The Myth of "Environmental Sustainability" | Justin Mog | TEDxUofL

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
  • It may be that we live in an age of hyper-connectivity and “big data,” but I contend that the fundamental reason why we’ve managed to construct the most highly unsustainable culture the Earth has ever seen is precisely because we have not been taught to see the connections.
    Justin Mog is assistant to the provost for sustainability initiatives, a post created in 2009 to coordinate efforts to advance environmental, social and economic responsibility at the University of Louisville. Dr. Mog served with the Peace Corps in Paraguay for three years before coming to UofL in 2009. He also has worked as an environmental educator at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and has conducted research on sustainable rural development as a Fulbright Scholar in the Philippines.
    This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at ted.com/tedx

Komentáře • 93

  • @christopherm5958
    @christopherm5958 Před 5 lety +40

    There is still a huge carbon footprint building that electric car, disposing of the plastics after it's junked. Also buying the newest model every year. One could go on and on. The problem is human greed.

    • @Jason-wm5qe
      @Jason-wm5qe Před 4 lety +7

      The problem is human consumption in general, and it's unstoppable.

    • @wadeinn463
      @wadeinn463 Před 4 lety +5

      Jason ... over population

    • @mandarkokate5613
      @mandarkokate5613 Před 3 lety

      yes material consumption is problem

    • @jakesilv
      @jakesilv Před 2 lety +1

      What you're really saying is one could find excuse after excuse to not make an effort. Electric cars do pollute less than fossil fuel burning cars. It's not zero sum, it's not all or nothing. Electric cars are man times better for the environment than combustion engine cars, but of course, they aren't pollution free.

  • @EastwardTraveller
    @EastwardTraveller Před 7 lety +14

    That chart suggests land devoted to grazing is well-below the "overshoot" threshold and has remained constant. Doesn't make sense considering land being cleared for cattle-ranching is still one of the leading causes of deforestation.

    • @SolarScion
      @SolarScion Před 7 lety +1

      You can also add most of the agricultural land use to animals as it goes to feed the continually eliminated and replaced meat/dairy and egg industries, not to mention much of the fossil fuel expenditure goes to animal ag.

    • @dustystahn3855
      @dustystahn3855 Před 6 lety +8

      It is not the cattle that is the problem but how they are raised. Cattle raised by modern methods are very destructive to the ecosystem and our health. Cattle raised by wholistic methods regenerate marginal land and desert and make them fertile for other crops providing us with healthy food.. Cattle when managed properly put back into the land what they take out. Other forms of agriculture take out more than they put back unless outside amendments are added and that depletes the fertility somewhere else.

    • @oliviah4457
      @oliviah4457 Před 4 lety

      If you are interested, the documentary Cowspiracy explains this

  • @D__vine
    @D__vine Před 4 lety +1

    Realistic and eye opening.👌

  • @alecberrodin1279
    @alecberrodin1279 Před 4 lety +4

    Fantastic. Thank you. I loved his passion and excitement

  • @yagneshpadvi3224
    @yagneshpadvi3224 Před 4 měsíci

    Informative session on Environment and sustainable development.

  • @dr.anilkumarsingh272
    @dr.anilkumarsingh272 Před 5 měsíci

    Excellent Talk. Changed the way we think of environmental sustainability

  • @hirenpatel1406
    @hirenpatel1406 Před 5 měsíci

    Interesting ...... Yes everything is interconnected

  • @sanjeebroytonmoy686
    @sanjeebroytonmoy686 Před 2 lety

    New thinking perspective!

  • @renesolis2604
    @renesolis2604 Před 9 lety +10

    Justin Mog, thank you for an excelent presentation, down to earth !

  • @iBen4G
    @iBen4G Před 7 lety +12

    Good talk! I wish more people cared... Stop using bottled water!

  • @shad0wyenigma
    @shad0wyenigma Před 7 lety +14

    Driving an electric car is not simply moving the emissions from the tailpipe to a coal power station.Alot of people don't know this but it takes a vast amount of electricity to refine oil into Gas, Diesel, etc So, instead of putting electricity into refining Gas, then transporting that fuel to a filling station (burning more fuel), so it can then be burnt in your car, you can just use that electricity for moving the car in the first place.

    • @fionafiona1146
      @fionafiona1146 Před 6 lety

      Car engines are up to 20%efficiency while moder energy plants are clearly over 40%.

  • @jupitherdanach7643
    @jupitherdanach7643 Před 7 lety +40

    have i not paid attention for five minutes or did i really just see a talk on sustainability that does not even mention the meat and dairy production?

    • @SolarScion
      @SolarScion Před 7 lety +5

      Not to forget eggs, but yeah, I kept expecting him to get to that.

  • @geot4647
    @geot4647 Před 8 lety +5

    Well, there's no "balance" if the human population keeps growing (same thing as economic growth, really).

    • @lcrobert3911
      @lcrobert3911 Před 7 lety +3

      totally agree...im not seeing discussion of this fundamental factor. We are just dancing around it

    • @auntsally5921
      @auntsally5921 Před 7 lety +7

      Certainly population is part of the equation. But consumption, at the moment, is the zeroth-order term. When each American consumes the same as 13 Brazilians or 28 Bangladeshis, the spotlight needs to be on consumption… which is to day, on the people causing the most damage, using more than their fair share...

    • @sannhall3887
      @sannhall3887 Před 7 lety +1

      aaaaaaaaamen aunt sally, you tell'm!!!

    • @jennadaigle7508
      @jennadaigle7508 Před 3 lety

      So true. The environmentalist Derrick Jensen had an excellent suggestion for voluntarily reducing human population: Each couple agreeing to having only ONE child. Not a final solution, but imo a good start.

  • @earlpierce7173
    @earlpierce7173 Před 6 lety +5

    Public banks would create debt free money to spend into the economy that could create the production needed to build and design any system we want and need to be sustainable in every aspect of life. Debt free money for purpose is the key. This is more efficient and reliable than crowdfunding and it would create a stable flow of money into the economy and be recycled as it is slowly taxed back out of society. Or it could be left in if needed and more debt free money could be created and spent into the economy. It all depends on the specific need at the time. Create policies around money wisely and to benefit society the best way possible. All money as a debt isn't working and is causing greater and greater need for profit and consumption as a side affect.

  • @AdelinaMonroe
    @AdelinaMonroe Před 4 lety

    💚✨

  • @j.o.quantaman6994
    @j.o.quantaman6994 Před 3 lety +1

    Very poor production quality - varying audio volume. Most graphics cannot be seen. Great intentions but poor results

  • @leenadave783
    @leenadave783 Před 4 měsíci

    informative

  • @whoaminow100
    @whoaminow100 Před 8 lety +1

    Composting also creates methane, you're just doing it in a thousands little spots instead of 1 big on (where the methane 'could' be collected and used although it may not be now.

    • @jia712
      @jia712 Před 8 lety +9

      +richard reeves Composting creates carbon dioxide...if methane's being produced you're doing it wrong

    • @zahrahnisar3700
      @zahrahnisar3700 Před 7 lety +1

      most of the time it creates co2

    • @dieterheinrich8377
      @dieterheinrich8377 Před 7 lety +1

      Most people are doing it wrong. It's hard to do right, keeping it oxygenated.

    • @macjc5
      @macjc5 Před 5 lety

      Eliminating methane is just as idiotic as reducing CO2. Without CO2 = NO LIFE of any kind

    • @macjc5
      @macjc5 Před 5 lety

      IDIOTS want to reduce CO2, plants will die , oxygen reduced, what are you going to breathe?

  • @vishvamitrar
    @vishvamitrar Před 4 lety +1

    you are enlightened bro...

  • @MrSvenovitch
    @MrSvenovitch Před 4 lety +2

    Life is inherently an unsustainable shitshow, always been that way. Our version's falling apart before our eyes. And there's absolutely nothing anybody could do about it anymore. He knows but tries to con you out of your resources to sustain him longer towards the end. Right right right right...what a turd of a human being.

    • @mattyoungdma
      @mattyoungdma Před 4 lety +1

      Con you out of what? I think we've found the real turd of a human being here Sven.

  • @kichigaisensei
    @kichigaisensei Před 6 lety +6

    No answers here. None. Here's my observation of "environmentalists"...when the temperature is below 70°F, they've got their heat on. When it's above 70°F, they've got their air conditioning on. That's for their cars and their homes.
    I live in a temperate climate. I almost NEVER see anyone with their car windows open. I'm the only one.

    • @dollysouthwell7189
      @dollysouthwell7189 Před 5 lety

      what about home windows? We "condition" our home's air only about 3 months /year.

    • @mattyoungdma
      @mattyoungdma Před 4 lety +2

      I am an environmentalist and keep my heat at 62 in the winter and I don't have air conditioning. Plus I only had to fill my gas tank three times in the past year because I always commute by bike, even in the winter. So I guess your observation doesn't really hold water and is probably only self-serving.

    • @rancidcandy1196
      @rancidcandy1196 Před 4 lety

      @@mattyoungdma Matt - good for you. But, let me alone with my lifestyle.

    • @jennadaigle7508
      @jennadaigle7508 Před 3 lety +1

      @@rancidcandy1196 Yep you def have a right to your lifestyle. Even if it contributes to the death of an entire planet. It's truly all about YOU. You go guy!

  • @markschuette3770
    @markschuette3770 Před 2 lety +2

    the economy has to solve the problem- thus a carbon/pollution tax is the way to go- nothing will happen without it- that has been proven over the last 30 years since the first energy crisis- nothing improves is we subsidize the pollution!

  • @martinbekoe9957
    @martinbekoe9957 Před 4 lety

    The audio sucks

  • @ronaldgarrison8478
    @ronaldgarrison8478 Před 5 lety +3

    This is not information, or science. This is stand-up comedy masquerading as information.

  • @dcpadula
    @dcpadula Před 3 lety +1

    I'm confused. Is this a speech about sustainability or human rights and white guilt? "We need to find a way to not need that military". Comical. Take a public speaking class, Teddy.

  • @peterbarrett5496
    @peterbarrett5496 Před 5 lety +5

    Throwing in those side comments about brown or poor people does nothing for your argument and makes you sound like a political pundit

  • @RayRay-zu4uz
    @RayRay-zu4uz Před 5 lety +2

    Just talk no answer

  • @pongkham143
    @pongkham143 Před 3 lety +1

    Devils in disguise.

  • @jackpomerantz8551
    @jackpomerantz8551 Před 5 lety +3

    Not a worthy or worthwhile speech.

  • @nickvillalobos9124
    @nickvillalobos9124 Před 6 lety +3

    This was cringey to watch

  • @Bob-fz7pd
    @Bob-fz7pd Před 4 lety +2

    The modern snake oil salesman.

  • @johnhoward6933
    @johnhoward6933 Před 3 lety

    OH Shut Up ! When was the last time you drank a bottled water, ate at McDonalds, who made your suit, where do you live, does your car have tires ? Sustainability ? you go first.

    • @blixten2928
      @blixten2928 Před 2 lety +1

      I'll go first. It's SO easy to avoid bottled water, skip McDonalds, buy the suit second-hand, and - if you live in a city - take public transportation. What are the difficult steps?

  • @henricuspeters
    @henricuspeters Před 6 lety +2

    Interesting ...... Yes everything is interconnected

    • @joecole5643
      @joecole5643 Před 3 lety

      Nope it isn't. Animals and plants have gone extinct without the eco system collapsing

    • @jennadaigle7508
      @jennadaigle7508 Před 3 lety

      @@joecole5643 Your type of thinking is a perfect example of the disconnect Dr Mog is addressing here.