VFX Artists DEBUNK Bigfoot
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 05. 2024
- Austin's hour-long Fusion Graphics Tutorial is out right now on ► corridordigital.com/
Our videos are made possible by our amazing website subscribers. Consider joining us - there's even a FREE TRIAL!
Sam and Niko venture deep into the woodlands of North America in an attempt to find out if viral Bigfoot footage is real, or if the "missing link" is still missing.
Follow us on Instagram ►
/ corridordigital
OUR GEAR, SOFTWARE & PARTNERS ►
Puget Systems Computers: bit.ly/PC_Puget_Workstations
Lighting by Aputure: bit.ly/CORRIDOR_LIGHTS
Our Go-To Gear: bhpho.to/3r0wEnt
ActionVFX: bit.ly/TheBest_ActionVFX
Cinema4D: bit.ly/Try_Cinema4D
Nuke by The Foundry: bit.ly/Nuke_Compositing
Simulations in Houdini: bit.ly/HoudiniSims
Octane Render by OTOY: bit.ly/Octane_Wrender
MUSIC ►
Epidemic: bit.ly/Corridor_Music click this link for a free month! - Zábava
I would love to see a bigfoot challenge where you guys compete to make the most convincing bigfoot footage
That would be an awesome content to watch👍👌
Yes i wanted to see it, i was thinking about it whole time
😏 maybe CC not skilled enough to make a convicing bigfood...
There have to be some talented cosplay fans here who could help with the raw footage.
Guarantee this video is for testing the waters of this exact idea.
Yess, please
Bigfoot caught on tape challenge with the crew needs to happen. I want to see Niko and Sam's effect shots of a non-humananoid Bigfoot creature. Make it happen guys
Also let viewers make and submit one too.
Get Clint back in the Mocap suit
We need more videos like project loom
Maybe even broaden it to general cryptid footage
Bigfoot is humanoid by definition, not sure what you’re proposing.
What impresses me most about the Patterson footage is that all the attempts to re-create it have looked SO BAD. If it's fake, Patterson and Gimlin were better special effects men than anyone who has made a Bigfoot-related Hollywood movie. IMO Jurassic Park was the point at which movie effects caught up.
Regarding the gait, the late physical anthropologist Grover Krantz identified some really significant differences with humans. For example, most humans spend 95% of their walking stride with one foot or the other on the ground; Patty has both feet on the ground for 20% of the stride. Humans tend to fully lock their knees at certain points, whereas Patty's knees are notably bent at all times. Closest parallel I can think of is the way SWAT teams move when they're trying not to make audible footsteps. It's not an impossible gait for a human, but it's not the default one either by any means. If you walk like that on the sidewalk you'll look WEIRD.
I'm glad you guys brought up Planet of the Apes, because the head costume designer for that movie said he and his team would not be able to produce the Patterson footage. In particular he cited the movement of muscles under the fur, which get hidden by a suit. He said the hoax would require a person of that build, with fur glued to his body.
And as far as the dude who claimed to be in the suit? There have been like 6 guys who took credit for that. It's a really quick and easy way to get yourself on the local news.
Yup. There have been a few clowns who claimed to have been the guy in the suit. They couldn’t even take anyone to the filming location.
What stumps me about the film is this: let’s say it was a hoax. Let’s say a couple of nearly broke rodeo cowboys came up with a suit, in 1967, that was decades ahead of what the best Hollywood artists could make. And they made the suit a female with large breasts-because, hey, why not make it more complicated than it needed to be? Then they travel deep into the woods on horseback with their accomplice (again, no credible one has ever come forward)… and then shoot just a few seconds of shaky footage. It kind of beggars belief. If they were able to make a costume that good, they could have made far more money in the movie business than they ever did off the supposed hoax. And if someone else made it? No one has ever come forward with a convincing example of the costume.
For me it’s easier to believe that Bigfoot exists and Patterson and Gimlin happened to catch a few seconds of shaky footage of one than to believe the preposterous things I’d have to believe to think it was a hoax.
So you find it more believable that a creature could survive for hundreds of thousands of years in almost complete secrecy, with no one EVER finding a dead one or providing any convincing evidence in the year 2024, than some guys being able to rig a Bigfoot costume in the 1960s? Yeah okay.
Besides that, John Landis said the costume was created by professional special effects people to fool Patterson. No one has ever accused Patterson of faking the costume himself.
Bigfoot believers are no different than Loch Ness Monster hunters or the UFO community. No one ever has any convincing evidence. Just decade after decade of blurry, shaky footage and "I saw something or know a guy who saw something".
And to add one more fun detail: I would point to the head as being the most difficult part of this costume to replicate. If you look closely at it, you notice that the head doesn't have human proportions. In fact, the forehead looks like it gets smaller up top, which is impossible for costumes to do. Especially back then. Costumes can only add, they can't subtract.
Omg. This would be easy to take. Is has been reproduced by the BBC. They just showed somebody (Bob Heronimus) with the same stride!
@@andrewreid4320The level of logic, or lack thereof, you display here just explains everything one needs to know about Bigfoot.
Watch Thinker Thunker's Patterson-Gimlin footage and then talk about body proportions, would love to see it!
I would absolutely love to watch them debunk sea monsters videos
Same.
I have a fear of this but, I would still force myself to watch it.
@@Dipvide Same, will watch it but for sure have a pillow to shield myself with
@@Dipvide The Ocean is the scariest place on earth
theres footage that went around around a marine biology boards back in like the early 2000's of an unknown sea animal, not a single scientist could identify it and the person that shot it and posted the footage was a marine biologist too. I beleive i saw the footage talked about on trey the explainer's page.
Time to do a fun challenge where you all try to come up with the best bigfoot shot that avoids low quality shaky camera
only if you're buying/renting the costumes
Release the videos anonymously over the next 6 months.. see if they convince millions
@@bbloomfield6497 I love it
Considering every action scene in american TV shows and films is made this same way, I'd say talk to one of those directors for tips on how to do it.
I would have liked if they had shown why they felt Patty was a costume. I was looking forward to seeing an in depth analysis.
I second you on that. As would I. Unfortunately, their reasoning was quite paltry.
Yeah me too, this was lame.
@@dsbmitchell One reason is that Patterson wrote a book called Do abominable snowman of North America exist??? He drew Patty in it with breast and all.....Two years before he flim her?
@@elsapoelsapo1821 Thanks for your comment. Yes, I am aware of that. While I can understand some people using this as cause for concern, it doesn’t particularly bother me. Researchers and scientists generate hypotheses all the time that they will find such and such data to support this or that theory, and quite often they actually end up turning up just such evidence that goes against a null hypothesis. As a scientist myself, I am well aware of this. I don’t see much difference in what happened with the Patterson film.
Moreover, if these hairy hominids exist, compose a breeding population, and one of them was captured on film, there is more than a small likelihood that the subject filmed would be a female since females as well as males are in fact needed to sustain such a breeding population.
In all, I see no problem with the fact that the subject was a female or bore similarity to some of Patterson’s previous work (which was itself similar to another popular reported sighting). I think interested investigators should focus on the subject in the film itself (its anatomy, biomechanics, etc.) rather than the person behind the film, and allow that evidence to speak for itself.
Edit/Update: I now have a copy of Patterson’s book, and the majority of the drawings in the book are of male Sasquatch-not female ones. So there does not seem to be any indication that he had some sort of pre-conceived plan to specifically film a female Sasquatch.
@@dsbmitchell Most people don't know the background of the hoax. Roger was making a movie, where he and his bigfoot buddies were going to hunt down bigfoot. Bob Heironimus and his brother Howard starred in it too, along with Bob Gimlin as an Indian tracker. Roger ended up dumping the project as he couldn't get the further funding from his wealthy brother in law Al DeAtley so he sold the film as a real life encounter instead. Roger's co-worker Janos Prohaska, in working with ANE built the costume. The head piece used was a taurean head created by Wah Chang. It was common practice, and still is, to put together parts of different costumes to make "new" ones.
“I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. ” - Mitch Hedberg
A humanoid displacer beast. Which also explains why nobody has landed a shot on one.
"It's coming right for us!"
Not only is bigfoot blurry but when bigfoot walks, every step it takes makes the earth shake which leads to shaky camera so before blaming the camera man, blame bigfoot.
@@chaoticneutral6288 a fantastic comedian, his style of comedy was telling one liners and short jokes like the Bigfoot one, he’s one of my favorites
@@chaoticneutral6288 A great and chill comedian
This went from a debunk video to a “How to improve your fake big foot videos” video. I love it!
They were just so disappointed at the quality they were presented with, it was barely an effort for them. At least some of the ufo and ghost videos presented some sort of challenge.
Bigfoot challenge incoming
@@Hawk_of_Battle yeah except they were looking at the Patterson film at the end and mostly convinced it's a real Bigfoot
@@kerzytibok3211 they found that original footage the most convincing compared to everything else. That’s a very different thing from being mostly convinced it’s real.
Ya u just gotta get your shins cut, steal the fat suit from the big momma movies, stop by the planet of the apes set, learn how to rock down to electric boogorilladoo.
Then you just challenge your camera guy shots, because your gonna look so real he might try to shoot you without the camera!
It would be such a cool challenge for yall to make your own cgi cryptid footage and compete to see who can make it the most realistic
you didn't debunk anything on the Patterson film, you just made jokes.
I don't think you were listening very carefully. Try again :)
All fakes, people will believe anything 🤔
There's video on the costume shown.
exactly, plus their take apart was of a revamped piece of footage. Anyone who has seen the original can see this one is altered already. They probably did it so they could make the jokes and "debunk' it. This is why you have to leave you mommy's basemen now and then.
100% want to see you guys do a cryptozoology challenge. Whoever can make the most believable footage of a monster of their choosing.
Good idea
Ooh! Make it random! Like they gotta pull the name from a hat!
This is a cool idea!
Yesss
I second this ☝ Please do this 🙏
A lot of us would love to see this turned into a VFX challenge!
Totally agree
Yes, make the best Big Foot Fotage we ever seen!
@@Borni84 they wouldnt do shit cuz its real
@@Natty5D LOL you can tell by the look on the faces at the end that the Patterson film has them seriously thinking it might be a real creature
@@kerzytibok3211 Yeah and they called it a him even though she clearly has breasts, lol. If they didn't point out the breasts, then they barely analyzed these videos and only made assumptions.
The most compelling videos I’ve seen were one in Russia where the proportions were Gibbon like and the “Bigfoot” was leaping while running, and another where a figure single handed throws a tree like a spear.
More of a sapling than a tree. Bigfoot exists though.
Scots can throw even bigger logs.
Yeah right
I want to see Corridor crew attempt to make a bigfoot footage that even Captain Disillusion couldn't debunk unless he watched the process video.
Thanks for using my stock footage clip at 0:11 seconds @CorridorCrew! Very surreal when I noticed. Big fan you guys.
I would like to see you with Adam Savage trying to create the most realistic bigfoot tape
there would be someone not in on it who'll pass it off as real evidence haha
@@360.Tapestry Oh 100%. Even people who Know where it came from will go around posting it claiming it's real just for internet clout/attention/memes. Guarantee you it'll constantly get posted on places like tiktok where people pass it off as real just for views.
Man, that would be so cool. Adam with practical effects and corridor with the CGI.
The interesting part is that Adam and the Corridor guys would give it their best shot and still fall short of the '67 Patterson film --- then they would admit it's a real Bigfoot !!
I was thinking this and then I saw it. Maybe Corridor can create a frame by frame CGI recreation of the Paterson Film.
Mic Dodge, a famous woodsman in Washington state, is known for dressing up in a homemade beaver pelt bigfoot costume and trolling bigfoot hunters in the forests up there. He's been doing it for decades. The Discovery channel had a series about him for a while and they filmed him doing it one night. The hoots and howls he would do are almost a perfect match for some the so-called bigfoot recordings. He took trolling to a whole new level.
and hes now dead, because americans shot him. xd
@jbholland1987 Is he actually?
First thing I thought what he's probably dead hah
Sounds so dangerous. Looking him up, I don't think he needs a costume either.
Do you know what the series was called? That sounds kind-of amazing, lol
Are there people doing the same in the nahanni valley, Northwest Territories? Are they taking people and carrying them up a 1000 ft rock face? People, children, have been found in these impossible to reach places.
Interesting to see if you can muscle "rig" the Patterson film , including the right leg muscle quiver as it walks , like the gorilla clip you included
Yeah, half the things they said would make it more convincing when playing the ape clips were actually in the Patterson film. Long limbs, flexing muscles in places that aren’t anatomically correct for humans. Not saying it’s real but if it’s a hoax it’s very impressive.
They also say the gait looks human when it famously isn’t, any primate biologist will tell you that’s not a natural way for a human to walk. Again, not saying it’s real, but if it isn’t not, it’s a lucky or brilliant hoax, not an obvious one.
Plus the Bigfoot has boozies, a female Bigfoot
@@ModernEphemera the human they show after walks exactly the same. Were you even watching the video? And those boots you can see on the legs.
It is evidently costume, because you cant see muscle movement.
@@jaroslavpesek6642 what? Watch the right leg when it lands
I just want to say that this show has helped me a lot with understanding movies better. I'm young, and I normally just enjoy the movie because it is a fun movie, but now after watching all of your videos, I have a new perspective on the movies I watch. Thank you
I just use these so when I watch scary videos, I know it's not real.
Be careful! Anyone can say ANYTHING! Just as much as these guys claiming that they're able to detect a costume when they clearly can't. Sorry, but I trust an expert with a PhD who said the original film could not be a costume with VERY good reasoning for why over these college dudes, sitting and chillin, mocking, and who have NEVER EVER left the comfort of their indoor plumbing and delivery pizza. Probably drunk and drinking while filling this?! Be more skeptical just as much as these guys are skeptical. They're simply incorrect about SOME of their criticisms and they are legit in others. But remember, ANYONE can say ANYTHING! just like me! So becareful of what you believe.
Jees. I just wanted to say that I like their vids.
@@fuzyfuzfuz2 it's not that deep 😭
Also, I'm pretty sure they're certified in VFX mean they can easily detect when something is edited.
@@paxonm3281ignore them.
I laughed when you mentioned adding weight to things when filming because one thing my fiancé and I always call out in movies or shows are people carrying coffee cups that are CLEARLY empty…it’s so obvious, like just put water or something in them! Lol
One trick is to use jello!! Mix up jello in a cup. It solidifies and wont spill or splash around but it still has the same weight as if it were coffee !!
Safer to use on set because less likely to spill on equipment or costumes
My pet peeve is actors carrying ”babies” that are clearly dolls with no weight.
I know I’m not the first to suggest this but Corridor should definitely attempt to make the most convincing Bigfoot footage with practical and visual effects. Now whether the attempt is released anonymously or not is another thing to think about
Your definitely not the first.
Your like the 20th
Anonymously. Cuz it'll give it time to see how easily the popular opinion is convinced
if i had that kind of VFX knowledge and skill i would definitely make videos like that and upload them on a throwaway reddit account just to mess with people
This is actually a terrible idea for anyone invested in keeping Sasquatch as a joke or myth. What would happen is they would try to do their own fakery it would immediately be torn apart by experts all the while giving the PG footage more validity. It’s like the pyramids we couldn’t replicate it if we tried.
These guys don't work in practical effects or costumes so it's outside their skillset to try and recreate that.
u guys get sm funnier as time goes on lol love yall
0:30 - You had the chance to call it "Bigfootage" and missed it...
Corridor should make their own convincing version of all of these.
i thought they would the first time they did bigfoot!
my exact thoughts, then they should show it to Nat Geo as real proof lmao
Yes!!
@@cindyespindola4946 Maybe they've already did, we just don't know which one is it
I’m still waiting for the Corridor Digital moon landing
I want to see a "Can the Debunkers be Debunked" series. Let Sam and Niko create some footage and do their SFX magic without anyone else at CC knowing. Then have the footage sent anonymously to Corridor. It doesn't have to be bigfoot either- well I want like 5 or 6 of these, so Bigfoot at some point.
this is a great idea
I live in Australia and I've lived in the bush for 30 years. 10 years ago when I went for a walk I saw a bigfoot walk across the trail I was on. It was 9 or 10ft tall. It looked at me as it stepped across the trail and it just kept walking through. I shit myself then turned around and walked home. After my experience I looked into the subject and I realised there were thousands of sightings all around the world. I came to the conclusion that every single person is lying or there is actually something out there. I don't believe that thousands of people around the world are lying.
Good idea
@@lachie4017 maybe it's not a bigfoot. Perhaps something far more mysterious
@Abaseen-خان💜 nah what I saw was 100% a sasquatch
I feel like having the stuntmen experts on for teams of real vs cgi could make a bigfoot contest really intresting and add a lot
I appreciate y'all stabilising the footage in the close ups!
Those are available online, they didn't do that.
They didn't. They're college dudes. Likely drinking and laughing at these videos but have NO credentials. They're like food critics. Or movie critics. They're just commenting so people like YOU will watch and belive them. Again! Anyone can say anything! So be very skeptical or what people tell you! Becareful of anyone who says, "bigfoot is real!" AND becareful of people who say "bigfoot I'd NOT real!!!' Always be skeptical of rhe extremists!!! The middle way is the best way
This is officially one of the best series on CZcams now.
true
Yeppers! Best ever food reviews is one of the best as well! What others are there? Idk much 😂
No
sooo true :)
Should be nice to see you debunk "Flat earthers" and show how a sunset should look like on a flat earth (if it sets).
after all these critiques, you guys should totally make the best Bigfoot footage you can, filmed as practically as you can, and make a video about it
You guys are awesome I really love the work you guys do. Keep doing big things and God bless🎉
I would love to see a sea creature Debunk video and love your videos!!! 🤩
Fun fact, the Patterson film is the single most analyzed piece of footage ever filmed, with the exception of the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination.
Yes, analyzed, but never successfully debunked by anyone (including this video)
Edit: I find it problematic that the Patterson-Gimlin film has been SO excessively analyzed and yet not explained away, and yet videos like hyper-simplistic, even dismissive reviews such as this one by the Corridor Crew can be accepted outright. The outcome is not educational nor is it scientific.
Basically made this comment in more length earlier, but you couldn’t even make a skin tight “ape suit” on your own in 1967, and NO one made something like that, that you could just go buy.
@@hamilcar682 Precisely. Though the mastermind behind the costuming for the original Planet of the Apes film was credited by many in Hollywood for making the “ape suit” in the Patterson-Gimlin film, he himself never actually said that he made it. Loren Coleman’s discussion of the history behind all this was I think eye-opening and nuanced.
So glad that people like you are making comments on these kinds of CZcams videos. I was displeased to see so many comments supporting the video uncritically.
They already debunked the Paterson film. No reason to go any farther.
@@vincentwiese8414 ummm who is “They”
"Why hasn't anyone shot one?" Sam never disappoints!
A few thoughts: it's not that common to shoot a large animal and have it drop dead on the spot. Even a good lung shot often sees the animal run some distance before it collapses. Then you would have to track its blood trail to find it. And finding anything dead that is camouflaged for its environment can be very difficult. Having listened to a lot of alleged first hand accounts from hunters on Sasquatch Chronicles, I can offer a few more possible insights- 1) many witnesses say that resemble humans to an extent where it gives them pause before firing. Is it a guy in a suit? Is it a prank? It's said their eyes look very human-like. 2) Most hunters are hunting deer and aren't carrying serious firepower. If you have an ~8ft. creature and you have .270winchester rifle or even a .44mag sidearm, you don't really have stopping power for that animal. 3) There is a theory that they have the ability to emit infrasound capable of subduing humans. Many alleged witnesses claim that their roar freezes you, blanks your mind or otherwise effects the nervous system so that you can't act. Many also say they are left with a residual malaise or morbidity often for several days after that may be an after effect of infrasonic attack.
Yes try to shoot a 800 plus pound ape like creature and try to survive or catch it before it runs off see how well that works for ya.
@@evan_stadler dude, good elk bull doesn’t weigh much less than that. A good moose will be 1000 plus, you can definetely shoot something that big and have a reasonable chance of it collapsing instantly. People absolutely would’ve shot at least one by now.
@@evan_stadler If we can hunt whales, we can shoot a bigfoot.
@@shmekelfreckles8157 yes but it's believed by many that there's typically more than just the one you see so if that's true who knows how many of the 1000s of peaple that go missing every year did shoot and maybe kill one but didn't live to tell the tail since they didn't realize they were out numbered. I'm not saying these things are 100% real but the amount of evidence there is you can't just say "well we haven't killed one so can't be real" that's super arrogant. Not to mention the countless peaple who have seen these things and have permanently changed by the experience. Just open your eyes a little do some research before making bold and arrogant decisions.
I think Wren has some 3D printing mechatronics projects coming up... Corridor Digital makes the ultimate big foot video
The dude climbing the fence is hilarious.
Now I just want corridor to make a fake bigfoot shot just to show us how real it could look when experts do it
It would still look fake
well there is the sonoma one, v=yiiICn-wTQA, that Penn & Teller did and released in the wild in secret to rile up the bog foot people.
@@Joe-ji9wk Still probably more convincing than all these so called videos of Bigfoot.
It would be cool if they compete with each other to make the more realistic bigfoot video
People would just share it as proof without context, same as with the Bosstown Dynamics videos lol
A debunk on sea creatures and a studio contest to see the best Bigfoot footage would be great!
Yes to them both!
Can't wait for that ocean debunk video!
Yes! Please make your own bigfoot video(s)!!! It would be very interesting to see how you guys go about it.
No stop faking videos
I like how Nico described the exact techniques used in Harry and The Hendersons. Would be a good idea to do a react to that movie and other animatics.
movie? wasn't that a tv show?
I still remember that shot of Harry in the sunlight getting hit by the car at the start of the movie really freaking me out was a kid lol.
@@LuisSierra42 It was a movie first; then a television series was adapted from it.
@@LuisSierra42 It was a movie first, but they turned it into tv show because it was so popular.
I had the same thought. I hope @CorridorCrew reacts to the Harry and The Hendersons movie. Great idea to look at animatics too!
I love that this is a video basically informing people how to make better Bigfoot footage and I love it! I really hope we get some better stuff out there. AND YES PLEASE DO water creatures! they're creepy AF
better videos? wtf this people actually think that u just ge out u phone and as fast u get a foot on video? even get a bear on video on the wilderness is not that commun get a foot is 1 in a million
My IQ has gone down trying to read your comment 😂
@@CATSWITHKYLA sorry inglish in not my native language
@@Mrpizzas664 I kinda thought that. Just so you know you said beer🍺 which is a drink and I think you meant deer, the animal 🦌 in case you want to edit it!!
@@CATSWITHKYLA yes i know xD beer or cerveza here in mexico i get it ! i mean bear that means oso
Great content guys. Out here doing the lord’s work
If you did a sea monster debunk. It would be one of your best debunk episodes.
To debunk that people would be afraid to be that close, you should watch some footage of all the people that get too close to Bison and any other animal at Yellowstone. While most people have common sense there are a lot that don't
Fan fact: any time you see an animal with "reverse knees," there's like a 95% chance you're just looking at its ankles.
yeah it's called digitigrade walking
100%
@@chaoticneutral6288 lol
Honestly compared to pretty much every other animal, human walking is weird af, we have weird extended heels which WALK ON instead of toes
The Pennsylvania Bigfoot video is one i would love you guys to look at, it's an articulating face and long arm movement, definitely a creative one y'all are asking for
You guys need to make some convincing bigfoot sighted footage using your proper vfx and filmmaking knowledge, I'd love to see that happen
You guys should absolutely debunk sea monsters.
You should also absolutely try and make your own digital bigfoot videos!!
I agree, sea monsters are real once you look at the actual species that live on the depths.
These guys are giving the best directors notes for future “sightings”
In 1976, I attended a lecture by a man named Bob Hieronimous on the history of the Great Seal of the U.S. Many years later, he claimed he was the person wearing the saquatch suit in that first video. He said a friend hired him to play the role but never paid him. You can look him up and read his version of the story.
I would LOVE a sea monster debunking episode!
Now I wanna see a vfx challenge of who can make the most convincing bigfoot footage
I definitely want to see the sea monster debunk video :D
Here's a fun fact that I don't get to share often, but figured it would be fitting to share here tho, my dad knew the guy in the gorilla suit in the first clip( 1:05 ). My dad even took me to where it was taken too.
I'm surprised they concluded so fast that the Paterson movie was a guy in a costume because they thought the proportion and movement looked too human for them, yet, this is the most studied bigfoot footage ever and most of the scientists agree that this is not human proportion. I'm not saying this is a real bigfoot footage, but they were a bit too fast at debunking it. They didn't even talked about the breast.
They were too afraid to say that the subject in the video was likely a real bigfoot, so they simply glossed over it.
My thoughts exactly.
Hate to say it, cause they seem like nice guys, but they come off not only a little arrogant, but kind of stupid in any historical knowledge of their own field, VFX! If the footage shows “a guy in a suit”, how did they make a hyper accurate, skin tight costume…in 1967… spandex fiber wasn’t even invented until 1958, just 9 years earlier, and wasn’t even used as a whole garment (pants, top, suit) until the winter of ‘68 when the French Ski team debuted spandex/Lycra uniforms forms, which had to be specially designed and made by DuPont itself.
@william sleeper Exactly, one again I am not saying this is the real deal, but it's the most studied one and still not debunked. It's easy to claim "it's a guy in a costume" at every footage...
The few comments in this thread exhibit more critical thinking skills than the whole of the CC video combined. I have enjoyed some of the CCs other videos, but this one is a slap in the face to the pursuit of open and honest skepticism. And yes, as already stated, the arrogance doesn’t help at all.
I'd love to see Corridor try to make a convincing monster footage as part of these videos. Or maybe it could be a whole new series.
looking forward to the ocean debunk!
I know Adam Savage has done a few costumes with puppeted heads, like his bear costume. Maybe you could do another collab with him to make super realistic bigfoot footage
You guys HAVE to turn this into a challenge video! Would love to see you guys recreate this kind of stuff
We already know Sam will make a whole game out of that challenge.
I could be wrong but the left footage at 6:19 looks like it could be their studio, meaning they have a Bigfoot suit and might be filming something like this soon
The BBC tried it with the Paterson/Gimlin film , but they failed, and that was more than 50 years after the fact.
I'd love if two of the guys secretly made their own footage (practical or CGI) and sneak it into their compilation. Then they pretend they believe it and see what the third guy says!
Nice profile pic
Easy pick, though-- the believable one is the CC one
I love those t-shirts that say something along the lines of: "Bigfoot, Hide and Seek Champion"
As a self proclaimed paranormal enthusiast who takes pride in making sure the vast endless hole of ghost footage can be at least semi explained you guys are AWESOME glad I came across your channel this is absolutely what I needed keep up the great work CRIPDID 😂😂😂😂😂
When the Patterson film was the first to pop up, it was a bit disappointing that they didn’t look into it as far as other researchers have. Being such an old video and considered the best, it’s been used and looked at a lot.
Yea and they said the proportions were human when there clearly not. Aswell as they just keep saying it's a guy in a suit for like every video. Disappointed in this video as well
@@evan_stadler ya there's muscle movement under the fur, it's clearly female which is an odd choice for a costume and it's gait is not human. They can't make that as a costume right now let alone back then. Those planet of the apes costume look goofy in comparison. The guy who claimed he faked it had no proof, it was simply his word. This was a lazy effort to debunk and I honestly expected better.
@@Pj-fm7oe 100%
@@Pj-fm7oe Well if bigfoot is so real why don't you just go and film him/her yourself?
@@XxDemon23xX
Did I say it was real? I laid out reasons that the footage is more compelling than they let on. That to you equals I am required to film the legendary animal personally? Does this strike you as a logical response?
I love the idea of CC looking at Ocean creatures, maybe a team up with Casual Geographic? He's covered a bunch of the weirdest deep sea ocean dwellers
But why? Guy makes the most incredible basic low effort stuff. Basically everything Corridor doesn´t do.
@@DerAykac I'm a sucker for crossovers of people I follow
The whole episode should’ve been the Patterson gimlin video. There’s so many layers to that
Please do a entire stuntmen react to John Wick Chapter 4! That movie deserves it. It deserves a entire series considering the whole movie is all about the stuntmen and woman. They literally killed it. The different film shots in the movie were perfection.
Harry and the Hendersons probably deserves a brief mention since they did such a convincing job with practical effects over 3 decades ago.
@Rhizosphere Well i don't see why it wouldn't
Convincing to whom?
I want to see the corridor crew make their own cryptid footage with their own original monster! Though it would need a big watermark in the corner saying "THIS IS FAKE" or else it would be shared a million times on facebook lol
also deep sea creature episode yes!
We need a video from you guys making the most convincing paranormal event caught on camera.
Challenge or not.
Lol "come with me out into the field and I will show you a sasquatch".
Honestly, some of the best Bigfoot videos are the Messing With Sasquatch commercials for beef jerky.
Could you imagine being the person that has to report on live television of an obviously fake "big foot" sighting video.
Sometimes they do roll those out for April 1st.
I don’t believe in Bigfoot. But I do want to argue Sams point about being too scared to film a Bigfoot. If people are too scared to film bears, then why do we have smartphone footage of random bear encounters in the wild? 🤔
I wanna see y'all make the most convincing Bigfoot footage
There's been some interesting analysis of the Patterson/Gimlin film that purport to show the creature is outside human body shape in terms of length/proportions/movement of the body structures.
Might deserve a deeper dive. 🤟✌
ABSOLUTELY deserves a deeper dive. Thanks for this post!
@@dsbmitchell ,
You betcha! 👍
@@Darmesis Right on! 😄
They already put Bob Heironimus side by side it is human shaped and it has his gait. They already explained that. It must have went right over your head.
@@vincentwiese8414 Whats goin over your head is you can clearly see muscle mass movement. Explain how that can happen from a suit . No man-made suit even came close to that in 1967.
Love your debunking episodes. Hope to see more.
The first clip was also debunked on 'Penn and Teller's Bullshit' show. It was a biologist or something that pointed out that apes do not swing their arms like that, and it is obviously a man in a costume.. He shortly after called the clip "ridiculous".
With all due respect, I don’t think VFX artists are in a position to critically analyze video evidence such as the PG film that occurred well before any video editing tools / cgi was even a thing.
You guys should compete to see who can make the most realistic bigfoot footage
I would love for u guys to make something like that. A „fake bigfoot sighting“. Could be interesting. :]
That’s their analysis of the Patterson-Gimlin footage?
1. It’s clearly a female, not a “him”. (breasts, wide hips)
2. “The gait is human-like.” It’s a biped yes, but the angle of the legs kicking back is wrong, and the knee thrust is more forward than a human, and without locking. This is a
completely different cycle than a normal human stride.
3. “Not anatomically different than a human.” The ratio of arms to legs to torso is not within normal human proportions.
4. “There’s like a white stripe…at the bottom of his foot.” Have you seen the foot of a chimpanzee? What color is it?
5. Have you done a side-by-side analysis of the Planet of the Apes costumes for this video? The movie had state-of-the-art makeup and custom-made suits that took hours to put on and was probably quite expensive in 1967. Producers were unlikely to sell them since a sequel could always be in the works. There is also the problem of “crotch sag” with a costumes of this era. You can see this in the Six Million Dollar Man episodes featuring Ted Cassidy and Andre the Giant, filmed about 10 years after this video. This is also a reason that Planet of the Apes actors wore clothing over their fur suits: to cover their mid-sections. Lycra had not yet been invented and it was hard to get a snug fit, even for a big-budget Hollywood movie.
Maybe if these guys had gotten up off the couch and put some analysis into it, their opinions might be different.
I always love the comments on these videos. People go crazy when you guys debunk stuff!
How did they debunk the Patterson film ?
Right at the end, Sam said exactly what I was about to comment. The old OG footage looks more convincing than anything else that has ever been presented as a Bigfoot on camera. Nothing even comes close, and that's so disappointing. I'm not saying 100% that it's an impossibility that there could be something out there, but no video has ever come close to convincing me. The most realistic Bigfoot that's ever been filmed is Hary from Hary and the Hendersons. That costume was some of Stan Winston's best work. The hair and the expressive face were amazingly well done and very natural looking. I honestly don't think anybody will ever get as good as that.
Can't wait to see the oceanic cryptid debunk video.
The Corridor guys didn't want to admit it in this video --- but the way they were looking at the Patterson film at the end convinces them it's not a hoax but a real creature!
@@kerzytibok3211
🐴💩 Pull the other one. 🙄
8:15
"You wouldn't be able to hear a gian-Oh my god that is a guy."
Seth Green, Is that you?! lol
You could do something like ''VFX artists debunk megalodon'', or kraken or lochness.
That way you could also talk and teach something about underwater VFX or how editing a clip underwater, that must be sort of different from normal clips right?
Idk, just a random idea. Cool video tho. :)
I would adore a video of u guys explaining and debunking deep sea clips
You guys should do VFX challenge where you guys try to make the most convincing paranormal footage
Big reason the Patterson footage looks as good as it does IS because of the costume. It was made by Phillip Morris (Morris Costumes) I’ve met him and attended a lecture of his about his costume he sold to those guys.
Phillip Morris made very high quality costumes.
So interesting! I wish this was more common knowledge.
@@liiindseyyy It's not true.
Utter rubbish. Morris had nothing to do with the subject on the PGF. He, and Heironimus, are out and out liars.
11:45 “I think someone’s 4 or 5 year old is in a tinier guerrilla costume.” 😂 this had me cracking up
Ive watched this channel since 2018 and it never disappointed me
Haha I love these debunking videos, they always make me laugh
You guys must make your own version. This isn't an idea, this is something that needs to be done
Its always easier said than done and millennials do a lot of saiding.
We need more sea monster debunk
With concerns to the Patterson footage, it’s Been reviewed by both costume designers and biologists and both have said that what the corridor crew said is not possible
Yep over and over again
the muscle movement is human-like and it isn't impossible for a human to walk like that. but that being said, it isn't difficult for a human to replicate the gate of an ape. half of terry notary's career is the replication of apes.
i think to come to a conclussion of wether or not the p/g footage is real or not kind of ruins the americana whimsy of it. i think people should just enjoy it for what it is, not what it might be.
How is it not possible tho? It moves like a human, they even found the dude who walked exactly the same way, and there have been much more impressive costumes in film. And its so blurry that you don't even get a good look at the costume.
@@LordWout It's certainly possible to mimic the walk, sure. Honestly though, why would anyone expect a bipedal ape to be notably taller than a human or walk in a substantially different manner? "Bipedal ape has similar height limitations and gait to other bipedal ape".
@LordWout He was one of several people to claim they were in the suit but could never produce the suit or even accurately describe it.
The proportions and walking of a bi-pedal ape should be expected to be more similar to the other bi-pedal apes than it would be to the quadrupedal apes. We have shorter arms because we don't use them as legs. We have longer legs because we walk upright. The same would be true for bigfoots.
If bigfoot is real as described by legend then it absolutely should look more like a human than it looks like a gorilla. Like they should compare to humans the same way that gorillas compare to chimps. A chimp in a gorilla suit would look way more like a gorilla than any human in a gorilla suit ever could.
really enjoyed the fun and laughter and comradery in this. It made my day! I think the best Bigfoot that all should be compared by is from Harry and the Hendersons, LMAO!
I've seen one back in 2017 in Hagador Watershed in California. It was a transcendent experience. It scrambled my brain and made me question everything.
Would you tell us more about your sighting???
@@Quidisi December 2013 My brother and I had hiked the same canyon for years. We had no flashlights and we were armed with machetes in case a mountain lion or Coyote attacked. He was leading looking down the path looking out for rocks. I was looking ahead and behind. I saw it 100 ft ahead the trail. The outline was exactly like Chewbacca from Star wars. It was covered in white hair/ fur. I refused to believe my eyes. I said nothing. As we got to 50ft I could almost see it's human like face. Suddenly it skittered down to the dry creek bed and up the trail. I asked my brother to stop at the tree where I had seen it standing. My brother says he's had a strong sense of eyes looking at us from the canyon walls. Suddenly we heard rustling in the bushes around us. The warning sound was that of a mastiff's cheeks flapping. We didn't run, we just slowly walked back.
One issue: Nico assumed the Patterson-Gimlin creature has "normal proportions." It does not. Anthropologists have measured the limb ratios and they don't match humans. Basically the arms are too long and the tibia is too short, and that is very hard to fake practically. You can easily make legs longer, but not shorter (we can't move our knees around). Another fact worth considering, it was shot at the very END of a reel of film. The first part was full of B-roll from them riding around the forest for days. Which means if you assume it's fake, they had ONE TAKE to get this footage. Consider the difficulty of getting a very large man and very advanced, expensive suit (for 1967) deep into the California wilderness, and then getting a perfect first take, no stumbles or slips of any kind in the bulky suit. I'm not convinced either way but it's interesting