Harvey Puts Stephen On The Stand | Suits
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 05. 2020
- Harvey takes a calculated risk by putting Stephen on the stand, but his gamble only winds up digging Ava in deeper.
Stream full seasons on Peacock: pck.tv/46kqJxO
Season 3, Episode 8 "Endgame": It's showtime as Ava's trial begins. Meanwhile, Jessica and Harvey confront Darby over Stephen's role in the murders.
Your favorite shows, movies and more are here. Stream now on Peacock: www.peacocktv.com
This is the official CZcams channel for Suits: home to all the swagger, smarts and sexiness from Pearson Hardman - one of the top New York law firms that hire solely from Harvard law. Well, almost entirely.
Subscribe for more Suits: bit.ly/2maVymH
Buy Suits Complete Series DVD Now: bit.ly/2paFnay
#Suits #HarveySpecter #JessicaPearson #StephenHuntley #LegalDrama #Lawyers #TopNetflixShows #Fights #NetflixParty - Zábava
Why didn’t Catelyn Stark & Lord Varys demand a trial by combat? Disappointing...
Yeah, with Donna fight with him
Because the mountain would have blown up someone's head
the kid True that
Because Lumberg is gonna make them all put cover sheets on their TPS reports
Because they are not in the 7 kingdoms anymore, they deal with things differently when they wear Suits.
The Ava Hessington arc is one of the best arcs of the show.
I actually hate this arc. The worst episode tho is when the Donna is created. Skipping it every time
Does Cameron Dennis hate Harvey aren’t they friends or frenemies
@@jonathanmkrtchyan7526 Harvey worked with Denis and they were very close at one point. Harvey left the DA office to join Jessica because she paid for his college.
Denis felt betrayed because he has a strong moral principle and felt like Harvey was chasing money not justice. Which is why he has a vendetta against him. But in the entire show Cameron Denis for the most part only wanted to put the guilty people away. That’s why in these scene you see Harvey trying to convince him who is the one actually at fault.
@@vedantharwani9278 so frenemies? Why did Stephen refuse to answer Harvey’s questions but denis was successful at breaking down Stephen? When someone in court says I decline to answer what do you usually do as a lawyer if you want to get someone to talk in court?
@@jonathanmkrtchyan7526
Well I’ll start with I’m not an expert on American law but from what I understand. The 5th allows you to not self incriminate yourself.
When a lawyers asks you questions in a court you have to answer truthfully, if it’s a criminal court you can take the 5th and not answer. Harvey can’t really do much, he could raise the matter in a civil court ( if applicable, it isn’t in this situation) other than that nothing.
The reason Steven answered Denis’s questions is because it allowed him to control the narrative. Denis asked questions that incriminated Ava, not Steven. While harvey asked questions that would’ve incriminated Steven.
So Harvey in this case needs to provide evidence to be able to prove his point because he can’t force Steven to legally say anything he doesn’t want to.
2:36 When Cameron walks to Harvey’s side of the court you just know he believes Harvey and Harvey’s smile confirms this… best show
This trial was everything
Might have to rewatch
This show is so far incredibly removed from how law is practiced in real life.
@@maxbolton5227 right? Half these fellas should have gotten disbarred first season lol. Drama for tv.
@@thebirdhasbeencharged first episode lol
@@maxbolton5227 of course it is, hence why it’s entertaining.
this is my favourite arc from the whole
series
My favourite is all the tanner arcs, especially the character development one.
I liked the short arc when Louis found out about Mike. Fork in the Road is my favorite episode
I agree this or the time Mike and Harvey faced off against Anita Gibbs
the worst is that mike in prison season, didnt feel it fr
Stephen literally told Harvey what he would do if he put him on the stand and he did that anyways...I kind of blame Harvey for not having planned anything and just trying to show how "gutsy" he is in the heat of the moment. Should've just waited until he had more proof.
His plan wasn't to convince the jury of his client's innocence or Stephen's guilt. He was trying to convince the prosecutor (his former boss and mentor) all of the above by emphasising Stephen's invocation of the 5th amendment.
@@mashhoodirfan4997 but his client is the one on trial and he just made it worse for her
But it worked. Because Cameron did ask Stephen about ordering the killings of those people.
Harvey wanted Cameron to know that Ava was innocent and that Stephen was the one behind the killings. And seeing Cameron asked that last question from Stephen does show that.
@@irfanali6224it worked just bc is a Tv show
@@robertmagnamara exactly, no one should answer that question if they don’t have to
When Cameran says 'can't blame the man for trying 😂 😂
That went better then I thought It could have
Varys is distracting me. Am I in the right show?
are they working for Catelyn too?
Please we wanna see more court/trial videos!
Suits declines your request
Compare his first entrance in the firm and all the entrances of Louis when he achieved something great
He can't actually selectively invoke his 5th amendment rights, though, precisely because it would create opportunities like this for him to make accusations without being subject to effective cross-examination. Once you start answering you have waived your 5th amendment rights.
One of the best seasons!
Which season
@@jerryalfa7205 3rd
Love this scene
Why they didn’t show Harvey beating Stephen
Fun law fact about this case. if you plead the fifth the judge has a right to revoke that right
I am just happy our University is being recognised RSA 🇿🇦 University of Cape Town.
If I had a dollar for every time the writers made these guys say “Are you thinking what I think you’re thinking?” or “If you’re thinking what I think you’re thinking…”, I’d be rich.
Lol Kat Stark and lord Varias
Ricky Bobby's dad is a better lawyer than I thought! Maybe it was from him driving with a cougar in the car....
😂😂😂😂😂😂
I decline to comment on my CZcams mysterious recommendations
But you already did
BINOD
I decline to answer to your comment
I decline to comment on most of the stuff on CZcams. But not this one 🤣🤣🤣
a historical case in suits
Is that Lord Varys and Catelyn Stark?
I miss Suits badly !!!
Games of Throne invaded Suits.
Nice to see Varys and Catleyn Stark reborn as regular people
he was trying to fix it
So technically, Harvey just made it worse for his client? 😅
Yep 😬
Yes. it goes to bite harvey's firm back later in the series where Ava hired Tanner and sued Harvey for mishandling her case.
Objection calls for speculation
A witness cannot decline to answer selective questions.
There is always the "Clinton" defense. "I don't remember. I have no recollection. I don't recall." It is the pleading the fifth without actually pleading the fifth. And it really only has a chance at working if you are as old as dirt.
What season and Episode is this?
Why couldn't they present the photograph of stephan and marague in rubgy team ?
It would have to be part of the evidence that can be called in as an exhibit. Given to both sides. So that both sides would then argue whether the photo was doctored.
About the only way around this is if it is a civil case without attorneys representing everybody and coming out of the woodwork.
How do you invoke the 5th to not answer who you went to school with in another country? That's not a criminal act.
5th amendment is against self incrimination and it applies to not only citizens but also legal residents of the country. In this situation this was used correctly
It doesn't matter whether it's a criminal act or not, so long as it could be used to incriminate you. That's why you don't have to say anything at all to the cops.
I don't understand, isn't declining to answer basically just saying "yes I did it"?
He’s not a US citizen, how does Stephen have a 5th amendment right?
Fifth Amendment rights are applicable to all criminal defendants, not just U.S. citizens. So a Brit or any other foreigner being tried in an American court is perfectly entitled to plead the Fifth in the same way that an American can.
It's based on jurisdiction, not nationality/citizenship.
Law of the land. Affects everyone on us soil
1:18 did Harvey just say ‘University of Cape Town’
Yes, colonel Mariga and the pipeline are in SA
The fitht shud be " I did it".
Game of Suits, here.
When you are testifying and you invoke the 5th amendment, you can't then answer some questions and not others, you have to not answer any questions, If you answer some questions you can be ordered by the court to answer all questions.
Can you still call the fifth even if you aren’t a US citizen?
Yep. Rights are dependent on jurisdiction not citizenship. Same way an american hre in the UK cannot plead the 5th.
Other than voting rights immigrants enjoy most other rights that us citizens have.
@@alexpalmer4825 Americans actually can invoke the 5th in the UK its part of treatys we have as allies
Donna is goals
Don’t get mad but after season 5 she got so annoying
@@ASS-tb3mq true but her and Harvey together were perfect
Donna character gott annoying after season 4.
man the audio blows
if they keep on pleeding the 5th then how on earth we can get the answers....
1:19
Season and episode number
what season was this ?
season 3
Previous
season 3 is all about Hessington oil
Why would you "decline to answer" a question asking if you murdered someone? Just say 'no'. If they can prove you did it you're going to jail anyway.
Since lying under oath is a crime. You will get more punishment. It's like digging a less deep hole for yourself. Might get lucky.
Because once you lie under oath then you entire testimony goes out the window. And this guy had an agenda. He wouldn't compromise it by lying.
@@ShrirajGPethe If you murdered someone you're going away for a long time anyway.
@@ShrirajGPethebruh your up against a jury saying “i decline to answer” sounds sus vs “No” also lying under oath is a slap on the wrist compared to say capital punishment
@Double Agent it doesn't sound sus, because that's the point of the fifth amendment. It's not allowed to be suspicious.
Doesnt " I decline to answer" literally mean yes?
No , it just means that you refuse to answer the question. The assumption is that only guilty people would decline to answer . But it isn't about whether or not you did a crime. It's about whether you did a crime in a provable way . Invoking the fifth amendment is not an admissable evidence of guilt in a courtroom.
@@Dictionary_ thank you for the info
@@Dictionary_ The 5th Amendment is almost like a get-out clause, surely? If you've nothing to hide and you're innocent why would you decline to answer? And if, say, you are innocent but don't want to incriminate someone then surely that would be perverting the course of justice and/or withholding potential evidence?
Also, why swear an oath to tell the truth but still be allowed to decline to answer? Make it make sense 🤷♀️🤔
@@YasmineSkyKD because it's being asked by the opposition who will do and use anything to make you lose, so you give them as little as you can
@@Oly1y But that doesn't explain it though. The opposition would do that anyway.
Dude this show reflects the real life activities in corporate sector.......i have learned lot of techniques..
Suits could never reply to me
Sadik Xhekaj they wouldn’t
Nice Try......!!
Uhhh context??
I have a question because I'm not a US citizen, can Stephen Huntley plead the fifth? He isn't an American citizen right?
Have the same Q - so thumbing this up.
@@sandilsrinivasan2976
Obligatory, I'm not a lawyer and hence I'll respond to this question to the best of my knowledge. But if someone reading this comment feels that I'm not correct, please feel free to correct me - I would appreciate it.
The courts have rules that you have the same rights as in the constitution as citizens, and all the same rights as citizens. The Fifth is a fundamental right and that right applies to anyone within USA, regardless of the fact whether they're a citizen of USA or not. I am not sure if it also applies to the "aliens" who enter USA illegally. The exception is situations which require you to be a citizen, such as voting, or some other issues such as immigration and things that specifically affect non-citizens. As far as I am aware, everyone within USA is protected under their fundamental rights, and hence it's important for anyone visiting USA to keep those rights in their mind - especially the Fourth Amendment right, which is right to a lawyer, if I remember correctly.
@@dhruvgargi3360 Not a lawyer either, but I think you are right. If I remember correctly, the US government does everything they can to get immigrants to not enter US soil, because as soon as they do, they have certain rights that a court can not ignore.
But Ava is not either so why are they trying to put her in American prison when her business is in England and her shady dealings where in Africa
@@dhruvgargi3360 The fourteenth amendment reads in part
"nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws"
note: any person, regardless of citizenship.
Without the 14th amendment none of the protections of the bill of rights would restrain the actions of state governments, only the federal government. Americans would in effect have no constitutional rights.
literally none of this could've happened in a real court
But Spiderman is real right?
Youre such a partypooper
Hostile witness for taking the 5th..ugh no.
whats happening?
Put in record let me see American power
I never really understood the 5th Amendment. Aren't you basically incriminating yourself by refusing to answer?
The jury aren't allowed to judge based on what you "imply"
@@MKL1613 but surely they unconsciously will take that into account?
@@46Bax yes but they aren't supposed to
@@MKL1613 That's...interesting. And here I thought it was entirely up to the jury to decide one way or the other.
@@SaiSivakumar you may want to look at how juries can work czcams.com/video/uqH_Y1TupoQ/video.html
That's....not how the 5th amendment works... at all.
Glad someone caught it, you either plead thr 5th for everything or answer all the questions asked of you, no middle ground but it's a tv show so we let it go for entertainment purposes.
@@qs4177 Even just a small knowledge of the law makes this whole series kinda hard to watch lol... but I still dig it.
The whole game of thrones cast in this scene
Why was Stephen saying I decline to answer isn’t the rule when testifying in court suppose to be you are allowed to testify tell the truth it’s mandatory to tell the truth instead of saying decline to answer isn’t Stephen breaking the rules of being testified what would you do if someone said I decline to answer what’s the solution into making them answer the question properly
American logic
can just decline to answer everything, no one is accountable for anything rofl
おk
l
The combative ramie corroboratively balance because shrimp interestingly excuse with a righteous ex-husband. aboriginal, selective cafe
Do Australians have 5th Amendment rights in the USA?
Everyone on US soil has theoretically the 5th Amendment right
I declined to comment
The snobbish oatmeal subcellularly seal because toothpaste ideally cross barring a thick geese. sticky, swanky agreement
The British accents of all the actors except Paula agard are beyond cringe inducing.
🤮🤮 "British" people
There's no such thing as a "British" accent and Max Beesley's accent (who plays Stephen) is using his real Lancashire / Manc accent. Christine Cole who plays Paula just has a middle class London accent, it's no better or more "British" than any of the others.
@@megan3206 🙄 what about Ava hessington and the bald guy?
@@pruray Both Conleth Hill (who plays Edward) and Michelle Fairley (who plays Ava) are from Northern Ireland so they are British actors. They do augment their accents to be more Londonised but I assure you they know what they are doing. Their accents are a million times better than any American actor I've seen doing a London accent. Michelle's is still very close to her actual accent and they both sound like real people you could find in London.
So technically, Harvey just made it worse for his client? 😅