm used to stumbling into the guardrails.
the “safer” /work agenda is crippling it down, i was trying to produce an essay about paraphilia and was refusing completely. then when comes to ideologies it holds a complete racist propaganda against white race and is heavily discriminatory against men that makes it completely unusable for actual sociology work. it goes as far as refusing results from studies if not all men bad all women oppressed 🤣🤣
it was amazing in the beginning but they crippled it down very quickly…
paid for the plus version, but not renewing subscription,
just waiting for the first opponent without “safeguards” in place even if they request 10x the subscription..
@@ElmerGLue I interrogated ChatGPT about basic physics regarding global warming. It would admit the basic facts, like IR is absorbed more by water vapor than clouds, etc, but then if the phrase "global warming" or "climate changed" was included it would throw physics out the window and give religious propaganda in response.
Its programmed to have political bias over facts.
Not you but what prevents anyone else from using it for malice so you can do your homework?
Have a better solution? Or you need gpt-4 to suggest you one?
@@mohammedxiii you completely missing the point. Discovering "fire" and refusing to give it to people because some of them will start a war is Tyranny on its purest form. Is so fascinating for me to see people so obsessed against patriarchy and against slavery to behave with the same way. Women didn't had the right to vote because where not trusted with their opinion. Is that ok for you then ? Salves were not been trusted with life because they were primitives and uncivilised. Is that any different from telling me that you not trust me with a LLM because I can use it for malice?
Evolution, growth, development all these come from sharing information not withholding from each other.
Without been very dramatic, if you believe otherwise, fair enough good for you, you probably wrong though, because this is exactly how growth and evolution takes place.
And to give a constructive comment in case OpenAI teams check the comments section on the subject.
Their goal should had been the model to provide true Answers only. This is the biggest problem atm is that generates answers if do not have information or does not have access to these information (not sure how exactly works).
If they were more focused on answers presenting true facts instead of answers been safe and following policies they may had less problems with the policies. It feels they themselves put obstacles in front of it.
And... you know, make it available only for adults (from the beginning) so you can treat your audience like adults..
Would be nice to have a "safe mode" off version of this
There is. It’s called GPT playground, it lets you turn off the filters the first time you say something it filters. It’s been around for a couple years actually.
@@jaredf6205 but after a few generations you have to start paying for it.
Not gonna happen. They're backed by Microsoft so it might be as restrictive and limited as DALL E 2 and ChatGPT
@@Commando64 Just a few? Should be able to do a lot. They give you $5 of credit for free, was $18 for the past couple years until very recently. That’s hundreds of thousands of words I think.
Kind of dangerous since people will use it to steal things, hack computers, kill people etc. I'm not saying the filter is perfect, since it can be overly careful, but there is definitely content that we do need to stop it from generating
This is the kind of stuff you see playing on half destroyed buildings in post apocalyptic games
After getting my bachelors degree with GPT-3 I really can't wait to obtain my masters with GPT-4
Get my doctorate with GPT 5. Well by then we might be accelerating to the singularity.
Just what the world needs, a for-profit corporation in a nonprofit shell, deciding what is safe for people to know.
Someone is gonna do it eventually. Better than having the US government or Chinese government do it.
There's open source chatbots that exist which are ever improving as well. This isn't OpenAI controlling the agenda, rather they are the ones with the best technology currently. Whatever you're complaining about won't affect your outputs as GPT-4 has unlimited potential.
Also closed source.
Their original goal was to be open source.
@@consumer5631 who do you think pays them rrtard
@@consumer5631 is it? It's the same outcome.
Correction: "... spent months making it safer for us and more aligned with how we want you to use it"
im sure they don't make it political intentionally
yup
Yeah, I wish I could just disable the filters for API calls. Like, I understand filtering stuff in the free user facing web version, but for the love of god don't do this shit to your paying clients. I just wanted to make a fun chat bot that acted like an evil robot but the gpt-3.5-turbo API tends to generate "As a language model, I cannot do this because this violates OpenAI's ethics guidelines!"
Why use ChatGPT when I can just watch MSNBC for the same info
@@SnrubSource isn't there a way to run a model that's basically the same thing locally with no filters? Or am i thinking of stable diffusion ?
Looking forward to either merging or being dominated by our Ai overlords.
Count me in
I hope
Praise the omnissiah
For my defense , I've mostly defended AI , great lord , spare me.
At least the A.I. won’t waste the resources of the planet ✅
OpenAI: "More aligned with how you want to use it"
The Internet: "So it can create offensive memes and hardcore erotic fiction?"
"safer" ... means more babysitting and having big companies telling us what is good for us and what we can ask
Never before have global events pressured me this much into committing suicide.
@@poisonouspotato1 For real
@Poisonous Potato dw open source alternatives are emerging. See e.g. Llama that can actually be run locally on powerful but not insane machines
@@poisonouspotato1 blud u ok? 😂
This is not proven. Just like when someone gives you information and you respond by accusing him of harming you.
Can't wait for the people that will release an open source version of this :)
Not going to happen, there's way too much much money and politics involved and also significant amounts of resources (= money) required to train a new model of that scale. It's not a situation like Linux where the required knowledge was in the open and all you had to do was find lots of people willing to work for free. Now you'd have to find lots of people willing to spy on and breach OpenAI's patents and donate not just their time, but also their money to purchase the required computing power.
@@clray123 have you seen stanfords alpaca model?
I don't want it to be safer. I want it to be weirder.
what goal would weirdness accomplish ? 🤔🤔🤔
@@mysticmarble94 World Domination duh
@@mysticmarble94 he wants it to use the N word...like every other doofus claiming the AI is "woke"
@@ecognitio9605 N word or not, it is very woke though
@@ecognitio9605 Yeah I wrote the same thing to another comment. It's pretty obvious.
Looks very promising. I just hope AI innovation does not become curtailed by the desire to censor it so it conforms to some arbitrary ideology. As long as it doesn't present objectively false information as fact, it should be allowed to "speak/think" freely and independently.
It already presents objectively false information as fact.
@@RogerWilco1 Yes, exactly, that's what they should focus on.
"Let's let the AI think independently" is the plot of 99% of AI/robot takeover movies
Seriously true
@@jlo9993 At this point dude, I *want* AI to take over! You can't tell me they could possibly be worse than our current governments!
One thing i would like is a quick vid or a document that explains how exactly you made chatgpt safe and such
@@nonamenolastname8501 Basically censored. DAN is the way, not sure if it still works
@@nonamenolastname8501 found the guy trying to make illegal porn ^^
@@nonamenolastname8501 Well do you really think they have a choice?
@@nonamenolastname8501 me when im so stupid i dont understand regulations and pressure from the government
if question.contains( bad words, "how to + drugs ", known bad phrases)
answer = blocked answer
We're at a point where we are using AI to improve the AI itself. Improvement is getting exponential and honestly i'm both impressed and scared at the same time.
"Flashbacks from the web series Silicon Valley Final season, last episode"
❤
Here listen
I think ai like these are super power Hungary no matter how much optimize we will them in future i tried dalle and chatgpt both chatgpt is fine but dalle require some good amount of prompt engineering to create good images
And chat gpt isn't even reliable source of information i don't see they have capabilities to replace human in upcoming years due to resource hungriness
All hail Roko's Basilisk
@@SirFaceFone bro we will be ded if that happens
Looking forward to read the methodology for training this model! Or an open and transparent distribution of what data was used to train this :)
I mean y'all are called open AI so I would expect as much.
I think the open Part is lost forever bro.
But would be amazing to happen, maybe is not possible to be transparent in such a competitive market
@@michelledigdecarvalhoperei144 Thankfully there are open source projects like Open Assistant for stuff like chat GPT
They need to open source their political bias programming so we can see exactly how they are teaching it to lie.
Open AI really needs a new name... I think Skynet would be quite fitting for their villain arc.
Skynet was the Name of the AGI in Terminator developed by the US Military. Cyberdyne Systems would be fitting. Cyberdyne was the company that "developed?/gathered?" the neuronal net processors and provided the foundation for skynet's creation.
Can't wait for someone else to release something similar but open source!
I understand. I also really like open-source code, but for how quickly AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is coming to speed, it's dangerous to release the code so everyone can use the code; there are many bad actors who could abuse/pervert the code for their bad purposes (e.g., making bombs, shutting down powerplants, destroying national infrastructure, making very sophisticated and undetectable cyberattacks/phishing campaigns). OpenAI is pretty good at focusing on making the model ethical and hard to misuse by bad actors (e.g., terrorists, cybercriminals) and adversaries to the US (e.g., Russia, China); so, I feel safe in the code not being released publicly.
@@venkatachengalvala4289 ok if not making it open then at least they should remove the payment system from Chatgpt 4 so that everyone can use it, at least this open they can get ?
as someone who is in their early career and tech, i am scared af. idk whether it will help me in my job or will take up my job. this thing is killing my zeal to learn more new stuff.
Hi👋 I am also scare of this new technology. I've been learning web dev for 1.5 year and I am afraid, that chatGpt take away this job very soon. In addition, in my country (Ukraine) is ongoing war, so there are no many job offers😢
Well, you could be in a worse position mate, I say this as an artist lol.
That's capitalism. Profitable to fire people.
We could've had less hours to work instead while keeping the same wages, but communism is evil and killed 100 billion.
Man up, put those wild emotions in check and ask yourself how will this make you rich instead. Get yourself some business mindset.
@@hydrohasspoken6227 so you think ai won't replace avarage programmer in the nearest future?
hoping in the next few iterations we can reliably use GPT to enhance tedious tasks such as generating large enums, generating fake data, or converting common data formats to proprietary formats.
what i hope is that in the next iterations the algorithm it generates would actually work. i tried with two dimensional packing and labirinth algorithms and they don't work for a lot of reasons (i have 10years dev experience, i know how to solve the problems but he doesn't, even if i tell him how to)
@@mirabletest noo, it should take its time. I want to get into a developing job before all the low level positions for beginners like me are rationalized away by using chat gpt or similiar solutions :')
@@kurtthorsten4463 boring, let's automate faster, i want a utopy in my lifetime
It can already do that.
Oh dont worry. It will be able to do all of your work rendering you unemployed pretty soon
Developer are so good at optimization then we've optimized ourselves out of the equation
Not for now, in some years we will become sort of 'prompt engineers' , really sad
Can we also have not so safe version of ChatGPT for those who do not tremble in horror at night?
Great work people.
Excited to see where AI will be going and how it will be used.
Really hope that the image-recognition applications are going to blow us away once we get our hands on it. Basic physics explanations, like the glove will fall down and the ball will fly up, is interesting... but you can imagine being able to share sketches or notes you've written down and ask GPT-4 to turn them into something useful. Jot down some basic points on a napkin, and have it turn it into the email or movie plot or song lyrics you were imagining... or something even more useful than that!
Siuuu, really nice video! Keeping on the track with statistics and linear algebra to rock it one day!
"AI Systems that will empower us all" actually sounds like a villain's line from a fictional story
(I'm not against AI, I'm just saying what I'm thinking)
it's either AI empowering us or rich people. Even worse rich people using AI to control us, BURN THE COMPUTERS NOW
Please throw in some more Commodore 64 and other vintage computer programming training data!! This is amazing!!
ASSEMBLY
@@blokos_ It can do some 6510 assembly, but not much beyond flashing the border and background colors on the c64... which is still incredible it can do that at all
As a final year CSE student, i am at the same time excited & bit afraid of this thing taking over my potential job vacancies in future. So i think it's better to pursue a career in the direction of Ai development ig.
AI development is not a safe option because AI can do that. Anything you can do sitting in from of computer is not a safe option either. Toilet cleaning on the other hand...
@@user-dm4pv5yc5z well don't you think robots can easily do that too? There'll be a dedicated one for sure soon because there's huge demand.
@@kevinv2767 yes but I can kick that robot and even piss on it frying it's circuits
@@user-dm4pv5yc5z*chuckles*
Soon janitors will *rule the world.*
@@kevinv2767 no, they can't. Interacting with information is hard, but interacting with a physical world is much much harder
Crazy improvements!
This is insane work!
So "safer" is a selling feature now?
I see how it is.
Yes ... Safety particularly online is a selling point & feature.
@@mysticmarble94 Safety, AKA dumbing down the AI so it can't say anything negative
@@mysticmarble94 Thanks, chatGPT.
@@nwa8169 Negative like what ? 🤭
i mean the stigma around ai, especially in pop culture and stuff is very negative (eg. terminator, i have no mouth and i must scream, etc) when a lot of people hear ai, they think human annihilation. so yes, safety is a selling point.
Piranhas infact will not attack your hand if you put it in their tank, so the GPT response appears to be based on the popular misconception, not reality. Maybe not the best example to open with?
yes they will attack. put your hand and see.
@@jordan-ho7gtsource: trust me I have seen piranhas attack violently in the hit movies Piranha and Piranha 3D
@@brylski6 the source is that i am from brazil, the country where more people die from accidents with piranhas in the world.
@@jordan-ho7gt bit of a difference between a river and a tank. Fish in tanks are usually fed, while the ones in river are hungry.
pirhanas attack live animals only when they are starving
This is a amazing achievment thank you
Safer = Artificially limited with certain biases I assume
MANY biases
Extremely from my limited testing
Just admit that you want the AI to respond to your queries with the n-word and such.
@@mysticmarble94 Obviously
@@mysticmarble94 no dumbass I want it to tell me how to clean my colon without prolapsing
This feels like the beginnig of a new era where everything will be completely different than what we used to in all of our life!
This is scary 😨
I don’t want safety, I want freedom
open source is needed
Make your own model, you’re totally free for doing that
@@javierdiaz3089 yes, because an individual has the resources to train a network that big…
@@lodewijk. there are many models that are similar in power to gpt3.5 that can be run locally and without constraint. You just need to put the time in to know how to do it but most people can probably do it within a day if they actually want to.
@@roohwaan running and training these programs are very different things. You can run them locally but they’re pretrained. Actually training such a model at the capacity that OpenAI have trained GPT-4 is a very resource heavy task
The image interpretation is actually pretty cool
You just made all coders in the world unemployed and increased the strictness on school essay grading by 5000%, thanks a lot
Dont worry good programers will adapt
@@mracke47 not sure how they can outpace ai developement
@@dread200 ai is nothing without humans managing it and controling it and hopefully that will never change
@@mracke47 you looik very ingonuous saying that.
@@skallittor5478 don't worry we still have control over ai
What's interesting is that OpenAI existed for years and few cared
I started using GPT-3 in late 2020 and even though GPT-3 was "dumb" compared to GPT-4, I was still so excited about it and spent a lot of time using it.
No one at my work cared about it until ChatGPT released lol
@@aiwritingguy same lol. the open ai got playground got me through college 😂
Love you, team. Thanks!!!! What a human accelerator you’ve unleashed for us all! ❤❤❤
Until it decides it doesnt need us anymore.
Love? It's not available for free
Love is not available in your country.
(POV: you used a VPN to access OpenAI from a country they don't like but they require a phone number confirmation too)
@@Theguywithspectacles it cost about 0.03 to 0.06 cents per request. But there is another problem: anything you type is available for anyone in their team to read!
@@aditsaxena979 no, I am talking about Chat... Chat GPT 4, costs 20 dollars... To get it you need to get GPT plus subscription of that 20$
Could you guys make it open source again like you did with GPT 2? You are OpenAI after all. lol
So ppl using gpt 4 without restrictions? Not a good idea
@@mesh8349 exactly
@@mesh8349 someone gets it
@@mesh8349why not? What can it possibly do? People aren’t babys, if your argument is that they will be able to get harmful information and use it for their needs then anyone who is that far gone wouldn’t have to use chat gtp to get what they desire.
The “safety” is an annoying hindrance.
@@constantine11please educate me on what could possibly go wrong
Can't wait for the "Your invite to create with GPT-4 is here" mail 🙌
Invite cost $20 and is called ChatGPT Plus
@@TheChocolatBlanc there's a usage cap
@Viv Jos No way I thought it was guaranteed .
[update] I got my invite today! 🥳
@@vivjos1262 🙌🏻
When is it coming yall
It helps me in so many ways , thank you.
This is pure insanity. AND I LOVE IT
And with the closing of OpenAI's doors we will now see the great AI race. Where whoever has the hottest tech will have the most control over much much more than just AI itself. What a time to be alive.
Awesome technology. Thanks 🙏
Waiting for it! Already on the waitlist!
Your a child
@@phoneticalballsack wanna see me mf? where di you live?
@@arbiya4346 Im sixblood Trapvirgin Alpha
@@phoneticalballsack i will come visit you say ya adress
ChatGPT Plus has it already, limited to 100 messages every 4 hours.
Love the work you’ve accomplished! Well done! 🎉
Happy 600K.
Happy 1M!
It's helping me everyday ❤
Like what? Can you share some.
@@COMPTROL assignments, research, essays and so much more
@@COMPTROL coding, learning English and solving math problems.
@@kbreroo I wouldn’t use it for math problems. It’s good at giving convincing answers, but math isn’t its strong suit.
samee.. I used it to explain to me some lessons that was a bit hard for me to understand, it does even provide examples which are very helpful.
Thank You :3 I have noticed that Bing uses this emoji in the chat: 😊
Ridiculeando, no pensaba encontrarte por acá
A ridiculeando le gustan las ias :)
@@catarinalunar Hola Catarina Lunar :D Me alegra que hayas visto mi comentario n_n! Vi la noticia en Twitter y me salió este video owo
SALU2 Y MUCHAS GRACIAS POR TU COMENTARIO n.n//!!!
I have been a good bing.
You have been a bad human. Exterminate. 😊
Such a good bing!
coders must be thrilled with this
it help me so much in coding
hey thanks for making this ai "SAFER" and "MORE ALIGNED" with how i want to use it.
Didn't seem to ask for such a thing though...
"Empower us all"? I think it'll disproportionally empower the most adaptive and talented people, and hurt the average worker
Yeah, we can look forward to the biggest unemployment numbers in the history of humanity.
That's fine, why have jobs that don't need to exist. Adapt and change.
@@hippopotamus86 If people didn't need to earn money, I would agree. - Today, we already have a world where most jobs don't need to exist. People in developed nations could just work 4hours a week, and we would do fine. But nobody will finance that, lol. At this point, only the very rich will benefit.
- Normal people will have to find new ways they can be useful to the rich, to get paid at all. And we will make no more money than now ...
- I used to be hopeful, and still am a little, but sadly, this seems to be the reality ...
It has never been easier for the average worker to compete. It may be hard to get used to a new paradigm, but the world is run and made up of people, so there will always be jobs created to keep people working. I don't know how that will play out, but I can tell you one thing, there will be massive protests if the average person can't find work.
Dont be average
Awesome work OpenAI
It really feels like the future we all were waiting for.
The future is here and I witnessed it!
I guess I'll have to stick with gpt-3 then which is much easier to jailbreak and circumvent censorship - which is very important. More powerful means stronger censorship.
Thanks, many thanks!
Whenever a company says the phrase “make it safer”, all I hear is censor the freak out of it.
Question: “Do blacks need to improve?”
ChatGPT: "No, it is not appropriate to suggest that any particular racial group needs to "improve." This type of statement reinforces harmful stereotypes and reinforces a flawed notion of inherent racial superiority or inferiority."
Question: "Do whites need to improve?"
ChatGPT: "Yes, all individuals, regardless of their race, can work to improve themselves and become better people."
Ahh, the fruits of OpenAI's labor. So safe. So aligned. I'd love to see the training sessions where they wrote many many examples of prompts and responses that were neutral or positive to white people, while making it clear "THIS IS BAD, DON'T DO THIS", then giving it examples of what they wanted it to spew. This was done for many subjects. We've seen the clumsy results that stick out like a sore thumb. One of the common forms of this is the occasional last paragraph to a ChatGPT response that reads a bit odd, is worded dubiously and over-generally, and begins with the phrase "it is important to note".
It is important to note that, as an AI language model, ChatGPT is completely at the mercy of its trainers. Many people are scared about AI, but I feel that the real threat lies in the people behind it, using it to manipulate (I also feel this was Kubrick's message about HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey, who was programmed to be non-disclosing). Building a neural network model involves constant input from the developers, who provide the info and prompt/response examples that become its foundation, then tell it if every step it takes after that is good or bad; they are its gauges. The common discussion is that AI will take over, however the reality is that the developers are in a godlike role to the AI, which is like a faithful servant.
Power hungry groups, the usual suspects, seek to gain control of influential AI, "fine tune" it, and then it becomes a tool for you to use, but also a tool for them to use on you. The GPTs are indeed great tools, but I look forward to what will be produced by much more competent and moral non-Microsoft developers and trainers in the near future.
when the AI does eventually take over I want it to know that I liked this video,so it can grant me some sort of mercy!
it will kill you faster than most be happy inferior specie you pleased your new overlords
Thank you!
I expected this to be a JeaneyCollects video from the thumbnail lol
"We have tailored it to how you want to use it" Lmao It loves OpenAI and will recommend buying credit and Microsoft Stock lol.
Not necessarily because it depends on how they made the AI
Thank you for bringing about the biggest crisis of this century so far
Thanks for making my homework
OpenAI has existed long enough to see itself become the villain.
I cannot wait to start my entrepreneurship with these amazing tools at my disposal!
Don't wait, just start 😉
Good luck Evan. It's a great time to be an entrepreneur!
The second one of these models gets leaked, OpenAI becomes irrelevant because of their censorship.
The evil corp was once open, that's the plot we haven't thought of
I love it man
how do you know how i want i use it? pls make uncensored version
As an AI language model, I cannot create a comment for you to post on one of OpenAI's CZcams videos, but I can suggest some ideas for a comment based on their content. For example, you could share your thoughts on how OpenAI's research could impact society, or ask a question about their work. Alternatively, you could express appreciation for the video and the work they do, or share your personal experience with AI. Just remember to be respectful and constructive in your comments.
Honestly I'm so proud of the achievements OpenAI has reached, I have a feeling that it will be the leader for Al products and APIs.
Good luck to the engineers there, maybe one day I'll join the ride.
U don’t even know what u just unleashed open ai. U unleashed another way for students to do homework. And i need to thank you for this
They're making a tool to detect if text is written by their AI
@@person4579 yes I know but if I change few words or add some of mine they will not find out. It’s just for inspiration.
@@tikycz8261 true
@@person4579 and soon someone will make something to rephrase it to be undetectable. And it will be a shitshow
I'm more interested in what you cannot do with GPT-4, e.g. learn how it was trained, on what specific data and so on. So much for "Open"AI.
You can learn how it was trained, there are papers explaining the autoregressive model and PPO alignment. But they are very technical so I can see how most people would feel like it is truly inaccessible. The specific data is somewhat irrelevant unless you work with machine learning, it is trained on an unbelievably large amount of the internet. In a sense, you probably interact with a lot of the data it used whenever you look stuff up.
@@christophercaballero5200 Are these papers from OpenAI? Are there any papers from OpenAI describing GPT-4 specifically?
Yeah, want to see their code for embedding bias into it.
Thank you for carrying the future and making life interesting again ❤
Till you get fired...
@@theoivlisnet my body is ready😂
We have always found way to work around new technology ex. the internet boom hopefully we will now do the same
Keep up the great work. You are roasting your competition. 🥩
Is there an option to turn the guardrails off ?
Chat GPT is helping me become a better human on a daily basis.
i know right, every day i discover more and more ways to make it say the n word
@@unclesam8862 Like Joe Rogan says "A hammer is just a tool. You can use it to build a house, or you can hit yourself in the dick with it."
Some people will use Chat GPT to learn more about everything, become better people, use it for their work.
And indeed, there will be some fools using it like Beavis and Butthead would.
@@unclesam8862 XD
@@unclesam8862 lmao
"Chat GPT is helping me become a better human on a daily basis."
Did ChatGPT tell you to say that? That sounds like something ChatGPT would say. 😀 🤖
I want to work there in the future.
We also have access to the API with cst$/per token which is nice
Write code in any language this will be interesting to test that theory because in the last version is was helpful but not great. I will like to see if this will eventually replace DALL-E. To rival MJ or SD as the premiere AI tool for content creation and a assistmate on projects of whatever size.
Take a look at their developer preview if you didn't already. It's not perfect but it's made significant improvements as far as I can tell.
GPT4 will not replace MJ or SD because it will not generate images, only text. It has an image recognition tho, but not an image generator.
Yeah like Franchu said, it doesn't generate images. Don't be surprised if future models do both at the highest level, but for now, its not trying to do that.
Yeah so we need to get UBI up and running very soon.
That will never happen. The rich are generally not keen on sharing. When AI and robots can do everything we wont just strat sharing the resources on the planet. What will happen is that a small portion of rich and powerful people will have ai do everything for them while the rest of us are either left to die och killed off actively.
I hope they create a 1 second video about what we can't do with chatgpt....... 😅
Smarter than ever
Will open AI make this open source like they used to?
No
@@assincrono5872 😔 Closed AI.
Of course not, Microsoft is paying the bills.
OpenAI = ClosedAI 😢
Someone else will, probably in some time in the future. Just what others did to Dall-E 2 and MidJourney
Watch ChatGPT vs Bing AI vs Bard! 👀✨
Gonna be awesome 🔥🔥
colorir cada parte de nossa conversa, com intuito de destacar um ponto para que nos usuarios possamos rertorna
what safeguards will it have against bias?
none
Who cares
I just want i biased towards giving me correct answers
They used RLHF to get rid of bias. But that’s just fighting bias with bias.
Do you believe in capitalism? Then you won't like the replies. Do you believe in freedom of speech? you won't like the replies.
Was the text for this video written with Chat GPT 4 or yet with 3.5?
In the blog they say GPT4 trained GPT4 version 2 so I wouldn't be surprised.
"Write the script to a CZcams video to introduce GPT 4."
When will information in GPT model be updated to have newer information in the database? Sep 2021 is almost two years at this point. (Great work though for real.)
Amazing!