Regarding the pricing mentioned at 0:54, the specific Style test vehicle being reviewed here is priced at $38,890, before on-road costs. But it's worth noting a new example of the Style will cost you $39,790 at the time of publishing, as its price has since ours was 'delivered'.
I had one of these, the City Life spec, as a rental last year in Tasmania. I was quite impressed with it. Ample power, comfortable, road and steered well. I had it in Launceston for two days then drove it to Hobart and it cruised do to there very well and for the rest of the week. I don't recall the fuel consumption, but it only used about 40L during the week. PS. Did you choose the nail polish to match the car's colour?
I drove a base model Kona and a base model T-Roc and the T-Roc demolished the Kona. The T-Roc also benefits from using a reliable Asian 8 speed torque converter auto (Toyota gearbox) and the proven and debugged 1.4T EA211 engine. The VW was also better built with impressive fit and finish and it managed to look better inside and out (subjective I know).
Sure i agree tar better than the Mazda cx30 and Hyu kona . Untill the warranty expires then you want to off load it only to discover valuation has fallen off a cliff as the used car market does not go seeking a used 6yo euro with over 100km
True, however I picked mine up at $36,990 drive away with 3 years servicing thrown in. I'm ahead by around $6K over a comparable Japanese or Korean SUV so I can take a hit on resale.
The Audi Q2 has a far better interior and is of a far superior quality compared to the low rent, inferior interior of the T Rock that VW thinks it can get away with. The T Rocks exterior styling looks good but that’s it…the interior and drive of the Audi Q2 is far better….
And about 10k more expensive. I prefer the Audi as well, but its not exactly a like for like comparison based on price. The skoda karoq would be a better compare.
In comparison with other German Brands like Audi, BMW and Mercedes etc I feel like Volkswagen is Versatile waste in its Design Dimension and Exterior ,’-)
![NEW Volkswagen T-Roc 2024 [1.5 TSI 150hp] |0-100| POV Test Drive #2099 Joe Black](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HFJgt6Gs0NI/mqdefault.jpg)
Regarding the pricing mentioned at 0:54, the specific Style test vehicle being reviewed here is priced at $38,890, before on-road costs. But it's worth noting a new example of the Style will cost you $39,790 at the time of publishing, as its price has since ours was 'delivered'.
I had one of these, the City Life spec, as a rental last year in Tasmania. I was quite impressed with it. Ample power, comfortable, road and steered well. I had it in Launceston for two days then drove it to Hobart and it cruised do to there very well and for the rest of the week. I don't recall the fuel consumption, but it only used about 40L during the week.
PS. Did you choose the nail polish to match the car's colour?
I drove a base model Kona and a base model T-Roc and the T-Roc demolished the Kona. The T-Roc also benefits from using a reliable Asian 8 speed torque converter auto (Toyota gearbox) and the proven and debugged 1.4T EA211 engine. The VW was also better built with impressive fit and finish and it managed to look better inside and out (subjective I know).
Good review, nice. How tall are you, checking rear legroom space? It looked like you had ample legroom.
Hi Richard, Chris is 180 cm tall.
Your fingernails match the car , is that optional
😂
Sure i agree tar better than the Mazda cx30 and Hyu kona . Untill the warranty expires then you want to off load it only to discover valuation has fallen off a cliff as the used car market does not go seeking a used 6yo euro with over 100km
True, however I picked mine up at $36,990 drive away with 3 years servicing thrown in. I'm ahead by around $6K over a comparable Japanese or Korean SUV so I can take a hit on resale.
The Audi Q2 has a far better interior and is of a far superior quality compared to the low rent, inferior interior of the T Rock that VW thinks it can get away with. The T Rocks exterior styling looks good but that’s it…the interior and drive of the Audi Q2 is far better….
And about 10k more expensive.
I prefer the Audi as well, but its not exactly a like for like comparison based on price.
The skoda karoq would be a better compare.
LOL have fun going bankrupt servicing an Audi. Their reliability is a complete joke.
Any audi below a q5 isn't worth the price tag.
A
In comparison with other German Brands like Audi, BMW and Mercedes etc I feel like Volkswagen is Versatile waste in its Design Dimension and Exterior ,’-)