Can animals evolve to deal with climate change? - The Climate Question, BBC World Service

SdĂ­let
VloĆŸit
  • čas pƙidĂĄn 5. 07. 2022
  • Climate change is bringing rising temperatures, droughts and shifting patterns of rainfall - can animals adapt to keep pace?
    Click here to subscribe to our channel đŸ‘‰đŸœ bbc.in/3VyyriM
    There is evidence that bird’s bodies are growing smaller, their wingspan longer, lizards are growing larger thumb pads to help them grip more tightly in hurricane strength winds and beak size is changing.
    We visit the Galapagos, where evolution was first discovered by Charles Darwin, and investigate the many ways animals are adapting their behaviour and physiology to survive the impact of climate change. Changes to climate are also influencing animals’ genetics, meaning that we are seeing species evolve within our own lifetime.
    However, most animals won’t be able to adapt quickly enough to cope with the speed they need to in order to survive in a warming world.
    Find more videos on climate change and the environment here: ‱ The Climate Question
    ----------------
    This is the official BBC World Service CZcams channel.
    If you like what we do, you can also find us here:
    Instagram đŸ‘‰đŸœ / bbcworldservice
    Twitter đŸ‘‰đŸœ / bbcworldservice
    Facebook đŸ‘‰đŸœ / bbcworldservice
    BBC World Service website đŸ‘‰đŸœ www.bbc.co.uk/worldserviceradio
    Thanks for watching and subscribing!
    #BBCWorldService #WorldService
    #bbcworldservice #climatechange #evolution

Komentáƙe • 57

  • @yuniakaminska5385
    @yuniakaminska5385 Pƙed 10 měsĂ­ci +3

    Interesting, thank you ❀

  • @stevefitt9538
    @stevefitt9538 Pƙed rokem +9

    Yes, the climate has been changing during all of deep time. However, the rate of change matters a lot. And, the current rate is 100 to 1000 times the normal or even abnormal rate of change. So, I think vertebrates are screwed if close to the worst case is what we cause to happen. OTOH, insects breed so fast and can often fly, so they will do better.

  • @nguyenkimdung2142
    @nguyenkimdung2142 Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci

    awesome

  • @donutemptycircle8717
    @donutemptycircle8717 Pƙed rokem +3

    Adaptation takes time. There is no time. It's not difficult. Extinction is now the only game in town.

    • @nobody8328
      @nobody8328 Pƙed rokem

      Eh. Lots of critters will survive long enough to reproduce, and of those many of the species will survive long enough to adapt.
      Things with low metabolisms and high reproductive rates will do just fine. Insects, worms and fungi that can live on decomposition absolutely thrive. Think house flys, cockroaches and earthworms.
      Larger critters with low metabolisms will also be ok. Reptiles in general, and specifically alligators and crocodiles and snakes should keep thriving for another 5 million years, easy.
      Things that live in caves or burrows will have an advantage too, much like the tunneling mammals that survived Chixalube (sp?)
      Most importantly, there are complicated live forms in deep caves and around hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the oceans that don't know we're here now, and certainly won't miss us. Life itself will be fine no matter what we manage to do to the poor planet.
      Unfortunately, humans are also ridiculously adaptive as are many of the plants and animals we've domesticated.

    • @petercollins7848
      @petercollins7848 Pƙed rokem +1

      The whole idea of ‘evolution’ and ‘adaption’ is just a load of nonsense. Ask yourself, where are the millions of intermediate species and ‘adaptions’ if the theory of evolution is true?

    • @s.unosson
      @s.unosson Pƙed 4 měsĂ­ci

      Adaptation can be rapid. Even the changes in the beak form and size of the famous Galapagos finches actually happen rapidly, at a rhythm of a couple of years. The main known mechanism behind adaptation is epigenetic variations which are also reversible. The Neo-Darwinian explanation of random DNA mutations is not in line with the latest scientific discoveries in this field.

  • @volkerengels5298
    @volkerengels5298 Pƙed rokem +3

    Jump to: 22:00
    You get the answer - with out listening to some interesting sweet sugar-talk.

  • @rahulc4403
    @rahulc4403 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

    Seals đŸ§˜â€â™€ïž

  • @flycamshots
    @flycamshots Pƙed 8 měsĂ­ci

    in my opinion, yes we can adapt to climate change but it has to change more slowly than the current situation. we need more time than we think . the earth should be hotter 5 degree celsius in the next 1000 years.

  • @mdnazmulnazmul3639
    @mdnazmulnazmul3639 Pƙed 8 měsĂ­ci +1

    Climate change has become a latest shock

  • @primuspilus858
    @primuspilus858 Pƙed rokem +1

    These CC weirdos crack me up. LMAO! "They're altogether OOKY, the CC family!"

  • @s.unosson
    @s.unosson Pƙed 4 měsĂ­ci

    This is about adaptation, not evolution in the Darwinian sense, nor in the Neo-Darwinian sense. And that adaptation happens all the time in a time frame of a few years. The main today known system behind it is epigenetics, a rapid, reversible, fluctuating adaptation.

  • @dimamatat5548
    @dimamatat5548 Pƙed rokem +3

    Will humanity evolve too? After all, we are not special

    • @s.unosson
      @s.unosson Pƙed 4 měsĂ­ci

      I would call it adaptation.

    • @dimamatat5548
      @dimamatat5548 Pƙed 4 měsĂ­ci

      @@s.unosson So, drought-resistant crops, walls to protect from floods, air conditioning, etc.?

    • @s.unosson
      @s.unosson Pƙed 4 měsĂ­ci

      @@dimamatat5548 Humans live already in all sorts of climate. As the video shows living organisms adapt quite rapidly, without having to wait millions of years for a random mutation that might help. But of course the climate change is a challenge to be taken seriously.

  • @JimmyTimmy-wh8dz
    @JimmyTimmy-wh8dz Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci +1

    I was born a fish and then grew legs when I got beached..I was a monkey then I left the other monkeys behind to become what I am today.

    • @s.unosson
      @s.unosson Pƙed 4 měsĂ­ci

      I am a Galapagos finch and change the size and form of my beak continuously thanks to epigenetic adaptation, I don't need millions of years for that.

  • @nicolaasfourie
    @nicolaasfourie Pƙed 8 měsĂ­ci

    They've dealt with climate change since the dawn of life.

    • @No-cg9kj
      @No-cg9kj Pƙed 5 měsĂ­ci

      You do realize that 95% of species that ever lived are extinct, right? Even when climate change was slow and gradual, there were still many species that have gone extinct.
      Maybe actually study some biology.

  • @user-fu2xy8dw6t
    @user-fu2xy8dw6t Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci +1

    áž…áŸáž‰áž‘áŸ…áž•áŸ’ážŸáž¶ážšáž›áž‘áŸ’áž’áž·áž”áŸ’ážšáž‡áž¶áž’áž·áž”ážáŸáž™áŸ’áž™ážąáž‰
    ážąáž¶áž‚áŸ’áž˜áž¶áž“áž”áŸ’ážšáž™áŸ„áž‡áž“áŸ បសមានប្រយោជន៍ជាប់គុក 😂 ( ážáŸ’áž‰áž»áŸ†ážáž¶áž–ážœáž€ážąáž¶ážąážáŸ‹ážŸáž˜áŸ’áž›áŸáž„ážšáŸ†áž›áŸ„áž—ážŸáž·áž‘áŸ’áž’áž·áž˜áž“áž»ážŸáŸ’ážŸáž‘áŸ ពើរ កម្មវិធឞ ផ្ការណប)

  • @nargis3764
    @nargis3764 Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci

    I need a partner to speaking english . Who is volunteer ?

  • @s.unosson
    @s.unosson Pƙed 4 měsĂ­ci

    Have a look at epigenetics, dear researchers.

  • @user-mw3jq9yh9x
    @user-mw3jq9yh9x Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci

    ㅈㅅㅗ밬ㅣ

  • @lw1zfog
    @lw1zfog Pƙed 10 měsĂ­ci

    luckily for you lot, Bill Hates has promised to SRM that AGW into submission with more of his fully tested, safe & effective ‘$CIENCE!â„ąïžâ€™. Believe !

  • @katyg3873
    @katyg3873 Pƙed rokem +1

    Well the climate has been changing for hundreds of thousands of years and creatures have adapted so far.

    • @MKelly1923
      @MKelly1923 Pƙed rokem +2

      It's not changed at the rate it currently is though and that drastically increases the challenge!

    • @oldmanbiscuit7518
      @oldmanbiscuit7518 Pƙed rokem

      ​​@@MKelly1923 yes, you're right. the ice age never happened. the earth has never been all tropics. infact. a mini ice age never happened 400 years ago.

    • @jbyrd655
      @jbyrd655 Pƙed rokem +4

      Ah yes, ingorance is (apparently) truly bliss; the 'climate' has been 'changing' for at least 4.6 billion years, and the 'mini ice age' was a local almost non-event that took place in northwesten Europe "400 years ago".
      As Mark remarks, the difference is the rate of change, and, as he doesn't, another of the many problems is that the issue is global (unlike the oft-quoted 'little ice age' of denier fame)...

    • @oldmanbiscuit7518
      @oldmanbiscuit7518 Pƙed rokem

      @@jbyrd655 lol "north western europe". It was all of Europe and America. Also, were still in the ice age. A period of an ice age called "the interglacial period". The period where the earth gets warmer before freezing again. You alarmists aren't very intelligent.

    • @oldmanbiscuit7518
      @oldmanbiscuit7518 Pƙed rokem

      @Shep Raynham if the earth wants things to go extinct, there's nothing we can do to stop it. It's a never ending cycle that has always happened, and will continue long after we're gone. Of course the 6th extintion event is under way. 2.4 million years ago the earth went through its most drastic change it ever had. That's last week in earth years. The ice melted 11,000 years ago. The earth is in shock still. It's going to keep up its tantrums for the next million years or so. Nothing we can do about it. Sure we can stop carbon emissions. That will work out great until 3 volcanoes blow and put more pollutants into the air than we did in the span of 100 years. Falling for a political power grab is just foolish. Think to your self. If it was about climate change then why are they pushing solutions that still need petroleum? Yes, even wind mills need patroleum based lube to operate. Why not a push for nuclear? You know why? Because they know there's nothing they can do. They just take advantage of naive people with an authority bias.

  • @MrRobertFarr
    @MrRobertFarr Pƙed rokem

    Robbo FARR. He can dwibble like George Ware. He, just keeps getting better.
    They, say he is going to be Prime Minister and, finance a children's home.
    Recieve his Footballer of the year award, and stand on stage with A Wagner. But, just give the award to A Wagner. He might even, let an actor. Take, on the great name, he has built for himself. And, play on well past the time other players, are blinded from heading the ball, like Edgar David's. Or, crippled like Ronaldo, from trying to kick the ball too hard!
    He can dwibble the ball, into the net, and hunch over the ball like Maradona. So the lofty great big lanky awkward giant athletes of today can't see the ball and feel sowwy for him with cute his habit of, misspelling words.
    He, can. Recieve the passes, and take on the goalkeeper. He can push that big fatty out the way. No problems.
    Gosh, I would pay £200 to see him play once again. 😁

    • @merlemondesire4721
      @merlemondesire4721 Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci

      Ok I is ok 8 of it I don't ikr like if it is in in Ohio oil k my

  • @garryclegg6499
    @garryclegg6499 Pƙed rokem +1

    It's a physop. Just ask yourself who benefits big corporations. Wake up sheep.

    • @garryclegg6499
      @garryclegg6499 Pƙed rokem

      @@___.51 it's not about profit its about control. They can switch us on and of at will.

    • @MrRobertFarr
      @MrRobertFarr Pƙed rokem

      Physop is not really a word!

    • @garryclegg6499
      @garryclegg6499 Pƙed rokem

      @@MrRobertFarr y tel m y nt un sta wht am sying y idt.

    • @MrRobertFarr
      @MrRobertFarr Pƙed rokem

      @@garryclegg6499 What are you saying Mr Clegg?

    • @garryclegg6499
      @garryclegg6499 Pƙed rokem

      @@MrRobertFarr work it out if you think your intelligent.

  • @loanphuong1638
    @loanphuong1638 Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci

    Damn tell the africans to have fewer kids

    • @impressionist4821
      @impressionist4821 Pƙed 8 měsĂ­ci

      Climate change happens mostly not because of overpopulation but because of the overconsumption of developed countries