Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team: czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html A related list: czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
@@bradcrane4706 I learned the hard way when I was young making almost $6k -8k month with commission and majority time I was claiming exempt and getting my fat bonuses. I remember before I claimed exempt I would let them tax me it was 30% of my pay check so if I made $5k they take out $1500 like wtf but I claimed exempt I got all my money but I got fucked at the end I paid over $10l in taxes
@@octavianbalenciaga6799 , even so. I was an FBI agent assigned to the Dallas office in the 80’s and I would estimate that more than half of the agents assigned there at the time thought the Warren Report was BS. I used to drive home on JFK’s assassination route on Elm St. every day, right past the grassy knoll. It was hard not to think about it every once in a while.
Carlos “Gunny” Hathcock, sniper (USMC), the Marine Corps’ premier sniper with 93 confirmed kills including history’s longest single kill-shot of 2,500 meters, nominated for the Congressional Medal of Honor for action in Vietnam, former chief instructor of the USMC Sniper’s School, at Quantico, Virginia. (Note: Gunny Hathcock proved the impossibility of the lone-nutter scenario during tests he personally conducted at Quantico, Hathcock's own words... "Let me tell you what we did at Quantico. We reconstructed the whole thing: the angle, the range, the moving target, the time limit, the obstacles, everything. I don't know how many times we tried it, but we couldn't duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did".
Oswald literally missed a general sitting by a window at his desk and we are lead to believe he hit a moving target from a sixth floor window three times? NO WAY. Doesn't jive. This isn't talked about enough. The Carcano rifle is a giant POS, too.
Even out here in Australia, both my Dad and Grandad said JFK's assassination sent a shiver down their spines, not just because of the shocking public murder, but also because as outsiders looking in, it was clear to them this was a highly orchestrated event, they never believed Oswald getting off all of those "perfect" shots. Grandad led heavy machine gun battalion in WW2 in Middle East, and Dad served reconnaissance in Vietnam, so I naturally listened when they spoke on these matters.
Everyone (Oz, EU, Canada) thinks it was a coup d'etat, except for the here in the US, where the MSM and govt' keep feeding us the same line of propaganda, coverup, and lies they fed us in '63!
Show both them this, this is the missing part they never seen. Type this guys name in and it still doesn't come up. czcams.com/video/58xhXSAZJog/video.html
And yet the same forces are getting your country to fight China in the future. As long as the war isn't on US soil. These guys in the US government will always push for more war. They don't care about nukes. They are willing to play crazy games to win if they killed the president, got away with it and stayed in power. They have never got any consequence from their actions.
Well he certainly isn't feeling Joe Rogan's claim as to what a good shot is. Unfortunately Joe you don't have clout just because you're "a hunter". I think Mr. Stone did a good job of deflecting at a time when Joe was most passionate.
I was an FBI agent, assigned to the Dallas office is the 80’s, (Bobby Gillam ” was the SAC, for my bona fides), and most of the agents didn’t even think Oswald acted alone.
Lee did act alone, innocent men are not silenced for knowing nothing. Lee fired two bullets, the first missed and the second went straight through JFK and Connely who was sitting inboard and lower than the President on a jumpseat. The third round was a Remington .223 frag round which exploded Kennedy's skull, instantly killing the 35th President of the United States. Oswald had a birds eye view from the sixth floor corner window, witnessed the origin of the third bullet. Lee had to be silenced.
Based on my research, it is unlikely Oswald acted at all. Very Best Regards, Tom Scott Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System _Our American Injustice System_ _Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
I really cannot stand Joe, he just has amazing guests and great topics so I only care to listen to his guests so this is frustrating to me as well when he opens his mouth at all.
@@jpete3027666I’m in the same boat. Though I will say not every guest is a winner but when he brings a good one on he talks over them for 80% of the episode.
CA mafia, cuba, CIA were all involved, Read the book Plausible Denial by Mark Lane, he won a court case by proving Howard Hunt managed the hit. Lane also had been head of House Committee of Assassinations
That book contains a very telling, off-hand comment made by Allen Dulles (to a writer who was helping him), spoken with contempt: "That little Kennedy---he thought he was a god."
@Anakin - Seating arrangement (boosted seat) doesn't explain a nearly pristine bullet suddenly appearing on the gurney. And nice try with the old "mentally ill conspiracy retards" name-calling routine, but that trick doesn't work any more.
Anakin lol that’s an interesting take...personally I can understand your point if someone is overly engrossed in conspiracy theories constantly, that will drive people mad....but this was a major situation, so if people want to dig into researching and discussing it, why do you care? You realize humans are social creatures? We like to communicate about big and small issues...and you’re on the same thread lol
JFK single handedly prevented nuclear war. He was a hero on the battlefield and in the Oval office. He was a great great man. He did NOT deserve to die like that. RIP Mr President
Not single-handedly. That is an extremely childish way to look at it. He had a team that understood and fought for him and gave him the solutions to eventually go that route. He wavered back and forth many times. His leadership was huge, but single-handedly? No.
Joe saying he can judge a person's character based on their reactions to conspiracy theories (in this case JFK's murder) is something I never thought of, but absolutely seems telling to me. It reveals someone's nature in response to something that isn't cut and dry. Not even so much the response, but rather the reasoning that brought them to their thoughts will apply to other situations. Almost want to call it a litmus test, except not so binary with a large grey area.
@@darylfernandez2153eah, i saw that rabbit hole. Its not very believable in my eyes that he was a persona for a ghost writer. His name existed back then in the right areas. Also, dont call people dumb for disagreeing with you. Thats asinine, even if he insulted you first.
Rumor has it that’s because Bush Sr. was named in some contexts as one of the “architects”. I’m probably spreading disinformation but, Bush’s CIA did it!
The fact that they keep refusing to release everything says a lot. Somebody has something to hide. They are probably stalling until everyone involved is dead.
Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team: czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html A related list: czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
@@lucasoheyze4597 You're a damn fool if you think Garrison was bullshitting and dont beleive that main stream depiction of the trial rom back in the day, Garrison sued them amd won over that
While I appreciate JR keeping this discussion in the public domain here, watching him talk to Stone about the JFK assassination is a bit amusing. He seems like a student in class talking to a veteran teacher about something the guy's taught hundreds of times. Stone is game but it's easy to see he's being a bit polite as JR talks about guns.
Like what? The Magic Bullet conspiracy theory has already been debunked. Even the federal government changed its official position from the lone gunman conspiracy theory to a theory that there was probably a conspiracy to assassinate.@@TruthDissident
4.9 seconds for the time between 2nd and 3rd shot? Based on Zapruder of course. What's so hard to beleive about that? The Brits used to train for a 'mad minute' of accurate fire from a bolt action service rifle, over 100 years ago. A rate of fire (also hitting the target of course) with an average of less than two seconds between shots was not out of the question. 300 yard range. Tests were done at the time after the assasination using a similar rifle as Oswald's and the results showed it could be done, many of the shooters taking less than 6 seconds total to fire three rounds. Jamming was encoutnered by the tests but that doesn;t mean Oswald's rifle jammed. Could _Oswald_ have done it? Open for a lot of debate. He wasn't a world-calss marksman. But could he do it fast? Sure why not. Yes, Hathcock said it couldn't be done. He meant couldn't be done while hitting the target, demonstrably and as a matter of record that rate of fire can be had with a bolt action. You can see the videos on youtube lol. But what if what Oswald hit didn't matter? An lot has been said about his terrible first shot. Well. A first shot miss actually isn't uncommon among target shooters who make the mistake of taking the first shot with a nice clean bore. You actually want the barrel slightly fouled. But what if Oswald and his crappy Carcano did what you'd expect and miss his target every time? Then the question about rate of fire becomes easy: yes he could fire it that fast. Since it is, I hope, your opinion that Oswald certainly did not act alone, this supports the idea that the fatal shots came from someplace else. Where did Oswald's bullets go? Can't say. But it's easy for me to accept he missed.
@@bbb462cid 3 reports. 1- pause and then 2-3 on top of each other. Amost simultaneously. That Carcano rifle has a long bolt throw making that sequence of fire impossible. Don't be a schill.
There was a documentary back in early 90s or late 80s were they cover all the questionable facts they had a skilled rifleman not snipper perform the three shots hit all three with a 1/2 second to spare I believe he used the same rifle
Not true when it's Stone who took liberties with "truths" and inserts them into the movie. Trouble is, people are then on the hook to research and find out what was true and what took liberties and is misinformation in the movie.
@@justincase4812 stone pretty much nailed it. The official version was never accepted. Stone just took the conclusion the majority of people felt . He made a great movie that pissed off the establishment .
If anything, fighting in a war that was somewhat and became more unpopular as it went along doesn’t really help that case. Especially once documents showing the government had been selling the people an overly Rodney picture and they were privately doubtful they they could win in Vietnam, as they were fighting it. Being disillusioned and cynical, or at least having good reason to doubtful of government use of military power doesn’t mean it doesn’t too far. If someone has decided, or has the genuine feeling that it’s all a lie(the war) then everything else is easy to cast doubt on… even when the telling of the JFK story goes beyond critical of government and into being driven by things other than fact….
A big question that never gets asked is why Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald. Everybody writes it off as him being emotionally driven because he loved Kennedy, but let's be real, Lee Harvey Oswald being able to talk about what happened would have blown everyone involved out of the water.
So you dismiss the comments of those around him very often if what type of person he was simply by saying “buts be real”. The people who knew ruby were being real. Ruby hung around that police station often, they knew him. He was a highly emotional man. He was seen crying in public and made many emotional phone calls after the assassination. “Let’s be real” should mean go where the evidence leads, not let’s make a good story
Allen Dulles was on fire as the head of the CIA along with his brother, John Foster, who was Secretary of State at the SAME time. Both dudes began their careers as corporate lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell and continued protecting those clients’ international interests throughout their time in government. 1953 on behalf of United Fruit Company and 1954 in Iran on behalf of what is now know as BP. Both democratically elected leaders of those countries wanted to nationalize the natural resources of those countries to benefit their citizens. The CIA protected corporate interests instead. These are only 2 of many examples. When they tried to do the same thing in Cuba JFK refused to call in the military to support the fledgling coup. It was the first failure on the part of the CIA and a major blow to Dulles’ reputation. JFK fired Dulles which in hindsight was not a very smart move considering the dude had spent the past decade developing the skill and network to assassinate political opponents and overthrow governments. Obviously there’s quite a bit more to the story but this is a good starting point for anyone wanting to understand where we are today politically and how we got here.
I don't agree, the air cover aspect of The Bay of Pigs invasion was a blunder. Kennedy ok'd the Bay of Pigs, as long as there was plausible denial(of the mission). It failed! Hence the 'fire-ing' of Allen Dulles. Everything above that is correct. Before making the "BAD CAPITOLIST" case. Think about what kind of danger Communist-Cuba posed. Missle Crisis?
There is also the small matter of JFK wanting to: inspect the Dimona reactor in Israel, supporting Algerian independence, registering AIPAC under FARA, giving Palestinians the right of return and get closer to Gamal Nasser in Egypt. All of this changed AFTER he was murdered.
@Irving Ceron He's not but he's done considerably more research than Joe and has a substantially more qualified opinion on the subject. However, Joe's skepticism is one of his best traits.
Because the dude has done jack shit for research "No marksman in the world could've made that shot" czcams.com/video/ghmY6HmR4fs/video.html With ONE search. Two guys hit 2/3 shots, and one hit 3/3 perfectly.
"The bullet hitting those two people and finding it's way onto the gurney, magically, with very little distortion in the bullet at all, is straight up HORSESHIT"
Joe was getting a little worked up on his beliefs. Mr Stone keeping his demeanor calm and not letting his beliefs get infront of him well done Mr. Stone. Joe is a measured guy in most situations but when his beliefs get the best of him his voice gets louder and he gets determined to be right.
Josh my brother, I feel ya man. Check out the two videos I posted above and read the Warren Report regarding the so called "magic bullet." Dopey Joe and Oliver are so misguided and on the fringe of tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist peeps. Peace! See the videos where Joe also believed in BigFoot and questioned the moon landing.
I caught this too.. I've defended Rogan from other commenters who always says he changes his perspective based on his guest.. Then the CIA agent video came out and I was like.. Damn he does do that crap.
I visited Dealy Plaza in Dallas last weekend, 12-11-23. Something I've always wanted to do since the 1st time I saw the Zapruder film in 1981. I never believed Ozwald pulled that off because I grew up shooting guns and know a little about how an object moves when shot. It's very eerie standing on the concrete platform where Zapruder and his secretary did. After seeing it in person, it's crazy how close Z was to the JFK! Looks way further on film. If you ever visit Dealy Plaza, it's plain to see where the head shot came from.
There is an old interview of witness Lee Bowers and a recent interview with journalist Robert McNeil who was there. Both describe the spacing of the THREE shots EXACTLY the same way. The 2nd and 3rd were almost right on top of each other. There was no way the 2nd and 3rd shots came from the same bolt action rifle and it's pretty unlikely that the 1st and 2nd shots did.
A Secret Service agent in the following car accidentally fired his M-16 as he was bringing the rifle up in response to the shots from behind, hitting JFK in the head, killing him...a 1 in a million, accidental shot from a Secret Service agent unfamiliar with the then, new M-16.
@Taylor Lemoine if they can kill a president.. And its an US president. Then what makes you so hard to believe 9/11 was inside job? Or are you just those guys who would believe everything the media tells you?
I didn't really know a lot about Oliver Stone before watching this other than he's a fabulous film director, but Jfc, my guys a national treasure. A real seeker of the truth.
He gets visibly excited every time he talks about the JFK assassination on the podcast. He’s pretty knowledgeable on it and seems passionate whenever he talks about it for sure
If Oswald acted alone, why would an eye witness with clear vision and nothing to gain state that he heard a gunshot and saw smoke from behind the wooden fence? Why would two officers immediate race up the hill toward the fence?
Why would people run in lots of strange directions? Why would people report hearing the sound coming from many different directions in a large open area with multiple story buildings reflecting the sound amidst panic. Oswald was in the book depository and shot kennedy
@@totallybored5526 of Oswald tried to shoot jfk when he was “straight” in front of him(as in, if Oswald’s shoulders are parallel to the school book depository and jfk is within thr buildings frame/umbral/outline) then it’s a harder shot. JFK would have been moving faster a-crossed Oswald than when JFK is further away and JFK would be more in profile so would be smaller target If that makes sense.
The greatest injustice because millions of Americans believe a conspiracy when there is not one shred of hard evidence to support a conspiracy. Oswald acted alone and millions of Americans will never believe it because of frauds like oliver stone that perpetrate lies and ignore all the hard evidence.
All the "hard evidence" provided by the prime suspect in the crime: the government itself. "We investigated ourselves and found that we did nothing wrong." Whoever believes that hard evidence cen exist in this case after the Dallas PD, Secret Service, FBI, CIA and other officials actively destroyed the crime scene with their utter stupidity and incompetence is a bonafide moron.
@@harbingerofsalt Read what you wrote here. It makes no sense, and your ability to communicate your thoughts is terrible. It's totally unclear what you are trying to say. What does the word "cen" mean? What evidence do you have that the FBI, CIA destroyed the crime scene? It was Dallas PD that was at crime scene and it was not destroyed by anyone.
@@Rayburn58 lol you know damn well it was a typo and I meant to say "can". Tell me I make no sense and can't communicate and that's the one example you can come up with. Pathetic
I get that it is not impossible, but the popular that a trained soldier was still a poor marksman a couple years earlier, trained relentlessly to get good, used a suboptimal weapon, took the shots at the time when it would be hardest to hit the target from his position, hit some extremely difficult shots, fired the shots very rapidly, the bullets took a very unlikely trajectory, the bullet was not deformed in the least despite breaking through multiple bones and the killer was assassinated before he could be fully interrogated seems less likely than “he didn’t act alone.”
It's also very unlikely that a second shooter went completely undetected and nobody ever talked. Keep in mind, witnesses were not unanimous in the number of shots that were heard. 3 was the most commonly heard number. Witnesses don't all agree on the placement of the shooter, which makes sense given how hard it is to locate a shooter with echo. However, almost all witnesses point to ONE gunman either at the TSBD or grassy knoll. Virtually nobody heard multiple shooters at multiple locations. There are only unlikely scenarios that could've happened. Oswald being the lone gunman has a lot of things going against it but none rule it out.
Just watch the Zapruder film that shows Connally was hit seconds later by a different bullet and shows the fatal shot to the head came from the front. Dozens of people and officers ran toward the grassy knoll.
@@DutchMadness77nobody who saw the men [plurual] in the TSBD 6th-floor window testified they were shooting. But a few did see one man holding what appeared to be a rifle with another man standing next to the 'rifleman' in the window. The shots were in salvos. Two to three shots in each salvo were fired simultaneously in three volleys. The vast majority of witnesses heard shots coming from the North Grassy Knoll; a few stated they saw a man behind the knoll 'possibly' shooting at the president. Again, none saw anyone shooting from the TSBD. But some witnesses heard shots from the direction of the TSBD along with the North Grassy Knoll. That said, an independent researcher from England began a series of experiments and interviews to determine where the shots that actually hit JFK and Connelly originated to quantify or dismiss the conspiracy theories. e.g., kneck, back, chest, head, thigh, and what most people forget the front window of the president's car. His findings are called the South Knoll Gunmen theory. He uses mathematical computations and eye and earwitness testimony to test the available evidence. As well as recorded interviews with a military covert intelligence asset [Tosh Plumlee], who was not only there in Dealey Plaza along with his team that day but was tasked with stopping the assassination by his CIA handler. The results of the experiments and Plumlee's testimonials are disturbing, and I refused to believe them for a long time. Plumlee has gone on the record, risking his freedom and safety with what he did for the CIA/DIA/State Department. Plumlee has also testified before the US Congress about his actions not only on that day but also his activities during the Iran/Contra Affair. That recorded testimony is still classified under the grounds of National Security more than 35 years later! Ask yourself this. If the fatal headshot originated from the right side of the limo at an elevated position on a downward trajectory [North Grassy Knoll ], why didn't the round exit through the left side of Kennedy's head or neck? Being a former Combat Medical Specialist and a lifelong shooter, my experience suggests the exit wound should have exited near his left ear, or an exit wound should have been at the back lower left side of his cerebellum. Instead, the exit wound was on the right side of his head, a few centimeters from the midline. During the announcement that the president received a coup de gras at his right temple near the hairline by the assistant press secretary (pointing to the entrance wound on his head), the angle from the North Grassy Knoll didn't make sense. To be clear, the researcher does not claim there weren't shooters at the North Grassy Knoll or in the buildings behind JFK; in fact, he states there is more than enough available evidence to prove there were. But he claims through his experiments that the neck wound to JFK and the head wound to JFK came not from any of these sources but from the South Grassy Knoll. Here are two links I suggest you take a look at. midnightwriternews.com/the-south-knoll-gunman/ czcams.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/video.html
All those events are as clear to me today as when they happened. Even as a ten year old i knew oswald was just what he said he was a patsy or fall guy.
its a helluva shot that the three shots were made with spot on accuracy from a man who, while qualifying in boot camp, was barely able to make Sharpshooter ranking in the Marine Corps marksmanship qualification. Sharpshooter is the middle or "second place" shooting rank awarded to Marines in Bootcamp and in the Fleet. It incredibly easy to make unless you have almost no skill in shooting. Oswald might have shot a rifle as a child since that generation probably had to hunt for their food quite a bit. That being said however, there is no indication that Oswald would have had the capability to make such a shot with a rifle of that age.
@Steve Stevinson wow. It's not but you do have to practice. The point behind this is that it is not a skill taught in boot camp. Oswald wasn't a hunter (either recreational or occupational), nor did he practice shooting at any known point to a necessary degree in his life. So, how does a man, with no significant degree of skill in advanced shooting techniques, hit a moving target, multiple times, including the head?
The thing that really weirded me out was that one of the officers in the book depository identified the weapon as a Mauser rifle. He was former sporting goods store owner and knew the model. His partner checked the barrel and indeed confirmed it was a German Mauser rifle. This was in their reporting. Somewhere between that and ‘what really happened’ it became an Italian Manliker Carcano rifle.
@@tacticalmattfoley Dear God, that story came from demonstrable serial liar Roger Craig, who later changed his account so the roof rifle disappeared from his story and the Mannlicher transforms into a Mauser. Unbelievable that clown was given an ounce of crediblilty.
@@aaronz7056 I'm just repeating what was in Stone's new documentary. I will say this after having seen the "shooter's box" in the Book Depository Building: unless he was literally hanging out of the window, I just don't see how Oswald made that shot from there.
@@tacticalmattfoley He did it and witnesses (Brennan, Couch, etc.) plainly saw the rifle sticking out of the window. Do not trust Stone. He championed himself as a crusader for truth and justice for Kennedy while happily manufacturing a fake story that lets his murderer off the hook, slanders a lot of innocent people (eg, the cops who risked their lives to capture Oswald alive in the theater) as being co-conspirators to murder and treason, and packs more than 80 *demonstrable* lies into the narrative.
Stephen King said while researching the book that he arrived at the conclusion that Oswalt acted alone, despite previously believing it was a cover-up. I'd like him to speak more on the topic of why his opinion changed and what evidence he looked at.
@@McJerkins Nah, that's a hoax apparently, although I'm sure you'll tell me why it's just the lizard people trying to cover up facts. Pretty sure they are listed in his "black book" which was basically just a rolodex of famous people. Trump is in it too. Epstein was very powerful and wealthy and probably attended many social functions over the years - it's not surprising that he'd trade business cards with celebs. I think the people who were actually on the flight logs (iirc, Kevin Spacey, Clinton, Woody Allen among others) have some explaining to do, but just because a celebrity made it into his rolodex doesn't mean shit.
one of the Doctors that treated JFK at Parkland hospital wrote a book in which he stated that both of the shots that killed JFK came from the front. He also treated Oswald. While treating Oswald he said Lyndon Johnson called him and told him to say that Oswald confessed to killing JFK before he died. The day that JFK was shot Robert Kennedy contacted the CIA and asked them if they did it. Allen Dulles was fired by Kennedy from the CIA. It curious that LBJ would assign him to the Warren commission.
There is a long line of potential arrangers/wanting Kennedy dead within Government circles. All of the nonsense about Mafia/Castro/Russia/my mother's tortoise was deliberately put out there by the masters of lies; The CIA. LBJ. Dulles. Le May. Those are the three I suspect were behind it and it would not have been difficult for them to get it done. In fact, it would have been a very easy operation for the CIA. This is why so many documents relating to JFK murder are still not released. It would show the world what it already knows; The CIA causes 50%+ of the world's evil shit and should be dismantled.
Even more curious that Dulles was at a CIA safehouse known as the Farm when the assassination occurred and when the CIA head of the assassination department flew into Dallas a few weeks before.
When you watch the Z-film enough times, you realize that JFK was the target of a triangulated ambush; 3 different directions/shooters laid in such a way so as to NOT be shooting toward each other; similar to an "x,y,z, axis " milling machine. That way, since there is an extremely small "engagement window", once the shooting starts, ALL THREE shooters fire AT THE SAME TIME. Without a doubt JFK was struck 3X. One struck the Lincoln, photographed; one was a miss, and on struck Connally. It was NOT the same one the hit JFK. Connally got his OWN bullet, and it DID NOT hit JFK first. Not enough damage to the bullet to have hit two men at the same time.
The Shooter movie maybe depicts what Oswald went through, maybe he was hired to protect JFK from a suspected shooter and finally he was turned into the suspect and killed before he could talk.
Bugliosi claims the bullets that killed JFK were traced to Oswald's rifle. I haven't read Bugliosi's book but I have my doubts. Even so, a crack marksman could have shot Oswald's rifle, then let Oswald take the heat, get silenced by Ruby, and history's none the wiser. If Oswald hadn't shot Tippit, Oswald prob could have beaten any JFK charge, or might not have been charged, for the assorted reasons that many don't think he could have fired the shots and run down to the lunchroom and calmly stood there when the police officer first saw him. A skilled trial lawyer would have shown reasonable doubt in that set of facts.
@@roberttheodorson1770 Super cringey. I was so ready for Joe to stop saying the shot was possible. I felt like Oliver was like, "This guy has no idea what he's talking about"
@@Peppersfirst I know what Rogan meant, luck happens, or luck can happen. But that doesn't mean it did, and when we look at most other things in the universe we accept probabilistic logic. The weird thing is how the other bullets were solid, but the last kill shot that appeared to come from the front was a fragmenting bullet. Also, we have to assume that mixed in with all the honest "conspiracy theorists" who honestly want to solve this or add to the thinking on the case, there are undoubtedly agents of whatever entity posting ideas, facts and fake evidence to throw everyone off.
@@justgivemethetruth Oswald was the only killer, people just like to imagine a conspiracy because Kennedy was "important" and shouldn't have been killed by a narcissistic wingnut. The bullet evidence is clear that the "magic bullet" only hit soft tissue and thus the deformation of the bullet was consistent with the end appearance of the bullet. The bullets for the rifle Oswald used varied in quality so that some fragmented and others didn't.
Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team: czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html A related list: czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
Joe got so worked up about the magic bullet theory, even his little "oohh" at 2:35 sounded angry 😂. And then contrast it with how Oliver Stone is speaking.
My Girlfriend - " Joes headphones were not centered the entire time. " Me - " Did you catch they were going to blow a plane up and make up death certificates for fictitious people? " My Girlfriend (actual answer, while staring at the screen) - " yeah, someone needs to tell him." Me - " Well dear god honey i hope they do."
Allen Dulles was on it 😄 of course Meyer Lanky related people were, La Cosa Nostra has massive power. Hope your not trying to go all anti semite, youll never get close to getting down to the bottom of it Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team: czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html A related list: czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
Who? ________________________ Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the United States(chairman) (1891-1974) Richard Russell Jr. (D-Georgia), U.S. Senator, (1897-1971) John Sherman Cooper (R-Kentucky), U.S. Senator (1901-1991) Hale Boggs (D-Louisiana), U.S. Representative, House Majority Whip (1914-1972) Gerald Ford (R-Michigan), U.S. Representative (later 38th President of the United States), House Minority Leader (1913-2006) Allen Dulles, former Director of Central Intelligenceand head of the Central Intelligence Agency (1893-1969) John J. McCloy, former President of the World Bank (1895-1989) General counsel J. Lee Rankin (1907-1996) Assistant counsel Francis W. H. Adams (1904-1990) Joseph A. Ball (1902-2000) David W. Belin (1928-1999) William Thaddeus Coleman Jr. (1920-2017) Melvin A. Eisenberg Burt W. Griffin Leon D. Hubert, Jr. Albert E. Jenner Jr. (1907-1988) Wesley J. Liebeler (1931-2002) Norman Redlich (1925-2011) W. David Slawson Arlen Specter (1930-2012) Samuel A. Stern Howard P. Willens (liaison with the Department of Justice) Staff Philip Barson Edward A. Conroy John Hart Ely (1938-2003) Alfred Goldberg Murray J. Laulicht Arthur J. Marmor Richard M. Mosk (1939-2016) John J. O'Brien (1919-2001) Stuart R. Pollak (1937-) Alfredda Scobey Charles N. Shaffer, Jr. Lloyd L. Weinreb (1936-)
What do you mean by this? is “asleep” supposed to be the opposite of “woke” ... cuz nowadays ppl who claim to be woke seem to be the most in need of a long nap...
@@TheJPSouza Wall Street really good, and prescient for what would happen to this country with the hedge funders and big banks, "greed is good".. could be this country's motto today
As seen in the film, Oswald and some of the others involved were connected to the Civil Air Patrol (CAP). Civil Air Patrol was and remains a CIA recruitment front. The primary co-founder of the Civil Air Patrol was David Byrd. The owner of the Six-Floor Book Depository building was David Byrd.
yep and a moving target which the road has a 20 degree downhill slope and also that it winds like a snake as well, tell me as a shooter and sniper all those facts need to be calculated the scope was misaligned, its was at least 4" to the left and the same high, now even if you drop that same rifle the scope is not going to move that much, the fbi had to put 3 metal shims under it just to make it accurate to fire and they say that a ln did this shooting with that rifle total and utter bs, you need custom rounds with highly skilled snipers its that simple, Carlos harthcock could not do it even if he tried with that weapon totaly impossible its that simple and the most important fact is that the back wound in jfk had no exit point at all and this is right out of the autopsy report he had minor bruising on the inside of the chest wall no exit point for the bullet which they say hit jfk in the back 5 and 3/4 inch's down and 1" to the right of the midline of his back?
@@7071t6 the kick back and operating the bolt after each shot means you have to refocus your eye through the sight. Why pass up an easier shot as the car is coming toward him on Houston st.?
He did try and shoot while the car was right below the window. His first shot hit the top of the traffic light instead and ricocheted down the street hitting the sidewalk, cutting that guys cheek with concrete chip. The second shot plowed through both men as Connolly was turned around to look where the first shot came from. Full metal jacket. The third shot Oswald had a couple seconds to line up and blew the side of Kennedy's head off. He had just enough time to get 3 shots off and just got lucky. He was focused and wanted to be famous for killing a president. Research the people who knew him best. Even his brother thought he did it alone.
@@raynic1173 that's technically true. Lead is diamagnetic, meaning that it is repelled by magnetic fields that would attract magnets. Lead is a very heavy metal and not very conductive, only 7% as conductive as silver. But lead will interact *slightly* to very strong magnetic fields, meaning that Magneto could have curved it. Lead's weight and poor conductivity (not the fact that it isn't magnetic) is probably what kept Magneto from saving jfk.
I've been a hunter for almost 40 years and have always thought that if Oswald did it alone, then it wasn't with the bullet in evidence. It is truly absurd to claim that bullet caused 7, yes 7, gunshot wounds, including a shattered wrist. If Oswald did it alone(which i find extremely difficult to believe for numerous evidence based reasons) then something happened to the original bullet and LE panicked and put this one in evidence to save their careers. Because without a single doubt, it wasn't done with the bullet in evidence. I'll never believe the lone nutters truly think the bullet in evidence is responsible for those 7 wounds either. They continue to back it for patriotic reasons more than evidentiary. Sad but true. They are not that stupid. They know.
.....for patriotic reasons?...what on earth could you mean? ...a President was killed... The Best president we have ever had, & probably ever will have.... so How...can anyone call a Coverup of his Murder.....for patriotic reasons?
I agree....I tend to believe a shot came from the grassy knoll area....many eyewitness said so....and the railroad workers who were up on the bridge and saw smoke or dust coming from that area
My dad has this story of my grandpa who was a sniper in the marines trying recreate those shots and couldn’t. I would assume that him and Oswald would have had similar training. But it was just a story that my dad didn’t even know if it was true because his brother told him about it.
When Lee Harvey Oswald was in the Marine Corps he was basically the worst shot..His scorecard was written in pencil it was erased and changed to make him look like a better shot.. Malcolm "Mac" Wallace ex-marine he was Lyndon Johnson's Hitman this guy killed eight people and got away with it all he even killed Lyndon Johnson sister "Josefa" in 1963 they already had the evidence his fingerprints on the boxes and the tape and on the spent shells on the floor..There was 2 guy's also on the grassy knoll that was the head shot or the killshot.."Hermino Diaz" shot Kennedy in the temple the other guy beside him shooting was James Files Ex-CIA.. Lee Harvey Oswald was just the Patsy.. George Bush Senior had oil fields in Cuba he would go over there on his own ship called the Barbara after his wife..In return he would give them thousands of automatic machine guns handguns and ammunition for loading up his ship with 55-gallon Drums of crude oil..There was more then 4 shooters Kennedy never had a chance..The guy's that paid to have him killed were Rich oilmen tycoons from Texas..They put out $2 Million dollars..
Does that mean that it is impossible that when a bullet hits your nervous system in the brain, that you twitch baaack and to the left because of a muscle spasm? Really? That is not a possibility? Why did his right arm rise as well? And how is it possible that a bullet causes the movement in such a fashion? This ain't no Hollywood movie where people go flying after they got hit. Bullets penetrate, they don't force movements. There are many tests that show that JFK's movement does not come from the bullet. The initial movement(one frame) is actually slightly forwards before going back and to the left. It is a spasm. Also, there is blood spray that indicates a bullet from the rear(Exit wounds are larger than entry wounds causing that spray). If the shot came from the front, where did that bullet(or fragments) go after the hit? They only found fragments of a bullet in FRONT of JFK. Conclusion: the shot came from behind. No grassy knoll shooter.
@Alfonso G Where did Joe say or claim that he knew more about guns than Oliver Stone did? Having been in the infantry,Stone obviously HAD to know about guns and how to properly use them, given his background in the military and war (otherwise,he wouldn't have survived)but one doesn't cancel out the other. Joe knows about guns because of his background in hunting and Stone knows about them,too. There are people who were hunters or even who have criminal backgrounds,who know a lot about guns.You don't have to have been in the military and law enforcement or a government agency or the military,ALONE,to know a lot about guns,
@murray1234567891011 I can do the same thing for Joe's "if Werner von Braun was alive today, the Simon wesenthal center said he would be punished for crimes against humanity" speech
@@Rayburn58 He wanted to disband the CIA. The CIA has been involved in assassinations and failed assassinations for years. Chavez? If they were going to do Northwoods and basically martyr innocent people for the war machine then they absolutely would assassinate a sitting president who got in their way.
@@Rayburn58 Since you want people to spoon feed you publicly available knowledge. The national security archive (nsarchive2.gwu.edu) has the declassified operation northwoods from 1962. Along with other reputable sites. (Not Wikipedia) Instead of just saying “absurd” or thinking everything is a conspiracy theory you should actually attempt to fact check PRIOR to claiming something is false. Operation mongoose like the person above me brought up. Lots of information about that as well. Check the National archives. It’s a gov website. The New York Times article from April 25 1966 talks about Kennedy being “disturbed” by the CIA for being misled on the bay of pigs and has an admin quote reporting he vowed to “splinter the C.I.A. Into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds”. Cause just like today’s White House staff and attorneys. Everyone likes to write books about private conversations and leak to the press. Bay of pigs was a disaster to him. Kennedy’s speeches are also available to listen to if you want. He wanted to end the nuclear arms race. That’s Not exactly in the best interest of arms dealers and companies who profit in war. As for the coup claim.... I’m really not sure how old you are, or where your from but paying closer attention in US government or American History classes would have done you well. Even just watching the news. Election meddling? By the US in foreign countries, Lol you think Russia made that one up....? Venezuela? Guatemala? National archives, cia.gov, library of congress. You have all of these sources at your finger tips.
I went to an Oliver Stone talk/interview in SF circa 2009. At the end they took audience questions, and I asked whether he thought 9/11 was an inside job. To my surprise, he said he didn't think it was.
Im not sure how much I believe the CIA was involved but at the very least they were complicit and knowing it was going to happen and didn't stop it. Personally I believe they were more involved but it's all speculation. I agree Oliver Stone seems like he would think it was an inside job but maybe he didn't want to say something and sabotage his career. The Kennedy assassination is safer because of the time that passed
@@uncletony6210 sheesh. Well, oliver stone can't be that dumb. He is likely very smart. And if he believes the official usa government story about wtc, then he is likely a liar. Cause I do not think he is stupid. Obviously controlled demolition. He knows it. He must. It's also why I don't buy his jfk film, he knows the culprits, and one of his producers arnon milchan likely knows too.
Joseph when you shoot someone from the back you fall forwards and if shot from the front you fall backwards. Has anyone in America watched the Zapruder film !
Keep in mind that no one, ever, at any point in time has ever been able to pull off the shooting that LHO was claimed to have done. For Joe to say its possible is a stupid argument. They've been trying to replicate what they say LHO did for 60 years with the best trained sharpshooters to ever come along. Not a single person on earth could replicate it. LHO could not have pulled that off. Period.
Hunters and shooters who train a lot know what bullets do. You see what happens when the slug hits the target and spins off. Or when the slug hits the ground. You don’t have to be a ballistics expert to know what happens to the slug. I shoot 2,3 times a month and I regularly see what happens to slugs on the range.
"They killed the President" is right. In one of MANY elements to consider, there were 13 or 14 cars in that motorcade. In EVERY motorcade/parade in history, the primary dignitary rides in the middle car as the parade builds to the honored person, and then recedes to the final car. The fact that President Kennedy, the primary dignitary, rode in the lead car, and not the middle car, never happened before and has not happened since. Being in the "lead car," in my view, was not an accident. There is a rare photo (difficult to locate now) photo that shows a decal with the number 7 pasted on the driver's side front window of President Kennedy's vehicle. He was supposed to be in the middle car of that motorcade, and not in the lead.
OK, so what? Because he was the primary dignitary AND the President AND the Commander in Chief, AND the most powerful man in the world, I would expect him and Jackie to be in the LEAD car. It's not like a Santa Claus parade.
@@charleszartman8928 OK, so what of it? Whether JFK was in the 1st car or the 10th, would that have stopped a sniper's bullet from the 6th floor? I don't know what was decided when the President's plane touched down at the Dallas airport, after arriving from Fort Worth around noon. Kennedy had a luncheon at the Dallas Trade Mart (at 1pm?) and I suspect he and the driver wanted to control the pace of the motorcade, cut it short if need be, and get there in plenty of time. I believe he was running a bit late.
@@yermom014 Has it? Are you talking the USA or other countries? How many USA Presidential motorcades have their been since Nov 22/63 like the one with JFK? I don't have an answer to that. Have there been any? Reagan in 1981? The President's limo - I'm assuming - is bullet proof, steel reinforced, etc., with tinted windows. No President since then rides in an open convertible to my understanding. I could be wrong, however. As far as not riding in the LEAD car, I suspect having 1 or 2 or 3, etc., cars ahead of the Presidential limo could act as barriers, if you will, security in the event someone were to attack the President's motorcade from the front. But that's just my speculation.
As a Registered Nurse 20 years ago I worked in Trauma at Tampa General. The chief of the Trauma Team trained at Parkland Hospital in Dallas under one of the physicians who laid hands on JFK in the Parkland ER November 1963. JFK was shot from the front NOT from behind. CIA, Mafia, FBI and the Marseille Drug Cartel supplied assassins orchestrated the event. A former federal agent with whom I also saw as a patient in the ICU at another hospital where I worked interviewed a primary member of the Marseille team of shooters but on another issue as he found out later... coming that close to history. This man met with H.W. Bush in the Oval Office during his presidency as an advisor to the president. I encourage Oliver Stone to review the CNN 50th Anniversary special on the JFK Assassination. Video does not lie. Shot from the front NOT from behind! There is more... But this does tell the tale. Cannot wait for this documentary... IF WE are permitted to view it... CENSORSHIP...
Prove that fact. Right now. To the entire world. With evidence. Evidence that a court of law or even public opinion would support. If you could you would be rich or dead. That's why no one else in 60 years has done so. This is not FACT. This is SPECULATION.@@robertzacharias6815
Any comment from a Parkland doctor regarding a "front shot" always uses the phrase "appeared to be". They didnt know for sure, because that wasnt their job at the moment. No one at Parkland was conducting a forensic investigation. They were conducting live saving procedures and could not make a definitive determination in that moment. Turns out, (based on additional information (Kennedy's and Connally's back wounds) that they were WRONG.
No Joe, that shot is virtually impossible. The best Marine Corps sniper in history tried it 10 different times, using the same junk model of bolt action rifle, same window, same angle and conditions as close as they could get on that day, and in 10 out of 10 tries, he couldn't make those shots in the amount of time Oswald supposedly did or at the angle he was at. Case closed, Joe
Got that from the movie JFK I'm guessing? I've seen documentaries showing people doing it quite easily in the allotted time. Oswald was in the Marines, it's not like he was a novice. Fact is someone did it, because Kennedy got shot from that window of the book depository. I don't understand how Stone can keep saying that Kennedy had a hole in the back of his head you can clearly see in the Zupruder film the front right of his head blasts out that means the bullet came from behind that was the stupidest part of JFK where they kept showing it over and over again and the exit wound was clearly on the front of his head and they were saying the shot came from the front that doesn't make any sense
@@jameslindsay9272 No, I've never seen that movie, so I've not gotten anything from it. Your opinion is your opinion, and mine is mine. Curtis Hathcock was the sniper that tried the shot 10 times, so I guess your guys were much better than he was.
@@JokersWild70 How is it an opinion if you have proof they couldn't make the shot? That sounds like a fact. I just watched the Oliver Stone doc from last year, now I don't know what to believe. I don't think we'll ever know the true story, but it being a conspiracy is definitely a possibility.
@@jameslindsay9272 By opinion, I'm saying that JFK's head wound DID NOT come from the depository. A shot from a rifle to the back of the head doesn't cause a person's head to first violently whip backwards. It would cause it to go forward. I don't like arguing semantics with people, and it sounds like you're pretty confident in your opinion.
@@JokersWild70 you don't know what the round would do, how many people have you shot in the head to compare? I've never seen another person shot in the head in real life, so I can't say what would happen
The look on his face says (to me) "I've been played like a fiddle." That means nothing, granted. But, he's in custody for 48 hrs and there is no record of an interrogation? C'mon! Look up Thomas Vallee, who would have been the "Oswald of Chicago" if the hit had taken place there. It might've taken place in Miami if the SS hadn't caught wind of it and killed the motorcade portion of that visit.
Joe says the part about “I know some great marksmen, and that shot could have been done”. One note about that, all the marksmen that Joe would know became masters of that during a time with vastly improved military technology and training as it relates to what existed in 1963. Were there people putting up Chris Kyle numbers in ‘63? No.
There was a line in the original “JFK movie “. That always stuck out to me . “ Who were the Winners “ in the JFK assassin !?? . Who had the most to gain ? I think we all know now .
I went to the school back depository and looked out where Oswald shot JFK. I was shocked to see it wasn't that far a shot. It looks farther away in photos. That's my only comment. First time listening to you Joe and you do a great job. Congratulations on your success. I was at the Comedy Store a few years before you were there. Good luck.
Correct. Also the Lincoln Kennedy was in was modified with an elevated back seat for him to be better seen by the crowd. At this angle the trajectory of the bullet makes perfect sense and Oswald could and in all likelihood did kill the President on his own.
@@cormacthem8406 I don't know about that... I think there was a shot from the grassy knoll.....I think there was probably 2 shooters...Maybe Oswald...maybe not...but at least 2 shooters
@@User39.there’s still be a tendency that gun shots has some sort reverberation that can cause to echo the same shot from distances often happens in hunting too
i feel like joe is really understating how hard those shots wouldve been lmao 😂😂 why is he so pressed about it? three shots in like three seconds adjusting for range for each shot on a bolt action rifle while the target is in a moving car??? come on joseph rogan
The shots aren’t hard IF you know the aim off at each distance. If Oswald used the scope, he would have to have held the crosshairs off the intended point of impact in both the vertical and horizontal axes (because of the unusual scope mount). If he used the iron sights, we know those were fixed at 200m. To hit at 81m (the head shot) the aim off would have been 12” low plus another 2” lower for the descending angle of the shot. Oswald was never trained to make those kind of adjustments. There’s no way he knew how to make those shots.
I remember seeing JFK with my father and going into the cinema a boy and coming out a man. It really did feel like that on the way out, that my eyes had been opened to the world that I live in.
@Bryan Mack Yes. I've always found it troubling that for millions of Americans, the Kennedy assassination was a formative political experience, based on the belief that Oswald didn't act alone.
The shots were incredibly difficult for anyone. Do not forget that if Oswald did act alone not only did he pull off really good shots but he did so under the stress of him killing the President of the United States (even for a "professional " that has to make you nervous), plus the possible detection at any moment by doing it behind some boxes at an office building. I have no idea who may have been involved besides Oswald I just find it hard to believe he pulled off that level of marksmanship under those circumstances.
I feel like he had assistance from someone, somewhere definitely.. but wasn't he in the marines or navy or something like that as well? Maybe that's how he landed the shot as well..
Remember, Oswald missed his first shot, and he built a snipers perch for better shooting stability, and he was shooting at a Slow moving vehicle traveling in a straight line. Not that difficult when you know the Facts.
@@jimtruscott5670 Everytime these conspiracy people try to push Oswald and all the evidence against him out the back door, Oswald always comes right back around to the front door. No one else ever shows up at the front door with evidence for the conspiracy theorist. Ever.
The most painful thing is watching Oliver Stone being interviewed because everyone tries multiple times to subtly and overtly ask Oliver a tough question that prompts him to throw himself under the bus and undermine his own credibility. Even after all these years people still get paid to try to trip this guy up.
I wish that pad on Joe’s head was centered
WA it’s back, and to the left
Damn you.
Looks like one of the guys on men on film... three finger snap.
OCD much?
I'm so OCD I have to look away in disgust
I'm glad to see somebody is keeping JFK's murder in the public domain. We owe it to our children to keep this story alive.
Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team:
czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html
A related list:
czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html
What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
I think we’ve given out children enough nonsense to worry about. How about we teach them to do their taxes instead
I believe George Bush Sr. and Henry Kissinger was in involved. We will never know the truth until that evil bastard is gone.
@@bradcrane4706 I learned the hard way when I was young making almost $6k -8k month with commission and majority time I was claiming exempt and getting my fat bonuses. I remember before I claimed exempt I would let them tax me it was 30% of my pay check so if I made $5k they take out $1500 like wtf but I claimed exempt I got all my money but I got fucked at the end I paid over $10l in taxes
@@oliverrodriguez8541 that’s a long paragraph man right on
You know they are telling the truth when CZcams has to put the “fact check” on the video
From Wikipedia, nonetheless.
I don’t have that sign haha
Citing Wikipedia is like saying, “We fact checked this story with our crazy neighbor down the street who said this is bullshtt”.
It's not Wikipedia, you guys, it's Britannica
@@octavianbalenciaga6799 , even so. I was an FBI agent assigned to the Dallas office in the 80’s and I would estimate that more than half of the agents assigned there at the time thought the Warren Report was BS. I used to drive home on JFK’s assassination route on Elm St. every day, right past the grassy knoll. It was hard not to think about it every once in a while.
Carlos “Gunny” Hathcock, sniper (USMC), the Marine Corps’ premier sniper with 93 confirmed kills including history’s longest single kill-shot of 2,500 meters, nominated for the Congressional Medal of Honor for action in Vietnam, former chief instructor of the USMC Sniper’s School, at Quantico, Virginia. (Note: Gunny Hathcock proved the impossibility of the lone-nutter scenario during tests he personally conducted at Quantico, Hathcock's own words...
"Let me tell you what we did at Quantico. We reconstructed the whole thing: the angle, the range, the moving target, the time limit, the obstacles, everything. I don't know how many times we tried it, but we couldn't duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did".
Oswald literally missed a general sitting by a window at his desk and we are lead to believe he hit a moving target from a sixth floor window three times? NO WAY. Doesn't jive. This isn't talked about enough. The Carcano rifle is a giant POS, too.
Hathcock's shot was not the longest kill shot and it was from 2500 yards not 2500 meters. Oswald's shot to JFK's head was only 88 yards.
I’ve been to Dallas. Within seconds you can tell the angles are wrong.
@@bunkshaner22 There is no place to hide for a grassy knoll shooter. No credible witness saw a gunman behind the stockade fence.
@@bunkshaner22 Marilyn czcams.com/video/ZhfTc5sFw9s/video.html
Even out here in Australia, both my Dad and Grandad said JFK's assassination sent a shiver down their spines, not just because of the shocking public murder, but also because as outsiders looking in, it was clear to them this was a highly orchestrated event, they never believed Oswald getting off all of those "perfect" shots. Grandad led heavy machine gun battalion in WW2 in Middle East, and Dad served reconnaissance in Vietnam, so I naturally listened when they spoke on these matters.
Everyone (Oz, EU, Canada) thinks it was a coup d'etat, except for the here in the US, where the MSM and govt' keep feeding us the same line of propaganda, coverup, and lies they fed us in '63!
Show both them this, this is the missing part they never seen. Type this guys name in and it still doesn't come up.
czcams.com/video/58xhXSAZJog/video.html
And yet the same forces are getting your country to fight China in the future. As long as the war isn't on US soil. These guys in the US government will always push for more war. They don't care about nukes. They are willing to play crazy games to win if they killed the president, got away with it and stayed in power. They have never got any consequence from their actions.
Yeah, so there are idiots in Australia too. Why wouldn't a sharpshooter be able to get of those shots, when it has been replicated numerous times?
@@philsurtees you can disagree without being a prick
I feel like Oliver Stone has had this conversation every day for 29 years and just isn't feeling it anymore
Well he certainly isn't feeling Joe Rogan's claim as to what a good shot is. Unfortunately Joe you don't have clout just because you're "a hunter". I think Mr. Stone did a good job of deflecting at a time when Joe was most passionate.
😂😂😂faaaak......
@@tomallen5837 wasn't Oliver in Nam?
@@broganlund1268 yup
@@tomallen5837 Rogan's version of hunting is going with a guide, and he uses top notch gear. Hard to take him serious with some things.
I was an FBI agent, assigned to the Dallas office is the 80’s, (Bobby Gillam ” was the SAC, for my bona fides), and most of the agents didn’t even think Oswald acted alone.
Lee did act alone, innocent men are not silenced for knowing nothing. Lee fired two bullets, the first missed and the second went straight through JFK and Connely who was sitting inboard and lower than the President on a jumpseat. The third round was a Remington .223 frag round which exploded Kennedy's skull, instantly killing the 35th President of the United States. Oswald had a birds eye view from the sixth floor corner window, witnessed the origin of the third bullet. Lee had to be silenced.
On the book depository, theres a plaque on the building and they even reference the conspiracy to it. Wild!
Based on my research, it is unlikely Oswald acted at all.
Very Best Regards,
Tom Scott
Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System
_Our American Injustice System_
_Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
did he even fired a rifle
@@erniecortes5453 No sir.
Oswald passed the nitrate test on his face neck..no way he fired 3 shots with a bolt action and came out clean like that.
Great to have Oliver Stone on the podcast and Joe does 70% of the talking.
What’s the podcast name?
I really cannot stand Joe, he just has amazing guests and great topics so I only care to listen to his guests so this is frustrating to me as well when he opens his mouth at all.
Came here to find this comment 😂 what’s the point in having special guests if you’re gonna talk over them😅
@@jpete3027666I’m in the same boat. Though I will say not every guest is a winner but when he brings a good one on he talks over them for 80% of the episode.
@@flipper1559 yep!
The book that pulls it all together is "JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why it Matters". Incredibly well-researched.
CA mafia, cuba, CIA were all involved, Read the book Plausible Denial by Mark Lane, he won a court case by proving Howard Hunt managed the hit. Lane also had been head of House Committee of Assassinations
That book contains a very telling, off-hand comment made by Allen Dulles (to a writer who was helping him), spoken with contempt: "That little Kennedy---he thought he was a god."
@Anakin - Seating arrangement (boosted seat) doesn't explain a nearly pristine bullet suddenly appearing on the gurney. And nice try with the old "mentally ill conspiracy retards" name-calling routine, but that trick doesn't work any more.
@Anakin You left out Bigfoot.
Anakin lol that’s an interesting take...personally I can understand your point if someone is overly engrossed in conspiracy theories constantly, that will drive people mad....but this was a major situation, so if people want to dig into researching and discussing it, why do you care? You realize humans are social creatures? We like to communicate about big and small issues...and you’re on the same thread lol
JFK single handedly prevented nuclear war. He was a hero on the battlefield and in the Oval office. He was a great great man. He did NOT deserve to die like that.
RIP Mr President
Singlehandedly??? Um ... no!
@@philsurtees he's the president. His call, so......yeah
So true. Well said.
Not single-handedly. That is an extremely childish way to look at it. He had a team that understood and fought for him and gave him the solutions to eventually go that route. He wavered back and forth many times. His leadership was huge, but single-handedly? No.
@@mulderscully2054 who's the president? Who makes the call? Yes. Single-handedly
Joe saying he can judge a person's character based on their reactions to conspiracy theories (in this case JFK's murder) is something I never thought of, but absolutely seems telling to me. It reveals someone's nature in response to something that isn't cut and dry. Not even so much the response, but rather the reasoning that brought them to their thoughts will apply to other situations. Almost want to call it a litmus test, except not so binary with a large grey area.
A similar one for me is the question of whether a person thinks that Shakespeare (the villager from Stratford) wrote those plays.
@@darylfernandez2153 but shakespeare actually did write those plays doofus
@@theoneandonly7019 You're dumb. Go investigate.
So Joe and Oliver wear the same-size foil hat.
@@darylfernandez2153eah, i saw that rabbit hole. Its not very believable in my eyes that he was a persona for a ghost writer. His name existed back then in the right areas. Also, dont call people dumb for disagreeing with you. Thats asinine, even if he insulted you first.
60 years and they still won’t release it all. WTF? Thank you Oliver tor keeping this alive.
Rumor has it that’s because Bush Sr. was named in some contexts as one of the “architects”. I’m probably spreading disinformation but, Bush’s CIA did it!
EXCELLENT!! We’re back to, “it’s Bush’s fault.”
December 24, 2022
They just released some more, under the Freedom of Information Act.
It's still not all of it, apparently.
The fact that they keep refusing to release everything says a lot. Somebody has something to hide. They are probably stalling until everyone involved is dead.
I don’t know what I am going to do when Joe goes to Spotify and I can’t read the comments on the vids 🤷🏼♂️
I thought he already started on there
JRE clips will still be here
surely spotify video platform will have comment section. if theres no comm section and voting, it will fail anyway
Joe if youre reading this its too late..
I hope it fails. It would be fun to see it fail. Joe's about out of podcasting steam anyway. He's cashing in, then getting out.
How is Joe thinking he knows more about this than Oliver Stone
Oliver Stone swallowed Jim Garrison's bullshit, so he doesn't know that much.
@@lucasoheyze4597 The small hat's and American Zionists killed Kennedy.
Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team:
czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html
A related list:
czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html
What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
@@lucasoheyze4597
You're a damn fool if you think Garrison was bullshitting and dont beleive that main stream depiction of the trial rom back in the day, Garrison sued them amd won over that
@@lucasoheyze4597 you choked on j Edgar Hoover's bullshit . Lol
While I appreciate JR keeping this discussion in the public domain here, watching him talk to Stone about the JFK assassination is a bit amusing. He seems like a student in class talking to a veteran teacher about something the guy's taught hundreds of times. Stone is game but it's easy to see he's being a bit polite as JR talks about guns.
Except Oliver got many details wrong in his movie including the supposed magic bullet.
couldn’t disagree more, nothing hes done has proven accurate
@rchuckins. Problem is Stone’s assassination film proved he knew and understood almost nothing about the assassination. It was a farce.
Like what? The Magic Bullet conspiracy theory has already been debunked. Even the federal government changed its official position from the lone gunman conspiracy theory to a theory that there was probably a conspiracy to assassinate.@@TruthDissident
The time between the second and third shot could not have been done with a bolt action rifle.
4.9 seconds for the time between 2nd and 3rd shot? Based on Zapruder of course. What's so hard to beleive about that? The Brits used to train for a 'mad minute' of accurate fire from a bolt action service rifle, over 100 years ago. A rate of fire (also hitting the target of course) with an average of less than two seconds between shots was not out of the question. 300 yard range. Tests were done at the time after the assasination using a similar rifle as Oswald's and the results showed it could be done, many of the shooters taking less than 6 seconds total to fire three rounds. Jamming was encoutnered by the tests but that doesn;t mean Oswald's rifle jammed. Could _Oswald_ have done it? Open for a lot of debate. He wasn't a world-calss marksman. But could he do it fast? Sure why not. Yes, Hathcock said it couldn't be done. He meant couldn't be done while hitting the target, demonstrably and as a matter of record that rate of fire can be had with a bolt action. You can see the videos on youtube lol. But what if what Oswald hit didn't matter? An lot has been said about his terrible first shot. Well. A first shot miss actually isn't uncommon among target shooters who make the mistake of taking the first shot with a nice clean bore. You actually want the barrel slightly fouled. But what if Oswald and his crappy Carcano did what you'd expect and miss his target every time? Then the question about rate of fire becomes easy: yes he could fire it that fast. Since it is, I hope, your opinion that Oswald certainly did not act alone, this supports the idea that the fatal shots came from someplace else. Where did Oswald's bullets go? Can't say. But it's easy for me to accept he missed.
@@bbb462cid 3 reports. 1- pause and then 2-3 on top of each other. Amost simultaneously. That Carcano rifle has a long bolt throw making that sequence of fire impossible. Don't be a schill.
@@bgarrison67 LOL, a 'shill' burn 30 seconds, and read my whole comment numbnuts.
There was a documentary back in early 90s or late 80s were they cover all the questionable facts they had a skilled rifleman not snipper perform the three shots hit all three with a 1/2 second to spare I believe he used the same rifle
@@allanroche8053 Shots 2 and 3 are almost on top of each other, nobody can recycle a bolt, reprop and aim accurately that quickly.
Joe debating the JFK assassination with Oliver Stone is like trying to tell a baker about bread.
Interesting baking!
Yeah, but he actually did try and debate stone.
Not true when it's Stone who took liberties with "truths" and inserts them into the movie. Trouble is, people are then on the hook to research and find out what was true and what took liberties and is misinformation in the movie.
@@justincase4812 stone pretty much nailed it. The official version was never accepted. Stone just took the conclusion the majority of people felt . He made a great movie that pissed off the establishment .
Well said Sir...lol. Thinking the same thing...smh.
Is it just me or does Oliver have a calming voice
Soothing
Cute cat
Very much.
Very. His voice is even more calming than Noam Chomsky's.
Not just that, it's hypnotizing, I could listen to him talk about life all day.
The fact that oliver stone is a nam vet has always helped me hold truth to some of the things hes said and done...great film maker/historian
The guy loves Castro and every other communist dictator- for a fact- he supporters every anti- US government
Yeah no soldier could ever be wrong or crazy
So Nam Vets can NOT be completely delusional? Wow, learn something new every day
If anything, fighting in a war that was somewhat and became more unpopular as it went along doesn’t really help that case. Especially once documents showing the government had been selling the people an overly Rodney picture and they were privately doubtful they they could win in Vietnam, as they were fighting it.
Being disillusioned and cynical, or at least having good reason to doubtful of government use of military power doesn’t mean it doesn’t too far.
If someone has decided, or has the genuine feeling that it’s all a lie(the war) then everything else is easy to cast doubt on… even when the telling of the JFK story goes beyond critical of government and into being driven by things other than fact….
A big question that never gets asked is why Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald. Everybody writes it off as him being emotionally driven because he loved Kennedy, but let's be real, Lee Harvey Oswald being able to talk about what happened would have blown everyone involved out of the water.
Yea you mean jack Rubinstein. Read Michael Collins pipper on his take of the perpetrator of assassination
It’s because they controlled the information that was released. The CIA is the shadow government.
So you dismiss the comments of those around him very often if what type of person he was simply by saying “buts be real”.
The people who knew ruby were being real. Ruby hung around that police station often, they knew him. He was a highly emotional man. He was seen crying in public and made many emotional phone calls after the assassination.
“Let’s be real” should mean go where the evidence leads, not let’s make a good story
Allen Dulles was on fire as the head of the CIA along with his brother, John Foster, who was Secretary of State at the SAME time. Both dudes began their careers as corporate lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell and continued protecting those clients’ international interests throughout their time in government. 1953 on behalf of United Fruit Company and 1954 in Iran on behalf of what is now know as BP. Both democratically elected leaders of those countries wanted to nationalize the natural resources of those countries to benefit their citizens. The CIA protected corporate interests instead. These are only 2 of many examples. When they tried to do the same thing in Cuba JFK refused to call in the military to support the fledgling coup. It was the first failure on the part of the CIA and a major blow to Dulles’ reputation. JFK fired Dulles which in hindsight was not a very smart move considering the dude had spent the past decade developing the skill and network to assassinate political opponents and overthrow governments. Obviously there’s quite a bit more to the story but this is a good starting point for anyone wanting to understand where we are today politically and how we got here.
I don't agree, the air cover aspect of The Bay of Pigs invasion was a blunder. Kennedy ok'd the Bay of Pigs, as long as there was plausible denial(of the mission). It failed! Hence the 'fire-ing' of Allen Dulles. Everything above that is correct. Before making the "BAD CAPITOLIST" case. Think about what kind of danger Communist-Cuba posed. Missle Crisis?
Good book about this called 'Devil's Chessboard'.
Insightful. Never knew that
Nationalizing industry never benefits private citizens, it only increases the size and power of the state.
There is also the small matter of JFK wanting to: inspect the Dimona reactor in Israel, supporting Algerian independence, registering AIPAC under FARA, giving Palestinians the right of return and get closer to Gamal Nasser in Egypt. All of this changed AFTER he was murdered.
I love how Stone literally just finished a documentary on the JFK assassination yet Joe still corrects him. Settle down bro.
@Irving Ceron He's not but he's done considerably more research than Joe and has a substantially more qualified opinion on the subject. However, Joe's skepticism is one of his best traits.
John Hammersmith but Joe forgot more about shooting and guns while taking his last dump than liberal Stone will ever know.
Mark S decorated combat veteran, liberal Stone?😏
Mark S joe acts like he’s been hunting his whole life. He’s only been doing it these last few years. Phony wannabe joe
Because the dude has done jack shit for research
"No marksman in the world could've made that shot"
czcams.com/video/ghmY6HmR4fs/video.html
With ONE search. Two guys hit 2/3 shots, and one hit 3/3 perfectly.
Kennedy loved Cuba. I wish we had a president like him now. He was a TRUE democrat and I'm a republican
lol
Huh?
"The bullet hitting those two people and finding it's way onto the gurney, magically, with very little distortion in the bullet at all, is straight up HORSESHIT"
What is your knowledge of ballistics? your knowledge of ballistics is probably on the same level as joe rogan.
Tash - Six doctors and an FBI weapons expert involved in this case agree with you.
Joe "I've shot guns before" Rogan
Exactly. Rogan with 0 military experience is arguing with Stone...a Vietnam combat vet.
Joe was getting a little worked up on his beliefs. Mr Stone keeping his demeanor calm and not letting his beliefs get infront of him well done Mr. Stone. Joe is a measured guy in most situations but when his beliefs get the best of him his voice gets louder and he gets determined to be right.
bow rogan ...he thinks a cross bow is the same as a sniping rifle lol
@@mpbh6672 You don;'t have to be in the Military to know about guns, ammo, etc.
Joe ,has plenty of experience with weapons!
Be sides that on record he has the most powerful kick ,pound pressure!
Why didn't Joe go this hard when he had the CIA guy on saying it wasn't that big of a mystery?
good catch
Josh my brother, I feel ya man. Check out the two videos I posted above and read the Warren Report regarding the so called "magic bullet." Dopey Joe and Oliver are so misguided and on the fringe of tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist peeps. Peace! See the videos where Joe also believed in BigFoot and questioned the moon landing.
Cause joe is bought... takes no genius too sus
hes a wet wipe, thats why
I caught this too.. I've defended Rogan from other commenters who always says he changes his perspective based on his guest.. Then the CIA agent video came out and I was like.. Damn he does do that crap.
I visited Dealy Plaza in Dallas last weekend, 12-11-23. Something I've always wanted to do since the 1st time I saw the Zapruder film in 1981. I never believed Ozwald pulled that off because I grew up shooting guns and know a little about how an object moves when shot. It's very eerie standing on the concrete platform where Zapruder and his secretary did. After seeing it in person, it's crazy how close Z was to the JFK! Looks way further on film. If you ever visit Dealy Plaza, it's plain to see where the head shot came from.
There is an old interview of witness Lee Bowers and a recent interview with journalist Robert McNeil who was there. Both describe the spacing of the THREE shots EXACTLY the same way. The 2nd and 3rd were almost right on top of each other. There was no way the 2nd and 3rd shots came from the same bolt action rifle and it's pretty unlikely that the 1st and 2nd shots did.
The latest audio analysis shows there was at least one high velocity and one low velocity rifle and probably 3 rifles.
@@nigelliam153 Does it mean that Oswald changed gun between shots?
@@keimo2007 it means there were 2 or 3 teams. Google the audi tapes at on point theres two simultaneous shots.
A Secret Service agent in the following car accidentally fired his M-16 as he was bringing the rifle up in response to the shots from behind, hitting JFK in the head, killing him...a 1 in a million, accidental shot from a Secret Service agent unfamiliar with the then, new M-16.
@@formernavyspook lol
And people think the government wouldn't do 9/11 😂
That's right.
Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead.
@Taylor Lemoine if they can kill a president.. And its an US president. Then what makes you so hard to believe 9/11 was inside job? Or are you just those guys who would believe everything the media tells you?
Or ride out coronavirus for election benefit
Taylor Lemoine they’re still milking oil from 9/11 🤣.
I love Oliver Stone, he's one of the greatest directors ever in my opinion. It's a shame he was blacklisted by hollywood over a bunch of bull.
What happened there?
What did he do? Jerk off on a bald dude's head?
Why was he blackballed?
I think something about a movie he made in Russia? Correct me if wrong, but I do believe Stone spoke some serious truth to power
Stone has never been on the good side of the studio system. Fantastic filmmaker.
Joe PLEEEEZE let your Guest speak!
I didn't really know a lot about Oliver Stone before watching this other than he's a fabulous film director, but Jfc, my guys a national treasure. A real seeker of the truth.
a seeker of the truth? Oliver Stone is a pathological liar
Joe Rogan = a "smart" guy for idiots
joe gets extremely lively when talking about this
I noticed the same. I tend to agree with what he said about ballistics and the absurdity of an undamaged bullet showing up on the gurney.
Joe isn’t going too say shit about anything that will effect his own stuff and stats now is he...
He gets visibly excited every time he talks about the JFK assassination on the podcast. He’s pretty knowledgeable on it and seems passionate whenever he talks about it for sure
It’s just so intriguing
@@bvker-4368 ofc bro ... that happened in your country ... everyone should be excited bcs that further implicate allot of other things ...
Hate how one person killed Oswald before he could say anything....
And then that guy died after going to prison which tied up all the loose ends
Milk Patty he died of cancer years later
Ruby had MK Ultra connections, saw that on another JRE
Imagine how JFK felt.
@@reinforcedpenisstem made him lose his mind
If Oswald acted alone, why would an eye witness with clear vision and nothing to gain state that he heard a gunshot and saw smoke from behind the wooden fence? Why would two officers immediate race up the hill toward the fence?
Why would people run in lots of strange directions? Why would people report hearing the sound coming from many different directions in a large open area with multiple story buildings reflecting the sound amidst panic.
Oswald was in the book depository and shot kennedy
@@totallybored5526 of Oswald tried to shoot jfk when he was “straight” in front of him(as in, if Oswald’s shoulders are parallel to the school book depository and jfk is within thr buildings frame/umbral/outline) then it’s a harder shot. JFK would have been moving faster a-crossed Oswald than when JFK is further away and JFK would be more in profile so would be smaller target
If that makes sense.
Great Joe Rogan interview and show again! Love his enthusiasm and sincere interest in finding the truth :)
One of the greatest injustices ever carried out in this country.
Only after 9/11 👀
The greatest injustice because millions of Americans believe a conspiracy when there is not one shred of hard evidence to support a conspiracy. Oswald acted alone and millions of Americans will never believe it because of frauds like oliver stone that perpetrate lies and ignore all the hard evidence.
All the "hard evidence" provided by the prime suspect in the crime: the government itself. "We investigated ourselves and found that we did nothing wrong." Whoever believes that hard evidence cen exist in this case after the Dallas PD, Secret Service, FBI, CIA and other officials actively destroyed the crime scene with their utter stupidity and incompetence is a bonafide moron.
@@harbingerofsalt Read what you wrote here. It makes no sense, and your ability to communicate your thoughts is terrible. It's totally unclear what you are trying to say. What does the word "cen" mean? What evidence do you have that the FBI, CIA destroyed the crime scene? It was Dallas PD that was at crime scene and it was not destroyed by anyone.
@@Rayburn58 lol you know damn well it was a typo and I meant to say "can". Tell me I make no sense and can't communicate and that's the one example you can come up with. Pathetic
"they've killed my husband"
- Jackie O.
Doe eyed Jackie O ..... 🙄
@@charlotte7568 her eyes were too wide apart ...
If you read her lips, she says, FFS John, your brains match my coat!!
@@innit1407 Bro...
Saw an interview with the governor who was shot in the seat in front of him and he said Jackie said "his brains are in my hands"
The price on anyone's head isn't that much if they're interfering with business as usual... People be so naïve about the business world
I get that it is not impossible, but the popular that a trained soldier was still a poor marksman a couple years earlier, trained relentlessly to get good, used a suboptimal weapon, took the shots at the time when it would be hardest to hit the target from his position, hit some extremely difficult shots, fired the shots very rapidly, the bullets took a very unlikely trajectory, the bullet was not deformed in the least despite breaking through multiple bones and the killer was assassinated before he could be fully interrogated seems less likely than “he didn’t act alone.”
It's also very unlikely that a second shooter went completely undetected and nobody ever talked.
Keep in mind, witnesses were not unanimous in the number of shots that were heard. 3 was the most commonly heard number. Witnesses don't all agree on the placement of the shooter, which makes sense given how hard it is to locate a shooter with echo. However, almost all witnesses point to ONE gunman either at the TSBD or grassy knoll. Virtually nobody heard multiple shooters at multiple locations.
There are only unlikely scenarios that could've happened. Oswald being the lone gunman has a lot of things going against it but none rule it out.
Just watch the Zapruder film that shows Connally was hit seconds later by a different bullet and shows the fatal shot to the head came from the front. Dozens of people and officers ran toward the grassy knoll.
@@DutchMadness77tons of people have talked tho
@@DutchMadness77nobody who saw the men [plurual] in the TSBD 6th-floor window testified they were shooting. But a few did see one man holding what appeared to be a rifle with another man standing next to the 'rifleman' in the window.
The shots were in salvos. Two to three shots in each salvo were fired simultaneously in three volleys. The vast majority of witnesses heard shots coming from the North Grassy Knoll; a few stated they saw a man behind the knoll 'possibly' shooting at the president.
Again, none saw anyone shooting from the TSBD. But some witnesses heard shots from the direction of the TSBD along with the North Grassy Knoll. That said, an independent researcher from England began a series of experiments and interviews to determine where the shots that actually hit JFK and Connelly originated to quantify or dismiss the conspiracy theories. e.g., kneck, back, chest, head, thigh, and what most people forget the front window of the president's car.
His findings are called the South Knoll Gunmen theory. He uses mathematical computations and eye and earwitness testimony to test the available evidence. As well as recorded interviews with a military covert intelligence asset [Tosh Plumlee], who was not only there in Dealey Plaza along with his team that day but was tasked with stopping the assassination by his CIA handler.
The results of the experiments and Plumlee's testimonials are disturbing, and I refused to believe them for a long time. Plumlee has gone on the record, risking his freedom and safety with what he did for the CIA/DIA/State Department. Plumlee has also testified before the US Congress about his actions not only on that day but also his activities during the Iran/Contra Affair. That recorded testimony is still classified under the grounds of National Security more than 35 years later!
Ask yourself this. If the fatal headshot originated from the right side of the limo at an elevated position on a downward trajectory [North Grassy Knoll ], why didn't the round exit through the left side of Kennedy's head or neck? Being a former Combat Medical Specialist and a lifelong shooter, my experience suggests the exit wound should have exited near his left ear, or an exit wound should have been at the back lower left side of his cerebellum. Instead, the exit wound was on the right side of his head, a few centimeters from the midline.
During the announcement that the president received a coup de gras at his right temple near the hairline by the assistant press secretary (pointing to the entrance wound on his head), the angle from the North Grassy Knoll didn't make sense.
To be clear, the researcher does not claim there weren't shooters at the North Grassy Knoll or in the buildings behind JFK; in fact, he states there is more than enough available evidence to prove there were. But he claims through his experiments that the neck wound to JFK and the head wound to JFK came not from any of these sources but from the South Grassy Knoll.
Here are two links I suggest you take a look at.
midnightwriternews.com/the-south-knoll-gunman/
czcams.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/video.html
@@DutchMadness77 ... I'm sure many "witnesses" were "placed".
Joe "I have a buddy for every little possible thing" Rogan
Joe “My Buddy” Rogan
@chuck bass. Yeah, that’s what happens when you’re well like. You have a lot of friends in different places. 👍🏼
@@artothewanderer9517 you're well like?
Joe "I have a buddy who killed Kennedy and he is named Spotify" Rogan
@William Hoover it's just a joke
All those events are as clear to me today as when they happened. Even as a ten year old i knew oswald was just what he said he was a patsy or fall guy.
Imagine if the Zapuder film never happened. We'd think Oswald did it alone.
Oswald did do it alone
Physically, Oswald did it alone. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was a participant of MKULTRA.
OJ did it
its a helluva shot that the three shots were made with spot on accuracy from a man who, while qualifying in boot camp, was barely able to make Sharpshooter ranking in the Marine Corps marksmanship qualification. Sharpshooter is the middle or "second place" shooting rank awarded to Marines in Bootcamp and in the Fleet. It incredibly easy to make unless you have almost no skill in shooting. Oswald might have shot a rifle as a child since that generation probably had to hunt for their food quite a bit. That being said however, there is no indication that Oswald would have had the capability to make such a shot with a rifle of that age.
Thank you Marine. Oswald got Maggie's drawers.
the maracano rifle biggest joke of all was called by the italians the rifle that couldnt shoot strait
@Steve Stevinson he also wasn't trained to hit moving targets.
@Steve Stevinson wow. It's not but you do have to practice. The point behind this is that it is not a skill taught in boot camp. Oswald wasn't a hunter (either recreational or occupational), nor did he practice shooting at any known point to a necessary degree in his life.
So, how does a man, with no significant degree of skill in advanced shooting techniques, hit a moving target, multiple times, including the head?
If you see the site the shot is not far at all
The thing that really weirded me out was that one of the officers in the book depository identified the weapon as a Mauser rifle. He was former sporting goods store owner and knew the model. His partner checked the barrel and indeed confirmed it was a German Mauser rifle. This was in their reporting. Somewhere between that and ‘what really happened’ it became an Italian Manliker Carcano rifle.
It was always a Mannlicher Carcano. It was initially wrongly ID'd as a Mauser. Keep up, will you?
Someone found a Mauser rife on top of the building. This is in Stone's new documentary. No one reported on this after the assassination.
@@tacticalmattfoley Dear God, that story came from demonstrable serial liar Roger Craig, who later changed his account so the roof rifle disappeared from his story and the Mannlicher transforms into a Mauser. Unbelievable that clown was given an ounce of crediblilty.
@@aaronz7056 I'm just repeating what was in Stone's new documentary. I will say this after having seen the "shooter's box" in the Book Depository Building: unless he was literally hanging out of the window, I just don't see how Oswald made that shot from there.
@@tacticalmattfoley He did it and witnesses (Brennan, Couch, etc.) plainly saw the rifle sticking out of the window. Do not trust Stone. He championed himself as a crusader for truth and justice for Kennedy while happily manufacturing a fake story that lets his murderer off the hook, slanders a lot of innocent people (eg, the cops who risked their lives to capture Oswald alive in the theater) as being co-conspirators to murder and treason, and packs more than 80 *demonstrable* lies into the narrative.
Anyone watched the tv series with James Franco? It’s great and well worth a watch 👍🏻
Yes 11/22/63 was a great show,it left me wanting more episodes.
Stephen King said while researching the book that he arrived at the conclusion that Oswalt acted alone, despite previously believing it was a cover-up. I'd like him to speak more on the topic of why his opinion changed and what evidence he looked at.
He is on the newest release for Epsteen flight log. Look it up. Dude is fucked.
@@johnulcer stephen king and franco are both on epsteen flight log. Democrats gonna blackmail.
@@McJerkins Nah, that's a hoax apparently, although I'm sure you'll tell me why it's just the lizard people trying to cover up facts. Pretty sure they are listed in his "black book" which was basically just a rolodex of famous people. Trump is in it too. Epstein was very powerful and wealthy and probably attended many social functions over the years - it's not surprising that he'd trade business cards with celebs. I think the people who were actually on the flight logs (iirc, Kevin Spacey, Clinton, Woody Allen among others) have some explaining to do, but just because a celebrity made it into his rolodex doesn't mean shit.
one of the Doctors that treated JFK at Parkland hospital wrote a book in which he stated that both of the shots that killed JFK came from the front. He also treated Oswald. While treating Oswald he said Lyndon Johnson called him and told him to say that Oswald confessed to killing JFK before he died. The day that JFK was shot Robert Kennedy contacted the CIA and asked them if they did it. Allen Dulles was fired by Kennedy from the CIA. It curious that LBJ would assign him to the Warren commission.
There is a long line of potential arrangers/wanting Kennedy dead within Government circles.
All of the nonsense about Mafia/Castro/Russia/my mother's tortoise was deliberately put out there by the masters of lies; The CIA.
LBJ. Dulles. Le May. Those are the three I suspect were behind it and it would not have been difficult for them to get it done. In fact, it would have been a very easy operation for the CIA.
This is why so many documents relating to JFK murder are still not released.
It would show the world what it already knows; The CIA causes 50%+ of the world's evil shit and should be dismantled.
All true. I think the Dr you're referring to is Dr Charles Crenshaw.
Even more curious that Dulles was at a CIA safehouse known as the Farm when the assassination occurred and when the CIA head of the assassination department flew into Dallas a few weeks before.
Curious that the people orchestrating the cover up allowed him to publish that book, eh?
When you watch the Z-film enough times, you realize that JFK was the target of a triangulated ambush; 3 different directions/shooters laid in such a way so as to NOT be shooting toward each other; similar to an "x,y,z, axis " milling machine. That way, since there is an extremely small "engagement window", once the shooting starts, ALL THREE shooters fire AT THE SAME TIME. Without a doubt JFK was struck 3X. One struck the Lincoln, photographed; one was a miss, and on struck Connally. It was NOT the same one the hit JFK. Connally got his OWN bullet, and it DID NOT hit JFK first. Not enough damage to the bullet to have hit two men at the same time.
The Shooter movie maybe depicts what Oswald went through, maybe he was hired to protect JFK from a suspected shooter and finally he was turned into the suspect and killed before he could talk.
That is my theory and also X files hot on the subject.
Bugliosi claims the bullets that killed JFK were traced to Oswald's rifle. I haven't read Bugliosi's book but I have my doubts. Even so, a crack marksman could have shot Oswald's rifle, then let Oswald take the heat, get silenced by Ruby, and history's none the wiser. If Oswald hadn't shot Tippit, Oswald prob could have beaten any JFK charge, or might not have been charged, for the assorted reasons that many don't think he could have fired the shots and run down to the lunchroom and calmly stood there when the police officer first saw him. A skilled trial lawyer would have shown reasonable doubt in that set of facts.
Even Oliver Stone is like, "Alriiiight, this guy's just a lil bit nutty."
Joe trying to correct Stone on JFK assassination facts is cringey AF.
@@roberttheodorson1770 Super cringey. I was so ready for Joe to stop saying the shot was possible. I felt like Oliver was like, "This guy has no idea what he's talking about"
@@Peppersfirst
I know what Rogan meant, luck happens, or luck can happen. But that doesn't mean it did, and when we look at most other things in the universe we accept probabilistic logic. The weird thing is how the other bullets were solid, but the last kill shot that appeared to come from the front was a fragmenting bullet.
Also, we have to assume that mixed in with all the honest "conspiracy theorists" who honestly want to solve this or add to the thinking on the case, there are undoubtedly agents of whatever entity posting ideas, facts and fake evidence to throw everyone off.
@@justgivemethetruth Oswald was the only killer, people just like to imagine a conspiracy because Kennedy was "important" and shouldn't have been killed by a narcissistic wingnut. The bullet evidence is clear that the "magic bullet" only hit soft tissue and thus the deformation of the bullet was consistent with the end appearance of the bullet. The bullets for the rifle Oswald used varied in quality so that some fragmented and others didn't.
@@robb3176
My opinion differs
When you know the "Whys" he was killed then the "Who" will not lead to a three-name peeson
Chris W three name person. Lee Harvey Oswald
George herbert walker bush 4 names
@Chris W Stone mentions the man that murdered JFK. DULLES. Look no further.
Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team:
czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html
A related list:
czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html
What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
@@digitaldemocracyai-rob
Haha the Director of CIA and a guy on the Warren Commision...what didn't that evil fu*k do?
I met Oliver twice in 1992 when he visited the bank I worked for and he struck me as a very humble honest man!
Psychopaths are like that
Joe got so worked up about the magic bullet theory, even his little "oohh" at 2:35 sounded angry 😂. And then contrast it with how Oliver Stone is speaking.
Imagine how angry he would get if he was proven wrong?which he is
My Girlfriend - " Joes headphones were not centered the entire time. "
Me - " Did you catch they were going to blow a plane up and make up death certificates for fictitious people? "
My Girlfriend (actual answer, while staring at the screen) - " yeah, someone needs to tell him."
Me - " Well dear god honey i hope they do."
LOL!... I think.
Cut that thing loose... You don’t need that type of stupidity in your life
911 was an inside job!
Or be glad you have a gf that watches JR with you.
jokalee thank you captain obvious.
Fun fact: the Warren Commission was filled with lawyers for the Crown Family, Meyer-Lansky Family, General Dynamics etc.
Meyer Lansky? Where did you get that info? Eddie Bravo or Sam Tripoli?
@@ryannayrryan You can literally read the names of the Warren Commission and verify for yourself.
Allen Dulles was on it 😄 of course Meyer Lanky related people were, La Cosa Nostra has massive power. Hope your not trying to go all anti semite, youll never get close to getting down to the bottom of it
Want the real explanation? These guys were proteges of Mae Brussels who was on Jim Garrisons legal team:
czcams.com/video/RTjeU5MGSKs/video.html
A related list:
czcams.com/play/PLgRoK-eyLjokNbuTECBm-MWhOa0fa0yhV.html
What they dont mention in the movie is Gehlen Organization/Vlasov Army White Russians. Oswald lived in Minsk Belarus. Study and cross refference and you'll realize its true.
Who?
________________________
Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the United States(chairman) (1891-1974)
Richard Russell Jr. (D-Georgia), U.S. Senator, (1897-1971)
John Sherman Cooper (R-Kentucky), U.S. Senator (1901-1991)
Hale Boggs (D-Louisiana), U.S. Representative, House Majority Whip (1914-1972)
Gerald Ford (R-Michigan), U.S. Representative (later 38th President of the United States), House Minority Leader (1913-2006)
Allen Dulles, former Director of Central Intelligenceand head of the Central Intelligence Agency (1893-1969)
John J. McCloy, former President of the World Bank (1895-1989)
General counsel
J. Lee Rankin (1907-1996)
Assistant counsel
Francis W. H. Adams (1904-1990)
Joseph A. Ball (1902-2000)
David W. Belin (1928-1999)
William Thaddeus Coleman Jr. (1920-2017)
Melvin A. Eisenberg
Burt W. Griffin
Leon D. Hubert, Jr.
Albert E. Jenner Jr. (1907-1988)
Wesley J. Liebeler (1931-2002)
Norman Redlich (1925-2011)
W. David Slawson
Arlen Specter (1930-2012)
Samuel A. Stern
Howard P. Willens (liaison with the Department of Justice)
Staff
Philip Barson
Edward A. Conroy
John Hart Ely (1938-2003)
Alfred Goldberg
Murray J. Laulicht
Arthur J. Marmor
Richard M. Mosk (1939-2016)
John J. O'Brien (1919-2001)
Stuart R. Pollak (1937-)
Alfredda Scobey
Charles N. Shaffer, Jr.
Lloyd L. Weinreb (1936-)
The press attacked him like crazy over this documentary
What's it called
They are in league with the deep state.
The third shot came from the front. The Zapruder film proved same.
There's only one thing worst than people asleep... people "pretending" to be asleep... 🤦🏻♂️
*worse*
What do you mean by this? is “asleep” supposed to be the opposite of “woke” ... cuz nowadays ppl who claim to be woke seem to be the most in need of a long nap...
yeah i used to do that when my parents came up to check on me when i was a kid and now i feel horrible
0
Speaking of Joe I presume.
Oliver Stone has made some really great films, and JFK was one of them.
Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July and JFK are his best films, in my opinion
@@TheJPSouza Wall Street really good, and prescient for what would happen to this country with the hedge funders and big banks, "greed is good".. could be this country's motto today
Joe i love your podcasts, it's your true calling. Keep doing it.
As seen in the film, Oswald and some of the others involved were connected to the Civil Air Patrol (CAP). Civil Air Patrol was and remains a CIA recruitment front.
The primary co-founder of the Civil Air Patrol was David Byrd. The owner of the Six-Floor Book Depository building was David Byrd.
Joe says hes shot a lot of guns. Ha, how about bolt action. 3 repeated shots in a row on target within 3 sec. with bolt action rifle. Bullshit
yep and a moving target which the road has a 20 degree downhill slope and also that it winds like a snake as well, tell me as a shooter and sniper all those facts need to be calculated the scope was misaligned, its was at least 4" to the left and the same high, now even if you drop that same rifle the scope is not going to move that much, the fbi had to put 3 metal shims under it just to make it accurate to fire and they say that a ln did this shooting with that rifle total and utter bs, you need custom rounds with highly skilled snipers its that simple, Carlos harthcock could not do it even if he tried with that weapon totaly impossible its that simple and the most important fact is that the back wound in jfk had no exit point at all and this is right out of the autopsy report he had minor bruising on the inside of the chest wall no exit point for the bullet which they say hit jfk in the back 5 and 3/4 inch's down and 1" to the right of the midline of his back?
True
@@7071t6 the kick back and operating the bolt after each shot means you have to refocus your eye through the sight. Why pass up an easier shot as the car is coming toward him on Houston st.?
He did try and shoot while the car was right below the window. His first shot hit the top of the traffic light instead and ricocheted down the street hitting the sidewalk, cutting that guys cheek with concrete chip. The second shot plowed through both men as Connolly was turned around to look where the first shot came from. Full metal jacket. The third shot Oswald had a couple seconds to line up and blew the side of Kennedy's head off. He had just enough time to get 3 shots off and just got lucky. He was focused and wanted to be famous for killing a president. Research the people who knew him best. Even his brother thought he did it alone.
@@ericwilliams1031 LOL K.
Haven't watched this yet but I want to remind you that it wasn't Magneto, he was only trying to save jfk which is why the bullet curved!
Word!
Lead is not magnetic.
@@raynic1173 that's technically true. Lead is diamagnetic, meaning that it is repelled by magnetic fields that would attract magnets. Lead is a very heavy metal and not very conductive, only 7% as conductive as silver. But lead will interact *slightly* to very strong magnetic fields, meaning that Magneto could have curved it. Lead's weight and poor conductivity (not the fact that it isn't magnetic) is probably what kept Magneto from saving jfk.
go to this video:
czcams.com/video/VEIYXomRdLY/video.html
to see lead and other nonmagmetic metals interacting with a magnet
It was the Comedian that made the shot and his cigar made the puff of smoke
I've been a hunter for almost 40 years and have always thought that if Oswald did it alone, then it wasn't with the bullet in evidence. It is truly absurd to claim that bullet caused 7, yes 7, gunshot wounds, including a shattered wrist. If Oswald did it alone(which i find extremely difficult to believe for numerous evidence based reasons) then something happened to the original bullet and LE panicked and put this one in evidence to save their careers. Because without a single doubt, it wasn't done with the bullet in evidence. I'll never believe the lone nutters truly think the bullet in evidence is responsible for those 7 wounds either. They continue to back it for patriotic reasons more than evidentiary. Sad but true. They are not that stupid. They know.
.....for patriotic reasons?...what on earth could you mean?
...a President was killed...
The Best president we have ever had, & probably ever will have....
so
How...can anyone call a Coverup of his Murder.....for patriotic reasons?
I agree....I tend to believe a shot came from the grassy knoll area....many eyewitness said so....and the railroad workers who were up on the bridge and saw smoke or dust coming from that area
My dad has this story of my grandpa who was a sniper in the marines trying recreate those shots and couldn’t. I would assume that him and Oswald would have had similar training. But it was just a story that my dad didn’t even know if it was true because his brother told him about it.
That's interesting, thank you.
When Lee Harvey Oswald was in the Marine Corps he was basically the worst shot..His scorecard was written in pencil it was erased and changed to make him look like a better shot.. Malcolm "Mac" Wallace ex-marine he was Lyndon Johnson's Hitman this guy killed eight people and got away with it all he even killed Lyndon Johnson sister "Josefa" in 1963 they already had the evidence his fingerprints on the boxes and the tape and on the spent shells on the floor..There was 2 guy's also on the grassy knoll that was the head shot or the killshot.."Hermino Diaz" shot Kennedy in the temple the other guy beside him shooting was James Files Ex-CIA.. Lee Harvey Oswald was just the Patsy.. George Bush Senior had oil fields in Cuba he would go over there on his own ship called the Barbara after his wife..In return he would give them thousands of automatic machine guns handguns and ammunition for loading up his ship with 55-gallon Drums of crude oil..There was more then 4 shooters Kennedy never had a chance..The guy's that paid to have him killed were Rich oilmen tycoons from Texas..They put out $2 Million dollars..
For close family members that’s a lot of hearsay. However I do appreciate your level of honesty. 👍
"BAAAACK and to the left", Thats all you need to know about JFK conspiracy
Bill Hicks was no dummy,that's for sure.
Keith Hernandez
Ralphie may made a joke about that with weed... so strong it’ll make your head go back and to the left lol
He was in a car moving forward, was wearing a back brace, and was thrown back by the exit wound...not the entry wound
Does that mean that it is impossible that when a bullet hits your nervous system in the brain, that you twitch baaack and to the left because of a muscle spasm?
Really? That is not a possibility?
Why did his right arm rise as well?
And how is it possible that a bullet causes the movement in such a fashion? This ain't no Hollywood movie where people go flying after they got hit. Bullets penetrate, they don't force movements. There are many tests that show that JFK's movement does not come from the bullet.
The initial movement(one frame) is actually slightly forwards before going back and to the left.
It is a spasm.
Also, there is blood spray that indicates a bullet from the rear(Exit wounds are larger than entry wounds causing that spray).
If the shot came from the front, where did that bullet(or fragments) go after the hit? They only found fragments of a bullet in FRONT of JFK.
Conclusion: the shot came from behind.
No grassy knoll shooter.
Joe “I like guns more than you do” Rogan
@Alfonso G Where did Joe say or claim that he knew more about guns than Oliver Stone did? Having been in the infantry,Stone obviously HAD to know about guns and how to properly use them, given his background in the military and war (otherwise,he wouldn't have survived)but one doesn't cancel out the other.
Joe knows about guns because of his background in hunting and Stone knows about them,too. There are people who were hunters or even who have criminal backgrounds,who know a lot about guns.You don't have to have been in the military and law enforcement or a government agency or the military,ALONE,to know a lot about guns,
@Alfonso G some people that served don't know a lot about weapons
Stop the BS dam dude what happened? Dude was trying to rob u and you popped him?
Wasn't Gerald Reginald Ford on the Warren Commission, IN Charge of BALLISTICS.?!
"The Devil's Chessboard." (David Talbot) Makes perfect twisted sense. Kudos to Mr.'s Rogan and Stone.
Joe “ im a hunter “ Rogan
"Nothing better then hunting for your own food" Rogan
🤣🤣🤣
omg does this get old...
Me and Oliver did so much coke in the 80s
Bruh
Give us the juicy details
@@hunterscott5836 a lot of laughs, tears and hookers
Why’d you stop? Party’s still going on in 12D!
@@Gynecologist good one, opie
Every time we cant explain something in totality...it automatically becomes a "conspiracy"
I love trust and believe Oliver Stone, most people go with the flow, it takes a truck load of balls to expose the truth...!!!!
in before joe says "magic bullet theory"
@Ba Doai that link is spam
@murray1234567891011 I can do the same thing for Joe's "if Werner von Braun was alive today, the Simon wesenthal center said he would be punished for crimes against humanity" speech
"We must convince the public that (Lee Harvey) Oswald was the real assassin." - One of J. Edgar Hoover's memos after JFK's death.
Oh ffs lol
What hoover was saying is we must convince the public of the truth because oswald did act alone. Not one shred of evidence of any conspiracy.
@@Rayburn58 He wanted to disband the CIA. The CIA has been involved in assassinations and failed assassinations for years. Chavez? If they were going to do Northwoods and basically martyr innocent people for the war machine then they absolutely would assassinate a sitting president who got in their way.
@@darrinnolen1555 What hard evidence do you have to support any of what you said? Show us your proof, instead of voicing an absurd theory.
@@Rayburn58 Since you want people to spoon feed you publicly available knowledge. The national security archive (nsarchive2.gwu.edu) has the declassified operation northwoods from 1962. Along with other reputable sites. (Not Wikipedia)
Instead of just saying “absurd” or thinking everything is a conspiracy theory you should actually attempt to fact check PRIOR to claiming something is false. Operation mongoose like the person above me brought up. Lots of information about that as well. Check the National archives. It’s a gov website. The New York Times article from April 25 1966 talks about Kennedy being “disturbed” by the CIA for being misled on the bay of pigs and has an admin quote reporting he vowed to “splinter the C.I.A. Into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds”. Cause just like today’s White House staff and attorneys. Everyone likes to write books about private conversations and leak to the press. Bay of pigs was a disaster to him. Kennedy’s speeches are also available to listen to if you want. He wanted to end the nuclear arms race. That’s Not exactly in the best interest of arms dealers and companies who profit in war. As for the coup claim.... I’m really not sure how old you are, or where your from but paying closer attention in US government or American History classes would have done you well. Even just watching the news. Election meddling? By the US in foreign countries, Lol you think Russia made that one up....? Venezuela? Guatemala?
National archives, cia.gov, library of congress. You have all of these sources at your finger tips.
JFK, Wall Street, and Platoon are Oliver Stones great contributions to cinema.
One of the few times when Joe should listen to his guest a tad more
If by any chance someone investigated JFK murder and found the hidden answer, I don’t think they would be able to live long enough to tell it.
I went to an Oliver Stone talk/interview in SF circa 2009. At the end they took audience questions, and I asked whether he thought 9/11 was an inside job. To my surprise, he said he didn't think it was.
Im not sure how much I believe the CIA was involved but at the very least they were complicit and knowing it was going to happen and didn't stop it. Personally I believe they were more involved but it's all speculation. I agree Oliver Stone seems like he would think it was an inside job but maybe he didn't want to say something and sabotage his career. The Kennedy assassination is safer because of the time that passed
Perhaps an outside job. As in eeesrael
@@bobbym8974 he apparently thought it was 18 hijackers with box cutters.
@@uncletony6210 sheesh. Well, oliver stone can't be that dumb. He is likely very smart. And if he believes the official usa government story about wtc, then he is likely a liar. Cause I do not think he is stupid. Obviously controlled demolition. He knows it. He must. It's also why I don't buy his jfk film, he knows the culprits, and one of his producers arnon milchan likely knows too.
Sooo it's been 10 months... is this doc of Stone's completed? If so, what is the title so I can look for it?
One shot in the Front
One shot in the Back
One shot to the side of the Head.
Classic ‘Triangulation Kill Zone’ Hit
How right you are.
And one that missed and hit the curb.
if only JFK could have made AIPAC register as a foreign agent
Oliver Stone is one of the best directors and script writers around. Great story teller!
Undeniably!
It's a shame he fell apart with Natural Born Killers. Simply unwatchable junk, horribly miscast.
get real, Stone is trash.
Joseph when you shoot someone from the back you fall forwards and if shot from the front you fall backwards. Has anyone in America watched the Zapruder film !
There is no set rule on which way you fall because a 140 grain bullet hits you. It's not the movies. But the undistorted bullet smells of bullshit.
Keep in mind that no one, ever, at any point in time has ever been able to pull off the shooting that LHO was claimed to have done. For Joe to say its possible is a stupid argument. They've been trying to replicate what they say LHO did for 60 years with the best trained sharpshooters to ever come along. Not a single person on earth could replicate it. LHO could not have pulled that off. Period.
Thank you lol he said “it can be done” by who?
Especially when that shotgun was notorious for being absolute $hit
Joe "I've shot guns so I'm a ballistics expert" Rogan
Lol he’s a gas man, he’s an expert at everything. Good old Joe.
Still a better expert than a kid behind a computer screen ;)
@@Teufelsnachbar667 irrelevant
@@MarvelousMusicmmusic relevant
Hunters and shooters who train a lot know what bullets do. You see what happens when the slug hits the target and spins off. Or when the slug hits the ground. You don’t have to be a ballistics expert to know what happens to the slug. I shoot 2,3 times a month and I regularly see what happens to slugs on the range.
"They killed the President" is right. In one of MANY elements to consider, there were 13 or 14 cars in that motorcade. In EVERY motorcade/parade in history, the primary dignitary rides in the middle car as the parade builds to the honored person, and then recedes to the final car. The fact that President Kennedy, the primary dignitary, rode in the lead car, and not the middle car, never happened before and has not happened since. Being in the "lead car," in my view, was not an accident. There is a rare photo (difficult to locate now) photo that shows a decal with the number 7 pasted on the driver's side front window of President Kennedy's vehicle. He was supposed to be in the middle car of that motorcade, and not in the lead.
OK, so what? Because he was the primary dignitary AND the President AND the Commander in Chief, AND the most powerful man in the world, I would expect him and Jackie to be in the LEAD car. It's not like a Santa Claus parade.
@@jamesanthony5681 So then why has it never been done again?
@@jamesanthony5681 No dignitary in any motorcade is ever in the first car.
@@charleszartman8928 OK, so what of it? Whether JFK was in the 1st car or the 10th, would that have stopped a sniper's bullet from the 6th floor? I don't know what was decided when the President's plane touched down at the Dallas airport, after arriving from Fort Worth around noon. Kennedy had a luncheon at the Dallas Trade Mart (at 1pm?) and I suspect he and the driver wanted to control the pace of the motorcade, cut it short if need be, and get there in plenty of time. I believe he was running a bit late.
@@yermom014 Has it? Are you talking the USA or other countries? How many USA Presidential motorcades have their been since Nov 22/63 like the one with JFK? I don't have an answer to that. Have there been any? Reagan in 1981? The President's limo - I'm assuming - is bullet proof, steel reinforced, etc., with tinted windows. No President since then rides in an open convertible to my understanding. I could be wrong, however.
As far as not riding in the LEAD car, I suspect having 1 or 2 or 3, etc., cars ahead of the Presidential limo could act as barriers, if you will, security in the event someone were to attack the President's motorcade from the front. But that's just my speculation.
As a Registered Nurse 20 years ago I worked in Trauma at Tampa General. The chief of the Trauma Team trained at Parkland Hospital in Dallas under one of the physicians who laid hands on JFK in the Parkland ER November 1963. JFK was shot from the front NOT from behind. CIA, Mafia, FBI and the Marseille Drug Cartel supplied assassins orchestrated the event. A former federal agent with whom I also saw as a patient in the ICU at another hospital where I worked interviewed a primary member of the Marseille team of shooters but on another issue as he found out later... coming that close to history. This man met with H.W. Bush in the Oval Office during his presidency as an advisor to the president. I encourage Oliver Stone to review the CNN 50th Anniversary special on the JFK Assassination. Video does not lie. Shot from the front NOT from behind! There is more... But this does tell the tale. Cannot wait for this documentary... IF WE are permitted to view it... CENSORSHIP...
Exactly! The fact that he was shot from the front says it all
JFK got shot from behind at first, through the throat, it explains why he holds his throat. And then yes the kll shot from the front.
Prove that fact. Right now. To the entire world. With evidence. Evidence that a court of law or even public opinion would support. If you could you would be rich or dead. That's why no one else in 60 years has done so. This is not FACT. This is SPECULATION.@@robertzacharias6815
Any comment from a Parkland doctor regarding a "front shot" always uses the phrase "appeared to be". They didnt know for sure, because that wasnt their job at the moment. No one at Parkland was conducting a forensic investigation. They were conducting live saving procedures and could not make a definitive determination in that moment. Turns out, (based on additional information (Kennedy's and Connally's back wounds) that they were WRONG.
No Joe, that shot is virtually impossible. The best Marine Corps sniper in history tried it 10 different times, using the same junk model of bolt action rifle, same window, same angle and conditions as close as they could get on that day, and in 10 out of 10 tries, he couldn't make those shots in the amount of time Oswald supposedly did or at the angle he was at. Case closed, Joe
Got that from the movie JFK I'm guessing? I've seen documentaries showing people doing it quite easily in the allotted time. Oswald was in the Marines, it's not like he was a novice. Fact is someone did it, because Kennedy got shot from that window of the book depository. I don't understand how Stone can keep saying that Kennedy had a hole in the back of his head you can clearly see in the Zupruder film the front right of his head blasts out that means the bullet came from behind that was the stupidest part of JFK where they kept showing it over and over again and the exit wound was clearly on the front of his head and they were saying the shot came from the front that doesn't make any sense
@@jameslindsay9272 No, I've never seen that movie, so I've not gotten anything from it. Your opinion is your opinion, and mine is mine. Curtis Hathcock was the sniper that tried the shot 10 times, so I guess your guys were much better than he was.
@@JokersWild70 How is it an opinion if you have proof they couldn't make the shot? That sounds like a fact. I just watched the Oliver Stone doc from last year, now I don't know what to believe. I don't think we'll ever know the true story, but it being a conspiracy is definitely a possibility.
@@jameslindsay9272 By opinion, I'm saying that JFK's head wound DID NOT come from the depository. A shot from a rifle to the back of the head doesn't cause a person's head to first violently whip backwards. It would cause it to go forward. I don't like arguing semantics with people, and it sounds like you're pretty confident in your opinion.
@@JokersWild70 you don't know what the round would do, how many people have you shot in the head to compare? I've never seen another person shot in the head in real life, so I can't say what would happen
A lot of real world good and revelations resulted from the JFK movie. Stone deserves a lot more credit.
He deserves credit for making a very entertaining three hour movie. Sadly, he forgot to include any facts as to the case
One of the most important questions is to ask what Oswald’s involvement was in this thing assuming it WAS a conspiracy. Was he just the fall guy then?
The look on his face says (to me) "I've been played like a fiddle." That means nothing, granted. But, he's in custody for 48 hrs and there is no record of an interrogation? C'mon! Look up Thomas Vallee, who would have been the "Oswald of Chicago" if the hit had taken place there. It might've taken place in Miami if the SS hadn't caught wind of it and killed the motorcade portion of that visit.
Joe says the part about “I know some great marksmen, and that shot could have been done”. One note about that, all the marksmen that Joe would know became masters of that during a time with vastly improved military technology and training as it relates to what existed in 1963. Were there people putting up Chris Kyle numbers in ‘63? No.
There was a line in the original “JFK movie “. That always stuck out to me .
“ Who were the Winners “ in the JFK assassin !?? . Who had the most to gain ? I think we all know now .
The Fed. Presidential Order 11110
I went to the school back depository and looked out where Oswald shot JFK. I was shocked to see it wasn't that far a shot. It looks farther away in photos. That's my only comment. First time listening to you Joe and you do a great job. Congratulations on your success. I was at the Comedy Store a few years before you were there. Good luck.
Everybody who visits the TSBD says the same thing.
Correct. Also the Lincoln Kennedy was in was modified with an elevated back seat for him to be better seen by the crowd. At this angle the trajectory of the bullet makes perfect sense and Oswald could and in all likelihood did kill the President on his own.
@@cormacthem8406 I don't know about that... I think there was a shot from the grassy knoll.....I think there was probably 2 shooters...Maybe Oswald...maybe not...but at least 2 shooters
@@User39.there’s still be a tendency that gun shots has some sort reverberation that can cause to echo the same shot from distances often happens in hunting too
@@cormacthem8406from the evidence it felt as it seems that Lee was just at the right place at the right time
i feel like joe is really understating how hard those shots wouldve been lmao 😂😂 why is he so pressed about it? three shots in like three seconds adjusting for range for each shot on a bolt action rifle while the target is in a moving car??? come on joseph rogan
With one being a head shot from the front left🤯
If you visit the site it's not as far as a shot as people think it is
The shots aren’t hard IF you know the aim off at each distance. If Oswald used the scope, he would have to have held the crosshairs off the intended point of impact in both the vertical and horizontal axes (because of the unusual scope mount). If he used the iron sights, we know those were fixed at 200m. To hit at 81m (the head shot) the aim off would have been 12” low plus another 2” lower for the descending angle of the shot.
Oswald was never trained to make those kind of adjustments. There’s no way he knew how to make those shots.
1:30 Joe Rogan sounding exactly like my uncle at thanksgiving here like word for word
This guy made the movie,Joe your not telling him anything he doesn't already know.
I remember seeing JFK with my father and going into the cinema a boy and coming out a man. It really did feel like that on the way out, that my eyes had been opened to the world that I live in.
It was a movie, and a highly speculative interpretation of what went down.
@Bryan Mack Yes. I've always found it troubling that for millions of Americans, the Kennedy assassination was a formative political experience, based on the belief that Oswald didn't act alone.
And perhaps stone closed your eyes more, via misdirection. Read Michael Collins pipers in the jfk topic.
The shots were incredibly difficult for anyone. Do not forget that if Oswald did act alone not only did he pull off really good shots but he did so under the stress of him killing the President of the United States (even for a "professional " that has to make you nervous), plus the possible detection at any moment by doing it behind some boxes at an office building. I have no idea who may have been involved besides Oswald I just find it hard to believe he pulled off that level of marksmanship under those circumstances.
I feel like he had assistance from someone, somewhere definitely.. but wasn't he in the marines or navy or something like that as well? Maybe that's how he landed the shot as well..
Remember, Oswald missed his first shot, and he built a snipers perch for better shooting stability, and he was shooting at a Slow moving vehicle traveling in a straight line. Not that difficult when you know the Facts.
@seanmccconnell5303. All three shots were extremely easy at 57,75,87 yards , not “ incredibly difficult for anyone”.
@@radar0412Thanks.
@@jimtruscott5670 Everytime these conspiracy people try to push Oswald and all the evidence against him out the back door, Oswald always comes right back around to the front door. No one else ever shows up at the front door with evidence for the conspiracy theorist. Ever.
The most painful thing is watching Oliver Stone being interviewed because everyone tries multiple times to subtly and overtly ask Oliver a tough question that prompts him to throw himself under the bus and undermine his own credibility. Even after all these years people still get paid to try to trip this guy up.
& they will as long as a Bush draws a breath
The ARRB investigation is a gem - see Douglas Horne's five volume set.