Respected Sir, You are striving your best in order to enlight those students who have no access to universities like LUMS. It is great of you and what I personally think that I have never seen any intellectual like you who like to share his knowledge free of cost. You did your Degrees from West and it had cost you a lot yet you are an example of selflessness. My question What conditions compelled you to do such type of sacrifices like making a video out of your class and its sharing in public for all without any payment. What is that special thing that motivates you, that special thing that makes your heart big? Is it the education of the west that helped you broadminded? Kindly I will be extremely happy If I get a reply
These are really interesting lectures but perhaps a lecture isn't the best (or only) medium to discuss these topics? Maybe they don't leave room for nuance. I'd really appreciate a reading list alongside such videos for those who want to delve into more detail.
Wow 😮 sir your explanation is very detailed .... And really loved your video the way of your explanation super ... Intresting ... And very helpfull .. Please upload more videos . Thank you 😊
It’s up to one to find ones better self, but to do that, one has to look at ones inner self and find the truth of self within, to know thy self is to be true to oneself and others.
1:10 too bad we had to wiat for Hegel to know the thing initself.. But as Clouscard said : Kant saw the ting in itself, and as soon as he saw it he did pull the curtain on it. Sweep it under the carpet.
Your question papers of political science must be very logical and full of reason to attend. I think so... Sir, may i know your student's passing ratio?
@@Taimur_Laal Yes, Maybe you have busy schedule; Uniersity, Online lecturing, and ofcourse Laal. BTW, today I watched a movie, "Bhool ka Phool" after listening your review on it before your song, "Na tu Hindhu banega na Muslman". it is mater piece of; humanity, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, face-saving roles played by elites in the society, and coupled with other social evils.
The irony of Kant, is that he consider dialectics a abd things even tho he use them and make synthesis...... We have to wait Hegel to get to dialectics and have the laws of causalities be only a part of the totality and not the totality itself. Because law of casalities mostly apply to nature, but man is ruled by the equation sign and direction. "Sens/signe" I am saying in french because in French Sens = Meaning. We say in english "that doesn't make any sens, or come to youyr senses, but it mostly refer to physical sens, where teh french word, sens, mean meaning and orientation/direction.
Lol. What do you find below par, please highlight? The class is on political philosophy. And I am nearly quoting verbatim from Kant's essay. So I fail to see what you find problematic.
Taimur Rahman ,معذرت کیساتھ آپ کی ہر بات پر مجھے اعتراض ہے یہ جو طالب علم آپ کے سامنے بیٹھے ہیں آپ کا فرض بنتا ہے کہ آپ اپنے آپ کو بخیثیت مسلمان اپنے خیالات اور اپنی پوزیشن واضح کرو کہ آپ خود کانٹ یا دوسرے فلسفی کے بارے میں کیا راۓ رکھتے ہیں کیا آپ اس سے متفق ہیں یا نہیں اور پوری ایمانداری اس فلسفی کے فلسفے پر جو تنقید ہوئ ہے اور جو کمزوریاں نظر آرہی ہیں ساتھ ساتھ اس کو آشکارا کریں ، آپ کے لیکچر میں سنتا ہو ں آپ فلسفے کو تنقیدی انداز سے نہیں دیکھتے ہو اور نہ اپنی تنقید اس پر کرتے ہو، اس لیکچر میں صاف لگتا ہے کہ آپ ایک روشن خیال انسان ہو اور آپ کو پتہ ہے کہ کانٹ کے روشن خیالی کے تصور کے کو درست ماننے والا مسلمان کھبی بھی نہیں ہوسکتا، کیونکہ کانٹ اپنے مضمون انلائٹنمٹ میں روشن خیال انسان اس آدمی کو سمجھتا ہے جو ہدایت کیلئے کسی خارج (وخی ،اللہ ، قرآن اور دوسری الہامی کتاب سے ہدایت لینے والا نہ ہو )کا مختاج نہ ہو بلکہ وہ اپنے عقل کے مطابق خیر و شر کو جانچ سکتا ہو ، روشن خیال انسان کی تعریف کی رو سے مسلمان کھبی بھی روشن خیال نہیں ہوسکتا ، اس لیکچر کو سنو پروفیسر صاخب یہ آپ کی رہنمائ کرسکتا ہے www.mediafire.com/file/aydkbr076b36mbp/Suri__-Social_Scientific_Discourse-__1st_Day_-_3.WAV/file اس میں مزید لیکچرہے اتنا ٹائم تو آپ کے پاس نہیں ہوگا اس لنک میں مزید لیکچر کا سیریز ہے www.mediafire.com/folder/hv13tmu356oe5/Social_Scientific_Discourse
آپ مارکسسٹ ہو ، آپ سوشلزم کو اچھی طرح جانتے ہواگر وقت ملے ہو تو ڈاکٹر عبدالوہاب سوری کے گوگل پر کچھ آرٹیکل اور لیکچرز ہے اگر آپ اس پر اپنی ریویو ایک ویڈیو یا کچھ لکھو تو ہمیں خوشی ہوگی،
@@Khan-v3y no that is not the way I teach. That is not what is required of the course. And that is not the correct way to teach either. Because the course does not require me to teach my views on Kant but to teach the views of Kant on the world. If you have been taught in the former manner then that is your badqismati.
![John Stuart Mill [Eng]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NnxQBeCmQvw/mqdefault.jpg)
![John Stuart Mill [Eng]](/img/tr.png)
![John Locke [Eng]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-HOMtKQyGcg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Mod Phil 7: Hegel's Philosophy of History [Eng]](/img/n.gif)
9:00, we need more teachers like this, honest and upright
You are really a great instructor. Thank you from a European freemason!
He is explaining in local language, how are u decoding it??
When you are powerful and living beyond means, it's ur responsibility to prove it.
Respected Sir,
You are striving your best in order to enlight those students who have no access to universities like LUMS.
It is great of you and what I personally think that I have never seen any intellectual like you who like to share his knowledge free of cost. You did your Degrees from West and it had cost you a lot yet you are an example of selflessness.
My question
What conditions compelled you to do such type of sacrifices like making a video out of your class and its sharing in public for all without any payment.
What is that special thing that motivates you, that special thing that makes your heart big?
Is it the education of the west that helped you broadminded?
Kindly I will be extremely happy If I get a reply
My motivation is that I am a socialist. And as a socialist, I believe that education should be free and universal. Then society will grow and develop.
The lecture was really interesting..
I did hear him so carefully..
You're amazing sir..
Future might be more brighter with these kind educations in Pakistan.
I am an Indian. Good lectures
These are really interesting lectures but perhaps a lecture isn't the best (or only) medium to discuss these topics? Maybe they don't leave room for nuance. I'd really appreciate a reading list alongside such videos for those who want to delve into more detail.
Wow 😮 sir your explanation is very detailed .... And really loved your video the way of your explanation super ... Intresting ... And very helpfull ..
Please upload more videos .
Thank you 😊
Kamal..... 👏👏
Thankyou !
Respect & prayers
It’s up to one to find ones better self, but to do that, one has to look at ones inner self
and find the truth of self within, to know thy self is to be true to oneself and others.
lucky I found your channel
sir bundle of thanks .
Yaar yeh 🙏🏽 app apna bundle rehn dien
Bundle of thanks ni hota ..abndn of thnx hota ha
👍👍👍
great Sir ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Rising Tide lifts all boats.
wow i wanna replace my teacher with this professor ngl. he made class look fun and i understood him unlike my teacher smh
hi homie
1:10 too bad we had to wiat for Hegel to know the thing initself.. But as Clouscard said : Kant saw the ting in itself, and as soon as he saw it he did pull the curtain on it. Sweep it under the carpet.
Your question papers of political science must be very logical and full of reason to attend. I think so... Sir, may i know your student's passing ratio?
I've never calculated it.
@@Taimur_Laal Yes, Maybe you have busy schedule; Uniersity, Online lecturing, and ofcourse Laal. BTW, today I watched a movie, "Bhool ka Phool" after listening your review on it before your song, "Na tu Hindhu banega na Muslman". it is mater piece of; humanity, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, face-saving roles played by elites in the society, and coupled with other social evils.
Islam and enlightenment plz sir hv lecture on it
I remember you were philosopher..Can you please tell me your name?
"I.kant"
Cool!
Sir, you did not touch his work " "critique of pure reason."
I assume you kant do that..🤣
F me please send our n pics are you interested f with me
sir plz Urdu ma b upload kirlo
The irony of Kant, is that he consider dialectics a abd things even tho he use them and make synthesis......
We have to wait Hegel to get to dialectics and have the laws of causalities be only a part of the totality and not the totality itself. Because law of casalities mostly apply to nature, but man is ruled by the equation sign and direction. "Sens/signe" I am saying in french because in French Sens = Meaning. We say in english "that doesn't make any sens, or come to youyr senses, but it mostly refer to physical sens, where teh french word, sens, mean meaning and orientation/direction.
I have been trying to understand his work.
But sorry I kant. 🤣
sir plz urdu ma ye lecure zrori tha
I just kant stand his philosophy.😄
Bhai plz urdu
Channel name is "Taimur Rahman - Urdu"... lecture is mostly in English
Where is it,s critical analysis?
Sometimes you speak very Pakistani English 😳
He is Pakistani, Jon Nayoo
Oh my God, this is the level of a professor of philosophy of the so-called distinguished institute of Pakistan he is so incompetent.
Lol. What do you find below par, please highlight? The class is on political philosophy. And I am nearly quoting verbatim from Kant's essay. So I fail to see what you find problematic.
Ah, now I see from your other post why you don't like what I am saying. It is the usual theistic point of view. Thanks for your comment.
Taimur Rahman ,معذرت کیساتھ آپ کی ہر بات پر مجھے اعتراض ہے یہ جو طالب علم آپ کے سامنے بیٹھے ہیں آپ کا فرض بنتا ہے کہ آپ اپنے آپ کو بخیثیت مسلمان اپنے خیالات اور اپنی پوزیشن واضح کرو کہ آپ خود کانٹ یا دوسرے فلسفی کے بارے میں کیا راۓ رکھتے ہیں کیا آپ اس سے متفق ہیں یا نہیں اور پوری ایمانداری اس فلسفی کے فلسفے پر جو تنقید ہوئ ہے اور جو کمزوریاں نظر آرہی ہیں ساتھ ساتھ اس کو آشکارا کریں ، آپ کے لیکچر میں سنتا ہو ں آپ فلسفے کو تنقیدی انداز سے نہیں دیکھتے ہو اور نہ اپنی تنقید اس پر کرتے ہو، اس لیکچر میں صاف لگتا ہے کہ آپ ایک روشن خیال انسان ہو اور آپ کو پتہ ہے کہ کانٹ کے روشن خیالی کے تصور کے کو درست ماننے والا مسلمان کھبی بھی نہیں ہوسکتا، کیونکہ کانٹ اپنے مضمون انلائٹنمٹ میں روشن خیال انسان اس آدمی کو سمجھتا ہے جو ہدایت کیلئے کسی خارج (وخی ،اللہ ، قرآن اور دوسری الہامی کتاب سے ہدایت لینے والا نہ ہو )کا مختاج نہ ہو بلکہ وہ اپنے عقل کے مطابق خیر و شر کو جانچ سکتا ہو ، روشن خیال انسان کی تعریف کی رو سے مسلمان کھبی بھی روشن خیال نہیں ہوسکتا ، اس لیکچر کو سنو پروفیسر صاخب یہ آپ کی رہنمائ کرسکتا ہے
www.mediafire.com/file/aydkbr076b36mbp/Suri__-Social_Scientific_Discourse-__1st_Day_-_3.WAV/file
اس میں مزید لیکچرہے اتنا ٹائم تو آپ کے پاس نہیں ہوگا اس لنک میں مزید لیکچر کا سیریز ہے
www.mediafire.com/folder/hv13tmu356oe5/Social_Scientific_Discourse
آپ مارکسسٹ ہو ، آپ سوشلزم کو اچھی طرح جانتے ہواگر وقت ملے ہو تو ڈاکٹر عبدالوہاب سوری کے گوگل پر کچھ آرٹیکل اور لیکچرز ہے اگر آپ اس پر اپنی ریویو ایک ویڈیو یا کچھ لکھو تو ہمیں خوشی ہوگی،
@@Khan-v3y no that is not the way I teach. That is not what is required of the course. And that is not the correct way to teach either. Because the course does not require me to teach my views on Kant but to teach the views of Kant on the world. If you have been taught in the former manner then that is your badqismati.