Why the German Army failed in the West 43-44

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 12. 2020
  • The German Army had serious problems with conducting counter-attacks against the Western Allied Forces in 1943-44 this was different to the Situation on Eastern Front against the Red Army. As such the question is, why was this the case and this is not about logistics.
    Disclaimer: I received a pre-release ebook of Prof. Neitzel’s Book “ Deutsche Krieger. Vom Kaiserreich zur Berliner Republik - eine Militärgeschichte ”.
    Cover: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    Colorization: vonKickass
    Other modifications: MHV
    »» SUPPORT MHV ««
    » patreon - see videos early (adfree) - / mhv
    » subscribe star - www.subscribestar.com/mhv
    » paypal donation - paypal.me/mhvis
    » CZcams Membership - / @militaryhistoryvisual...
    »» MERCHANDISE ««
    » teespring - teespring.com/stores/military...
    » SOURCES «
    Neitzel, Sönke: Deutsche Krieger. Vom Kaiserreich zur Berliner Republik - eine Militärgeschichte. Propyläen: Berlin, Germany, 2020.
    OKH: Zusammendruck der Ausbildungshinweise Nr. 10-23. Nr. 2000 / 44 geh. H.Qu. OKH, 5. Mai 1944.
    BArch, RW 38/183: Oberbefehlshaber West: Erfahrungen und Folgerungen aus den Landungskämpfen von Salerno. 25.12.1943
    Glantz, David M.; House, Jonathan M.: Armageddon in Stalingrad. The Stalingrad Trilogy, Volume 2: September-November 1942. University Press of Kansas: United States, 2009.
    Dick, C. J.: From Victory to Stalemate. The Western Front, Summer 1944. Decisive and Indecisive Military Operations, Volume 1. University Press of Kansas: Kansas, US, 2016.
    Dick, C. J.: From Defeat to Victory. The Eastern Front, Summer 1944. Decisive and Indecisive Military Operations, Volume 2. University Press of Kansas: Kansas, US, 2016.
    Citino, Robert M.: The Wehrmacht Retreats: Fighting a Lost War, 1943. University Press Kansas, USA, 2012.
    Töppel, Roman: Kursk 1943. The Greatest Battle of the Second World War. Helion: Warwick, UK: 2018.
    Citino, Robert M.: The Wehrmacht’s Last Stand. The German Campaigns of 1944-1945. University Press of Kansas: USA, 2017.
    Creveld, Martin van: Fighting Power. German and U.S. Army Performance, 1939-1945. Greenwood Press: Westport, Connecticut, USA, 1982.
    #WehrmachtFail,#WhyWehrmachtFail,#GermanArmyFail

Komentáře • 1,4K

  • @omaralonso2471
    @omaralonso2471 Před 3 lety +743

    Because they had everything on the east 🤣

  • @MisterApol
    @MisterApol Před 3 lety +1

    My father was an artillery observer in North Africa, Sicily, Italy, Southern France, and the Bulge. He remarked once how the German sound ranging equipment was well made, but they did not bury it like US artillery observers were trained to do. When shelling started, German sound ranging wires were quickly cut, while US microphones kept working. Once, on a cold night in Italy, my father ranged in on a German railway gun that was "sniping" at US positions. In clear, cold conditions, he triangulated on the source of the firing. A dive bomber attack at dawn found a railway tunnel at the location he indicated. They bombed both ends of the tunnel. When the lines moved up, they found a large railway gun entombed in the tunnel. Sound ranging allowed my father to locate the gun within six meters of its actual location--this from nearly 20 miles away.

  • @SSN515
    @SSN515 Před 3 lety +1

    Kinda creepy. The Prof just sits there staring at you and speaks without moving his lips.....

  • @crownprincesebastianjohano7069

    The long and short of it is that the Wehrmacht of 1940-1941 did not exist. They had lost too many experienced and gifted officers and men. The Heer of 1943-44 had a huge hemorraging of institutional knowledge and tactical experience. It was like Napoleon's Army in 1813: Too many old hands gone, too many young, inexperienced kids and not enough of everything materially.

  • @parrot849
    @parrot849 Před 3 lety +54

    Fascinating video. Thank You.

  • @free_at_last8141
    @free_at_last8141 Před 3 lety +330

    "How do you define fail?"

  • @tomsmith3045
    @tomsmith3045 Před 3 lety +87

    This was fascinating. I have friends who were in US artillery in the 70's, and they were very much focused on counter battery fire, but I didn't know we were so good at it back in the 40's. I did know that US artillery was very aggressive, in the sense that the cost of barrels and shells wasn't even considered.

  • @hoaiyannguyen3608
    @hoaiyannguyen3608 Před 3 lety +94

    I appreciate bringing such celebrities as Prof Neitzel as guests to your channel. Especially since my funds for books are somewhat limited during this pandemic. Very informative and nicely conducted podcast. :)

  • @AlmostaDoctor1
    @AlmostaDoctor1 Před 3 lety +66

    I love how much detail is included in your videos.

  • @TheMr77469
    @TheMr77469 Před 3 lety +63

    Prof. Neitzel’s pic was so High quality I was expecting a video interview, for him to start moving and taking,

  • @ancientfungi7818
    @ancientfungi7818 Před 3 lety +31

    I loved how MHV finally pointed out the strategic advantages of the allied artillery emphasis. I always enjoy his videos on artillery because artillery is pretty "unpopular" with the popular military culture. Everyone just really likes to talk about tanks and aircraft. Artillery is not about the weapon itself (even though the experiences of troops with certain weapons (-systems) sure is interesting), but it's about the effect of artillery fire that determines it's capabilities. WWI artllery ordnance is outclassed by ordnance developed in the 1930-40s but using it effectively will make it less "obsolete" than people would think. Just look at finnish artillery in Sommer 1944. Finland for the most part used WWI ordnance but their effects were great in the defensive battles of Sommer 1944. I feel like I digressed too much.

  • @jruss609
    @jruss609 Před 3 lety +272

    I love these people commenting with an explanation on a 26min long video within 8min of the video being released 🤣

  • @Predator20357
    @Predator20357 Před 3 lety +28

    Drink every time someone doesn’t watch the video first before stating their opinion.

  • @iliaminkin5605
    @iliaminkin5605 Před 3 lety +7

    Prof Neitzel is very interesting to listen to! Thank you for bringing him to the channel.

  • @packr72
    @packr72 Před 3 lety +126

    The US Army brought a ton of firepower to the fight. In addition regular Armored Divisions, every single US infantry division was reinforced with an independent tank battalion and in many cases a tank destroyer battalion. The lowly German grunt would’ve killed to have a StuG permanently attached to his infantry division, let alone a tank.

  • @banba317
    @banba317 Před 2 lety

    Excellent presentation, as usual!

  • @williamrolston4466
    @williamrolston4466 Před 3 lety +2

    Wow. This is great. I like it when my conception s have been challenged. Thanks for this.

  • @ninaakari5181
    @ninaakari5181 Před 3 lety +64

    I love having KITT teaching us about history. Feel a bit sorry he have replaced Hasselhoff, but I bet prof. Neitzel is a good Knightrider too

  • @billd.iniowa2263
    @billd.iniowa2263 Před 3 lety +56

    The terrain in the West is totally different than in the East. It's much tighter. The East is much more open. Dont send one Tiger to do what four Panzer IVs could do better.

  • @Music_games_history
    @Music_games_history Před 3 lety

    So cool you got Neizel to join you on this one.