History of Islam, Part 1 of 5: Reign of Abu Bakr
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 04. 2015
- Support CaspianReport through Patreon:
/ caspianreport
BAKU - The core religious allegory of Islam starts with Muhammad’s revelations in the caves and ends with the death of the fourth successor Ali, almost forty years later. The allegory is analogous to the Last Supper, the Crucifixion, and the Resurrection of Jesus Christ in Christianity. During Muhammad’s lifetime, his community gained control over the Arabian Peninsula. Though he passed away in 632, Islam’s story continued through his four closest followers: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali, who together formed the Rashidun, or Rightly Guided One’s. Together, they established the first Islamic state, the Caliphate.
In just thirty years, the Rashidun Caliphate conquered all of Persia, Egypt, Mesopotamia, the Levant, and even parts of the Byzantine Empire in Anatolia. In some ways, this new state resembled a democracy. All four leaders were elected by council representatives. But the transition of power between these leaders was not straightforward.
Soundtrack:
Decisions Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
Be sure to follow CaspianReport on the social media.
Facebook:
/ caspianreport
Twitter:
/ caspianreport
LiveLeak:
www.liveleak.com/c/caspianreport
Thank you very much for making this. It was very helpful for a non-muslim such as myself to understand the details behind the Sunni-Shia dispute.
Sunni Shiites conflict also occur when Ottoman Sunni fight Safavid Shiites. Also when Saladin a Sunni destroy and abolish Fatimmid Shiites.
Also when Abbasid Revolt happens, at first Abbasid is ally themself with Shiites to fight Umayyad but then Abbasid choose Sunni as idealogy not Shiites
***** You have no evidence whatsoever in regards to Shiites being polytheists. Infact Shiites are the real Sunni.
***** At that time there was no Quran and Hadith, so your argument is not valid.
bas kir There was Quran but it wasnt on paper yet arabs used to be vocal people.
nawaf n
What do you mean by arabs used to be vocal people?
My issue with this is that it was 1400 years ago. The issue should have been resolved by now and is a matter of great shame on Muslims.
Khadijah Brown Not to mention that neither the Caliphate nor the dynasty of Muhammed exist in today's world.
Western colonialism inflicted a lot of trauma on Muslims and I think the solution would have been education and competition rather than radicalism.
Khadijah Brown The problem hasn't been resolved because of a lack of personal responsibility. Blaming Western colonialism, instead of overcoming the denial of Islamic imperialism, is the precise reason why Islam hasn't ever found internal peace.
pawbard It is so sad to see a whole people suffer because of this. Biblical pundits try to justify all this warring because of the prophesy given to Hagar before she bore Ishmael. I just feel sad for this.
***** I thought that the quarrel started with the argument over who would follow the prophet Muhammad PBUH? In Shia Kutbah, they are always ranting about the murder of Ali. The fact that they have not resolved this is not acceptable to me.
Azerbaijan (where this channel is located) is a Shia majority country, so this video gives precedence towards Ali. He was extremely important and loved by the Prophet (PBUH), but Abu Bakr was well known to be Muhamed's (PBUH) best friend, right hand man, and the first man to accept Islam. Other than that, great video!
Let's see if you give your everything to your friend "right hand man" and not to your children
LOL whatever
Really enjoyed this. Good job on the compilation!
My only suggestion would be to include some kind of bibliography or collection of easily accessible and verifiable sources. Very useful especially if we want to repeat what we've learned
Great video as always mate. I really like your factual and unbiased reports on subjects.
*Lol. You sit down to take notes from these videos and end up finding that you're writing out everything he's saying in the video because it is all important knowledge. Well done, Shirvan!*
Great docs and clear explanations about history of Islam. Thank you CaspianReport!
Thank you, Shirvan. I always learn something new from your videos. Cheers, Brother!
This is incredibly informative and helpful. Thanks for creating the content.
This is a very well put-together and narrated video.
awesome video as always thanks for the short history lesson, waiting in anticipation for part 2
Game of Thrones: Islamic edition
***** OK maybe in practice it's playing out as a power struggle for control of the muslims however the political player sin this game are only nominally sunni and shia, no one really believes their rhetoric,
Behind the scenes however the Sunni and Shia is very much a religious issue NOT simply a succession row as is commonly believed. Why would people still be arguing after 14oo years about who should have been caliph.
The major issue is that of Tawheed or monotheism. Sunnis view Allah as the ultimate Creator and Maintainer of the Universe. Shia believe (some groups of Shia) that their imams and Ali have control over all atoms and without them the universe would cease to be.
These beliefs cannot be reconciled.
1.2 billion. lol where did you get that number . more like 1.9 billion thank you very much
Ali had sons name Abu Bakr, Uthman, Ali, Omar. Ali married his daughter to Omar. Ali's sons had sons named Uthman, Omar and Abu Bakr. Uthman named a son Ali.
Does this sound like Ali hated the other Caliphs?
Also the hadith you talk about when examined neutrally cant possibly apply to the shia imams. For a start none of them except Ali and Hasan were actually caliphs or rulers! How can they claim islam was prevailing under their caliphs' (as the hadith states) when 'shia' islam was at its lowest points during the lives of their so called '12 imams'? According to Shia all used taqiya to conceal their true belief and identities.
Nothing in the hadith states the rulership should be hereditary or that they will be descendants of Ali or infallible.
***** Hadith, in the form that reached us, was compiled nearly three hundred years after the passing of the Prophet. And compiled by mere men, not some perfect beings exempt from error. How anyone can claim a hadith's authenticity is indisputable simply because it's a sahih is beyond me, especially given the many direct or implied contradictions found in these same sahih ahadith.
***** What surviving collection of hadith was compiled 3-10 years after the passing of Muhammad (pbuh)? He died in 632. Sahih al Bukhari was finished around 846, so I was off by a good century, it's 200 years, not 300. Sahih Muslim was written in the same period. None of the 6 major collections of hadith were compiled long after any contemporaries of the Prophet had passed.
No matter how thoroughly you study what is basically chinese whispers, errors are bound to happen as evidenced by the contradictions in sahih ahadith that simply cannot be explained except by accepting that some of them are not authentic. As for the Quran, it was not transmitted only through oral traditions. While a great number of Muslims had memorised it by heart before the passing of the Prophet, it was also actually written down during his life time. However, its compilation in one book and the arrangement of the order of the chapters were done after his death.
got yourself a new subscriber, i love the way you were totally unbiased and proclaimed facts in this video. :)
Wow, thank you so much for the videos you do.
Thank you for this video, Caspian Report. It filled a few holes in this grand story for me. I eagerly anticipate Part 2. Peace.
Great video for anyone to watch. Ready for part 2!
Really informative,
Well written,
Just great!
The video shots are actually from a drama known as "Umar series".Its really great and accurate historically speaking :)
Thanks for that info, I'm gonna watch this now (which I didn't know existed before your comment). But does it give info about Islam and Khilafah history or does it just focus on Omar? Because I'm interested to know about Islam's history.
Never mind, I just finished watching it and it was really great, I'm definitely gonna rewatch it again.
@@myeverything5797 is it accurate, historically speaking?
@@myeverything5797 Is it biased?
@@randellorton4643 It is accurate.
You really did a good job in this. I now have a better understanding of this issue. Can't wait to see the next parts.
Very nice topic ! have been waiting for such video for long time ! Please do history videos more often ! Thank You !
This beautiful word from Abu Bakar save Islam
"Whoever worship Muhammad, Truly he is dead. But, Whoever worship Allah God Almighty then He is forever Alive"
This is truly beautiful and amazing word. Imagine at that time people cannot accept that Muhammad is dead. Without Abu Bakar, Islam will be just like Christianity who worship Jesus. Jesus said do not worship him, you must worship God alone
afifi hasan You don't say Salaam to the Prophet in the end of your salat?
Jarri Abidi what you mean?
Abu Bakr (ra) represents Sharia, Umar (ra) represents Tareeqa, Uthman (ra) represents Haqeeqah and Ali (ra) represents Marifat.
Mbathroom1
Wow your god died on the cross according to your belief.what a god😂😂😂😂😂
The Kamal Kartik
Stupid dumb ass.tell me what evidence do you have that he killed people who didnt accept his religion.to be honest you have no evidence.and btw GOD doesnt dies.GOD is everlasting he never dies.God doesnt eat and drink like your jesus.what a god.one who eats drinks thinks like a man and dies like a man as you all claim and you still consider this simple human being as god.he was nothing but a messenger of God.thats it.
This guy puts out great data and I love learning from the videos....Not a fan of Islam/ religion in general but that doesn't matter....I like learning all sides of the story and to start understanding why Islam is the way it is. Keep up the great work.
Don't pay heed to the guy above. He's narrow minded-view only gives the entirety of us a bad image.
Just discovering all your videos! Your my new favorite channel! Thanks for such great content man..well done.
excellent effort and consideration for this report. Credit goes to you Caspian Report. You're digging up stuff and reporting. We all should do that.
I'm so glad that someone of your quality made histories of Islam, as someone from an Islamic background, it's beautiful to see
You do such a good job on your videos. Thanks.
Great video! Tells a history that you can’t find easily anywhere else. Thank you.
I have to say, your reports are very good... I look forward to them...
9:08 There is a Family in the middle of the Arabian Peninsula called Ghatafan....That is my family and I descend from them...Also I was born in the same spot :-)
haha the ghatafan huh? That cool there where troublesome during the seerah thats for sure. I think they killed like 70 muslims i think before later on becoming muslims
I descend from Ans of Yemen.
I descend from Ali & I live in lebanon unfortunately.
Hi i am descendant from ummah oh HOLY PROHET PBUH.😐
Ali Sheikh yeah sure lol
I am Shia Muslims and I respect all my sahabas(ra) except for muhawiah and yazid and also my sunni bros. But imp is that we are one nation but some of us are lost in darkness and I pray for them🙏🙏🙏🙌💚💚
And Shias my brothers as well.
I don’t belong to a religious sect but it maddens me when bigots disrespect people’s religions. Greedy men acting selfishly take advantage of religious institutions, yes. But religions are not evil. Pleased to see you all speaking peacefully. Bless!
Well as Sunnis we definitely don't like Yazid, but we like Muawiya (r.a) but the most hated thing he did was making the caliphate hereditary to his tribe ( like a dynastic empire).
@Shawn Exactly!! Past is past.
Shawn note that the citizens aren’t the ones indoctrinated into fighting Sunni vs Shia. It’s the political leaders who have masked their agenda to stir this pot, not holy war. If they didn’t have Islam to divide people they’d be doing it by race or geography to meet their ends. People blame religion when it’s simply the most commonly thing greedy politicians use to unite people for their cauaw
One of the most educated and interesting people I have ever heard! Great videos and keep it up
lots of people here saying very nice things but if you truly support how great this guy is you should really support his content and reward him for his time and brilliant effort in patron ,, he's the most deserving person I've ever known since I started youtube
So the difference between Shia and Sunni is not that big. Makes me wonder why they are making such a big deal out of it.
Troublesome2008 In practical terms its not a big deal, but in reality what It means is.. Who gets to wield the power and Influence over a billion muslims! And THAT causes all the problems and conflict.
Troublesome2008 The problem isn't political as much as it's religious. If you believe Ali was the rightful ruler of Islam and an Islamic issue needed a ruling, then the opinions of Abu Bakr and other Islamic leaders for example wouldn't matter. Originally the issues were political differences over the rightful leader of the Islamic state, but the Qur'aan isn't specific on all things and the hadeeth doesn't mention all things. Eventually the people need a ruling for difficult or vague issues. So as time progresses and you get further & further away from the starting point the religious differences become apparent with different rulings.
Also there's a lot more to it than just "Shias". Not all Shias agree with each other. For example the largest Shia group are the Twelvers who believe there's 12 rightly guided Imams after Muhammad with the 12th Imam eventually returning to bring justice. The Ismailis on the other hand don't believe in the 12th leaders and think the succession has been continues since Ali with them now having the 54th descendant of Ali (it doesn't end with the 12th Imam, it keeps on going). There's also the Druze and Alawite (like the Assads in Syria).
Troublesome2008 When the two sides independently develop histories that politicize and demonize each other, yeah it does lead to tension and conflict. Like when Shiites accuse Muhammad's wife and Abu Bakr's daughter Aisha of initiating the battle of Jamal by shooting down Ali's partisans, they change a character who is perceived as the mother of the faith by Sunnis and one of Muhammad's most loyal and pious wives into a she-demon and a filthy hypocrite who opposed the rightfully elected leader after Uthman's death, Ali, killing several Muslims when Ali called for peace within the Umma. Is she a saint protecting the true faith of her husband, or is she a politically driven fiend who twists the faith in her favour to keep the power in Medina with her affiliates? Some Shiite histories also say things like that Abu Bakr and his supporters killed the prophet to usurp power and threatened the prophet's family, Ali, Fatimah, and their children, to coerce Ali into accepting the evil Abu Bakr as leader. When your group vilifies and spreads what the other sees as lies and slander about their rightfully elected religious and political leaders, it can cause quite a bit of hatred and rage in response.
Troublesome2008 Big differecne between Sunni(85% majority) and Shia(15% sect from Iran) is that Shites deviated from Islam and believe their Ayatollahs and Imams to be Divine which is blasphemy according to Quran. Similar to Catholic Pope-Priest system are the shias. So Shites believe their imams to be divine which Sunnis find to be repulsive blashemy since no man is Divine only God is.
While Majority of Muslims believe Leader has simply have great knowledge and be fit to lead and we use Quran and Hadith as sources while Shites use their imams to create silly laws like taqiya(deception)
Troublesome2008 Well... It's like it is everywhere, where different ideologies collide in the hopes of getting some form of power...Power, and even just the desire for it, corrupts.
As a German Atheist I'm somewhat on the outside though. :P
Our (mostly Turkish) Muslims here are Sunnis and very moderate, with many 2nd and 3rd generation kids even becoming Atheists themselves.
The problem with shia is they believe islam is a family dynasty. This is contrary to the teaching profhet muhammad pbuh). Whoever has the best knowledge of islam and best moral conduct is the leader. Leadership in islam is not blood related royalty. People will always try change the truth with twist and lies just like they did with Jesus words. But truth will prevail
So u mean to tell me that omar had bether morals than Ali? Or did he fight better? Who had most knowledge? The man that was raised by the profet? Or a friend of he? Who did elect omar? Was it democratic brother?
Dumb ass shit, you and I both know the truth is with the minority. Our profet said that if the muslim community did take a path, and Ali dosent follow Ali. Ali is haq only a beliver loves him, and only monafiqen is against him. Use Bukhari everything stands there brother.
Ahmed Jaafar Please don't speak like that brother, Walid Shabaab , Shia's beleive that leaders are chosen by god, therefore I ask you, if you don't have a choice on who the last caliph will be (Mahdi), what makes you think you had a choice on the first?
Please don't take offence we should be open to others perspectives. Either I am wrong and you are right or you are wrong and I am right, that is why we should respectfully discuss so that we can uncover the truth which would be beneficial for both parties.
Walid Shabaab Tell that to the house of Saud the big Sunnis extremists
Walid Shabaab Wrong, who told you that its not blood related?
This Verse of the Quran clears out all your misunderstanding about Blood related kingship.
19:3-9
And indeed, I fear the successors after me, and my wife has been barren, so give me from Yourself an HEIR
Who will inherit me and inherit from the family of Jacob. And make him, my Lord, pleasing [to You]."
[He was told], "O Zechariah, indeed We give you good tidings of a boy whose name will be John.
Great job!!!! You saved me a ton of reading. Thanks.
I dont have words to praise this report, i am a Muslim and of course i have heard all about this while growing up but this is the first time i am getting grip of everything.
Thank you Shervan
I think you are approaching this subject from a shia point of view rather than looking at it from neutral point of view
Yes
Abdikadir Ibrahim yeah the guy is an Azerbaijani, he clearly has a shi’i bias
Im amazed that this is the only criticism of this video so far. Its rare for a islam related video to have such a civilized comment section.
actually, he viewed it kind of naturally, but leaned towards the Sunni view, not the shia one!
Abdikadir Ibrahim heavily from the Sunni point of view for example. Ali(as) pledged allegiance to bakr whether it was 3 days or 6 months, he did so.
Also, that Ali(as) was the deciding factor and vote to nominate umer as the second caliph.
If either of the above was correct, there would be no Shi’a today.
I'm gonna have to give it to the Sunnis, they have the better claim.
***** Yes. More democratic = Better claim! :)
Its because in Islam, God choses not the pepole. When was it democratic? They did elect them self. After it the chaliphet was a sunni kingship. Our profhet Mohammed phub did elect Ali, but you cant argue with a sunni Even if it stands clear in his own books..
Sunni is the most, cus they make muslims with force and thats not allowed in Islam. Freewill you cant conqer a land and make them muslims against ther will.
Ahmed Jaafar Sunni is majority because it is truth and based on Quran-Sunnah all new reverts to Islam become Sunni, Shites are only Iranians and Few Arabs. It is a stupid sect which promotes imams and grave worship so no one becomes shia. Shias are always small minority around 10% because it is such a un-islamic silly sect
Ahmed jaffar actually it's the opposite. The Sunni countries was slowly converted over centuries, with very few instances of forced conversion. While Iran was forcefully converted to Shia Islam from Sunni by the Safavids.
Awesome job with this. The information is well presented and is concise. Im learning a lot from it. Thank you.
Cant wait for part 2. :)
This was PRE-Sunni-Shia period, the period when they were One Ummah.
ALLAH IS GREAT !!!
Greatest*
You do a great job making these videos.
very very interesting and very very informative... just hope that information wasn't biased in an way... waiting for part 2... good work guys!!
I have a major issue around 11 minutes. You say the Byzantines were planning to conquer Arabia, which is ludicrous. Heraclius was old and the Eastern Romans were exhausted from their great war with Persia in the previous few decades(even though they won). They had no interest, let alone ability, to do any such thing.
Even when the romans were strong, they never showed interest in conquering Arabia(which had always been fragmented). The invasion from arabia was a complete surprise, and rocked the roman world.
Burhan the Somali "The Romans showed interest in the Arabian peninsula two times. The first being an expedition ordered by Emperor Augustus and led by Aelius Gallus. Aelius Gallus took 10.000 soldiers from Egypt and was sent to either make peace treaties or subdue the Arabs, in order to have a direct trade with the Indians without the Somalis or Arabs to intervene."
Which happened over 600 years before Islam. It does nothing to disprove my point. The romans typically didn't care much about Arabia, as their chief concern in that region was always the Persians.
"The second time was in the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) when he sent an emmisary to the chief of the Ghassanid tribe to convert to Islam. The Ghassanid chief not only neglected to convert to Islam, he also murdered the Muslim emissary. The Prophet (pbuh) sent an army to avenge the emissary. This time the allies of the Ghassanids (the Romans) intervened and killed of the army. The Prophet (pbuh) then sent another army, however at this time the Prophet (pbuh) died. The rest of the story you know. (The Muslims elected new leaders who fought the Romans and the Persians)'
Source? The Gassanids were not romans, and neither they nor romans tried to conquer Arabia, as you even admit.
Burhan the Somali "Yes, the Romans didn't show much interest in the Arabian peninsula, but they did these two times. The second time being in the timeline of this video.
"
They showed in interest. as in one of their allies was attack buy some strange, obscure cult. No plans to conquer arabia were made as a result.
Mohamed Mo
And how was that a byzantine invasion?
Mohamed Mo
And what sources do you have of this affair?
Mohamed Mo
The only sources existing are some muslim biographies. No Roman source offers any account of the the that ever occurring, no is there any other evidence for it.
Abu bakr never wanted to be the caliph its that so much people loved him they gave him bayiiah,
I'm sunni and this is jokes lol
3 Muhajirs and 10 or so Ansaris have chosen the 1st caliph
The criterion of selecting a leader in Islam is if that person who is elected does not want their position to begin with and is forced into it.
@@abele7009 If you're uneducated,please stop vomiting nonsense
If you'll set up a website and start charging for subscription fees, I'll GLADLY pay, and you might get a bigger team to create more of these amazing videos more often. Always so informative and well edited, such a pleasure.
THANK YOU
Thanks for the history class. Quite interesting especially when you consider its ramifications.
6:04 his wife kadeeja was the first person to accept Islam.
First male is Abubakr
الله اعلم
+Ibrahim Alsaadi its always been known that the first male is Ali. Except its divided and taught as such:
Ali was the first "boy" to enter islam.
Abu Bakr was the first "man" to enter islam. Ali was young at the time.... so Ali is the first male technically.
First male is Abu bakr, the closest friend of prophet Muhammad.
Most beloved male is also Abu bakr
Khadeeja was Islamic startup sole investor
Chez Hezt ‘Most beloved’ Lol dont be stupid
Shamil Najar It doesn't matter. The Prophets own uncle Abu Lahab was criticised in the Quran, this shows that having a relation to the Prophet doesn't mean your automatically have good faith
corrections
right hand man of prophet mohammed was abo baker and he was the first male muslim
kingmoremixman
This video shia supporter .prophet Muhammad he never appoint Ali as successor.
he *was* theright hand of the prophet.(saw)
You stole everything from ali.. May God forgive you for what you have done.
Great job. You're doing serious effort in presenting history & you're brave to touch some sensitive issues. Naturally you'll be making some mistakes, but that's what anyone does. Those who never make mistakes are those who don't do anything.
I love this channel! What a great piece! It’s not easy to find historically-neutral Islamic histories, especially here in America. I will send this to friends and family to help them understand Islam. Bravo.
Check al-Muqaddimah for historical videos and “let’s talk religion” for theological things.
(1)Exalt the name of your Lord, the Most High,(2),Who created and proportioned,(3),And Who destined and [then] guided,(4),And who brings out the pasture,(4),And [then] makes it black stubble.(6),We will make you recite, [O Muhammad], and you will not forget,(7)Except what Allah should will. Indeed, He knows what is declared and what is hidden.(8)And We will ease you toward ease.(9)So remind, if the reminder should benefit;(10)He who fears [ Allah ] will be reminded.(11)But the wretched one will avoid it ,(12)[He] who will [enter and] burn in the greatest Fire,(13)Neither dying therein nor living.(14)He has certainly succeeded who purifies himself(15)And mentions the name of his Lord and prays.(16)But you prefer the worldly life,(17)While the Hereafter is better and more enduring.(18)Indeed, this is in the former scriptures,(19)The scriptures of Abraham and Moses. (Holy Quran) Surat Al-'A`lá
استغفرك ربي عدد ماكان ومايكون .. looking forward for hell.....as most geniuses in the world have been Jews or athiest or comedians I bet they would have made hell much better than heaven.....although I would love to have 70 virgins(only reason I want to go to heaven)....but spending time with Einstein Carl saegen Neil degrasse Tyson Stephen Hawking would be hella lot better....l
Sub-han-Allah
Ali himself never thought he was the rightful successor, however he didn't accord to the spontaneous nature of selecting the khalif and the omission of the majority of the sahaba (companions) opinions including himself, and he swore allegiance to Abu Bakr a few days later as mentioned .
And regarding the reasons supporting Ali as a successor, they weren't his, but were the opinions of Shiites who came after many years of Ali's death.
And the narrations about Abu Bakr threatening Ali and such are regarded as invalid by hadith scholars because of their unreliable sources and Narrators . and there is a very delicate science of analyzing and validating different historical narrations , just look up for Hadith studies . So a dispute like this can be solved if we search for the truth and rejected the lies or at least the dubious narrations .
AlSAMSAMA read 'Peshawar Nights' you can download online
AlSAMSAMA Yea Shia history is a bunch of lies and myths so they can break away from Mainstream Islam 85% are sunni. Ali(ra) loved Abu Bakr and Umar(ra) and was loyal to them
TheGiantKiller8 You people are a bunch of ignorant fools who have no idea about the history of Islam and yet you have the audacity to accuse Shias is making up lies. it is evident in your own hadith books like 'Sahih' Bukhari, 'Sahih' Muslim and many many of your eminent scholars have recorded it down as Ali being the successor of the Prophet (pbuh). You havent even read your books and yet you accuse Shias as making up lies.
Hammy Hatif Hammy learn the arguments of Shite imams who accuse the companions and wives of apostacy and they fabricate much history. It is a sick lying cult who has legalized lying(taqiya) muta and grave-imam worship. And they accuse the Prophet pbuh and his companions of the most evil things.
So they went astray from the straight path just as many others have
TheGiantKiller8 Shiites, as far as I've heard, only accuse those who are worthy of being accused. Indeed not every companion of the Prophet was pious. There were people who abused the Prophet and his Holy family and, who constantly cursed them. Are they worthy of being praised. Shiites only praise the companions who were worthy of being praised. Shias didn't fabricate hadiths, even if they did, they would be rejected if it goes agaisnt the Quran. Shia ahadith books are not labelled "Sahh" because they believe the only Sahih is the Quran but Sunnis have 2 Sahihain books in which they accept every hadith in it most of which WERE fabricated by the early Abbasid, and Ummayad Caliphate. In these books, Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, we find the most viscous and outrageous hadith like the visibility of Allah,
‘Sahih Bukhari’ (Vol. I, in the Chapter “Fazla's-Sujud Min Kitabu'l-Adhan”, page 100; Vol. IV, p.92 of ‘Sahih Muslim’, "Babu's-Sira Min Kitabu'r-Riqaq", and ‘Sahih Muslim’ (Vol. I, in the Chapter "Isbatu'l-Ruyatu'l-Mu'minin Rabbahum Fi'l-Akhira," page 86); and ‘Musnad’ of Imam Hanbal, Volume II, page 275
very good and educative video, thank you very much for this !
Great video! hope you can finish part II fast! for me understanding history makes is easier to understand what is going on today. In the end its all about religion or money or passion, we kill each other for one of this reasons... Keep posting more videos!!!
Abu bakr is one of the greatest military commanders in history. he managed to defeat the two largest powers in the world (save china) his conquests can only be compared to that of Ghengis khan
Which battles did he command
Kekero let’s not get carried away. I bet Gengis Khan never got scared in a cave and began to cry loudly almost giving his position away. Greatest military commander 😂😂😂
@@dextermorgan750 Im sure anyone would be scared shitless if they saw what abu bakr (r.a) saw in that cave also abu bakr (r.a) was without a doubt the best caliph
He consolidated the muslim power at a time of rebellions and grief
it almost collapsed had it not been for the strong leadership of abu bakr (r.a) the ridda wars is proof of this
Eid Abokor maybe you would be scared shitless but I have enough faith that if the messenger of Allah(swt), Muhammad(saws) says once, ‘do not be afraid’ I will have enough faith to not be afraid. If he was so brave and such a good military commander, why was he so scared to begin with?
Despite the assurances of the holy Prophet(saws), abu bakr was still soooo scared and began to cry so loudly that he almost revealed their position to the enemy. It literally took divine intervention for him to be quiet yet you still believe he was ever so brave and the best caliph 😂😂😂
What did he see in the cave that scared him so much? A spider? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Eabokor1 1st Caliph wasnt even supposed to be in Madinah. He was supposed to join Usama's bin Zaid's army with the other leading Sahabis. Read history
No doubt, Abu Bakr was the perfect successor of the Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam. His charismatic leadership and a rapid, logical decision taking ability was vital to that moment.
You mean monster who ate Fadak of prophet's daughter?
Yeah right
@@imsyed5 Wut
@@Avicerox search about Fadak
@@imsyed5 you weird 🤦♂️
You seem like you don’t have knowledge
Thank you for this. Those of us that are not part of the community rarely get to hear this history. Very interesting.
welcome back!!
what are your sources for saying that abu bakr invaded persia for stragitical reasons (what you said)
@@hamzaslr9093 I agree.
Small correction, the first male to become Muslim is actually Abu Bakr.
Mosa Mania
Sunni Muslims have differing views on the order of conversion Ali and
of Abu Bakr-or, although there is agreement that Ali's conversion is
first among children, and Abu Bakr was the first adult male to believe
in Muhammad. It is commonly said that Abu Bakr was the first grown man
to accept Islam, and Ali the first child; this formulation does not draw
any conclusions as to whether Abu Bakr or Ali was the very first male. for shias it's ali
Mosa Mania As I recall he was out of town when muhammad proclaimed his prophet-hood. Even Zayd was a muslim before Abu bakr.
Tabari quotes from Muhammad Bin Sa'ad Bin Abi Waqqas:
I asked my father whether Abu Bakr was the first of the Muslims. He said, 'No, more than fifty people embraced Islam before Abu Bakr; but he was superior to us as a Muslim. And Umar ibn Khattab had embraced Islam after forty-five men and twenty-one women. As for the foremost one in the matter of Islam and faith, it was Ali ibn Abi Talib.'
And that's okay, it shouldn't matter who joined the religion first, it should only matter if abu bakr was fit for leadership.
Ali was the first male muslim, at the age of 8 years.
Mosa Mania
According to Islam, Adam was the first Muslim and prophet.
Ahmed Jaafar Ali is first Children while Abu Bakar is first adult male to accept islam
Great Video.. keep up the good work.
Great Video as always
i prefer your videos about current geopoltical issues more.
maybe you could talk about the development of the oil price and its geopolitical impact.
what effect it has on US fracking industry / OPEC states / renewable energy etc.
is the price going to continue to drop? (sanctions lifted against iran)
this is just a proposal.
keep up the good work
ThePentaT Yeah, but to understand geopolitics better it can be very handy to analise history. Because there is just so much recemblance. I think that's the reason he sometimes chooses to do these kinds of videos.
ThePentaT From my understanding, the drop in oil prices was affected by 3 things: 1. Winter - Oil prices usually drop during winter, because people go out less due to cold weather, etc. Expect prices to go back up as demand starts increasing during Spring and Summer. Now you can see that prices are going back up slowly until they probably reach a new high this summer. 2. Overproduction - This was mainly caused by the Saudis, which started to increase production earlier last year, and that led to markets being oversupplied. This was done without considering the oil prices drop, so they probably took a hit, as well as other producers. They did this considering the situation in Ukraine with Russia. As Europe is planning to become less dependent on Russian oil, the Saudis had to increase production to be able to supply Europe. However, Europe is pretty bad economically so... And 3. US fracking industry... The US fracking industry is a totally unprecedented phenomenon that's now blooming. This will exponentially cut costs of US electric energy; which won't need as much oil to produce; making the US independent in energy within the next 10 years or less. The US will still keep buying oil from the Middle East, but just to supplement the energy base. The sanctions lifting on Iran will not change prices much, since they don't have the best quality. The US however, is now producing the best quality crude ever produced in history. Renewable energy doesn't make a big difference, but it is going to slowly influence in the US becoming completely energy independent.
That's the best I got at this point.
Mauro Augusto Mexia I am an American Strategy Watcher, my take is America has colluded with the Saudi's to flood the oil market for two reasons 1. To damage the Russian economy over the Crimea, Ukraine actions 2. Place other Middle East oil producing nations on notice that their revenues can be greatly affected by not following America's policy's.America is changing the entire world oil market power structure with fracking and the Middle East will soon become irrelevant to western country's. " Hear me out" American fracked oil is produced for $25.per barrel, Russian oil is produced for $55. per barrel, so America can sell a barrel of oil for 100% profit at the price Russia produces oil for. America in the future will not export their oil, they will export the fracking technology and equipment to Western and European country's. This will end the monopoly of Middle East oil over Europe and the entire West.As I write this America is about to flood the world market with Liquefied Natural Gas, this will brake the back of the Russian economy. In reality the Middle East as been flooded with weapons for over thirty years by Russia to disrupt Middle East oil and drive up Russian oil and gas prices to Europe, millions have died because of this Russian strategy. The Middle East may hate these fact's, and the Middle East may deny them, but they are the facts of the future. The only way the Middle East will survive at all will be to cut off all the Arms and Ammunition being brought in from Russian Proxy's " Russians own's those factory's in other country's" Russia will destroy the Middle East to supply the Chinese with all their oil.
Roha Waha
I agree with a lot of what you say.
Roha Waha You made many fundamental mistakes. I will try to tackle a few:
- America doesn't need to put any nation in the Middle East on notice as they are already in bed with the Saudis and the Saudis do whatever Uncle Sam wants to. This became clear when Saudi-Arabia refused to cut down its production causing the collapse of oil prices, which in essence is exactly what the US wanted. An act that is in fact against their own national interests.
We also witnessed how independent nations such as Iran and Venezuela failed to convince the Saudis to curtail their production.
- Middle East was already irrelevant as far as the oil prices are concerned. It is a misconception to think the oil prices are set by OPEC. The reality is: oil prices are set in London and New York
- I seriously doubt there is any truth to what you claim as far as the cost price is concerned. I work in the Oil and Gas industry and I can tell you there is no way oil produced by fracking could cost less than a traditional way of extracting. No way... Furthermore, there is evidence that the number of drilling licenses in the US have plummeted tremendously in the past few months, which is a clear indication that United States is probably hit worse than Russia is.
- I also doubt United States would flood the market with gas as fewer wells are being drilled. Furthermore, the gas prices in North America are the cheapest in the world. So, it is probably wise to hold off producing any more gas in the States. That is also why Canada is developing a huge gas terminal in Vancouver to export its gas to China where prices are more favourable.
- Russia's export of weapons are neglectable compared to Billions of Dollars that the US sold to the Persian Gulf Arabs with which they are bombing Yemenis day in day out. Some of these weapons are also smuggled to be delivered to groups such as ISIS (Mind you ISIS is the bastard child of S-Arabia, Turkey and the US).
In fact, it is the American weapons that are killing more than anything else whether it is in the hands of the Israeli or the Saudis.
- In fact, the only way the Middle East will survive is by flushing American ships out of the Persian Gulf, which has been the source of all the tension in the region. It wasn't Russia that created the chaos we see in Syria, Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan. It was the US and its blood-thirsty allies that have ruined the region.
"The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: ."...If If I had to take a close friend, then I would have to take Abu Bakr as my close friend. And indeed your companion is Allah's close friend." Tirmidhi Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3655
حَدَّثَنَا مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلاَنَ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ، أَخْبَرَنَا الثَّوْرِيُّ، عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ أَبِي الأَحْوَصِ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " أَبْرَأُ إِلَى كُلِّ خَلِيلٍ مِنْ خِلِّهِ وَلَوْ كُنْتُ مُتَّخِذًا خَلِيلاً لاَتَّخَذْتُ ابْنَ أَبِي قُحَافَةَ خَلِيلاً وَإِنَّ صَاحِبَكُمْ خَلِيلُ اللَّهِ " . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ . وَفِي الْبَابِ عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ وَأَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ وَابْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ وَابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ .
Subhanallah,
Just want to say thank you for another brilliant series. Also what are those clips and pictures you use? Some of the paintings are pretty impressive!
Incredibly educational. Thanks.
(1)Say, "He is Allah , [who is] One,(2)Allah , the Eternal Refuge.(3)He neither begets nor is born,(4)Nor is there to Him any equivalent." . (Holy Quran) Surat Al-'Ikhlāş
If you want to talk of the History of Islam, surely you should start with saying who exactly Muhammad was and what his exploits were?.
It's part of a mini series he's doing on the history of the Middle East. Not the history of Islam, though the close connection is obvious.
He already has a video on pre-Islamic Middle East and the rise of the Muslim state, specifically its conquest of Persia.
Dnt Wry So why is it called the history of Islam? Perhaps he doesn't want to talk about Muhammad because a large part of what he did was despicable, and if he did mention those particular exploits he'll be stoned by a sharia court somewhere.
MarshalEnglish Because the history of Islam is closely tied to the history of the Middle East.
This video specifically was regarding the succession period.
Ahh I see, you're one of those people who are always aching to start a heated religious debate. I'll leave you to yourself.
MarshalEnglish name one historical figure who didnt do evil shit.
MarshalEnglish 1 : mohammed was last just a messenger of "Islam". not a founder.
2 : the work of the historian ibn isaac was almost lost as ibn abaas also had a history of early islam but that one had no record left.
3 : those exploits which you so eager to discuss has weak if not very weak authenticity to it, and its always was a subject to a debates between the historian and the scholars unlike the rashdoon era the historian records was far more authentic and can be confirmed by multiple sources.
4 : you are coming from a very ignorant or what so called "useful idoit POV" of attacking the messenger but not the message, if you would asked for origin of islam and what is is message insteed going for it's last messenger.
5 : there is no punishment by stoning in islamic sharia , and those who are saying they have has no authintic authority to it not from quraan or even any hadith.
Excellent overview, Sherwan!
Amazing channel man keep it up
Great detail covered, but you need to specify that the 'miscarriage' of Fatima is a 12er Shia view, and not authenticated in Sunni sources.
He also needs to clarify many of his views are heavily biased towards Sunni Islam.
@@dextermorgan750 nope it's neutral. If it seems like it glorifies sunnis it's because they were right. The whole split is petty, andhe Shia's won't let go of it.
Haitam chouiekh you are clearly not biased... 🙄
@@dextermorgan750 nope it's towards Shia
Mohammed Anas how so brother?
That's how you pronounce Caliphate? With the `C` as an `H`? I've been pronouncing it as "Kah-lee-fat".
Its letter is خ in Indonesian we romanise as Kh, it sound come from throat, you need to go to google translate and listen to it carefully
It's Khi-laa-fatt
Eagerly waiting for the 4th part of history of islam.pls upload asap.thank you
Great work, sir.. Instead of having 5 parts it should be a single documentary.
Welcome to my channel.
to me this look like shiareport
Better than any Umari report :)
مسلم قناص المهرة yes and the Fatima accident doesn't have historical essentially you cans do scientific research and you will never ever find historical essentially also that is what the majority of Muslims think it
My friend thank you for the information, the more I study about the history of Islam I realize those companion deliberately disobey profit Muhammad command to gain power and authority that was the reason they did not allow Ali become the first Khalifat, Ali did not want the fight them because of it could weaken or destroy the Islam, why it was so important that history? According to profit Muhammad Ali was trained by him from childhood, and he told I am City of knowledge and Ali Gate to that Knowledge, it was different than Abubakar the Fabric seller or Umar the Goat shepherd, that is the reason today with a population near two billion Muslim we have to run away from an Islamic country to Nonislamic country, because at the beginning of Islam after profit they disobey the command of Allah and his profit.
In islam, Khalif herritage, is not bestowed through familie Lineage. This was the Problem the Prophet Muhammad PBuH had with the Quraish. They would keep the power within the familie. So your argument brother, is not valid here. Moreover it was well known, that Abu Bakr was the best. Umar once said to Prophet Muhammad, I have sacrificed half of my wealth in name of Allah. The Prophet said, Abu Bakr gave all he had in the Name of Islam. It was also narrated that the companions used to talked about Abu Bakr in terms that he is the Best after Prophet Muhammad pbuh, Prophet Muhammad was sitting right next to them and was silent. Wenn the Prophet would hear something with was untrue, he would intervene, but he never did. So he always accepted the fact. Also there is a Hadith in Muslim, that Prophet Muhammad said. iF there would be another Prophet, it would be Umar. So The Prophets best Friends and Companions where Abu Bakr and Umar. The People at the time knew Abu Bakr, and voted. So I do not understand the fact that people speak of mistreatment of Ali peace and blessings upon him. We should educate ourselves in the lives of the companions so that we do not make such grave statements.
My brother I did not want to go to the detail, but I guess I have to, Ali told once Rasul Allah beginning of Islam gathered people of Qorayshe (we had one leg of lamb and one bowel of Kamel milk) around 500, people and asked who is going to support my religion no one stand I(Ali) stand, profit told me to sit Ali and the third time when I stand he told me you going to be my successor, then we feed all the people there with lamb and milk and everyone eat and drink and the food was same as beginning nothing was less, and people told Muhammad to voodoo us(History of Tabary, volume 2), Gazevat Kahandaq, Ali the only one stand against Amr eben il abdovad , and killed him, in Badr first battel Ali Killed brother of Hend, in kaeybar Ali was victorious, none of companion had faith and bravery of Ali, he sleeps in the bed of profit, in mobahelah Rasul took Ali, in kader alkhom Rasul told everyone whom ever I am his leader Ali also his leader , also tod I am the city of Knoledge and Ali is Gate of that City , Abobakr and Omar because power and Doonya delibretly disobay command of Rasul Allah , and becue those uncualified leaders today we have so many problem in the Islamic countery
@@saeedmadani7949 my dear brother, Ali was most honored and fantastic figure and leader. His deeds and god fearing was incredible, I do not disagree. where I disagree is: Who are you and me to tell who should be khalif? I do not understand this. The Sahaba and Ali himself where happy with it. Why are we making fitna and causing disunity among muslims because WE disagree with THEIR decision. Their wisdom and Taqwa was unmatched. Non of the companions wanted to be khalif, non of them wanted this responsibility. This is not like todays world, where people would do anything for a good position. When we study Hadith and their lives, we can never say they where after to be the leader, although al of them had leader character. Our beloved prophet never mentioned a successor, as we know, in Islam successor is not in the family heritage so it could be one of many. It does not matter who would become khalif, because Allah promised the muslims Rum and Fars. Und Umar Ibn Al khattab and Muawiyah the Muslims where the most successful, should I now say, they where better than Abu Bakr and Ali ? No. Because Allah Promised he would help the muslims. Thank you very much.
@@eloabdulhakeem4863 My dear Muslim brother, we have to put our differences about past too the side and think about the present and future of our religion, By study about Islam and the other religions I realize Islam is the most advanced and practical with the real history and time and most authentic Holly book (Koran) is, of course, ritual part of Islam is important but sincerity and love to Allah is more important is than just ritual, because Allah lookout to your heart than your body language and your appearance, I do not care you are Sonni or sheat, as long as you are Muslim and you care about other people especially Muslims, I love you for sake of Allah.
Very interesting historical review.
Again thank you for the history. I will use this information for my family to review of the division of the religious faith.
Dear CaspianReport, PLEASE, provide sources with respect to your explanation. The story ou are telling stems from hadith and islamic narrative for the most of it, therefore please provide actual historical scientific ressources that prove all of that. Academic books or scientific papers would be very welcome.
For all we know, very little actual documents and material proofs regarding the early islamic history exist, not to say none at all. You are welcome to take a look at Tom Holland's documentary.
agree
Not a single thing he mentioned in this video was from the Qur'an, nor from hadith. The main sources were mentioned in the beginning of the video (Ibn Ishaq, and Al-Tabari), who are also -among others- the sources that western historians relied on in documenting those events
Mohamed Mo
basically. Yet sooo many people care soooo much about this time period... when there are way more interesting time periods.
Mohamed Mo
i know, but its not even correctly documented. in my opinion there are people who have done more good then some of these historical figures. Like every time period is important but to dwell on it constantly..... like many muslims do, is a bit much...
Mohamed Mo
:)
in islam to lead people even if it is one person or two is not something which a true muslim would like to do it is a big responsibility and you will be asked abt it in judgement day so i do not think that sayidinaa Ali R.A ever loved to be the khalifah
there is none of the khulafa u rashideen who stood up and asked the people to elect him
muawiyah started that thing fighting for power and wealth
Your channel is simply awesome
Very interesting and helpful. thanks.
so shia muslims supported aristocracy
while Sunni muslims supported democracy
i think that Sunni sect is much better for Muslims than shia i dont agree with one family role because it destroys the peaceful image of islam that consider all the people are the same and equal and i think this is the reason that 97% of Muslims are sunni
Sunni does not support democracy. Sunni supports khalifah an-nubuwah (prophetic caliphate)
Your conclusion is influenced your narrow views about the issue.
1) by seniority Ali was first khalifa
2) by relation Ali was first khalifa
3) by sacrifice Ali was first khalifa.
What they did is they leftbody of Mohammad and left for occupying power.
Yousuf Malik By seniority Ali was first? What does that mean?
Shia are actually 20% I don’t know from where you got 97% lol.. by the way it’s not about quantity.. it’s like you are saying Buddhism is rite religion because they have more quantity then islam as well as Christianity
24xv555 There was no greater companion than Ali, the Prophet said he was to him like Haroon was to Musa. Ali won countless victories for the early Muslims in their first conflicts, he was the one the Prophet wanted to write up important treaties. Ali is ahead of anyone else on merit and character, and therefore by seniority, which doesn’t have to be determined by age.
My friend, you are using Shia sources.
kenzo moretti cute little crusader, remember Selahaddin?
kenzo moretti ok, this will be the 7th crusade you will loose ;)
DarkShadow64 No need for crusades any more, you people are doing a great job killing each other :)
Mina Massoud HAHAHA TROLL!!! You even have to use a fake account with a Muslim name to be taken seriously. Hahaha lmao!!
kenzo moretti No man, it is way below that :) :)
Thanks for amazing video!!!
Awesome video, I wish you would put some links regarding your sources into the video.
If the Sunni's do not think that it should be heritable then why are there many Sunni Kings in the Middle East?
cause those kings do not care about Islam and we don't pick them.
+sam h Generally speaking, the Sunni community is against the monarch. But they don't get to have a say in these matters. Moreover, the royal families are only Islamic when it suits them.
Kingdoms get kings provinces get leader war country gets dictator states president
+sam h
because humans are corrupt at the end of the day
+sam h It corruption, regardless of the fact that kings taking power simply because of their family ties is completely forbidden in Islam, this still happened because corruption
Where Hadith Says Bible is corrupted :
The Hadith (sayings and actions of Prophet Muhammad in Islam) as well point out to Biblical Corruption. Consider these hadith:
Narrated Abu Huraira: The people of the Scripture (Jews) used to recite the Torah in Hebrew and they used to explain it in Arabic to the Muslims. On that Allah's Apostle said, "Do not believe the people of the Scripture or disbelieve them, but say:-- "We believe in Allah and what is revealed to us." (2.136) (Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 12)
Narrated Ubaidullah: Ibn 'Abbas said, "Why do you ask the people of the scripture about anything while your Book (Quran) which has been revealed to Allah's Apostle is newer and the latest? You read it pure, undistorted and unchanged, and Allah has told you that the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians) changed their scripture and distorted it, and wrote the scripture with their own hands and said, 'It is from Allah,' to sell it for a little gain. Does not the knowledge which has come to you prevent you from asking them about anything? No, by Allah, we have never seen any man from them asking you regarding what has been revealed to you!" (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 92, Number 461)
Narrated 'Ubaidullah bin 'Abdullah: 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas said, "O the group of Muslims! How can you ask the people of the Scriptures about anything while your Book which Allah has revealed to your Prophet contains the most recent news from Allah and is pure and not distorted? Allah has told you that the people of the Scriptures have changed some of Allah's Books and distorted it and wrote something with their own hands and said, 'This is from Allah, so as to have a minor gain for it. Won't the knowledge that has come to you stop you from asking them? No, by Allah, we have never seen a man from them asking you about that (the Book Al-Qur'an ) which has been revealed to you. (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 93, Number 614)
What Scholars of Bible says :
The gospels are not eyewitness accounts
-Allen D. Callahan, Associate Professor of New Testament, Harvard Divinity School
Some scholars say so many revisions occurred in the 100 years following Jesus' death that no one can be absolutely sure of the accuracy or authenticity of the Gospels, especially of the words the authors attributed to Jesus himself.
-Jeffery L. Sheler, [2]
and WHAT MORE BIBLE ITSELF SPEAK ABOUT CORRUPTION :
" 'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? (Jeremiah 8:8 New International Version)
Which Part of Bible is corrupted :
Anypart which says:[my personal view]
GOD have Son.
God turned in to man.
God sent his son to die for us.
Salvation by Jesus Blood.
Every things which makes a human Equal to God.
Verse 4:136 of the Holy Quran:
"O you who have believed, believe in Allah and His Messenger and the Book that He sent down upon His Messenger and the Scripture which He sent down before. And whoever disbelieves in Allah, His angels, His books, His messengers, and the Last Day has certainly gone far astray."
After this they may Ask ,if Bible is corrupted then Why Quran says "Ask People of Book" :
so read this note for the answer :
Why Quran says "Ask People of Book"
Abrogation in Bible
Who Corrupted the Gospel
Quran Verse Eaten By God ?
MORE QUERIES ? MORE CLAIMS ? Pls Post it..We will love to Answer !
Hmm, interesting
U don't have basic human reasoning n u are living in complete hallucination , praising the most Evil man ever born....our scriptures told about Muhammad n his level of evilness .....8,000 yrs before his birth.!
Mbathroom1 racism is wrong why can't we all be friendly
Akash Bhardwaj same to u
So muslims give alot to charity, and...? Anyways those stats could be exaggerated. Muslim civilization speaks for itself. Once muslims had full control of their lands, gradual decline was already underway. Even today the rich countries of the gulf aren't places that attract anyone for reasons other than getting a good share of that oil money. Also within the gulf states there are declining birth rates and an inability to embrace and evolve technology, arabs need lots of labourers to compensate for the work they are too proud to do.
In the new testament it talks about pointing out the spec in the eye of your neighbour while ignoring the plank within your own. Christianity has nothing to prove, we don't need to cite statistics, plenty of muslims are fleeing their lands for those of the Christians. Doesn't that speak for itself? islam has been around for over 1000 years, and it is a very political religion, so why hasn't allah's will been done and a truly global caliphate been created? Why has Christianity touched and left it's mark on every continent while the only way muslims exist in the americas and oceania is through the mercy of christians?
really appreciate the information.
This is great, good job
This history is from the shia point of view. This is not an islamic history but how shias put the history is. very biased and not accurate.
wrong abu baker was the first muslim after muhmed pbuh ali was the first kid to be a muslim but abu baker was the first muslim ever after the prophet
عبدالله .الشمري Abu bakr was actually the 40th-50th muslim, both Zayd and Bilal were muslim before him because he was out of town by the first revelation. There is not a single hadith that ever associates Abu Bakr as being first anything other than thefirst caliph.
Tabari quotes from Muhammad Bin Sa'ad Bin Abi Waqqas:
I asked my father whether Abu Bakr was the first of the Muslims. He said, 'No, more than fifty people embraced Islam before Abu Bakr; but he was superior to us as a Muslim. And Umar ibn Khattab had embraced Islam after forty-five men and twenty-one women. As for the foremost one in the matter of Islam and faith, it was Ali ibn Abi Talib.'
Also I don't think you understand the meaning of male, just because you're a kid doesn't mean you are not male. This sunni and shia bullshit of distorting facts really makes your side look insecure.
The fact you clarified Roman Empire = Byzantine Empire makes me happy :)
Thank you for this presentation - very good. I wish more people would a least try to understand how we arrived at this cross roads in our history.
this report has a lot of false information. For example, the first man to believe in Islam and endorse it was Abu Bakr Alsiddiq. BTW Alsiddiq is a nickname that the prophet gave him for how much abu bakr has believed in him
when the Mohammed (peace be upon him) was sick he ordered abu bakr to pray and be the Imam on his behalf, so what does that mean?
If you did some real research and gthered REAL info this video would've been decent and not offensive
sn3o0os So where was Abu Bakr in Zul Asheera?
Jarri Abidi what is zul asheera?
Abu Abu It is when the Holy Prophet first revealed himself as a Prophet in public.
This is when the verse came, "And warn, [O Muhammad], your closest kindred. (26:214).
He gathered Bani Hashim in the house of Abu Talib. He told them who he is, and then asked who will help him for which the reward is being his vicegerent. That is when a 10 year old Imam Ali ibn Abu Talib stood up, just like he would later stand up during Khandaq when the Prophet asked the people who will shut the dog's (Amr ibn Abd Wud's) mouth.
The rest of Bani Hashim laughed at him, at Ali ibn Abu Talib, and at Abu Talib ibn Muttalib.
Jarri Abidi your story doesn't have any essential not prove historically you should do deep resource if you want share information again!!!!!!!!!??!!
Abu baker was the first adult male to enter islam and protected the prophit throughout his life and was much wiser than ali, since you're a shiee i can get why you even mentioned the ali part, islam is about unity not blood relation
Brother u dumb? How can he be wiser? ALI WAS SINLESS he was raised in Mohammeds pbhu household. Before islam all ur chaliphs were praying to stone...exept who? Ali
***** it doesn't specifically refer to ali (the verses you quoted).
The verse referring to abu bakr is 9:40 this is when the prophet (s.a.w) left makkah with abu bakr and they entered the cave.
48:18 refers to a large group of the sahabas including ali saying that Allah is pleased with them.
9:100 is another reference praising the migrants from makkah again Allah being pleased and promising them Jannah.
You also made a reference of the prophets daughter.......Ruqayyah married Uthman, Umm kulthum was also married to Uthman.
The prophet married the daughter of Abu bakr (Aisha), the daughter of Umar (Hafsa).
Ali also named 3 of his sons (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman) I mean if this is not praise enough for you then you are in straight denial
Abu Bakr was also the first person who began campaign to spread Islam by power of sword, he might have been a better politician than Ali, but he changed the ways of Islam and might be one of the reason why Middle East is in chaos now!
KingExituS The prophet was the one who sent an expedition to attack the romans after their ally (Ghassanids) attacked the muslims and abu bakr took charge of it after his death. The prophet (s.a.w) also ordered the attack on mussailima in najd and abu bakr finished it, etc. Do you not know the history of Islam??
KizaruD The invasion of neighbouring states have not much to do with battle of Mutah, Muhammad never began a war, the first two Caliphs did, their main purpose was to expand their Empire, Abu Bakr used the opportunity of long wars between Persians and Romans, and began to invade weakly protected Persian territories in Mesopotamia.
I know more than history of Islam, unlike you probably, so i can notice the resemblance with the similar situations in history done by others to expand their territories!
i love the caspian report
thanks for the video