10x42 vs 10x50 Binoculars - Which is Best?
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 09. 2019
- In this video, I cover the main differences between similar quality 10x42 and 10x50 binoculars to help you decide which configuration is best for your particular needs and preferences.
📒Links From The Video:
➡️BBR Web Version: 10x42 vs 10x50 Binoculars:
www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
➡️Kite Lynx HD+ 10x50 Binoculars Review
www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
➡️What do binocular numbers mean?
www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
➡️Exit Pupil - The Complete Guide
www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
Having just finished completed testing and reviewing these excellent Kite Lynx HD+ 10x50 binoculars, it reminded me how for some uses combining slightly larger 50mm lenses with a 10x magnification can certainly make a better choice than the default option of a 10x42 binocular, yet it is hardly ever considered and won't be for everyone.
So in this video, I go over the main differences in both the physical aspects and the optical performance of a 10x42 vs 10x50 binocular which in turn should help you to decide which of these two specific configurations is best suited for your specific needs.
Examples of the subjects I cover:
Size
It stands to reason that in order to accommodate the larger objective lenses, the barrels on a 50mm binocular need to be larger than those on a 42mm one. This has a bearing on the instruments overall dimensions and thus most 10x50 binoculars tend to be greater in size than 10x42s.
Theoretical Optical Differences
1. Just as the large windows in your house are able to let in more light than small ones, the larger surface area of these 50mm lenses means that they have the potential to “capture” more light than 42mm ones.
More light means more information and thus if all else is equal, there is the potential for brighter, better quality views through 10x50 binoculars versus 10x42 binoculars.... and much more.
👍 99% of viewers don't show their love! Leave a like or subscribe to support and help me continue to bring you more content in the future
✅Subscribe for more Binocular Reviews, Tips, and Advice: czcams.com/users/BestBino...
✅Share this video with a friend:
• 10x42 vs 10x50 Binocul...
✅Support BBR: Patreon
/ bestbinocularsreviews
➡️Watch next - 3 Worst Mistakes Beginners Make using Binoculars & How to Avoid Them:
• 3 Worst Mistakes Begin...
➡️Recommended Playlist - Binoculars 101 🔴
• Binoculars 101 🔴
📒Equipment I Use:📒
➡️Microphone: Shure MV51 www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
➡️Lighting: Fovitec StudioPRO www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
➡️Tripod: Vanguard ABEO Pro 283CGH & GH-300T Pistol Grip www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
➡️Camera: Fujifilm Finepix HS50 www.bestbinocularsreviews.com...
📒100% Honest, Real Reviews, Advice & Opinions📒
I would like to make it completely clear that like all the reviews and advice that I give on the BBR video channel and website, this is my honest and completely genuine opinion and I am in no way compensated to describe a binocular in a particular way or with a bias.
In other words, if I think a binocular or a feature on it is great, I will say so. If I think it is rubbish or it is weak in certain areas, I will also point them out.
Before writing and publishing any binocular review, I thoroughly research, test and use the instrument in my office as well as out in the field. I also conduct comprehensive comparisons between the binocular under review with a number of benchmark binoculars in both good and bad light conditions.
Whilst I make every effort not to, I do make the occasional error or am sometimes supplied with the wrong details. If you spot any mistakes, please feel free to contact me either in the comments section, via social media or on my site, so that I can rectify it/them.
As always, I love getting feedback and your opinions. it is these that help me improve and continue to supply you with content, advice, and reviews that you actually want to watch. - Sport
I would like to see pictures taken through the ocular of both instruments with the same settings for exposure. This way we can better compare the capabilities of binoculars.
Hi yes, it is a good idea, and perhaps will make that for a future video, thanks.
Second this request. Would really put things into perspective. Please also try taking pictures during dim light conditions, would love to see how much of a difference a 10×50 makes.
Hi there - I hear you guys and I am working on it - the problem always is that the limitations of a camera, which always means the view you see when looking through the binoculars with your eyes is not represented by a camera looking through one lens of a binocular
Very informative! Especially the part about the exit pupil, which is the first time I saw it explained in a review although it makes a lot of (crucial) sense.
Great video. good to see the a video with the new Kite Lynx
Exit pupil explanation was solid! Really helped me understand the concept clearly. Thank you.
Hi Rassi - Really glad to have helped and many thanks for the feedback - it is much appreciated.
So glad I found you. This really helps me. 10x50 for dusk and early morning.
Glad to be found! 😜 and yes exactly, a 10x50 is a good option for achieving more detail than a 8x bino and certainly better than a 10x42 at dusk and early morning
Tremenda información! Agradecido de que expongas tanto detalle, me ha servido mucho :)
Saludos desde tierras Pehuenches :D
Well presented, good clear, and to the point. Thank you
Hi David, many thanks for the feedback it is very much appreciated.
Great video. THank you, for your clear explanations.
You are most welcome and thanks very much for the feedback, it is much appreciated
Thank you! This video was very helpful in making my choice of binoculars, a perfect explanation in the differences between the two sizes. The 10 x 42 will work perfectly for me and I am happy to be able to go for the lighter weight option. Keep up the great work.
Hi Charis, Glad to be of help and thanks for the feedback , I very much appreciate it.
very informative. Thank you.
I like how you always pick a winner in your videos, unlike some other youtube channels.
I just finished watching this, and also your 10x42 vs 8x42 video. Both are excellent. In fact, I usually dive into a bunch of vids on a topic, but this time I decided your videos are more than enough. Saved me a lot of time 🙂
The stupid thing is, I already ordered a pair of 10x50 *before* doing my research, which is something I usually never do. Got caught up in excitement and a good offer. Fortunately, I will use it for both astronomy and backyard bird watching, so I guess it’ll work out (haven’t received them yet). But now that I’ve seen your vids, I think I want an 8x42 just to have a more rounded arsenal 😅 The 10x50 weighs 1 Kg so it’ll be hard to carry on hikes (which I seldom do, but still). Cheers!
Hi Levi - sorry for the delayed response, but thanks for the feedback and sorry this video did not get to you sooner! Anyway it gives you an excuse to perhaps also get an 8x42 in the future :-)
@@Bestbinocularsreviews really appreciate your reply. Yes, there are few things better than having an excuse to buy more gear. But for now, I am enjoying the 10x50. I saw a satellite again, after probably more than a decade. Must be the light pollution, plus my poorer eyesight, but I used to be able to find satellites in the night sky with just my naked eyes. Anyways, thanks again for sharing your love and knowledge of binoculars. 🙂
excellent explanation, very useful info. Thank you!
Hi Marco, Glad it was helpful and thanks for the feedback - much appreciated.
Very informative. Thank you!
Thanks for the kind words and the feedback - it is Much appreciated, and I am glad to know I was of help. All the best.
Very helpful video. I go with the 10x42 as it's lighter to carry around my neck on hikes and when birdwatching.
Your explanations are very useful and technical, something that really weighs on the decision to buy one, however, we want to see it in use showing the comparative field of vision between one and the other
Hi, thanks for the comments and yes, you are 100% right and I am currently working on it by getting better at digibining.. So in the future, i do plan on making visual comparisons
Great video! Liked and subbed.
Hi Robert, Thank you - It is very much appreciated and welcome aboard!
The exit pupil info was very informative, I never considered it
Excellent! Glad to be of help! Thanks for the comment
Very helpful thanks
Para astronomía y ver paisajes de día es mejor 10×50 ese sirve para todo uso solo que pesa poco más que 10×42 pero es mejor 10×50
Great explanation. Thanks
Glad it was helpful and thanks very much for the feedback - much appreciated 👍😀
Awesome 👏
well explained 👍👍👍 watching from the Philippines
Awesome, thank you for the comment and sorry for the late reply, but I have been away
well explained 👍🏽
Hi Akalanka, many thanks for the feedback, it is much appreciated.
Great video. Question: What is your absolute favorite pair of binoculars or favorite binocular configuration?
Hi there - firstly sorry for the huge delay in replying - your comment slipped through the net. Anyway, it is very much horses for courses for me and thus my favorite configuration depends on what I am mostly sing the binocular for. But If I could only pick one and wanted an all rounder, then I'd probably go for an 8x42 or perhaps an 8x32 if I traveled about a lot...
Thank you for a very informative session. Can you please review recording binoculars like the binox 4k by ATN optics
Hi, I have made a number of reviews of Digital Night vision devices including binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/night-vision/ - unfortunately not had the chance to use ATN device yet tho 🙄
Is Leupold bx4 10x42 better than a Vortex Viper 10x50? My interest will be for some birds,animals or Foot ball games
I am comparing the GPO Passion ED 10x42 binocular with the Vortex Viper HD 10x50 binocular. Interestingly enough, the Viper has a slightly larger field of view at 346 ft vs 340 ft for the GPO. The eye relief is 16mm for both. The Viper is only 2 ounces (50 grams) heavier than the GPO.
Without considering price, what is your opinion on which of these to get? I’m looking for an all around 10x binocular for general use (birdwatching, moon and stargazing, etc. ). Thanks!
Hi, it is really hard for me to be certain and offer you a definite answer as I have not tested the Vortex Viper HD 10x50 and I do not know your exact needs and preferences - as they say, "one man's meat is another man's poison" - and which is best for you will depend on many factors. I can say that the Viper HD range for Vortex has a good reputation as being a great value for money instrument and as you can see in my review of the GPO Passion ED - I thought they were truly outstanding: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/GPO8x42PassionED-235.htm
Man I really love your review! One question: would you ever go for a 12x50 bino for general observation and birdwatching? I tried them on field and I don’t see much steadiness issue compared to a 10x50, and the quality of the image looks gorgeous! What do you think?
Sure, some people can hold 12x steady enough and prefer the greater image detail and further reach that you get from a higher power, so as long as you also understand the shortcomings ie: less performance in low light and a narrower field of view being the main ones and you are happy with the trade-off then I would suggest you go with what suits you and your specific needs best - let me know which you choose and how they work out when you do.
Almost forgot, I have tested a number of 12x binoculars including a few 12x50's that are some of my all-time favorites that may interest you, take a look and let me know what you think: tinyurl.com/12x50binoculars
Best Binocular Reviews thanks a lot man! Gonna have a look and let you know ASAP :) :)
Namaskar Jason!
I'm quite impressed from your honest work. I want to ask you that I have selected Bushnell 10x50 as my first binocular. I am getting it in 40$ . Would it be right choice for me?
It would be great if you suggest your views. Thanks!
Hi, thanks for the kind words. It is hard for me to say if it will be right choice for you , as I don't know what you want to use your binoculars for. One thing I will say about Bushnell: They make some excellent binoculars... but they also put their name on some pretty bad ones too, especially at the cheaper end of the market. So just be aware and if you do have a tight budget, here is some advice and some that I have tested in all price ranges and would recommend: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/by-price/
@@Bestbinocularsreviews okay
Thanks Jason!!!
Going through the article!
Love the way you think $200 is just a BIT more expensive! lol
Keep -em comin', buddy!!!
Hi, Yeagh that first one was probably not the best example, but if you shop around there are many 10x50's that come much closer in price to the 10x42 alternative
Bushnell Falcon 10x50 Wide Angle Binoculars
Please make a video detailed review of this binoculars as there is not one and tell me is it a good choice are lenses multi coated and are they bak4 or bk 7
Hello, I need to decide between Nikon Aculon 10*42 vs Nikon Aculon 10*50 for stargazing. For 10*42 always saying for birding, does it work for astronomy too?
Hi, yes whilst not the ideal configuration, you can most certainly use a 10x42 for astronomy - it is far better than nothing in terms of just how many more stars you will be able to see. for handheld use and just browsing the night sky, for me the field of view tends to be a little narrow, but as I say you will see far more stars and views of the moon can be pretty good as well. I have quite a few articles on hand-held (smaller binoculars) for astronomy here www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/astronomy/
Very good.thanks
Welcome 😊 and thanks for the feedback - much appreciated
I was hoping to hear about which binocular provide better stability when held by hand.
Hi thanks for the question - I did not include that because as both configurations have the same 10x magnification, they are also pretty much the same when it comes to image shake. However, you got me thinking about it a little more and as the 10x50 is a little larger and heavier, for some people (perhaps those with particularly unsteady hands) it may just be a little harder to keep still, but for me this has never been a noticeable difference between the two. Hope this helps.
Hi...which one do you prefer between 8x42 vs 10x50 for landscape viewing eg hillside / beach / top of high building
Hi, at longer distances, and out in the open, the 10x50 would be a better choice between the two.
In daylight there would not have a huge diference.
Great video, do you recommend a 10x50 or a 12x60 for night sky? Thanks in advance!
Hi, thanks for the question: assuming the level of optics are equal, either would be fine Both have a 5mm exit pupil (www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/exit-pupil-06/) and so in theory a similar low light performance - with the 10x50 you will get a wider view of the night sky and be able to take in more at once, whilst with the 12x60 you will get a fraction more detail/perhaps see a few more distant/less bright stars.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews thank you very much for your quick response. Yes, the level of the optics is the same. I also think the 10×50 FOV is wider but perhaps the '60' mm of apperture in the 12x make it more 'bright' specialy under low light conditions?
They say that the 12x is also more 'shaky' , so 🤔...
Hi, If you don't plan on using a tripod, I would probably suggest the 10x50 as the better choice. I can use a 12x50 from the hands, but only for very short periods.
Hi, for sky gazing without a tripod, do you have a budget recommendation - size and brand?
Hi Mark - It is hard to say as it depends on what you want - wider views or a little more detail. But I would definitely keep the magnification down. a 7x50 is great for wide views of the stars and let in plenty of light and are a popular choice. I have a bunch of information and recommendations on mt astro section on BBR: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/astronomy/
Nikon Aculon or Action Extremes 10X50.. Bellow 200usd.
Amazing video. I need a binoculars for plane spotting be it a take off or landing. Would 10*50 a good option. Please suggest.
Hi, thanks for the kind words and yes, depending on how close you are, I do think a 10x50 would make a good option for plane spotting. Although if you do this in mostly good weather, you may consider a 10x42 which ould be a bit more lightweight and thus easier on your arms. Also if you are a bit further away you may consider a higher power, something like a 12x50 > this will give you more detail, but a narrower field of view, take a look at this page for recommendations www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/best-high-powered-binoculars-for-hunting-12/
I also have a page specifically on plane spotting which I also suggest you take a look at www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/aircraft-aeroplane-spotting-binoculars.php
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thank You so much. I am from India and the weather is too good and sunny here. And often landing of the planes is over the sea shore which is close to my house. Keeping that in mind 10by50 fulfill my need.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews will check it out. Thanks.
If you'll use the binoculars in low light conditions, 10x50 makes more sense. No matter what you'll get, a tripod is a must I think, for 10x or more. You can snap the binoculars on it when not used or when you need a stable image. For bigger magnifications, you may consider a monopod, the image jumps too much to make that instrument useable if you want to keep it only with your hands. If you get visible chromatic aberrations, then you just threw a lot of money for a junk (that's why I suggested pictures seen through the oculars). I use binoculars for astronomy.
Nice video!! Would you get an 10x50 bak7 porro or 10x42 bak4 roof. I pretent to use mostly in astronomy.
Hi, thanks for the question - for binoculars - bak-4 glass is almost always considered to be a better option and bk7 is only used in really cheap binoculars. More info here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/glossary-binoculars.php#bak4
Astronomy is porros fieldom...you have to pay 2 or 3 times the money to get the same performance from a roof (Abbe Koening) that a Porro. Right now the Nikon AEx 10X50 dominate the low end and the Fujis FMT-SX the high end.
Also the Nikon Prostars and Astroluxes.. Very high end...but to get a similiar performance from a roof you will have to buy 3K Alpha brand roof.
Hey, what brands of 10x50 binoculars are recommended for stargazing?
Hi Sanjay - Thanks for the comment. Whilst brands like Celestron and Orion are associated with Astronomy, in theory and good quality 10x50 will be as effective, no matter what brand it is. It comes down to more about your budget and the level of optics that you choose. Here are some that I have tested and reviewed tinyurl.com/10x50binos - some of which I would highly recommend - hope this helps
The power of analogies. "Just like a larger window let's more light into your house..."
Hi I'm looking for a binocular which is good for watching sky, moon etc and landscape, birds.
I'm thinking to go for Olympus 10×50
What do you think, and also i wanna take pictures of moon by the help phone through this
Please suggest
Yes, a 10x50 is a good configuration for a wide range of uses and with the extra light gathering and larger exit pupil, a 10x50 will better than a 10x42 for 'digibinning' (taking [photos through a binocular).
@@Bestbinocularsreviews thanks man
Hi! I have a question, will I still see better in difficult light conditions (dawn/dusk) with 10x50 binoculars with a slightly worse light transmission than 10x42?
Hi Marcin, thanks for the question - it is tough to say without comparing the exact models you are referring to and what you mean by "slightly worse" - speaking generally, I would probably usually opt for a higher quality 10x42 over a lesser quality 10x50 as you will get many other benefits other than just low light performance from better quality optics. I hope this helps.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thanks for the answer :) this is the advice I wanted. When it comes to exact models, I consider buying a bushnell forge 10x42 or a leupold bx-2 alpine 10x52 (mainly for hunting). Maybe you could advise which one to choose?
@@marcinkowalczyk7101 Hi - it is hard for me to say with any authority as I have not tested or reviewed either - I would advise taking a close look at their stats and features and then selecting the ones that most closely match your needs - I explain how I do this here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/
Great to know how the plants and the night sky can be seen by each one.
What I got out of this video is that I need both!
The sad thing is there is no binocular that can do everything well, thus if you have varied uses and interests and want the best option for each occasion, more than one binocular may be necessary. However you can in many cases get away with a good all-round binocular which may not be the ultimate ideal choice in every situation, but it will be good enough and certainly better than nothing at all. This is why 8x42 and 10x42 binoculas are so popular as they in many cases fulfill this need.
Thanks for the vid, now I'm a very well informed confused individual 🤔
Hi Mickey, your welcome - but also if you are still confused, let me know what your specific needs are and I will see if I cant help you become less confused :-)
Hi...I want to buy a high zooming binocular, but my budget 120$ and I want to carry with me always. Which model is best for me? Please advice me to choose a best binocular. Thanks...
Hi thanks for the question, take a look at my guide to High Powered, Long Distance Viewing Binoculars - it has a bunch of info and recommendations for all budgets: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/high-powered-long-distance-viewing-binoculars.php
I'm looking at buying a new nikon prostaff 5s would you buy the 10x42 or 10x50 or would you go to the prostaff 7s 10x42 the reason is I've used a pair of 5s 10x45 and liked them but on the fence of going to 50s or the 7s as a upgrade?
Hi Marc, hard for me to say as Nikon has never been responsive to my requests for test samples, so I have not tested either. If I was you and adamant that I only wanted a Nikon, then, I would compare their stats and features and then from there, compare their relitive strengths against my preferences - I explain how I do it here How to Choose Between Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/
@@Bestbinocularsreviews ok thank you, would you go 10x45 or 10x50? I want them for hunting bird watching and general use morning day and evening cheers, what would you recommend under £200? Sorry for all the questions I just want the best for my budget and use
@@marcross3197 It basically comes down to low light performance vs size and weight: If the extra size and weight is not an issue, then the 10x50 will be better in low light. Also, unless you need the extra image detail you could go with an 8x instead - this will ensure an even better low light performance and a wider field of view, which at closer ranges I find to be a real advantage. Dor more take a look at my article and video on 8x42 vs 10x42 Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/8x42-vs-10x42-binoculars-10/ - it is not an 8x45 or 8x50, but will give the idea of what advantages an 8x has over 10x
Hello, I write from Argentina. I am using a translator. I want to buy a binocular that will serve me for all uses, both to go to the park with my daughters and to see the planets and galaxies. in my country these 2 models are sold (8x42 10x42 10x50): bushnell engage x and celestron nature dx. Could you please tell me which model between the two should I buy and to what extent? thank you!
hola saludos desde medellin podrias hablar de los bushnell
Nice
Please make a review about Baigish Russian Binoculars
Thanks for the Video! Does 10X42 or 10X50 male any difference in keeping the binocular steady(less shaky)?
Hi Joerg, no not anything major, but a 50mm binocular is likely to be a bit bigger and heavier than a 42mm one - for some (usually bigger, stronger people with large hands) this actually helps a fraction, but for smaller people it will be a little more difficult to hold. but both have the same 10x magnification so no change there.
Jason , I wanted to ask you which type of binocular would be good for my situation . I actually want to see someone's room who lives right next to my apartment and her room is 30 to. 40meter away from me . I want to ask which magnification binoculars would be ideal ? I've already chose the model it's Nikon action Extreme , but I'm not sure should I go for 8x40 or 10x50 . Can you please help me out . Also is there any difference between aculon and action version in image quality ?? Because I saw their specs both r multicoated , but action is Waterproof
Plz advice best binocular to view Snow mountains from distance. Ie view Mount Everest from 200 km distance
Hi Prem - take a look at my page on Long Range Binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/high-powered-long-distance-viewing-binoculars.php I have a number of recommendations on there in a variety of price ranges, which I hope will help you - let me know if you need any further advice.
Hallo, it a great video.
I am also looking for my father a binocular for the purpose of having good view of mountain s and hills with a very clean and bright view with almost in 200 euros
Which one will you recommend.
Thank you.
Hi Rajiv, thanks for the kind words and the comment. I would probably go for the 10x42 is the light is generally good as it would be easier for your father to hold (not sure of his age) I have created a selection of 10x42's and 10x50's in your price range that I have tested for you to look at here: preview.tinyurl.com/10x42and10x50under300 of those, it is the Bresser Condor 10x42 that really stands out for me and I have no hesitation in recommending it to you: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Bresser-Condor-10x42-Binoculars-Review-240.htm - hope this helps.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thank you so much.
Namaste. 🙏
@@rajivkaji You are welcome - please let me know if you need any further assistance.
Thank you for your reply.
I am interested Bresser condor10*50. I have seen in your video the difference between 10*40 and 10*50
Does it really worth for far distance to see hills and mountains clear and near. My father is almost 65 years old and he loves binocular. This is a gift to him.
Today I am going to buy online.
Just waiting your response.
Thank you 🙏
I want to use the binoculars for star gazing, to see the moon, planets etc
, therefore, i assume that a 10×50 wii donit for me? thanks. Very informative video though
Hi there, a 10x50 is not at all bad for stargazing and is great for getting some nice views of the moon for sure. What you should get depends on what you want or expect to see in the night sky, many astronomers use a low powered 7x50 to get wide views of the night sky and then a high powered binocular for closer study. Binoculars are also used in combination with telescopes - I have a bunch of info on all this in my astronomy section: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/astronomy/
Are the 50mm more likely to suffer from Chromatic Aberration in full sun bright conditions, ceteris paribus?
Hi Matt, interesting question! When comparing like for like - so the same brand in the same series, the larger 50mm version is to my eyes no different to the 42mm version in terms of the amount of color fringing I see. To my knowledge, it is just the magnification that emphasizes the color fringing that you see in the image which is the result of Chromatic Aberrations that come as a result of the light passing through the lens elements in the lenses. Here I think it is just the quality and make-up of these glass elements that influence the amount of chromatic aberration and not their diameter. So as long as they use the same glass and make-up it will be the same. Having said that I am not 100% sure if for example, a 50mm lenses use slightly thicker lens elements than a 42mm one, which could alter the level of aberrations. However, whatever the case.. I have never noticed a difference that was enough for me and my eyes to be aware of it.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews thanks for the reply! I ask because I've heard of people stopping down their aperture in bright sun conditions to reduce CA.
So would you say a 10x42 would be more likely to have CA than an 8x42 of the same series? Looking at Zeiss Conquest HD and I want a 42mm objective. Leaning towards 8x.
@@MattH-wg7ou Hi Matt - In the way that I understand it and how it all works: technically I don't think it necessarily "has more" or any worse levels of chromatic aberration as both the 8x42 and 10x42's from the same series will use the same objective lenses, but as the image that you see gets magnified after leaving the eyepieces, it also magnifies any issues and as such there is the possibility that the amount of color fringing you see becomes more obvious on the more magnified image.
I'm wondering if I should buy Bushnell 12x24 Bak4 or Tasco 10-30x50 Bk7? please help!
Hi Juan, It is impossible for me to say unless you tell me more, like what your intended use is for them. However, as a general rule, I really do try and persuade people from purchasing cheap zoom binoculars and also stay away from high powered compacts, both your choices are red flags to me - I highly recommend you take a look at my binoculars 101 section: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/guides/ - especially take a look at the videos on the biggest mistakes to avoid as a newbie as I go over why your choices maybe a bad idea..
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Hello Yes, I read your blog! and as I'm new in this binocular world, I haven't tried a lot to be honest. I have one Tasco 8x21 Sonoma, and they are amazing, but I wanted to upgrade a bit the magnification and since I know Tasco is a very professional brand, I've bought them (10-30x50) and also because they are new and in a great discount price. So I'm gonna try those and see what happens! I can be right or wrong. Just trying them will let me know and I will learn from the experience. If they they are not so good quality or not as I expected, I can sell them and the next time I can invest in other characteristics. Anyways thanks for your reply and help!
Avoid zooming binoculars like the plague.
Hi
I'm lost in a sea of binocular choice!
I have a home directly on the coast of the northern Atlantic. In the market for a decent set of binos that will be mounted on a tripod and dedicated to whale watching from a fixed position in our home. Could you suggest me a set that would match this application? It would be very much appreciated!!
Hi Matthew, thanks for the question. So basically you are looking for a High Powered, Long Range Binocular: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/high-powered-long-distance-viewing-binoculars.php It just depends on how much power you need depending on the range you are mostly looking at and what sort of image detail you require (But remember More is certainly not always better) and then also important to know is what kind of budget you have. Very cheap, Very high Power binoculars are almost always also very bad! Depending on your budget something like the Maven B5 18x56 Binoculars that I recently tested (www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Maven-B5-18x56-Binoculars-Review-263.htm) could be perfect. Not sure if you have a tripod setup yet - but I have just recently written an article with a video with some advice based on my setup: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/my-best-tripod-for-binoculars-astronomy-terrestrial-surveillance-04/
Thanks for the reply! Your site and vids have been super helpful, really appreciate all the work you put in! To be more precise, I'm on a bay of the north Atlantic that is 14 klms across (not open ocean). I ended up ordering a pair of Carson RD 8x42s with tripod adapter. Will use them from a fixed seated position via tripod for daily whale watching but I also hunt and hike so they will serve double purpose when I need to take them out in the field. I'm hoping that for 6-10 klms high light daytime viewing from an elevated position (I'm on a cliff high above the bay) they will be just strong enough to work for that application while also serving my hunting/hiking needs when required. Do you think I'll get away with those binos working in that context? I can still cancel my order, let me know if you think I've really messed up! Thanks again!!!
You can certainly use an 8x42 and you will get a wide view and good low light images, but I personally would have opted for a higher magnification to get a little more detail at distance, the down side would be narrower field, lower performance in low light and more image shake, but as you are mounting on a tripod, this is not an issue.
Truth be told, there would be days that many people would see no difference.
There would also be days when there would be a slight difference, at least in the opinion of some users.
Hi Ernie, yes, you are right: as long as the quality of the optics is the same or very similar, in good light conditions, the difference can be hard and even impossible to notice
Enjoyed the reviews have you done a review on a 10x42 versus 10x50 monocular which one would you recommend
Hi Michael, thanks for the comment and kind words - much appreciated. The relative strengths and weaknesses between a 10x42 versus 10x50 monocular will essentially be the same as that between binoculars of the same configurations.
I have a x28 and x50 binoculars. TBH I can't tell any difference in image quality. I think our eyes can adjust accordingly, the bigger object lens in my opinion is overrated in most cases except the twilight.
Ordered a set of steiner Military Marine 10x50 hope they dont disappoint
Oggh nice - hope they did not disappoint you? Ps: Sorry for the late reply, but I have been away.
Im evry happy with my 7x50 MM Steiners for 21 years..
Please correct: better. The question which is better depends mostly on the purpose each is used for.
Thoughts on Hawke Nature-Trek binoculars?
Hi, I have a couple of full reviews on Nature-Trek binoculars on BBR as ell as many other of Hawke's binos: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-brand-Hawke-Binoculars.html
@@Bestbinocularsreviews brill, thanks
Can i use this to watch the night sky? I want to buy ones to watch the moon and some stars
Hi, yes both can be used for astro, but because of their larger objective lenses the 10x50 configuration would be a better option if size is not an issue for you. 10x50 is a popular configuration for hand held binocular astronomy, but also a 7x50. more info here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/astronomy/
@@Bestbinocularsreviews thank you so much i appreciate it :')
I like the 50mm in 10 magnification because the extra weight makes it easier to hold steady.
This is most definitely a good point - also another reason why I often prefer a magnesium housing over plastic ones. They just give you a better balance and the extra weight just dampens down the jittery movement.
Well that’s strange because I find that the heavier they are the harder they are to hold steady but then again I do have small hands
Also many quailty 10X50 come tripod ready since.10X50 are astronomy darlings right now.
Levenhuk Sherman Base 12×50 !!! 🥸🤓😁👍
10x50 vs 20x50. which one is better? which one shows more far away?
Which is better? It depends on your needs and what you want o use them for. You can view things like galaxies that are millions of light-years away with both binoculars, so both can "show" objects very far away 😜but what I think you mean is the 20x50 will show objects at distance in more detail. However, their low light performance, image shake, and field of view will be reduced. If you are unsure - be sure to check my article and video on What Binocular Numbers Mean www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/binocular-numbers-mean-12/ and How Different Configurations Affect a Binocular www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/how-different-configurations-affect-a-binocular-04/
For a 20x 50 ypu will need a tripod..a 20x80 will be a far better choice for a 20x.
A 10 x 25 binoculars are good for astronomy??
Hi Drew, whist certainly better than nothing, the 10x25 configuration is certainly far from ideal for astronomy. The 25mm lenses are just too small to take in what little light there is, so ideally you would want a binocular with larger lenses. 42mm, 50mm.. all the way up to 100mm - The down side is the binocular gets bigger and heavier, so you need to decide on your needs and preferences and make a compromise somewhere. However when out hiking and lightweight camping, I have often used my compact binoculars like a 10x25 for looking at the sky at night. Take a look at my section on astronomy which should help: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/astronomy/
@@Bestbinocularsreviews i have question sir .. About sakura 30 x 60 binocular it is really 30x magnification???which i doubt
@@drewgarcia9823 Hi, It is possible I guess, but I am doubtful. And even if it is true, the view will likely be not great and with a 2mm exit pupil, very dull in all but very bright light conditions - more info here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/exit-pupil-06/
In 2024 is 10*50 still a good buy or there is another company's bino doing a better job than it . Please do share as soon as someone can.
Thanks:)
Yes, 10x50's still make a good option for certain uses and users for sure in 2024! :-)
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thanks a lot for replying. Would you guide me a little more please, I'll be grateful. I am planning to buy Crossfire 10*50 as it claims to be okayish useful for both wildlife n slightly for space view (aware it can't beat dedicated ones). It's hard to find a genuine seller, I've found one for Vortex crossfire and Kenko Mirage 10*50 who imports from authorised dealers so don't want to end up using first(n) copy of something else. Do you think it's okay choice?
I want to use it for:
1. Wildlife, birds
2. Observe the sky at night or big planetary events or transition (safe for eyes)
Budget is around $260 if I can get best features which wld last my lifetime, kidding :)
Hello - sorry for the slight delay in replying - I missed it in the comments. Anyway, yes I think a 10x50 is a good configuration for your requirements (wildlife, birding and night sky observation) so this is a good option. Also Consider: If you want wider views and an even better low light performance as well as a more steady view (which is important, especially when looking up at the stars for long periods without a tripod), you could get a 8x50 or 7x50 binocular, but then on the downside you will loose some image detail.
You have a good budget and I think as long as you are carful, you can get a good set that if you look after, can last you a lifetime :-)
I can't comment too much on the Vortex crossfire, as I have not tested it myself, but if you take a look at all the Vortex binoculars I have tested: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-brand-Vortex-Binoculars.html - you can see that in general I think they offer a very good performance within their price range - my review of the Vortex Diamondback HD 15x56 www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Vortex-Diamondback-HD-15x56-Binoculars-Review-270.htm may be of particular interest - not that I think you should go for a 15x56, but because the 10x50 Diamandback HD is I think within budget and at a higher level than the Crossfire.
Also check out the 50mm Hawke Endurance ED models, I have tested the 7x50, 7x32 (marine versions) 8x42 and 8x32 versions : www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-brand-Hawke-Binoculars.html - and without exception they always perform well above what i would expect at this price level
Another binocular that springs to mind is the Athlon Midas - I have tested the 12x50 version www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/AthlonMidas12x50BinocularsReview-247.htm , and found it to be excellent for the price which i think now falls within your budget.
Hope this helps. Jason
Hi - just to let you know I have also written a more comprehensive answer for you on my blog: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/10x50-binoculars-for-birding-wildlife-astronomy-under-260-04/
Can you please do a comparison of 10x50 vs 16x50?
Hi, I will try as it would be interesting - but at the moment I have a bunch of video reviews waiting for me to get to first.
@@Bestbinocularsreviews oh thanks man.
great vid ..but with your accent i could not get the deck guy out my head hahaha
Thanks...I think...I'm not sure who the deck guy is? 😕
Which is better "Carl Zeiss" or "Kite Optics"???
Hi.. that is rather a broad question .. kind of like saying what is better, Mercedes or Volvo.... it all depends on what models you are referring to, the configuration within that model, what you plan on using them for, and who is using them, their budget and expectations... I do however have a general overview of the major binocular brands and their typical strengths and weaknesses here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-brand-is-best-for-binoculars-10/
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thank you!!!
powerful binoculars chew your arms to pieces and fatigue sets in making them unusable, why doesnt someone come up with powerful binoculars that are also lightweight?
Glass is heavy, so larger more powerful binoculars are always going to be more heavy. they also need sturdy bodies to ensure nothing goes out of alignment . Anyway you should really use powerful binoculars with a tripod to get the best results. More details on why and my recommendations here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/my-best-tripod-for-binoculars-astronomy-terrestrial-surveillance-04/
Well done and informative.
BTW, get yourself a GIBSON!
Thanks for the kind words, much appreciated and yes.... a Gibson will be mine.. one day! :-)
Better
seeing is believing what do you think
What about FOV?
Hi Hazcat, as they are both the same magnification (10x in this case), generally the fields of view will be the same or pretty close and so not a factor - perhaps I should have noted that in the video - sorry my bad! - I will try to remember this in the future. 👍
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thanks, I thought the objective lens size difference would have more of an effect on that.
12x50
Like! )
Thanks!
They aren’t even the same line binoculars so how can you compare weight?
Hi, this video is all about in general terms and thus in general most 10x50 binoculars are heavier and bigger than an equivalent 10x42.
Optically speaking, 10x50 is best because of bigger objective lens.
Yes, but larger lenses also have their drawbacks, meaning they may not be right for every use or person.
eox555, not necessarily. The larger amount of light gathered means the overall design of the internal optical lenses must be of a higher quality, and thus more expense. Also, many manufacturers try to save cost by reusing the backend lens from smaller binoculars, this can led to a shorter "eye relief" so that with more powerful glasses the full width of the viewing field many not be available - this will be particularly noticeable to eyeglass wearers.
Great answer and thanks for the insight. 👍
South African?
Close! I am actually from Zimbabwe but have spent some time working as a guide in SA. Form your user name, I'm guessing you are South African though? 😜 If you are interested there is more about me and how and why I set up BBR here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/about.php
@@Bestbinocularsreviews zimbabwe? holy shit thats the death zone for white people
@@djizzah Don't believe everything you read in the media - Yes, like every country, Zim has its problems and there are major issues for sure, but the majority of Zimbabweans, no matter their color are amongst the friendliest bunch people you will ever meet and I am proud to be a Zimbo 😜👍
@@Bestbinocularsreviews Love your reviews, detailed insights, & your website. Thanks for helping us!
P.S. - I was born in Bulawayo, back in the Rhodesia days. Now live in USA. Would probably still be there or Ndola, Zambia if not for ZANU-PF & madman Mugabe.
10x50 is definitely better
Um yes, sometimes, but not all the times and not for everyone
Your only fault is that you speak too fast and I find it hard to understand !!!
So I’m looking for a cheap pair of binoculars that I can see planets 🪐 and stars with. What would be the best size for me? Also they need to be small to fit in my check bag cause I want to travel with them.
Nikon Aculon a 211 16×50 ??? Pentax Júpiter 16×50 ??? Qual a melhor compra ??? Na questão do preço, o Pentax Júpiter tem menor preço. 🤔🧐🙄🥸