Velikost videa: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Zobrazit ovladače přehrávání
Automatické přehrávání
Přehrát
in the regression, u run training instead of training2, why...?
Thank you so DR. for this explanation. I wish all professors could have passion to teach econometrics like you do. I learnt a lot from this lecture.
Sir, why have you not taken all variables in validating assumption 2? Why you leave the variable - female?
shouldn't you use training2 for your example 2 psmatch2?
why did you use variable training instead of training2 when you proceed with PSM approach?
Other people's videos show the difference is the impact (2.34), but here is the coefficient, ehmm...a bit confusing which one is the correct one
Thank you very much for the comprehensive lecture on PSM. My question is since the t-stat is less than 1.96, can we still say that the ATT result is significant?
Excellent lecture on PSM. Students new to impact evaluation will be highly benefitted. Many thanks, dear Richard.
I would give this 101/100.
hello, does the balancing test result are one of the steps before running PSM? or just common support assumption?
Excellent explanation! I learned a lot from these lectures! Much appreciated!
The BEST video I've ever seen !!!
Great!! Best PSM video
Thank for very much sir. This lecture is really helpful for me. It is clearly explained, really straightforward and systematic. Please keep it up.
This EXCELLENT. thank you so much for this great explanation.
very well explanation, thankyou Richard.
Excellent video. Excellent explanation of PSM and how to apply it.
This was simply beautiful
This is excellent. You made the explanation very simple. Please keep it up
Loved this! Thank you so much.
in the regression, u run training instead of training2, why...?
Thank you so DR. for this explanation. I wish all professors could have passion to teach econometrics like you do. I learnt a lot from this lecture.
Sir, why have you not taken all variables in validating assumption 2? Why you leave the variable - female?
shouldn't you use training2 for your example 2 psmatch2?
why did you use variable training instead of training2 when you proceed with PSM approach?
Other people's videos show the difference is the impact (2.34), but here is the coefficient, ehmm...a bit confusing which one is the correct one
Thank you very much for the comprehensive lecture on PSM. My question is since the t-stat is less than 1.96, can we still say that the ATT result is significant?
Excellent lecture on PSM. Students new to impact evaluation will be highly benefitted. Many thanks, dear Richard.
I would give this 101/100.
hello, does the balancing test result are one of the steps before running PSM? or just common support assumption?
Excellent explanation! I learned a lot from these lectures! Much appreciated!
The BEST video I've ever seen !!!
Great!! Best PSM video
Thank for very much sir. This lecture is really helpful for me. It is clearly explained, really straightforward and systematic. Please keep it up.
This EXCELLENT. thank you so much for this great explanation.
very well explanation, thankyou Richard.
Excellent video. Excellent explanation of PSM and how to apply it.
This was simply beautiful
This is excellent. You made the explanation very simple. Please keep it up
Loved this! Thank you so much.