This test is in Europe and Toyota over there didn’t have air bags but in the us air bags where demanded in 1994 and if you don’t have a front airbag you can’t sell the vehicle
The reason its like that is because new cars are designed to crumple partially. If not, all the momentum from the car will go to you, so even with a seatbelt, yould go flying.
Then tell me that it’s not worth getting a newer car and make the payments. Had a 2018 civic that literally saved my ass in a 10 time rollover. My older previous 2006 forester wouldn’t have kept me alive as well.
I still love 90s boxy cars because id rather die fast than pay hundreds of thousands of hospital bills and be in pain for the rest of my life having a debilitating physical illness. Just me?
You wouldn’t die fast if it’s a low-speed accident, which would leave you potentially paralyzed (in the old car) instead of mildly injured (in the new car).
Because cars were as advanced so they didn’t have airbags or better materials because if they use better materials because of the slower, they wouldn’t work as much so that’s why they were less safe
Airbags still cut the shit out of your face if you hit your head in the dashboard as they deploy, cause that’s what 9 year old me had to go through. But at the same time, mom’s car was from 2010…
If the world just drove safe, without any car to inorganic obstacle collisions, I doubt youwould ever have to worry. Even in a speedy rust bucket, you won't die just from coming into contact with any unexpected wildlife, at night.
yeah my ‘93 eagle talon will near 100% kill me in a wreck! i mean a car from the 90’s that has the capability of going 145mph from the factort is just asking for problems!
Maybe vehicles built on certain years 25 plus years should be banned on the highways due to their lack of safety in a crash? Should they only be allowed to drive slow and on secondary roads only?
Modern vehicles aren't entirely out of plastic. 90s vehicle may be of metal but it doesn't have a security cell made of strong metal as modern vehicles do. The 90's car got until the security cell of the modern one. 90's security cell destroyed with human inside.
You stripped all the safety equipment that actually did come on the 1990s Camry like front airbags also in a real life situation I’ve actually driven a 1991 Toyota Camry my step dad owned one many years ago and it’s a very pleasant experience. I’d still choose a Camry over a car with crumble zones steel will always beat crumble zones and all crumble zones are is a fancy way of saying instead of putting steal all over the entire car let’s reduce emissions and increase fuel efficiency and let’s stiffen the weak points of impact with a stiffer variant of steel compound in those areas only and fill the other areas with plastic and aluminum.
Google:Airbags were made in early 1970s
Toyota in 80s and 90s:Nah fuck Airbags we live life on the edge
back then they were more expensive and they became mandatory only in 1995
My 95 Tacoma only has a driver side airbag, was listed as a feature.
airbags are mandatory in 1995
cars before 1995 :
This test is in Europe and Toyota over there didn’t have air bags but in the us air bags where demanded in 1994 and if you don’t have a front airbag you can’t sell the vehicle
My first car was a 1994 BMW 740iL. No airbags at all, but it was a tank. Volvo was one of the few companies using airbags before they were mandatory.
#1 They’re both Toyota Corollas
#2 Airbags for the win
#3 Crush points are better in the newer model.
Yes
the new corolla is the size and weight of a 90's avensis
I was about to correct you because the caption says mazda, but upon closer inspection, that is a corolla.... ig toyota and mazda are partners
The reason its like that is because new cars are designed to crumple partially. If not, all the momentum from the car will go to you, so even with a seatbelt, yould go flying.
we dont need features to keep humans alive we need population control we are overcrowded
While Tesla cybertruck:
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢🤕🤕🤕🤕🤕🤒🤒🤒🤒😷😷😷😷🤧🤧🤧🤧🤢🤢🤢🤢😱😱😱😨😨😨😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😓😓😓
@@chanthakuyhii Cambodian 😮
2016 car is not Mazda it's a toyota.
They are actually sold under Mazda brand name in some countries i think
@@zzoinks Stop at 0:01 and you can clearly see that the badge is Toyota.
I wanna see a full sized full frame 2.3 ton 1970s cadillac or lincoln against the toyota!!
Its a Scion not a Toyota
@@randomthingsstuff6591 Toyota cars are sold under the Scion brand in some countries.
Also what’s the point replying to a 2 year old comment lol.
The survivor got me dying tho☠️
Unlike the dummy in the 90's car
"Mazda al"
The very obvious toyota: am I a joke to you?
Love finding an engine in my lap. Makes my day ❤
In a 1950's car this happens
Wow it’s almost like it’s newer and better tech and design
Is not a 1998 toyota camery that's a 1998 toyota crollla
It's not a crollla either
@@zacjohnson8404yeah your right it’s a Corolla
They’re both Corollas
bruh its not even a crolla its a corolla
Then tell me that it’s not worth getting a newer car and make the payments. Had a 2018 civic that literally saved my ass in a 10 time rollover. My older previous 2006 forester wouldn’t have kept me alive as well.
Idk man I was in a 92 civic that hit a knee wall at 65 then rolled 4 times I walked away. I think it's just very situational lol
People should talk about why there aren't crash ratings for SUV/light trucks and sedans
There literally is
What are you talking about, they're there just like all the other cars
This is why cars cost more. At least you live.
They cost triple. 😅
They also can't survive a deer.
Mm yes, the ‘camery.’
I still love 90s boxy cars because id rather die fast than pay hundreds of thousands of hospital bills and be in pain for the rest of my life having a debilitating physical illness. Just me?
Mad respect cause I rather do with the hospital than with the funeral
You wouldn’t die fast if it’s a low-speed accident, which would leave you potentially paralyzed (in the old car) instead of mildly injured (in the new car).
imagine the guy died with legs cut
Both got destroyed but one of them is safer
I think people here talking about it, that’s why the IIHS created a whole new kind of crash test for this exact impact because of it
Thats Corolla VS Corolla.
No one is talking about it because they most likely expect that to be the result.
A lot of people think metal vehicles are safer than plastic ones..
@@cjsantos6247plastic cars?
That’s a 80s car
It says 1998 Toyota on the hood
No one is talking about it cause they failed to make the drivers seat they put it on right
The seat wasn’t the problem 😂
Because cars were as advanced so they didn’t have airbags or better materials because if they use better materials because of the slower, they wouldn’t work as much so that’s why they were less safe
Am I the only one who thought they had real people in it, like my heart stopped for a sec-
No one‘s talking about it because the results are obvious
Because there are always myths about old things being durable in every aspect.
Almost like technology because more advanced over the years.
It seems like the modern cars have airbags. The older 1998 car doesnt have an airbag which would make even more chances of death from an car crash
That sent CHILLS down my SPINE :SKULL: :GHOST:
*2016 Has Beef With The 1990s*
Me and my friends are driving in GTA be like😂😂😂😂
The 90s toyota:No airbags,we die like real men
Airbags still cut the shit out of your face if you hit your head in the dashboard as they deploy, cause that’s what 9 year old me had to go through. But at the same time, mom’s car was from 2010…
I never talked about it because I never knew
The 1998 bro just got demolished
If the world just drove safe, without any car to inorganic obstacle collisions, I doubt youwould ever have to worry. Even in a speedy rust bucket, you won't die just from coming into contact with any unexpected wildlife, at night.
I remember being a kid watching these video before becoming a car guy 😭😭
If me and the boys got a car:
The reason nobody talks about them is because nobody who owns a 90s corrola is concerned about safety
Bro in the old Toyota got freaking obliterated💀💀💀💀
Bro kiss the airbag💀💀💀
The 1999 car then it had a airbag that's too dangerous
no air bag too dang
This guy is clearly a Mazda fan if he’s saying that the white Toyota Corolla is a mazda
Rolecage has entered the chat
Lived but with terrible injuries
Me thinking that 1998 toyota camery and 2016 Mazda ai is real: 👁️ 👄 👁️
About my calculations. Cars that realese 80s to 90s doesn’t have airbag . It release on 2009
No? Airbags became mandatory in 1998.
yeah my ‘93 eagle talon will near 100% kill me in a wreck! i mean a car from the 90’s that has the capability of going 145mph from the factort is just asking for problems!
blud got out in a rule 1 💀
'Died'
Yeah no shit bruh
1998 Toyota Corolla vs 2015 Toyota Corolla
Yes
Because of the airbags
"no air bags we die like real men"
Even wheni looked at the airbag and wanted to sleep at it.
Airbags are not the main thing of safety
Build quality is the main thing
Maybe vehicles built on certain years 25 plus years should be banned on the highways due to their lack of safety in a crash? Should they only be allowed to drive slow and on secondary roads only?
is no one talking about the 2016 car looks like a renault
No one talks about it cuz it’s so obvious that we don’t need to talk about it
Not the old Corolla 😢
Toyota Quality: 🤮
Volvo quality: 💀
Modern vehicles aren't entirely out of plastic. 90s vehicle may be of metal but it doesn't have a security cell made of strong metal as modern vehicles do. The 90's car got until the security cell of the modern one. 90's security cell destroyed with human inside.
I noticed it wasn't a 1973 Cadillac 75 series against the 2016 Mazda.
Sound is 💀
Okay now crash test an 80s Volvo 740 with a 2016 Corolla
No crap the old car will do worse in the crash test
bro kissed on that thing 😳
What did you expect? It’s old😂
That's not a car, it's a bicycle
Blud is blind💀
The black car's airbag didn't come out!?
Camry is 🔥
Bc what you’re dealing daily isn’t an old car. Those got more steel and heavier than!
The 90s car isn't old enough
just put some ice on it they’ll be fine
Because they don't give a shit and so do I.
Unless someone you love is driving one of those crap cars my friend
How about: old vs old
That wasn’t a real person inside
You stripped all the safety equipment that actually did come on the 1990s Camry like front airbags also in a real life situation I’ve actually driven a 1991 Toyota Camry my step dad owned one many years ago and it’s a very pleasant experience.
I’d still choose a Camry over a car with crumble zones steel will always beat crumble zones and all crumble zones are is a fancy way of saying instead of putting steal all over the entire car let’s reduce emissions and increase fuel efficiency and let’s stiffen the weak points of impact with a stiffer variant of steel compound in those areas only and fill the other areas with plastic and aluminum.
Wait- when was this?
Car ate made to be destroyed easily to obsorb more of the impact
Because we aren't in the 90s mo more.thay why
Wrong names
Correct:
1998 Toyota Corolla
2015 Toyota Corolla
I don’t care I’m still driving the classics
2016 is a Toyota Auris
90s cars did not have airbags
Wow🤩
teslas are WAY safer then all cars except for 2.
Nah I'd Survive
The air bag
1998 toyota corolla not have a airbang 😮😮
Both of this car is i think corolla
Bc it’s common sense that the newer ones driver is going to live，🤓
or the 2000s car done more damage? 🤔
Take even older cars.
And all those years ago people usually didn't wear seatbelts.
Some utterly horrific carnage.
BRO WHAT DID U EXPECTED A OLD CAR CRASHING?
Both are coroll😢
Bro is old Corolla vs new Corolla type e
Bro this song its a Pubg mobile Battlegrounds
lol cars from the 70s were safer
That's not a 90s its 80s
It’s a 2015 Toyota Corolla and a 1998 Toyota Corolla
2015 toyota corolla