How Sun's Lost Twin Is Still Affecting The Solar System
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- In the 1980s, astronomers proposed that the Sun actually had an evil trouble-making twin called Nemesis that swings past the solar system every 26-27 million years. Its gravitational turbulence sends a cloud of comets hurtling our way. And it's possible that the twin was the culprit that kicked an asteroid into Earth's orbit, which eventually collided with our planet, triggering the fifth mass extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs.
But the question is that if Nemesis is out there, where do we search for it?
REFERENCES:
[Paper] Embedded binaries and their dense cores, Sadavoy and Stahler, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society - bit.ly/3mDXCTA
[Article] Our Sun May Have Been Born With a Trouble-Making Twin Called 'Nemesis,' Mike Mcrae - ScienceAlert - bit.ly/3ZYOasx
[Press Release] New Evidence That All Stars are Born in Pairs, Robert Sanders, Berkley News - bit.ly/3ynbbtk
[Article] Nemesis Star Theory: The Sun's 'Death Star' Companion, Space.com - bit.ly/3J1JxH3
Created by: Rishabh Nakra and Simran Buttar
Narrated by: Jeffrey Smith
Since most exosystems have planets several times Jupiter's size and our sun is a yellow dwarf, the primorial cloud was probably pretty light, so the most logical type of twin for our sun would likely be a brown dwarf.
If that is the case, then that might explain why it is so hard to find it. Brown dwarfs are too small and far too dim to detect by ordinary telescopes and detectors.
@@KingLimbo05 Also, it might explain the weird orbits of some objects in the Kuiper Belt.
"In January 2015, California Institute of Technology astronomers Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown announced - based on mathematical calculations and simulations - that there could be a giant planet lurking far beyond Neptune. Several teams are now on the search for this theoretical "Planet Nine," and research suggests it could be located within the decade.
This large object, if it exists, could help explain the movements of some objects in the Kuiper Belt, an icy collection of objects beyond Neptune's orbit. Brown has already discovered several large objects in that area that in some cases rivaled or exceeded the size of Pluto. (His discoveries were one of the catalysts for changing Pluto's status from planet to dwarf planet in 2006.) [As an aside, our moon is larger than Pluto.]
But scientists are pursuing another theory, too: that "Planet Nine" could in fact be a grapefruit-sized black hole, warping space similarly to the way a gigantic planet would, and yet another team suggests that the weird movements of the far-flung Kuiper Belt occupants could be the collective influence of several small objects, not an undiscovered planet or black hole at all." (From: www.space.com/35695-weirdest-solar-system-facts.html)
Nope sun ain't even yellow its white
@@vapaperboimore accurately, isn't the sun like really light yellow? Cuz that's what G type stars are like (iirc)
When I first heard about Nemesis back in the 1990s I was breaking up with a girlfriend. She kept coming around every couple of weeks to get random things she "left" at my house and to stir up shit. I named her Nemisis.
could’ve declared that as “trespassing.”
😂💀💀
"...THE, Destroyer of Worlds!!" ..... well at least Your world......
@@Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P Galactus.
I called mine "Bipolar Betty".
Isn't this rather speculative? If Nemisis were indeed 500 AU away initially, how could it have moved by 600 LY? What could have propelled it away from its twin, our Sun? Isn't it more likely that the twin or the smaller sibling would have merged into Sun?
Perhaps same magnetic polarities?
Don't forget the fact that the Sun was formed 4.5 bya
I'm rather sceptical too.
Never heard of this 'Sun's twin' ever before.
It's not the closest star, Proxima Centauri and none of the nearby stars are moving closer.
Because all stars are moving away from each other, that's the mainly held theory or isn't it?
I agree with you. This video is speculative comic book science.
@@AudieHolland that's because every star orbits the milky way and our stellar neighborhood is only temporary
i mean if we somehow could magically orbit the galaxy once, our stellar neighborhood will be waay different from what it is rn
If it wasn’t for the Sun’s evil twin we wouldn’t be here.
Cannot say the same blessing over lessons of the prior civilization among the solar system, but yes. It's true.
What if, dinosaurs are truly the ones that thanked god for providing them food and an ark to survive the flood and the human in dinosaur’s digestive systems lived on later in a computer simulation ran by civilized dinosaurs feeling superstitiously guilty about their history. What if, BTW, they're mostly vegetarians now thanks as well to sun god's evil twin's guilting them to be more human. It's a particle anti particle mentality taken too far if you ask me including sun's twin being a primordial Black hole in our rush to be so special to have something that ancient gravitationally entangled with our solar system about 4 years ago. What if,
ahh yes the big bugs lizards fish birds that aren’t birds and smaller than average rats
Maybe that explains my ex. She was an evil twin.
@@Oldgreycowboy 💀
If we map the stars that are 26 -27 million light years away from us, we would see that Nemesis would have to pass through several thousands of other solar systems, before any "returning" star came our way. There would be obvious trails of destruction littered along the way. There is nothing in the fossil record about some clockwork events as described.
It's a 27 million year ORBIT that brings it back around... Not 27 million light years...
Um 27 million LY would put it 100 times as far away as the Magellanic clouds.
BTW the Milky Way is less than 200,000 LY wide
@@bosatsu76 It seems to me everyone got it wrong. 😂
@@bosatsu76 Something that far away would be stupid to call it a binary star.
@@bosatsu76 Whilst I agree with you if a star was orbiting our sun with an orbital period of 27 million years, and on a highly elliptical orbit then it would get out further than many of our nearest stars, I'm not sure how many but a lot. Whilst there is always the possibility of this scenario being true, or even a stray star or planet that has been ejected from it's original galaxy or solar system this whole video smacks to me or putting a theory out there was fact, that just can't be proven one way or another, which to me isn't very scientific, and is really just click bait. Sure it could be true but I think there are better, simpler explanations.
Yes, but does sun’s evil twin solves the problem of why astroids always aim to land in craters
Amen...
That's due to huge momentum of asteroids which melt the surface around them and causes it to flow in the outward direction making a crater
Hm I never thought about that, why has no one wondered why
@@student69741 - Wow! If it was left up to some people, science would be completely dead.
Lmfao!, I.c.u....
Nice fiction story, but it makes no sense.
This HD 186302 star, is supposedly 184 light years away, but formed just 500 AU away?. I mean if basically any star was 184 LY's away, it would have no effect on our solar system at all. And this small star, should then be able to disrupt the Keiper belt every 27 million years? That would require HD 186302 to be in an orbit, than comes into quite close contact with our solar system, maybe a few light years, which is bollocks. And on top of that, if it formed 500 AU away and is still gravitationally bound in some sense, to come within a few LY's, how come its now 184 light years away?
I mean come on now.
He probably could've included a couple more suggestions from the main article he's quoting. (second link)
It posits that the sun may have absorbed most of the gases from its stellar twin, and it's now a fairly dark dwarf star that we can't really detect that easily since it's not giving off much energy. If the sun did this, the other star would have gone into a much wider orbit over time, and could fit the description of the dwarf star going through the outer regions of the system and kicking some asteroids around. It could easily be in a long, highly eccentric orbit and dim enough to not stand out from the background radiation/objects. Considering Halley's comet, with a maximum distance of 35 AU and a minimum distance of 0.5 AU, a stellar-sized object that got flung into the outer reaches of the solar system could easily have an orbit in the millions of years. If it's in a similar orbital configuration, it may just be grazing the outskirts of the system when it makes its nearest passes.
@@jackyoung1208
That would be a more plausible theory, but in that case, we ain't taking about a star. Then it's the Nibiru-theory? Here he speaks of a star, slightly larger than our sun. And I looked up some data mentioning that
HD 186302 was roughly 184 LY's away.
I'm not sure if Nibiru and the M. Brown and K. Batygin theory of "their" Planet Nine, could somehow be one and the same. I mean obviously not, if Planet Nine is in the orbit that they are predicting. But maybe an object much further out, could recreate the same signs?
But if every single atom’s ACTIONS had equal and opposite reactions for the duration of its life the binary star system would collapse the other star into a black hole. quantum entanglement would work with the stars through the eyes of all of the life within the solar systems of all of the stars that are born this way. Because double slit has proven that any type of observation is also basically how light travels and even crystals or diamonds are alive so all the planets are technically alive and the black holes are some type of reflective communications across space and time and distance within these systems.
Should've called it 'Nus'
You are not alone, I am here with you
Most star systems are Binary. Absolutely fascinating ☀️ Jupiter could be the Star that didn’t ignite. The Universe is full of mystery! Where would our Sun’s twin be? Astrophysics always is intriguing!
The content + the music choice is a vibe 🚀
I thought I was gonna read a bunch of Planet X comments….
It was actually called Wormwood by the natives some cultures called it Nibiru. The big planet with the second sun people are seeing it more now. On the 8th of April it will be visible
If that red dwarf is only 1.5LY distant, then it's currently in our sun's gravity well.
Sirius can be the Suns twin. Before 500 AD all ancient civilisations named Sirius the red star. Now it is blue. According to the Doppler effect, this means when it was red, it moved away from us. Now when it is blue, it comes back to his twin the Sun. Just heard this thought and find it very interesting.
You can see serious a&b in the night sky, they've been calling at Mercury and Jupiter
Actually, Sirius is a current double star. One of the is a white dwarf, which is what a red star becomes when it goes Nova. Most of the sources I've seen figure that the red one of the pair went Nova and collapsed into the white dwarf.
Well, like all evil twins, the intention is spurred by jealousy so coming back is not to reconcile, but destroy- ultimately to no avail. Evil twins may cause havoc for a season, but good trumps bad and ultimately always wins..
Our Sun and Nemesis or other trouble twin is a really interesting proposition and deserves astrometic data research new knowledge for me after 62 plus yrs.
Trace Sun's magnetic field on both sides and you will find out where is Nemesis. Thanks.
There are old stories of the purple sun being the original sun. Old civilizations speak of Saturn being the original sun, then being replaced by the current sun after it died and faded.
I think I'd have noticed a second sun.
I just feel like Jupiter was going to become the Sun's twin as it was especially closer to the Sun back in it's infancy phase, but just didn't. And over the years was gradually pushed away and moved to it's current location.
Jupiter's mass isn't anywhere close to that of even the smallest stars. And compared to other gas giants we have found since we began identifying exoplanets, it's not a particularly large gas giant planet either. The idea that Jupiter is a "failed star" was based on very outdated knowledge. From what we've learned to this point, it takes a LOT more mass to approach that point. It is also currently understood that gas giants have rocky cores, starting out as ice planets that accrete large amounts of gas from the protoplanetary disc of a forming star. Basically, an icy/rocky world that has a very big atmosphere.
@@Kelnxso a planet that formed like Jupiter could never become a star?
@@snotsbuttwax Correct. Jupiter's mass is close to 2 x 10^27 kg, or about 1/1000th the mass of the Sun. Brown Dwarfs, which are the smallest types of stars and are effectively "failed stars" as they aren't massive enough to undergo sustained normal hydrogen fusion, are more than 10 times the mass of Jupiter at the low end. The smallest "real" stars are the red dwarfs, and they weigh in at around 80-100 times the mass of Jupiter at the low end.
Jupiter, like other gas giants, was born from the "leftovers" of star formation that created the Sun. The vast majority of gas in the region where the Sun formed was used in this process likely along with the formation of at least one "twin" star as the above video suggests. What is leftover was a mix of some gas (in astronomy terms Hydrogen and Helium) and metals (anything heavier than Hydrogen and Helium). It is believed (though not yet confirmed) that gas giants such as Jupiter which form after most of the gas has collapsed into stars instead begin as accreted rocky planetoids. The first to form which have the most material around them can accrete faster than others and thus gain more mass, first a rocky world (and potentially an icy world) and then accreting leftover gas to become gas giants. This is how it is believed Jupiter formed.
For Jupiter to become a star, a LOT of gas would have to be accreted by it. There simply isn't some 80 times its mass of gas available in local space to turn Jupiter into even a small red dwarf star. Even concepts posed in science fiction to turn Jupiter into a star are incredibly doubtful since there isn't that much material around to make it happen. Generally speaking, when there is that much gas around, it collapses into a star eventually on its own.
Some suggested Saturn formado before Júpiter and the Sun.
@@snotsbuttwax No, not at all. Jupiter isn't a failed star...just a medium-ish sized gas giant. It's not even close to the mass of a brown dwarf which are the least massive objects considered "star-like". There isn't enough mass in the rest of the solar system to make another star, the Sun is like 98~99% of the mass of the solar system.
What if "Nemesis" is the Nine Planet or Planet "X"???
Nemesis is not a planet. It's a star
The ninth planet would be planet IX, not planet X, Roman numerals being what they are...
What if small things were bigger?
IT would Be very interesting If sun were Have twin Star. I would like to see two suns like star wars. ☀️
Our second sun is in the middle of the earth thank me later
I bet you wouldn't like twice the heat
It's Jupiter.
This spaceship you know as the solar system, with a engine called the Sun, endured more episodes than any bibical, sci-fi show. drifting into natural vessels. Earth has been through inconceivable infinite reincarnation form, size, celestial parts and civilizations ago.
My theory is Jupiter is the bianery Star.Nemuses is what is left in the Astroiod belt.
Is it possible that sun's twin is also orbiting in the milkyway galaxy and only crosses paths with the sun every 230 million years, which is approximately the time it takes the sun to orbit the milky way galaxy?
very much possible
it should be noted..... our nearest sun system that is only 4 1/2 light years near to us and contains a G-class yellow-white star..... this is the same type of star just like our own.... we are related to the Centauri constellation.... is is estimated that the G-class yellow-white type stars make up about only 15% of all our stars in our own Galaxy.... also the G-class star is a Heavy metals producer .... this is where Gold comes from....
Nope, gold comes from magnetar mergers
Gold is simply a heavier element, it can be made to anything that can, not limited to one source
There are several candidates for Nemesis. Proxima Centauri, Luhman 16, or a primordial black hole.
How can they not see another star orbiting out far of our solar system especially after sending two probes that's already reached the ort cloud on the edge of our solar system. It can see other solar systems but not another star outside our own solar system I find very interesting strange.
Scientists say proxima centauri is our closest stellar neighbor. If we had a stellar sibling, we'd be able to see it.
Do you realize how long it took scientists to discover Wolf 359 and Luman 16?
Brown, sub-brown even red dwarfs are hard to find.
Only for now. All of the stars are constantly moving as the orbit the galaxy.
Interesting topic and well done video. Subscribed!
This is ridiculous - any star that came close enough to our sun during the last 100 m-years would not have been able to travel far enough away from us not to be easily detected as such a star.
It's sometimes more difficult to detect objects that are closer because the closer something is, the wider the variance of the angle in its movement. Far away object will move just the same, but because they are so far away, they appearr to be moving less, therefore making an object easier to track
Just think . . .
We didn't even need a "Nemesis" to kick off the 6th mass extinction event.
Be sure to R.S.V.P.
Spaces are going fast!
6th?
I think you're a few behind the curve.
There have been more than 6
@@MichaelClark-uw7ex 5, 6, 9 . . . Weeeee!
Bro this is amazing ...
You are all wrong! It ain't a twin, it's was always a triple sun!
What if proxima centuri is the sun's twin and moved to alpha centuri system by time (just imagination)
Were most likely a fringe star on the outer edge of the spiral arms of the Galaxy where it's more remote and and quiet .
Ummm…everything about this is either wrong or unlikely at best. If the sun had formed as part of a binary system, then there’s no way we would be here now. The only way that works is if you assume that the two stars became separated while they were still in the nascent stages of their formation. Any later and the planets would have started to form, and what ever event got rid of the twin would almost definitely have destroyed or pulled away the planets.
The most likely answer to “did the sun form as part of a binary system” is no, it did not.
If people honestly believe the sun is 93M miles away, we need to re-open the Asylums.
There are dozens of other theories out there that could explain the 27 million year extinction patern.
Hypotheses
@@nomdeguerre7265 ah yes, that is a better word
Also the large portion of Earth's history we lost due to erosion and etc
The theory of Nemesis has been around for a while, but as the ability to detect objects has gone up, the likelihood of Nemesis has decreased significantly, since it still has not been detected, despite efforts made to locate it, it it exists.
The suns companion would have been Jupiter, if it had enough mass.
But what if our twin star is a brown darf, then the only way to see it is through Infrared, and we would have to locate it with James web.
@@user-gb3ng1ck3o They would still be able to detect it through gravity and it's influence on the other planets. That's how Neptune was discovered in 1846.
@@williampilling2168 there is a gravitational pull that's unaccounted for in our solar system, beyond Neptune. They added a mass close or equal to our sun and the math fit, they say our systems
Is binary and most likely merged but I find that hard to believe when the oldest story told, is of an ancient civilization that lived around a brown dwarf star, and help shape our world as we know it today. Now we are finding evidence of something big that tugs on the planets, and our sun had been acting didffernt maybe just maybe the mayan's clock was the obrit of this star, at its passing it turns everything upside down and sends a lot of debris our way.
I read somewhere that Jupiter was the lost twin but due to anomaly in mass it went out to become a planet.
Jupiter isn’t a planet. It’s a gas giant.
@@lisanidog8178 DUH it is a gas giant which is a type of PLANET!! So is Saturn and it is a planet too. My god your teachers should be sued. From the sun out. Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are the 8 "planets" in our solar system. Plus a lot of smaller planetoids such as Pluto.
@@huntjl88 planets are rocky! Gas giants aren’t so they’re not called planets.
@@lisanidog8178 OMG go back to school moron. Planet: A planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit. What it is made of doesn't matter.
@@lisanidog8178
It's a long shot to say stars like ours are always binary based on that study. There's other data showing a star like ours can be a single. As long as we're throwing out hypothesis. One possiblity is our binary star was a brown dwaft. We couldn't see Pluto with the Hubble, something like that would be very difficult to identify. Or, maybe it was bigger, and just took off. We've seen stars in open space traveling at around a million miles per hour. After as many revolutions as we've traveled around our Milky Way, it could be anywhere.
The Oort Cloud is a mystery. It's a real possibility that there are cycles that bring objects into our Solar System. Because the Milky Way isn't flat like a plate, but instead it's wavy, there's a variety of explanations as to why this could be happening. Maybe we are passing in and out of a debris field that has somehow remained in a somewhat flat plane.
If you buy into the hypothesis by JPL that almost all Solar Systems have Super Earths except ours. And after their formation, Saturn and Jupiter began a death spiral towards the Sun (until they got into a gravitational dance that put them into the orbits they are in now). Then one of those original rocky bodies that didn't end up colliding into another, might have been ejected into an extremely oblong orbit that crosses the Oort Cloud.
Speaking of Super Earths, something is out there beyond Pluto. We can't see it, at least for now, but it's not a debris field. It can only be 1 of 4 things so you pick. A. a Super Earth B. another Neptune C. a captured planet or D. a small Black Hole. D is almost impossible and A&B would have had to be ejected during early planet migration.
One things for sure, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when another object intersects with Earth. We're going to have to understand how to fend off large objects. Here, as soon as possible, but in the not so distant future, on the Moon and then Mars.
If you want to find earth like planets, then the starmentioned at3:48 seconds, that'll most likely have similar chemical make up for the planets as Sol.
Maybe the reason why our Solar System is being drawn towards the center of the galaxy is because it felt Nemesis was there..
there is sure a nemesis there.
@@Alwindar1 yes and it is insectoid, not reptilian or AI
The solar system isn't moving toward the center of the galaxy.
If nemesis was flung out on a gravity slingshot, the sun would move the opposite way, being thrown by the release of nemesis' gravity and mass.
nemesis doesnt exist otherwise we wouldnt exist, this video is fake an solar system is not moving to sagittarius A, its actually gonna be catalputed or changed orbits after andromeda an milky way colision
A few years ago i read that Sol's sibling may be HD 162826 about 110ly away, 15% more mass and near Vega in the night sky.
Vega is only 25ly away from sol, so HD162826 could not be near Vega.
@@orogenicman It could appear near Vega in the night sky. Like Jupiter and Venus can appear close in the night sky, but actually are not.
It's FAR more likely that Jupiter was destined to be our Sun's "twin". It just never fully developed
I'm worried 2nd Sun might shine in the middle of the night and wake me up
I thought the comet cycles were caused by our solar system's elliptical rotation around the galactic core.
They also coincide closely to the up/down movement through the plane of the galaxy during ithe sun's orbit
It would be sort of possible if something just flung Nemesis away quickly as thats the only way i would possibly think this twin sun thing would work if it was ejected and the whole knocking the asteroid towards the earth would be pure coincidence as the supposed twin would have a more likely chance of missing earth.
what if our creator was from nemesis system
Yes, it is still affecting our system. Nemesis, was once a Sun, to its 7 planets (Making us a Binary system) but has become a Brown Dwarf now. Planet 6 (Nibiru) orbits upwards and enters our solar system, pass between Jupiter and Mars, right where another planet used to be (Tiamat), then goes around our Sun, and heads back to its Brown Dwarf, and returns in another 3,657-years.
4:21 The Space Boulder is conflicted about fighting a young, blind, girl astronaut.
The Plane Crash that never investigated and reported Dogma....
Now this is metaphysical and unscientific, but what if this caused the duality system to become so prevalent among creatures on Earth, both in biology as well as in psychology, culture and art?
We think of dinosaurs as poor creatures the went extinct. But, they roamed the earth for almost 100 million years. Humans haven’t been around for even 0.5 million years. How long more you think we can stick around as a species?
I’ll believe it when you show me a real picture of the twin star. Where is it?
What if it was alpha Centauri?
What gravitational force would pull this alleged twin back around every 26 million years?? The sun certainly doesn't have that type of gravitational influence, nor does any reasonably close by stars.
Relative velocity could be lower
How is Jupiter not a second sun,,it's just not ignited yet
Velikovsky - Planets in collision - or Thunderbolt project - symbols of an alien sky.
Very difficult to understand by the empty headed like me however interesting!!
Same here 😂
@@maryamshamim192 hahahaha 😂😂 but keep watching something definitely reveal on us after all at least even you and I are still not a monkey 🐵!! Hahahaha 😂🤣 stay happy and blessed
@@asmafareed5227 😂🌸
It’s Jupiter a failed star
Maybe that explains ancient civilizations talking about huge explosions might have been asteroids instead of alien weapons
Watching from KSA jeddah ofw
0:57 I think that the sun's heat triggered the movement of the chiclub meteorite. like stone when it melts. but then on a bigger scale
27 million years circle of extinction on Earth, 27 is very familiar number for me, that's age of my Mother passed away with my just born younger sister lived for less than an hour, I was just 2 years 8 months old and since then been living around the world all alone.
I doubt there is any substantial content here. Mass extinctions are on the 100 million year timescale. The suns oscillation through the galactic plane takes 60 million years, so it could be said that we pass through the radial centre of mass about once every 30 million years, hypothetically passing other stars on their own paths. But a regular cycle of 27 million yr seems unlikely, unless it is associated with the reversal of the gravitational pull and the changing gravitational gradient in the neighbourhood of the sun.
Common origin with Sun was found to be unlikely in a 2019 paper, as HD 186302's galactic orbit is very different from Sun's. Copied from Wikipedia. There is also a link to that paper.
Interesting use of personification.
I seen the second sun once. It was very LOW on horizon so you could see it for only 5mins. It was a red dwarf star not bright but angry red. I took photo on my phone but later entire screen went white. I should have messaged it to other phone to save it. BUT............hindsight is 20/20.
Wasn't Jupiter meant to be a star?
Does the gravity of the sun and Proxima Centauri affect each other?
I think this study is more complicated than it needs to be. The Suns birth was near, not someplace across the galaxy.
It only makes since that our system was or is a binary system. We could still have one if it’s a distant Brown dwarf we might not even see it to this day without knowing where to look at exactly the right time.
So, in 2017. Some Scientists was awarded a bunch of awards to tell the Science world that millions of years ago we had a twin or Bi-nary companion.
Also, what happened to all the videos about so-called Planet X or Nemesis.
What is You Tube afraid of.
I have a question. Why is it that the rainbow is always doubled???
And why are the “Sundowns” getting redder and redder. I’ve been sitting on my surfboard at sundown since 1977. The Sundowns have changed. The color has gotten a deep almost blood red.
Why are people seeing 2 suns in the sky and posting them online???
I hate how these productions take highly speculative “hypothesis” and present it as fact. We have seen star systems forming with only one central star. The “Nemesis” star isn’t a twin, but sun’s rotation around the Milky Way.
“There was a sibling but…she ate it.” 😁
I like the theory that Sirius is a binary with the sun. Its likely not the case, but there are some convincing arguments.
If it's a 26-27 million year cycle....then it's never happened in our lifetime, and it never will. We can't prove anything on these timescales.
I have a theory that Gliese 710 the star heading to our solar system is nemisis just warping back towards us but possibly not due to the fact that it's 62 light years away. Just what i think.
Put this in a computer starting with our solar system and go backwards and see if its possible
Nemesis' departure actually caused the Permian-Triassic extinction event. Quite accurate in that over 58 percent of stars start off and/or maintain a binary stellar system throughout their lives.
Where the heck did you find this misinformation at?
The Permian extinction event is directly correlated to the Siberian traps in what is now modern-day Russia. While there have been several attempts to connect this with an astrological even, the ONLY mass extinction event that was not caused by either life on earth or geological forces on earth was the double asteroid impact that took out the dinosaurs.
@Logan Skiwyse - Yes. The Siberian Traps volcanos erupted continuously for millions of years, raising ocean temps above 40°C/104°F. It was the biggest volcanic event in the last 500 million years.
@@loganskiwyse7823 Partially correct - Siberia's lavabeds which were experiencing strains and fractures anyway, were previously cracking and were causing extremely heated fossil fuels to be released. Now all this was leading to a massive greenhouse effect, but the proximity of Nemesis to Earth (retraction stages) accentuated the process. As Nemesis was pulling away, the gravitational effects further created massive lithospheric tears and rips. So thus, super enhancing the greenhouse process as enormous pools of boiling fossil fuels were left exposed to the atmosphere.
PS: When you have friends in "very low" places, you get to learn a thing or two not published by conventional science
@@achaille9110 Partially correct - Siberia's lavabeds which were experiencing strains and fractures anyway, were previously cracking and were causing extremely heated fossil fuels to be released. Now all this was leading to a massive greenhouse effect, but the proximity of Nemesis to Earth (retraction stages) accentuated the process. As Nemesis was pulling away, the gravitational effects further created massive lithospheric tears and rips. So thus, super enhancing the greenhouse process as enormous pools of boiling fossil fuels were left exposed to the atmosphere.
PS: When you have friends in "very low" places, you get to learn a thing or two not published by conventional science
@@travestielyl except Nemesis had NOTHING to do with it. Sorry the entire theory of Nemesis has been debunked. We know where our suns (sister stars) are. You can identify them by their specific spectral signature. And the perturbances in the ort cloud line up with our passage both through spiral arms and up/down as we do move through the galactic plane.
Nemesis is just a wild hypothesis from decades ago and nothing more. Every aspect of this narrative has been debunked.
Every planet that we know had an active core has rifts just like you see in the Siberian traps. It did not disgorge fossil fuels. Lava is not a fossil fuel. Your thinking greenhouse and other volcanic gases. And there are a dozen or more volcanic rifts of significant size visible on the surface today. Including at least 3 major area's I know of in western Americas. I suspect a volcanologist could name dozens just on the north American contentment alone.
Extraordinary hypothesis requires extraordinary evidence to support it becoming theory. There is no evidence at all behind the Nemesis hypothesis. Just a set of unconnected facts that bring zero evidence to prove its existence. Those facts are laid out in the hypothesis above but that's not evidence of a solar body only evidence such bodies exist. And again, we know which stars near us match our sun's chemical spectral signature. None, not a single one, still passes close enough to our sun to affect anything in orbit around it.
However, every time we pass through one of the galactic arms we pass by thousands of other stars. Far more likely to cause a asteroid impact. Any star that got close enough to affect the volcanic system of Earth would be close enough to knock the Earth out of orbit.
This hypothesis is therefore impossible.
‘Wonder twin power, activate!’✌️
Because it became Jupiter.
The only thing which can fall under category Sun sibling would be Jupiter, which failed to gather enough mass to be as important as our Sun. The relation between stars in binary systems is clear but mysterious evil Sun twin sounds better for youtube hits. Absurd video.
Meh, its much more sense that the other sun was fused with the current one.
A 27 million year orbit is not that far out in galactic scale... It's certainly not as far as Alpha Centauri... And we found IT just fine... It must be moving against the background stars fast enough for telescopes to catch...
It would make sense that a negative and a positive sun fused together.which would explain my two right feet.
I can not express enough how laughably devoid of evidence this Nemesis hypothesis has which makes it all the more surprising it is on this channel.
Come back at me in a few million light years and see what really happened
1:38 Young single stars in your area, right now!
The Blue Sun blows cold within Doctor Who.
Is there a twin? Maybe, maybe not. All that's known is that stars are born in clusters which don't last long. Did it cause the extinction of dinosaurs? No!
Moving from strange ideas to theories.
If HD186302 does bad things to THIS solar system every 26 million years and it's 185 light years away that is one HELL of an elliptical orbit.
I had great respect f0r SOU, but now I have none.
No one cares
@@student69741 Like fake CNN news, science has become fake.
Every 3600 years…and it’s here now.
Yeah, it’s also possible that I’ll win the Lottery - I won’t hold my breath ☀️
So some scientists ran some numbers and formed a theory. I can do the same, 1 + 1 equals there's probably another planet in the universe that's got millions of goats living on it. Still needs more evidence but you can now make a video about it.
So does this make Nemesis a 'fraternal twin' to the Sun?
Samaritan ref?
It would be more like an identical twin. Both would have formed from the same region of nebular overdensity, analogous to twins forming from the same zygote. Likewise, the binary partner would also have about the same spectroscopic chemical signature as the Sun, analogous to twins having the same genome.